Review




Structured Review

Bio-Rad cd81
The diameter and concentration of particles present in EV preparation were determined by nanoparticle analysis and immunoblotting with EV-specific markers. EV concentration by particle diameter was obtained from Nanosight (A) after isolation from R-28 cells shown as magnified at 10×, Scale bar: 50 µm (B). EVs were enriched for the EV marker <t>CD81</t> compared to R-28 cell lysates when the same density of protein was loaded (C). Over three separate isolations, the average concentration (D) and size of the EVs (E) were determined by Nanosight ( n = 3). Electron microscopic imaging of the R-28 cells with EVs on the cell surface is visible (inset; F), and EVs were also detected in the purified EV preparation (G). EV: Extracellular vesicle.
Cd81, supplied by Bio-Rad, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 21 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/cd81/product/Bio-Rad
Average 93 stars, based on 21 article reviews
cd81 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
93/100 stars

Images

1) Product Images from "R-28 cell-derived extracellular vesicles protect retinal ganglion cells in glaucoma"

Article Title: R-28 cell-derived extracellular vesicles protect retinal ganglion cells in glaucoma

Journal: Neural Regeneration Research

doi: 10.4103/NRR.NRR-D-24-00709

The diameter and concentration of particles present in EV preparation were determined by nanoparticle analysis and immunoblotting with EV-specific markers. EV concentration by particle diameter was obtained from Nanosight (A) after isolation from R-28 cells shown as magnified at 10×, Scale bar: 50 µm (B). EVs were enriched for the EV marker CD81 compared to R-28 cell lysates when the same density of protein was loaded (C). Over three separate isolations, the average concentration (D) and size of the EVs (E) were determined by Nanosight ( n = 3). Electron microscopic imaging of the R-28 cells with EVs on the cell surface is visible (inset; F), and EVs were also detected in the purified EV preparation (G). EV: Extracellular vesicle.
Figure Legend Snippet: The diameter and concentration of particles present in EV preparation were determined by nanoparticle analysis and immunoblotting with EV-specific markers. EV concentration by particle diameter was obtained from Nanosight (A) after isolation from R-28 cells shown as magnified at 10×, Scale bar: 50 µm (B). EVs were enriched for the EV marker CD81 compared to R-28 cell lysates when the same density of protein was loaded (C). Over three separate isolations, the average concentration (D) and size of the EVs (E) were determined by Nanosight ( n = 3). Electron microscopic imaging of the R-28 cells with EVs on the cell surface is visible (inset; F), and EVs were also detected in the purified EV preparation (G). EV: Extracellular vesicle.

Techniques Used: Concentration Assay, Western Blot, Isolation, Marker, Imaging, Purification



Similar Products

93
MedChemExpress cd81
Macrophages ingest β cell-derived dysfunctional mitochondria in the form of extracellular vesicles. (A) Generation of mtDsRed2-labeled MIN6 cells, cocultured with DIO-labeled BMDM for indicated time. (B) Representative confocal images of BMDM incubated with MIN6 cells (described in A) for 0.5, 12, and 24 h (n = 3). (C) Time-lapse confocal imaging revealing a mitochondria uptake event in macrophage. (D) qPCR analysis using specific primers for mtDNA from RAW264.7 and β-TC6 (n = 3). (E) qPCR analysis of mtDNA from β-TC6 in RAW264.7 individual cultured (Mon-RAW264.7) or cocultured with β-TC6 (Co-RAW264.7) (n = 3). (F) Flow cytometry measured the transfer of mitochondria from Ins2p-mMito-DsRed2-labeled β cells to CD11b + F4/80 + macrophages isolated from mice islets and quantified the mean fluorescence intensity of mtDsRed2 (n = 6). (G) Representative confocal images of insulin immunofluorescence staining of mtDsRed2-labeled isolated islets (left). Flow cytometry measured mtDsRed2 in BMDM from the transwell system co-cultured with or without mtDsRed2-labeled isolated islets for 24 h (right) (n = 5). (H) The coculture and transwell culture systems determine the form of mitochondrial transfer. The mean fluorescence intensity of mtDsRed2 in RAW264.7 was analyzed by flow cytometry (n = 5). (I) Experimental schematic for collecting extracellular vesicles (EVs) from β cell-conditioned medium. (J) Proteomic analysis of mEVs. The six most representative cellular components are shown. Data are obtained from a pool of mEVs derived from β cells. (K) Representative confocal microscopy pictures of EVs from mtDsRed2-labeled β cells stained with DIO (n = 3). (L) Representative transmission electron microscopy image of EVs. The red arrow shows mitochondria in the EVs (n = 3). (M) Representative Western blot of Large EVs filtrated with 0.22 μm pore-size filter or not. CD63 and <t>CD81</t> were used as markers of EVs, and TOM20 stands for mitochondria (n = 3). (N) Mitochondria membrane potential detection of β cells treated with or without PA and EVs from these β cells (n = 3). (O) Mitochondrial ROS content of EVs, from β cells treated with PA or not, was analyzed by MitoSOX staining (n = 6). Data are presented as the means ± SEMs. For D, E, F, G and O, statistical significance was calculated using Student's unpaired two-tailed t -test. For N, statistical significance was calculated using one-way ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc comparison. ∗∗ P < 0.01, ∗∗∗ P < 0.001.
Cd81, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/cd81/product/MedChemExpress
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cd81 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

