Review




Structured Review

RStudio snptools
Snptools, supplied by RStudio, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/snptools/product/RStudio
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
snptools - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars

Images



Similar Products

90
RStudio snptools
Snptools, supplied by RStudio, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/snptools/product/RStudio
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
snptools - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
SourceForge net snptools
Overview of the <t>SNPTools</t> Pipeline. The SNPTools pipeline utilizes binary sequence map (BAM) files and then processes them through four modular steps: calculation of effective base depth (EBD), SNP site discovery, BAM-specific binomial mixture modeling (BBMM) to calculate genotype likelihoods, and genotype and haplotype imputation.
Snptools, supplied by SourceForge net, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/snptools/product/SourceForge net
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
snptools - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Curagen Inc snptool algorithm
Overview of the <t>SNPTools</t> Pipeline. The SNPTools pipeline utilizes binary sequence map (BAM) files and then processes them through four modular steps: calculation of effective base depth (EBD), SNP site discovery, BAM-specific binomial mixture modeling (BBMM) to calculate genotype likelihoods, and genotype and haplotype imputation.
Snptool Algorithm, supplied by Curagen Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/snptool algorithm/product/Curagen Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
snptool algorithm - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Curagen Inc deep snp mining (dsm) in curagen's proprietary snptool algorithm
Overview of the <t>SNPTools</t> Pipeline. The SNPTools pipeline utilizes binary sequence map (BAM) files and then processes them through four modular steps: calculation of effective base depth (EBD), SNP site discovery, BAM-specific binomial mixture modeling (BBMM) to calculate genotype likelihoods, and genotype and haplotype imputation.
Deep Snp Mining (Dsm) In Curagen's Proprietary Snptool Algorithm, supplied by Curagen Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/deep snp mining (dsm) in curagen's proprietary snptool algorithm/product/Curagen Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
deep snp mining (dsm) in curagen's proprietary snptool algorithm - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Curagen Inc snptool
Overview of the <t>SNPTools</t> Pipeline. The SNPTools pipeline utilizes binary sequence map (BAM) files and then processes them through four modular steps: calculation of effective base depth (EBD), SNP site discovery, BAM-specific binomial mixture modeling (BBMM) to calculate genotype likelihoods, and genotype and haplotype imputation.
Snptool, supplied by Curagen Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/snptool/product/Curagen Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
snptool - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Overview of the SNPTools Pipeline. The SNPTools pipeline utilizes binary sequence map (BAM) files and then processes them through four modular steps: calculation of effective base depth (EBD), SNP site discovery, BAM-specific binomial mixture modeling (BBMM) to calculate genotype likelihoods, and genotype and haplotype imputation.

Journal: Genome Research

Article Title: An integrative variant analysis pipeline for accurate genotype/haplotype inference in population NGS data

doi: 10.1101/gr.146084.112

Figure Lengend Snippet: Overview of the SNPTools Pipeline. The SNPTools pipeline utilizes binary sequence map (BAM) files and then processes them through four modular steps: calculation of effective base depth (EBD), SNP site discovery, BAM-specific binomial mixture modeling (BBMM) to calculate genotype likelihoods, and genotype and haplotype imputation.

Article Snippet: SNPTools can be found at http://sourceforge.net/projects/snptools/ .

Techniques: Sequencing

SNP statistics for sites discovered in 1000G PHASE1 with SNPTools. SNP sites were discovered using the variance ratio statistic. The unfiltered autosomal site list was composed of 34,656,295 candidate SNP sites, with an average Ti/Tv ratio of 2.11. SNPs were filtered using four criteria (Supplemental Material) to produce a final list of 32,737,954 SNPs with a Ti/Tv ratio of 2.15. ( A ) We found that 78.3% of the ∼32.7 million SNP were novel when evaluated with dbSNP 129. These novel sites had a Ti/Tv ratio of 2.15, which was comparable to the Ti/Tv of known sites, 2.17. ( B ) The site frequency spectrum of our discovered SNPs reveals that most novel SNPs were rare with MAF < 0.5%. ( C ) We provide discovery statistics for Chr20 and for the whole genome. Known SNPs are defined as being present in dbSNP129. SNPTools had a low false-discovery rate of 1284 sites out of 99,817 monomorphic OMNI sites.

