Review



atcc 56275  (ATCC)


Bioz Verified Symbol ATCC is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol ATCC manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 92

    Structured Review

    ATCC atcc 56275
    Atcc 56275, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 3 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/atcc 56275/product/ATCC
    Average 92 stars, based on 3 article reviews
    atcc 56275 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    92/100 stars

    Images



    Similar Products

    92
    ATCC atcc 56275
    Atcc 56275, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/atcc 56275/product/ATCC
    Average 92 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    atcc 56275 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    92/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    91
    Novus Biologicals rabbit polyclonal antihuman ccl19
    Identification of genes differentially regulated by LPS in M-MØ and GM-MØ. a Experimental design. b Normalized fluorescence intensity of the indicated cytokine mRNA in untreated and LPS-treated M-MØ and GM-MØ. c Scatter plot of microarray results, showing the LPS-induced gene expression changes in M-MØ (log2 M-MØ + LPS/M-MØ, adj p < 0.05, x-axis) plotted against the difference in the LPS-induced gene expression changes in M-MØ and GM-MØ (log2FC [M-MØ + LPS/M-MØ] − log2FC [GM-MØ + LPS/GM-MØ]) (y-axis). The relative position of some informative genes is indicated. d GSEA on the ranked list of genes obtained from the comparison of the transcriptome of M-MØ + LPS versus GM-MØ + LPS using Gene set 1 genes. The identity of the genes within the leading edge is shown. e Identification of the gene sets including genes with the highest differential LPS responsiveness in M-MØ (Gene set 1) and GM-MØ (Gene set 2). The number of genes in each gene set and associated gene ontology terms (Enrichr) are indicated. f Expression of selected members of Gene set 1 in untreated and LPS-treated M-MØ and GM-MØ (left panel), untreated and HMGB1-treated M-MØ and GM-MØ (middle panel), and untreated and PAM3CSK4-treated M-MØ (right panel), as determined by qRT-PCR on 4 independent samples. Results are indicated as the mRNA levels of each gene in activated cells relative to the level of the same mRNA in untreated cells (n = 3–4; *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.005; ***, p < 0.0005). g SOCS2 protein levels in GM-MØ and M-MØ stimulated with LPS for the indicated times, as determined by Western blot. Shown is 1 representative experiment (n = 2). hCCL19 mRNA and <t>CCL19</t> protein levels in untreated (−) and LPS-treated M-MØ and GM-MØ. Shown are the means and SD of 5 independent experiments (n = 5; *, p < 0.05). i Expression of the indicated Gene set 1 genes in M-MØ stimulated with LPS (4 h) in the presence of U0126, BIRB0796, or BIRB0796 and U0126. Results indicate the expression of each gene relative to its expression in LPS-stimulated M-MØ. Shown are the means and SD of 3–4 independent experiments (n = 3–4; *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.005). LPS, lipopolysaccharide; GSEA, gene set enrichment analysis; M-MØ, monocyte-derived human macrophages.
    Rabbit Polyclonal Antihuman Ccl19, supplied by Novus Biologicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 91/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/rabbit polyclonal antihuman ccl19/product/Novus Biologicals
    Average 91 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    rabbit polyclonal antihuman ccl19 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    91/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    92
    Santa Cruz Biotechnology anti cdc7 spm171
    Identification of genes differentially regulated by LPS in M-MØ and GM-MØ. a Experimental design. b Normalized fluorescence intensity of the indicated cytokine mRNA in untreated and LPS-treated M-MØ and GM-MØ. c Scatter plot of microarray results, showing the LPS-induced gene expression changes in M-MØ (log2 M-MØ + LPS/M-MØ, adj p < 0.05, x-axis) plotted against the difference in the LPS-induced gene expression changes in M-MØ and GM-MØ (log2FC [M-MØ + LPS/M-MØ] − log2FC [GM-MØ + LPS/GM-MØ]) (y-axis). The relative position of some informative genes is indicated. d GSEA on the ranked list of genes obtained from the comparison of the transcriptome of M-MØ + LPS versus GM-MØ + LPS using Gene set 1 genes. The identity of the genes within the leading edge is shown. e Identification of the gene sets including genes with the highest differential LPS responsiveness in M-MØ (Gene set 1) and GM-MØ (Gene set 2). The number of genes in each gene set and associated gene ontology terms (Enrichr) are indicated. f Expression of selected members of Gene set 1 in untreated and LPS-treated M-MØ and GM-MØ (left panel), untreated and HMGB1-treated M-MØ and GM-MØ (middle panel), and untreated and PAM3CSK4-treated M-MØ (right panel), as determined by qRT-PCR on 4 independent samples. Results are indicated as the mRNA levels of each gene in activated cells relative to the level of the same mRNA in untreated cells (n = 3–4; *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.005; ***, p < 0.0005). g SOCS2 protein levels in GM-MØ and M-MØ stimulated with LPS for the indicated times, as determined by Western blot. Shown is 1 representative experiment (n = 2). hCCL19 mRNA and <t>CCL19</t> protein levels in untreated (−) and LPS-treated M-MØ and GM-MØ. Shown are the means and SD of 5 independent experiments (n = 5; *, p < 0.05). i Expression of the indicated Gene set 1 genes in M-MØ stimulated with LPS (4 h) in the presence of U0126, BIRB0796, or BIRB0796 and U0126. Results indicate the expression of each gene relative to its expression in LPS-stimulated M-MØ. Shown are the means and SD of 3–4 independent experiments (n = 3–4; *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.005). LPS, lipopolysaccharide; GSEA, gene set enrichment analysis; M-MØ, monocyte-derived human macrophages.
    Anti Cdc7 Spm171, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/anti cdc7 spm171/product/Santa Cruz Biotechnology
    Average 92 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti cdc7 spm171 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    92/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    92
    Santa Cruz Biotechnology cdc7
    Figure 3. Silencing KRCC1 results in delayed S-phase progression and accumulation of cells at the late S phase. Asynchronous HeLa and U2OS cells transfected with control or KRCC1 siRNA and labeled with 20 M EdU for 15 min. DNA synthesis, DNA content and cell cycle distribution were assessed by flow cytometry. (A) Experimental images of the EdU/PI distribution of control and KRCC1 silenced cells. (B) Percentage of cells at the late S– G2 boundary was calculated as a fraction of % EdU-positive cells in the small gate over % total EdU-positive cells. (C) HeLa cells transfected with control or KRCC1 siRNA or treated with CHK1i (AZD7762) or <t>CDC7</t> inhibitor (CDC7i, TAK-931) were labeled with EdU and subjected to flow cytometry. (D) HeLa cells transfected with control or KRCC1 siRNA or treated with CDC7i (TAK-931) were G1–S synchronized by double thymidine block and released for 12 h. The cells were collected at the indicated time points and analyzed by flow cytometry. (E) Immunoblotting of indicated proteins in control, KRCC1 depleted, CHK1 inhibited or CDC7 inhibited cells. SE and LE blots for pMCM2-S40/41 are shown.
    Cdc7, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/cdc7/product/Santa Cruz Biotechnology
    Average 92 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    cdc7 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    92/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    92
    Santa Cruz Biotechnology cdc25a sc7389
    Figure 1. KRCC1 promotes CHK1 activation and efficient checkpoint. (A, B) OV90 and U2OS cells were transfected with control siRNA (siCTL) or siRNA targeting KRCC1 (siKRCC1) for 72 h. Cells were stained with DAPI and anti-RPA2 antibody and visualized by fluorescence microscopy (scale bar, 20 m). Percentage of cells with >10 foci is quantitated. The data are from manual scoring of ∼200 cells per condition and from three experiments ± SDs. (C) Lysates from above transfected siCTL and siKRCC1 OV90 and U2OS cells were analyzed by immunoblotting for CHK1-mediated DDR markers. (D) Immunoblotting for CHK1-mediated DDR markers after 72 h KRCC1 silencing in the presence or absence of CPT (1 M for 1 h). (E) KRCC1 interaction with CHK1 and 14-3-3 was evaluated using co-immunoprecipitation in EV or HA-tagged KRCC1 (HA-KRCC1) overexpressed cells treated with or without CPT (3 M, 2 h). (F) CHK1 interaction with KRCC1 was evaluated using co-immunoprecipitation in EV or Halo-tagged KRCC1 (Halo-KRCC1) overexpressed cells treated with CPT (3 M, 2 h) in the presence or absence of ATR inhibitor (ATRi, 5 M, 4 h) and quantification of immunoprecipitated Halo-KRCC1 by densitometry analysis using NIH ImageJ and normalized to their respective CHK1 levels and compared to CPT treatment only, which was set to 1. Experiments were repeated three times. Data represent mean ± SD. Marker (M) and IgG lanes are shown. (G) OV90 cells transfected with EV or HA-KRCC1 were treated with CPT (1 M for 1 h) and released for up to 180 min. Cells were collected at the indicated time points and processed for immunoblotting. The black right-pointing triangle indicates KRCC1. Short exposure (SE) and long exposure (LE) blots for KRCC1 are shown. The right panel depicts quantification of pCHK1-S296 by densitometry analysis using NIH ImageJ, normalized to their respective CHK1 levels and compared to the no treatment control group (NT), which was set to 1. (H) Proposed model of CHK1 activation. Following DNA damage and ATR-mediated phosphorylation of CHK1 at S345, CHK1 associates directly or indirectly with KRCC1 and 14-3-3. We posit that this association induces a conformational change in CHK1 to favor autophosphorylation at S296 and enhance kinase activity toward <t>CDC25A.</t>
    Cdc25a Sc7389, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/cdc25a sc7389/product/Santa Cruz Biotechnology
