Review




Structured Review

Proteintech craf
(A) Western blot confirming effective silencing of ARAF, BRAF, or <t>CRAF</t> expression in iM27 cells using corresponding siRNAs. (B) Representative fluorescence microscopy images showing β-catenin expression in iM27 cells transfected with scramble siRNA or siRNAs that deplete ARAF, BRAF, or CRAF expression under PLX4032 treatment. iM27 transfected with scramble siRNA without PLX4032 treatment were used as a control. (C) Quantification of nuclear β-catenin intensity in iM27 and genetically modified iM27 cells as shown in (B) with or without PLX4032 treatment using ImageJ. The data are presented as the means ± SDs (n = 11 randomly selected 20 X fields per group). (D) Representative PLA images showing BRAF-CRAF heterodimerization in DMSO- and PLX4032-treated iM27 cells. Red dots indicate BRAF-CRAF dimers. (E) Quantification of PLA signals comparing PLX4032-treated iM27 cells with DMSO-treated iM27 cells. The data are presented as the means ± SDs (n = 9-10 randomly selected 40X fields per group). (F) Representative PLA images showing BRAF-BRAF homodimerization in DMSO- and PLX4032-treated iM27 cells. The red dots indicate BRAF-BRAF dimers. (G) Quantification of PLA signals comparing PLX4032-treated iM27 cells with DMSO-treated iM27 cells. The data are presented as the means ± SDs (n = 9-10 randomly selected 40X fields per group). (H) Representative PLA images showing CRAF-CRAF homodimerization in DMSO- and PLX4032-treated iM27 cells. The red dots indicate CRAF-CRAF dimers. (I) Quantification of PLA signals comparing PLX4032-treated iM27 cells with DMSO-treated iM27 cells. The data are presented as the means ± SDs (n = 9-10 randomly selected 40X fields per group). (J) Western blot analysis showing increased CRAF-CRAF and CRAF-BRAF interactions in PLX4032-treated iM27 cells compared with those in DMSO-treated iM27 cells. Co-IP was performed via the use of an anti-Myc antibody to pull down interacting proteins in iM27 cells coexpressing Myc-tagged and Flag-tagged CRAF. (K-M) Western blot analysis of phosphorylated BRAF (Ser445) and CRAF (Ser338) expression in iM27 (K), BRAF-deficient iM27 overexpressing wild-type BRAF or BRAF (T529N) (L), and CRAF-deficient iM27 overexpressing wild-type CRAF or CRAF (T421N) (M) treated with either DMSO or PLX4032.
Craf, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 69 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/craf/product/Proteintech
Average 95 stars, based on 69 article reviews
craf - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
95/100 stars

Images

1) Product Images from "Actin-modulated nuclear shape controls adaptive reprogramming in cancer-associated fibroblasts"

Article Title: Actin-modulated nuclear shape controls adaptive reprogramming in cancer-associated fibroblasts

Journal: bioRxiv

doi: 10.1101/2025.07.19.665630

(A) Western blot confirming effective silencing of ARAF, BRAF, or CRAF expression in iM27 cells using corresponding siRNAs. (B) Representative fluorescence microscopy images showing β-catenin expression in iM27 cells transfected with scramble siRNA or siRNAs that deplete ARAF, BRAF, or CRAF expression under PLX4032 treatment. iM27 transfected with scramble siRNA without PLX4032 treatment were used as a control. (C) Quantification of nuclear β-catenin intensity in iM27 and genetically modified iM27 cells as shown in (B) with or without PLX4032 treatment using ImageJ. The data are presented as the means ± SDs (n = 11 randomly selected 20 X fields per group). (D) Representative PLA images showing BRAF-CRAF heterodimerization in DMSO- and PLX4032-treated iM27 cells. Red dots indicate BRAF-CRAF dimers. (E) Quantification of PLA signals comparing PLX4032-treated iM27 cells with DMSO-treated iM27 cells. The data are presented as the means ± SDs (n = 9-10 randomly selected 40X fields per group). (F) Representative PLA images showing BRAF-BRAF homodimerization in DMSO- and PLX4032-treated iM27 cells. The red dots indicate BRAF-BRAF dimers. (G) Quantification of PLA signals comparing PLX4032-treated iM27 cells with DMSO-treated iM27 cells. The data are presented as the means ± SDs (n = 9-10 randomly selected 40X fields per group). (H) Representative PLA images showing CRAF-CRAF homodimerization in DMSO- and PLX4032-treated iM27 cells. The red dots indicate CRAF-CRAF dimers. (I) Quantification of PLA signals comparing PLX4032-treated iM27 cells with DMSO-treated iM27 cells. The data are presented as the means ± SDs (n = 9-10 randomly selected 40X fields per group). (J) Western blot analysis showing increased CRAF-CRAF and CRAF-BRAF interactions in PLX4032-treated iM27 cells compared with those in DMSO-treated iM27 cells. Co-IP was performed via the use of an anti-Myc antibody to pull down interacting proteins in iM27 cells coexpressing Myc-tagged and Flag-tagged CRAF. (K-M) Western blot analysis of phosphorylated BRAF (Ser445) and CRAF (Ser338) expression in iM27 (K), BRAF-deficient iM27 overexpressing wild-type BRAF or BRAF (T529N) (L), and CRAF-deficient iM27 overexpressing wild-type CRAF or CRAF (T421N) (M) treated with either DMSO or PLX4032.
Figure Legend Snippet: (A) Western blot confirming effective silencing of ARAF, BRAF, or CRAF expression in iM27 cells using corresponding siRNAs. (B) Representative fluorescence microscopy images showing β-catenin expression in iM27 cells transfected with scramble siRNA or siRNAs that deplete ARAF, BRAF, or CRAF expression under PLX4032 treatment. iM27 transfected with scramble siRNA without PLX4032 treatment were used as a control. (C) Quantification of nuclear β-catenin intensity in iM27 and genetically modified iM27 cells as shown in (B) with or without PLX4032 treatment using ImageJ. The data are presented as the means ± SDs (n = 11 randomly selected 20 X fields per group). (D) Representative PLA images showing BRAF-CRAF heterodimerization in DMSO- and PLX4032-treated iM27 cells. Red dots indicate BRAF-CRAF dimers. (E) Quantification of PLA signals comparing PLX4032-treated iM27 cells with DMSO-treated iM27 cells. The data are presented as the means ± SDs (n = 9-10 randomly selected 40X fields per group). (F) Representative PLA images showing BRAF-BRAF homodimerization in DMSO- and PLX4032-treated iM27 cells. The red dots indicate BRAF-BRAF dimers. (G) Quantification of PLA signals comparing PLX4032-treated iM27 cells with DMSO-treated iM27 cells. The data are presented as the means ± SDs (n = 9-10 randomly selected 40X fields per group). (H) Representative PLA images showing CRAF-CRAF homodimerization in DMSO- and PLX4032-treated iM27 cells. The red dots indicate CRAF-CRAF dimers. (I) Quantification of PLA signals comparing PLX4032-treated iM27 cells with DMSO-treated iM27 cells. The data are presented as the means ± SDs (n = 9-10 randomly selected 40X fields per group). (J) Western blot analysis showing increased CRAF-CRAF and CRAF-BRAF interactions in PLX4032-treated iM27 cells compared with those in DMSO-treated iM27 cells. Co-IP was performed via the use of an anti-Myc antibody to pull down interacting proteins in iM27 cells coexpressing Myc-tagged and Flag-tagged CRAF. (K-M) Western blot analysis of phosphorylated BRAF (Ser445) and CRAF (Ser338) expression in iM27 (K), BRAF-deficient iM27 overexpressing wild-type BRAF or BRAF (T529N) (L), and CRAF-deficient iM27 overexpressing wild-type CRAF or CRAF (T421N) (M) treated with either DMSO or PLX4032.