Journal: Genome Research

Article Title: An integrative variant analysis pipeline for accurate genotype/haplotype inference in population NGS data

doi: 10.1101/gr.146084.112

Figure Lengend Snippet: SNP statistics for sites discovered in 1000G PHASE1 with SNPTools. SNP sites were discovered using the variance ratio statistic. The unfiltered autosomal site list was composed of 34,656,295 candidate SNP sites, with an average Ti/Tv ratio of 2.11. SNPs were filtered using four criteria (Supplemental Material) to produce a final list of 32,737,954 SNPs with a Ti/Tv ratio of 2.15. ( A ) We found that 78.3% of the ∼32.7 million SNP were novel when evaluated with dbSNP 129. These novel sites had a Ti/Tv ratio of 2.15, which was comparable to the Ti/Tv of known sites, 2.17. ( B ) The site frequency spectrum of our discovered SNPs reveals that most novel SNPs were rare with MAF < 0.5%. ( C ) We provide discovery statistics for Chr20 and for the whole genome. Known SNPs are defined as being present in dbSNP129. SNPTools had a low false-discovery rate of 1284 sites out of 99,817 monomorphic OMNI sites.

Article Snippet: SNPTools can be found at http://sourceforge.net/projects/snptools/ .

Techniques:

Journal: Genome Research

Article Title: An integrative variant analysis pipeline for accurate genotype/haplotype inference in population NGS data

doi: 10.1101/gr.146084.112

Figure Lengend Snippet: Genotype discordance rates for SNPTools and Beagle

Article Snippet: SNPTools can be found at http://sourceforge.net/projects/snptools/ .

Techniques:

Haplotype phasing accuracy evaluation. SNPTools and Beagle are compared against the benchmark haplotypes from the 1000G Phase 1. ( A ) Switch accuracy between SNPTools and Beagle showed that SNPTools had higher switch accuracy. ( B ) While SNPTools had moderately worse performance on incorrect genotype percentage (IGP) for admixture populations (American [AMR] and African [AFR]), it showed comparable performance on all other populations. ( C ) Incorrect haplotype percentage (HIP) for AFR samples (representative of all populations). Phasing by SNPTools and Beagle were comparable until 100 kb [log 10 (100kb) = 2]. At longer distances, SNPTools was moderately more accurate than Beagle. ( D ) Phasing by SNPTools on AFR, Asian (ASN), AMR, and European (EUR) populations shows that AFR samples were more likely to be incorrectly phased at a given distance (data not shown). However, at 100 kb, all populations have an HIP of 65%–70%.

Journal: Genome Research

Article Title: An integrative variant analysis pipeline for accurate genotype/haplotype inference in population NGS data

doi: 10.1101/gr.146084.112

Figure Lengend Snippet: Haplotype phasing accuracy evaluation. SNPTools and Beagle are compared against the benchmark haplotypes from the 1000G Phase 1. ( A ) Switch accuracy between SNPTools and Beagle showed that SNPTools had higher switch accuracy. ( B ) While SNPTools had moderately worse performance on incorrect genotype percentage (IGP) for admixture populations (American [AMR] and African [AFR]), it showed comparable performance on all other populations. ( C ) Incorrect haplotype percentage (HIP) for AFR samples (representative of all populations). Phasing by SNPTools and Beagle were comparable until 100 kb [log 10 (100kb) = 2]. At longer distances, SNPTools was moderately more accurate than Beagle. ( D ) Phasing by SNPTools on AFR, Asian (ASN), AMR, and European (EUR) populations shows that AFR samples were more likely to be incorrectly phased at a given distance (data not shown). However, at 100 kb, all populations have an HIP of 65%–70%.

Article Snippet: SNPTools can be found at http://sourceforge.net/projects/snptools/ .

Techniques: