Review



cd81  (MedChemExpress)


Bioz Verified Symbol MedChemExpress is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol MedChemExpress manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 93

    Structured Review

    MedChemExpress cd81
    Macrophages ingest β cell-derived dysfunctional mitochondria in the form of extracellular vesicles. (A) Generation of mtDsRed2-labeled MIN6 cells, cocultured with DIO-labeled BMDM for indicated time. (B) Representative confocal images of BMDM incubated with MIN6 cells (described in A) for 0.5, 12, and 24 h (n = 3). (C) Time-lapse confocal imaging revealing a mitochondria uptake event in macrophage. (D) qPCR analysis using specific primers for mtDNA from RAW264.7 and β-TC6 (n = 3). (E) qPCR analysis of mtDNA from β-TC6 in RAW264.7 individual cultured (Mon-RAW264.7) or cocultured with β-TC6 (Co-RAW264.7) (n = 3). (F) Flow cytometry measured the transfer of mitochondria from Ins2p-mMito-DsRed2-labeled β cells to CD11b + F4/80 + macrophages isolated from mice islets and quantified the mean fluorescence intensity of mtDsRed2 (n = 6). (G) Representative confocal images of insulin immunofluorescence staining of mtDsRed2-labeled isolated islets (left). Flow cytometry measured mtDsRed2 in BMDM from the transwell system co-cultured with or without mtDsRed2-labeled isolated islets for 24 h (right) (n = 5). (H) The coculture and transwell culture systems determine the form of mitochondrial transfer. The mean fluorescence intensity of mtDsRed2 in RAW264.7 was analyzed by flow cytometry (n = 5). (I) Experimental schematic for collecting extracellular vesicles (EVs) from β cell-conditioned medium. (J) Proteomic analysis of mEVs. The six most representative cellular components are shown. Data are obtained from a pool of mEVs derived from β cells. (K) Representative confocal microscopy pictures of EVs from mtDsRed2-labeled β cells stained with DIO (n = 3). (L) Representative transmission electron microscopy image of EVs. The red arrow shows mitochondria in the EVs (n = 3). (M) Representative Western blot of Large EVs filtrated with 0.22 μm pore-size filter or not. CD63 and <t>CD81</t> were used as markers of EVs, and TOM20 stands for mitochondria (n = 3). (N) Mitochondria membrane potential detection of β cells treated with or without PA and EVs from these β cells (n = 3). (O) Mitochondrial ROS content of EVs, from β cells treated with PA or not, was analyzed by MitoSOX staining (n = 6). Data are presented as the means ± SEMs. For D, E, F, G and O, statistical significance was calculated using Student's unpaired two-tailed t -test. For N, statistical significance was calculated using one-way ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc comparison. ∗∗ P < 0.01, ∗∗∗ P < 0.001.
    Cd81, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 3 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/cd81/product/MedChemExpress
    Average 93 stars, based on 3 article reviews
    cd81 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    93/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Islet regeneration protein Reg3g promotes macrophage clearance of β cell-derived dysfunctional mitochondria-rich vesicles to mitigate T2DM"

    Article Title: Islet regeneration protein Reg3g promotes macrophage clearance of β cell-derived dysfunctional mitochondria-rich vesicles to mitigate T2DM

    Journal: Redox Biology

    doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2025.103996

    Macrophages ingest β cell-derived dysfunctional mitochondria in the form of extracellular vesicles. (A) Generation of mtDsRed2-labeled MIN6 cells, cocultured with DIO-labeled BMDM for indicated time. (B) Representative confocal images of BMDM incubated with MIN6 cells (described in A) for 0.5, 12, and 24 h (n = 3). (C) Time-lapse confocal imaging revealing a mitochondria uptake event in macrophage. (D) qPCR analysis using specific primers for mtDNA from RAW264.7 and β-TC6 (n = 3). (E) qPCR analysis of mtDNA from β-TC6 in RAW264.7 individual cultured (Mon-RAW264.7) or cocultured with β-TC6 (Co-RAW264.7) (n = 3). (F) Flow cytometry measured the transfer of mitochondria from Ins2p-mMito-DsRed2-labeled β cells to CD11b + F4/80 + macrophages isolated from mice islets and quantified the mean fluorescence intensity of mtDsRed2 (n = 6). (G) Representative confocal images of insulin immunofluorescence staining of mtDsRed2-labeled isolated islets (left). Flow cytometry measured mtDsRed2 in BMDM from the transwell system co-cultured with or without mtDsRed2-labeled isolated islets for 24 h (right) (n = 5). (H) The coculture and transwell culture systems determine the form of mitochondrial transfer. The mean fluorescence intensity of mtDsRed2 in RAW264.7 was analyzed by flow cytometry (n = 5). (I) Experimental schematic for collecting extracellular vesicles (EVs) from β cell-conditioned medium. (J) Proteomic analysis of mEVs. The six most representative cellular components are shown. Data are obtained from a pool of mEVs derived from β cells. (K) Representative confocal microscopy pictures of EVs from mtDsRed2-labeled β cells stained with DIO (n = 3). (L) Representative transmission electron microscopy image of EVs. The red arrow shows mitochondria in the EVs (n = 3). (M) Representative Western blot of Large EVs filtrated with 0.22 μm pore-size filter or not. CD63 and CD81 were used as markers of EVs, and TOM20 stands for mitochondria (n = 3). (N) Mitochondria membrane potential detection of β cells treated with or without PA and EVs from these β cells (n = 3). (O) Mitochondrial ROS content of EVs, from β cells treated with PA or not, was analyzed by MitoSOX staining (n = 6). Data are presented as the means ± SEMs. For D, E, F, G and O, statistical significance was calculated using Student's unpaired two-tailed t -test. For N, statistical significance was calculated using one-way ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc comparison. ∗∗ P < 0.01, ∗∗∗ P < 0.001.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Macrophages ingest β cell-derived dysfunctional mitochondria in the form of extracellular vesicles. (A) Generation of mtDsRed2-labeled MIN6 cells, cocultured with DIO-labeled BMDM for indicated time. (B) Representative confocal images of BMDM incubated with MIN6 cells (described in A) for 0.5, 12, and 24 h (n = 3). (C) Time-lapse confocal imaging revealing a mitochondria uptake event in macrophage. (D) qPCR analysis using specific primers for mtDNA from RAW264.7 and β-TC6 (n = 3). (E) qPCR analysis of mtDNA from β-TC6 in RAW264.7 individual cultured (Mon-RAW264.7) or cocultured with β-TC6 (Co-RAW264.7) (n = 3). (F) Flow cytometry measured the transfer of mitochondria from Ins2p-mMito-DsRed2-labeled β cells to CD11b + F4/80 + macrophages isolated from mice islets and quantified the mean fluorescence intensity of mtDsRed2 (n = 6). (G) Representative confocal images of insulin immunofluorescence staining of mtDsRed2-labeled isolated islets (left). Flow cytometry measured mtDsRed2 in BMDM from the transwell system co-cultured with or without mtDsRed2-labeled isolated islets for 24 h (right) (n = 5). (H) The coculture and transwell culture systems determine the form of mitochondrial transfer. The mean fluorescence intensity of mtDsRed2 in RAW264.7 was analyzed by flow cytometry (n = 5). (I) Experimental schematic for collecting extracellular vesicles (EVs) from β cell-conditioned medium. (J) Proteomic analysis of mEVs. The six most representative cellular components are shown. Data are obtained from a pool of mEVs derived from β cells. (K) Representative confocal microscopy pictures of EVs from mtDsRed2-labeled β cells stained with DIO (n = 3). (L) Representative transmission electron microscopy image of EVs. The red arrow shows mitochondria in the EVs (n = 3). (M) Representative Western blot of Large EVs filtrated with 0.22 μm pore-size filter or not. CD63 and CD81 were used as markers of EVs, and TOM20 stands for mitochondria (n = 3). (N) Mitochondria membrane potential detection of β cells treated with or without PA and EVs from these β cells (n = 3). (O) Mitochondrial ROS content of EVs, from β cells treated with PA or not, was analyzed by MitoSOX staining (n = 6). Data are presented as the means ± SEMs. For D, E, F, G and O, statistical significance was calculated using Student's unpaired two-tailed t -test. For N, statistical significance was calculated using one-way ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc comparison. ∗∗ P < 0.01, ∗∗∗ P < 0.001.

    Techniques Used: Derivative Assay, Labeling, Incubation, Imaging, Cell Culture, Flow Cytometry, Isolation, Fluorescence, Immunofluorescence, Staining, Confocal Microscopy, Transmission Assay, Electron Microscopy, Western Blot, Pore Size, Membrane, Two Tailed Test, Comparison



    Similar Products

    93
    MedChemExpress cd81
    Macrophages ingest β cell-derived dysfunctional mitochondria in the form of extracellular vesicles. (A) Generation of mtDsRed2-labeled MIN6 cells, cocultured with DIO-labeled BMDM for indicated time. (B) Representative confocal images of BMDM incubated with MIN6 cells (described in A) for 0.5, 12, and 24 h (n = 3). (C) Time-lapse confocal imaging revealing a mitochondria uptake event in macrophage. (D) qPCR analysis using specific primers for mtDNA from RAW264.7 and β-TC6 (n = 3). (E) qPCR analysis of mtDNA from β-TC6 in RAW264.7 individual cultured (Mon-RAW264.7) or cocultured with β-TC6 (Co-RAW264.7) (n = 3). (F) Flow cytometry measured the transfer of mitochondria from Ins2p-mMito-DsRed2-labeled β cells to CD11b + F4/80 + macrophages isolated from mice islets and quantified the mean fluorescence intensity of mtDsRed2 (n = 6). (G) Representative confocal images of insulin immunofluorescence staining of mtDsRed2-labeled isolated islets (left). Flow cytometry measured mtDsRed2 in BMDM from the transwell system co-cultured with or without mtDsRed2-labeled isolated islets for 24 h (right) (n = 5). (H) The coculture and transwell culture systems determine the form of mitochondrial transfer. The mean fluorescence intensity of mtDsRed2 in RAW264.7 was analyzed by flow cytometry (n = 5). (I) Experimental schematic for collecting extracellular vesicles (EVs) from β cell-conditioned medium. (J) Proteomic analysis of mEVs. The six most representative cellular components are shown. Data are obtained from a pool of mEVs derived from β cells. (K) Representative confocal microscopy pictures of EVs from mtDsRed2-labeled β cells stained with DIO (n = 3). (L) Representative transmission electron microscopy image of EVs. The red arrow shows mitochondria in the EVs (n = 3). (M) Representative Western blot of Large EVs filtrated with 0.22 μm pore-size filter or not. CD63 and <t>CD81</t> were used as markers of EVs, and TOM20 stands for mitochondria (n = 3). (N) Mitochondria membrane potential detection of β cells treated with or without PA and EVs from these β cells (n = 3). (O) Mitochondrial ROS content of EVs, from β cells treated with PA or not, was analyzed by MitoSOX staining (n = 6). Data are presented as the means ± SEMs. For D, E, F, G and O, statistical significance was calculated using Student's unpaired two-tailed t -test. For N, statistical significance was calculated using one-way ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc comparison. ∗∗ P < 0.01, ∗∗∗ P < 0.001.
    Cd81, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/cd81/product/MedChemExpress
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    cd81 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    99
    NSJ Bioreagents cd81 antibody
    Macrophages ingest β cell-derived dysfunctional mitochondria in the form of extracellular vesicles. (A) Generation of mtDsRed2-labeled MIN6 cells, cocultured with DIO-labeled BMDM for indicated time. (B) Representative confocal images of BMDM incubated with MIN6 cells (described in A) for 0.5, 12, and 24 h (n = 3). (C) Time-lapse confocal imaging revealing a mitochondria uptake event in macrophage. (D) qPCR analysis using specific primers for mtDNA from RAW264.7 and β-TC6 (n = 3). (E) qPCR analysis of mtDNA from β-TC6 in RAW264.7 individual cultured (Mon-RAW264.7) or cocultured with β-TC6 (Co-RAW264.7) (n = 3). (F) Flow cytometry measured the transfer of mitochondria from Ins2p-mMito-DsRed2-labeled β cells to CD11b + F4/80 + macrophages isolated from mice islets and quantified the mean fluorescence intensity of mtDsRed2 (n = 6). (G) Representative confocal images of insulin immunofluorescence staining of mtDsRed2-labeled isolated islets (left). Flow cytometry measured mtDsRed2 in BMDM from the transwell system co-cultured with or without mtDsRed2-labeled isolated islets for 24 h (right) (n = 5). (H) The coculture and transwell culture systems determine the form of mitochondrial transfer. The mean fluorescence intensity of mtDsRed2 in RAW264.7 was analyzed by flow cytometry (n = 5). (I) Experimental schematic for collecting extracellular vesicles (EVs) from β cell-conditioned medium. (J) Proteomic analysis of mEVs. The six most representative cellular components are shown. Data are obtained from a pool of mEVs derived from β cells. (K) Representative confocal microscopy pictures of EVs from mtDsRed2-labeled β cells stained with DIO (n = 3). (L) Representative transmission electron microscopy image of EVs. The red arrow shows mitochondria in the EVs (n = 3). (M) Representative Western blot of Large EVs filtrated with 0.22 μm pore-size filter or not. CD63 and <t>CD81</t> were used as markers of EVs, and TOM20 stands for mitochondria (n = 3). (N) Mitochondria membrane potential detection of β cells treated with or without PA and EVs from these β cells (n = 3). (O) Mitochondrial ROS content of EVs, from β cells treated with PA or not, was analyzed by MitoSOX staining (n = 6). Data are presented as the means ± SEMs. For D, E, F, G and O, statistical significance was calculated using Student's unpaired two-tailed t -test. For N, statistical significance was calculated using one-way ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc comparison. ∗∗ P < 0.01, ∗∗∗ P < 0.001.
    Cd81 Antibody, supplied by NSJ Bioreagents, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/cd81 antibody/product/NSJ Bioreagents
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    cd81 antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    Bio-Rad cd81
    The diameter and concentration of particles present in EV preparation were determined by nanoparticle analysis and immunoblotting with EV-specific markers. EV concentration by particle diameter was obtained from Nanosight (A) after isolation from R-28 cells shown as magnified at 10×, Scale bar: 50 µm (B). EVs were enriched for the EV marker <t>CD81</t> compared to R-28 cell lysates when the same density of protein was loaded (C). Over three separate isolations, the average concentration (D) and size of the EVs (E) were determined by Nanosight ( n = 3). Electron microscopic imaging of the R-28 cells with EVs on the cell surface is visible (inset; F), and EVs were also detected in the purified EV preparation (G). EV: Extracellular vesicle.
    Cd81, supplied by Bio-Rad, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/cd81/product/Bio-Rad
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    cd81 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    Bio-Rad hamster
    The diameter and concentration of particles present in EV preparation were determined by nanoparticle analysis and immunoblotting with EV-specific markers. EV concentration by particle diameter was obtained from Nanosight (A) after isolation from R-28 cells shown as magnified at 10×, Scale bar: 50 µm (B). EVs were enriched for the EV marker <t>CD81</t> compared to R-28 cell lysates when the same density of protein was loaded (C). Over three separate isolations, the average concentration (D) and size of the EVs (E) were determined by Nanosight ( n = 3). Electron microscopic imaging of the R-28 cells with EVs on the cell surface is visible (inset; F), and EVs were also detected in the purified EV preparation (G). EV: Extracellular vesicle.
    Hamster, supplied by Bio-Rad, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/hamster/product/Bio-Rad
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    hamster - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    cd81  (Bioss)
    93
    Bioss cd81
    The diameter and concentration of particles present in EV preparation were determined by nanoparticle analysis and immunoblotting with EV-specific markers. EV concentration by particle diameter was obtained from Nanosight (A) after isolation from R-28 cells shown as magnified at 10×, Scale bar: 50 µm (B). EVs were enriched for the EV marker <t>CD81</t> compared to R-28 cell lysates when the same density of protein was loaded (C). Over three separate isolations, the average concentration (D) and size of the EVs (E) were determined by Nanosight ( n = 3). Electron microscopic imaging of the R-28 cells with EVs on the cell surface is visible (inset; F), and EVs were also detected in the purified EV preparation (G). EV: Extracellular vesicle.
    Cd81, supplied by Bioss, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/cd81/product/Bioss
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    cd81 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    Cusabio cd81
    The diameter and concentration of particles present in EV preparation were determined by nanoparticle analysis and immunoblotting with EV-specific markers. EV concentration by particle diameter was obtained from Nanosight (A) after isolation from R-28 cells shown as magnified at 10×, Scale bar: 50 µm (B). EVs were enriched for the EV marker <t>CD81</t> compared to R-28 cell lysates when the same density of protein was loaded (C). Over three separate isolations, the average concentration (D) and size of the EVs (E) were determined by Nanosight ( n = 3). Electron microscopic imaging of the R-28 cells with EVs on the cell surface is visible (inset; F), and EVs were also detected in the purified EV preparation (G). EV: Extracellular vesicle.
