Review





Similar Products

proteome  (ATCC)
97
ATCC proteome
A ) Venn diagram of unique proteins identified in the in vitro cellular <t>proteome</t> (purple; 2767 proteins) and secretome (blue; 18 proteins) with 25 proteins commonly detected. B) Egg diagram of proteins identified from the host, Mus musculus (4,952 after valid value filtering), and pathogen, <t>Cryptococcus</t> <t>neoformans</t> (874 after valid value filtering) from infectome analysis. C) Principal component analysis of infectome experiment. D) Volcano plot for comparison of host proteins with significant differences in abundance between infected (teal) and uninfected (grey) conditions. Student’s t test, P < 0.05; FDR = 0.05; S 0 = 1. E) Comparison of significantly different fungal proteins identified from the in vitro cellular proteome compared to the infectome. F) Comparison of significantly different fungal proteins identified from the in vitro secretome compared to the infectome. Red lines represent 0-, 4-, and 16-fold change in protein abundance. G) Pie chart based on GOBP for 53 fungal infection-associated protein (percentage of each category represented). Experiment completed in biological triplicate.
Proteome, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/proteome/product/ATCC
Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
proteome - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
97/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
atcc 367 reference proteome  (ATCC)
97
ATCC atcc 367 reference proteome
A ) Venn diagram of unique proteins identified in the in vitro cellular <t>proteome</t> (purple; 2767 proteins) and secretome (blue; 18 proteins) with 25 proteins commonly detected. B) Egg diagram of proteins identified from the host, Mus musculus (4,952 after valid value filtering), and pathogen, <t>Cryptococcus</t> <t>neoformans</t> (874 after valid value filtering) from infectome analysis. C) Principal component analysis of infectome experiment. D) Volcano plot for comparison of host proteins with significant differences in abundance between infected (teal) and uninfected (grey) conditions. Student’s t test, P < 0.05; FDR = 0.05; S 0 = 1. E) Comparison of significantly different fungal proteins identified from the in vitro cellular proteome compared to the infectome. F) Comparison of significantly different fungal proteins identified from the in vitro secretome compared to the infectome. Red lines represent 0-, 4-, and 16-fold change in protein abundance. G) Pie chart based on GOBP for 53 fungal infection-associated protein (percentage of each category represented). Experiment completed in biological triplicate.
Atcc 367 Reference Proteome, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/atcc 367 reference proteome/product/ATCC
Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
atcc 367 reference proteome - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
97/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
proteome discoverer 1.4  (Thermo Fisher)
90
Thermo Fisher proteome discoverer 1.4
A ) Venn diagram of unique proteins identified in the in vitro cellular <t>proteome</t> (purple; 2767 proteins) and secretome (blue; 18 proteins) with 25 proteins commonly detected. B) Egg diagram of proteins identified from the host, Mus musculus (4,952 after valid value filtering), and pathogen, <t>Cryptococcus</t> <t>neoformans</t> (874 after valid value filtering) from infectome analysis. C) Principal component analysis of infectome experiment. D) Volcano plot for comparison of host proteins with significant differences in abundance between infected (teal) and uninfected (grey) conditions. Student’s t test, P < 0.05; FDR = 0.05; S 0 = 1. E) Comparison of significantly different fungal proteins identified from the in vitro cellular proteome compared to the infectome. F) Comparison of significantly different fungal proteins identified from the in vitro secretome compared to the infectome. Red lines represent 0-, 4-, and 16-fold change in protein abundance. G) Pie chart based on GOBP for 53 fungal infection-associated protein (percentage of each category represented). Experiment completed in biological triplicate.
Proteome Discoverer 1.4, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/proteome discoverer 1.4/product/Thermo Fisher
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
proteome discoverer 1.4 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
proteome profiler human xl cytokine array kit  (R&D Systems)
96
R&D Systems proteome profiler human xl cytokine array kit
A ) Venn diagram of unique proteins identified in the in vitro cellular <t>proteome</t> (purple; 2767 proteins) and secretome (blue; 18 proteins) with 25 proteins commonly detected. B) Egg diagram of proteins identified from the host, Mus musculus (4,952 after valid value filtering), and pathogen, <t>Cryptococcus</t> <t>neoformans</t> (874 after valid value filtering) from infectome analysis. C) Principal component analysis of infectome experiment. D) Volcano plot for comparison of host proteins with significant differences in abundance between infected (teal) and uninfected (grey) conditions. Student’s t test, P < 0.05; FDR = 0.05; S 0 = 1. E) Comparison of significantly different fungal proteins identified from the in vitro cellular proteome compared to the infectome. F) Comparison of significantly different fungal proteins identified from the in vitro secretome compared to the infectome. Red lines represent 0-, 4-, and 16-fold change in protein abundance. G) Pie chart based on GOBP for 53 fungal infection-associated protein (percentage of each category represented). Experiment completed in biological triplicate.
Proteome Profiler Human Xl Cytokine Array Kit, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/proteome profiler human xl cytokine array kit/product/R&D Systems
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
proteome profiler human xl cytokine array kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
yeast proteome reference  (ATCC)
96