Techniques Used: Western Blot, Expressing, Fluorescence, Microscopy, Transfection, Control, Genetically Modified, Co-Immunoprecipitation Assay

(A) Western blot confirming effective silencing of KRAS, HRAS, and NRAS expression in iM27 using siRNAs. (B) PLA results showing BRAF and CRAF heterodimerization in iM27 transfected with scramble siRNA (Scr), scramble iM27 treaded with PLX4032, and RAS-deficient iM27 (siRASs) treated with PLX4032. (C) Western blot showing the phosphorylation of BRAF (Ser445) and CRAF (Ser338) in iM27 transfected with scramble siRNA and RAS-deficient iM27 with and without PLX4032 treatment. (D) Confocal images of nuclei visualized by Hoechst staining in iM27 transfected with scramble siRNA, scramble iM27 treaded with PLX4032, and RAS-deficient iM27 (siRASs) treated with PLX4032. The nuclear boundaries are outlined with yellow circles. (E-F) Quantification of nuclear morphology based on the confocal images shown in (D), including the nuclear aspect ratio (E) and circularity (F), was performed via ImageJ. The data are presented as the means ± SDs (n = 30-67 nuclei per group). (G) Confocal images of F-actin expression and organization in iM27 transfected with scramble siRNA, scramble iM27 treaded with PLX4032 (scramble), and RAS-deficient iM27 (siRASs) treated with PLX4032. Insets display enlarged views of representative individual cells (highlighted by yellow boxes). Yellow arrows indicate actin caps. (H-I) Quantification of F-actin intensity (H) and actin cap intensity (I) using ImageJ. The data are presented as the means ± SDs (n = 6 randomly selected 20 X fields per group for H; n = 25-52 nuclei per group for I). (J) Confocal images showing Nesprin-2 distribution in iM27 transfected with scramble siRNA, scramble iM27 treaded with PLX4032, and RAS-deficient iM27 (siRASs) treated with PLX4032. The yellow arrow indicates abnormal cytosolic localization of Nesprin-2. (K) Representative fluorescence images showing nuclear β-catenin staining in iM27 transfected with scramble siRNA, scramble iM27 treaded with PLX4032, and RAS-deficient iM27 (siRASs) treated with PLX4032. (L) Quantification of nuclear β-catenin intensity under the indicated conditions shown in (K). The data are presented as the means ± SDs (n = 9 randomly selected 20X fields per group).
Figure Legend Snippet: (A) Western blot confirming effective silencing of KRAS, HRAS, and NRAS expression in iM27 using siRNAs. (B) PLA results showing BRAF and CRAF heterodimerization in iM27 transfected with scramble siRNA (Scr), scramble iM27 treaded with PLX4032, and RAS-deficient iM27 (siRASs) treated with PLX4032. (C) Western blot showing the phosphorylation of BRAF (Ser445) and CRAF (Ser338) in iM27 transfected with scramble siRNA and RAS-deficient iM27 with and without PLX4032 treatment. (D) Confocal images of nuclei visualized by Hoechst staining in iM27 transfected with scramble siRNA, scramble iM27 treaded with PLX4032, and RAS-deficient iM27 (siRASs) treated with PLX4032. The nuclear boundaries are outlined with yellow circles. (E-F) Quantification of nuclear morphology based on the confocal images shown in (D), including the nuclear aspect ratio (E) and circularity (F), was performed via ImageJ. The data are presented as the means ± SDs (n = 30-67 nuclei per group). (G) Confocal images of F-actin expression and organization in iM27 transfected with scramble siRNA, scramble iM27 treaded with PLX4032 (scramble), and RAS-deficient iM27 (siRASs) treated with PLX4032. Insets display enlarged views of representative individual cells (highlighted by yellow boxes). Yellow arrows indicate actin caps. (H-I) Quantification of F-actin intensity (H) and actin cap intensity (I) using ImageJ. The data are presented as the means ± SDs (n = 6 randomly selected 20 X fields per group for H; n = 25-52 nuclei per group for I). (J) Confocal images showing Nesprin-2 distribution in iM27 transfected with scramble siRNA, scramble iM27 treaded with PLX4032, and RAS-deficient iM27 (siRASs) treated with PLX4032. The yellow arrow indicates abnormal cytosolic localization of Nesprin-2. (K) Representative fluorescence images showing nuclear β-catenin staining in iM27 transfected with scramble siRNA, scramble iM27 treaded with PLX4032, and RAS-deficient iM27 (siRASs) treated with PLX4032. (L) Quantification of nuclear β-catenin intensity under the indicated conditions shown in (K). The data are presented as the means ± SDs (n = 9 randomly selected 20X fields per group).

