adenosine a2a receptor a2ar antagonist sch58261 (MedChemExpress)
Structured Review

Adenosine A2a Receptor A2ar Antagonist Sch58261, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 26 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/adenosine a2a receptor a2ar antagonist sch58261/product/MedChemExpress
Average 94 stars, based on 26 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Immunomodulatory supramolecular hydrogel for rheumatoid arthritis management via adenosine A2A receptor-mediated macrophage remodeling"
Article Title: Immunomodulatory supramolecular hydrogel for rheumatoid arthritis management via adenosine A2A receptor-mediated macrophage remodeling
Journal: Bioactive Materials
doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2025.11.031
Figure Legend Snippet: The design of an inflammatory macrophages-targeted, acid-sensitive PNSH for delivery MTX and its role in promoting A2AR activation on M2 macrophages for arthritis therapy. (A)The structure of acid-sensitive polymer-nanomedicine supramolecular hydrogels, composed of drug-loaded MTX NPs. (B) Schematic illustration of arthritis therapy targeting inflammatory joint network via mPECN NPs-mediated release of MTX. This approach leverages MTX targeting the A2AR and repolarization of macrophages from the pro-inflammatory M1 phenotype to the anti-inflammatory M2 phenotype. Activation of A2AR and macrophage repolarization by mPECN-MTX NPs synergistically enhanced the anti-inflammatory effect of PNSH-mediated nanomedicine in an arthritis rat model.
Techniques Used: Activation Assay, Polymer
Figure Legend Snippet: MTX@PNSH promotes anti-inflammatory M2 macrophages through the A2AR signaling pathway. (A) The intracellular cAMP levels in Raw 264.7 cells were determined by homogeneous time-resolved fluorescence (HTRF) following different treatments. (B) qRT-PCR analysis of relative mRNA of A2ar with different treatments. (C) Immunostaining of A2AR expression in Raw 264.7 cells with different treatments. (D) Flow cytometry analysis of A2AR + cells in Raw 264.7 cells with different treatments and the percentage of A2AR + cells in Raw 264.7 cells with different treatments. (E) qRT-PCR analysis of relative mRNA expression of Pdl1 without LPS treatment. (F) qRT-PCR analysis of relative mRNA expression of Ido1 without LPS treatment. (G) qRT-PCR analysis of relative mRNA expression of Pdl1 with LPS treatment. (H) qRT-PCR analysis of relative mRNA expression of Ido1 with LPS treatments. (I) Western blotting analysis of A2AR protein level in macrophages after 24 h of different treatment with or without A2AR inhibitor. (J) Quantitative analysis of A2AR protein level in different treatments with or without A2AR inhibitor. (K) Flow cytometry analysis of CD11b and CD39 in Raw 264.7 cells with different treatments and the percentage of CD11b + CD39 + macrophages. (L) Flow cytometry analysis of CD11b and CD73 in Raw 264.7 cells with different treatments and the percentage of CD11b + CD73 + macrophages. (M) Flow cytometry analysis of CD11b and PD-L1 in Raw 264.7 cells after 24 h of different treatments and the percentage of CD11b + PD-L1 + macrophages in Raw 264.7 cells after 24 h of different treatments. Data are presented as mean ± SD, n = 3. Statistical significance was determined using one-way ANOVA, followed by Dunnett's post hoc test for comparisons between groups.
Techniques Used: Fluorescence, Quantitative RT-PCR, Immunostaining, Expressing, Flow Cytometry, Western Blot