99
NSJ Bioreagents cd81 antibody
Macrophages ingest β cell-derived dysfunctional mitochondria in the form of extracellular vesicles. (A) Generation of mtDsRed2-labeled MIN6 cells, cocultured with DIO-labeled BMDM for indicated time. (B) Representative confocal images of BMDM incubated with MIN6 cells (described in A) for 0.5, 12, and 24 h (n = 3). (C) Time-lapse confocal imaging revealing a mitochondria uptake event in macrophage. (D) qPCR analysis using specific primers for mtDNA from RAW264.7 and β-TC6 (n = 3). (E) qPCR analysis of mtDNA from β-TC6 in RAW264.7 individual cultured (Mon-RAW264.7) or cocultured with β-TC6 (Co-RAW264.7) (n = 3). (F) Flow cytometry measured the transfer of mitochondria from Ins2p-mMito-DsRed2-labeled β cells to CD11b + F4/80 + macrophages isolated from mice islets and quantified the mean fluorescence intensity of mtDsRed2 (n = 6). (G) Representative confocal images of insulin immunofluorescence staining of mtDsRed2-labeled isolated islets (left). Flow cytometry measured mtDsRed2 in BMDM from the transwell system co-cultured with or without mtDsRed2-labeled isolated islets for 24 h (right) (n = 5). (H) The coculture and transwell culture systems determine the form of mitochondrial transfer. The mean fluorescence intensity of mtDsRed2 in RAW264.7 was analyzed by flow cytometry (n = 5). (I) Experimental schematic for collecting extracellular vesicles (EVs) from β cell-conditioned medium. (J) Proteomic analysis of mEVs. The six most representative cellular components are shown. Data are obtained from a pool of mEVs derived from β cells. (K) Representative confocal microscopy pictures of EVs from mtDsRed2-labeled β cells stained with DIO (n = 3). (L) Representative transmission electron microscopy image of EVs. The red arrow shows mitochondria in the EVs (n = 3). (M) Representative Western blot of Large EVs filtrated with 0.22 μm pore-size filter or not. CD63 and <t>CD81</t> were used as markers of EVs, and TOM20 stands for mitochondria (n = 3). (N) Mitochondria membrane potential detection of β cells treated with or without PA and EVs from these β cells (n = 3). (O) Mitochondrial ROS content of EVs, from β cells treated with PA or not, was analyzed by MitoSOX staining (n = 6). Data are presented as the means ± SEMs. For D, E, F, G and O, statistical significance was calculated using Student's unpaired two-tailed t -test. For N, statistical significance was calculated using one-way ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc comparison. ∗∗ P < 0.01, ∗∗∗ P < 0.001.
Cd81 Antibody, supplied by NSJ Bioreagents, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/cd81 antibody/product/NSJ Bioreagents
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cd81 antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Bio-Rad cd81
The diameter and concentration of particles present in EV preparation were determined by nanoparticle analysis and immunoblotting with EV-specific markers. EV concentration by particle diameter was obtained from Nanosight (A) after isolation from R-28 cells shown as magnified at 10×, Scale bar: 50 µm (B). EVs were enriched for the EV marker <t>CD81</t> compared to R-28 cell lysates when the same density of protein was loaded (C). Over three separate isolations, the average concentration (D) and size of the EVs (E) were determined by Nanosight ( n = 3). Electron microscopic imaging of the R-28 cells with EVs on the cell surface is visible (inset; F), and EVs were also detected in the purified EV preparation (G). EV: Extracellular vesicle.
Cd81, supplied by Bio-Rad, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/cd81/product/Bio-Rad
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cd81 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Bio-Rad hamster
The diameter and concentration of particles present in EV preparation were determined by nanoparticle analysis and immunoblotting with EV-specific markers. EV concentration by particle diameter was obtained from Nanosight (A) after isolation from R-28 cells shown as magnified at 10×, Scale bar: 50 µm (B). EVs were enriched for the EV marker <t>CD81</t> compared to R-28 cell lysates when the same density of protein was loaded (C). Over three separate isolations, the average concentration (D) and size of the EVs (E) were determined by Nanosight ( n = 3). Electron microscopic imaging of the R-28 cells with EVs on the cell surface is visible (inset; F), and EVs were also detected in the purified EV preparation (G). EV: Extracellular vesicle.
Hamster, supplied by Bio-Rad, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/hamster/product/Bio-Rad
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
hamster - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

cd81  (Bioss)
93
Bioss cd81
The diameter and concentration of particles present in EV preparation were determined by nanoparticle analysis and immunoblotting with EV-specific markers. EV concentration by particle diameter was obtained from Nanosight (A) after isolation from R-28 cells shown as magnified at 10×, Scale bar: 50 µm (B). EVs were enriched for the EV marker <t>CD81</t> compared to R-28 cell lysates when the same density of protein was loaded (C). Over three separate isolations, the average concentration (D) and size of the EVs (E) were determined by Nanosight ( n = 3). Electron microscopic imaging of the R-28 cells with EVs on the cell surface is visible (inset; F), and EVs were also detected in the purified EV preparation (G). EV: Extracellular vesicle.
Cd81, supplied by Bioss, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/cd81/product/Bioss
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cd81 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
Cusabio cd81
The diameter and concentration of particles present in EV preparation were determined by nanoparticle analysis and immunoblotting with EV-specific markers. EV concentration by particle diameter was obtained from Nanosight (A) after isolation from R-28 cells shown as magnified at 10×, Scale bar: 50 µm (B). EVs were enriched for the EV marker <t>CD81</t> compared to R-28 cell lysates when the same density of protein was loaded (C). Over three separate isolations, the average concentration (D) and size of the EVs (E) were determined by Nanosight ( n = 3). Electron microscopic imaging of the R-28 cells with EVs on the cell surface is visible (inset; F), and EVs were also detected in the purified EV preparation (G). EV: Extracellular vesicle.
Cd81, supplied by Cusabio, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/cd81/product/Cusabio
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cd81 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Proteintech anti cd81
The diameter and concentration of particles present in EV preparation were determined by nanoparticle analysis and immunoblotting with EV-specific markers. EV concentration by particle diameter was obtained from Nanosight (A) after isolation from R-28 cells shown as magnified at 10×, Scale bar: 50 µm (B). EVs were enriched for the EV marker <t>CD81</t> compared to R-28 cell lysates when the same density of protein was loaded (C). Over three separate isolations, the average concentration (D) and size of the EVs (E) were determined by Nanosight ( n = 3). Electron microscopic imaging of the R-28 cells with EVs on the cell surface is visible (inset; F), and EVs were also detected in the purified EV preparation (G). EV: Extracellular vesicle.
Anti Cd81, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/anti cd81/product/Proteintech
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti cd81 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Proteintech cd81
