dnajb2 polyclonal antibody (Proteintech)
Structured Review

Dnajb2 Polyclonal Antibody, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 10 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/dnajb2/pmc12113656-208-10-13?v=Proteintech
Average 93 stars, based on 10 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Impaired DNAJB2 Response to Heat Shock in Fibroblasts from a Neuropathy Patient with DNAJB2/HSJ1 Mutation: Cystamine as a Potential Therapeutic Intervention"
Article Title: Impaired DNAJB2 Response to Heat Shock in Fibroblasts from a Neuropathy Patient with DNAJB2/HSJ1 Mutation: Cystamine as a Potential Therapeutic Intervention
Journal: Neurology International
doi: 10.3390/neurolint17050073
Figure Legend Snippet: Schematic representation of the human DNAJB2 gene exons, resultant DNAJB2 protein isoforms and the mutation affecting the protein region. ( a ). The figure depicts the DNAJB2 gene, highlighting two transcript variants ( NM_006736.6 and NM_001039550.2 ) corresponding to protein isoforms b and a, respectively. The figure also highlights the potential regions in the transcript and the resulting protein that may be impacted by the mutation. ( b ). The table presents key attributes of the transcripts, including the number of exons, transcript lengths, and the resulting protein isoforms. A missense mutation (c.829C>T, p. Arg277Trp) is identified in Isoform b. In contrast, Isoform a contains an intronic variant (c.823+6C>T). The respective protein products exhibit molecular weights of 35.6 kDa for Isoform b and 30.6 kDa for Isoform a, with distinct cellular localizations. Isoform b is anchored to the cytoplasmic face of the endoplasmic reticulum, while Isoform a localizes in both the nucleus and cytoplasm. The predominant expression of Isoform b is indicated, which may be relevant to the pathogenic mechanism in this case.
Techniques Used: Mutagenesis, Variant Assay, Expressing
Figure Legend Snippet: Overview of the heat shock response pathway and the potential effects of the c.823+6C>T mutation on the capacity of DNAJB2 to manage cellular stress mechanisms. 1. Stressors such as heat, oxidative stress, etc., can trigger the heat shock response pathway. 2. The cell senses stress and initiates the heat shock response. 3. Release of Heat Shock Factors (HSFs) from their inactive state in the cytoplasm 4. Activated HSFs translocate to the nucleus. 5. HSFs bind to Heat Shock Elements (HSE), initiating the transcription of heat shock proteins (HSPs). 6. HSPs, including DNAJB2 (HSP40), are synthesized to refold or degrade damaged proteins. 7. DNAJB2 works with HSP70 to maintain protein homeostasis by refolding proteins or directing damaged ones for degradation.
Techniques Used: Mutagenesis, Synthesized
Figure Legend Snippet: Quantitative PCR analysis of HSJ1a and HSJ1b gene expression at various time points following a one-hour heat shock. ( a ). Schematic representation of the experimental setup showing the timing of heat shock and subsequent sampling for gene expression analysis. Gene expression levels in all the groups were normalized to their respective expression of housekeeping gene GAPDH. ( b ). Bar graph depicting the basal expression of the HSJ1a gene in control fibroblasts (JWAC-25 and JWAC-83) relative to its expression in DNAJB2-mutated patient fibroblasts (JWAC-39). ( c ). Bar graph illustrating the expression of the HSJ1a gene in control (JWAC-25 and JWAC-83) and mut. DNAJB2 fibroblasts at 3 h and 24 h post one-hour heat shock, normalized to their respective baseline expression in non-heat-shocked fibroblasts. ( d ). Bar graph displaying the expression of the HSJ1a gene expression in control (JWAC-25 and JWAC-83) and mut. DNAJB2 fibroblasts at 3 h and 24 h post one-hour heat shock, with baseline and treatment conditions for all lines normalized to the baseline expression of the mutant fibroblasts. For ( e – g ), cells were treated as in b–d but were now evaluated for HSJ1b gene expression. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was assessed using the Friedman test with uncorrected Dunn’s test to compare the baseline levels, whereas repeated measures two-way ANOVA with uncorrected Fisher’s LSD was applied for comparing the gene expression of HSJ1a and HSJ1b at various time points following a one-hour heat shock (n = 5). Results were considered statistically significant at p * < 0.05, ** < 0.01, C-1 = Control 1, C-2 = Control 2, mut. = mutant. Note: ( b , e ) are evaluating the basal levels without normalization; ( c , f ) are looking at the response of the individual line over time, and ( d , g ) are comparing the response at that given time.
