quantstudio dx  (Thermo Fisher)


Bioz Verified Symbol Thermo Fisher is a verified supplier  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 97

    Structured Review

    Thermo Fisher quantstudio dx
    Analytical performance comparison between MP96 and LC 2.0 RNA extraction platforms in serum and urine. a Normal human serum or b urine pooled from healthy donors was contrived with ZIKV at a dilution of 1:10 before the limit of detection (1:10 BLoD), at the limit of detection (LoD), and at 1:10 after the limit of detection (1:10 ALoD). Twenty replicates of each dilution were extracted using the small volume protocol (0.2 mL) and were tested with the Trioplex assay on the ABI7500 Fast Dx instrument. The same serum ( c ) and urine ( d ) dilutions were tested on the <t>QuantStudio</t> Dx instrument. Mean genome copy equivalents per milliliter (GCE/mL) of viral RNA detected are displayed at each dilution. Error bars represent GCE/mL standard deviation. Straight line represents linear regression of MP96 platform (Roche). Dashed line represents linear regression of LC 2.0 platform (Roche)
    Quantstudio Dx, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 5 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/quantstudio dx/product/Thermo Fisher
    Average 97 stars, based on 5 article reviews
    Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
    quantstudio dx - by Bioz Stars, 2020-05
    97/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Performance of the Trioplex real-time RT-PCR assay for detection of Zika, dengue, and chikungunya viruses"

    Article Title: Performance of the Trioplex real-time RT-PCR assay for detection of Zika, dengue, and chikungunya viruses

    Journal: Nature Communications

    doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03772-1

    Analytical performance comparison between MP96 and LC 2.0 RNA extraction platforms in serum and urine. a Normal human serum or b urine pooled from healthy donors was contrived with ZIKV at a dilution of 1:10 before the limit of detection (1:10 BLoD), at the limit of detection (LoD), and at 1:10 after the limit of detection (1:10 ALoD). Twenty replicates of each dilution were extracted using the small volume protocol (0.2 mL) and were tested with the Trioplex assay on the ABI7500 Fast Dx instrument. The same serum ( c ) and urine ( d ) dilutions were tested on the QuantStudio Dx instrument. Mean genome copy equivalents per milliliter (GCE/mL) of viral RNA detected are displayed at each dilution. Error bars represent GCE/mL standard deviation. Straight line represents linear regression of MP96 platform (Roche). Dashed line represents linear regression of LC 2.0 platform (Roche)
    Figure Legend Snippet: Analytical performance comparison between MP96 and LC 2.0 RNA extraction platforms in serum and urine. a Normal human serum or b urine pooled from healthy donors was contrived with ZIKV at a dilution of 1:10 before the limit of detection (1:10 BLoD), at the limit of detection (LoD), and at 1:10 after the limit of detection (1:10 ALoD). Twenty replicates of each dilution were extracted using the small volume protocol (0.2 mL) and were tested with the Trioplex assay on the ABI7500 Fast Dx instrument. The same serum ( c ) and urine ( d ) dilutions were tested on the QuantStudio Dx instrument. Mean genome copy equivalents per milliliter (GCE/mL) of viral RNA detected are displayed at each dilution. Error bars represent GCE/mL standard deviation. Straight line represents linear regression of MP96 platform (Roche). Dashed line represents linear regression of LC 2.0 platform (Roche)

    Techniques Used: RNA Extraction, Standard Deviation

    Analytical performance comparison between MP96 and LC 2.0 RNA extraction platforms in whole blood (EDTA). A pool of whole blood donated by healthy donors was contrived with ZIKV at a dilution of 1:10 before the limit of detection (1:10 BLoD), at the limit of detection (LoD) and at 1:10 after the limit of detection (1:10 ALoD). Twenty replicas of every dilution were extracted using small volume protocol (0.2 mL) and tested with Trioplex assay on the ABI7500 Fast Dx instrument ( a ) or in the QuantStudio Dx instrument ( b ). Mean genome copy equivalents per milliliter (GCE/mL) of viral RNA detected are displayed at each dilution. Error bars represent GCE/mL standard deviation. Straight line represents linear regression of MP96 platform (Roche). Dashed line represents linear regression of LC 2.0 platform (Roche)
    Figure Legend Snippet: Analytical performance comparison between MP96 and LC 2.0 RNA extraction platforms in whole blood (EDTA). A pool of whole blood donated by healthy donors was contrived with ZIKV at a dilution of 1:10 before the limit of detection (1:10 BLoD), at the limit of detection (LoD) and at 1:10 after the limit of detection (1:10 ALoD). Twenty replicas of every dilution were extracted using small volume protocol (0.2 mL) and tested with Trioplex assay on the ABI7500 Fast Dx instrument ( a ) or in the QuantStudio Dx instrument ( b ). Mean genome copy equivalents per milliliter (GCE/mL) of viral RNA detected are displayed at each dilution. Error bars represent GCE/mL standard deviation. Straight line represents linear regression of MP96 platform (Roche). Dashed line represents linear regression of LC 2.0 platform (Roche)

