Review



anti dek antibody  (Proteintech)


Bioz Verified Symbol Proteintech is a verified supplier  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 92

    Structured Review

    Proteintech anti dek antibody
    Roles of <t>DEK</t> in gastric cancer stemness and peritoneal metastasis. (A) Correlation analysis between DEK expression and cancer stem cell (CSC) signature in the TCGA gastric cancer cohort. (B) Detailed correlations between DEK and the 16 individual members of the CSC signature. (C) Correlations between DEK and two key CSC markers, SOX9 (right) <t>and</t> <t>YAP1</t> (left), in the TCGA cohort. (D) Assessment of DEK levels in AGS cells transfected with DEK-encoding lentivirus (DEK-OE) or vector, along with their expression levels of YAP1 and SOX9 . (E) mRNA levels of DEK , YAP1 , and SOX9 measured in DEK-OE and control cells by RT-PCR, standardized to the corresponding expression levels in control cells. (F) Tumor sphere formation abilities in DEK-OE and control cells. Photographs of tumor sphere formation at 3-day intervals are shown on the left and quantitative analysis are on the right. (G) Schematic representation of the peritoneal metastasis model using DEK-OE or control tumor cells in mice. (H) Measurements of abdominal circumference (left) and body weight (right) changes in mice with DEK-OE versus control cells. (I-K) Visual (left) and quantitative assessment (right) of peritoneal metastasis models, showing general appearance (I), volume of ascites (J), and peritoneal implants (K) on day 20 for DEK-OE vs. control subcutaneous gastric cancer groups. (L) Kaplan-Meier survival curves for mouse models with DEK-OE versus control cells. (M−N) Protein (M) and mRNA (N) levels of DEK, YAP1, and SOX9 in peritoneal tumors from the mouse models. (O) Schematic representation of competition assays in the peritoneal model with DEK-OE and control cells. (P) Proportions of DEK-OE and control cells in the peritoneum of mice in the competition model, measured by flow cytometry.
    Anti Dek Antibody, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 19 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/dek/DEK+Antibody/pmc12957787-72-15-17
    Average 92 stars, based on 19 article reviews
    anti dek antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    92/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Genomic landscape of paired primary and peritoneal metastatic lesions in gastric cancer highlights evolutionary dynamics and mutational drivers"

    Article Title: Genomic landscape of paired primary and peritoneal metastatic lesions in gastric cancer highlights evolutionary dynamics and mutational drivers