Techniques Used: Western Blot, Expressing, Transfection, Phospho-proteomics, Staining, Fluorescence

(A) Western blot showing increased ERK phosphorylation in response to increasing concentrations of PLX4032 in iM27 cells. (B) Western blot showing the phosphorylation of ERK in iM27 transfected with scramble siRNA and RAS-deficient iM27 (siRASs) with and without PLX4032 treatment. (C-D) Western blots showing ERK phosphorylation in BRAF-deficient iM27 overexpressing wild-type BRAF and BRAF(T529N) (C) and in CRAF-deficient iM27 overexpressing wild-type CRAF and CRAF(T421N) (D) with and without PLX4032 treatment. (E) Western blot showing increased phosphorylation of MYPT1 in PLX4032-treated iM27. (F) Western blot showing the phosphorylation of MYPT1 in iM27 treated with DMSO, PLX4032, and a combination of PLX4032 and the ERK inhibitor SCH772984 (SCH). (G) Representative confocal images of nuclear morphology visualized by Hoechst staining in iM27 treated with DMSO, PLX4032, and a combination of PLX4032 and the ROCK inhibitor Y27632. (H-I) Quantification of nuclear morphology based on the confocal images shown in (G), including the nuclear aspect ratio (H) and circularity (I), was performed via ImageJ. The data are presented as the means ± SDs (n = 27-38 nuclei per group). (J) Confocal images of F-actin expression and organization in iM27 treated with DMSO, PLX4032, and a combination of PLX4032 and the ROCK inhibitor Y27632. Insets display enlarged views of representative individual cells (highlighted by yellow boxes). Yellow arrows indicate the actin caps. (K) Quantification of the actin cap intensity via ImageJ shown in (J). The data are presented as the means ± SDs (n = 20 nuclei per group). (L) Confocal images showing SUN2 distribution in iM27 treated with DMSO, PLX4032, and a combination of PLX4032 and the ROCK inhibitor Y27632. The yellow arrow indicates abnormal nuclear localization of SUN2 in PLX4032-treated cells. (M) Representative fluorescence images showing nuclear β-catenin staining in iM27 treated with DMSO, PLX4032, and a combination of PLX4032 and the ROCK inhibitor Y27632. (N) Quantification of the nuclear β-catenin intensity under the indicated conditions shown in (M). The data are presented as the means ± SDs (n = 40 nuclei per group).
Figure Legend Snippet: (A) Western blot showing increased ERK phosphorylation in response to increasing concentrations of PLX4032 in iM27 cells. (B) Western blot showing the phosphorylation of ERK in iM27 transfected with scramble siRNA and RAS-deficient iM27 (siRASs) with and without PLX4032 treatment. (C-D) Western blots showing ERK phosphorylation in BRAF-deficient iM27 overexpressing wild-type BRAF and BRAF(T529N) (C) and in CRAF-deficient iM27 overexpressing wild-type CRAF and CRAF(T421N) (D) with and without PLX4032 treatment. (E) Western blot showing increased phosphorylation of MYPT1 in PLX4032-treated iM27. (F) Western blot showing the phosphorylation of MYPT1 in iM27 treated with DMSO, PLX4032, and a combination of PLX4032 and the ERK inhibitor SCH772984 (SCH). (G) Representative confocal images of nuclear morphology visualized by Hoechst staining in iM27 treated with DMSO, PLX4032, and a combination of PLX4032 and the ROCK inhibitor Y27632. (H-I) Quantification of nuclear morphology based on the confocal images shown in (G), including the nuclear aspect ratio (H) and circularity (I), was performed via ImageJ. The data are presented as the means ± SDs (n = 27-38 nuclei per group). (J) Confocal images of F-actin expression and organization in iM27 treated with DMSO, PLX4032, and a combination of PLX4032 and the ROCK inhibitor Y27632. Insets display enlarged views of representative individual cells (highlighted by yellow boxes). Yellow arrows indicate the actin caps. (K) Quantification of the actin cap intensity via ImageJ shown in (J). The data are presented as the means ± SDs (n = 20 nuclei per group). (L) Confocal images showing SUN2 distribution in iM27 treated with DMSO, PLX4032, and a combination of PLX4032 and the ROCK inhibitor Y27632. The yellow arrow indicates abnormal nuclear localization of SUN2 in PLX4032-treated cells. (M) Representative fluorescence images showing nuclear β-catenin staining in iM27 treated with DMSO, PLX4032, and a combination of PLX4032 and the ROCK inhibitor Y27632. (N) Quantification of the nuclear β-catenin intensity under the indicated conditions shown in (M). The data are presented as the means ± SDs (n = 40 nuclei per group).

Techniques Used: Western Blot, Phospho-proteomics, Transfection, Staining, Expressing, Fluorescence