    Techniques Used: RNA Extraction, Standard Deviation

    2) Product Images from "Performance of the Trioplex real-time RT-PCR assay for detection of Zika, dengue, and chikungunya viruses"

    Article Title: Performance of the Trioplex real-time RT-PCR assay for detection of Zika, dengue, and chikungunya viruses

    Journal: Nature Communications

    doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03772-1

    Analytical performance comparison between MP96 and LC 2.0 RNA extraction platforms in serum and urine. a Normal human serum or b urine pooled from healthy donors was contrived with ZIKV at a dilution of 1:10 before the limit of detection (1:10 BLoD), at the limit of detection (LoD), and at 1:10 after the limit of detection (1:10 ALoD). Twenty replicates of each dilution were extracted using the small volume protocol (0.2 mL) and were tested with the Trioplex assay on the ABI7500 Fast Dx instrument. The same serum ( c ) and urine ( d ) dilutions were tested on the QuantStudio Dx instrument. Mean genome copy equivalents per milliliter (GCE/mL) of viral RNA detected are displayed at each dilution. Error bars represent GCE/mL standard deviation. Straight line represents linear regression of MP96 platform (Roche). Dashed line represents linear regression of LC 2.0 platform (Roche)
    Figure Legend Snippet: Analytical performance comparison between MP96 and LC 2.0 RNA extraction platforms in serum and urine. a Normal human serum or b urine pooled from healthy donors was contrived with ZIKV at a dilution of 1:10 before the limit of detection (1:10 BLoD), at the limit of detection (LoD), and at 1:10 after the limit of detection (1:10 ALoD). Twenty replicates of each dilution were extracted using the small volume protocol (0.2 mL) and were tested with the Trioplex assay on the ABI7500 Fast Dx instrument. The same serum ( c ) and urine ( d ) dilutions were tested on the QuantStudio Dx instrument. Mean genome copy equivalents per milliliter (GCE/mL) of viral RNA detected are displayed at each dilution. Error bars represent GCE/mL standard deviation. Straight line represents linear regression of MP96 platform (Roche). Dashed line represents linear regression of LC 2.0 platform (Roche)

    Techniques Used: RNA Extraction, Standard Deviation

    Analytical performance comparison between Trioplex assay multiplex and the ZIKV singleplex format assay using small volume and large volume RNA extraction. Normal human serum or urine was contrived with ZIKV at a dilution of 1:10 before the limit of detection (1:10 BLoD), at the limit of detection (LoD), and at 1:10 after the limit of detection (1:10 ALoD). Twenty replicates of every dilution were extracted using the MagNA Pure 96 instrument (Roche) and tested by Trioplex assay multiplex or ZIKV singleplex format assay on the ABI 7500 Fast Dx or the QuantStudio Dx instruments. a Compares the mean genome copy equivalents per PCR reaction (GCE/rxn) of viral RNA extracted from serum at each dilution on the ABI 7500 Fast Dx instrument. A linear regression was plotted for multiplex with small volume protocol (Sv) (0.2 mL) (black straight line), singleplex assay with small volume protocol (gray straight line), multiplex with large volume protocol (Lv) (1 mL) (black dashed line). and singleplex assay with large volume protocol (gray dashed line). b Compares the mean genome copy equivalents per PCR reaction (GCE/rxn) of viral RNA extracted from serum or urine at each dilution on the QuantStudio Dx instrument. A linear regression was plotted for multiplex with small volume protocol serum (Sv) (black straight line), multiplex with large volume protocol serum (Lv) (gray straight line), multiplex with small volume protocol urine (Lv) (black dashed line), and multiplex with large volume protocol urine (gray dashed line). Error bars represent GCE/mL standard deviation. The CT values for every dilution replicate in serum tested was plotted for c small volume and d large volume extractions
    Figure Legend Snippet: Analytical performance comparison between Trioplex assay multiplex and the ZIKV singleplex format assay using small volume and large volume RNA extraction. Normal human serum or urine was contrived with ZIKV at a dilution of 1:10 before the limit of detection (1:10 BLoD), at the limit of detection (LoD), and at 1:10 after the limit of detection (1:10 ALoD). Twenty replicates of every dilution were extracted using the MagNA Pure 96 instrument (Roche) and tested by Trioplex assay multiplex or ZIKV singleplex format assay on the ABI 7500 Fast Dx or the QuantStudio Dx instruments. a Compares the mean genome copy equivalents per PCR reaction (GCE/rxn) of viral RNA extracted from serum at each dilution on the ABI 7500 Fast Dx instrument. A linear regression was plotted for multiplex with small volume protocol (Sv) (0.2 mL) (black straight line), singleplex assay with small volume protocol (gray straight line), multiplex with large volume protocol (Lv) (1 mL) (black dashed line). and singleplex assay with large volume protocol (gray dashed line). b Compares the mean genome copy equivalents per PCR reaction (GCE/rxn) of viral RNA extracted from serum or urine at each dilution on the QuantStudio Dx instrument. A linear regression was plotted for multiplex with small volume protocol serum (Sv) (black straight line), multiplex with large volume protocol serum (Lv) (gray straight line), multiplex with small volume protocol urine (Lv) (black dashed line), and multiplex with large volume protocol urine (gray dashed line). Error bars represent GCE/mL standard deviation. The CT values for every dilution replicate in serum tested was plotted for c small volume and d large volume extractions