    Journal: Journal of Advanced Research

    doi: 10.1016/j.jare.2025.05.043

    Roles of DEK in gastric cancer stemness and peritoneal metastasis. (A) Correlation analysis between DEK expression and cancer stem cell (CSC) signature in the TCGA gastric cancer cohort. (B) Detailed correlations between DEK and the 16 individual members of the CSC signature. (C) Correlations between DEK and two key CSC markers, SOX9 (right) and YAP1 (left), in the TCGA cohort. (D) Assessment of DEK levels in AGS cells transfected with DEK-encoding lentivirus (DEK-OE) or vector, along with their expression levels of YAP1 and SOX9 . (E) mRNA levels of DEK , YAP1 , and SOX9 measured in DEK-OE and control cells by RT-PCR, standardized to the corresponding expression levels in control cells. (F) Tumor sphere formation abilities in DEK-OE and control cells. Photographs of tumor sphere formation at 3-day intervals are shown on the left and quantitative analysis are on the right. (G) Schematic representation of the peritoneal metastasis model using DEK-OE or control tumor cells in mice. (H) Measurements of abdominal circumference (left) and body weight (right) changes in mice with DEK-OE versus control cells. (I-K) Visual (left) and quantitative assessment (right) of peritoneal metastasis models, showing general appearance (I), volume of ascites (J), and peritoneal implants (K) on day 20 for DEK-OE vs. control subcutaneous gastric cancer groups. (L) Kaplan-Meier survival curves for mouse models with DEK-OE versus control cells. (M−N) Protein (M) and mRNA (N) levels of DEK, YAP1, and SOX9 in peritoneal tumors from the mouse models. (O) Schematic representation of competition assays in the peritoneal model with DEK-OE and control cells. (P) Proportions of DEK-OE and control cells in the peritoneum of mice in the competition model, measured by flow cytometry.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Roles of DEK in gastric cancer stemness and peritoneal metastasis. (A) Correlation analysis between DEK expression and cancer stem cell (CSC) signature in the TCGA gastric cancer cohort. (B) Detailed correlations between DEK and the 16 individual members of the CSC signature. (C) Correlations between DEK and two key CSC markers, SOX9 (right) and YAP1 (left), in the TCGA cohort. (D) Assessment of DEK levels in AGS cells transfected with DEK-encoding lentivirus (DEK-OE) or vector, along with their expression levels of YAP1 and SOX9 . (E) mRNA levels of DEK , YAP1 , and SOX9 measured in DEK-OE and control cells by RT-PCR, standardized to the corresponding expression levels in control cells. (F) Tumor sphere formation abilities in DEK-OE and control cells. Photographs of tumor sphere formation at 3-day intervals are shown on the left and quantitative analysis are on the right. (G) Schematic representation of the peritoneal metastasis model using DEK-OE or control tumor cells in mice. (H) Measurements of abdominal circumference (left) and body weight (right) changes in mice with DEK-OE versus control cells. (I-K) Visual (left) and quantitative assessment (right) of peritoneal metastasis models, showing general appearance (I), volume of ascites (J), and peritoneal implants (K) on day 20 for DEK-OE vs. control subcutaneous gastric cancer groups. (L) Kaplan-Meier survival curves for mouse models with DEK-OE versus control cells. (M−N) Protein (M) and mRNA (N) levels of DEK, YAP1, and SOX9 in peritoneal tumors from the mouse models. (O) Schematic representation of competition assays in the peritoneal model with DEK-OE and control cells. (P) Proportions of DEK-OE and control cells in the peritoneum of mice in the competition model, measured by flow cytometry.

    Techniques Used: Expressing, Transfection, Plasmid Preparation, Control, Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction, Flow Cytometry



    Similar Products

    94
    Cell Signaling Technology Inc dek
    a , b Distribution of ac4C modification sites on mRNA of CXCL5 and <t>DEK.</t> c , d The ac4C modification of CXCL5 and DEK was verified through acRIP-PCR. e , f The dual fluorescence experiment confirmed the importance <t>of</t> <t>NAT10</t> recognizing the ac4C modification site of the target gene. g , h Detecting the differential mRNA and protein levels of CXCL5 and DEK before and after NAT10 knockout, as well as cancer tissues and adjacent tissues in LUAD. i Co-localized the intracellular expression of NAT10 with CXCL5 or DEK by Fish and IF. j The half-life changes of CXCL5 and DEK mRNA after inhibiting NAT10. The data in ( e , f ) were normalized to Si-NC levels. The data in ( g ) was normalized to WT levels. The data in ( h ) was normalized to tumor tissue levels. The clinical samples used in Fig. 4h is consistent with those in Fig. .
    Dek, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/dek/DEK+Rabbit+mAb/pmc13039259-189-16-18
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    dek - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    92
    Proteintech anti dek antibody
    Roles of <t>DEK</t> in gastric cancer stemness and peritoneal metastasis. (A) Correlation analysis between DEK expression and cancer stem cell (CSC) signature in the TCGA gastric cancer cohort. (B) Detailed correlations between DEK and the 16 individual members of the CSC signature. (C) Correlations between DEK and two key CSC markers, SOX9 (right) <t>and</t> <t>YAP1</t> (left), in the TCGA cohort. (D) Assessment of DEK levels in AGS cells transfected with DEK-encoding lentivirus (DEK-OE) or vector, along with their expression levels of YAP1 and SOX9 . (E) mRNA levels of DEK , YAP1 , and SOX9 measured in DEK-OE and control cells by RT-PCR, standardized to the corresponding expression levels in control cells. (F) Tumor sphere formation abilities in DEK-OE and control cells. Photographs of tumor sphere formation at 3-day intervals are shown on the left and quantitative analysis are on the right. (G) Schematic representation of the peritoneal metastasis model using DEK-OE or control tumor cells in mice. (H) Measurements of abdominal circumference (left) and body weight (right) changes in mice with DEK-OE versus control cells. (I-K) Visual (left) and quantitative assessment (right) of peritoneal metastasis models, showing general appearance (I), volume of ascites (J), and peritoneal implants (K) on day 20 for DEK-OE vs. control subcutaneous gastric cancer groups. (L) Kaplan-Meier survival curves for mouse models with DEK-OE versus control cells. (M−N) Protein (M) and mRNA (N) levels of DEK, YAP1, and SOX9 in peritoneal tumors from the mouse models. (O) Schematic representation of competition assays in the peritoneal model with DEK-OE and control cells. (P) Proportions of DEK-OE and control cells in the peritoneum of mice in the competition model, measured by flow cytometry.
    Anti Dek Antibody, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/dek/DEK+Antibody/pmc12957787-72-15-17
    Average 92 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti dek antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    92/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    Fisher Scientific 3 pentanone dek
    Roles of <t>DEK</t> in gastric cancer stemness and peritoneal metastasis. (A) Correlation analysis between DEK expression and cancer stem cell (CSC) signature in the TCGA gastric cancer cohort. (B) Detailed correlations between DEK and the 16 individual members of the CSC signature. (C) Correlations between DEK and two key CSC markers, SOX9 (right) <t>and</t> <t>YAP1</t> (left), in the TCGA cohort. (D) Assessment of DEK levels in AGS cells transfected with DEK-encoding lentivirus (DEK-OE) or vector, along with their expression levels of YAP1 and SOX9 . (E) mRNA levels of DEK , YAP1 , and SOX9 measured in DEK-OE and control cells by RT-PCR, standardized to the corresponding expression levels in control cells. (F) Tumor sphere formation abilities in DEK-OE and control cells. Photographs of tumor sphere formation at 3-day intervals are shown on the left and quantitative analysis are on the right. (G) Schematic representation of the peritoneal metastasis model using DEK-OE or control tumor cells in mice. (H) Measurements of abdominal circumference (left) and body weight (right) changes in mice with DEK-OE versus control cells. (I-K) Visual (left) and quantitative assessment (right) of peritoneal metastasis models, showing general appearance (I), volume of ascites (J), and peritoneal implants (K) on day 20 for DEK-OE vs. control subcutaneous gastric cancer groups. (L) Kaplan-Meier survival curves for mouse models with DEK-OE versus control cells. (M−N) Protein (M) and mRNA (N) levels of DEK, YAP1, and SOX9 in peritoneal tumors from the mouse models. (O) Schematic representation of competition assays in the peritoneal model with DEK-OE and control cells. (P) Proportions of DEK-OE and control cells in the peritoneum of mice in the competition model, measured by flow cytometry.
    3 Pentanone Dek, supplied by Fisher Scientific, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/dek/3+dek+pentanone/pm40915001-78-0-11
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    3 pentanone dek - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    Merck & Co dek
    Roles of <t>DEK</t> in gastric cancer stemness and peritoneal metastasis. (A) Correlation analysis between DEK expression and cancer stem cell (CSC) signature in the TCGA gastric cancer cohort. (B) Detailed correlations between DEK and the 16 individual members of the CSC signature. (C) Correlations between DEK and two key CSC markers, SOX9 (right) <t>and</t> <t>YAP1</t> (left), in the TCGA cohort. (D) Assessment of DEK levels in AGS cells transfected with DEK-encoding lentivirus (DEK-OE) or vector, along with their expression levels of YAP1 and SOX9 . (E) mRNA levels of DEK , YAP1 , and SOX9 measured in DEK-OE and control cells by RT-PCR, standardized to the corresponding expression levels in control cells. (F) Tumor sphere formation abilities in DEK-OE and control cells. Photographs of tumor sphere formation at 3-day intervals are shown on the left and quantitative analysis are on the right. (G) Schematic representation of the peritoneal metastasis model using DEK-OE or control tumor cells in mice. (H) Measurements of abdominal circumference (left) and body weight (right) changes in mice with DEK-OE versus control cells. (I-K) Visual (left) and quantitative assessment (right) of peritoneal metastasis models, showing general appearance (I), volume of ascites (J), and peritoneal implants (K) on day 20 for DEK-OE vs. control subcutaneous gastric cancer groups. (L) Kaplan-Meier survival curves for mouse models with DEK-OE versus control cells. (M−N) Protein (M) and mRNA (N) levels of DEK, YAP1, and SOX9 in peritoneal tumors from the mouse models. (O) Schematic representation of competition assays in the peritoneal model with DEK-OE and control cells. (P) Proportions of DEK-OE and control cells in the peritoneum of mice in the competition model, measured by flow cytometry.
    Dek, supplied by Merck & Co, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/dek/dek/10__1002_slash_adsu__202500525-167-17-21
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    dek - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    92
    Proteintech sc dek 2 proteintech dek 3
    Roles of <t>DEK</t> in gastric cancer stemness and peritoneal metastasis. (A) Correlation analysis between DEK expression and cancer stem cell (CSC) signature in the TCGA gastric cancer cohort. (B) Detailed correlations between DEK and the 16 individual members of the CSC signature. (C) Correlations between DEK and two key CSC markers, SOX9 (right) <t>and</t> <t>YAP1</t> (left), in the TCGA cohort. (D) Assessment of DEK levels in AGS cells transfected with DEK-encoding lentivirus (DEK-OE) or vector, along with their expression levels of YAP1 and SOX9 . (E) mRNA levels of DEK , YAP1 , and SOX9 measured in DEK-OE and control cells by RT-PCR, standardized to the corresponding expression levels in control cells. (F) Tumor sphere formation abilities in DEK-OE and control cells. Photographs of tumor sphere formation at 3-day intervals are shown on the left and quantitative analysis are on the right. (G) Schematic representation of the peritoneal metastasis