Similar Products

95
Proteintech craf
(A) Western blot confirming effective silencing of ARAF, BRAF, or <t>CRAF</t> expression in iM27 cells using corresponding siRNAs. (B) Representative fluorescence microscopy images showing β-catenin expression in iM27 cells transfected with scramble siRNA or siRNAs that deplete ARAF, BRAF, or CRAF expression under PLX4032 treatment. iM27 transfected with scramble siRNA without PLX4032 treatment were used as a control. (C) Quantification of nuclear β-catenin intensity in iM27 and genetically modified iM27 cells as shown in (B) with or without PLX4032 treatment using ImageJ. The data are presented as the means ± SDs (n = 11 randomly selected 20 X fields per group). (D) Representative PLA images showing BRAF-CRAF heterodimerization in DMSO- and PLX4032-treated iM27 cells. Red dots indicate BRAF-CRAF dimers. (E) Quantification of PLA signals comparing PLX4032-treated iM27 cells with DMSO-treated iM27 cells. The data are presented as the means ± SDs (n = 9-10 randomly selected 40X fields per group). (F) Representative PLA images showing BRAF-BRAF homodimerization in DMSO- and PLX4032-treated iM27 cells. The red dots indicate BRAF-BRAF dimers. (G) Quantification of PLA signals comparing PLX4032-treated iM27 cells with DMSO-treated iM27 cells. The data are presented as the means ± SDs (n = 9-10 randomly selected 40X fields per group). (H) Representative PLA images showing CRAF-CRAF homodimerization in DMSO- and PLX4032-treated iM27 cells. The red dots indicate CRAF-CRAF dimers. (I) Quantification of PLA signals comparing PLX4032-treated iM27 cells with DMSO-treated iM27 cells. The data are presented as the means ± SDs (n = 9-10 randomly selected 40X fields per group). (J) Western blot analysis showing increased CRAF-CRAF and CRAF-BRAF interactions in PLX4032-treated iM27 cells compared with those in DMSO-treated iM27 cells. Co-IP was performed via the use of an anti-Myc antibody to pull down interacting proteins in iM27 cells coexpressing Myc-tagged and Flag-tagged CRAF. (K-M) Western blot analysis of phosphorylated BRAF (Ser445) and CRAF (Ser338) expression in iM27 (K), BRAF-deficient iM27 overexpressing wild-type BRAF or BRAF (T529N) (L), and CRAF-deficient iM27 overexpressing wild-type CRAF or CRAF (T421N) (M) treated with either DMSO or PLX4032.
Craf, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/craf/product/Proteintech
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
craf - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
Cell Signaling Technology Inc anti craf
(A) Western blot confirming effective silencing of ARAF, BRAF, or <t>CRAF</t> expression in iM27 cells using corresponding siRNAs. (B) Representative fluorescence microscopy images showing β-catenin expression in iM27 cells transfected with scramble siRNA or siRNAs that deplete ARAF, BRAF, or CRAF expression under PLX4032 treatment. iM27 transfected with scramble siRNA without PLX4032 treatment were used as a control. (C) Quantification of nuclear β-catenin intensity in iM27 and genetically modified iM27 cells as shown in (B) with or without PLX4032 treatment using ImageJ. The data are presented as the means ± SDs (n = 11 randomly selected 20 X fields per group). (D) Representative PLA images showing BRAF-CRAF heterodimerization in DMSO- and PLX4032-treated iM27 cells. Red dots indicate BRAF-CRAF dimers. (E) Quantification of PLA signals comparing PLX4032-treated iM27 cells with DMSO-treated iM27 cells. The data are presented as the means ± SDs (n = 9-10 randomly selected 40X fields per group). (F) Representative PLA images showing BRAF-BRAF homodimerization in DMSO- and PLX4032-treated iM27 cells. The red dots indicate BRAF-BRAF dimers. (G) Quantification of PLA signals comparing PLX4032-treated iM27 cells with DMSO-treated iM27 cells. The data are presented as the means ± SDs (n = 9-10 randomly selected 40X fields per group). (H) Representative PLA images showing CRAF-CRAF homodimerization in DMSO- and PLX4032-treated iM27 cells. The red dots indicate CRAF-CRAF dimers. (I) Quantification of PLA signals comparing PLX4032-treated iM27 cells with DMSO-treated iM27 cells. The data are presented as the means ± SDs (n = 9-10 randomly selected 40X fields per group). (J) Western blot analysis showing increased CRAF-CRAF and CRAF-BRAF interactions in PLX4032-treated iM27 cells compared with those in DMSO-treated iM27 cells. Co-IP was performed via the use of an anti-Myc antibody to pull down interacting proteins in iM27 cells coexpressing Myc-tagged and Flag-tagged CRAF. (K-M) Western blot analysis of phosphorylated BRAF (Ser445) and CRAF (Ser338) expression in iM27 (K), BRAF-deficient iM27 overexpressing wild-type BRAF or BRAF (T529N) (L), and CRAF-deficient iM27 overexpressing wild-type CRAF or CRAF (T421N) (M) treated with either DMSO or PLX4032.
Anti Craf, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/anti craf/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti craf - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Cusabio craf antibody
(A) Western blot confirming effective silencing of ARAF, BRAF, or <t>CRAF</t> expression in iM27 cells using corresponding siRNAs. (B) Representative fluorescence microscopy images showing β-catenin expression in iM27 cells transfected with scramble siRNA or siRNAs that deplete ARAF, BRAF, or CRAF expression under PLX4032 treatment. iM27 transfected with scramble siRNA without PLX4032 treatment were used as a control. (C) Quantification of nuclear β-catenin intensity in iM27 and genetically modified iM27 cells as shown in (B) with or without PLX4032 treatment using ImageJ. The data are presented as the means ± SDs (n = 11 randomly selected 20 X fields per group). (D) Representative PLA images showing BRAF-CRAF heterodimerization in DMSO- and PLX4032-treated iM27 cells. Red dots indicate BRAF-CRAF dimers. (E) Quantification of PLA signals comparing PLX4032-treated iM27 cells with DMSO-treated iM27 cells. The data are presented as the means ± SDs (n = 9-10 randomly selected 40X fields per group). (F) Representative PLA images showing BRAF-BRAF homodimerization in DMSO- and PLX4032-treated iM27 cells. The red dots indicate BRAF-BRAF dimers. (G) Quantification of PLA signals comparing PLX4032-treated iM27 cells with DMSO-treated iM27 cells. The data are presented as the means ± SDs (n = 9-10 randomly selected 40X fields per group). (H) Representative PLA images showing CRAF-CRAF homodimerization in DMSO- and PLX4032-treated iM27 cells. The red dots indicate CRAF-CRAF dimers. (I) Quantification of PLA signals comparing PLX4032-treated iM27 cells with DMSO-treated iM27 cells. The data are presented as the means ± SDs (n = 9-10 randomly selected 40X fields per group). (J) Western blot analysis showing increased CRAF-CRAF and CRAF-BRAF interactions in PLX4032-treated iM27 cells compared with those in DMSO-treated iM27 cells. Co-IP was performed via the use of an anti-Myc antibody to pull down interacting proteins in iM27 cells coexpressing Myc-tagged and Flag-tagged CRAF. (K-M) Western blot analysis of phosphorylated BRAF (Ser445) and CRAF (Ser338) expression in iM27 (K), BRAF-deficient iM27 overexpressing wild-type BRAF or BRAF (T529N) (L), and CRAF-deficient iM27 overexpressing wild-type CRAF or CRAF (T421N) (M) treated with either DMSO or PLX4032.
Craf Antibody, supplied by Cusabio, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/craf antibody/product/Cusabio
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
craf antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
Cell Signaling Technology Inc craf
Effects of NRG1 silencing on esophageal squamous cell carcinoma cell signaling and cell proliferation. (A) NRG1 mRNA levels were examined by quantitative PCR. (B) Protein levels of NRG1 and its downstream <t>regulators</t> <t>(AKT</t> and <t>cRAF)</t> in transfected cells were determined by immunoblotting to verify the silencing efficiency of siNRG1. (C) Levels of protein. (D) Cells were transfected with 1 or 10 nM siRNA for 72 h and viability was assessed by CellTiter-Glo. (E) Cell impedance following silencing. (F) Colony formation of NRG1-silenced cancer cells. * P<0.05, ** P<0.01, *** P<0.001 vs. siCtrl. NRG, neuregulin-1; cRAF, cellular rapidly accelerated fibrosarcoma; si, small interfering; Ctrl, control; p-, phosphorylated; ACTB, β-actin.
Craf, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/craf/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
craf - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Cell Signaling Technology Inc primary antibodies against p-cellular rapidly accelerated fibrosarcoma (p-craf)
Effects of NRG1 silencing on esophageal squamous cell carcinoma cell signaling and cell proliferation. (A) NRG1 mRNA levels were examined by quantitative PCR. (B) Protein levels of NRG1 and its downstream regulators (AKT and cRAF) in transfected cells were determined by immunoblotting to verify the silencing efficiency of siNRG1. (C) Levels of protein. (D) Cells were transfected with 1 or 10 nM siRNA for 72 h and viability was assessed by CellTiter-Glo. (E) Cell impedance following silencing. (F) Colony formation of NRG1-silenced cancer cells. * P<0.05, ** P<0.01, *** P<0.001 vs. siCtrl. NRG, neuregulin-1; cRAF, cellular rapidly accelerated <t>fibrosarcoma;</t> si, small interfering; Ctrl, control; p-, phosphorylated; ACTB, β-actin.
Primary Antibodies Against P Cellular Rapidly Accelerated Fibrosarcoma (P Craf), supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/primary antibodies against p-cellular rapidly accelerated fibrosarcoma (p-craf)/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
primary antibodies against p-cellular rapidly accelerated fibrosarcoma (p-craf) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
Cell Signaling Technology Inc anti phospho craf ser259
Effects of NRG1 silencing on esophageal squamous cell carcinoma cell signaling and cell proliferation. (A) NRG1 mRNA levels were examined by quantitative PCR. (B) Protein levels of NRG1 and its downstream regulators (AKT and cRAF) in transfected cells were determined by immunoblotting to verify the silencing efficiency of siNRG1. (C) Levels of protein. (D) Cells were transfected with 1 or 10 nM siRNA for 72 h and viability was assessed by CellTiter-Glo. (E) Cell impedance following silencing. (F) Colony formation of NRG1-silenced cancer cells. * P<0.05, ** P<0.01, *** P<0.001 vs. siCtrl. NRG, neuregulin-1; cRAF, cellular rapidly accelerated <t>fibrosarcoma;</t> si, small interfering; Ctrl, control; p-, phosphorylated; ACTB, β-actin.
Anti Phospho Craf Ser259, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/anti phospho craf ser259/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti phospho craf ser259 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