    Techniques Used: Multiplex Assay, RNA Extraction, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Singleplex Assay, Standard Deviation

    Analytical performance comparison between MP96 and LC 2.0 RNA extraction platforms in whole blood (EDTA). A pool of whole blood donated by healthy donors was contrived with ZIKV at a dilution of 1:10 before the limit of detection (1:10 BLoD), at the limit of detection (LoD) and at 1:10 after the limit of detection (1:10 ALoD). Twenty replicas of every dilution were extracted using small volume protocol (0.2 mL) and tested with Trioplex assay on the ABI7500 Fast Dx instrument ( a ) or in the QuantStudio Dx instrument ( b ). Mean genome copy equivalents per milliliter (GCE/mL) of viral RNA detected are displayed at each dilution. Error bars represent GCE/mL standard deviation. Straight line represents linear regression of MP96 platform (Roche). Dashed line represents linear regression of LC 2.0 platform (Roche)
    Figure Legend Snippet: Analytical performance comparison between MP96 and LC 2.0 RNA extraction platforms in whole blood (EDTA). A pool of whole blood donated by healthy donors was contrived with ZIKV at a dilution of 1:10 before the limit of detection (1:10 BLoD), at the limit of detection (LoD) and at 1:10 after the limit of detection (1:10 ALoD). Twenty replicas of every dilution were extracted using small volume protocol (0.2 mL) and tested with Trioplex assay on the ABI7500 Fast Dx instrument ( a ) or in the QuantStudio Dx instrument ( b ). Mean genome copy equivalents per milliliter (GCE/mL) of viral RNA detected are displayed at each dilution. Error bars represent GCE/mL standard deviation. Straight line represents linear regression of MP96 platform (Roche). Dashed line represents linear regression of LC 2.0 platform (Roche)

    Techniques Used: RNA Extraction, Standard Deviation

    3) Product Images from "Performance of the Trioplex real-time RT-PCR assay for detection of Zika, dengue, and chikungunya viruses"

    Article Title: Performance of the Trioplex real-time RT-PCR assay for detection of Zika, dengue, and chikungunya viruses

    Journal: Nature Communications

    doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03772-1

    Analytical performance comparison between MP96 and LC 2.0 RNA extraction platforms in serum and urine. a Normal human serum or b urine pooled from healthy donors was contrived with ZIKV at a dilution of 1:10 before the limit of detection (1:10 BLoD), at the limit of detection (LoD), and at 1:10 after the limit of detection (1:10 ALoD). Twenty replicates of each dilution were extracted using the small volume protocol (0.2 mL) and were tested with the Trioplex assay on the ABI7500 Fast Dx instrument. The same serum ( c ) and urine ( d ) dilutions were tested on the QuantStudio Dx instrument. Mean genome copy equivalents per milliliter (GCE/mL) of viral RNA detected are displayed at each dilution. Error bars represent GCE/mL standard deviation. Straight line represents linear regression of MP96 platform (Roche). Dashed line represents linear regression of LC 2.0 platform (Roche)
    Figure Legend Snippet: Analytical performance comparison between MP96 and LC 2.0 RNA extraction platforms in serum and urine. a Normal human serum or b urine pooled from healthy donors was contrived with ZIKV at a dilution of 1:10 before the limit of detection (1:10 BLoD), at the limit of detection (LoD), and at 1:10 after the limit of detection (1:10 ALoD). Twenty replicates of each dilution were extracted using the small volume protocol (0.2 mL) and were tested with the Trioplex assay on the ABI7500 Fast Dx instrument. The same serum ( c ) and urine ( d ) dilutions were tested on the QuantStudio Dx instrument. Mean genome copy equivalents per milliliter (GCE/mL) of viral RNA detected are displayed at each dilution. Error bars represent GCE/mL standard deviation. Straight line represents linear regression of MP96 platform (Roche). Dashed line represents linear regression of LC 2.0 platform (Roche)