The diameter and concentration of particles present in EV preparation were determined by nanoparticle analysis and immunoblotting with EV-specific markers. EV concentration by particle diameter was obtained from Nanosight (A) after isolation from R-28 cells shown as magnified at 10×, Scale bar: 50 µm (B). EVs were enriched for the EV marker <t>CD81</t> compared to R-28 cell lysates when the same density of protein was loaded (C). Over three separate isolations, the average concentration (D) and size of the EVs (E) were determined by Nanosight ( n = 3). Electron microscopic imaging of the R-28 cells with EVs on the cell surface is visible (inset; F), and EVs were also detected in the purified EV preparation (G). EV: Extracellular vesicle.
Cd81, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/cd81/product/Proteintech
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cd81 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Macrophages ingest β cell-derived dysfunctional mitochondria in the form of extracellular vesicles. (A) Generation of mtDsRed2-labeled MIN6 cells, cocultured with DIO-labeled BMDM for indicated time. (B) Representative confocal images of BMDM incubated with MIN6 cells (described in A) for 0.5, 12, and 24 h (n = 3). (C) Time-lapse confocal imaging revealing a mitochondria uptake event in macrophage. (D) qPCR analysis using specific primers for mtDNA from RAW264.7 and β-TC6 (n = 3). (E) qPCR analysis of mtDNA from β-TC6 in RAW264.7 individual cultured (Mon-RAW264.7) or cocultured with β-TC6 (Co-RAW264.7) (n = 3). (F) Flow cytometry measured the transfer of mitochondria from Ins2p-mMito-DsRed2-labeled β cells to CD11b + F4/80 + macrophages isolated from mice islets and quantified the mean fluorescence intensity of mtDsRed2 (n = 6). (G) Representative confocal images of insulin immunofluorescence staining of mtDsRed2-labeled isolated islets (left). Flow cytometry measured mtDsRed2 in BMDM from the transwell system co-cultured with or without mtDsRed2-labeled isolated islets for 24 h (right) (n = 5). (H) The coculture and transwell culture systems determine the form of mitochondrial transfer. The mean fluorescence intensity of mtDsRed2 in RAW264.7 was analyzed by flow cytometry (n = 5). (I) Experimental schematic for collecting extracellular vesicles (EVs) from β cell-conditioned medium. (J) Proteomic analysis of mEVs. The six most representative cellular components are shown. Data are obtained from a pool of mEVs derived from β cells. (K) Representative confocal microscopy pictures of EVs from mtDsRed2-labeled β cells stained with DIO (n = 3). (L) Representative transmission electron microscopy image of EVs. The red arrow shows mitochondria in the EVs (n = 3). (M) Representative Western blot of Large EVs filtrated with 0.22 μm pore-size filter or not. CD63 and CD81 were used as markers of EVs, and TOM20 stands for mitochondria (n = 3). (N) Mitochondria membrane potential detection of β cells treated with or without PA and EVs from these β cells (n = 3). (O) Mitochondrial ROS content of EVs, from β cells treated with PA or not, was analyzed by MitoSOX staining (n = 6). Data are presented as the means ± SEMs. For D, E, F, G and O, statistical significance was calculated using Student's unpaired two-tailed t -test. For N, statistical significance was calculated using one-way ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc comparison. ∗∗ P < 0.01, ∗∗∗ P < 0.001.