ATCC yeast proteome reference
A ) Venn diagram of unique proteins identified in the in vitro cellular <t>proteome</t> (purple; 2767 proteins) and secretome (blue; 18 proteins) with 25 proteins commonly detected. B) Egg diagram of proteins identified from the host, Mus musculus (4,952 after valid value filtering), and pathogen, <t>Cryptococcus</t> <t>neoformans</t> (874 after valid value filtering) from infectome analysis. C) Principal component analysis of infectome experiment. D) Volcano plot for comparison of host proteins with significant differences in abundance between infected (teal) and uninfected (grey) conditions. Student’s t test, P < 0.05; FDR = 0.05; S 0 = 1. E) Comparison of significantly different fungal proteins identified from the in vitro cellular proteome compared to the infectome. F) Comparison of significantly different fungal proteins identified from the in vitro secretome compared to the infectome. Red lines represent 0-, 4-, and 16-fold change in protein abundance. G) Pie chart based on GOBP for 53 fungal infection-associated protein (percentage of each category represented). Experiment completed in biological triplicate.
Yeast Proteome Reference, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/yeast proteome reference/product/ATCC
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
yeast proteome reference - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
proteome sequence fasta files  (ATCC)
97
ATCC proteome sequence fasta files
A ) Venn diagram of unique proteins identified in the in vitro cellular <t>proteome</t> (purple; 2767 proteins) and secretome (blue; 18 proteins) with 25 proteins commonly detected. B) Egg diagram of proteins identified from the host, Mus musculus (4,952 after valid value filtering), and pathogen, <t>Cryptococcus</t> <t>neoformans</t> (874 after valid value filtering) from infectome analysis. C) Principal component analysis of infectome experiment. D) Volcano plot for comparison of host proteins with significant differences in abundance between infected (teal) and uninfected (grey) conditions. Student’s t test, P < 0.05; FDR = 0.05; S 0 = 1. E) Comparison of significantly different fungal proteins identified from the in vitro cellular proteome compared to the infectome. F) Comparison of significantly different fungal proteins identified from the in vitro secretome compared to the infectome. Red lines represent 0-, 4-, and 16-fold change in protein abundance. G) Pie chart based on GOBP for 53 fungal infection-associated protein (percentage of each category represented). Experiment completed in biological triplicate.
Proteome Sequence Fasta Files, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/proteome sequence fasta files/product/ATCC
Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
proteome sequence fasta files - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
97/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
clinical proteomics technologies for cancer  (Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank)
94
Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank clinical proteomics technologies for cancer
A ) Venn diagram of unique proteins identified in the in vitro cellular <t>proteome</t> (purple; 2767 proteins) and secretome (blue; 18 proteins) with 25 proteins commonly detected. B) Egg diagram of proteins identified from the host, Mus musculus (4,952 after valid value filtering), and pathogen, <t>Cryptococcus</t> <t>neoformans</t> (874 after valid value filtering) from infectome analysis. C) Principal component analysis of infectome experiment. D) Volcano plot for comparison of host proteins with significant differences in abundance between infected (teal) and uninfected (grey) conditions. Student’s t test, P < 0.05; FDR = 0.05; S 0 = 1. E) Comparison of significantly different fungal proteins identified from the in vitro cellular proteome compared to the infectome. F) Comparison of significantly different fungal proteins identified from the in vitro secretome compared to the infectome. Red lines represent 0-, 4-, and 16-fold change in protein abundance. G) Pie chart based on GOBP for 53 fungal infection-associated protein (percentage of each category represented). Experiment completed in biological triplicate.
Clinical Proteomics Technologies For Cancer, supplied by Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/clinical proteomics technologies for cancer/product/Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
clinical proteomics technologies for cancer - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
proteomic grade trypsin  (Thermo Fisher)
99
Thermo Fisher proteomic grade trypsin
A ) Venn diagram of unique proteins identified in the in vitro cellular <t>proteome</t> (purple; 2767 proteins) and secretome (blue; 18 proteins) with 25 proteins commonly detected. B) Egg diagram of proteins identified from the host, Mus musculus (4,952 after valid value filtering), and pathogen, <t>Cryptococcus</t> <t>neoformans</t> (874 after valid value filtering) from infectome analysis. C) Principal component analysis of infectome experiment. D) Volcano plot for comparison of host proteins with significant differences in abundance between infected (teal) and uninfected (grey) conditions. Student’s t test, P < 0.05; FDR = 0.05; S 0 = 1. E) Comparison of significantly different fungal proteins identified from the in vitro cellular proteome compared to the infectome. F) Comparison of significantly different fungal proteins identified from the in vitro secretome compared to the infectome. Red lines represent 0-, 4-, and 16-fold change in protein abundance. G) Pie chart based on GOBP for 53 fungal infection-associated protein (percentage of each category represented). Experiment completed in biological triplicate.
Proteomic Grade Trypsin, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/proteomic grade trypsin/product/Thermo Fisher
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
proteomic grade trypsin - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


