Review



primary human dermal fibroblasts adult  (ATCC)


Bioz Verified Symbol ATCC is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol ATCC manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 86

    Structured Review

    ATCC primary human dermal fibroblasts adult
    Primary Human Dermal Fibroblasts Adult, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/primary human dermal fibroblasts adult/product/ATCC
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
    primary human dermal fibroblasts adult - by Bioz Stars, 2024-11
    86/100 stars

    Images



    Similar Products

    86
    Cell Applications Inc human dermal fibroblasts
    Human Dermal Fibroblasts, supplied by Cell Applications Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/human dermal fibroblasts/product/Cell Applications Inc
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
    human dermal fibroblasts - by Bioz Stars, 2024-11
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    ATCC primary human dermal fibroblasts adult
    Primary Human Dermal Fibroblasts Adult, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/primary human dermal fibroblasts adult/product/ATCC
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
    primary human dermal fibroblasts adult - by Bioz Stars, 2024-11
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    ATCC human dermal fibroblast cells
    NIH 3T3 cells stacking on 3D microcavity. (a) The illustration shows the stages of stacking formation in NIH 3T3 mouse <t>fibroblast</t> cells. The cells crawl down from the reservoir, as indicated by the arrows. After 72 h, the stacking is fully formed within the microcavity. (b) 3D reconstructions of confocal images, displaying the z-projection and corresponding y–z and x–z sections of cells (along the white lines). The cells are stained for F-actin (red) and the nucleus (blue) at the initial (left) and final (final) stages of stacking cell formation. The yellow dotted boxes indicate the boundaries of the PDMS substrate. The scale bars represent 100 μ m. (c) The plot shows the height of the initial and final stages of stacking cell formation for different gaps ranging from L s = 100–400 μ m. The results demonstrate that the final stage of stacking cells has a significantly greater cell height compared to the initial stage. Statistical analysis was performed using Kolmogorov–Smirnov test, comparing the initial cell height of each group as the control, ** P < 0.01, n = 5, error bars show standard deviation. (d) The plot presents the number of cells at the initial and final stages of stacking formation for various microcavity side lengths. Statistical analysis was conducted using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test, comparing the cell number at the initial stage as the control, * P < 0.05, n = 4, error bars show standard deviation. (e) Region of interest (ROI) for migration trajectory analysis around the microcavity represented by L s = 100 μ m. The scale bar is 100 μ m. (f) Determination of the angle during cell migration from the reservoir to the microcavity. The rose plot represents the migration direction from the initial point to the final point during the stacking formation from (e). (g) This is a 3D reconstruction of confocal images stained for F-actin, Fn, and Col I at the final stage of stacking formation along the white lines represented by L s = 100 μ m. Single-channel micrographs have been presented in grayscale to improve contrast and clarity. Scale bar: 100 μ m. h, These plots display gene expression of Col I and Fn with GAPDH as the housekeeping gene, indicating the upregulation of both genes during the final stage of stacking cell formation. Statistical analysis was performed using Wilcoxon test, comparing D1 (initial time) as the control, n = 3, error bars show standard deviation.
    Human Dermal Fibroblast Cells, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/human dermal fibroblast cells/product/ATCC
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
    human dermal fibroblast cells - by Bioz Stars, 2024-11
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    PromoCell normal human dermal fibroblasts
    NIH 3T3 cells stacking on 3D microcavity. (a) The illustration shows the stages of stacking formation in NIH 3T3 mouse <t>fibroblast</t> cells. The cells crawl down from the reservoir, as indicated by the arrows. After 72 h, the stacking is fully formed within the microcavity. (b) 3D reconstructions of confocal images, displaying the z-projection and corresponding y–z and x–z sections of cells (along the white lines). The cells are stained for F-actin (red) and the nucleus (blue) at the initial (left) and final (final) stages of stacking cell formation. The yellow dotted boxes indicate the boundaries of the PDMS substrate. The scale bars represent 100 μ m. (c) The plot shows the height of the initial and final stages of stacking cell formation for different gaps ranging from L s = 100–400 μ m. The results demonstrate that the final stage of stacking cells has a significantly greater cell height compared to the initial stage. Statistical analysis was performed using Kolmogorov–Smirnov