Journal: Redox Biology

Article Title: Islet regeneration protein Reg3g promotes macrophage clearance of β cell-derived dysfunctional mitochondria-rich vesicles to mitigate T2DM

doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2025.103996

Figure Lengend Snippet: Macrophages ingest β cell-derived dysfunctional mitochondria in the form of extracellular vesicles. (A) Generation of mtDsRed2-labeled MIN6 cells, cocultured with DIO-labeled BMDM for indicated time. (B) Representative confocal images of BMDM incubated with MIN6 cells (described in A) for 0.5, 12, and 24 h (n = 3). (C) Time-lapse confocal imaging revealing a mitochondria uptake event in macrophage. (D) qPCR analysis using specific primers for mtDNA from RAW264.7 and β-TC6 (n = 3). (E) qPCR analysis of mtDNA from β-TC6 in RAW264.7 individual cultured (Mon-RAW264.7) or cocultured with β-TC6 (Co-RAW264.7) (n = 3). (F) Flow cytometry measured the transfer of mitochondria from Ins2p-mMito-DsRed2-labeled β cells to CD11b + F4/80 + macrophages isolated from mice islets and quantified the mean fluorescence intensity of mtDsRed2 (n = 6). (G) Representative confocal images of insulin immunofluorescence staining of mtDsRed2-labeled isolated islets (left). Flow cytometry measured mtDsRed2 in BMDM from the transwell system co-cultured with or without mtDsRed2-labeled isolated islets for 24 h (right) (n = 5). (H) The coculture and transwell culture systems determine the form of mitochondrial transfer. The mean fluorescence intensity of mtDsRed2 in RAW264.7 was analyzed by flow cytometry (n = 5). (I) Experimental schematic for collecting extracellular vesicles (EVs) from β cell-conditioned medium. (J) Proteomic analysis of mEVs. The six most representative cellular components are shown. Data are obtained from a pool of mEVs derived from β cells. (K) Representative confocal microscopy pictures of EVs from mtDsRed2-labeled β cells stained with DIO (n = 3). (L) Representative transmission electron microscopy image of EVs. The red arrow shows mitochondria in the EVs (n = 3). (M) Representative Western blot of Large EVs filtrated with 0.22 μm pore-size filter or not. CD63 and CD81 were used as markers of EVs, and TOM20 stands for mitochondria (n = 3). (N) Mitochondria membrane potential detection of β cells treated with or without PA and EVs from these β cells (n = 3). (O) Mitochondrial ROS content of EVs, from β cells treated with PA or not, was analyzed by MitoSOX staining (n = 6). Data are presented as the means ± SEMs. For D, E, F, G and O, statistical significance was calculated using Student's unpaired two-tailed t -test. For N, statistical significance was calculated using one-way ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc comparison. ∗∗ P < 0.01, ∗∗∗ P < 0.001.

Article Snippet: Antibodies used to determine protein expression list as follows: CD63 (Sc-5275, Santa), CD81 (HY– P80608 , MCE), LC3A/B (#12741, CST; #AF5402, Affinity Biosciences), TOM20 (66777-1-Ig, Proteintech), P2RX7 (28207-1-AP, Proteintech), NF-κB (#8242, CST), p–NF–κB (#3033, CST).

Techniques: Derivative Assay, Labeling, Incubation, Imaging, Cell Culture, Flow Cytometry, Isolation, Fluorescence, Immunofluorescence, Staining, Confocal Microscopy, Transmission Assay, Electron Microscopy, Western Blot, Pore Size, Membrane, Two Tailed Test, Comparison

The diameter and concentration of particles present in EV preparation were determined by nanoparticle analysis and immunoblotting with EV-specific markers. EV concentration by particle diameter was obtained from Nanosight (A) after isolation from R-28 cells shown as magnified at 10×, Scale bar: 50 µm (B). EVs were enriched for the EV marker CD81 compared to R-28 cell lysates when the same density of protein was loaded (C). Over three separate isolations, the average concentration (D) and size of the EVs (E) were determined by Nanosight ( n = 3). Electron microscopic imaging of the R-28 cells with EVs on the cell surface is visible (inset; F), and EVs were also detected in the purified EV preparation (G). EV: Extracellular vesicle.

Journal: Neural Regeneration Research

Article Title: R-28 cell-derived extracellular vesicles protect retinal ganglion cells in glaucoma

doi: 10.4103/NRR.NRR-D-24-00709

Figure Lengend Snippet: The diameter and concentration of particles present in EV preparation were determined by nanoparticle analysis and immunoblotting with EV-specific markers. EV concentration by particle diameter was obtained from Nanosight (A) after isolation from R-28 cells shown as magnified at 10×, Scale bar: 50 µm (B). EVs were enriched for the EV marker CD81 compared to R-28 cell lysates when the same density of protein was loaded (C). Over three separate isolations, the average concentration (D) and size of the EVs (E) were determined by Nanosight ( n = 3). Electron microscopic imaging of the R-28 cells with EVs on the cell surface is visible (inset; F), and EVs were also detected in the purified EV preparation (G). EV: Extracellular vesicle.

Article Snippet: CD81 , Hamster , BioRad, Watford, UK , 1:100 , MCA1846 , N/A.

Techniques: Concentration Assay, Western Blot, Isolation, Marker, Imaging, Purification