    Techniques Used: RNA Extraction, Standard Deviation

    Analytical performance comparison between Trioplex assay multiplex and the ZIKV singleplex format assay using small volume and large volume RNA extraction. Normal human serum or urine was contrived with ZIKV at a dilution of 1:10 before the limit of detection (1:10 BLoD), at the limit of detection (LoD), and at 1:10 after the limit of detection (1:10 ALoD). Twenty replicates of every dilution were extracted using the MagNA Pure 96 instrument (Roche) and tested by Trioplex assay multiplex or ZIKV singleplex format assay on the ABI 7500 Fast Dx or the QuantStudio Dx instruments. a Compares the mean genome copy equivalents per PCR reaction (GCE/rxn) of viral RNA extracted from serum at each dilution on the ABI 7500 Fast Dx instrument. A linear regression was plotted for multiplex with small volume protocol (Sv) (0.2 mL) (black straight line), singleplex assay with small volume protocol (gray straight line), multiplex with large volume protocol (Lv) (1 mL) (black dashed line). and singleplex assay with large volume protocol (gray dashed line). b Compares the mean genome copy equivalents per PCR reaction (GCE/rxn) of viral RNA extracted from serum or urine at each dilution on the QuantStudio Dx instrument. A linear regression was plotted for multiplex with small volume protocol serum (Sv) (black straight line), multiplex with large volume protocol serum (Lv) (gray straight line), multiplex with small volume protocol urine (Lv) (black dashed line), and multiplex with large volume protocol urine (gray dashed line). Error bars represent GCE/mL standard deviation. The CT values for every dilution replicate in serum tested was plotted for c small volume and d large volume extractions
    Figure Legend Snippet: Analytical performance comparison between Trioplex assay multiplex and the ZIKV singleplex format assay using small volume and large volume RNA extraction. Normal human serum or urine was contrived with ZIKV at a dilution of 1:10 before the limit of detection (1:10 BLoD), at the limit of detection (LoD), and at 1:10 after the limit of detection (1:10 ALoD). Twenty replicates of every dilution were extracted using the MagNA Pure 96 instrument (Roche) and tested by Trioplex assay multiplex or ZIKV singleplex format assay on the ABI 7500 Fast Dx or the QuantStudio Dx instruments. a Compares the mean genome copy equivalents per PCR reaction (GCE/rxn) of viral RNA extracted from serum at each dilution on the ABI 7500 Fast Dx instrument. A linear regression was plotted for multiplex with small volume protocol (Sv) (0.2 mL) (black straight line), singleplex assay with small volume protocol (gray straight line), multiplex with large volume protocol (Lv) (1 mL) (black dashed line). and singleplex assay with large volume protocol (gray dashed line). b Compares the mean genome copy equivalents per PCR reaction (GCE/rxn) of viral RNA extracted from serum or urine at each dilution on the QuantStudio Dx instrument. A linear regression was plotted for multiplex with small volume protocol serum (Sv) (black straight line), multiplex with large volume protocol serum (Lv) (gray straight line), multiplex with small volume protocol urine (Lv) (black dashed line), and multiplex with large volume protocol urine (gray dashed line). Error bars represent GCE/mL standard deviation. The CT values for every dilution replicate in serum tested was plotted for c small volume and d large volume extractions

    Techniques Used: Multiplex Assay, RNA Extraction, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Singleplex Assay, Standard Deviation

    Analytical performance comparison between MP96 and LC 2.0 RNA extraction platforms in whole blood (EDTA). A pool of whole blood donated by healthy donors was contrived with ZIKV at a dilution of 1:10 before the limit of detection (1:10 BLoD), at the limit of detection (LoD) and at 1:10 after the limit of detection (1:10 ALoD). Twenty replicas of every dilution were extracted using small volume protocol (0.2 mL) and tested with Trioplex assay on the ABI7500 Fast Dx instrument ( a ) or in the QuantStudio Dx instrument ( b ). Mean genome copy equivalents per milliliter (GCE/mL) of viral RNA detected are displayed at each dilution. Error bars represent GCE/mL standard deviation. Straight line represents linear regression of MP96 platform (Roche). Dashed line represents linear regression of LC 2.0 platform (Roche)
    Figure Legend Snippet: Analytical performance comparison between MP96 and LC 2.0 RNA extraction platforms in whole blood (EDTA). A pool of whole blood donated by healthy donors was contrived with ZIKV at a dilution of 1:10 before the limit of detection (1:10 BLoD), at the limit of detection (LoD) and at 1:10 after the limit of detection (1:10 ALoD). Twenty replicas of every dilution were extracted using small volume protocol (0.2 mL) and tested with Trioplex assay on the ABI7500 Fast Dx instrument ( a ) or in the QuantStudio Dx instrument ( b ). Mean genome copy equivalents per milliliter (GCE/mL) of viral RNA detected are displayed at each dilution. Error bars represent GCE/mL standard deviation. Straight line represents linear regression of MP96 platform (Roche). Dashed line represents linear regression of LC 2.0 platform (Roche)

    Techniques Used: RNA Extraction, Standard Deviation

    4) Product Images from "Performance of the Trioplex real-time RT-PCR assay for detection of Zika, dengue, and chikungunya viruses"

    Article Title: Performance of the Trioplex real-time RT-PCR assay for detection of Zika, dengue, and chikungunya viruses