model using DEK-OE or control tumor cells in mice. (H) Measurements of abdominal circumference (left) and body weight (right) changes in mice with DEK-OE versus control cells. (I-K) Visual (left) and quantitative assessment (right) of peritoneal metastasis models, showing general appearance (I), volume of ascites (J), and peritoneal implants (K) on day 20 for DEK-OE vs. control subcutaneous gastric cancer groups. (L) Kaplan-Meier survival curves for mouse models with DEK-OE versus control cells. (M−N) Protein (M) and mRNA (N) levels of DEK, YAP1, and SOX9 in peritoneal tumors from the mouse models. (O) Schematic representation of competition assays in the peritoneal model with DEK-OE and control cells. (P) Proportions of DEK-OE and control cells in the peritoneum of mice in the competition model, measured by flow cytometry.
    Sc Dek 2 Proteintech Dek 3, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/dek/DEK+Antibody/pmc12198979__LSA-2025-03230_SdataF1_F3_F4_F6_F7_FS4-26-142-144
    Average 92 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    sc dek 2 proteintech dek 3 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    92/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    ABclonal Biotechnology antibody dek a0315
    Roles of <t>DEK</t> in gastric cancer stemness and peritoneal metastasis. (A) Correlation analysis between DEK expression and cancer stem cell (CSC) signature in the TCGA gastric cancer cohort. (B) Detailed correlations between DEK and the 16 individual members of the CSC signature. (C) Correlations between DEK and two key CSC markers, SOX9 (right) <t>and</t> <t>YAP1</t> (left), in the TCGA cohort. (D) Assessment of DEK levels in AGS cells transfected with DEK-encoding lentivirus (DEK-OE) or vector, along with their expression levels of YAP1 and SOX9 . (E) mRNA levels of DEK , YAP1 , and SOX9 measured in DEK-OE and control cells by RT-PCR, standardized to the corresponding expression levels in control cells. (F) Tumor sphere formation abilities in DEK-OE and control cells. Photographs of tumor sphere formation at 3-day intervals are shown on the left and quantitative analysis are on the right. (G) Schematic representation of the peritoneal metastasis model using DEK-OE or control tumor cells in mice. (H) Measurements of abdominal circumference (left) and body weight (right) changes in mice with DEK-OE versus control cells. (I-K) Visual (left) and quantitative assessment (right) of peritoneal metastasis models, showing general appearance (I), volume of ascites (J), and peritoneal implants (K) on day 20 for DEK-OE vs. control subcutaneous gastric cancer groups. (L) Kaplan-Meier survival curves for mouse models with DEK-OE versus control cells. (M−N) Protein (M) and mRNA (N) levels of DEK, YAP1, and SOX9 in peritoneal tumors from the mouse models. (O) Schematic representation of competition assays in the peritoneal model with DEK-OE and control cells. (P) Proportions of DEK-OE and control cells in the peritoneum of mice in the competition model, measured by flow cytometry.
    Antibody Dek A0315, supplied by ABclonal Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/dek/antibody+dek+a0315/pm40562540-342-7-10
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    antibody dek a0315 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Makita dek-can tmkqickkeir
    Roles of <t>DEK</t> in gastric cancer stemness and peritoneal metastasis. (A) Correlation analysis between DEK expression and cancer stem cell (CSC) signature in the TCGA gastric cancer cohort. (B) Detailed correlations between DEK and the 16 individual members of the CSC signature. (C) Correlations between DEK and two key CSC markers, SOX9 (right) <t>and</t> <t>YAP1</t> (left), in the TCGA cohort. (D) Assessment of DEK levels in AGS cells transfected with DEK-encoding lentivirus (DEK-OE) or vector, along with their expression levels of YAP1 and SOX9 . (E) mRNA levels of DEK , YAP1 , and SOX9 measured in DEK-OE and control cells by RT-PCR, standardized to the corresponding expression levels in control cells. (F) Tumor sphere formation abilities in DEK-OE and control cells. Photographs of tumor sphere formation at 3-day intervals are shown on the left and quantitative