Review



boxplot matlab presentation  (MathWorks Inc)


Bioz Verified Symbol MathWorks Inc is a verified supplier  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 90

    Structured Review

    MathWorks Inc boxplot matlab presentation
    Boxplot Matlab Presentation, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/matlab+boxplot/pmc10520357-188-0-19
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    boxplot matlab presentation - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    90/100 stars

    Images

    Related Articles

    Comparison:

    Article Title: Endometrial cancer tissue features clusterization by kurtosis MRI
    Article Snippet: The Kruskal–Wallis test (Non‐parametric Analysis of variance) with Dunn and Sidak's correction (Matlab 2021a) and Cohen's d effective size were performed to evaluate the significant differences between the average parameters obtained in the three areas (T, PT, H).

    Article Title: Assessment of metabolites in urine in post-kidney transplant patients: insights into allograft function and creatinine clearance
    Article Snippet: The null hypothesis of equality of population medians among groups was tested using the nonparametric Kruskal–Wallis test, with Dunn’s post hoc test for pairwise comparison (Matlab, v 2015b).

    Article Title: A left-lateralized dorsolateral prefrontal network for naming.
    Article Snippet: For each cluster, Kruskal-Wallis test (kruskalwallis function, MATLAB) was used to determine whether data in each task comes from the same distribution.

    Article Title: Refuting a Temporal Correlation: Interictal Epileptic Discharges Do Not Preferentially Occur During Respiratory Events in Patients With Sleep-Related Breathing Disorder and Epilepsy.
    Article Snippet: When comparing IED density between sleep stages (5 conditions), we used a Kruskal–Wallis test; then, in case of significant difference (p < 0.05), a post hoc pairwise comparison was performed using a Mann–Whitney U- test with Tukey's significant difference criterion (built- in Matlab functions ‘kruskalwallis’ and ‘multcompare’).

    Article Title: Cell types implement multiple coding schemes in distinct prefrontal cortex areas during goal-directed behavior.
    Article Snippet: Single cell time selectivity and preference switching across epochs To study the choice selectivity at the single-cell level, we implemented a Kruskal-Wallis test (kruskalwallis Matlab function) performed on each time bin (intervals 200 ms, resampling 10 ms) in the analysis windows, as done previously (Cavanagh et al., 2018).

    Article Title: An auditory cortical-striatal circuit supports sound-triggered timing to predict future events
    Article Snippet: Significant correlation coefficients across animals were combined per sound-reward interval and compared across intervals using the Kruskal–Wallis test (MATLAB command: kruskalwallis), with a post-hoc Tukey-Kramer test to determine individual group differences (MATLAB command: multcompare applied on the kruskalwallis output).

    Article Title: Evaluation of (Shared) Autonomy in Robot‐Assisted Vitreoretinal Surgery Using a Surgical Model
    Article Snippet: The Kruskal‐Wallis test [ ] ( https://www.mathworks.com/help/stats/kruskalwallis.html?s ) was first conducted for all metrics, but it indicated no significant differences among the three setups.

    Article Title: An auditory cortical-striatal circuit supports sound-triggered timing to predict future events
    Article Snippet: Normalized response magnitudes were combined across animals per sound-reward interval and compared using the Kruskal–Wallis test (MATLAB command: kruskalwallis), with a post-hoc Tukey-Kramer test to determine individual group differences (MATLAB command: multcompare applied on the kruskalwallis output).

    Mann-Whitney U-Test:

    Article Title: Endometrial cancer tissue features clusterization by kurtosis MRI
    Article Snippet: The Kruskal–Wallis test (Non‐parametric Analysis of variance) with Dunn and Sidak's correction (Matlab 2021a) and Cohen's d effective size were performed to evaluate the significant differences between the average parameters obtained in the three areas (T, PT, H).

    Article Title: Assessment of metabolites in urine in post-kidney transplant patients: insights into allograft function and creatinine clearance
    Article Snippet: The null hypothesis of equality of population medians among groups was tested using the nonparametric Kruskal–Wallis test, with Dunn’s post hoc test for pairwise comparison (Matlab, v 2015b).

    Article Title: A left-lateralized dorsolateral prefrontal network for naming.
    Article Snippet: For each cluster, Kruskal-Wallis test (kruskalwallis function, MATLAB) was used to determine whether data in each task comes from the same distribution.

    Article Title: Refuting a Temporal Correlation: Interictal Epileptic Discharges Do Not Preferentially Occur During Respiratory Events in Patients With Sleep-Related Breathing Disorder and Epilepsy.
    Article Snippet: When comparing IED density between sleep stages (5 conditions), we used a Kruskal–Wallis test; then, in case of significant difference (p < 0.05), a post hoc pairwise comparison was performed using a Mann–Whitney U- test with Tukey's significant difference criterion (built- in Matlab functions ‘kruskalwallis’ and ‘multcompare’).

    Article Title: Cell types implement multiple coding schemes in distinct prefrontal cortex areas during goal-directed behavior.
    Article Snippet: Single cell time selectivity and preference switching across epochs To study the choice selectivity at the single-cell level, we implemented a Kruskal-Wallis test (kruskalwallis Matlab function) performed on each time bin (intervals 200 ms, resampling 10 ms) in the analysis windows, as done previously (Cavanagh et al., 2018).

    Article Title: An auditory cortical-striatal circuit supports sound-triggered timing to predict future events
    Article Snippet: Significant correlation coefficients across animals were combined per sound-reward interval and compared across intervals using the Kruskal–Wallis test (MATLAB command: kruskalwallis), with a post-hoc Tukey-Kramer test to determine individual group differences (MATLAB command: multcompare applied on the kruskalwallis output).

    Article Title: Evaluation of (Shared) Autonomy in Robot‐Assisted Vitreoretinal Surgery Using a Surgical Model
    Article Snippet: The Kruskal‐Wallis test [ ] ( https://www.mathworks.com/help/stats/kruskalwallis.html?s ) was first conducted for all metrics, but it indicated no significant differences among the three setups.

    Article Title: An auditory cortical-striatal circuit supports sound-triggered timing to predict future events
    Article Snippet: Normalized response magnitudes were combined across animals per sound-reward interval and compared using the Kruskal–Wallis test (MATLAB command: kruskalwallis), with a post-hoc Tukey-Kramer test to determine individual group differences (MATLAB command: multcompare applied on the kruskalwallis output).