    Average 92 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    cdc25a sc7389 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    92/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    92
    Santa Cruz Biotechnology anti cdc7
    Figure 1. KRCC1 promotes CHK1 activation and efficient checkpoint. (A, B) OV90 and U2OS cells were transfected with control siRNA (siCTL) or siRNA targeting KRCC1 (siKRCC1) for 72 h. Cells were stained with DAPI and anti-RPA2 antibody and visualized by fluorescence microscopy (scale bar, 20 m). Percentage of cells with >10 foci is quantitated. The data are from manual scoring of ∼200 cells per condition and from three experiments ± SDs. (C) Lysates from above transfected siCTL and siKRCC1 OV90 and U2OS cells were analyzed by immunoblotting for CHK1-mediated DDR markers. (D) Immunoblotting for CHK1-mediated DDR markers after 72 h KRCC1 silencing in the presence or absence of CPT (1 M for 1 h). (E) KRCC1 interaction with CHK1 and 14-3-3 was evaluated using co-immunoprecipitation in EV or HA-tagged KRCC1 (HA-KRCC1) overexpressed cells treated with or without CPT (3 M, 2 h). (F) CHK1 interaction with KRCC1 was evaluated using co-immunoprecipitation in EV or Halo-tagged KRCC1 (Halo-KRCC1) overexpressed cells treated with CPT (3 M, 2 h) in the presence or absence of ATR inhibitor (ATRi, 5 M, 4 h) and quantification of immunoprecipitated Halo-KRCC1 by densitometry analysis using NIH ImageJ and normalized to their respective CHK1 levels and compared to CPT treatment only, which was set to 1. Experiments were repeated three times. Data represent mean ± SD. Marker (M) and IgG lanes are shown. (G) OV90 cells transfected with EV or HA-KRCC1 were treated with CPT (1 M for 1 h) and released for up to 180 min. Cells were collected at the indicated time points and processed for immunoblotting. The black right-pointing triangle indicates KRCC1. Short exposure (SE) and long exposure (LE) blots for KRCC1 are shown. The right panel depicts quantification of pCHK1-S296 by densitometry analysis using NIH ImageJ, normalized to their respective CHK1 levels and compared to the no treatment control group (NT), which was set to 1. (H) Proposed model of CHK1 activation. Following DNA damage and ATR-mediated phosphorylation of CHK1 at S345, CHK1 associates directly or indirectly with KRCC1 and 14-3-3. We posit that this association induces a conformational change in CHK1 to favor autophosphorylation at S296 and enhance kinase activity toward <t>CDC25A.</t>
    Anti Cdc7, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/anti cdc7/product/Santa Cruz Biotechnology
    Average 92 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti cdc7 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    92/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Identification of genes differentially regulated by LPS in M-MØ and GM-MØ. a Experimental design. b Normalized fluorescence intensity of the indicated cytokine mRNA in untreated and LPS-treated M-MØ and GM-MØ. c Scatter plot of microarray results, showing the LPS-induced gene expression changes in M-MØ (log2 M-MØ + LPS/M-MØ, adj p < 0.05, x-axis) plotted against the difference in the LPS-induced gene expression changes in M-MØ and GM-MØ (log2FC [M-MØ + LPS/M-MØ] − log2FC [GM-MØ + LPS/GM-MØ]) (y-axis). The relative position of some informative genes is indicated. d GSEA on the ranked list of genes obtained from the comparison of the transcriptome of M-MØ + LPS versus GM-MØ + LPS using Gene set 1 genes. The identity of the genes within the leading edge is shown. e Identification of the gene sets including genes with the highest differential LPS responsiveness in M-MØ (Gene set 1) and GM-MØ (Gene set 2). The number of genes in each gene set and associated gene ontology terms (Enrichr) are indicated. f Expression of selected members of Gene set 1 in untreated and LPS-treated M-MØ and GM-MØ (left panel), untreated and HMGB1-treated M-MØ and GM-MØ (middle panel), and untreated and PAM3CSK4-treated M-MØ (right panel), as determined by qRT-PCR on 4 independent samples. Results are indicated as the mRNA levels of each gene in activated cells relative to the level of the same mRNA in untreated cells (n = 3–4; *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.005; ***, p < 0.0005). g SOCS2 protein levels in GM-MØ and M-MØ stimulated with LPS for the indicated times, as determined by Western blot. Shown is 1 representative experiment (n = 2). hCCL19 mRNA and CCL19 protein levels in untreated (−) and LPS-treated M-MØ and GM-MØ. Shown are the means and SD of 5 independent experiments (n = 5; *, p < 0.05). i Expression of the indicated Gene set 1 genes in M-MØ stimulated with LPS (4 h) in the presence of U0126, BIRB0796, or BIRB0796 and U0126. Results indicate the expression of each gene relative to its expression in LPS-stimulated M-MØ. Shown are the means and SD of 3–4 independent experiments (n = 3–4; *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.005). LPS, lipopolysaccharide; GSEA, gene set enrichment analysis; M-MØ, monocyte-derived human macrophages.