analysis are on the right. (G) Schematic representation of the peritoneal metastasis model using DEK-OE or control tumor cells in mice. (H) Measurements of abdominal circumference (left) and body weight (right) changes in mice with DEK-OE versus control cells. (I-K) Visual (left) and quantitative assessment (right) of peritoneal metastasis models, showing general appearance (I), volume of ascites (J), and peritoneal implants (K) on day 20 for DEK-OE vs. control subcutaneous gastric cancer groups. (L) Kaplan-Meier survival curves for mouse models with DEK-OE versus control cells. (M−N) Protein (M) and mRNA (N) levels of DEK, YAP1, and SOX9 in peritoneal tumors from the mouse models. (O) Schematic representation of competition assays in the peritoneal model with DEK-OE and control cells. (P) Proportions of DEK-OE and control cells in the peritoneum of mice in the competition model, measured by flow cytometry.
    Dek Can Tmkqickkeir, supplied by Makita, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/dek/dek+can+tmkqickkeir/us12312382-2519-2-3
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    dek-can tmkqickkeir - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Millipore mission rnas for human dek, sidek1 (sasi_hs01_00011598)
    Roles of <t>DEK</t> in gastric cancer stemness and peritoneal metastasis. (A) Correlation analysis between DEK expression and cancer stem cell (CSC) signature in the TCGA gastric cancer cohort. (B) Detailed correlations between DEK and the 16 individual members of the CSC signature. (C) Correlations between DEK and two key CSC markers, SOX9 (right) <t>and</t> <t>YAP1</t> (left), in the TCGA cohort. (D) Assessment of DEK levels in AGS cells transfected with DEK-encoding lentivirus (DEK-OE) or vector, along with their expression levels of YAP1 and SOX9 . (E) mRNA levels of DEK , YAP1 , and SOX9 measured in DEK-OE and control cells by RT-PCR, standardized to the corresponding expression levels in control cells. (F) Tumor sphere formation abilities in DEK-OE and control cells. Photographs of tumor sphere formation at 3-day intervals are shown on the left and quantitative analysis are on the right. (G) Schematic representation of the peritoneal metastasis model using DEK-OE or control tumor cells in mice. (H) Measurements of abdominal circumference (left) and body weight (right) changes in mice with DEK-OE versus control cells. (I-K) Visual (left) and quantitative assessment (right) of peritoneal metastasis models, showing general appearance (I), volume of ascites (J), and peritoneal implants (K) on day 20 for DEK-OE vs. control subcutaneous gastric cancer groups. (L) Kaplan-Meier survival curves for mouse models with DEK-OE versus control cells. (M−N) Protein (M) and mRNA (N) levels of DEK, YAP1, and SOX9 in peritoneal tumors from the mouse models. (O) Schematic representation of competition assays in the peritoneal model with DEK-OE and control cells. (P) Proportions of DEK-OE and control cells in the peritoneum of mice in the competition model, measured by flow cytometry.
    Mission Rnas For Human Dek, Sidek1 (Sasi Hs01 00011598), supplied by Millipore, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/dek/sirna+oligonucleotides/pm40318137-263-5-13
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mission rnas for human dek, sidek1 (sasi_hs01_00011598) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    a , b Distribution of ac4C modification sites on mRNA of CXCL5 and DEK. c , d The ac4C modification of CXCL5 and DEK was verified through acRIP-PCR. e , f The dual fluorescence experiment confirmed the importance of NAT10 recognizing the ac4C modification site of the target gene. g , h Detecting the differential mRNA and protein levels of CXCL5 and DEK before and after NAT10 knockout, as well as cancer tissues and adjacent tissues in LUAD. i Co-localized the intracellular expression of NAT10 with CXCL5 or DEK by Fish and IF. j The half-life changes of CXCL5 and DEK mRNA after inhibiting NAT10. The data in ( e , f ) were normalized to Si-NC levels. The data in ( g ) was normalized to WT levels. The data in ( h ) was normalized to tumor tissue levels. The clinical samples used in Fig. 4h is consistent with those in Fig. .