A ) Venn diagram of unique proteins identified in the in vitro cellular proteome (purple; 2767 proteins) and secretome (blue; 18 proteins) with 25 proteins commonly detected. B) Egg diagram of proteins identified from the host, Mus musculus (4,952 after valid value filtering), and pathogen, Cryptococcus neoformans (874 after valid value filtering) from infectome analysis. C) Principal component analysis of infectome experiment. D) Volcano plot for comparison of host proteins with significant differences in abundance between infected (teal) and uninfected (grey) conditions. Student’s t test, P < 0.05; FDR = 0.05; S 0 = 1. E) Comparison of significantly different fungal proteins identified from the in vitro cellular proteome compared to the infectome. F) Comparison of significantly different fungal proteins identified from the in vitro secretome compared to the infectome. Red lines represent 0-, 4-, and 16-fold change in protein abundance. G) Pie chart based on GOBP for 53 fungal infection-associated protein (percentage of each category represented). Experiment completed in biological triplicate.

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: Systematic Infectome–Phenome Profiling Reveals Cryptococcal Infection-Associated Proteins Driving Immune System Remodeling and Immunization Potential

doi: 10.64898/2026.01.30.702846

Figure Lengend Snippet: A ) Venn diagram of unique proteins identified in the in vitro cellular proteome (purple; 2767 proteins) and secretome (blue; 18 proteins) with 25 proteins commonly detected. B) Egg diagram of proteins identified from the host, Mus musculus (4,952 after valid value filtering), and pathogen, Cryptococcus neoformans (874 after valid value filtering) from infectome analysis. C) Principal component analysis of infectome experiment. D) Volcano plot for comparison of host proteins with significant differences in abundance between infected (teal) and uninfected (grey) conditions. Student’s t test, P < 0.05; FDR = 0.05; S 0 = 1. E) Comparison of significantly different fungal proteins identified from the in vitro cellular proteome compared to the infectome. F) Comparison of significantly different fungal proteins identified from the in vitro secretome compared to the infectome. Red lines represent 0-, 4-, and 16-fold change in protein abundance. G) Pie chart based on GOBP for 53 fungal infection-associated protein (percentage of each category represented). Experiment completed in biological triplicate.

Article Snippet: The derived peak list was incorporated with the Andromeda search engine against the reference C. neoformans var. grubii serotype A (strain H99/ATCC 208821) proteome (7430 sequences; Oct. 2018) and Mus musculus (55,462 sequences; Oct 2018) from Uniprot .

Techniques: In Vitro, Comparison, Infection, Quantitative Proteomics