    Journal: Journal of Innate Immunity

    Article Title: The Gene Signature of Activated M-CSF-Primed Human Monocyte-Derived Macrophages Is IL-10-Dependent

    doi: 10.1159/000519305

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Identification of genes differentially regulated by LPS in M-MØ and GM-MØ. a Experimental design. b Normalized fluorescence intensity of the indicated cytokine mRNA in untreated and LPS-treated M-MØ and GM-MØ. c Scatter plot of microarray results, showing the LPS-induced gene expression changes in M-MØ (log2 M-MØ + LPS/M-MØ, adj p < 0.05, x-axis) plotted against the difference in the LPS-induced gene expression changes in M-MØ and GM-MØ (log2FC [M-MØ + LPS/M-MØ] − log2FC [GM-MØ + LPS/GM-MØ]) (y-axis). The relative position of some informative genes is indicated. d GSEA on the ranked list of genes obtained from the comparison of the transcriptome of M-MØ + LPS versus GM-MØ + LPS using Gene set 1 genes. The identity of the genes within the leading edge is shown. e Identification of the gene sets including genes with the highest differential LPS responsiveness in M-MØ (Gene set 1) and GM-MØ (Gene set 2). The number of genes in each gene set and associated gene ontology terms (Enrichr) are indicated. f Expression of selected members of Gene set 1 in untreated and LPS-treated M-MØ and GM-MØ (left panel), untreated and HMGB1-treated M-MØ and GM-MØ (middle panel), and untreated and PAM3CSK4-treated M-MØ (right panel), as determined by qRT-PCR on 4 independent samples. Results are indicated as the mRNA levels of each gene in activated cells relative to the level of the same mRNA in untreated cells (n = 3–4; *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.005; ***, p < 0.0005). g SOCS2 protein levels in GM-MØ and M-MØ stimulated with LPS for the indicated times, as determined by Western blot. Shown is 1 representative experiment (n = 2). hCCL19 mRNA and CCL19 protein levels in untreated (−) and LPS-treated M-MØ and GM-MØ. Shown are the means and SD of 5 independent experiments (n = 5; *, p < 0.05). i Expression of the indicated Gene set 1 genes in M-MØ stimulated with LPS (4 h) in the presence of U0126, BIRB0796, or BIRB0796 and U0126. Results indicate the expression of each gene relative to its expression in LPS-stimulated M-MØ. Shown are the means and SD of 3–4 independent experiments (n = 3–4; *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.005). LPS, lipopolysaccharide; GSEA, gene set enrichment analysis; M-MØ, monocyte-derived human macrophages.