    Journal: Cell Death & Disease

    Article Title: NAT10-mediated ac4C RNA acetylation stabilizes CXCL5/DEK mRNA to drive proliferation and metastasis in lung adenocarcinoma

    doi: 10.1038/s41419-026-08568-6

    Figure Lengend Snippet: a , b Distribution of ac4C modification sites on mRNA of CXCL5 and DEK. c , d The ac4C modification of CXCL5 and DEK was verified through acRIP-PCR. e , f The dual fluorescence experiment confirmed the importance of NAT10 recognizing the ac4C modification site of the target gene. g , h Detecting the differential mRNA and protein levels of CXCL5 and DEK before and after NAT10 knockout, as well as cancer tissues and adjacent tissues in LUAD. i Co-localized the intracellular expression of NAT10 with CXCL5 or DEK by Fish and IF. j The half-life changes of CXCL5 and DEK mRNA after inhibiting NAT10. The data in ( e , f ) were normalized to Si-NC levels. The data in ( g ) was normalized to WT levels. The data in ( h ) was normalized to tumor tissue levels. The clinical samples used in Fig. 4h is consistent with those in Fig. .

    Article Snippet: The antibodies used in this process consisted of NAT10 (1:1000, Abcam, ab194297), CXCL5 (1:300, Abcam, ab126763), DEK (1:500, CST, 29812 T), GAPDH (1:1000, Abcam, ab181602), HRP-conjugated secondary goat anti-rabbit IgG (1:5000, Proteintech, SA00001-2), and Goat anti-Mouse IgG (1:5000, ABclonal, AS003).

    Techniques: Modification, Fluorescence, Knock-Out, Expressing

    a Phenotypic comparison of A549 wild-type and NAT10-knockout cells. b Co-localized the intracellular expression of NAT10 with F-actin by IF. c Prove the effect of overexpression of CXCL5 and DEK separately or simultaneously at the mRNA and protein levels. d Cell proliferation was measured using the CCK8 assay after NAT10 knockout and CXCL5/DEK overexpression. e Inhibition of invasion and metastasis of LUAD cells by NAT10 and its rescue effect on CXCL5/DEK. f Inhibition of cell adhesion of LUAD cells by NAT10 and its rescue effect on CXCL5/DEK. The data in ( c ) was normalized to WT + Vector levels.

    Journal: Cell Death & Disease

    Article Title: NAT10-mediated ac4C RNA acetylation stabilizes CXCL5/DEK mRNA to drive proliferation and metastasis in lung adenocarcinoma

    doi: 10.1038/s41419-026-08568-6

    Figure Lengend Snippet: a Phenotypic comparison of A549 wild-type and NAT10-knockout cells. b Co-localized the intracellular expression of NAT10 with F-actin by IF. c Prove the effect of overexpression of CXCL5 and DEK separately or simultaneously at the mRNA and protein levels. d Cell proliferation was measured using the CCK8 assay after NAT10 knockout and CXCL5/DEK overexpression. e Inhibition of invasion and metastasis of LUAD cells by NAT10 and its rescue effect on CXCL5/DEK. f Inhibition of cell adhesion of LUAD cells by NAT10 and its rescue effect on CXCL5/DEK. The data in ( c ) was normalized to WT + Vector levels.

    Article Snippet: The antibodies used in this process consisted of NAT10 (1:1000, Abcam, ab194297), CXCL5 (1:300, Abcam, ab126763), DEK (1:500, CST, 29812 T), GAPDH (1:1000, Abcam, ab181602), HRP-conjugated secondary goat anti-rabbit IgG (1:5000, Proteintech, SA00001-2), and Goat anti-Mouse IgG (1:5000, ABclonal, AS003).

    Techniques: Comparison, Knock-Out, Expressing, Over Expression, CCK-8 Assay, Inhibition, Plasmid Preparation

    Initially, NAT10 acetylates CXCL5 and DEK to maintain their mRNA stability and expression. Then, the increased expression of CXCL5 and DEK promoted tumor adhesion to facilitate LUAD proliferation and metastasis. Created in https://BioRender.com .

    Journal: Cell Death & Disease

    Article Title: NAT10-mediated ac4C RNA acetylation stabilizes CXCL5/DEK mRNA to drive proliferation and metastasis in lung adenocarcinoma

    doi: 10.1038/s41419-026-08568-6

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Initially, NAT10 acetylates CXCL5 and DEK to maintain their mRNA stability and expression. Then, the increased expression of CXCL5 and DEK promoted tumor adhesion to facilitate LUAD proliferation and metastasis. Created in https://BioRender.com .

    Article Snippet: The antibodies used in this process consisted of NAT10 (1:1000, Abcam, ab194297), CXCL5 (1:300, Abcam, ab126763), DEK (1:500, CST, 29812 T), GAPDH (1:1000, Abcam, ab181602), HRP-conjugated secondary goat anti-rabbit IgG (1:5000, Proteintech, SA00001-2), and Goat anti-Mouse IgG (1:5000, ABclonal, AS003).