(A) Western blot confirming effective silencing of ARAF, BRAF, or CRAF expression in iM27 cells using corresponding siRNAs. (B) Representative fluorescence microscopy images showing β-catenin expression in iM27 cells transfected with scramble siRNA or siRNAs that deplete ARAF, BRAF, or CRAF expression under PLX4032 treatment. iM27 transfected with scramble siRNA without PLX4032 treatment were used as a control. (C) Quantification of nuclear β-catenin intensity in iM27 and genetically modified iM27 cells as shown in (B) with or without PLX4032 treatment using ImageJ. The data are presented as the means ± SDs (n = 11 randomly selected 20 X fields per group). (D) Representative PLA images showing BRAF-CRAF heterodimerization in DMSO- and PLX4032-treated iM27 cells. Red dots indicate BRAF-CRAF dimers. (E) Quantification of PLA signals comparing PLX4032-treated iM27 cells with DMSO-treated iM27 cells. The data are presented as the means ± SDs (n = 9-10 randomly selected 40X fields per group). (F) Representative PLA images showing BRAF-BRAF homodimerization in DMSO- and PLX4032-treated iM27 cells. The red dots indicate BRAF-BRAF dimers. (G) Quantification of PLA signals comparing PLX4032-treated iM27 cells with DMSO-treated iM27 cells. The data are presented as the means ± SDs (n = 9-10 randomly selected 40X fields per group). (H) Representative PLA images showing CRAF-CRAF homodimerization in DMSO- and PLX4032-treated iM27 cells. The red dots indicate CRAF-CRAF dimers. (I) Quantification of PLA signals comparing PLX4032-treated iM27 cells with DMSO-treated iM27 cells. The data are presented as the means ± SDs (n = 9-10 randomly selected 40X fields per group). (J) Western blot analysis showing increased CRAF-CRAF and CRAF-BRAF interactions in PLX4032-treated iM27 cells compared with those in DMSO-treated iM27 cells. Co-IP was performed via the use of an anti-Myc antibody to pull down interacting proteins in iM27 cells coexpressing Myc-tagged and Flag-tagged CRAF. (K-M) Western blot analysis of phosphorylated BRAF (Ser445) and CRAF (Ser338) expression in iM27 (K), BRAF-deficient iM27 overexpressing wild-type BRAF or BRAF (T529N) (L), and CRAF-deficient iM27 overexpressing wild-type CRAF or CRAF (T421N) (M) treated with either DMSO or PLX4032.

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: Actin-modulated nuclear shape controls adaptive reprogramming in cancer-associated fibroblasts

doi: 10.1101/2025.07.19.665630

Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Western blot confirming effective silencing of ARAF, BRAF, or CRAF expression in iM27 cells using corresponding siRNAs. (B) Representative fluorescence microscopy images showing β-catenin expression in iM27 cells transfected with scramble siRNA or siRNAs that deplete ARAF, BRAF, or CRAF expression under PLX4032 treatment. iM27 transfected with scramble siRNA without PLX4032 treatment were used as a control. (C) Quantification of nuclear β-catenin intensity in iM27 and genetically modified iM27 cells as shown in (B) with or without PLX4032 treatment using ImageJ. The data are presented as the means ± SDs (n = 11 randomly selected 20 X fields per group). (D) Representative PLA images showing BRAF-CRAF heterodimerization in DMSO- and PLX4032-treated iM27 cells. Red dots indicate BRAF-CRAF dimers. (E) Quantification of PLA signals comparing PLX4032-treated iM27 cells with DMSO-treated iM27 cells. The data are presented as the means ± SDs (n = 9-10 randomly selected 40X fields per group). (F) Representative PLA images showing BRAF-BRAF homodimerization in DMSO- and PLX4032-treated iM27 cells. The red dots indicate BRAF-BRAF dimers. (G) Quantification of PLA signals comparing PLX4032-treated iM27 cells with DMSO-treated iM27 cells. The data are presented as the means ± SDs (n = 9-10 randomly selected 40X fields per group). (H) Representative PLA images showing CRAF-CRAF homodimerization in DMSO- and PLX4032-treated iM27 cells. The red dots indicate CRAF-CRAF dimers. (I) Quantification of PLA signals comparing PLX4032-treated iM27 cells with DMSO-treated iM27 cells. The data are presented as the means ± SDs (n = 9-10 randomly selected 40X fields per group). (J) Western blot analysis showing increased CRAF-CRAF and CRAF-BRAF interactions in PLX4032-treated iM27 cells compared with those in DMSO-treated iM27 cells. Co-IP was performed via the use of an anti-Myc antibody to pull down interacting proteins in iM27 cells coexpressing Myc-tagged and Flag-tagged CRAF. (K-M) Western blot analysis of phosphorylated BRAF (Ser445) and CRAF (Ser338) expression in iM27 (K), BRAF-deficient iM27 overexpressing wild-type BRAF or BRAF (T529N) (L), and CRAF-deficient iM27 overexpressing wild-type CRAF or CRAF (T421N) (M) treated with either DMSO or PLX4032.

Article Snippet: Afterwards, the cells were blocked with Duolink blocking solution for one hour at 37°C and then incubated overnight at 4°C with the following primary antibodies: BRAF (Proteintech, 20899-1-AP), CRAF (Proteintech, clone 1D6A1), FLAG (Proteintech, 20543-1-AP), or MYC (Proteintech, clone 1A5A2).

