cxcl5 (Bioss)
Structured Review

Cxcl5, supplied by Bioss, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 25 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/cxcl5/product/Bioss
Average 93 stars, based on 25 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Residual tumor cells after insufficient radiofrequency ablation promote lung metastasis by educating CD177 hi PAD4 hi neutrophils"
Article Title: Residual tumor cells after insufficient radiofrequency ablation promote lung metastasis by educating CD177 hi PAD4 hi neutrophils
Journal: Nature Communications
doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-66897-0
Figure Legend Snippet: A Differences in RNA-seq between Ctrl and iRFA on day 3 post-iRFA ( n = 3 mice). Volcano plot of DEGs identified by DESeq2, based on a negative binomial model. B Cxcl5 ( P < 0.001) and Il1b ( P = 0.045) in CT26 cells ± OA treated at 37 °C/45 °C via ELISA ( n = 3 biological replicates). ANOVA. C Cxcl5 in CT26 cells treated with DMSO, SB190, or SB580 at 37 °C/45 °C ± OA ( n = 3 biological replicates). P < 0.001, ANOVA. #, P < 0.001 vs . 45 °C + OA + DMSO group. D MPO-dsDNA levels in neutrophils co-cultured with conditioned media from CT26 cells (37 °C/45 °C) ± OA, with Cxcl5 and / or CXCR1/2 inhibitor (Reparixin) treatment ( n = 3 biological replicates). P < 0.001, ANOVA. # vs . 37 °C; ▼ vs . 37 °C + OA; ★ vs . 45 °C; P < 0.001. E (Left) Immunofluorescence in neutrophils co-cultured with 37 °C and 45 °C + OA CT26 / DLD1 TCM supplemented with DMSO / Trametinib (MEK/ERK inhibitor). (Right) cit-H3 + area quantification ( n = 3 biological replicates). P < 0.001, ANOVA. F , Erk and pErk in the neutrophils from iRFA mice. G–I Proteins in neutrophils treated with 37 °C or 45 °C ± OA CT26 TCM supplemented with ± ( G ) Cxcl5, ( H ) SB190, and ( I ) Reparixin. J Lung tissues from the Ctrl and iRFA mice treated with DMSO, Trametinib and/or a P38 inhibitor (Ralimetinib). K HE staining of lung tissues (Circles: lung metastases). L The quantification of lung metastatic area ( n = 9 mice). Ctrl groups: P = 0.059; iRFA groups: P < 0.001; ANOVA. M (Left) Ly6G and cit-H3 immunofluorescence in liver tumors. (Right) Quantification of the cit-H3 + area ( n = 9 mice). P < 0.001, ANOVA. Scale bars, 200 μm. N Ly6G and pErk immunofluorescence in liver tumors. Scale bars, 50 μm. Data are presented as mean values ± SD. C , H SB190: SB202190. C SB580: SB203580. E 37/45: 37 °C/45 °C. E and G – I TCM: conditioned media from tumor cells. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Techniques Used: RNA Sequencing, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Cell Culture, Immunofluorescence, Staining
Figure Legend Snippet: A Treatment timeline for a representative CRLM patient. The patient underwent Dixon surgery following CRLM diagnosis. First tumor evaluation showed a new metastasis in liver S5, and subsequently, RFA was performed. Postoperative PET/CT showed no tumor viability. Intrahepatic S7 metastasis appeared 4 months later. S5 and S7 tissues were obtained through hepatic resection, and pathological examination as well as sequencing were performed. The second progression with new lung metastases occurred at 7 months. Triangles: liver or lung metastases. B Neutrophil infiltration levels in tumors pre- and post-iRFA analyzed by different datasets (Box center line: median; box limits: upper and lower quartiles; whiskers: 1.5× interquartile range). C Representative GSEA analysis of FA metabolism and the PPAR pathway, and the differences in scRNA-seq data between pre- and post-iRFA tumors. Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. FDR correction. D CD36 and CXCL5 staining of the tumors pre- and post-iRFA. E Density quantification of CD36 + and CXCL5 + areas in the tumors pre- and post-iRFA. F CD66b immunofluorescence in tumors pre- and post-iRFA. Scale bars, 50 μm and 10 μm. CD66b + neutrophil counts shown on the left. G MPO and cit-H3 immunofluorescence in tumors pre- and post-iRFA. Scale bars, 50 μm. The cit-H3 + area shown on the left. H Mesenchymal markers, epithelial markers, and CD36 immunofluorescence on CTCs were analyzed. The data represented the proportions of CD36 hi -CTCs, CD36 hi -E-CTCs, and CD36 hi -EM-CTCs in the tumors pre- and post-iRFA. Scale bars, 10 μm. I MPO-dsDNA levels in the peripheral blood pre- and post-iRFA. J The data represented the proportions of CD36 hi -CTCs and CD36 hi -EM-CTCs in the cRFA and iRFA tumors. K MPO-dsDNA levels in the peripheral blood of cRFA and iRFA patients. Data are presented as mean values ± SD; Statistical analysis was performed based on Paired t -test ( B , E , F , and G , n = 8 patients; H and I , n = 13 patients) or Unpaired two-sided t -test ( J , K ); cRFA, n = 5 patients, iRFA, n = 13 patients). Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Techniques Used: Biomarker Discovery, Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography, Sequencing, Staining, Immunofluorescence