    Techniques: Expressing

    Roles of DEK in gastric cancer stemness and peritoneal metastasis. (A) Correlation analysis between DEK expression and cancer stem cell (CSC) signature in the TCGA gastric cancer cohort. (B) Detailed correlations between DEK and the 16 individual members of the CSC signature. (C) Correlations between DEK and two key CSC markers, SOX9 (right) and YAP1 (left), in the TCGA cohort. (D) Assessment of DEK levels in AGS cells transfected with DEK-encoding lentivirus (DEK-OE) or vector, along with their expression levels of YAP1 and SOX9 . (E) mRNA levels of DEK , YAP1 , and SOX9 measured in DEK-OE and control cells by RT-PCR, standardized to the corresponding expression levels in control cells. (F) Tumor sphere formation abilities in DEK-OE and control cells. Photographs of tumor sphere formation at 3-day intervals are shown on the left and quantitative analysis are on the right. (G) Schematic representation of the peritoneal metastasis model using DEK-OE or control tumor cells in mice. (H) Measurements of abdominal circumference (left) and body weight (right) changes in mice with DEK-OE versus control cells. (I-K) Visual (left) and quantitative assessment (right) of peritoneal metastasis models, showing general appearance (I), volume of ascites (J), and peritoneal implants (K) on day 20 for DEK-OE vs. control subcutaneous gastric cancer groups. (L) Kaplan-Meier survival curves for mouse models with DEK-OE versus control cells. (M−N) Protein (M) and mRNA (N) levels of DEK, YAP1, and SOX9 in peritoneal tumors from the mouse models. (O) Schematic representation of competition assays in the peritoneal model with DEK-OE and control cells. (P) Proportions of DEK-OE and control cells in the peritoneum of mice in the competition model, measured by flow cytometry.

    Journal: Journal of Advanced Research

    Article Title: Genomic landscape of paired primary and peritoneal metastatic lesions in gastric cancer highlights evolutionary dynamics and mutational drivers

    doi: 10.1016/j.jare.2025.05.043

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Roles of DEK in gastric cancer stemness and peritoneal metastasis. (A) Correlation analysis between DEK expression and cancer stem cell (CSC) signature in the TCGA gastric cancer cohort. (B) Detailed correlations between DEK and the 16 individual members of the CSC signature. (C) Correlations between DEK and two key CSC markers, SOX9 (right) and YAP1 (left), in the TCGA cohort. (D) Assessment of DEK levels in AGS cells transfected with DEK-encoding lentivirus (DEK-OE) or vector, along with their expression levels of YAP1 and SOX9 . (E) mRNA levels of DEK , YAP1 , and SOX9 measured in DEK-OE and control cells by RT-PCR, standardized to the corresponding expression levels in control cells. (F) Tumor sphere formation abilities in DEK-OE and control cells. Photographs of tumor sphere formation at 3-day intervals are shown on the left and quantitative analysis are on the right. (G) Schematic representation of the peritoneal metastasis model using DEK-OE or control tumor cells in mice. (H) Measurements of abdominal circumference (left) and body weight (right) changes in mice with DEK-OE versus control cells. (I-K) Visual (left) and quantitative assessment (right) of peritoneal metastasis models, showing general appearance (I), volume of ascites (J), and peritoneal implants (K) on day 20 for DEK-OE vs. control subcutaneous gastric cancer groups. (L) Kaplan-Meier survival curves for mouse models with DEK-OE versus control cells. (M−N) Protein (M) and mRNA (N) levels of DEK, YAP1, and SOX9 in peritoneal tumors from the mouse models. (O) Schematic representation of competition assays in the peritoneal model with DEK-OE and control cells. (P) Proportions of DEK-OE and control cells in the peritoneum of mice in the competition model, measured by flow cytometry.

    Article Snippet: Paraffin-embedded sections were treated with goat serum to block non-specific binding and subsequently stained with anti-DEK antibody (Proteintech, Wuhan, China) and anti-YAP1 antibody (Proteintech, Wuhan, China) using an IHC staining kit (Zsbio, Beijing, China).

    Techniques: Expressing, Transfection, Plasmid Preparation, Control, Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction, Flow Cytometry