    Article Snippet: After deparaffinization, rehydration, and antigen-retrieval using the automated PT Link system (Dako, Agilent Technologies), tissue microarray slides were incubated with a mixture of a mouse monoclonal antihuman CD163 (NB110-59935; Novus Biologicals) and a rabbit polyclonal antihuman CCL19 (NBP2-56275; Novus Biologicals) overnight at 4°C.

    Techniques: Fluorescence, Microarray, Gene Expression, Comparison, Expressing, Quantitative RT-PCR, Western Blot, Derivative Assay

    Figure 3. Silencing KRCC1 results in delayed S-phase progression and accumulation of cells at the late S phase. Asynchronous HeLa and U2OS cells transfected with control or KRCC1 siRNA and labeled with 20 M EdU for 15 min. DNA synthesis, DNA content and cell cycle distribution were assessed by flow cytometry. (A) Experimental images of the EdU/PI distribution of control and KRCC1 silenced cells. (B) Percentage of cells at the late S– G2 boundary was calculated as a fraction of % EdU-positive cells in the small gate over % total EdU-positive cells. (C) HeLa cells transfected with control or KRCC1 siRNA or treated with CHK1i (AZD7762) or CDC7 inhibitor (CDC7i, TAK-931) were labeled with EdU and subjected to flow cytometry. (D) HeLa cells transfected with control or KRCC1 siRNA or treated with CDC7i (TAK-931) were G1–S synchronized by double thymidine block and released for 12 h. The cells were collected at the indicated time points and analyzed by flow cytometry. (E) Immunoblotting of indicated proteins in control, KRCC1 depleted, CHK1 inhibited or CDC7 inhibited cells. SE and LE blots for pMCM2-S40/41 are shown.

    Journal: Nucleic acids research

    Article Title: KRCC1, a modulator of the DNA damage response.

    doi: 10.1093/nar/gkac890

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 3. Silencing KRCC1 results in delayed S-phase progression and accumulation of cells at the late S phase. Asynchronous HeLa and U2OS cells transfected with control or KRCC1 siRNA and labeled with 20 M EdU for 15 min. DNA synthesis, DNA content and cell cycle distribution were assessed by flow cytometry. (A) Experimental images of the EdU/PI distribution of control and KRCC1 silenced cells. (B) Percentage of cells at the late S– G2 boundary was calculated as a fraction of % EdU-positive cells in the small gate over % total EdU-positive cells. (C) HeLa cells transfected with control or KRCC1 siRNA or treated with CHK1i (AZD7762) or CDC7 inhibitor (CDC7i, TAK-931) were labeled with EdU and subjected to flow cytometry. (D) HeLa cells transfected with control or KRCC1 siRNA or treated with CDC7i (TAK-931) were G1–S synchronized by double thymidine block and released for 12 h. The cells were collected at the indicated time points and analyzed by flow cytometry. (E) Immunoblotting of indicated proteins in control, KRCC1 depleted, CHK1 inhibited or CDC7 inhibited cells. SE and LE blots for pMCM2-S40/41 are shown.

    Article Snippet: The following primary antibodies were used: pCHK1-S345 (2348), pCHK1S296 (2349), H2AX (2577), CHK1 (2360), HA-tag (3724), pH3-S10 (3377) and pan 14-3-3 (8312) from Cell Signaling Technology (Danvers, MA, USA); KRCC1 (16916-1- AP) from Proteintech (Rosemont, IL, USA); CDC25A (sc7389) and CDC7 (sc-56275) from Santa Cruz Biotechnol- ogy (Dallas, TX, USA); pRPA-S33 (A300-246A), AND1 (A301-141A), PSF3 (A304-124A), CHK1 (A300-298A) and pMCM2-S40/41 (A300-788A) from Bethyl Laboratories (Montgomery, TX, USA); DBF4 (ab124707) and pCyclinB1-S126 (ab55184) from Abcam; anti-Halo-tag (G921A) from Promega; RPA32 (MABE285) from EMD Millipore; RAD51 (NB100-148) from Novus Biological; 53BP1 (88439) from Cell Signaling Technology; and - tubulin and -actin from Sigma–Aldrich.

    Techniques: Transfection, Control, Labeling, DNA Synthesis, Flow Cytometry, Blocking Assay, Western Blot

    Figure 5. Model of the role of KRCC1 in genome maintenance. Following replication stress and DNA damage, ATR phosphorylates CHK1 at S345. KRCC1 then associates directly or indirectly with CHK1 and 14-3-3 to promote autophosphorylation of CHK1 at S296 and facilitate kinase activity toward CDC25A. CDC25A is then targeted for proteasomal degradation to induce a CHK1-mediated checkpoint. Failure to fully activate CHK1 may result in reduced HRR. We speculate that the KRCC1–CDC7 axis may promote CDC7-mediated events and overall replication integrity, disruption of which leads to replication stress. Overall, replication defects and failure to fully activate checkpoint may result in premature mitotic entry and subsequent apoptosis.

    Journal: Nucleic acids research

    Article Title: KRCC1, a modulator of the DNA damage response.

    doi: 10.1093/nar/gkac890

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 5. Model of the role of KRCC1 in genome maintenance. Following replication stress and DNA damage, ATR phosphorylates CHK1 at S345. KRCC1 then associates directly or indirectly with CHK1 and 14-3-3 to promote autophosphorylation of CHK1 at S296 and facilitate kinase activity toward CDC25A. CDC25A is then targeted for proteasomal degradation to induce a CHK1-mediated checkpoint. Failure to fully activate CHK1 may result in reduced HRR. We speculate that the KRCC1–CDC7 axis may promote CDC7-mediated events and overall replication integrity, disruption of which leads to replication stress. Overall, replication defects and failure to fully activate checkpoint may result in premature mitotic entry and subsequent apoptosis.

    Article Snippet: The following primary antibodies were used: pCHK1-S345 (2348), pCHK1S296 (2349), H2AX (2577), CHK1 (2360), HA-tag (3724), pH3-S10 (3377) and pan 14-3-3 (8312) from Cell Signaling Technology (Danvers, MA, USA); KRCC1 (16916-1- AP) from Proteintech (Rosemont, IL, USA); CDC25A (sc7389) and CDC7 (sc-56275) from Santa Cruz Biotechnol- ogy (Dallas, TX, USA); pRPA-S33 (A300-246A), AND1 (A301-141A), PSF3 (A304-124A), CHK1 (A300-298A) and pMCM2-S40/41 (A300-788A) from Bethyl Laboratories (Montgomery, TX, USA); DBF4 (ab124707) and pCyclinB1-S126 (ab55184) from Abcam; anti-Halo-tag (G921A) from Promega; RPA32 (MABE285) from EMD Millipore; RAD51 (NB100-148) from Novus Biological; 53BP1 (88439) from Cell Signaling Technology; and - tubulin and -actin from Sigma–Aldrich.

    Techniques: Activity Assay, Disruption

    Figure 1. KRCC1 promotes CHK1 activation and efficient checkpoint. (A, B) OV90 and U2OS cells were transfected with control siRNA (siCTL) or siRNA targeting KRCC1 (siKRCC1) for 72 h. Cells were stained with DAPI and anti-RPA2 antibody and visualized by fluorescence microscopy (scale bar, 20 m). Percentage of cells with >10 foci is quantitated. The data are from manual scoring of ∼200 cells per condition and from three experiments ± SDs. (C) Lysates from above transfected siCTL and siKRCC1 OV90 and U2OS cells were analyzed by immunoblotting for CHK1-mediated DDR markers. (D) Immunoblotting for CHK1-mediated DDR markers after 72 h KRCC1 silencing in the presence or absence of CPT (1 M for 1 h). (E) KRCC1 interaction with CHK1 and 14-3-3 was evaluated using co-immunoprecipitation in EV or HA-tagged KRCC1 (HA-KRCC1) overexpressed cells treated with or without CPT (3 M, 2 h). (F) CHK1 interaction with KRCC1 was evaluated using co-immunoprecipitation in EV or Halo-tagged KRCC1 (Halo-KRCC1) overexpressed cells treated with CPT (3 M, 2 h) in the presence or absence of ATR inhibitor (ATRi, 5 M, 4 h) and quantification of immunoprecipitated Halo-KRCC1 by densitometry analysis using NIH ImageJ and normalized to their respective CHK1 levels and compared to CPT treatment only, which was set to 1. Experiments were repeated three times. Data represent mean ± SD. Marker (M) and IgG lanes are shown. (G) OV90 cells transfected with EV or HA-KRCC1 were treated with CPT (1 M for 1 h) and released for up to 180 min. Cells were collected at the indicated time points and processed for immunoblotting. The black right-pointing triangle indicates KRCC1. Short exposure (SE) and long exposure (LE) blots for KRCC1 are shown. The right panel depicts quantification of pCHK1-S296 by densitometry analysis using NIH ImageJ, normalized to their respective CHK1 levels and compared to the no treatment control group (NT), which was set to 1. (H) Proposed model of CHK1 activation. Following DNA damage and ATR-mediated phosphorylation of CHK1 at S345, CHK1 associates directly or indirectly with KRCC1 and 14-3-3. We posit that this association induces a conformational change in CHK1 to favor autophosphorylation at S296 and enhance kinase activity toward CDC25A.

    Journal: Nucleic acids research

    Article Title: KRCC1, a modulator of the DNA damage response.

    doi: 10.1093/nar/gkac890

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 1. KRCC1 promotes CHK1 activation and efficient checkpoint. (A, B) OV90 and U2OS cells were transfected with control siRNA (siCTL) or siRNA targeting KRCC1 (siKRCC1) for 72 h. Cells were stained with DAPI and anti-RPA2 antibody and visualized by fluorescence microscopy (scale bar, 20 m). Percentage of cells with >10 foci is quantitated. The data are from manual scoring of ∼200 cells per condition and from three experiments ± SDs. (C) Lysates from above transfected siCTL and siKRCC1 OV90 and U2OS cells were analyzed by immunoblotting for CHK1-mediated DDR markers. (D) Immunoblotting for CHK1-mediated DDR markers after 72 h KRCC1 silencing in the presence or absence of CPT (1 M for 1 h). (E) KRCC1 interaction with CHK1 and 14-3-3 was evaluated using co-immunoprecipitation in EV or HA-tagged KRCC1 (HA-KRCC1) overexpressed cells treated with or without CPT (3 M, 2 h). (F) CHK1 interaction with KRCC1 was evaluated using co-immunoprecipitation in EV or Halo-tagged KRCC1 (Halo-KRCC1) overexpressed cells treated with CPT (3 M, 2 h) in the presence or absence of ATR inhibitor (ATRi, 5 M, 4 h) and quantification of immunoprecipitated Halo-KRCC1 by densitometry analysis using NIH ImageJ and normalized to their respective CHK1 levels and compared to CPT treatment only, which was set to 1. Experiments were repeated three times. Data represent mean ± SD. Marker (M) and IgG lanes are shown. (G) OV90 cells transfected with EV or HA-KRCC1 were treated with CPT (1 M for 1 h) and released for up to 180 min. Cells were collected at the indicated time points and processed for immunoblotting. The black right-pointing triangle indicates KRCC1. Short exposure (SE) and long exposure (LE) blots for KRCC1 are shown. The right panel depicts quantification of pCHK1-S296 by densitometry analysis using NIH ImageJ, normalized to their respective CHK1 levels and compared to the no treatment control group (NT), which was set to 1. (H) Proposed model of CHK1 activation. Following DNA damage and ATR-mediated phosphorylation of CHK1 at S345, CHK1 associates directly or indirectly with KRCC1 and 14-3-3. We posit that this association induces a conformational change in CHK1 to favor autophosphorylation at S296 and enhance kinase activity toward CDC25A.

    Article Snippet: The following primary antibodies were used: pCHK1-S345 (2348), pCHK1S296 (2349), H2AX (2577), CHK1 (2360), HA-tag (3724), pH3-S10 (3377) and pan 14-3-3 (8312) from Cell Signaling Technology (Danvers, MA, USA); KRCC1 (16916-1- AP) from Proteintech (Rosemont, IL, USA); CDC25A (sc7389) and CDC7 (sc-56275) from Santa Cruz Biotechnol- ogy (Dallas, TX, USA); pRPA-S33 (A300-246A), AND1 (A301-141A), PSF3 (A304-124A), CHK1 (A300-298A) and pMCM2-S40/41 (A300-788A) from Bethyl Laboratories (Montgomery, TX, USA); DBF4 (ab124707) and pCyclinB1-S126 (ab55184) from Abcam; anti-Halo-tag (G921A) from Promega; RPA32 (MABE285) from EMD Millipore; RAD51 (NB100-148) from Novus Biological; 53BP1 (88439) from Cell Signaling Technology; and - tubulin and -actin from Sigma–Aldrich.

    Techniques: Activation Assay, Transfection, Control, Staining, Fluorescence, Microscopy, Western Blot, Immunoprecipitation, Marker, Phospho-proteomics, Activity Assay

    Figure 5. Model of the role of KRCC1 in genome maintenance. Following replication stress and DNA damage, ATR phosphorylates CHK1 at S345. KRCC1 then associates directly or indirectly with CHK1 and 14-3-3 to promote autophosphorylation of CHK1 at S296 and facilitate kinase activity toward CDC25A. CDC25A is then targeted for proteasomal degradation to induce a CHK1-mediated checkpoint. Failure to fully activate CHK1 may result in reduced HRR. We speculate that the KRCC1–CDC7 axis may promote CDC7-mediated events and overall replication integrity, disruption of which leads to replication stress. Overall, replication defects and failure to fully activate checkpoint may result in premature mitotic entry and subsequent apoptosis.

    Journal: Nucleic acids research

    Article Title: KRCC1, a modulator of the DNA damage response.

    doi: 10.1093/nar/gkac890

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 5. Model of the role of KRCC1 in genome maintenance. Following replication stress and DNA damage, ATR phosphorylates CHK1 at S345. KRCC1 then associates directly or indirectly with CHK1 and 14-3-3 to promote autophosphorylation of CHK1 at S296 and facilitate kinase activity toward CDC25A. CDC25A is then targeted for proteasomal degradation to induce a CHK1-mediated checkpoint. Failure to fully activate CHK1 may result in reduced HRR. We speculate that the KRCC1–CDC7 axis may promote CDC7-mediated events and overall replication integrity, disruption of which leads to replication stress. Overall, replication defects and failure to fully activate checkpoint may result in premature mitotic entry and subsequent apoptosis.

    Article Snippet: The following primary antibodies were used: pCHK1-S345 (2348), pCHK1S296 (2349), H2AX (2577), CHK1 (2360), HA-tag (3724), pH3-S10 (3377) and pan 14-3-3 (8312) from Cell Signaling Technology (Danvers, MA, USA); KRCC1 (16916-1- AP) from Proteintech (Rosemont, IL, USA); CDC25A (sc7389) and CDC7 (sc-56275) from Santa Cruz Biotechnol- ogy (Dallas, TX, USA); pRPA-S33 (A300-246A), AND1 (A301-141A), PSF3 (A304-124A), CHK1 (A300-298A) and pMCM2-S40/41 (A300-788A) from Bethyl Laboratories (Montgomery, TX, USA); DBF4 (ab124707) and pCyclinB1-S126 (ab55184) from Abcam; anti-Halo-tag (G921A) from Promega; RPA32 (MABE285) from EMD Millipore; RAD51 (NB100-148) from Novus Biological; 53BP1 (88439) from Cell Signaling Technology; and - tubulin and -actin from Sigma–Aldrich.

    Techniques: Activity Assay, Disruption