Techniques: Western Blot, Expressing, Fluorescence, Microscopy, Transfection, Control, Genetically Modified, Co-Immunoprecipitation Assay

(A) Western blot confirming effective silencing of KRAS, HRAS, and NRAS expression in iM27 using siRNAs. (B) PLA results showing BRAF and CRAF heterodimerization in iM27 transfected with scramble siRNA (Scr), scramble iM27 treaded with PLX4032, and RAS-deficient iM27 (siRASs) treated with PLX4032. (C) Western blot showing the phosphorylation of BRAF (Ser445) and CRAF (Ser338) in iM27 transfected with scramble siRNA and RAS-deficient iM27 with and without PLX4032 treatment. (D) Confocal images of nuclei visualized by Hoechst staining in iM27 transfected with scramble siRNA, scramble iM27 treaded with PLX4032, and RAS-deficient iM27 (siRASs) treated with PLX4032. The nuclear boundaries are outlined with yellow circles. (E-F) Quantification of nuclear morphology based on the confocal images shown in (D), including the nuclear aspect ratio (E) and circularity (F), was performed via ImageJ. The data are presented as the means ± SDs (n = 30-67 nuclei per group). (G) Confocal images of F-actin expression and organization in iM27 transfected with scramble siRNA, scramble iM27 treaded with PLX4032 (scramble), and RAS-deficient iM27 (siRASs) treated with PLX4032. Insets display enlarged views of representative individual cells (highlighted by yellow boxes). Yellow arrows indicate actin caps. (H-I) Quantification of F-actin intensity (H) and actin cap intensity (I) using ImageJ. The data are presented as the means ± SDs (n = 6 randomly selected 20 X fields per group for H; n = 25-52 nuclei per group for I). (J) Confocal images showing Nesprin-2 distribution in iM27 transfected with scramble siRNA, scramble iM27 treaded with PLX4032, and RAS-deficient iM27 (siRASs) treated with PLX4032. The yellow arrow indicates abnormal cytosolic localization of Nesprin-2. (K) Representative fluorescence images showing nuclear β-catenin staining in iM27 transfected with scramble siRNA, scramble iM27 treaded with PLX4032, and RAS-deficient iM27 (siRASs) treated with PLX4032. (L) Quantification of nuclear β-catenin intensity under the indicated conditions shown in (K). The data are presented as the means ± SDs (n = 9 randomly selected 20X fields per group).

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: Actin-modulated nuclear shape controls adaptive reprogramming in cancer-associated fibroblasts

doi: 10.1101/2025.07.19.665630

Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Western blot confirming effective silencing of KRAS, HRAS, and NRAS expression in iM27 using siRNAs. (B) PLA results showing BRAF and CRAF heterodimerization in iM27 transfected with scramble siRNA (Scr), scramble iM27 treaded with PLX4032, and RAS-deficient iM27 (siRASs) treated with PLX4032. (C) Western blot showing the phosphorylation of BRAF (Ser445) and CRAF (Ser338) in iM27 transfected with scramble siRNA and RAS-deficient iM27 with and without PLX4032 treatment. (D) Confocal images of nuclei visualized by Hoechst staining in iM27 transfected with scramble siRNA, scramble iM27 treaded with PLX4032, and RAS-deficient iM27 (siRASs) treated with PLX4032. The nuclear boundaries are outlined with yellow circles. (E-F) Quantification of nuclear morphology based on the confocal images shown in (D), including the nuclear aspect ratio (E) and circularity (F), was performed via ImageJ. The data are presented as the means ± SDs (n = 30-67 nuclei per group). (G) Confocal images of F-actin expression and organization in iM27 transfected with scramble siRNA, scramble iM27 treaded with PLX4032 (scramble), and RAS-deficient iM27 (siRASs) treated with PLX4032. Insets display enlarged views of representative individual cells (highlighted by yellow boxes). Yellow arrows indicate actin caps. (H-I) Quantification of F-actin intensity (H) and actin cap intensity (I) using ImageJ. The data are presented as the means ± SDs (n = 6 randomly selected 20 X fields per group for H; n = 25-52 nuclei per group for I). (J) Confocal images showing Nesprin-2 distribution in iM27 transfected with scramble siRNA, scramble iM27 treaded with PLX4032, and RAS-deficient iM27 (siRASs) treated with PLX4032. The yellow arrow indicates abnormal cytosolic localization of Nesprin-2. (K) Representative fluorescence images showing nuclear β-catenin staining in iM27 transfected with scramble siRNA, scramble iM27 treaded with PLX4032, and RAS-deficient iM27 (siRASs) treated with PLX4032. (L) Quantification of nuclear β-catenin intensity under the indicated conditions shown in (K). The data are presented as the means ± SDs (n = 9 randomly selected 20X fields per group).

Article Snippet: Afterwards, the cells were blocked with Duolink blocking solution for one hour at 37°C and then incubated overnight at 4°C with the following primary antibodies: BRAF (Proteintech, 20899-1-AP), CRAF (Proteintech, clone 1D6A1), FLAG (Proteintech, 20543-1-AP), or MYC (Proteintech, clone 1A5A2).

Techniques: Western Blot, Expressing, Transfection, Phospho-proteomics, Staining, Fluorescence

(A) Western blot showing increased ERK phosphorylation in response to increasing concentrations of PLX4032 in iM27 cells. (B) Western blot showing the phosphorylation of ERK in iM27 transfected with scramble siRNA and RAS-deficient iM27 (siRASs) with and without PLX4032 treatment. (C-D) Western blots showing ERK phosphorylation in BRAF-deficient iM27 overexpressing wild-type BRAF and BRAF(T529N) (C) and in CRAF-deficient iM27 overexpressing wild-type CRAF and CRAF(T421N) (D) with and without PLX4032 treatment. (E) Western blot showing increased phosphorylation of MYPT1 in PLX4032-treated iM27. (F) Western blot showing the phosphorylation of MYPT1 in iM27 treated with DMSO, PLX4032, and a combination of PLX4032 and the ERK inhibitor SCH772984 (SCH). (G) Representative confocal images of nuclear morphology visualized by Hoechst staining in iM27 treated with DMSO, PLX4032, and a combination of PLX4032 and the ROCK inhibitor Y27632. (H-I) Quantification of nuclear morphology based on the confocal images shown in (G), including the nuclear aspect ratio (H) and circularity (I), was performed via ImageJ. The data are presented as the means ± SDs (n = 27-38 nuclei per group). (J) Confocal images of F-actin expression and organization in iM27 treated with DMSO, PLX4032, and a combination of PLX4032 and the ROCK inhibitor Y27632. Insets display enlarged views of representative individual cells (highlighted by yellow boxes). Yellow arrows indicate the actin caps. (K) Quantification of the actin cap intensity via ImageJ shown in (J). The data are presented as the means ± SDs (n = 20 nuclei per group). (L) Confocal images showing SUN2 distribution in iM27 treated with DMSO, PLX4032, and a combination of PLX4032 and the ROCK inhibitor Y27632. The yellow arrow indicates abnormal nuclear localization of SUN2 in PLX4032-treated cells. (M) Representative fluorescence images showing nuclear β-catenin staining in iM27 treated with DMSO, PLX4032, and a combination of PLX4032 and the ROCK inhibitor Y27632. (N) Quantification of the nuclear β-catenin intensity under the indicated conditions shown in (M). The data are presented as the means ± SDs (n = 40 nuclei per group).

