Cell Signaling Technology Inc
ezh2 ![]() Ezh2, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 98/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/ezh2/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc Average 98 stars, based on 1 article reviews Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
ezh2 - by Bioz Stars,
2023-03
98/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
Eppendorf AG
microinjector 5246 ![]() Microinjector 5246, supplied by Eppendorf AG, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/microinjector 5246/product/Eppendorf AG Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
microinjector 5246 - by Bioz Stars,
2023-03
86/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
Eppendorf AG
transjector 5246 ![]() Transjector 5246, supplied by Eppendorf AG, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/transjector 5246/product/Eppendorf AG Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
transjector 5246 - by Bioz Stars,
2023-03
94/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
Image Search Results

Journal: Nature cell biology
Article Title: An androgen receptor switch underlies lineage infidelity in treatment-resistant prostate cancer
doi: 10.1038/s41556-021-00743-5
Figure Lengend Snippet: (a) Heatmap of EZH2 ChIP-seq signal intensity in CRPC 16DCRPC and 42DENZR cell lines (left), with overlaid H3K27Ac and H3K27Me3 histone mark ChIP-seq (right). Each horizontal line represents a 6-kb locus. (b) Representative ChIP-seq tracks surrounding the WNT5A locus in 16DCRPC and 42ENZR cells. Regions of EZH2 co-occupancy with the active H3K27Ac histone mark are highlighted. (c) Relative expression of genes bound by EZH2 alone (EZH2-none) or co-operatively with H3K27Me3 (EZH2-me) and H3K27Ac (EZH2-ac) histone marks in 42DENZR and 42FENZR cell lines. Box plot shows mean and interquartile range. (d) Heatmap of H3K27Me3 and K3K27Ac ChIP-seq signal intensity surrounding AR:EZH2 co-occupied regions in 42DENZR cells. (e) Heatmap indicating AR and EZH2 ChIP-seq signal intensity at AR:EZH2 co-occupied sites (n = 2155) in 42DENZR cells, and EZH2 signal intensity at the corresponding sites in AR-negative cell lines: NCI-H660, DU145 (GEO: GSE135623), and PC-3 (GEO: GSE123204). The shade of green (AR) or blue (EZH2) reflects binding intensity. Each horizontal line represents a 6-kb locus.
Article Snippet: Immunohistochemical staining was performed on deparaffinized FFPE sections using a Ventana Discovery XT automated immunostainer using the following antibodies: AR (clone N-20; 1:50; Santa Cruz sc-816, lot no. G1916), pCDK1-T161 (1:400; Abcam ab47329, lot no. r3260427–5),
Techniques: ChIP-sequencing, Expressing, Binding Assay
![(a) EZH2 was immunoprecipitated in 42ENZR cells, trypsin digested, and analyzed by mass spectrometry. Peptides covering 36% of EZH2 were recovered and analyzed for post-translational modifications. (n = 4 independent replicates). (b) Expression of total and phosphorylated (T350, S21, and T311 residues) EZH2 in the indicated cell lines. Protein abundance was assessed by densitometry and is reported relative to total EZH2. (c) IHC staining of pEZH2-S21 and pEZH2-T350 in serial sections from representative CRPC (n = 39) and NEPC (n = 26) patient tumours (Scale bar, 100 μm). Staining area and intensity was quantified and reported (mean ± SD; two-tailed unpaired t-test). (d) Expression of genes positively regulated by EZH2 when phosphorylated at S21 [defined by Xu et al.] in the indicated cell lines and patient tumours from the Beltran 2016 cohort. Statistical analysis was performed using a two-tailed unpaired t-test. Box plots show mean and interquartile range. ns, not significant. (e) qRT-PCR of NE lineage markers in CRPCcrEZH2 cells expressing myc-tagged EZH2S21A or EZH2S21D mutants, reported relative to empty vector transfected cells. (mean ± SD; two-tailed unpaired t-test, n = 3). Immunoblotting confirmed transgene expression. (f) Proliferation of parental 16DCRPC (control) and CRPCcrEZH2 cells stably expressing EZH2T350A and EZH2T350D phospho-mutants assessed by IncuCyte (mean ± SD, n = 3 replicates). Immunoblotting confirmed transgene expression. (g) qRT-PCR of plasticity and NE markers in VCaP and C4–2 cell lines co-transfected with EZH2 siRNA and siRNA-resistant myc-tagged EZH2WT, EZH2T350A, or EZH2T350D plasmid following treatment with ENZ (10 μM) for 7 days (mean ± SD; two-tailed unpaired t-test, n = 3).](https://pub-med-central-images-cdn.bioz.com/pub_med_central_ids_ending_with_2003/pmc09012003/pmc09012003__nihms-1789005-f0012.jpg)
Journal: Nature cell biology
Article Title: An androgen receptor switch underlies lineage infidelity in treatment-resistant prostate cancer
doi: 10.1038/s41556-021-00743-5
Figure Lengend Snippet: (a) EZH2 was immunoprecipitated in 42ENZR cells, trypsin digested, and analyzed by mass spectrometry. Peptides covering 36% of EZH2 were recovered and analyzed for post-translational modifications. (n = 4 independent replicates). (b) Expression of total and phosphorylated (T350, S21, and T311 residues) EZH2 in the indicated cell lines. Protein abundance was assessed by densitometry and is reported relative to total EZH2. (c) IHC staining of pEZH2-S21 and pEZH2-T350 in serial sections from representative CRPC (n = 39) and NEPC (n = 26) patient tumours (Scale bar, 100 μm). Staining area and intensity was quantified and reported (mean ± SD; two-tailed unpaired t-test). (d) Expression of genes positively regulated by EZH2 when phosphorylated at S21 [defined by Xu et al.] in the indicated cell lines and patient tumours from the Beltran 2016 cohort. Statistical analysis was performed using a two-tailed unpaired t-test. Box plots show mean and interquartile range. ns, not significant. (e) qRT-PCR of NE lineage markers in CRPCcrEZH2 cells expressing myc-tagged EZH2S21A or EZH2S21D mutants, reported relative to empty vector transfected cells. (mean ± SD; two-tailed unpaired t-test, n = 3). Immunoblotting confirmed transgene expression. (f) Proliferation of parental 16DCRPC (control) and CRPCcrEZH2 cells stably expressing EZH2T350A and EZH2T350D phospho-mutants assessed by IncuCyte (mean ± SD, n = 3 replicates). Immunoblotting confirmed transgene expression. (g) qRT-PCR of plasticity and NE markers in VCaP and C4–2 cell lines co-transfected with EZH2 siRNA and siRNA-resistant myc-tagged EZH2WT, EZH2T350A, or EZH2T350D plasmid following treatment with ENZ (10 μM) for 7 days (mean ± SD; two-tailed unpaired t-test, n = 3).
Article Snippet: Immunohistochemical staining was performed on deparaffinized FFPE sections using a Ventana Discovery XT automated immunostainer using the following antibodies: AR (clone N-20; 1:50; Santa Cruz sc-816, lot no. G1916), pCDK1-T161 (1:400; Abcam ab47329, lot no. r3260427–5),
Techniques: Immunoprecipitation, Mass Spectrometry, Expressing, Immunohistochemistry, Staining, Two Tailed Test, Quantitative RT-PCR, Plasmid Preparation, Transfection, Western Blot, Stable Transfection

Journal: Nature cell biology
Article Title: An androgen receptor switch underlies lineage infidelity in treatment-resistant prostate cancer
doi: 10.1038/s41556-021-00743-5
Figure Lengend Snippet: a, Abundance of AR, FOXA1, SUZ12 and EED peptides detected using RIME with AR antibodies as bait. Each dot represents an independent replicate, with a solid line denoting the mean. b, SUZ12 immunoprecipitation (IP) followed by immunoblotting for AR and PRC2 subunits. The relative abundance of AR was normalized to SUZ12 pulldown. c, AR–EZH2 PLA and quantification of nuclear PLA signals (red dots) from a single plane (mean ±s.d.; P < 0.0001, two-tailed unpaired t-test; n = 3). Each dot represents the number of PLA signals in a single nucleus. Scale bar, 10 μm. d, Frequency of AR-bound genes with EZH2, SUZ12 and/or EED co-occupancy based on ChIP-seq peak annotation (±50 kb from the nearest TSS) in 42DENZR cells. e, Overlap of genomic regions co-occupied by AR and EZH2 ChIP-seq peaks (AR–EZH2 complex) with ChIP-seq peaks for the H3K27Me3 and H3K27Ac in 42DENZR cells. f, Heat map of AR and EZH2 ChIP-seq signal intensity in 16DCRPC and 42DENZR cells, with corresponding ATAC-seq peak intensity. g, Overlap of AR and EZH2 ChIP-seq peaks in 16DCRPC and 42DENZR cell lines. h, Overlap of AR and EZH2 ChIP-seq peaks in the Ptenf/f;Rb1f/f (DKO) GEMM. i, Enriched reactome pathways with genes co-occupied by AR–EZH2 in 42DENZR cells and the Ptenf/f/Rb1f/f GEMM. The size of each circular data point reflects the degree to which genes in the pathway are enriched based on RNA-seq from 42DENZR compared with 16DCRPC cells. NS, not significant. j, Expression of AR–EZH2 co-bound genes in matched prostate tumours (P1–P3) pre- and post-ENZ therapy (n = 3) from the DARANA trial. Box plot shows mean and interquartile range. Statistical analysis was performed using a paired t-test. k, Venn diagram of overlap in genes downregulated (log2FC < 1) in 42DENZR cells following depletion of AR using CRISPR (crAR) or EZH2 inhibition (10 μm GSK126; 96 h). The heat map depicts relative expression of select AR–EZH2 co-bound genes, reported relative to parental cells. l, Sequential ChIP (Re-ChIP) for selected binding sites in 42DENZR cells treated with vehicle or EZH2 inhibitor (10 μm GSK126, 96 h). Cells were first analysed by chromatin immunoprecipitation with AR antibody and then immunoprecipitated again with an AR or EZH2 antibody, as indicated. Results are reported relative to IgG control (mean ± s.d., n = 2).
Article Snippet: Immunohistochemical staining was performed on deparaffinized FFPE sections using a Ventana Discovery XT automated immunostainer using the following antibodies: AR (clone N-20; 1:50; Santa Cruz sc-816, lot no. G1916), pCDK1-T161 (1:400; Abcam ab47329, lot no. r3260427–5),
Techniques: Immunoprecipitation, Western Blot, Two Tailed Test, ChIP-sequencing, RNA Sequencing Assay, Expressing, CRISPR, Inhibition, Binding Assay, Chromatin Immunoprecipitation

Journal: Nature cell biology
Article Title: An androgen receptor switch underlies lineage infidelity in treatment-resistant prostate cancer
doi: 10.1038/s41556-021-00743-5
Figure Lengend Snippet: a, Expression of plasticity and neuroendocrine markers by real-time PCR (rtPCR) and Western blot in 16DCRPC cells with CRISPR-mediated EZH2 knockout (16DCRPC crEZH2) following 7 d ENZ treatment. Cells transfected with a non-silencing scrambled guide RNA (crSCR) served as a control. Data are reported relative to non-transfected cells (mean ± s.d., n = 3). Two-tailed unpaired t-test. b, Tumour growth velocity of CRPC cells with CRISPR-mediated EZH2 knockout transplanted subcutaneously into nude mice, followed by treatment with vehicle (veh) or ENZ (n = 5 mice per group). Box plots show mean and interquartile range. Mann–Whitney test. c, Gene expression analysis (by rtPCR) in 16DCRPC control and crEZH2 xenograft tumours at the experimental end point. Data are reported relative to vehicle-treated mice (mean ± s.d.; *P = 0.05, two-tailed unpaired t-test; n = 3 mice per treatment group). d, Strategy used to establish the 16Dreporter cell line carrying GFP and mCherry fluorescent reporters in the endogenous OCT4 and ASCL1 loci, respectively. Fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) plot shows gating used to isolate the individual cell populations. HL, left homology arm; HR, right homology arm. e, Immunofluorescence images for OCT4-GFP (green) and ASCL1-mCherry (red) in CRPCreporter cells at the indicated time points after ENZ treatment. Single cells were tracked and are denoted with arrows. Scale bar, 100 μm. f, Fold change in transcript abundance of genes unique and common to the OCT4+, ASCL1+ and hybrid (OCT4+ASCL1+) FACS-isolated CRPCreporter cell populations relative to the negative population (log2FC cut-off of 1.5), by RNA-seq. g, MSigDB pathways enriched for common genes (n = 468) upregulated (defined as log2FC > 1.5) across OCT4+, ASCL1+ and hybrid (OCT4+ASCL1+) CRPCreporter populations relative to the negative population. Statistical analysis was performed using a hypergeometric test. h, EZH2 activity score, calculated on the basis of z-score-transformed expression of genes in the ‘Kondo EZH2 targets’ signature from MSigDB, in negative, OCT4+, ASCL1+ and hybrid (OCT4+ASCL1+) CRPCreporter FACS-isolated cell populations. i, Quantification of GFP+ and ASCL1+ fluorescent CRPCreporter cells following treatment with ENZ (10 μM) alone or in combination with EZH2 inhibitor (10 μM GSK126) using the IncuCyte fluorescent object counting algorithm (mean ± s.d., n = 2). Representative images at 8 d after treatment are shown. Scale bar, 50 μm.
Article Snippet: Immunohistochemical staining was performed on deparaffinized FFPE sections using a Ventana Discovery XT automated immunostainer using the following antibodies: AR (clone N-20; 1:50; Santa Cruz sc-816, lot no. G1916), pCDK1-T161 (1:400; Abcam ab47329, lot no. r3260427–5),
Techniques: Expressing, Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction, Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction, Western Blot, CRISPR, Knock-Out, Transfection, Two Tailed Test, MANN-WHITNEY, Fluorescence, FACS, Immunofluorescence, Isolation, RNA Sequencing Assay, Activity Assay, Transformation Assay

Journal: Nature cell biology
Article Title: An androgen receptor switch underlies lineage infidelity in treatment-resistant prostate cancer
doi: 10.1038/s41556-021-00743-5
Figure Lengend Snippet: a, Heat map of AR, EZH2 and pEZH2-T350 ChIP-seq binding intensity in 42DENZR cells. Each horizontal line represents a 6-kb locus. b, Frequency of AR ChIP-seq peaks overlapping with EZH2 and pEZH2-T350 ChIP-seq peaks in 42DENZR cells. c, Distribution of AR–EZH2 and AR–pEZH2 co-bound peaks in relation to the TSS. Peaks were mapped into 5-kb bins. d, PLA analysis of the interaction between AR and pEZH2-T350, and quantification of nuclear PLA signals (red dots) from a single plane (mean ± s.d.; P = 3.8 × 10−10, two-tailed unpaired t-test; n = 3). Each dot represents the number of PLA signals in a single nucleus. Scale bar, 10 μm. e, Overlap of genes co-bound to AR–EZH2 occupied by SUZ12- and/or EED, based on ChIP-seq peak annotation in 42DENZR cells. Gene annotation was restricted to ±50 kb from TSS. f, Expression of genes with promoter-bound (defined as ±3 kb from TSS) AR alone or co-occupancy with EZH2 or pEZH2-T350 in 42DENZR and 42FENZR cell lines. Data are mean expression ± s.d., with significance assessed using a two-tailed unpaired t-test. g, Expression of AR–pEZH2 co-bound genes in matched individual patient tumours pre- and post-ENZ therapy from the DARANA trial (n = 3). Box plots show mean and interquartile range. Statistical analysis was performed using a paired t-test. h, Gene ontology signatures from MSigDB enriched for AR–EZH2 and AR–pEZH2 co-bound genes in 42DENZR cells. Statistical analysis was performed using a hypergeometric test. i, Immunohistochemical staining for AR, pEZH2-T350 and SYP (neuroendocrine marker) in serial sections from non-treated (naive) and neoadjuvant ADT/TAX-treated (4.5 months) prostate tumours from the CALGB 90203 clinical trial. Treated tumours were binned on the basis of pEZH2-T350 staining intensity, and matched NanoString-based sequencing was used to assess the expression of plasticity factors in pEZH2-low (n = 8) and pEZH2-high (n = 4) tumours. Box plots show mean and interquartile range of z-score-transformed expression values with significance assessed using a two-tailed unpaired t-test. Scale bar, 100 μm.
Article Snippet: Immunohistochemical staining was performed on deparaffinized FFPE sections using a Ventana Discovery XT automated immunostainer using the following antibodies: AR (clone N-20; 1:50; Santa Cruz sc-816, lot no. G1916), pCDK1-T161 (1:400; Abcam ab47329, lot no. r3260427–5),
Techniques: ChIP-sequencing, Binding Assay, Two Tailed Test, Expressing, Immunohistochemical staining, Staining, Marker, Sequencing, Transformation Assay

Journal: Nature cell biology
Article Title: An androgen receptor switch underlies lineage infidelity in treatment-resistant prostate cancer
doi: 10.1038/s41556-021-00743-5
Figure Lengend Snippet: a, Immunoblot of total and phosphorylated EZH2 and CDK1 in the indicated prostate cancer cell lines. HPCS, high-plasticity cell state. b, Immunoblot of EZH2 and pEZH2-T350 following CDK1 inhibition (5 μM RO-3306, 6 h). c, Immunohistochemical staining for pEZH2-T350 and pCDK1-T161 in serial sections from treatment-naive (N, n = 30), CRPC (CR, n = 40) and NEPC (NE, n = 26) clinical samples. Scale bar, 100 μm. Staining intensity was quantified (mean ± s.d.; two-tailed unpaired t-test). d, SUZ12 and EED peptides detected by RIME using EZH2 and pEZH2-T350 antibodies as bait in 42ENZR cells. Each dot represents an independent replicate, with a solid line denoting mean. Significance was defined as ≥4 peptides. e, Myc-tagged wild-type EZH2 (EZH2WT) and T350 phospho-mimicking (EZH2T350D) and phospho-dead (EZH2T350A) mutants were transiently transfected into 16DCRPC cells with endogenous EZH2 deletion for 72 h. Immunoprecipitation was performed using a Myc tag antibody. f, Distribution of pEZH2-T350, SUZ12 and EED ChIP-seq peaks in relation to the nearest TSS. The density of polycomb subunits and H3K27Ac are shown surrounding the WNT5A locus. g, Proportion of EZH2 and pEZH2-T350 ChIP-seq peaks overlapping with H3K27Me3 and H3K27Ac ChIP-seq peaks in 42DENZR cells. The distribution of H3K27Ac alone and co-occupied with pEZH2-T350 (pEZH2-ac) in relation to the TSS is shown. h, Single-sample GSEA (ssGSEA) score of MSigDB pathways in CRPCcrEZH2 cells expressing EZH2T350A or EZH2T350D mutant, and adenocarcinoma (CRPC-Adeno) and NEPC (CRPC-NE) patient specimens from the Beltran 2016 cohort4. The ASC score is shown below each cell line or individual patient. i, rtPCR and immunoblot in 42DENZR cells with EZH2 knockdown, stably expressing siRNA-resistant Myc-tagged EZH2WT or EZH2T350A mutant for 72 h. Data are reported relative to cells transfected with empty vector (EV) (mean ± s.d.; two-tailed unpaired t-test, n = 2). j, Immunohistochemical staining for EZH2 and SYP in serial sections from CRPCcrEZH2 EZH2T350A and EZH2T350D mutant xenografts treated with vehicle or ENZ. Scale bar, 100 μm. SYP staining intensity was quantified; box plots show mean and interquartile range. k, Flow cytometry plots of CD44 and NCAM1 cell surface expression in dissociated tumour cells from EZH2T350A and EZH2T350D mutant xenografts.
Article Snippet: Immunohistochemical staining was performed on deparaffinized FFPE sections using a Ventana Discovery XT automated immunostainer using the following antibodies: AR (clone N-20; 1:50; Santa Cruz sc-816, lot no. G1916), pCDK1-T161 (1:400; Abcam ab47329, lot no. r3260427–5),
Techniques: Western Blot, Inhibition, Immunohistochemical staining, Staining, Two Tailed Test, Transfection, Immunoprecipitation, ChIP-sequencing, Expressing, Mutagenesis, Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction, Stable Transfection, Plasmid Preparation, Flow Cytometry

Journal: Nature cell biology
Article Title: An androgen receptor switch underlies lineage infidelity in treatment-resistant prostate cancer
doi: 10.1038/s41556-021-00743-5
Figure Lengend Snippet: a, PCA of global transcriptome in the indicated cell lines. 42DENZR cells with AR knockout (AR KO) and inhibited EZH2 activity (10 μM GSK126, 96 h) are shown. b, ASC and NEPC scores in patient tumours from ref. 5 (adenocarcinoma cluster 5, n = 28; AR+NE+, n = 10; AR−NE+, n = 3) and the indicated cell lines. c, GSEA signatures enriched (Fisher’s exact test, P < 0.05) in 42DENZR cells following AR knockout or EZH2 inhibition (10 μM GSK126, 96 h). d, Volcano plot of peptides detected by RIME using EZH2 antibodies as bait in 42DENZR cells treated with DMSO or EZH2 inhibitor (10 μM GSK126, 96 h). Statistical analysis was performed using a two-tailed unpaired t-test (n = 3). e, Immunoprecipitation of EZH2 in 42DENZR cells treated with 10 μM GSK126 for 96 h followed by immunoblotting. f, Immunoblot of SUZ12 in nuclear soluble and chromatin-bound fractions in 42DENZR cells treated with 10 μM GSK126 for 96 h. g, PLA analysis of AR–EZH2 in 42DENZR cells following EZH2 inhibition (10 μM GSK126, 96 h). Nuclear PLA signals from a single plane were quantified (mean ± s.d.; P = 3.1 × 10−16, two-tailed unpaired t-test; n = 3). Scale bar, 10 μm. h, Chromatin immunoprecipitation–PCR (ChIP–PCR) for AR at the AREs within the KLK3 enhancer in 42DENZR cells following treatment with EZH2 inhibitor (10 μM GSK126, 96 h). Results reported relative to IgG control (mean ± s.d.; P = 0.018, two-tailed unpaired t-test; n = 4). F, forward; R, reverse. i, rtPCR in 42DENZR cells treated with EZH2 inhibitor (10 μM GSK126 or GSK343, 96 h) or EED inhibitor (1 μM A-395, 96 h). Data reported relative to vehicle-treated cells (mean ± s.d., two-tailed unpaired t-test; n = 3). Western blot confirmed PRC2 inhibition. j, Confluency measured using IncuCyte (mean ± s.d., n = 2). At 48 h after seeding, cells were treated with EZH2 inhibitor (10 mM GSK126). k, Proliferation of 42DENZR cells treated with ENZ (10 μM) and EZH2 inhibitor (2 μM GSK126) alone or in combination, measured using IncuCyte. EZH2 inhibitor was removed (washout) at 96 h. Data plotted are mean ± s.d. (n = 3), with significance evaluated using a two-tailed unpaired t-test at the end point.
Article Snippet: Immunohistochemical staining was performed on deparaffinized FFPE sections using a Ventana Discovery XT automated immunostainer using the following antibodies: AR (clone N-20; 1:50; Santa Cruz sc-816, lot no. G1916), pCDK1-T161 (1:400; Abcam ab47329, lot no. r3260427–5),
Techniques: Knock-Out, Activity Assay, Inhibition, Two Tailed Test, Immunoprecipitation, Western Blot, Chromatin Immunoprecipitation, Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction

Journal: Nature cell biology
Article Title: An androgen receptor switch underlies lineage infidelity in treatment-resistant prostate cancer
doi: 10.1038/s41556-021-00743-5
Figure Lengend Snippet: (a) Immunoblot AR, EZH2, and H3K27Me3 (a surrogate marker of EZH2 activity) in 42DENZR cells following CRISPR-mediated AR deletion (crAR) or EZH2 inhibition (10 μM GSK126, 96 hrs). (b) Relative expression (qRT-PCR) of neuroendocrine lineage markers in 16DCRPC and C4–2 cell lines following siRNA-mediated AR silencing for 96 hours. Data are reported relative to cells transfected with a non-silencing scrambled control (mean ± SD, n = 3). A fold change >2 is considered significant. Immunoblotting confirmed AR knockdown.
Article Snippet: Immunohistochemical staining was performed on deparaffinized FFPE sections using a Ventana Discovery XT automated immunostainer using the following antibodies: AR (clone N-20; 1:50; Santa Cruz sc-816, lot no. G1916), pCDK1-T161 (1:400; Abcam ab47329, lot no. r3260427–5),
Techniques: Western Blot, Marker, Activity Assay, CRISPR, Inhibition, Expressing, Quantitative RT-PCR, Transfection

Journal: Nature cell biology
Article Title: An androgen receptor switch underlies lineage infidelity in treatment-resistant prostate cancer
doi: 10.1038/s41556-021-00743-5
Figure Lengend Snippet: (a-b) qRT-PCR in 42DENZR (a) and 42FENZR (b) cells following siRNA-mediated EZH2 silencing (siEZH2) for the indicated time, reported relative to non-transfected control cells at day 0 (mean ± SD; two-tailed unpaired t-test, n = 3). NTC, non-targeting control. (c-d) Spheroid formation and ALDH activity in 42DENZR (c) and 42FENZR (d) cells following siRNA-mediated EZH2 silencing (siEZH2; left) or treatment with increasing dose of EZH2 inhibitor (GSK126; right) for 8 days (mean ± SD; two-tailed unpaired t-test, n = 2). (e) qRT-PCR in 42DENZR cells treated with EZH2 inhibitor (10 μM GSK126) for 7 days, followed by removal (washout) for 14 days. Expression is reported relative to cells at day 0 (mean ± SD; two-tailed unpaired t-test, n = 3). Immunoblotting confirmed on-target effect.
Article Snippet: Immunohistochemical staining was performed on deparaffinized FFPE sections using a Ventana Discovery XT automated immunostainer using the following antibodies: AR (clone N-20; 1:50; Santa Cruz sc-816, lot no. G1916), pCDK1-T161 (1:400; Abcam ab47329, lot no. r3260427–5),
Techniques: Expressing, Activity Assay, Quantitative RT-PCR, Transfection, Two Tailed Test, Western Blot