    Journal: Nature Communications

    doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03772-1

    Analytical performance comparison between MP96 and LC 2.0 RNA extraction platforms in serum and urine. a Normal human serum or b urine pooled from healthy donors was contrived with ZIKV at a dilution of 1:10 before the limit of detection (1:10 BLoD), at the limit of detection (LoD), and at 1:10 after the limit of detection (1:10 ALoD). Twenty replicates of each dilution were extracted using the small volume protocol (0.2 mL) and were tested with the Trioplex assay on the ABI7500 Fast Dx instrument. The same serum ( c ) and urine ( d ) dilutions were tested on the QuantStudio Dx instrument. Mean genome copy equivalents per milliliter (GCE/mL) of viral RNA detected are displayed at each dilution. Error bars represent GCE/mL standard deviation. Straight line represents linear regression of MP96 platform (Roche). Dashed line represents linear regression of LC 2.0 platform (Roche)
    Figure Legend Snippet: Analytical performance comparison between MP96 and LC 2.0 RNA extraction platforms in serum and urine. a Normal human serum or b urine pooled from healthy donors was contrived with ZIKV at a dilution of 1:10 before the limit of detection (1:10 BLoD), at the limit of detection (LoD), and at 1:10 after the limit of detection (1:10 ALoD). Twenty replicates of each dilution were extracted using the small volume protocol (0.2 mL) and were tested with the Trioplex assay on the ABI7500 Fast Dx instrument. The same serum ( c ) and urine ( d ) dilutions were tested on the QuantStudio Dx instrument. Mean genome copy equivalents per milliliter (GCE/mL) of viral RNA detected are displayed at each dilution. Error bars represent GCE/mL standard deviation. Straight line represents linear regression of MP96 platform (Roche). Dashed line represents linear regression of LC 2.0 platform (Roche)

    Techniques Used: RNA Extraction, Standard Deviation

    Analytical performance comparison between MP96 and LC 2.0 RNA extraction platforms in whole blood (EDTA). A pool of whole blood donated by healthy donors was contrived with ZIKV at a dilution of 1:10 before the limit of detection (1:10 BLoD), at the limit of detection (LoD) and at 1:10 after the limit of detection (1:10 ALoD). Twenty replicas of every dilution were extracted using small volume protocol (0.2 mL) and tested with Trioplex assay on the ABI7500 Fast Dx instrument ( a ) or in the QuantStudio Dx instrument ( b ). Mean genome copy equivalents per milliliter (GCE/mL) of viral RNA detected are displayed at each dilution. Error bars represent GCE/mL standard deviation. Straight line represents linear regression of MP96 platform (Roche). Dashed line represents linear regression of LC 2.0 platform (Roche)
    Figure Legend Snippet: Analytical performance comparison between MP96 and LC 2.0 RNA extraction platforms in whole blood (EDTA). A pool of whole blood donated by healthy donors was contrived with ZIKV at a dilution of 1:10 before the limit of detection (1:10 BLoD), at the limit of detection (LoD) and at 1:10 after the limit of detection (1:10 ALoD). Twenty replicas of every dilution were extracted using small volume protocol (0.2 mL) and tested with Trioplex assay on the ABI7500 Fast Dx instrument ( a ) or in the QuantStudio Dx instrument ( b ). Mean genome copy equivalents per milliliter (GCE/mL) of viral RNA detected are displayed at each dilution. Error bars represent GCE/mL standard deviation. Straight line represents linear regression of MP96 platform (Roche). Dashed line represents linear regression of LC 2.0 platform (Roche)

    Techniques Used: RNA Extraction, Standard Deviation

    Related Articles

    Polymerase Chain Reaction:

    Article Title: Genetic variations of DICKKOPF family genes might not be associated with gastric cancer susceptibility
    Article Snippet: .. PCR reaction was conducted on the Veriti® 96-Well Thermal Cycler and the QuantStudio™ Dx Real-Time PCR Instrument (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA), and the reaction condition can be referred to the previous study [ ]. .. All the primers, enzymes and TaqMan SNP genotyping assay IDs are shown in Table .

    Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction:

    Article Title: Genetic variations of DICKKOPF family genes might not be associated with gastric cancer susceptibility
    Article Snippet: .. PCR reaction was conducted on the Veriti® 96-Well Thermal Cycler and the QuantStudio™ Dx Real-Time PCR Instrument (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA), and the reaction condition can be referred to the previous study [ ]. .. All the primers, enzymes and TaqMan SNP genotyping assay IDs are shown in Table .

    Article Title: The General Transcription Repressor TaDr1 Is Co-expressed With TaVrn1 and TaFT1 in Bread Wheat Under Drought
    Article Snippet: .. Amplifluor-like SNP analysis was carried out using a QuantStudio-7 Real-Time PCR instrument (ThermoFisher Scientific, United States) as described previously ( ; ) with the following adjustment for wheat genotyping. ..

    Article Title: Identification of Grade-associated MicroRNAs in Brainstem Gliomas Based on Microarray Data
    Article Snippet: .. Quantitative real-time PCR (q-PCR) was conducted to detect the miRNA using the SYBR Premix Ex TaqTM II (Tli RNase H Plus) Kit (TaKaRa, Japan) and a QuantStudio™ Dx Real-Time PCR Instrument (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). ..

    Article Title: Targeting hepatic miR-221/222 for therapeutic intervention of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in mice
    Article Snippet: .. Quantitative PCR (qPCR) of miR-221/222 was performed using a QuantStudio Dx Real-Time instrument (Thermo Fisher) with a SYBR Premix Ex Taq Kit (Takara) using the following primers: miR-221: F: GGGAAGCTACATTGTCTGC R: CAGTGCGTGTCGTGGAGT; miR-222: F: GGGGAGCTACATCTGGCT R: TGCGTGTCGTGGAGTC and normalized to U6 (small nuclear RNA) as the endogenous control. ..

    Article Title: Integrative functional analyses using rainbow trout selected for tolerance to plant diets reveal nutrigenomic signatures for soy utilization without the concurrence of enteritis
    Article Snippet: .. Libraries were quantified by qPCR on a Real-Time PCR Instrument (QuantStudio 6 Flex, ThermoFisher Scientific) using a standard curve. .. Pooled libraries were sent for 100 bp single-read sequencing on an Illumina HiSeq 1500.

    Article Title: MicroRNA-212 facilitates the motility and invasiveness of esophageal squamous carcinoma cells
    Article Snippet: .. All qPCR reactions were run on a QuantStudio™ Dx Real-Time PCR Instrument (Applied Biosystems; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). ..

    Article Title: WIP1 Phosphatase as a Potential Therapeutic Target in Neuroblastoma
    Article Snippet: .. Assays were performed in quadruplicates using 2 ng of genomic DNA per reaction following manufacturer’s protocol (Qiagen) on a QuantStudio real time PCR instrument (Life Tech, Carlsbad, CA). .. Data was normalized to a multi-copy reference assay (VPH000-0000000A) and analyzed by the calibrator genome method (Qiagen’s software).

    Similar Products

  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 97
    Thermo Fisher quantstudio dx
    Analytical performance comparison between MP96 and LC 2.0 RNA extraction platforms in serum and urine. a Normal human serum or b urine pooled from healthy donors was contrived with ZIKV at a dilution of 1:10 before the limit of detection (1:10 BLoD), at the limit of detection (LoD), and at 1:10 after the limit of detection (1:10 ALoD). Twenty replicates of each dilution were extracted using the small volume protocol (0.2 mL) and were tested with the Trioplex assay on the ABI7500 Fast Dx instrument. The same serum ( c ) and urine ( d ) dilutions were tested on the <t>QuantStudio</t> Dx instrument. Mean genome copy equivalents per milliliter (GCE/mL) of viral RNA detected are displayed at each dilution. Error bars represent GCE/mL standard deviation. Straight line represents linear regression of MP96 platform (Roche). Dashed line represents linear regression of LC 2.0 platform (Roche)
    Quantstudio Dx, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 5 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/quantstudio dx/product/Thermo Fisher
    Average 97 stars, based on 5 article reviews
    Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
    quantstudio dx - by Bioz Stars, 2020-05
    97/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Analytical performance comparison between MP96 and LC 2.0 RNA extraction platforms in serum and urine. a Normal human serum or b urine pooled from healthy donors was contrived with ZIKV at a dilution of 1:10 before the limit of detection (1:10 BLoD), at the limit of detection (LoD), and at 1:10 after the limit of detection (1:10 ALoD). Twenty replicates of each dilution were extracted using the small volume protocol (0.2 mL) and were tested with the Trioplex assay on the ABI7500 Fast Dx instrument. The same serum ( c ) and urine ( d ) dilutions were tested on the QuantStudio Dx instrument. Mean genome copy equivalents per milliliter (GCE/mL) of viral RNA detected are displayed at each dilution. Error bars represent GCE/mL standard deviation. Straight line represents linear regression of MP96 platform (Roche). Dashed line represents linear regression of LC 2.0 platform (Roche)

    Journal: Nature Communications

    Article Title: Performance of the Trioplex real-time RT-PCR assay for detection of Zika, dengue, and chikungunya viruses

    doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03772-1

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Analytical performance comparison between MP96 and LC 2.0 RNA extraction platforms in serum and urine. a Normal human serum or b urine pooled from healthy donors was contrived with ZIKV at a dilution of 1:10 before the limit of detection (1:10 BLoD), at the limit of detection (LoD), and at 1:10 after the limit of detection (1:10 ALoD). Twenty replicates of each dilution were extracted using the small volume protocol (0.2 mL) and were tested with the Trioplex assay on the ABI7500 Fast Dx instrument. The same serum ( c ) and urine ( d ) dilutions were tested on the QuantStudio Dx instrument. Mean genome copy equivalents per milliliter (GCE/mL) of viral RNA detected are displayed at each dilution. Error bars represent GCE/mL standard deviation. Straight line represents linear regression of MP96 platform (Roche). Dashed line represents linear regression of LC 2.0 platform (Roche)

    Article Snippet: Standard curves were generated and tested with the Trioplex real-time RT-PCR assay on each qPCR instrument, ABI 7500 Fast Dx (ThermoFisher), and QuantStudio Dx (ThermoFisher).

    Techniques: RNA Extraction, Standard Deviation

    Analytical performance comparison between MP96 and LC 2.0 RNA extraction platforms in whole blood (EDTA). A pool of whole blood donated by healthy donors was contrived with ZIKV at a dilution of 1:10 before the limit of detection (1:10 BLoD), at the limit of detection (LoD) and at 1:10 after the limit of detection (1:10 ALoD). Twenty replicas of every dilution were extracted using small volume protocol (0.2 mL) and tested with Trioplex assay on the ABI7500 Fast Dx instrument ( a ) or in the QuantStudio Dx instrument ( b ). Mean genome copy equivalents per milliliter (GCE/mL) of viral RNA detected are displayed at each dilution. Error bars represent GCE/mL standard deviation. Straight line represents linear regression of MP96 platform (Roche). Dashed line represents linear regression of LC 2.0 platform (Roche)

    Journal: Nature Communications

    Article Title: Performance of the Trioplex real-time RT-PCR assay for detection of Zika, dengue, and chikungunya viruses

    doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03772-1

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Analytical performance comparison between MP96 and LC 2.0 RNA extraction platforms in whole blood (EDTA). A pool of whole blood donated by healthy donors was contrived with ZIKV at a dilution of 1:10 before the limit of detection (1:10 BLoD), at the limit of detection (LoD) and at 1:10 after the limit of detection (1:10 ALoD). Twenty replicas of every dilution were extracted using small volume protocol (0.2 mL) and tested with Trioplex assay on the ABI7500 Fast Dx instrument ( a ) or in the QuantStudio Dx instrument ( b ). Mean genome copy equivalents per milliliter (GCE/mL) of viral RNA detected are displayed at each dilution. Error bars represent GCE/mL standard deviation. Straight line represents linear regression of MP96 platform (Roche). Dashed line represents linear regression of LC 2.0 platform (Roche)

    Article Snippet: Standard curves were generated and tested with the Trioplex real-time RT-PCR assay on each qPCR instrument, ABI 7500 Fast Dx (ThermoFisher), and QuantStudio Dx (ThermoFisher).

    Techniques: RNA Extraction, Standard Deviation

    Analytical performance comparison between MP96 and LC 2.0 RNA extraction platforms in serum and urine. a Normal human serum or b urine pooled from healthy donors was contrived with ZIKV at a dilution of 1:10 before the limit of detection (1:10 BLoD), at the limit of detection (LoD), and at 1:10 after the limit of detection (1:10 ALoD). Twenty replicates of each dilution were extracted using the small volume protocol (0.2 mL) and were tested with the Trioplex assay on the ABI7500 Fast Dx instrument. The same serum ( c ) and urine ( d ) dilutions were tested on the QuantStudio Dx instrument. Mean genome copy equivalents per milliliter (GCE/mL) of viral RNA detected are displayed at each dilution. Error bars represent GCE/mL standard deviation. Straight line represents linear regression of MP96 platform (Roche). Dashed line represents linear regression of LC 2.0 platform (Roche)

    Journal: Nature Communications

    Article Title: Performance of the Trioplex real-time RT-PCR assay for detection of Zika, dengue, and chikungunya viruses

    doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03772-1

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Analytical performance comparison between MP96 and LC 2.0 RNA extraction platforms in serum and urine. a Normal human serum or b urine pooled from healthy donors was contrived with ZIKV at a dilution of 1:10 before the limit of detection (1:10 BLoD), at the limit of detection (LoD), and at 1:10 after the limit of detection (1:10 ALoD). Twenty replicates of each dilution were extracted using the small volume protocol (0.2 mL) and were tested with the Trioplex assay on the ABI7500 Fast Dx instrument. The same serum ( c ) and urine ( d ) dilutions were tested on the QuantStudio Dx instrument. Mean genome copy equivalents per milliliter (GCE/mL) of viral RNA detected are displayed at each dilution. Error bars represent GCE/mL standard deviation. Straight line represents linear regression of MP96 platform (Roche). Dashed line represents linear regression of LC 2.0 platform (Roche)

    Article Snippet: The fluorophore-labeled hydrolysis probes bind to the amplified DNA target fragment and the intensity of the fluorescent signal is captured by a real-time PCR instrument: (ABI 7500 fast Dx (ThermoFisher) or QuantStudio Dx (ThermoFisher)).

    Techniques: RNA Extraction, Standard Deviation

    Analytical performance comparison between Trioplex assay multiplex and the ZIKV singleplex format assay using small volume and large volume RNA extraction. Normal human serum or urine was contrived with ZIKV at a dilution of 1:10 before the limit of detection (1:10 BLoD), at the limit of detection (LoD), and at 1:10 after the limit of detection (1:10 ALoD). Twenty replicates of every dilution were extracted using the MagNA Pure 96 instrument (Roche) and tested by Trioplex assay multiplex or ZIKV singleplex format assay on the ABI 7500 Fast Dx or the QuantStudio Dx instruments. a Compares the mean genome copy equivalents per PCR reaction (GCE/rxn) of viral RNA extracted from serum at each dilution on the ABI 7500 Fast Dx instrument. A linear regression was plotted for multiplex with small volume protocol (Sv) (0.2 mL) (black straight line), singleplex assay with small volume protocol (gray straight line), multiplex with large volume protocol (Lv) (1 mL) (black dashed line). and singleplex assay with large volume protocol (gray dashed line). b Compares the mean genome copy equivalents per PCR reaction (GCE/rxn) of viral RNA extracted from serum or urine at each dilution on the QuantStudio Dx instrument. A linear regression was plotted for multiplex with small volume protocol serum (Sv) (black straight line), multiplex with large volume protocol serum (Lv) (gray straight line), multiplex with small volume protocol urine (Lv) (black dashed line), and multiplex with large volume protocol urine (gray dashed line). Error bars represent GCE/mL standard deviation. The CT values for every dilution replicate in serum tested was plotted for c small volume and d large volume extractions