Techniques Used: Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction, Gene Expression, Sampling, Expressing, Control, Mutagenesis
Figure Legend Snippet: Western blot analysis of DNAJB2 protein levels at various time points following a one-hour heat shock. ( a ). Experimental layout illustrating the timing of heat shock and subsequent sampling for protein expression analysis of HSJ1b. The expression of all the proteins were normalized to their respective total protein. ( b ). Representative immunoblot image displaying the expression of HSJ1a (36 kDa) and HSJ1b (40 kDa) bands in control (JWAC-25 and JWAC-83) and mut. DNAJB2 (JWAC-39) fibroblasts at 0, 3, 8, and 24 h post one-hour heat shock. The lower panel shows their respective total protein stains confirming equal loading of proteins (20 µg/lane). ( c ). Densitometric analysis of the basal expression of HSJ1b protein in the control fibroblasts (JWAC-25 and JWAC−83) relative to those expressed in mut. DNAJB2 patient fibroblasts (JWAC-39). ( d ). Densitometric analysis of HSJ1b protein expression in control (JWAC−25 and JWAC-83) and mut. DNAJB2 fibroblasts at 0, 3, 8, and 24 h post one−hour heat shock, normalized to their respective baseline expression in non-heat-shocked fibroblasts. ( e ). Densitometric analysis of HSJ1b protein expression in control (JWAC-25 and JWAC-83) and mut. DNAJB2 fibroblasts at 0, 3, 8, and 24 h post one-hour heat shock, normalized to the basal expression in mut. DNAJB2 patient fibroblasts. ( f ). Densitometric analysis of HSJ1a protein expression in control (JWAC-25 and JWAC-83) and mut. DNAJB2 fibroblasts at 0, 3, 8, and 24 h post one-hour heat shock, normalized to their respective baseline expression in non-heat-shocked fibroblasts. ( g ). Densitometric analysis of HSJ1a protein expression in control (JWAC-25 and JWAC-83) and mut. DNAJB2 fibroblasts at 0, 3, 8, and 24 h post one-hour heat shock, normalized to the basal expression in mut. DNAJB2 patient fibroblasts. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM. For statistics, Friedman test with uncorrected Dunn’s test was used to compare the baseline levels whereas a mixed-effects model with uncorrected Fisher’s LSD was used to compare the expression of DNAJB2 at various time points following a one-hour heat shock. Results were considered statistically significant at p * < 0.05, ** < 0.01, *** < 0.001, **** < 0.0001. (The sample size for DNAJB2 expression is n = 6, except at the 8 h time point (n = 3). C-1 = Control 1, C-2 = Control 2, mut. = mutant. Note: ( c ) is evaluating the basal levels without normalization; ( d , f ) is looking at the response of the individual line over time; and ( e , g ) are comparing the response at that given time.
Techniques Used: Western Blot, Sampling, Expressing, Control, Mutagenesis
Figure Legend Snippet: Cell viability assay of control and mut. DNAJB2 fibroblasts post one-hour of heat shock. Fibroblasts were grown in two plates and one of them was subjected to one-hour of heat shock (heat shock plate). CellTox Green Dye was added one day before the heat shock treatment. Fluorescence was measured at 0, 1, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 h post heat shock treatment. Percentage of cell death in each line were calculated relative to those caused by 1% Triton X-100 (positive control) set to 100%. Cell death in the control fibroblasts JWAC-25 (Purple), JWAC-83 (Brown) and JWAC-39 (green) in the no heat shock plate and JWAC-25 (black), JWAC-83 (Pink) and JWAC-39 (orange) in the heat shock plate were plotted at different time points post heat shock. Values are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 4, technical replicates). Note: There was an initial dip in the fluorescence intensity immediately following heat shock in the treated groups. This transient dip is attributed to the instability of the CellTox™ Green dye at elevated temperatures, such as 42 °C. The dye’s fluorescence stabilized after approximately 3 h. Therefore, the negative fluorescence values recorded during this period are technical artifacts and should not be interpreted as indicators of cell viability.
Techniques Used: Viability Assay, Control, CellTox Assay, Fluorescence, Positive Control
Figure Legend Snippet: Effect of Cystamine pretreatment on the levels of DNAJB2 (HSP40). ( a ). Experimental layout illustrating the time of introduction of Cystamine, and a washout period maintained to study its effect on the expression of HSJ1b protein levels. The expression of HSJ1b in different groups were normalized to their respective total protein. ( b ). Representative immunoblot image showing the expression of HSJ1a (36 kDa) and HSJ1b (40 kDa) bands in the controls (JWAC-83) and mut. DNAJB2 (JWAC-39) fibroblasts, detected with anti-DNAJB2 antibody across different exposure times and washout periods of Cystamine (150 µM). The lower panel represents their respective total protein stains, confirming comparable loading of proteins (20 µg/lane). ( c ). Densitometric analysis of the expression of HSJ1b isoform protein in control (JWAC-83) and mut. DNAJB2 (JWAC-39) fibroblasts across different exposure times and washout periods of Cystamine, normalized to the basal expression of the protein in their respective untreated fibroblasts. ( d ). Densitometric analysis of the expression of HSJ1a isoform proteins in control (JWAC-83) and mut. DNAJB2 (JWAC-39) fibroblasts across different exposure times and washout periods of Cystamine, normalized to the basal expression of the protein in their respective untreated fibroblasts. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM. For statistics, repeated measures two-way ANOVA with uncorrected Fisher’s LSD were used. Results were considered statistically significant at p * < 0.05 (n = 3 for DNAJB2 expression). (Stab. = Stabilization).
Techniques Used: Expressing, Western Blot, Control