test, comparing the initial cell height of each group as the control, ** P < 0.01, n = 5, error bars show standard deviation. (d) The plot presents the number of cells at the initial and final stages of stacking formation for various microcavity side lengths. Statistical analysis was conducted using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test, comparing the cell number at the initial stage as the control, * P < 0.05, n = 4, error bars show standard deviation. (e) Region of interest (ROI) for migration trajectory analysis around the microcavity represented by L s = 100 μ m. The scale bar is 100 μ m. (f) Determination of the angle during cell migration from the reservoir to the microcavity. The rose plot represents the migration direction from the initial point to the final point during the stacking formation from (e). (g) This is a 3D reconstruction of confocal images stained for F-actin, Fn, and Col I at the final stage of stacking formation along the white lines represented by L s = 100 μ m. Single-channel micrographs have been presented in grayscale to improve contrast and clarity. Scale bar: 100 μ m. h, These plots display gene expression of Col I and Fn with GAPDH as the housekeeping gene, indicating the upregulation of both genes during the final stage of stacking cell formation. Statistical analysis was performed using Wilcoxon test, comparing D1 (initial time) as the control, n = 3, error bars show standard deviation.
    Normal Human Dermal Fibroblasts, supplied by PromoCell, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/normal human dermal fibroblasts/product/PromoCell
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
    normal human dermal fibroblasts - by Bioz Stars, 2024-11
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    PromoCell human adult dermal fibroblasts c 12302
    NIH 3T3 cells stacking on 3D microcavity. (a) The illustration shows the stages of stacking formation in NIH 3T3 mouse <t>fibroblast</t> cells. The cells crawl down from the reservoir, as indicated by the arrows. After 72 h, the stacking is fully formed within the microcavity. (b) 3D reconstructions of confocal images, displaying the z-projection and corresponding y–z and x–z sections of cells (along the white lines). The cells are stained for F-actin (red) and the nucleus (blue) at the initial (left) and final (final) stages of stacking cell formation. The yellow dotted boxes indicate the boundaries of the PDMS substrate. The scale bars represent 100 μ m. (c) The plot shows the height of the initial and final stages of stacking cell formation for different gaps ranging from L s = 100–400 μ m. The results demonstrate that the final stage of stacking cells has a significantly greater cell height compared to the initial stage. Statistical analysis was performed using Kolmogorov–Smirnov test, comparing the initial cell height of each group as the control, ** P < 0.01, n = 5, error bars show standard deviation. (d) The plot presents the number of cells at the initial and final stages of stacking formation for various microcavity side lengths. Statistical analysis was conducted using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test, comparing the cell number at the initial stage as the control, * P < 0.05, n = 4, error bars show standard deviation. (e) Region of interest (ROI) for migration trajectory analysis around the microcavity represented by L s = 100 μ m. The scale bar is 100 μ m. (f) Determination of the angle during cell migration from the reservoir to the microcavity. The rose plot represents the migration direction from the initial point to the final point during the stacking formation from (e). (g) This is a 3D reconstruction of confocal images stained for F-actin, Fn, and Col I at the final stage of stacking formation along the white lines represented by L s = 100 μ m. Single-channel micrographs have been presented in grayscale to improve contrast and clarity. Scale bar: 100 μ m. h, These plots display gene expression of Col I and Fn with GAPDH as the housekeeping gene, indicating the upregulation of both genes during the final stage of stacking cell formation. Statistical analysis was performed using Wilcoxon test, comparing D1 (initial time) as the control, n = 3, error bars show standard deviation.
    Human Adult Dermal Fibroblasts C 12302, supplied by PromoCell, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/human adult dermal fibroblasts c 12302/product/PromoCell
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
    human adult dermal fibroblasts c 12302 - by Bioz Stars, 2024-11
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    Cell Applications Inc human neonatal dermal fibroblasts
    NIH 3T3 cells stacking on 3D microcavity. (a) The illustration shows the stages of stacking formation in NIH 3T3 mouse <t>fibroblast</t> cells. The cells crawl down from the reservoir, as indicated by the arrows. After 72 h, the stacking is fully formed within the microcavity. (b) 3D reconstructions of confocal images, displaying the z-projection and corresponding y–z and x–z sections of cells (along the white lines). The cells are stained for F-actin (red) and the nucleus (blue) at the initial (left) and final (final) stages of stacking cell formation. The yellow dotted boxes indicate the boundaries of the PDMS substrate. The scale bars represent 100 μ m. (c) The plot shows the height of the initial and final stages of stacking cell formation for different gaps ranging from L s = 100–400 μ m. The results demonstrate that the final stage of stacking cells has a significantly greater cell height compared to the initial stage. Statistical analysis was performed using Kolmogorov–Smirnov test, comparing the initial cell height of each group as the control, ** P < 0.01, n = 5, error bars show standard deviation. (d) The plot presents the number of cells at the initial and final stages of stacking formation for various microcavity side lengths. Statistical analysis was conducted using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test, comparing the cell number at the initial stage as the control, * P < 0.05, n = 4, error bars show standard deviation. (e) Region of interest (ROI) for migration trajectory analysis around the microcavity represented by L s = 100 μ m. The scale bar is 100 μ m. (f) Determination of the angle during cell migration from the reservoir to the microcavity. The rose plot represents the migration direction from the initial point to the final point during the stacking formation from (e). (g) This is a 3D reconstruction of confocal images stained for F-actin, Fn, and Col I at the final stage of stacking formation along the white lines represented by L s = 100 μ m. Single-channel micrographs have been presented in grayscale to improve contrast and clarity. Scale bar: 100 μ m. h, These plots display gene expression of Col I and Fn with GAPDH as the housekeeping gene, indicating the upregulation of both genes during the final stage of stacking cell formation. Statistical analysis was performed using Wilcoxon test, comparing D1 (initial time) as the control, n = 3, error bars show standard deviation.
    Human Neonatal Dermal Fibroblasts, supplied by Cell Applications Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/human neonatal dermal fibroblasts/product/Cell Applications Inc
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
    human neonatal dermal fibroblasts - by Bioz Stars, 2024-11
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    ATCC human dermal fibroblasts hdf
    NIH 3T3 cells stacking on 3D microcavity. (a) The illustration shows the stages of stacking formation in NIH 3T3 mouse <t>fibroblast</t> cells. The cells crawl down from the reservoir, as indicated by the arrows. After 72 h, the stacking is fully formed within the microcavity. (b) 3D reconstructions of confocal images, displaying the z-projection and corresponding y–z and x–z sections of cells (along the white lines). The cells are stained for F-actin (red) and the nucleus (blue) at the initial (left) and final (final) stages of stacking cell formation. The yellow dotted boxes indicate the boundaries of the PDMS substrate. The scale bars represent 100 μ m. (c) The plot shows the height of the initial and final stages of stacking cell formation for different gaps ranging from L s = 100–400 μ m. The results demonstrate that the final stage of stacking cells has a significantly greater cell height compared to the initial stage. Statistical analysis was performed using Kolmogorov–Smirnov test, comparing the initial cell height of each group as the control, ** P < 0.01, n = 5, error bars show standard deviation. (d) The plot presents the number of cells at the initial and final stages of stacking formation for various microcavity side lengths. Statistical analysis was conducted using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test, comparing the cell number at the initial stage as the control, * P < 0.05, n = 4, error bars show standard deviation. (e) Region of interest (ROI) for migration trajectory analysis around the microcavity represented by L s = 100 μ m. The scale bar is 100 μ m. (f) Determination of the angle during cell migration from the reservoir to the microcavity. The rose plot represents the migration direction from the initial point to the final point during the stacking formation from (e). (g) This is a 3D reconstruction of confocal images stained for F-actin, Fn, and Col I at the final stage of stacking formation along the white lines represented by L s = 100 μ m. Single-channel micrographs have been presented in grayscale to improve contrast and clarity. Scale bar: 100 μ m. h, These plots display gene expression of Col I and Fn with GAPDH as the housekeeping gene, indicating the upregulation of both genes during the final stage of stacking cell formation. Statistical analysis was performed using Wilcoxon test, comparing D1 (initial time) as the control, n = 3, error bars show standard deviation.
    Human Dermal Fibroblasts Hdf, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/human dermal fibroblasts hdf/product/ATCC
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
    human dermal fibroblasts hdf - by Bioz Stars, 2024-11
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    PromoCell human dermal fibroblast cell line nhdf
    NIH 3T3 cells stacking on 3D microcavity. (a) The illustration shows the stages of stacking formation in NIH 3T3 mouse <t>fibroblast</t> cells. The cells crawl down from the reservoir, as indicated by the arrows. After 72 h, the stacking is fully formed within the microcavity. (b) 3D reconstructions of confocal images, displaying the z-projection and corresponding y–z and x–z sections of cells (along the white lines). The cells are stained for F-actin (red) and the nucleus (blue) at the initial (left) and final (final) stages of stacking cell formation. The yellow dotted boxes indicate the boundaries of the PDMS substrate. The scale bars represent 100 μ m. (c) The plot shows the height of the initial and final stages of stacking cell formation for different gaps ranging from L s = 100–400 μ m. The results demonstrate that the final stage of stacking cells has a significantly greater cell height compared to the initial stage. Statistical analysis was performed using Kolmogorov–Smirnov test, comparing the initial cell height of each group as the control, ** P < 0.01, n = 5, error bars show standard deviation. (d) The plot presents the number of cells at the initial and final stages of stacking formation for various microcavity side lengths. Statistical analysis was conducted using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test, comparing the cell number at the initial stage as the control, * P < 0.05, n = 4, error bars show standard deviation. (e) Region of interest (ROI) for migration trajectory analysis around the microcavity represented by L s = 100 μ m. The scale bar is 100 μ m. (f) Determination of the angle during cell migration from the reservoir to the microcavity. The rose plot represents the migration direction from the initial point to the final point during the stacking formation from (e). (g) This is a 3D reconstruction of confocal images stained for F-actin, Fn, and Col I at the final stage of stacking formation along the white lines represented by L s = 100 μ m. Single-channel micrographs have been presented in grayscale to improve contrast and clarity. Scale bar: 100 μ m. h, These plots display gene expression of Col I and Fn with GAPDH as the housekeeping gene, indicating the upregulation of both genes during the final stage of stacking cell formation. Statistical analysis was performed using Wilcoxon test, comparing D1 (initial time) as the control, n = 3, error bars show standard deviation.
    Human Dermal Fibroblast Cell Line Nhdf, supplied by PromoCell, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/human dermal fibroblast cell line nhdf/product/PromoCell
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
    human dermal fibroblast cell line nhdf - by Bioz Stars, 2024-11
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    NIH 3T3 cells stacking on 3D microcavity. (a) The illustration shows the stages of stacking formation in NIH 3T3 mouse fibroblast cells. The cells crawl down from the reservoir, as indicated by the arrows. After 72 h, the stacking is fully formed within the microcavity. (b) 3D reconstructions of confocal images, displaying the z-projection and corresponding y–z and x–z sections of cells (along the white lines). The cells are stained for F-actin (red) and the nucleus (blue) at the initial (left) and final (final) stages of stacking cell formation. The yellow dotted boxes indicate the boundaries of the PDMS substrate. The scale bars represent 100 μ m. (c) The plot shows the height of the initial and final stages of stacking cell formation for different gaps ranging from L s = 100–400 μ m. The results demonstrate that the final stage of stacking cells has a significantly greater cell height compared to the initial stage. Statistical analysis was performed using Kolmogorov–Smirnov test, comparing the initial cell height of each group as the control, ** P < 0.01, n = 5, error bars show standard deviation. (d) The plot presents the number of cells at the initial and final stages of stacking formation for various microcavity side lengths. Statistical analysis was conducted using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test, comparing the cell number at the initial stage as the control, * P < 0.05, n = 4, error bars show standard deviation. (e) Region of interest (ROI) for migration trajectory analysis around the microcavity represented by L s = 100 μ m. The scale bar is 100 μ m. (f) Determination of the angle during cell migration from the reservoir to the microcavity. The rose plot represents the migration direction from the initial point to the final point during the stacking formation from (e). (g) This is a 3D reconstruction of confocal images stained for F-actin, Fn, and Col I at the final stage of stacking formation along the white lines represented by L s = 100 μ m. Single-channel micrographs have been presented in grayscale to improve contrast and clarity. Scale bar: 100 μ m. h, These plots display gene expression of Col I and Fn with GAPDH as the housekeeping gene, indicating the upregulation of both genes during the final stage of stacking cell formation. Statistical analysis was performed using Wilcoxon test, comparing D1 (initial time) as the control, n = 3, error bars show standard deviation.