    Journal: Nature Communications

    Article Title: Performance of the Trioplex real-time RT-PCR assay for detection of Zika, dengue, and chikungunya viruses

    doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03772-1

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Analytical performance comparison between Trioplex assay multiplex and the ZIKV singleplex format assay using small volume and large volume RNA extraction. Normal human serum or urine was contrived with ZIKV at a dilution of 1:10 before the limit of detection (1:10 BLoD), at the limit of detection (LoD), and at 1:10 after the limit of detection (1:10 ALoD). Twenty replicates of every dilution were extracted using the MagNA Pure 96 instrument (Roche) and tested by Trioplex assay multiplex or ZIKV singleplex format assay on the ABI 7500 Fast Dx or the QuantStudio Dx instruments. a Compares the mean genome copy equivalents per PCR reaction (GCE/rxn) of viral RNA extracted from serum at each dilution on the ABI 7500 Fast Dx instrument. A linear regression was plotted for multiplex with small volume protocol (Sv) (0.2 mL) (black straight line), singleplex assay with small volume protocol (gray straight line), multiplex with large volume protocol (Lv) (1 mL) (black dashed line). and singleplex assay with large volume protocol (gray dashed line). b Compares the mean genome copy equivalents per PCR reaction (GCE/rxn) of viral RNA extracted from serum or urine at each dilution on the QuantStudio Dx instrument. A linear regression was plotted for multiplex with small volume protocol serum (Sv) (black straight line), multiplex with large volume protocol serum (Lv) (gray straight line), multiplex with small volume protocol urine (Lv) (black dashed line), and multiplex with large volume protocol urine (gray dashed line). Error bars represent GCE/mL standard deviation. The CT values for every dilution replicate in serum tested was plotted for c small volume and d large volume extractions

    Article Snippet: The fluorophore-labeled hydrolysis probes bind to the amplified DNA target fragment and the intensity of the fluorescent signal is captured by a real-time PCR instrument: (ABI 7500 fast Dx (ThermoFisher) or QuantStudio Dx (ThermoFisher)).

    Techniques: Multiplex Assay, RNA Extraction, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Singleplex Assay, Standard Deviation

    Analytical performance comparison between MP96 and LC 2.0 RNA extraction platforms in whole blood (EDTA). A pool of whole blood donated by healthy donors was contrived with ZIKV at a dilution of 1:10 before the limit of detection (1:10 BLoD), at the limit of detection (LoD) and at 1:10 after the limit of detection (1:10 ALoD). Twenty replicas of every dilution were extracted using small volume protocol (0.2 mL) and tested with Trioplex assay on the ABI7500 Fast Dx instrument ( a ) or in the QuantStudio Dx instrument ( b ). Mean genome copy equivalents per milliliter (GCE/mL) of viral RNA detected are displayed at each dilution. Error bars represent GCE/mL standard deviation. Straight line represents linear regression of MP96 platform (Roche). Dashed line represents linear regression of LC 2.0 platform (Roche)

    Journal: Nature Communications

    Article Title: Performance of the Trioplex real-time RT-PCR assay for detection of Zika, dengue, and chikungunya viruses

    doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03772-1

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Analytical performance comparison between MP96 and LC 2.0 RNA extraction platforms in whole blood (EDTA). A pool of whole blood donated by healthy donors was contrived with ZIKV at a dilution of 1:10 before the limit of detection (1:10 BLoD), at the limit of detection (LoD) and at 1:10 after the limit of detection (1:10 ALoD). Twenty replicas of every dilution were extracted using small volume protocol (0.2 mL) and tested with Trioplex assay on the ABI7500 Fast Dx instrument ( a ) or in the QuantStudio Dx instrument ( b ). Mean genome copy equivalents per milliliter (GCE/mL) of viral RNA detected are displayed at each dilution. Error bars represent GCE/mL standard deviation. Straight line represents linear regression of MP96 platform (Roche). Dashed line represents linear regression of LC 2.0 platform (Roche)

    Article Snippet: The fluorophore-labeled hydrolysis probes bind to the amplified DNA target fragment and the intensity of the fluorescent signal is captured by a real-time PCR instrument: (ABI 7500 fast Dx (ThermoFisher) or QuantStudio Dx (ThermoFisher)).

    Techniques: RNA Extraction, Standard Deviation