spt labtech mosquito hv  (SPT Labtech)


Bioz Verified Symbol SPT Labtech is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol SPT Labtech manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 94

    Structured Review

    SPT Labtech spt labtech mosquito hv
    Testing overview for SSsc and SSlp kits. For all testing schema, sample preparation was followed by library preparation, Illumina sequencing, and analysis using Cogent AP software. ( A ) Workflow for testing cultured cells (GM12878 and CHO cells) isolated by Fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS). This workflow was used for a performance comparison between SSsc and SS2 and for verifying compatibility with miniaturized volumes on the MANTIS (Formulatrix) and <t>mosquito</t> <t>(SPT</t> <t>Labtech)</t> (Figs. 2 and 5). ( B ) Workflow for performance comparison between SSsc and SS3. CD3 + T cells were isolated from human PBMCs by FACS, and the appropriate user manual or protocol was followed for RNA isolation (Fig. 3). ( C ) Workflow for performance comparison between SSsc PLUS (SSsc + SSlp) and Nextera XT using isolated RNA (control mouse brain RNA; Fig. 4).
    Spt Labtech Mosquito Hv, supplied by SPT Labtech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 5 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/spt labtech mosquito hv/product/SPT Labtech
    Average 94 stars, based on 5 article reviews
    Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
    spt labtech mosquito hv - by Bioz Stars, 2022-10
    94/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Benchmarking Single-Cell mRNA–Sequencing Technologies Uncovers Differences in Sensitivity and Reproducibility in Cell Types With Low RNA Content"

    Article Title: Benchmarking Single-Cell mRNA–Sequencing Technologies Uncovers Differences in Sensitivity and Reproducibility in Cell Types With Low RNA Content

    Journal: Journal of Biomolecular Techniques : JBT

    doi: 10.7171/3fc1f5fe.dbeabb2a

    Testing overview for SSsc and SSlp kits. For all testing schema, sample preparation was followed by library preparation, Illumina sequencing, and analysis using Cogent AP software. ( A ) Workflow for testing cultured cells (GM12878 and CHO cells) isolated by Fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS). This workflow was used for a performance comparison between SSsc and SS2 and for verifying compatibility with miniaturized volumes on the MANTIS (Formulatrix) and mosquito (SPT Labtech) (Figs. 2 and 5). ( B ) Workflow for performance comparison between SSsc and SS3. CD3 + T cells were isolated from human PBMCs by FACS, and the appropriate user manual or protocol was followed for RNA isolation (Fig. 3). ( C ) Workflow for performance comparison between SSsc PLUS (SSsc + SSlp) and Nextera XT using isolated RNA (control mouse brain RNA; Fig. 4).
    Figure Legend Snippet: Testing overview for SSsc and SSlp kits. For all testing schema, sample preparation was followed by library preparation, Illumina sequencing, and analysis using Cogent AP software. ( A ) Workflow for testing cultured cells (GM12878 and CHO cells) isolated by Fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS). This workflow was used for a performance comparison between SSsc and SS2 and for verifying compatibility with miniaturized volumes on the MANTIS (Formulatrix) and mosquito (SPT Labtech) (Figs. 2 and 5). ( B ) Workflow for performance comparison between SSsc and SS3. CD3 + T cells were isolated from human PBMCs by FACS, and the appropriate user manual or protocol was followed for RNA isolation (Fig. 3). ( C ) Workflow for performance comparison between SSsc PLUS (SSsc + SSlp) and Nextera XT using isolated RNA (control mouse brain RNA; Fig. 4).

    Techniques Used: Sample Prep, Sequencing, Software, Cell Culture, Isolation, Fluorescence, FACS, Single-particle Tracking

    Similar Products

  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 94
    SPT Labtech spt labtech mosquito hv
    Testing overview for SSsc and SSlp kits. For all testing schema, sample preparation was followed by library preparation, Illumina sequencing, and analysis using Cogent AP software. ( A ) Workflow for testing cultured cells (GM12878 and CHO cells) isolated by Fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS). This workflow was used for a performance comparison between SSsc and SS2 and for verifying compatibility with miniaturized volumes on the MANTIS (Formulatrix) and <t>mosquito</t> <t>(SPT</t> <t>Labtech)</t> (Figs. 2 and 5). ( B ) Workflow for performance comparison between SSsc and SS3. CD3 + T cells were isolated from human PBMCs by FACS, and the appropriate user manual or protocol was followed for RNA isolation (Fig. 3). ( C ) Workflow for performance comparison between SSsc PLUS (SSsc + SSlp) and Nextera XT using isolated RNA (control mouse brain RNA; Fig. 4).
    Spt Labtech Mosquito Hv, supplied by SPT Labtech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 6 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/spt labtech mosquito hv/product/SPT Labtech
    Average 94 stars, based on 6 article reviews
    Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
    spt labtech mosquito hv - by Bioz Stars, 2022-10
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Testing overview for SSsc and SSlp kits. For all testing schema, sample preparation was followed by library preparation, Illumina sequencing, and analysis using Cogent AP software. ( A ) Workflow for testing cultured cells (GM12878 and CHO cells) isolated by Fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS). This workflow was used for a performance comparison between SSsc and SS2 and for verifying compatibility with miniaturized volumes on the MANTIS (Formulatrix) and mosquito (SPT Labtech) (Figs. 2 and 5). ( B ) Workflow for performance comparison between SSsc and SS3. CD3 + T cells were isolated from human PBMCs by FACS, and the appropriate user manual or protocol was followed for RNA isolation (Fig. 3). ( C ) Workflow for performance comparison between SSsc PLUS (SSsc + SSlp) and Nextera XT using isolated RNA (control mouse brain RNA; Fig. 4).

    Journal: Journal of Biomolecular Techniques : JBT

    Article Title: Benchmarking Single-Cell mRNA–Sequencing Technologies Uncovers Differences in Sensitivity and Reproducibility in Cell Types With Low RNA Content

    doi: 10.7171/3fc1f5fe.dbeabb2a

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Testing overview for SSsc and SSlp kits. For all testing schema, sample preparation was followed by library preparation, Illumina sequencing, and analysis using Cogent AP software. ( A ) Workflow for testing cultured cells (GM12878 and CHO cells) isolated by Fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS). This workflow was used for a performance comparison between SSsc and SS2 and for verifying compatibility with miniaturized volumes on the MANTIS (Formulatrix) and mosquito (SPT Labtech) (Figs. 2 and 5). ( B ) Workflow for performance comparison between SSsc and SS3. CD3 + T cells were isolated from human PBMCs by FACS, and the appropriate user manual or protocol was followed for RNA isolation (Fig. 3). ( C ) Workflow for performance comparison between SSsc PLUS (SSsc + SSlp) and Nextera XT using isolated RNA (control mouse brain RNA; Fig. 4).

    Article Snippet: The Formulatrix MANTIS and SPT Labtech mosquito HV, 2 of the most commonly used liquid handlers in the single-cell RNA-seq community, were used to compare SSsc’s sensitivity at full volume (FV) versus the commonly used miniaturized volume for each instrument: quarter volume (Quarter) on the MANTIS and one-eighth volume (Eighth) on the mosquito HV.

    Techniques: Sample Prep, Sequencing, Software, Cell Culture, Isolation, Fluorescence, FACS, Single-particle Tracking