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: Actin-modulated nuclear shape controls adaptive reprogramming in cancer-associated fibroblasts

doi: 10.1101/2025.07.19.665630

Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Western blot showing increased ERK phosphorylation in response to increasing concentrations of PLX4032 in iM27 cells. (B) Western blot showing the phosphorylation of ERK in iM27 transfected with scramble siRNA and RAS-deficient iM27 (siRASs) with and without PLX4032 treatment. (C-D) Western blots showing ERK phosphorylation in BRAF-deficient iM27 overexpressing wild-type BRAF and BRAF(T529N) (C) and in CRAF-deficient iM27 overexpressing wild-type CRAF and CRAF(T421N) (D) with and without PLX4032 treatment. (E) Western blot showing increased phosphorylation of MYPT1 in PLX4032-treated iM27. (F) Western blot showing the phosphorylation of MYPT1 in iM27 treated with DMSO, PLX4032, and a combination of PLX4032 and the ERK inhibitor SCH772984 (SCH). (G) Representative confocal images of nuclear morphology visualized by Hoechst staining in iM27 treated with DMSO, PLX4032, and a combination of PLX4032 and the ROCK inhibitor Y27632. (H-I) Quantification of nuclear morphology based on the confocal images shown in (G), including the nuclear aspect ratio (H) and circularity (I), was performed via ImageJ. The data are presented as the means ± SDs (n = 27-38 nuclei per group). (J) Confocal images of F-actin expression and organization in iM27 treated with DMSO, PLX4032, and a combination of PLX4032 and the ROCK inhibitor Y27632. Insets display enlarged views of representative individual cells (highlighted by yellow boxes). Yellow arrows indicate the actin caps. (K) Quantification of the actin cap intensity via ImageJ shown in (J). The data are presented as the means ± SDs (n = 20 nuclei per group). (L) Confocal images showing SUN2 distribution in iM27 treated with DMSO, PLX4032, and a combination of PLX4032 and the ROCK inhibitor Y27632. The yellow arrow indicates abnormal nuclear localization of SUN2 in PLX4032-treated cells. (M) Representative fluorescence images showing nuclear β-catenin staining in iM27 treated with DMSO, PLX4032, and a combination of PLX4032 and the ROCK inhibitor Y27632. (N) Quantification of the nuclear β-catenin intensity under the indicated conditions shown in (M). The data are presented as the means ± SDs (n = 40 nuclei per group).

Article Snippet: Afterwards, the cells were blocked with Duolink blocking solution for one hour at 37°C and then incubated overnight at 4°C with the following primary antibodies: BRAF (Proteintech, 20899-1-AP), CRAF (Proteintech, clone 1D6A1), FLAG (Proteintech, 20543-1-AP), or MYC (Proteintech, clone 1A5A2).

Techniques: Western Blot, Phospho-proteomics, Transfection, Staining, Expressing, Fluorescence

Effects of NRG1 silencing on esophageal squamous cell carcinoma cell signaling and cell proliferation. (A) NRG1 mRNA levels were examined by quantitative PCR. (B) Protein levels of NRG1 and its downstream regulators (AKT and cRAF) in transfected cells were determined by immunoblotting to verify the silencing efficiency of siNRG1. (C) Levels of protein. (D) Cells were transfected with 1 or 10 nM siRNA for 72 h and viability was assessed by CellTiter-Glo. (E) Cell impedance following silencing. (F) Colony formation of NRG1-silenced cancer cells. * P<0.05, ** P<0.01, *** P<0.001 vs. siCtrl. NRG, neuregulin-1; cRAF, cellular rapidly accelerated fibrosarcoma; si, small interfering; Ctrl, control; p-, phosphorylated; ACTB, β-actin.

Journal: International Journal of Molecular Medicine

Article Title: Elevated neuregulin-1 expression modulates tumor malignancy and autophagy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2025.5503

Figure Lengend Snippet: Effects of NRG1 silencing on esophageal squamous cell carcinoma cell signaling and cell proliferation. (A) NRG1 mRNA levels were examined by quantitative PCR. (B) Protein levels of NRG1 and its downstream regulators (AKT and cRAF) in transfected cells were determined by immunoblotting to verify the silencing efficiency of siNRG1. (C) Levels of protein. (D) Cells were transfected with 1 or 10 nM siRNA for 72 h and viability was assessed by CellTiter-Glo. (E) Cell impedance following silencing. (F) Colony formation of NRG1-silenced cancer cells. * P<0.05, ** P<0.01, *** P<0.001 vs. siCtrl. NRG, neuregulin-1; cRAF, cellular rapidly accelerated fibrosarcoma; si, small interfering; Ctrl, control; p-, phosphorylated; ACTB, β-actin.

Article Snippet: The membranes were blocked with 5% BSA (cat. no. A5611; Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA) at room temperature for 3 h and incubated with 1,000-fold diluted primary antibodies against NRG1 (cat. no. ab191139, Abcam), phosphorylated (p-)AKT (cat. no. 4060), AKT (cat. no. 4691), p-cellular rapidly accelerated fibrosarcoma (p-cRAF; cat. no. 9427), cRAF (cat. no. 53745), β-actin (cat. no. 3700; all Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.), LC3B (cat. no. ARG55799) and p62 (cat. no. ARG55040; both Arigo Biolaboratories Corp.) at 4°C overnight.

Techniques: Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction, Transfection, Western Blot, Control

Clinical association between gene expression of NRG1, cRAF and AKT in patients with ESCC. Based on an ESCC dataset from The Cancer Genome Atlas, Kaplan-Meier plots were used to analyze the association between NRG1 and cRAF expression of patients with ESCC and (A) overall, (B) progression-free interval, (C) disease-specific and (D) disease-free interval survival. Association between NRG1 and AKT gene expression and (E) overall (F) progression-free interval, (G) disease-specific and (H) disease-free interval survival. NRG, neuregulin-1; ESCC, esophageal squamous cell carcinoma; cRAF, cellular rapidly accelerated fibrosarcoma; L, low; H, high expression; Either, NRG1(H) cRAF(L) or NRG1(L)/cRAF(H); yrs, years.

Journal: International Journal of Molecular Medicine

Article Title: Elevated neuregulin-1 expression modulates tumor malignancy and autophagy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2025.5503

Figure Lengend Snippet: Clinical association between gene expression of NRG1, cRAF and AKT in patients with ESCC. Based on an ESCC dataset from The Cancer Genome Atlas, Kaplan-Meier plots were used to analyze the association between NRG1 and cRAF expression of patients with ESCC and (A) overall, (B) progression-free interval, (C) disease-specific and (D) disease-free interval survival. Association between NRG1 and AKT gene expression and (E) overall (F) progression-free interval, (G) disease-specific and (H) disease-free interval survival. NRG, neuregulin-1; ESCC, esophageal squamous cell carcinoma; cRAF, cellular rapidly accelerated fibrosarcoma; L, low; H, high expression; Either, NRG1(H) cRAF(L) or NRG1(L)/cRAF(H); yrs, years.

Article Snippet: The membranes were blocked with 5% BSA (cat. no. A5611; Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA) at room temperature for 3 h and incubated with 1,000-fold diluted primary antibodies against NRG1 (cat. no. ab191139, Abcam), phosphorylated (p-)AKT (cat. no. 4060), AKT (cat. no. 4691), p-cellular rapidly accelerated fibrosarcoma (p-cRAF; cat. no. 9427), cRAF (cat. no. 53745), β-actin (cat. no. 3700; all Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.), LC3B (cat. no. ARG55799) and p62 (cat. no. ARG55040; both Arigo Biolaboratories Corp.) at 4°C overnight.

Techniques: Gene Expression, Expressing

Effects of NRG1 silencing on esophageal squamous cell carcinoma cell signaling and cell proliferation. (A) NRG1 mRNA levels were examined by quantitative PCR. (B) Protein levels of NRG1 and its downstream regulators (AKT and cRAF) in transfected cells were determined by immunoblotting to verify the silencing efficiency of siNRG1. (C) Levels of protein. (D) Cells were transfected with 1 or 10 nM siRNA for 72 h and viability was assessed by CellTiter-Glo. (E) Cell impedance following silencing. (F) Colony formation of NRG1-silenced cancer cells. * P<0.05, ** P<0.01, *** P<0.001 vs. siCtrl. NRG, neuregulin-1; cRAF, cellular rapidly accelerated fibrosarcoma; si, small interfering; Ctrl, control; p-, phosphorylated; ACTB, β-actin.

Journal: International Journal of Molecular Medicine

Article Title: Elevated neuregulin-1 expression modulates tumor malignancy and autophagy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2025.5503

Figure Lengend Snippet: Effects of NRG1 silencing on esophageal squamous cell carcinoma cell signaling and cell proliferation. (A) NRG1 mRNA levels were examined by quantitative PCR. (B) Protein levels of NRG1 and its downstream regulators (AKT and cRAF) in transfected cells were determined by immunoblotting to verify the silencing efficiency of siNRG1. (C) Levels of protein. (D) Cells were transfected with 1 or 10 nM siRNA for 72 h and viability was assessed by CellTiter-Glo. (E) Cell impedance following silencing. (F) Colony formation of NRG1-silenced cancer cells. * P<0.05, ** P<0.01, *** P<0.001 vs. siCtrl. NRG, neuregulin-1; cRAF, cellular rapidly accelerated fibrosarcoma; si, small interfering; Ctrl, control; p-, phosphorylated; ACTB, β-actin.

Article Snippet: The membranes were blocked with 5% BSA (cat. no. A5611; Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA) at room temperature for 3 h and incubated with 1,000-fold diluted primary antibodies against NRG1 (cat. no. ab191139, Abcam), phosphorylated (p-)AKT (cat. no. 4060), AKT (cat. no. 4691), p-cellular rapidly accelerated fibrosarcoma (p-cRAF; cat. no. 9427), cRAF (cat. no. 53745), β-actin (cat. no. 3700; all Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.), LC3B (cat. no. ARG55799) and p62 (cat. no. ARG55040; both Arigo Biolaboratories Corp.) at 4°C overnight.

Techniques: Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction, Transfection, Western Blot, Control

Clinical association between gene expression of NRG1, cRAF and AKT in patients with ESCC. Based on an ESCC dataset from The Cancer Genome Atlas, Kaplan-Meier plots were used to analyze the association between NRG1 and cRAF expression of patients with ESCC and (A) overall, (B) progression-free interval, (C) disease-specific and (D) disease-free interval survival. Association between NRG1 and AKT gene expression and (E) overall (F) progression-free interval, (G) disease-specific and (H) disease-free interval survival. NRG, neuregulin-1; ESCC, esophageal squamous cell carcinoma; cRAF, cellular rapidly accelerated fibrosarcoma; L, low; H, high expression; Either, NRG1(H) cRAF(L) or NRG1(L)/cRAF(H); yrs, years.

Journal: International Journal of Molecular Medicine

Article Title: Elevated neuregulin-1 expression modulates tumor malignancy and autophagy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2025.5503

Figure Lengend Snippet: Clinical association between gene expression of NRG1, cRAF and AKT in patients with ESCC. Based on an ESCC dataset from The Cancer Genome Atlas, Kaplan-Meier plots were used to analyze the association between NRG1 and cRAF expression of patients with ESCC and (A) overall, (B) progression-free interval, (C) disease-specific and (D) disease-free interval survival. Association between NRG1 and AKT gene expression and (E) overall (F) progression-free interval, (G) disease-specific and (H) disease-free interval survival. NRG, neuregulin-1; ESCC, esophageal squamous cell carcinoma; cRAF, cellular rapidly accelerated fibrosarcoma; L, low; H, high expression; Either, NRG1(H) cRAF(L) or NRG1(L)/cRAF(H); yrs, years.

Article Snippet: The membranes were blocked with 5% BSA (cat. no. A5611; Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA) at room temperature for 3 h and incubated with 1,000-fold diluted primary antibodies against NRG1 (cat. no. ab191139, Abcam), phosphorylated (p-)AKT (cat. no. 4060), AKT (cat. no. 4691), p-cellular rapidly accelerated fibrosarcoma (p-cRAF; cat. no. 9427), cRAF (cat. no. 53745), β-actin (cat. no. 3700; all Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.), LC3B (cat. no. ARG55799) and p62 (cat. no. ARG55040; both Arigo Biolaboratories Corp.) at 4°C overnight.

Techniques: Gene Expression, Expressing