    Cd81, supplied by Cusabio, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/cd81/product/Cusabio
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    cd81 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    Proteintech anti cd81
    The diameter and concentration of particles present in EV preparation were determined by nanoparticle analysis and immunoblotting with EV-specific markers. EV concentration by particle diameter was obtained from Nanosight (A) after isolation from R-28 cells shown as magnified at 10×, Scale bar: 50 µm (B). EVs were enriched for the EV marker <t>CD81</t> compared to R-28 cell lysates when the same density of protein was loaded (C). Over three separate isolations, the average concentration (D) and size of the EVs (E) were determined by Nanosight ( n = 3). Electron microscopic imaging of the R-28 cells with EVs on the cell surface is visible (inset; F), and EVs were also detected in the purified EV preparation (G). EV: Extracellular vesicle.
    Anti Cd81, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/anti cd81/product/Proteintech
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti cd81 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    Proteintech cd81
    The diameter and concentration of particles present in EV preparation were determined by nanoparticle analysis and immunoblotting with EV-specific markers. EV concentration by particle diameter was obtained from Nanosight (A) after isolation from R-28 cells shown as magnified at 10×, Scale bar: 50 µm (B). EVs were enriched for the EV marker <t>CD81</t> compared to R-28 cell lysates when the same density of protein was loaded (C). Over three separate isolations, the average concentration (D) and size of the EVs (E) were determined by Nanosight ( n = 3). Electron microscopic imaging of the R-28 cells with EVs on the cell surface is visible (inset; F), and EVs were also detected in the purified EV preparation (G). EV: Extracellular vesicle.
    Cd81, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/cd81/product/Proteintech
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    cd81 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Macrophages ingest β cell-derived dysfunctional mitochondria in the form of extracellular vesicles. (A) Generation of mtDsRed2-labeled MIN6 cells, cocultured with DIO-labeled BMDM for indicated time. (B) Representative confocal images of BMDM incubated with MIN6 cells (described in A) for 0.5, 12, and 24 h (n = 3). (C) Time-lapse confocal imaging revealing a mitochondria uptake event in macrophage. (D) qPCR analysis using specific primers for mtDNA from RAW264.7 and β-TC6 (n = 3). (E) qPCR analysis of mtDNA from β-TC6 in RAW264.7 individual cultured (Mon-RAW264.7) or cocultured with β-TC6 (Co-RAW264.7) (n = 3). (F) Flow cytometry measured the transfer of mitochondria from Ins2p-mMito-DsRed2-labeled β cells to CD11b + F4/80 + macrophages isolated from mice islets and quantified the mean fluorescence intensity of mtDsRed2 (n = 6). (G) Representative confocal images of insulin immunofluorescence staining of mtDsRed2-labeled isolated islets (left). Flow cytometry measured mtDsRed2 in BMDM from the transwell system co-cultured with or without mtDsRed2-labeled isolated islets for 24 h (right) (n = 5). (H) The coculture and transwell culture systems determine the form of mitochondrial transfer. The mean fluorescence intensity of mtDsRed2 in RAW264.7 was analyzed by flow cytometry (n = 5). (I) Experimental schematic for collecting extracellular vesicles (EVs) from β cell-conditioned medium. (J) Proteomic analysis of mEVs. The six most representative cellular components are shown. Data are obtained from a pool of mEVs derived from β cells. (K) Representative confocal microscopy pictures of EVs from mtDsRed2-labeled β cells stained with DIO (n = 3). (L) Representative transmission electron microscopy image of EVs. The red arrow shows mitochondria in the EVs (n = 3). (M) Representative Western blot of Large EVs filtrated with 0.22 μm pore-size filter or not. CD63 and CD81 were used as markers of EVs, and TOM20 stands for mitochondria (n = 3). (N) Mitochondria membrane potential detection of β cells treated with or without PA and EVs from these β cells (n = 3). (O) Mitochondrial ROS content of EVs, from β cells treated with PA or not, was analyzed by MitoSOX staining (n = 6). Data are presented as the means ± SEMs. For D, E, F, G and O, statistical significance was calculated using Student's unpaired two-tailed t -test. For N, statistical significance was calculated using one-way ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc comparison. ∗∗ P < 0.01, ∗∗∗ P < 0.001.

