rsl3 (TargetMol)
Structured Review

Rsl3, supplied by TargetMol, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 82 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/rsl3/pmc13090715-83-7-12?v=TargetMol
Average 95 stars, based on 82 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Targeting HIF-1α promotes ferroptosis and boosts antitumor immunity in MSS colorectal cancer"
Article Title: Targeting HIF-1α promotes ferroptosis and boosts antitumor immunity in MSS colorectal cancer
Journal: Redox Biology
doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2026.104151
Figure Legend Snippet: A hypoxia-characteristic cluster identified by Microwell-seq exhibited pronounced ferroptosis resistance in MSS CRC cells. (A and B) t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (t-SNE) plot of Microwell-seq analysis based on gene expressions of SW480 and WiDr. (C and D) Comparative gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) of signaling pathways in different clusters. The red color represents up-regulation and blue represents down-regulation, calculated with the formula: ± Log2|NES/p.adjust|. Grey color represents no enrichment in the indicated pathway. NES: normalized enrichment score. (E and F) GSEA analysis showed the indicated pathway activity between the hypoxia cluster and other clusters. (G and H) Correlation analysis of hypoxia scores, glycolysis scores, and ferroptosis suppressor scores in WiDr and SW480 cells was performed using Pearson's method. (I and J) The ferroptosis suppressor score of SW480 and WiDr with DMSO or RSL3 treatment was analyzed by AddModuleScore tool. P values were calculated by Wilcox.test. (K and L) The ferroptosis suppressor score of hypoxia cluster in SW480 and WiDr treated with DMSO or RSL3 was shown. P values were calculated by Wilcox.test.
Techniques Used: Protein-Protein interactions, Activity Assay
Figure Legend Snippet: HIF-1α nuclear distribution increased in RSL3-resistant CT26 cells and significantly promoted tumourigenicity and metastasis. (A) The diagram demonstrated the procedure for sphere formation. (B and C) The representative images of sphere formation in MSS CRC cells and quantification analysis of sphere number derived from SW480, HT-29, and WiDr. (D) HIF-1α expression in WiDr was detected by western blotting. (E) qPCR analyzed the indicated gene expression involved in glycolysis in WiDr spheres. (F) Cell viability of parental CT26 and RSL3-resistant CT26 (Re-CT26). (G) Cytoplasm and nuclear HIF-1α expression in CT26. α-tubulin was used as an internal reference for the cytoplasm, and Histone 3 was used as a nuclear reference. (H) qPCR analyzed the indicated gene expression involved in glycolysis in CT26. (I) Image of subcutaneous tumors derived from parental CT26 and Re-CT26. (J) Tumor volume determined by formula: 0.52 × Long × width 2 . (K)Tumor weight of subcutaneous tumors. (L) Bioluminescent images in liver metastatic models. (M) Images of liver metastasis derived from parental CT26 and Re-CT26. (N) Number of liver nodules in liver metastasis models. (O) Representative hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and immunohistochemical staining images from liver metastasis models. Scale bar: 25 μm. (P) Quantification of immunohistochemical staining results shown in (O). Data are shown as means ± SD. ∗ P < 0.05; ∗∗ P < 0.01; ∗∗∗ P < 0.001; ns: not significant. Two-way ANOVA in (J), others unpaired two-tailed Student's t -test.
Techniques Used: Derivative Assay, Expressing, Western Blot, Gene Expression, Immunohistochemical staining, Staining, Two Tailed Test
Figure Legend Snippet: P4HA1 was a major factor regulated by HIF-1α and was enriched in ferroptosis-resistant cells. (A) Venn diagram screening 10 genes commonly induced by hypoxia and the glycolysis pathway in SW480 and WiDr by single-cell sequencing. (B) Gene expression heatmap showed the distribution of genes in different clusters in the presence or absence of RSL3. D: DMSO, R: RSL3. (C) Correlation between ferroptosis suppressor score and P4HA1 in MSS CRC containing 119 patients using Pearson's method. (D) Kaplan-Meier plots of RFS in MSS colon cancer patients according to P4HA1 expression. (E) The correlation between HIF-1α and P4HA1 was evaluated by Spearman's analysis in a colon adenocarcinoma cohort of 457 patients. (F) Relative P4HA1 mRNA expression after HIF-1α knockdown, detected by qPCR. (G) Relative P4HA1 protein expression after HIF-1α knockdown, detected by Western blot. (H) Relative P4HA1 mRNA expression after HIF-1α overexpression, detected by qPCR. (I) Relative P4HA1 protein expression after HIF-1α overexpression, detected by Western blot. (J) Relative P4HA1 expression, detected by qPCR. (K) HIF-1α binding motif predicted from JASPAR. (L) The prospective binding site of HIF-1α on the promoter of P4HA1. (M) ChIP assay of HIF-1α and IgG in parental CT26 cells or Re-CT26 cells, followed by qPCR for the binding sequences.
Techniques Used: Single Cell, Sequencing, Gene Expression, Expressing, Knockdown, Western Blot, Over Expression, Binding Assay
Figure Legend Snippet: HIF-1α inhibition enhanced ferroptosis inducer sensitivity in MSS CRC cells. (A and B) Cell viability of HT-29 or SW480 treated with RSL3, BAY 87-2243 alone or in combination treatment. (C and D) DCFH-DA oxidation in HT-29 or SW480 treated with RSL3, BAY 87-2243 alone or in combination treatment were quantified using flow cytometry with DCFH-DA probe. (E and F) Lipid peroxidation levels of HT-29 or SW480 treated with RSL3, BAY 87-2243 alone or in combination treatment were detected using flow cytometry with C11-BODIPY 581/591 (FITC channel; excitation/emission: 488/510 nm). (G) MDA levels in cells subjected to the indicated treatment. (H) GSH levels in cells subjected to the indicated treatment. Results are shown as means ± SD. ∗ P < 0.05 ; ∗∗ P < 0.01 ; ∗∗∗ P < 0.001 ; ∗∗∗∗ P < 0.0001 . P values were calculated by one-way ANOVA.
Techniques Used: Inhibition, Flow Cytometry
Figure Legend Snippet: HIF-1α inhibition attenuated tumor growth and liver metastasis in vivo . (A) Schematic diagram of the mouse model subcutaneously implanted with CT26 cells into balb/c mice. Mice were randomized to receive vehicle, RSL3 (80 mg/kg, intraperitoneal injection, three times per week), BAY 87-2243 (3 mg/kg, oral gavage, daily), or combination treatment when tumor size reached 50-80 mm 3 . Control mice were treated with the vehicle. (B) Photograph of tumors at experimental endpoint. (C) The tumor growth curve was shown. Tumor size was monitored by micrometer caliper measurement. P values were calculated by two-way ANOVA between the indicated groups. ∗ P < 0.05. (D and E) Tumor weight and body weight were measured at the experimental endpoint, respectively. P values were calculated by unpaired Student's t -test. ∗ P < 0.05; ns: not significant. (F) Representative images of H&E staining (left) and immunohistochemical staining (right). Scale bar: 50 μm. (G) Quantification of positive Ki67 cells in each group. P value was calculated by unpaired Student's t -test. ∗ P < 0.05. (H) 4-HNE expression in tumor tissues by western blotting. P values were calculated by unpaired Student's t -test. ∗∗ P < 0.01; ns: not significant. (I) Schematic diagram of liver metastatic model by intrasplenic injection with CT26. (J-L) Bioluminescent images (J), liver weight (K), and body weight (L) in the liver metastatic model at endpoint. P values were calculated by unpaired Student's t -test. ∗∗ P < 0.01; ns: not significant. (M) Representative images of immunostaining in the liver metastatic model at the endpoint. Scale bar: 50 μm. P values were calculated by unpaired Student's t -test. ∗∗ P < 0.01; ∗∗∗ P < 0.001.
Techniques Used: Inhibition, In Vivo, Injection, Control, Staining, Immunohistochemical staining, Expressing, Western Blot, Immunostaining
Figure Legend Snippet: Single-cell sequencing illustrated that targeting HIF-1α improved RSL3 therapeutic efficiency through reversing the tumor immune suppression microenvironment. (A) Gene expression heatmap of different populations detected in the liver metastatic section from all treatment groups. (B) t-SNE visualization of all populations (up) and each treatment group (down). DCs: dendritic cells; Reg-MAC: regulated macrophage; M2-MAC: M2-like macrophage; myCAFs: myofibroblastic cancer-associated fibroblasts. (C) Frequency of each cluster across all groups. (D) The proportion of the indicated cluster in all treatment groups. (E) The distribution of selected genes was analyzed in the M2-MAC cluster by Student's t -test. ∗∗∗∗ P < 0.0001; ns: not significant. (F) Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) analysis of M2-MAC. (G) Representative images of immunohistochemical staining in tumor tissue from the subcutaneous mouse model. P values were calculated by unpaired Student's t -test. ∗ P < 0.05; ∗∗ P < 0.01. (H) Representative images of immunohistochemical staining in tumor tissue from the liver metastasis mouse model. P values were calculated by unpaired Student's t -test. ∗∗ P < 0.01; ∗∗∗ P < 0.001.
Techniques Used: Single Cell, Sequencing, Gene Expression, Immunohistochemical staining, Staining