    Journal: APL Bioengineering

    Article Title: Intercellular junction-driven stromal cell stacking in a confined 3D microcavity

    doi: 10.1063/5.0197187

    Figure Lengend Snippet: NIH 3T3 cells stacking on 3D microcavity. (a) The illustration shows the stages of stacking formation in NIH 3T3 mouse fibroblast cells. The cells crawl down from the reservoir, as indicated by the arrows. After 72 h, the stacking is fully formed within the microcavity. (b) 3D reconstructions of confocal images, displaying the z-projection and corresponding y–z and x–z sections of cells (along the white lines). The cells are stained for F-actin (red) and the nucleus (blue) at the initial (left) and final (final) stages of stacking cell formation. The yellow dotted boxes indicate the boundaries of the PDMS substrate. The scale bars represent 100 μ m. (c) The plot shows the height of the initial and final stages of stacking cell formation for different gaps ranging from L s = 100–400 μ m. The results demonstrate that the final stage of stacking cells has a significantly greater cell height compared to the initial stage. Statistical analysis was performed using Kolmogorov–Smirnov test, comparing the initial cell height of each group as the control, ** P < 0.01, n = 5, error bars show standard deviation. (d) The plot presents the number of cells at the initial and final stages of stacking formation for various microcavity side lengths. Statistical analysis was conducted using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test, comparing the cell number at the initial stage as the control, * P < 0.05, n = 4, error bars show standard deviation. (e) Region of interest (ROI) for migration trajectory analysis around the microcavity represented by L s = 100 μ m. The scale bar is 100 μ m. (f) Determination of the angle during cell migration from the reservoir to the microcavity. The rose plot represents the migration direction from the initial point to the final point during the stacking formation from (e). (g) This is a 3D reconstruction of confocal images stained for F-actin, Fn, and Col I at the final stage of stacking formation along the white lines represented by L s = 100 μ m. Single-channel micrographs have been presented in grayscale to improve contrast and clarity. Scale bar: 100 μ m. h, These plots display gene expression of Col I and Fn with GAPDH as the housekeeping gene, indicating the upregulation of both genes during the final stage of stacking cell formation. Statistical analysis was performed using Wilcoxon test, comparing D1 (initial time) as the control, n = 3, error bars show standard deviation.

    Article Snippet: NIH3T3 mouse fibroblast (ATCC CRL-1658) cells, human dermal fibroblast cells (ATCC PCS-201-012), and HaCaT cells were maintained in DMEM supplemented with 10% of fetal bovine serum (FBS) and antibiotics (100 U mL −1 penicillin and 100 μ g mL −1 streptomycin; Gibco, Grand Island, NY, USA).

    Techniques: Staining, Control, Standard Deviation, Migration, Expressing