    Journal: Redox Biology

    Article Title: Islet regeneration protein Reg3g promotes macrophage clearance of β cell-derived dysfunctional mitochondria-rich vesicles to mitigate T2DM

    doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2025.103996

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Macrophages ingest β cell-derived dysfunctional mitochondria in the form of extracellular vesicles. (A) Generation of mtDsRed2-labeled MIN6 cells, cocultured with DIO-labeled BMDM for indicated time. (B) Representative confocal images of BMDM incubated with MIN6 cells (described in A) for 0.5, 12, and 24 h (n = 3). (C) Time-lapse confocal imaging revealing a mitochondria uptake event in macrophage. (D) qPCR analysis using specific primers for mtDNA from RAW264.7 and β-TC6 (n = 3). (E) qPCR analysis of mtDNA from β-TC6 in RAW264.7 individual cultured (Mon-RAW264.7) or cocultured with β-TC6 (Co-RAW264.7) (n = 3). (F) Flow cytometry measured the transfer of mitochondria from Ins2p-mMito-DsRed2-labeled β cells to CD11b + F4/80 + macrophages isolated from mice islets and quantified the mean fluorescence intensity of mtDsRed2 (n = 6). (G) Representative confocal images of insulin immunofluorescence staining of mtDsRed2-labeled isolated islets (left). Flow cytometry measured mtDsRed2 in BMDM from the transwell system co-cultured with or without mtDsRed2-labeled isolated islets for 24 h (right) (n = 5). (H) The coculture and transwell culture systems determine the form of mitochondrial transfer. The mean fluorescence intensity of mtDsRed2 in RAW264.7 was analyzed by flow cytometry (n = 5). (I) Experimental schematic for collecting extracellular vesicles (EVs) from β cell-conditioned medium. (J) Proteomic analysis of mEVs. The six most representative cellular components are shown. Data are obtained from a pool of mEVs derived from β cells. (K) Representative confocal microscopy pictures of EVs from mtDsRed2-labeled β cells stained with DIO (n = 3). (L) Representative transmission electron microscopy image of EVs. The red arrow shows mitochondria in the EVs (n = 3). (M) Representative Western blot of Large EVs filtrated with 0.22 μm pore-size filter or not. CD63 and CD81 were used as markers of EVs, and TOM20 stands for mitochondria (n = 3). (N) Mitochondria membrane potential detection of β cells treated with or without PA and EVs from these β cells (n = 3). (O) Mitochondrial ROS content of EVs, from β cells treated with PA or not, was analyzed by MitoSOX staining (n = 6). Data are presented as the means ± SEMs. For D, E, F, G and O, statistical significance was calculated using Student's unpaired two-tailed t -test. For N, statistical significance was calculated using one-way ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc comparison. ∗∗ P < 0.01, ∗∗∗ P < 0.001.

    Article Snippet: Antibodies used to determine protein expression list as follows: CD63 (Sc-5275, Santa), CD81 (HY– P80608 , MCE), LC3A/B (#12741, CST; #AF5402, Affinity Biosciences), TOM20 (66777-1-Ig, Proteintech), P2RX7 (28207-1-AP, Proteintech), NF-κB (#8242, CST), p–NF–κB (#3033, CST).

    Techniques: Derivative Assay, Labeling, Incubation, Imaging, Cell Culture, Flow Cytometry, Isolation, Fluorescence, Immunofluorescence, Staining, Confocal Microscopy, Transmission Assay, Electron Microscopy, Western Blot, Pore Size, Membrane, Two Tailed Test, Comparison

    The diameter and concentration of particles present in EV preparation were determined by nanoparticle analysis and immunoblotting with EV-specific markers. EV concentration by particle diameter was obtained from Nanosight (A) after isolation from R-28 cells shown as magnified at 10×, Scale bar: 50 µm (B). EVs were enriched for the EV marker CD81 compared to R-28 cell lysates when the same density of protein was loaded (C). Over three separate isolations, the average concentration (D) and size of the EVs (E) were determined by Nanosight ( n = 3). Electron microscopic imaging of the R-28 cells with EVs on the cell surface is visible (inset; F), and EVs were also detected in the purified EV preparation (G). EV: Extracellular vesicle.

    Journal: Neural Regeneration Research

    Article Title: R-28 cell-derived extracellular vesicles protect retinal ganglion cells in glaucoma

    doi: 10.4103/NRR.NRR-D-24-00709

    Figure Lengend Snippet: The diameter and concentration of particles present in EV preparation were determined by nanoparticle analysis and immunoblotting with EV-specific markers. EV concentration by particle diameter was obtained from Nanosight (A) after isolation from R-28 cells shown as magnified at 10×, Scale bar: 50 µm (B). EVs were enriched for the EV marker CD81 compared to R-28 cell lysates when the same density of protein was loaded (C). Over three separate isolations, the average concentration (D) and size of the EVs (E) were determined by Nanosight ( n = 3). Electron microscopic imaging of the R-28 cells with EVs on the cell surface is visible (inset; F), and EVs were also detected in the purified EV preparation (G). EV: Extracellular vesicle.

    Article Snippet: CD81 , Hamster , BioRad, Watford, UK , 1:100 , MCA1846 , N/A.

    Techniques: Concentration Assay, Western Blot, Isolation, Marker, Imaging, Purification