human c4 Search Results


99
Shanghai Korain Biotech Co Ltd human aldo-keto reductase family 1 member c4
Human Aldo Keto Reductase Family 1 Member C4, supplied by Shanghai Korain Biotech Co Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/human aldo-keto reductase family 1 member c4/product/Shanghai Korain Biotech Co Ltd
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
human aldo-keto reductase family 1 member c4 - by Bioz Stars, 2025-07
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Novus Biologicals human recombinant lypd8
RT-qPCR analysis and comparison of modulation of antimicrobial factors in caput and cauda epididymidis and <t>Lypd8</t> assessment in mouse and in vitro assay. ( A ) beta-defensins, ( B ) UPEC-associated antimicrobial factors. Unpaired t test ( * ) or Mann–Whitney U test (#) for each organ, respectively, comparing sham to UPEC-infected mice ( **** P < 0.0001, *** P < 0.001, ** P < 0.01, * P < 0.05). Fold change calculated via 2 (−ddCT) method. Data presented as box-and-whisker with median and min/max. cap = caput, cau = cauda. Sham 10 days, caput n = 4, cauda n = 4; UPEC 10 days, caput n = 4, cauda n = 6. ( C ) Laser-assisted microdissection of caput epithelium and caput interstitium from wild-type epididymis, n = 2. Relative expression calculated via 2 (−dCT) method. Data presented as mean ± SD. ( D ) Bacterial adherence to MEPC5 cells under the presence (+) or absence (−) of 1 μg/ml human recombinant LYPD8 (hLYPD8). CFU/ml were calculated after incubation of agar plates at 37°C for 24 h. Summary of three independent experiments with each time n = 2–3 per group. Unpaired t test comparing the number of MEPC5-adherent UPEC in the presence or absence of LYPD8 ( **** P < 0.0001, *** P < 0.001, ** P < 0.01, * P < 0.05).
Human Recombinant Lypd8, supplied by Novus Biologicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/human recombinant lypd8/product/Novus Biologicals
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
human recombinant lypd8 - by Bioz Stars, 2025-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Assaypro complement c4
RT-qPCR analysis and comparison of modulation of antimicrobial factors in caput and cauda epididymidis and <t>Lypd8</t> assessment in mouse and in vitro assay. ( A ) beta-defensins, ( B ) UPEC-associated antimicrobial factors. Unpaired t test ( * ) or Mann–Whitney U test (#) for each organ, respectively, comparing sham to UPEC-infected mice ( **** P < 0.0001, *** P < 0.001, ** P < 0.01, * P < 0.05). Fold change calculated via 2 (−ddCT) method. Data presented as box-and-whisker with median and min/max. cap = caput, cau = cauda. Sham 10 days, caput n = 4, cauda n = 4; UPEC 10 days, caput n = 4, cauda n = 6. ( C ) Laser-assisted microdissection of caput epithelium and caput interstitium from wild-type epididymis, n = 2. Relative expression calculated via 2 (−dCT) method. Data presented as mean ± SD. ( D ) Bacterial adherence to MEPC5 cells under the presence (+) or absence (−) of 1 μg/ml human recombinant LYPD8 (hLYPD8). CFU/ml were calculated after incubation of agar plates at 37°C for 24 h. Summary of three independent experiments with each time n = 2–3 per group. Unpaired t test comparing the number of MEPC5-adherent UPEC in the presence or absence of LYPD8 ( **** P < 0.0001, *** P < 0.001, ** P < 0.01, * P < 0.05).
Complement C4, supplied by Assaypro, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/complement c4/product/Assaypro
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
complement c4 - by Bioz Stars, 2025-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

91
Cusabio human complement 4 c4 elisa kit
RT-qPCR analysis and comparison of modulation of antimicrobial factors in caput and cauda epididymidis and <t>Lypd8</t> assessment in mouse and in vitro assay. ( A ) beta-defensins, ( B ) UPEC-associated antimicrobial factors. Unpaired t test ( * ) or Mann–Whitney U test (#) for each organ, respectively, comparing sham to UPEC-infected mice ( **** P < 0.0001, *** P < 0.001, ** P < 0.01, * P < 0.05). Fold change calculated via 2 (−ddCT) method. Data presented as box-and-whisker with median and min/max. cap = caput, cau = cauda. Sham 10 days, caput n = 4, cauda n = 4; UPEC 10 days, caput n = 4, cauda n = 6. ( C ) Laser-assisted microdissection of caput epithelium and caput interstitium from wild-type epididymis, n = 2. Relative expression calculated via 2 (−dCT) method. Data presented as mean ± SD. ( D ) Bacterial adherence to MEPC5 cells under the presence (+) or absence (−) of 1 μg/ml human recombinant LYPD8 (hLYPD8). CFU/ml were calculated after incubation of agar plates at 37°C for 24 h. Summary of three independent experiments with each time n = 2–3 per group. Unpaired t test comparing the number of MEPC5-adherent UPEC in the presence or absence of LYPD8 ( **** P < 0.0001, *** P < 0.001, ** P < 0.01, * P < 0.05).
Human Complement 4 C4 Elisa Kit, supplied by Cusabio, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 91/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/human complement 4 c4 elisa kit/product/Cusabio
Average 91 stars, based on 1 article reviews
human complement 4 c4 elisa kit - by Bioz Stars, 2025-07
91/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
ATCC human prostate cancer cell lines c4 2
RT-qPCR analysis and comparison of modulation of antimicrobial factors in caput and cauda epididymidis and <t>Lypd8</t> assessment in mouse and in vitro assay. ( A ) beta-defensins, ( B ) UPEC-associated antimicrobial factors. Unpaired t test ( * ) or Mann–Whitney U test (#) for each organ, respectively, comparing sham to UPEC-infected mice ( **** P < 0.0001, *** P < 0.001, ** P < 0.01, * P < 0.05). Fold change calculated via 2 (−ddCT) method. Data presented as box-and-whisker with median and min/max. cap = caput, cau = cauda. Sham 10 days, caput n = 4, cauda n = 4; UPEC 10 days, caput n = 4, cauda n = 6. ( C ) Laser-assisted microdissection of caput epithelium and caput interstitium from wild-type epididymis, n = 2. Relative expression calculated via 2 (−dCT) method. Data presented as mean ± SD. ( D ) Bacterial adherence to MEPC5 cells under the presence (+) or absence (−) of 1 μg/ml human recombinant LYPD8 (hLYPD8). CFU/ml were calculated after incubation of agar plates at 37°C for 24 h. Summary of three independent experiments with each time n = 2–3 per group. Unpaired t test comparing the number of MEPC5-adherent UPEC in the presence or absence of LYPD8 ( **** P < 0.0001, *** P < 0.001, ** P < 0.01, * P < 0.05).
Human Prostate Cancer Cell Lines C4 2, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/human prostate cancer cell lines c4 2/product/ATCC
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
human prostate cancer cell lines c4 2 - by Bioz Stars, 2025-07
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


RT-qPCR analysis and comparison of modulation of antimicrobial factors in caput and cauda epididymidis and Lypd8 assessment in mouse and in vitro assay. ( A ) beta-defensins, ( B ) UPEC-associated antimicrobial factors. Unpaired t test ( * ) or Mann–Whitney U test (#) for each organ, respectively, comparing sham to UPEC-infected mice ( **** P < 0.0001, *** P < 0.001, ** P < 0.01, * P < 0.05). Fold change calculated via 2 (−ddCT) method. Data presented as box-and-whisker with median and min/max. cap = caput, cau = cauda. Sham 10 days, caput n = 4, cauda n = 4; UPEC 10 days, caput n = 4, cauda n = 6. ( C ) Laser-assisted microdissection of caput epithelium and caput interstitium from wild-type epididymis, n = 2. Relative expression calculated via 2 (−dCT) method. Data presented as mean ± SD. ( D ) Bacterial adherence to MEPC5 cells under the presence (+) or absence (−) of 1 μg/ml human recombinant LYPD8 (hLYPD8). CFU/ml were calculated after incubation of agar plates at 37°C for 24 h. Summary of three independent experiments with each time n = 2–3 per group. Unpaired t test comparing the number of MEPC5-adherent UPEC in the presence or absence of LYPD8 ( **** P < 0.0001, *** P < 0.001, ** P < 0.01, * P < 0.05).

Journal: Molecular Human Reproduction

Article Title: Differential tissue-specific damage caused by bacterial epididymo-orchitis in the mouse

doi: 10.1093/molehr/gaaa011

Figure Lengend Snippet: RT-qPCR analysis and comparison of modulation of antimicrobial factors in caput and cauda epididymidis and Lypd8 assessment in mouse and in vitro assay. ( A ) beta-defensins, ( B ) UPEC-associated antimicrobial factors. Unpaired t test ( * ) or Mann–Whitney U test (#) for each organ, respectively, comparing sham to UPEC-infected mice ( **** P < 0.0001, *** P < 0.001, ** P < 0.01, * P < 0.05). Fold change calculated via 2 (−ddCT) method. Data presented as box-and-whisker with median and min/max. cap = caput, cau = cauda. Sham 10 days, caput n = 4, cauda n = 4; UPEC 10 days, caput n = 4, cauda n = 6. ( C ) Laser-assisted microdissection of caput epithelium and caput interstitium from wild-type epididymis, n = 2. Relative expression calculated via 2 (−dCT) method. Data presented as mean ± SD. ( D ) Bacterial adherence to MEPC5 cells under the presence (+) or absence (−) of 1 μg/ml human recombinant LYPD8 (hLYPD8). CFU/ml were calculated after incubation of agar plates at 37°C for 24 h. Summary of three independent experiments with each time n = 2–3 per group. Unpaired t test comparing the number of MEPC5-adherent UPEC in the presence or absence of LYPD8 ( **** P < 0.0001, *** P < 0.001, ** P < 0.01, * P < 0.05).

Article Snippet: To assess the effects of LYPD8 on bacterial adherence to epididymal epithelial cells in vitro , UPEC were pre-incubated for 1 h on ice with or without 1 μg/ml human recombinant LYPD8 (product no. 9087-C4, Novus Biological, CO, USA) ( Okumura et al ., 2016 ) before infection of MEPC5 cells.

Techniques: Quantitative RT-PCR, Comparison, In Vitro, MANN-WHITNEY, Infection, Whisker Assay, Laser Capture Microdissection, Expressing, Recombinant, Incubation