    Similar Products

    90
    MathWorks Inc boxplot function in matlab software r2015a
    ( a ) Droplet-like DPICs were initially formed by mixing 20 μM ATTO565-labeled p53 4M ΔTAD with 0.6 μM ATTO488-labeled Random DNA and incubating for 30 minutes at room temperature. Subsequently, Cy5-labeled p21 DNA was added at varying concentrations and incubated for an additional 120 minutes: (i) 0.15 μM; (ii) 0.225 μM; (iii) 0.3 μM; (iv) 0.45 μM; (v) 0.6 μM; (vi) 0.75 μM; (vii) 0.9 μM. Representative fluorescence images at incubation time t = 4-min and t = 120-min are shown. Independent in vitro droplet experiments were repeated three times (n = 3). ( b ) <t>Boxplot</t> of characteristic time constants τ 1 and τ 2 for p21 DNA concentrations ranging from 0.3 to 0.9 μM. N indicates the number of individual biomolecule-rich condensates analyzed under each condition. In box plots, the black line denotes the median, box edges represent the 25 th and 75 th percentiles, whiskers indicate the range excluding outliers, and outliers are shown as individual dots (•). ( c ) Phase diagram showing normalized fluorescence intensities of ATTO565-labeled p53 4M ΔTAD and ATTO488-labeled Random DNA at the center of condensates under increasing concentrations of p21 DNA (0.3, 0.45, 0.6, and 0.75 μM). Values are shown both before p21 DNA addition and at the end of Stage I. Control experiments in which Random DNA was used in place of p21 DNA are also included. Error bars indicate mean ± s.d. Green dashed lines mark the estimated binodal boundary, and purple dashed lines represent the spinodal boundary, as confirmed by our phase-field model (see – ).
    Boxplot Function In Matlab Software R2015a, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/matlab+boxplot/bio_rxiv__2025__06__25__661497-253-3-5
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    boxplot function in matlab software r2015a - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    MathWorks Inc matlab function boxplot
    ( a ) Droplet-like DPICs were initially formed by mixing 20 μM ATTO565-labeled p53 4M ΔTAD with 0.6 μM ATTO488-labeled Random DNA and incubating for 30 minutes at room temperature. Subsequently, Cy5-labeled p21 DNA was added at varying concentrations and incubated for an additional 120 minutes: (i) 0.15 μM; (ii) 0.225 μM; (iii) 0.3 μM; (iv) 0.45 μM; (v) 0.6 μM; (vi) 0.75 μM; (vii) 0.9 μM. Representative fluorescence images at incubation time t = 4-min and t = 120-min are shown. Independent in vitro droplet experiments were repeated three times (n = 3). ( b ) <t>Boxplot</t> of characteristic time constants τ 1 and τ 2 for p21 DNA concentrations ranging from 0.3 to 0.9 μM. N indicates the number of individual biomolecule-rich condensates analyzed under each condition. In box plots, the black line denotes the median, box edges represent the 25 th and 75 th percentiles, whiskers indicate the range excluding outliers, and outliers are shown as individual dots (•). ( c ) Phase diagram showing normalized fluorescence intensities of ATTO565-labeled p53 4M ΔTAD and ATTO488-labeled Random DNA at the center of condensates under increasing concentrations of p21 DNA (0.3, 0.45, 0.6, and 0.75 μM). Values are shown both before p21 DNA addition and at the end of Stage I. Control experiments in which Random DNA was used in place of p21 DNA are also included. Error bars indicate mean ± s.d. Green dashed lines mark the estimated binodal boundary, and purple dashed lines represent the spinodal boundary, as confirmed by our phase-field model (see – ).
    Matlab Function Boxplot, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/matlab+boxplot/pmc11813099__pbio__3003022__s001-18-47-47
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    matlab function boxplot - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    MathWorks Inc matlab's 'boxplot' function
    ( a ) Droplet-like DPICs were initially formed by mixing 20 μM ATTO565-labeled p53 4M ΔTAD with 0.6 μM ATTO488-labeled Random DNA and incubating for 30 minutes at room temperature. Subsequently, Cy5-labeled p21 DNA was added at varying concentrations and incubated for an additional 120 minutes: (i) 0.15 μM; (ii) 0.225 μM; (iii) 0.3 μM; (iv) 0.45 μM; (v) 0.6 μM; (vi) 0.75 μM; (vii) 0.9 μM. Representative fluorescence images at incubation time t = 4-min and t = 120-min are shown. Independent in vitro droplet experiments were repeated three times (n = 3). ( b ) <t>Boxplot</t> of characteristic time constants τ 1 and τ 2 for p21 DNA concentrations ranging from 0.3 to 0.9 μM. N indicates the number of individual biomolecule-rich condensates analyzed under each condition. In box plots, the black line denotes the median, box edges represent the 25 th and 75 th percentiles, whiskers indicate the range excluding outliers, and outliers are shown as individual dots (•). ( c ) Phase diagram showing normalized fluorescence intensities of ATTO565-labeled p53 4M ΔTAD and ATTO488-labeled Random DNA at the center of condensates under increasing concentrations of p21 DNA (0.3, 0.45, 0.6, and 0.75 μM). Values are shown both before p21 DNA addition and at the end of Stage I. Control experiments in which Random DNA was used in place of p21 DNA are also included. Error bars indicate mean ± s.d. Green dashed lines mark the estimated binodal boundary, and purple dashed lines represent the spinodal boundary, as confirmed by our phase-field model (see – ).
    Matlab's 'Boxplot' Function, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/matlab+boxplot/pmc11485236-310-15-14
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    matlab's 'boxplot' function - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    MathWorks Inc boxplots generated in matlab 2021a
    ( a ) Droplet-like DPICs were initially formed by mixing 20 μM ATTO565-labeled p53 4M ΔTAD with 0.6 μM ATTO488-labeled Random DNA and incubating for 30 minutes at room temperature. Subsequently, Cy5-labeled p21 DNA was added at varying concentrations and incubated for an additional 120 minutes: (i) 0.15 μM; (ii) 0.225 μM; (iii) 0.3 μM; (iv) 0.45 μM; (v) 0.6 μM; (vi) 0.75 μM; (vii) 0.9 μM. Representative fluorescence images at incubation time t = 4-min and t = 120-min are shown. Independent in vitro droplet experiments were repeated three times (n = 3). ( b ) <t>Boxplot</t> of characteristic time constants τ 1 and τ 2 for p21 DNA concentrations ranging from 0.3 to 0.9 μM. N indicates the number of individual biomolecule-rich condensates analyzed under each condition. In box plots, the black line denotes the median, box edges represent the 25 th and 75 th percentiles, whiskers indicate the range excluding outliers, and outliers are shown as individual dots (•). ( c ) Phase diagram showing normalized fluorescence intensities of ATTO565-labeled p53 4M ΔTAD and ATTO488-labeled Random DNA at the center of condensates under increasing concentrations of p21 DNA (0.3, 0.45, 0.6, and 0.75 μM). Values are shown both before p21 DNA addition and at the end of Stage I. Control experiments in which Random DNA was used in place of p21 DNA are also included. Error bars indicate mean ± s.d. Green dashed lines mark the estimated binodal boundary, and purple dashed lines represent the spinodal boundary, as confirmed by our phase-field model (see – ).
    Boxplots Generated In Matlab 2021a, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/matlab+boxplot/pm38607921-667-5-8
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    boxplots generated in matlab 2021a - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    MathWorks Inc matlab function 'boxplot
    A Venn diagrams showing the proportion of mEC cells classified as BVCs (blue), Border Cells (red), or both cell types (overlap region), for each age group. Coloured text above circles shows corresponding numerical percentages. Circles are scaled such that the square bounding box represents 100% of cells recorded in an age group. B Neuronal firing rate maps and best-fitting BVC model maps, for example BVCs and Border Cells. Each row shows example cell, columns of paired maps show data from different age groups (cells differ across age groups). Text adjacent to the neuronal firing rate map shows peak rate (top left, Hz) and Border Score (‘BS’; top right). Model map format as for Fig. . Top three rows show cells classified as both BVCs and Border Cells, middle two rows cells classified as BVCs but not Border Cells, bottom two rows cells classified as Border Cells but not BVCs. Boxplots showing distributions of Spatial Information ( C ), inter-trial stability ( D ) and intra-trial stability ( E ), for BVCs (blue boxes) and Border cells (red boxes) in each age group. Cells classified as both BVCs and Border Cells are included in both groups. Box shows IQR, circular target shows median, whiskers show limits of data excluding outliers. F Boxplots showing distributions of the BVC r (max) of BVCs (blue boxes; left y-axis) and Border Score of Border Cells (red boxes, right y-axis). <t>Boxplot</t> format as for ( C ). G Boxplots showing distributions of d tunings for BVCs (blue bars) and Border Cells (red bars), in each age group. Boxplot format as for ( C ). H Proportion of BVCs (blue bars) and Border Cells (red bars) with Φ oriented towards walls (±12°), in each age group. Error bars show 95% confidence interval for the proportion. Horizontal dashed line shows proportion expected, assuming a circularly uniform distribution of Φ .
    Matlab Function 'Boxplot, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/matlab+boxplot/pmc10834499-348-11-5
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    matlab function 'boxplot - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    MathWorks Inc boxplot function matlab r2014a
    A Venn diagrams showing the proportion of mEC cells classified as BVCs (blue), Border Cells (red), or both cell types (overlap region), for each age group. Coloured text above circles shows corresponding numerical percentages. Circles are scaled such that the square bounding box represents 100% of cells recorded in an age group. B Neuronal firing rate maps and best-fitting BVC model maps, for example BVCs and Border Cells. Each row shows example cell, columns of paired maps show data from different age groups (cells differ across age groups). Text adjacent to the neuronal firing rate map shows peak rate (top left, Hz) and Border Score (‘BS’; top right). Model map format as for Fig. . Top three rows show cells classified as both BVCs and Border Cells, middle two rows cells classified as BVCs but not Border Cells, bottom two rows cells classified as Border Cells but not BVCs. Boxplots showing distributions of Spatial Information ( C ), inter-trial stability ( D ) and intra-trial stability ( E ), for BVCs (blue boxes) and Border cells (red boxes) in each age group. Cells classified as both BVCs and Border Cells are included in both groups. Box shows IQR, circular target shows median, whiskers show limits of data excluding outliers. F Boxplots showing distributions of the BVC r (max) of BVCs (blue boxes; left y-axis) and Border Score of Border Cells (red boxes, right y-axis). <t>Boxplot</t> format as for ( C ). G Boxplots showing distributions of d tunings for BVCs (blue bars) and Border Cells (red bars), in each age group. Boxplot format as for ( C ). H Proportion of BVCs (blue bars) and Border Cells (red bars) with Φ oriented towards walls (±12°), in each age group. Error bars show 95% confidence interval for the proportion. Horizontal dashed line shows proportion expected, assuming a circularly uniform distribution of Φ .
    Boxplot Function Matlab R2014a, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/matlab+boxplot/pmc10558457__41467_2023_41547_MOESM1_ESM-81-6-37
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    boxplot function matlab r2014a - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    MathWorks Inc boxplot matlab presentation
    A Venn diagrams showing the proportion of mEC cells classified as BVCs (blue), Border Cells (red), or both cell types (overlap region), for each age group. Coloured text above circles shows corresponding numerical percentages. Circles are scaled such that the square bounding box represents 100% of cells recorded in an age group. B Neuronal firing rate maps and best-fitting BVC model maps, for example BVCs and Border Cells. Each row shows example cell, columns of paired maps show data from different age groups (cells differ across age groups). Text adjacent to the neuronal firing rate map shows peak rate (top left, Hz) and Border Score (‘BS’; top right). Model map format as for Fig. . Top three rows show cells classified as both BVCs and Border Cells, middle two rows cells classified as BVCs but not Border Cells, bottom two rows cells classified as Border Cells but not BVCs. Boxplots showing distributions of Spatial Information ( C ), inter-trial stability ( D ) and intra-trial stability ( E ), for BVCs (blue boxes) and Border cells (red boxes) in each age group. Cells classified as both BVCs and Border Cells are included in both groups. Box shows IQR, circular target shows median, whiskers show limits of data excluding outliers. F Boxplots showing distributions of the BVC r (max) of BVCs (blue boxes; left y-axis) and Border Score of Border Cells (red boxes, right y-axis). <t>Boxplot</t> format as for ( C ). G Boxplots showing distributions of d tunings for BVCs (blue bars) and Border Cells (red bars), in each age group. Boxplot format as for ( C ). H Proportion of BVCs (blue bars) and Border Cells (red bars) with Φ oriented towards walls (±12°), in each age group. Error bars show 95% confidence interval for the proportion. Horizontal dashed line shows proportion expected, assuming a circularly uniform distribution of Φ .
    Boxplot Matlab Presentation, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/matlab+boxplot/pmc10520357-188-0-19
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    boxplot matlab presentation - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    ( a ) Droplet-like DPICs were initially formed by mixing 20 μM ATTO565-labeled p53 4M ΔTAD with 0.6 μM ATTO488-labeled Random DNA and incubating for 30 minutes at room temperature. Subsequently, Cy5-labeled p21 DNA was added at varying concentrations and incubated for an additional 120 minutes: (i) 0.15 μM; (ii) 0.225 μM; (iii) 0.3 μM; (iv) 0.45 μM; (v) 0.6 μM; (vi) 0.75 μM; (vii) 0.9 μM. Representative fluorescence images at incubation time t = 4-min and t = 120-min are shown. Independent in vitro droplet experiments were repeated three times (n = 3). ( b ) Boxplot of characteristic time constants τ 1 and τ 2 for p21 DNA concentrations ranging from 0.3 to 0.9 μM. N indicates the number of individual biomolecule-rich condensates analyzed under each condition. In box plots, the black line denotes the median, box edges represent the 25 th and 75 th percentiles, whiskers indicate the range excluding outliers, and outliers are shown as individual dots (•). ( c ) Phase diagram showing normalized fluorescence intensities of ATTO565-labeled p53 4M ΔTAD and ATTO488-labeled Random DNA at the center of condensates under increasing concentrations of p21 DNA (0.3, 0.45, 0.6, and 0.75 μM). Values are shown both before p21 DNA addition and at the end of Stage I. Control experiments in which Random DNA was used in place of p21 DNA are also included. Error bars indicate mean ± s.d. Green dashed lines mark the estimated binodal boundary, and purple dashed lines represent the spinodal boundary, as confirmed by our phase-field model (see – ).

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: Hollow condensates emerge from gelation-induced spinodal decomposition

    doi: 10.1101/2025.06.25.661497

    Figure Lengend Snippet: ( a ) Droplet-like DPICs were initially formed by mixing 20 μM ATTO565-labeled p53 4M ΔTAD with 0.6 μM ATTO488-labeled Random DNA and incubating for 30 minutes at room temperature. Subsequently, Cy5-labeled p21 DNA was added at varying concentrations and incubated for an additional 120 minutes: (i) 0.15 μM; (ii) 0.225 μM; (iii) 0.3 μM; (iv) 0.45 μM; (v) 0.6 μM; (vi) 0.75 μM; (vii) 0.9 μM. Representative fluorescence images at incubation time t = 4-min and t = 120-min are shown. Independent in vitro droplet experiments were repeated three times (n = 3). ( b ) Boxplot of characteristic time constants τ 1 and τ 2 for p21 DNA concentrations ranging from 0.3 to 0.9 μM. N indicates the number of individual biomolecule-rich condensates analyzed under each condition. In box plots, the black line denotes the median, box edges represent the 25 th and 75 th percentiles, whiskers indicate the range excluding outliers, and outliers are shown as individual dots (•). ( c ) Phase diagram showing normalized fluorescence intensities of ATTO565-labeled p53 4M ΔTAD and ATTO488-labeled Random DNA at the center of condensates under increasing concentrations of p21 DNA (0.3, 0.45, 0.6, and 0.75 μM). Values are shown both before p21 DNA addition and at the end of Stage I. Control experiments in which Random DNA was used in place of p21 DNA are also included. Error bars indicate mean ± s.d. Green dashed lines mark the estimated binodal boundary, and purple dashed lines represent the spinodal boundary, as confirmed by our phase-field model (see – ).

    Article Snippet: The function of “boxplot” in MATLAB software (R2015a, 64-bit, February 12, 2015) was used to plot the boxplots in , , and Supplementary Fig. 3.

    Techniques: Labeling, Incubation, Fluorescence, In Vitro, Control

    A Venn diagrams showing the proportion of mEC cells classified as BVCs (blue), Border Cells (red), or both cell types (overlap region), for each age group. Coloured text above circles shows corresponding numerical percentages. Circles are scaled such that the square bounding box represents 100% of cells recorded in an age group. B Neuronal firing rate maps and best-fitting BVC model maps, for example BVCs and Border Cells. Each row shows example cell, columns of paired maps show data from different age groups (cells differ across age groups). Text adjacent to the neuronal firing rate map shows peak rate (top left, Hz) and Border Score (‘BS’; top right). Model map format as for Fig. . Top three rows show cells classified as both BVCs and Border Cells, middle two rows cells classified as BVCs but not Border Cells, bottom two rows cells classified as Border Cells but not BVCs. Boxplots showing distributions of Spatial Information ( C ), inter-trial stability ( D ) and intra-trial stability ( E ), for BVCs (blue boxes) and Border cells (red boxes) in each age group. Cells classified as both BVCs and Border Cells are included in both groups. Box shows IQR, circular target shows median, whiskers show limits of data excluding outliers. F Boxplots showing distributions of the BVC r (max) of BVCs (blue boxes; left y-axis) and Border Score of Border Cells (red boxes, right y-axis). Boxplot format as for ( C ). G Boxplots showing distributions of d tunings for BVCs (blue bars) and Border Cells (red bars), in each age group. Boxplot format as for ( C ). H Proportion of BVCs (blue bars) and Border Cells (red bars) with Φ oriented towards walls (±12°), in each age group. Error bars show 95% confidence interval for the proportion. Horizontal dashed line shows proportion expected, assuming a circularly uniform distribution of Φ .

    Journal: Nature Communications

    Article Title: Environment geometry alters subiculum boundary vector cell receptive fields in adulthood and early development

    doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-45098-1

    Figure Lengend Snippet: A Venn diagrams showing the proportion of mEC cells classified as BVCs (blue), Border Cells (red), or both cell types (overlap region), for each age group. Coloured text above circles shows corresponding numerical percentages. Circles are scaled such that the square bounding box represents 100% of cells recorded in an age group. B Neuronal firing rate maps and best-fitting BVC model maps, for example BVCs and Border Cells. Each row shows example cell, columns of paired maps show data from different age groups (cells differ across age groups). Text adjacent to the neuronal firing rate map shows peak rate (top left, Hz) and Border Score (‘BS’; top right). Model map format as for Fig. . Top three rows show cells classified as both BVCs and Border Cells, middle two rows cells classified as BVCs but not Border Cells, bottom two rows cells classified as Border Cells but not BVCs. Boxplots showing distributions of Spatial Information ( C ), inter-trial stability ( D ) and intra-trial stability ( E ), for BVCs (blue boxes) and Border cells (red boxes) in each age group. Cells classified as both BVCs and Border Cells are included in both groups. Box shows IQR, circular target shows median, whiskers show limits of data excluding outliers. F Boxplots showing distributions of the BVC r (max) of BVCs (blue boxes; left y-axis) and Border Score of Border Cells (red boxes, right y-axis). Boxplot format as for ( C ). G Boxplots showing distributions of d tunings for BVCs (blue bars) and Border Cells (red bars), in each age group. Boxplot format as for ( C ). H Proportion of BVCs (blue bars) and Border Cells (red bars) with Φ oriented towards walls (±12°), in each age group. Error bars show 95% confidence interval for the proportion. Horizontal dashed line shows proportion expected, assuming a circularly uniform distribution of Φ .

    Article Snippet: Boxplots were generated using the Matlab (The MathWorks Inc, USA) function ‘boxplot’.

    Techniques: