p cdk1 t14  (Cell Signaling Technology Inc)


Bioz Verified Symbol Cell Signaling Technology Inc is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Cell Signaling Technology Inc manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 94

    Structured Review

    Cell Signaling Technology Inc p cdk1 t14
    ( A ) In vitro <t>CDK1</t> activity (top2 plots) was analyzed in EOC cells with or without ODF2L knockdown and then treated with DMSO or AZD1775 (treatment: DMSO/200 nM AZD1775, 4 hours). ( B ) Immunoblots of the <t>T14</t> and Y15 phosphorylation status of CDK1 in the indicated EOC cells (treatment: DMSO/200 nM AZD1775, 24 hours). ( C and D ) In vitro CDK1 activity (top 2 plots) was analyzed in CDK1 T14A–expressing ( C ), CDK1 Y15F–expressing ( D ), and CDK1 WT–expressing ( C and D ) EOC cells with endogenous CDK1 removed (treatment: DMSO or 200 nM AZD1775 for 4 hours). ( E and F ) Representative images and quantification of colony formation ( E ) and apoptotic cell death ( F ) of EOC cells with or without ODF2L knockdown. Cells were treated with sublethal doses of AZD1775 (A2780, 200 nM; SKOV3, 200 nM) together with or without 5 μM Ro-3306 for 72 hours. Data are the mean ± SD from 3 technical replicates of each sample and are representative of 3 ( A ), 2 ( B ), and 3 ( C – F ) independent biological experiments. Blots shown were run in parallel, contemporaneously using the same cell lysate harvested from 1 representative experiment for each cell line in A – D . *** P < 0.001 and **** P < 0.0001, by 1-way ANOVA.
    P Cdk1 T14, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/p cdk1 t14/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
    p cdk1 t14 - by Bioz Stars, 2023-03
    94/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "ODF2L acts as a synthetic lethal partner with WEE1 inhibition in epithelial ovarian cancer models"

    Article Title: ODF2L acts as a synthetic lethal partner with WEE1 inhibition in epithelial ovarian cancer models

    Journal: The Journal of Clinical Investigation

    doi: 10.1172/JCI161544

    ( A ) In vitro CDK1 activity (top2 plots) was analyzed in EOC cells with or without ODF2L knockdown and then treated with DMSO or AZD1775 (treatment: DMSO/200 nM AZD1775, 4 hours). ( B ) Immunoblots of the T14 and Y15 phosphorylation status of CDK1 in the indicated EOC cells (treatment: DMSO/200 nM AZD1775, 24 hours). ( C and D ) In vitro CDK1 activity (top 2 plots) was analyzed in CDK1 T14A–expressing ( C ), CDK1 Y15F–expressing ( D ), and CDK1 WT–expressing ( C and D ) EOC cells with endogenous CDK1 removed (treatment: DMSO or 200 nM AZD1775 for 4 hours). ( E and F ) Representative images and quantification of colony formation ( E ) and apoptotic cell death ( F ) of EOC cells with or without ODF2L knockdown. Cells were treated with sublethal doses of AZD1775 (A2780, 200 nM; SKOV3, 200 nM) together with or without 5 μM Ro-3306 for 72 hours. Data are the mean ± SD from 3 technical replicates of each sample and are representative of 3 ( A ), 2 ( B ), and 3 ( C – F ) independent biological experiments. Blots shown were run in parallel, contemporaneously using the same cell lysate harvested from 1 representative experiment for each cell line in A – D . *** P < 0.001 and **** P < 0.0001, by 1-way ANOVA.
    Figure Legend Snippet: ( A ) In vitro CDK1 activity (top2 plots) was analyzed in EOC cells with or without ODF2L knockdown and then treated with DMSO or AZD1775 (treatment: DMSO/200 nM AZD1775, 4 hours). ( B ) Immunoblots of the T14 and Y15 phosphorylation status of CDK1 in the indicated EOC cells (treatment: DMSO/200 nM AZD1775, 24 hours). ( C and D ) In vitro CDK1 activity (top 2 plots) was analyzed in CDK1 T14A–expressing ( C ), CDK1 Y15F–expressing ( D ), and CDK1 WT–expressing ( C and D ) EOC cells with endogenous CDK1 removed (treatment: DMSO or 200 nM AZD1775 for 4 hours). ( E and F ) Representative images and quantification of colony formation ( E ) and apoptotic cell death ( F ) of EOC cells with or without ODF2L knockdown. Cells were treated with sublethal doses of AZD1775 (A2780, 200 nM; SKOV3, 200 nM) together with or without 5 μM Ro-3306 for 72 hours. Data are the mean ± SD from 3 technical replicates of each sample and are representative of 3 ( A ), 2 ( B ), and 3 ( C – F ) independent biological experiments. Blots shown were run in parallel, contemporaneously using the same cell lysate harvested from 1 representative experiment for each cell line in A – D . *** P < 0.001 and **** P < 0.0001, by 1-way ANOVA.

    Techniques Used: In Vitro, Activity Assay, Western Blot, Expressing

    ( A ) Analysis of correlations between CDK1 expression levels and those of WEE1, PKMYT1, and ODF2L using TCGA OV data. ( B ) Analysis of the endogenous interaction between ODF2L and PKMYT1 by reverse coimmunoprecipitation followed by immunoblotting. ( C and D ) Analysis of the interaction between CDK1 and PKMYT1 in ODF2L-knockdown EOC cells ( C ) and the interaction between CDK1 and ODF2L in PKMYT1 knockdown EOC cells ( D ) by immunoprecipitation of endogenous CDK1 followed by immunoblotting. ( E ) BRET assay for the binding of PKMYT1 and CDK1 (plasmid design strategy is shown on left) measured in the indicated cells transfected with Halo-tagged CDK1 and Nluc-tagged PKMYT1 in the absence or presence of ODF2L. ( F ) Analysis of the binding of CDK1 and PKMYT1 to the C-terminally, middle-range, and N-terminally truncated ODF2L by coimmunoprecipitation. The indicated cells were cotransfected with Myc-PKMYT1, CDK1-V5, or Flag-tagged truncated ODF2L domains. ( G and H ) Analysis of cell viability upon AZD1775 treatment with or without ODF2L knockdown upon overexpression of PKMYT1 ( G ) or knockdown of PKMYT1 ( H ). AZD1775 (A2780, 200 nM; SKOV3, 200 nM). Data are the mean ± SD from 3 technical replicates in E , G , and H . Data are representative of 2 ( B ), 2 ( C ), 2 ( D ), 3 ( E ), 2 ( F ), 2 ( G ), and 2 ( H ) independent biological experiments. Blots shown were run in parallel, contemporaneously using the same cell lysate harvested from 1 representative experiment for each cell line in H . ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, and **** P < 0.0001, by 1-way ANOVA.
    Figure Legend Snippet: ( A ) Analysis of correlations between CDK1 expression levels and those of WEE1, PKMYT1, and ODF2L using TCGA OV data. ( B ) Analysis of the endogenous interaction between ODF2L and PKMYT1 by reverse coimmunoprecipitation followed by immunoblotting. ( C and D ) Analysis of the interaction between CDK1 and PKMYT1 in ODF2L-knockdown EOC cells ( C ) and the interaction between CDK1 and ODF2L in PKMYT1 knockdown EOC cells ( D ) by immunoprecipitation of endogenous CDK1 followed by immunoblotting. ( E ) BRET assay for the binding of PKMYT1 and CDK1 (plasmid design strategy is shown on left) measured in the indicated cells transfected with Halo-tagged CDK1 and Nluc-tagged PKMYT1 in the absence or presence of ODF2L. ( F ) Analysis of the binding of CDK1 and PKMYT1 to the C-terminally, middle-range, and N-terminally truncated ODF2L by coimmunoprecipitation. The indicated cells were cotransfected with Myc-PKMYT1, CDK1-V5, or Flag-tagged truncated ODF2L domains. ( G and H ) Analysis of cell viability upon AZD1775 treatment with or without ODF2L knockdown upon overexpression of PKMYT1 ( G ) or knockdown of PKMYT1 ( H ). AZD1775 (A2780, 200 nM; SKOV3, 200 nM). Data are the mean ± SD from 3 technical replicates in E , G , and H . Data are representative of 2 ( B ), 2 ( C ), 2 ( D ), 3 ( E ), 2 ( F ), 2 ( G ), and 2 ( H ) independent biological experiments. Blots shown were run in parallel, contemporaneously using the same cell lysate harvested from 1 representative experiment for each cell line in H . ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, and **** P < 0.0001, by 1-way ANOVA.

    Techniques Used: Expressing, Western Blot, Immunoprecipitation, Bioluminescence Resonance Energy Transfer, Binding Assay, Plasmid Preparation, Transfection, Over Expression

    ( A and B ) In vitro CDK1 activity, total ODF2L expression levels ( A ) and cell viability ( B ) were analyzed in AZD1775-treated EOC cells derived from the primary tumor tissue of 57 ovarian cancer patients. Patient 1 was used as a control for different batches and labeled blue. ( C and D ) Analysis of correlations between ODF2L expression levels and CDK1 activity ( C ) or cell viability ( D ) in AZD1775-treated primary EOC cells. ODF2L expression levels and CDK1 activity were measured by quantification of the blots in A using ImageJ software. ( E ) Effect of ODF2L expression levels on in vivo tumor growth of PDXs treated with AZD1775. Tumor tissue from patients 1, 5, and 10; patients 3 and 21; and patients 33 and 36 were chosen for the xenograft on the basis of the differential expression levels of ODF2L in the primary cells confirmed by Western blotting. Mice were evenly grouped when the volume of their tumors reached approximately 100 mm 3 25 days after xenografting and were treated with vehicle or AZD1775 (40 mg/kg, orally, once per day). ID, identification. Data are representative of 2 ( A ) and 3 ( B ) independent biological experiments and represent the mean ± SD of 3 technical replicates of each sample ( B ). Error bars in E represent the SEM for tumor volume ( n = 6). ** P < 0.01 and *** P < 0.0001, by 2-tailed Pearson’s correlation coefficient ( C and D ), 2-way ANOVA for tumor volume ( E ), and 1-way ANOVA for tumor weight ( F ).
    Figure Legend Snippet: ( A and B ) In vitro CDK1 activity, total ODF2L expression levels ( A ) and cell viability ( B ) were analyzed in AZD1775-treated EOC cells derived from the primary tumor tissue of 57 ovarian cancer patients. Patient 1 was used as a control for different batches and labeled blue. ( C and D ) Analysis of correlations between ODF2L expression levels and CDK1 activity ( C ) or cell viability ( D ) in AZD1775-treated primary EOC cells. ODF2L expression levels and CDK1 activity were measured by quantification of the blots in A using ImageJ software. ( E ) Effect of ODF2L expression levels on in vivo tumor growth of PDXs treated with AZD1775. Tumor tissue from patients 1, 5, and 10; patients 3 and 21; and patients 33 and 36 were chosen for the xenograft on the basis of the differential expression levels of ODF2L in the primary cells confirmed by Western blotting. Mice were evenly grouped when the volume of their tumors reached approximately 100 mm 3 25 days after xenografting and were treated with vehicle or AZD1775 (40 mg/kg, orally, once per day). ID, identification. Data are representative of 2 ( A ) and 3 ( B ) independent biological experiments and represent the mean ± SD of 3 technical replicates of each sample ( B ). Error bars in E represent the SEM for tumor volume ( n = 6). ** P < 0.01 and *** P < 0.0001, by 2-tailed Pearson’s correlation coefficient ( C and D ), 2-way ANOVA for tumor volume ( E ), and 1-way ANOVA for tumor weight ( F ).

    Techniques Used: In Vitro, Activity Assay, Expressing, Derivative Assay, Labeling, Software, In Vivo, Western Blot

    ( A ) Schematic illustration of targeted LNP against ovarian ID8 cells using the ASSET platform (upper panel) and experimental design (lower panel). ( B and C ) Effect of combination treatment with siODF2L-LNP and AZD1775 on ID8 tumor growth. In vivo bioluminescence image ( B ) and average photonic flux ( C ) at week 7. LNPs (0.75 mg/kg, twice a week); AZD1775 (30 mg/kg, orally, once per day). n = 10. ( D ) Survival curves of ID8-bearing mice in the indicated groups. n = 10. ( E ) Quantification of peritoneal ID8 tumor nodule numbers in mice at the endpoint. ( F and G ) In vitro CDK1 activity and total ODF2L expression levels were analyzed by Western blotting ( F ), and the level of the DNA damage marker γH2AX was analyzed ( G ) by flow cytometry in the 2 or 3 ID8 tumors harvested from mice in each group at the endpoint. Data represent the mean ± SD; n = 10 ( B – E ). Data are the mean ± SD; n = 2 or n = 3 ( G ). Data are representative of 2 ( F ) and 3 ( G ) independent biological experiments. ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, and **** P < 0.0001, by 1-way ANOVA.
    Figure Legend Snippet: ( A ) Schematic illustration of targeted LNP against ovarian ID8 cells using the ASSET platform (upper panel) and experimental design (lower panel). ( B and C ) Effect of combination treatment with siODF2L-LNP and AZD1775 on ID8 tumor growth. In vivo bioluminescence image ( B ) and average photonic flux ( C ) at week 7. LNPs (0.75 mg/kg, twice a week); AZD1775 (30 mg/kg, orally, once per day). n = 10. ( D ) Survival curves of ID8-bearing mice in the indicated groups. n = 10. ( E ) Quantification of peritoneal ID8 tumor nodule numbers in mice at the endpoint. ( F and G ) In vitro CDK1 activity and total ODF2L expression levels were analyzed by Western blotting ( F ), and the level of the DNA damage marker γH2AX was analyzed ( G ) by flow cytometry in the 2 or 3 ID8 tumors harvested from mice in each group at the endpoint. Data represent the mean ± SD; n = 10 ( B – E ). Data are the mean ± SD; n = 2 or n = 3 ( G ). Data are representative of 2 ( F ) and 3 ( G ) independent biological experiments. ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, and **** P < 0.0001, by 1-way ANOVA.

    Techniques Used: In Vivo, In Vitro, Activity Assay, Expressing, Western Blot, Marker, Flow Cytometry

    anti p tyr15 cdc2  (Cell Signaling Technology Inc)


    Bioz Verified Symbol Cell Signaling Technology Inc is a verified supplier
    Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Cell Signaling Technology Inc manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 86

    Structured Review

    Cell Signaling Technology Inc anti p tyr15 cdc2
    Anti P Tyr15 Cdc2, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/anti p tyr15 cdc2/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
    anti p tyr15 cdc2 - by Bioz Stars, 2023-03
    86/100 stars

    Images

    anti p tyr15 cdc2 cdk1  (Cell Signaling Technology Inc)


    Bioz Verified Symbol Cell Signaling Technology Inc is a verified supplier
    Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Cell Signaling Technology Inc manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 86

    Structured Review

    Cell Signaling Technology Inc anti p tyr15 cdc2 cdk1
    Anti P Tyr15 Cdc2 Cdk1, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/anti p tyr15 cdc2 cdk1/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
    anti p tyr15 cdc2 cdk1 - by Bioz Stars, 2023-03
    86/100 stars

    Images

    p cdk1 t14  (Cell Signaling Technology Inc)


    Bioz Verified Symbol Cell Signaling Technology Inc is a verified supplier
    Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Cell Signaling Technology Inc manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 94

    Structured Review

    Cell Signaling Technology Inc p cdk1 t14
    ( A ) In vitro <t>CDK1</t> activity (top2 plots) was analyzed in EOC cells with or without ODF2L knockdown and then treated with DMSO or AZD1775 (treatment: DMSO/200 nM AZD1775, 4 hours). ( B ) Immunoblots of the <t>T14</t> and Y15 phosphorylation status of CDK1 in the indicated EOC cells (treatment: DMSO/200 nM AZD1775, 24 hours). ( C and D ) In vitro CDK1 activity (top 2 plots) was analyzed in CDK1 T14A–expressing ( C ), CDK1 Y15F–expressing ( D ), and CDK1 WT–expressing ( C and D ) EOC cells with endogenous CDK1 removed (treatment: DMSO or 200 nM AZD1775 for 4 hours). ( E and F ) Representative images and quantification of colony formation ( E ) and apoptotic cell death ( F ) of EOC cells with or without ODF2L knockdown. Cells were treated with sublethal doses of AZD1775 (A2780, 200 nM; SKOV3, 200 nM) together with or without 5 μM Ro-3306 for 72 hours. Data are the mean ± SD from 3 technical replicates of each sample and are representative of 3 ( A ), 2 ( B ), and 3 ( C – F ) independent biological experiments. Blots shown were run in parallel, contemporaneously using the same cell lysate harvested from 1 representative experiment for each cell line in A – D . *** P < 0.001 and **** P < 0.0001, by 1-way ANOVA.
    P Cdk1 T14, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/p cdk1 t14/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
    p cdk1 t14 - by Bioz Stars, 2023-03
    94/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "ODF2L acts as a synthetic lethal partner with WEE1 inhibition in epithelial ovarian cancer models"

    Article Title: ODF2L acts as a synthetic lethal partner with WEE1 inhibition in epithelial ovarian cancer models

    Journal: The Journal of Clinical Investigation

    doi: 10.1172/JCI161544

    ( A ) In vitro CDK1 activity (top2 plots) was analyzed in EOC cells with or without ODF2L knockdown and then treated with DMSO or AZD1775 (treatment: DMSO/200 nM AZD1775, 4 hours). ( B ) Immunoblots of the T14 and Y15 phosphorylation status of CDK1 in the indicated EOC cells (treatment: DMSO/200 nM AZD1775, 24 hours). ( C and D ) In vitro CDK1 activity (top 2 plots) was analyzed in CDK1 T14A–expressing ( C ), CDK1 Y15F–expressing ( D ), and CDK1 WT–expressing ( C and D ) EOC cells with endogenous CDK1 removed (treatment: DMSO or 200 nM AZD1775 for 4 hours). ( E and F ) Representative images and quantification of colony formation ( E ) and apoptotic cell death ( F ) of EOC cells with or without ODF2L knockdown. Cells were treated with sublethal doses of AZD1775 (A2780, 200 nM; SKOV3, 200 nM) together with or without 5 μM Ro-3306 for 72 hours. Data are the mean ± SD from 3 technical replicates of each sample and are representative of 3 ( A ), 2 ( B ), and 3 ( C – F ) independent biological experiments. Blots shown were run in parallel, contemporaneously using the same cell lysate harvested from 1 representative experiment for each cell line in A – D . *** P < 0.001 and **** P < 0.0001, by 1-way ANOVA.
    Figure Legend Snippet: ( A ) In vitro CDK1 activity (top2 plots) was analyzed in EOC cells with or without ODF2L knockdown and then treated with DMSO or AZD1775 (treatment: DMSO/200 nM AZD1775, 4 hours). ( B ) Immunoblots of the T14 and Y15 phosphorylation status of CDK1 in the indicated EOC cells (treatment: DMSO/200 nM AZD1775, 24 hours). ( C and D ) In vitro CDK1 activity (top 2 plots) was analyzed in CDK1 T14A–expressing ( C ), CDK1 Y15F–expressing ( D ), and CDK1 WT–expressing ( C and D ) EOC cells with endogenous CDK1 removed (treatment: DMSO or 200 nM AZD1775 for 4 hours). ( E and F ) Representative images and quantification of colony formation ( E ) and apoptotic cell death ( F ) of EOC cells with or without ODF2L knockdown. Cells were treated with sublethal doses of AZD1775 (A2780, 200 nM; SKOV3, 200 nM) together with or without 5 μM Ro-3306 for 72 hours. Data are the mean ± SD from 3 technical replicates of each sample and are representative of 3 ( A ), 2 ( B ), and 3 ( C – F ) independent biological experiments. Blots shown were run in parallel, contemporaneously using the same cell lysate harvested from 1 representative experiment for each cell line in A – D . *** P < 0.001 and **** P < 0.0001, by 1-way ANOVA.

    Techniques Used: In Vitro, Activity Assay, Western Blot, Expressing

    ( A ) Analysis of correlations between CDK1 expression levels and those of WEE1, PKMYT1, and ODF2L using TCGA OV data. ( B ) Analysis of the endogenous interaction between ODF2L and PKMYT1 by reverse coimmunoprecipitation followed by immunoblotting. ( C and D ) Analysis of the interaction between CDK1 and PKMYT1 in ODF2L-knockdown EOC cells ( C ) and the interaction between CDK1 and ODF2L in PKMYT1 knockdown EOC cells ( D ) by immunoprecipitation of endogenous CDK1 followed by immunoblotting. ( E ) BRET assay for the binding of PKMYT1 and CDK1 (plasmid design strategy is shown on left) measured in the indicated cells transfected with Halo-tagged CDK1 and Nluc-tagged PKMYT1 in the absence or presence of ODF2L. ( F ) Analysis of the binding of CDK1 and PKMYT1 to the C-terminally, middle-range, and N-terminally truncated ODF2L by coimmunoprecipitation. The indicated cells were cotransfected with Myc-PKMYT1, CDK1-V5, or Flag-tagged truncated ODF2L domains. ( G and H ) Analysis of cell viability upon AZD1775 treatment with or without ODF2L knockdown upon overexpression of PKMYT1 ( G ) or knockdown of PKMYT1 ( H ). AZD1775 (A2780, 200 nM; SKOV3, 200 nM). Data are the mean ± SD from 3 technical replicates in E , G , and H . Data are representative of 2 ( B ), 2 ( C ), 2 ( D ), 3 ( E ), 2 ( F ), 2 ( G ), and 2 ( H ) independent biological experiments. Blots shown were run in parallel, contemporaneously using the same cell lysate harvested from 1 representative experiment for each cell line in H . ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, and **** P < 0.0001, by 1-way ANOVA.
    Figure Legend Snippet: ( A ) Analysis of correlations between CDK1 expression levels and those of WEE1, PKMYT1, and ODF2L using TCGA OV data. ( B ) Analysis of the endogenous interaction between ODF2L and PKMYT1 by reverse coimmunoprecipitation followed by immunoblotting. ( C and D ) Analysis of the interaction between CDK1 and PKMYT1 in ODF2L-knockdown EOC cells ( C ) and the interaction between CDK1 and ODF2L in PKMYT1 knockdown EOC cells ( D ) by immunoprecipitation of endogenous CDK1 followed by immunoblotting. ( E ) BRET assay for the binding of PKMYT1 and CDK1 (plasmid design strategy is shown on left) measured in the indicated cells transfected with Halo-tagged CDK1 and Nluc-tagged PKMYT1 in the absence or presence of ODF2L. ( F ) Analysis of the binding of CDK1 and PKMYT1 to the C-terminally, middle-range, and N-terminally truncated ODF2L by coimmunoprecipitation. The indicated cells were cotransfected with Myc-PKMYT1, CDK1-V5, or Flag-tagged truncated ODF2L domains. ( G and H ) Analysis of cell viability upon AZD1775 treatment with or without ODF2L knockdown upon overexpression of PKMYT1 ( G ) or knockdown of PKMYT1 ( H ). AZD1775 (A2780, 200 nM; SKOV3, 200 nM). Data are the mean ± SD from 3 technical replicates in E , G , and H . Data are representative of 2 ( B ), 2 ( C ), 2 ( D ), 3 ( E ), 2 ( F ), 2 ( G ), and 2 ( H ) independent biological experiments. Blots shown were run in parallel, contemporaneously using the same cell lysate harvested from 1 representative experiment for each cell line in H . ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, and **** P < 0.0001, by 1-way ANOVA.

    Techniques Used: Expressing, Western Blot, Immunoprecipitation, Bioluminescence Resonance Energy Transfer, Binding Assay, Plasmid Preparation, Transfection, Over Expression

    ( A and B ) In vitro CDK1 activity, total ODF2L expression levels ( A ) and cell viability ( B ) were analyzed in AZD1775-treated EOC cells derived from the primary tumor tissue of 57 ovarian cancer patients. Patient 1 was used as a control for different batches and labeled blue. ( C and D ) Analysis of correlations between ODF2L expression levels and CDK1 activity ( C ) or cell viability ( D ) in AZD1775-treated primary EOC cells. ODF2L expression levels and CDK1 activity were measured by quantification of the blots in A using ImageJ software. ( E ) Effect of ODF2L expression levels on in vivo tumor growth of PDXs treated with AZD1775. Tumor tissue from patients 1, 5, and 10; patients 3 and 21; and patients 33 and 36 were chosen for the xenograft on the basis of the differential expression levels of ODF2L in the primary cells confirmed by Western blotting. Mice were evenly grouped when the volume of their tumors reached approximately 100 mm 3 25 days after xenografting and were treated with vehicle or AZD1775 (40 mg/kg, orally, once per day). ID, identification. Data are representative of 2 ( A ) and 3 ( B ) independent biological experiments and represent the mean ± SD of 3 technical replicates of each sample ( B ). Error bars in E represent the SEM for tumor volume ( n = 6). ** P < 0.01 and *** P < 0.0001, by 2-tailed Pearson’s correlation coefficient ( C and D ), 2-way ANOVA for tumor volume ( E ), and 1-way ANOVA for tumor weight ( F ).
    Figure Legend Snippet: ( A and B ) In vitro CDK1 activity, total ODF2L expression levels ( A ) and cell viability ( B ) were analyzed in AZD1775-treated EOC cells derived from the primary tumor tissue of 57 ovarian cancer patients. Patient 1 was used as a control for different batches and labeled blue. ( C and D ) Analysis of correlations between ODF2L expression levels and CDK1 activity ( C ) or cell viability ( D ) in AZD1775-treated primary EOC cells. ODF2L expression levels and CDK1 activity were measured by quantification of the blots in A using ImageJ software. ( E ) Effect of ODF2L expression levels on in vivo tumor growth of PDXs treated with AZD1775. Tumor tissue from patients 1, 5, and 10; patients 3 and 21; and patients 33 and 36 were chosen for the xenograft on the basis of the differential expression levels of ODF2L in the primary cells confirmed by Western blotting. Mice were evenly grouped when the volume of their tumors reached approximately 100 mm 3 25 days after xenografting and were treated with vehicle or AZD1775 (40 mg/kg, orally, once per day). ID, identification. Data are representative of 2 ( A ) and 3 ( B ) independent biological experiments and represent the mean ± SD of 3 technical replicates of each sample ( B ). Error bars in E represent the SEM for tumor volume ( n = 6). ** P < 0.01 and *** P < 0.0001, by 2-tailed Pearson’s correlation coefficient ( C and D ), 2-way ANOVA for tumor volume ( E ), and 1-way ANOVA for tumor weight ( F ).

    Techniques Used: In Vitro, Activity Assay, Expressing, Derivative Assay, Labeling, Software, In Vivo, Western Blot

    ( A ) Schematic illustration of targeted LNP against ovarian ID8 cells using the ASSET platform (upper panel) and experimental design (lower panel). ( B and C ) Effect of combination treatment with siODF2L-LNP and AZD1775 on ID8 tumor growth. In vivo bioluminescence image ( B ) and average photonic flux ( C ) at week 7. LNPs (0.75 mg/kg, twice a week); AZD1775 (30 mg/kg, orally, once per day). n = 10. ( D ) Survival curves of ID8-bearing mice in the indicated groups. n = 10. ( E ) Quantification of peritoneal ID8 tumor nodule numbers in mice at the endpoint. ( F and G ) In vitro CDK1 activity and total ODF2L expression levels were analyzed by Western blotting ( F ), and the level of the DNA damage marker γH2AX was analyzed ( G ) by flow cytometry in the 2 or 3 ID8 tumors harvested from mice in each group at the endpoint. Data represent the mean ± SD; n = 10 ( B – E ). Data are the mean ± SD; n = 2 or n = 3 ( G ). Data are representative of 2 ( F ) and 3 ( G ) independent biological experiments. ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, and **** P < 0.0001, by 1-way ANOVA.
    Figure Legend Snippet: ( A ) Schematic illustration of targeted LNP against ovarian ID8 cells using the ASSET platform (upper panel) and experimental design (lower panel). ( B and C ) Effect of combination treatment with siODF2L-LNP and AZD1775 on ID8 tumor growth. In vivo bioluminescence image ( B ) and average photonic flux ( C ) at week 7. LNPs (0.75 mg/kg, twice a week); AZD1775 (30 mg/kg, orally, once per day). n = 10. ( D ) Survival curves of ID8-bearing mice in the indicated groups. n = 10. ( E ) Quantification of peritoneal ID8 tumor nodule numbers in mice at the endpoint. ( F and G ) In vitro CDK1 activity and total ODF2L expression levels were analyzed by Western blotting ( F ), and the level of the DNA damage marker γH2AX was analyzed ( G ) by flow cytometry in the 2 or 3 ID8 tumors harvested from mice in each group at the endpoint. Data represent the mean ± SD; n = 10 ( B – E ). Data are the mean ± SD; n = 2 or n = 3 ( G ). Data are representative of 2 ( F ) and 3 ( G ) independent biological experiments. ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, and **** P < 0.0001, by 1-way ANOVA.

    Techniques Used: In Vivo, In Vitro, Activity Assay, Expressing, Western Blot, Marker, Flow Cytometry

    p cdc2  (Cell Signaling Technology Inc)


    Bioz Verified Symbol Cell Signaling Technology Inc is a verified supplier
    Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Cell Signaling Technology Inc manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 95

    Structured Review

    Cell Signaling Technology Inc p cdc2
    P Cdc2, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/p cdc2/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
    p cdc2 - by Bioz Stars, 2023-03
    95/100 stars

    Images

    p cdc2 tyr15  (Cell Signaling Technology Inc)


    Bioz Verified Symbol Cell Signaling Technology Inc is a verified supplier
    Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Cell Signaling Technology Inc manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 86

    Structured Review

    Cell Signaling Technology Inc p cdc2 tyr15
    P Cdc2 Tyr15, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/p cdc2 tyr15/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
    p cdc2 tyr15 - by Bioz Stars, 2023-03
    86/100 stars

    Images

    anti p cdc2 y15 rabbit monoclonal antibody  (Cell Signaling Technology Inc)


    Bioz Verified Symbol Cell Signaling Technology Inc is a verified supplier
    Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Cell Signaling Technology Inc manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 95

    Structured Review

    Cell Signaling Technology Inc anti p cdc2 y15 rabbit monoclonal antibody
    Anti P Cdc2 Y15 Rabbit Monoclonal Antibody, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/anti p cdc2 y15 rabbit monoclonal antibody/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
    anti p cdc2 y15 rabbit monoclonal antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2023-03
    95/100 stars

    Images

    p cdc2 antibodies  (Cell Signaling Technology Inc)


    Bioz Verified Symbol Cell Signaling Technology Inc is a verified supplier
    Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Cell Signaling Technology Inc manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 96

    Structured Review

    Cell Signaling Technology Inc p cdc2 antibodies
    Increased expression of cell cycle regulatory proteins in AD transgenic mice : A) Cyclin E, E2F1 and <t>P-cdc2</t> levels are upregulated in transgenic mice expressing APP and PS/APP: Brain sections from Ntg normal mice (a, c, f) were compared to those from transgenic mice expressing APP (d, g) and PS/APP (b, e, h) using cyclin E (upper panel), E2F1 (middle panel) or P-cdc2 (lower panel) antibodies. Images (a-e, 5× and f-h 20×) were taken using a Nikon E1000 microscope and analyzed using Image-Pro Plus software. The P-cdc2 and images in the inset show magnified images (20×) of the plaques to visualize the cells. We found that the cells surrounding the plaques were positive for cyclin E, E2F1, and P-cdc2, and it appears that both neurons (black arrow head) and glia (white arrow head) were positive for P-cdc2. 'Secondary antibodies only' control did not show any specific staining of the sections (data not shown). B) Quantitative analysis of cyclin D1 and E expression in APP and PS/APP transgenic mice brains: Brain sections from Ntg and mice expressing APP and PS/APP were stained using a monoclonal cyclin D1 or a polyclonal cyclin E antibody and nuclei visualized using Hoechst. The signal intensity was measured using Image J, image processing and analysis program. The signal strength was compared to that with Hoechst nuclear staining from each section to avoid mouse-to-mouse variation. The means of results from six independent mice are shown with standard error bars and P values. While APP mice showed a significantly higher level of only cyclin E compared to cyclin D1, PS/APP mice showed higher levels of both cyclin D1 and E levels compared to Ntg.
    P Cdc2 Antibodies, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/p cdc2 antibodies/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
    p cdc2 antibodies - by Bioz Stars, 2023-03
    96/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Mitosis-specific phosphorylation of amyloid precursor protein at Threonine 668 leads to its altered processing and association with centrosomes"

    Article Title: Mitosis-specific phosphorylation of amyloid precursor protein at Threonine 668 leads to its altered processing and association with centrosomes

    Journal: Molecular Neurodegeneration

    doi: 10.1186/1750-1326-6-80

    Increased expression of cell cycle regulatory proteins in AD transgenic mice : A) Cyclin E, E2F1 and P-cdc2 levels are upregulated in transgenic mice expressing APP and PS/APP: Brain sections from Ntg normal mice (a, c, f) were compared to those from transgenic mice expressing APP (d, g) and PS/APP (b, e, h) using cyclin E (upper panel), E2F1 (middle panel) or P-cdc2 (lower panel) antibodies. Images (a-e, 5× and f-h 20×) were taken using a Nikon E1000 microscope and analyzed using Image-Pro Plus software. The P-cdc2 and images in the inset show magnified images (20×) of the plaques to visualize the cells. We found that the cells surrounding the plaques were positive for cyclin E, E2F1, and P-cdc2, and it appears that both neurons (black arrow head) and glia (white arrow head) were positive for P-cdc2. 'Secondary antibodies only' control did not show any specific staining of the sections (data not shown). B) Quantitative analysis of cyclin D1 and E expression in APP and PS/APP transgenic mice brains: Brain sections from Ntg and mice expressing APP and PS/APP were stained using a monoclonal cyclin D1 or a polyclonal cyclin E antibody and nuclei visualized using Hoechst. The signal intensity was measured using Image J, image processing and analysis program. The signal strength was compared to that with Hoechst nuclear staining from each section to avoid mouse-to-mouse variation. The means of results from six independent mice are shown with standard error bars and P values. While APP mice showed a significantly higher level of only cyclin E compared to cyclin D1, PS/APP mice showed higher levels of both cyclin D1 and E levels compared to Ntg.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Increased expression of cell cycle regulatory proteins in AD transgenic mice : A) Cyclin E, E2F1 and P-cdc2 levels are upregulated in transgenic mice expressing APP and PS/APP: Brain sections from Ntg normal mice (a, c, f) were compared to those from transgenic mice expressing APP (d, g) and PS/APP (b, e, h) using cyclin E (upper panel), E2F1 (middle panel) or P-cdc2 (lower panel) antibodies. Images (a-e, 5× and f-h 20×) were taken using a Nikon E1000 microscope and analyzed using Image-Pro Plus software. The P-cdc2 and images in the inset show magnified images (20×) of the plaques to visualize the cells. We found that the cells surrounding the plaques were positive for cyclin E, E2F1, and P-cdc2, and it appears that both neurons (black arrow head) and glia (white arrow head) were positive for P-cdc2. 'Secondary antibodies only' control did not show any specific staining of the sections (data not shown). B) Quantitative analysis of cyclin D1 and E expression in APP and PS/APP transgenic mice brains: Brain sections from Ntg and mice expressing APP and PS/APP were stained using a monoclonal cyclin D1 or a polyclonal cyclin E antibody and nuclei visualized using Hoechst. The signal intensity was measured using Image J, image processing and analysis program. The signal strength was compared to that with Hoechst nuclear staining from each section to avoid mouse-to-mouse variation. The means of results from six independent mice are shown with standard error bars and P values. While APP mice showed a significantly higher level of only cyclin E compared to cyclin D1, PS/APP mice showed higher levels of both cyclin D1 and E levels compared to Ntg.

    Techniques Used: Expressing, Transgenic Assay, Microscopy, Software, Staining

    p cdc2  (Cell Signaling Technology Inc)


    Bioz Verified Symbol Cell Signaling Technology Inc is a verified supplier
    Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Cell Signaling Technology Inc manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 96

    Structured Review

    Cell Signaling Technology Inc p cdc2
    P Cdc2, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/p cdc2/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
    p cdc2 - by Bioz Stars, 2023-03
    96/100 stars

    Images

    p cdc2  (Cell Signaling Technology Inc)


    Bioz Verified Symbol Cell Signaling Technology Inc is a verified supplier
    Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Cell Signaling Technology Inc manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 96

    Structured Review

    Cell Signaling Technology Inc p cdc2
    Effect of EA and UA on protein expression of cell cycle regulatory molecules. DU-145 cells were cultured as described and treated with 30, 60, and 90 μ mol/L of UA or with 0, 15, 30, and 45 μ mol/L of EA (b) for 48 and 72 hours. Representative western blots from 3 independent experiments showing the different effects of EA and UA on cyclin B1, Cyclin D1, and <t>phospho-cdc2</t> at Tyrosin-15 (a, b). Quantification of bands was performed by densitometric analysis (c, d). Data are reported as mean of three independent experiments ± S.D; *significantly different from DMSO/control, P < 0.01; **significantly different from DMSO/control, P < 0.001.
    P Cdc2, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/p cdc2/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
    p cdc2 - by Bioz Stars, 2023-03
    96/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Pomegranate Juice Metabolites, Ellagic Acid and Urolithin A, Synergistically Inhibit Androgen-Independent Prostate Cancer Cell Growth via Distinct Effects on Cell Cycle Control and Apoptosis"

    Article Title: Pomegranate Juice Metabolites, Ellagic Acid and Urolithin A, Synergistically Inhibit Androgen-Independent Prostate Cancer Cell Growth via Distinct Effects on Cell Cycle Control and Apoptosis

    Journal: Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine : eCAM

    doi: 10.1155/2013/247504

    Effect of EA and UA on protein expression of cell cycle regulatory molecules. DU-145 cells were cultured as described and treated with 30, 60, and 90 μ mol/L of UA or with 0, 15, 30, and 45 μ mol/L of EA (b) for 48 and 72 hours. Representative western blots from 3 independent experiments showing the different effects of EA and UA on cyclin B1, Cyclin D1, and phospho-cdc2 at Tyrosin-15 (a, b). Quantification of bands was performed by densitometric analysis (c, d). Data are reported as mean of three independent experiments ± S.D; *significantly different from DMSO/control, P < 0.01; **significantly different from DMSO/control, P < 0.001.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Effect of EA and UA on protein expression of cell cycle regulatory molecules. DU-145 cells were cultured as described and treated with 30, 60, and 90 μ mol/L of UA or with 0, 15, 30, and 45 μ mol/L of EA (b) for 48 and 72 hours. Representative western blots from 3 independent experiments showing the different effects of EA and UA on cyclin B1, Cyclin D1, and phospho-cdc2 at Tyrosin-15 (a, b). Quantification of bands was performed by densitometric analysis (c, d). Data are reported as mean of three independent experiments ± S.D; *significantly different from DMSO/control, P < 0.01; **significantly different from DMSO/control, P < 0.001.

    Techniques Used: Expressing, Cell Culture, Western Blot

    p cdc2  (Cell Signaling Technology Inc)


    Bioz Verified Symbol Cell Signaling Technology Inc is a verified supplier
    Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Cell Signaling Technology Inc manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 96

    Structured Review

    Cell Signaling Technology Inc p cdc2
    ( a–d ) 5×10 5 BCBL-1 cells were seeded with 100 µM nimesulide or DMSO. Total cell lysates were collected at 2 h, 8 h, and 24 h post-treatment and immunoblotted for p53 ( a ), p21 ( a ), cyclin D1 ( b ), cdk6 ( b ), cyclin E ( c ), cyclin A ( c ), <t>p-cdc2</t> ( d ), and T-cdc25C ( d ) and normalized with respect to the tubulin loading control and T-cdc2 for the p-cdc2 blot. The cells were neither replenished with fresh media nor supplemented with the drugs. The fold change was calculated with respect to untreated (UN) cells at 0 h. ( a–d ) The data is representative of duplicate experiments. ( e ) 5×10 5 BCBL-1 cells were seeded with 100 µM nimesulide or DMSO and collected to examine the interaction between p53 and LANA-1 by immunofluorescence 24 h post-treatment. ( f ) Nuclear lysates isolated from BCBL-1 cells seeded with 100 µM nimesulide, DMSO or left untreated (UN) were immunoprecipitated (IP) with either LANA-1 or p53 and Western blotted (WB) with p53 and LANA-1 or p53, respectively. Level of LANA-1 in pre-IP input was assessed by Western blotting with LANA-1 antibody. β-actin was used as the loading control. ( e–f ) The cells were neither replenished with fresh media nor supplemented with the drugs.
    P Cdc2, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/p cdc2/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
    p cdc2 - by Bioz Stars, 2023-03
    96/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Targeting KSHV/HHV-8 Latency with COX-2 Selective Inhibitor Nimesulide: A Potential Chemotherapeutic Modality for Primary Effusion Lymphoma"

    Article Title: Targeting KSHV/HHV-8 Latency with COX-2 Selective Inhibitor Nimesulide: A Potential Chemotherapeutic Modality for Primary Effusion Lymphoma

    Journal: PLoS ONE

    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0024379

    ( a–d ) 5×10 5 BCBL-1 cells were seeded with 100 µM nimesulide or DMSO. Total cell lysates were collected at 2 h, 8 h, and 24 h post-treatment and immunoblotted for p53 ( a ), p21 ( a ), cyclin D1 ( b ), cdk6 ( b ), cyclin E ( c ), cyclin A ( c ), p-cdc2 ( d ), and T-cdc25C ( d ) and normalized with respect to the tubulin loading control and T-cdc2 for the p-cdc2 blot. The cells were neither replenished with fresh media nor supplemented with the drugs. The fold change was calculated with respect to untreated (UN) cells at 0 h. ( a–d ) The data is representative of duplicate experiments. ( e ) 5×10 5 BCBL-1 cells were seeded with 100 µM nimesulide or DMSO and collected to examine the interaction between p53 and LANA-1 by immunofluorescence 24 h post-treatment. ( f ) Nuclear lysates isolated from BCBL-1 cells seeded with 100 µM nimesulide, DMSO or left untreated (UN) were immunoprecipitated (IP) with either LANA-1 or p53 and Western blotted (WB) with p53 and LANA-1 or p53, respectively. Level of LANA-1 in pre-IP input was assessed by Western blotting with LANA-1 antibody. β-actin was used as the loading control. ( e–f ) The cells were neither replenished with fresh media nor supplemented with the drugs.
    Figure Legend Snippet: ( a–d ) 5×10 5 BCBL-1 cells were seeded with 100 µM nimesulide or DMSO. Total cell lysates were collected at 2 h, 8 h, and 24 h post-treatment and immunoblotted for p53 ( a ), p21 ( a ), cyclin D1 ( b ), cdk6 ( b ), cyclin E ( c ), cyclin A ( c ), p-cdc2 ( d ), and T-cdc25C ( d ) and normalized with respect to the tubulin loading control and T-cdc2 for the p-cdc2 blot. The cells were neither replenished with fresh media nor supplemented with the drugs. The fold change was calculated with respect to untreated (UN) cells at 0 h. ( a–d ) The data is representative of duplicate experiments. ( e ) 5×10 5 BCBL-1 cells were seeded with 100 µM nimesulide or DMSO and collected to examine the interaction between p53 and LANA-1 by immunofluorescence 24 h post-treatment. ( f ) Nuclear lysates isolated from BCBL-1 cells seeded with 100 µM nimesulide, DMSO or left untreated (UN) were immunoprecipitated (IP) with either LANA-1 or p53 and Western blotted (WB) with p53 and LANA-1 or p53, respectively. Level of LANA-1 in pre-IP input was assessed by Western blotting with LANA-1 antibody. β-actin was used as the loading control. ( e–f ) The cells were neither replenished with fresh media nor supplemented with the drugs.

    Techniques Used: Immunofluorescence, Isolation, Immunoprecipitation, Western Blot

    Similar Products

  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 94
    Cell Signaling Technology Inc p cdk1 t14
    ( A ) In vitro <t>CDK1</t> activity (top2 plots) was analyzed in EOC cells with or without ODF2L knockdown and then treated with DMSO or AZD1775 (treatment: DMSO/200 nM AZD1775, 4 hours). ( B ) Immunoblots of the <t>T14</t> and Y15 phosphorylation status of CDK1 in the indicated EOC cells (treatment: DMSO/200 nM AZD1775, 24 hours). ( C and D ) In vitro CDK1 activity (top 2 plots) was analyzed in CDK1 T14A–expressing ( C ), CDK1 Y15F–expressing ( D ), and CDK1 WT–expressing ( C and D ) EOC cells with endogenous CDK1 removed (treatment: DMSO or 200 nM AZD1775 for 4 hours). ( E and F ) Representative images and quantification of colony formation ( E ) and apoptotic cell death ( F ) of EOC cells with or without ODF2L knockdown. Cells were treated with sublethal doses of AZD1775 (A2780, 200 nM; SKOV3, 200 nM) together with or without 5 μM Ro-3306 for 72 hours. Data are the mean ± SD from 3 technical replicates of each sample and are representative of 3 ( A ), 2 ( B ), and 3 ( C – F ) independent biological experiments. Blots shown were run in parallel, contemporaneously using the same cell lysate harvested from 1 representative experiment for each cell line in A – D . *** P < 0.001 and **** P < 0.0001, by 1-way ANOVA.
    P Cdk1 T14, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/p cdk1 t14/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
    p cdk1 t14 - by Bioz Stars, 2023-03
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    Cell Signaling Technology Inc anti p tyr15 cdc2
    ( A ) In vitro <t>CDK1</t> activity (top2 plots) was analyzed in EOC cells with or without ODF2L knockdown and then treated with DMSO or AZD1775 (treatment: DMSO/200 nM AZD1775, 4 hours). ( B ) Immunoblots of the <t>T14</t> and Y15 phosphorylation status of CDK1 in the indicated EOC cells (treatment: DMSO/200 nM AZD1775, 24 hours). ( C and D ) In vitro CDK1 activity (top 2 plots) was analyzed in CDK1 T14A–expressing ( C ), CDK1 Y15F–expressing ( D ), and CDK1 WT–expressing ( C and D ) EOC cells with endogenous CDK1 removed (treatment: DMSO or 200 nM AZD1775 for 4 hours). ( E and F ) Representative images and quantification of colony formation ( E ) and apoptotic cell death ( F ) of EOC cells with or without ODF2L knockdown. Cells were treated with sublethal doses of AZD1775 (A2780, 200 nM; SKOV3, 200 nM) together with or without 5 μM Ro-3306 for 72 hours. Data are the mean ± SD from 3 technical replicates of each sample and are representative of 3 ( A ), 2 ( B ), and 3 ( C – F ) independent biological experiments. Blots shown were run in parallel, contemporaneously using the same cell lysate harvested from 1 representative experiment for each cell line in A – D . *** P < 0.001 and **** P < 0.0001, by 1-way ANOVA.
    Anti P Tyr15 Cdc2, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/anti p tyr15 cdc2/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
    anti p tyr15 cdc2 - by Bioz Stars, 2023-03
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    Cell Signaling Technology Inc anti p tyr15 cdc2 cdk1
    ( A ) In vitro <t>CDK1</t> activity (top2 plots) was analyzed in EOC cells with or without ODF2L knockdown and then treated with DMSO or AZD1775 (treatment: DMSO/200 nM AZD1775, 4 hours). ( B ) Immunoblots of the <t>T14</t> and Y15 phosphorylation status of CDK1 in the indicated EOC cells (treatment: DMSO/200 nM AZD1775, 24 hours). ( C and D ) In vitro CDK1 activity (top 2 plots) was analyzed in CDK1 T14A–expressing ( C ), CDK1 Y15F–expressing ( D ), and CDK1 WT–expressing ( C and D ) EOC cells with endogenous CDK1 removed (treatment: DMSO or 200 nM AZD1775 for 4 hours). ( E and F ) Representative images and quantification of colony formation ( E ) and apoptotic cell death ( F ) of EOC cells with or without ODF2L knockdown. Cells were treated with sublethal doses of AZD1775 (A2780, 200 nM; SKOV3, 200 nM) together with or without 5 μM Ro-3306 for 72 hours. Data are the mean ± SD from 3 technical replicates of each sample and are representative of 3 ( A ), 2 ( B ), and 3 ( C – F ) independent biological experiments. Blots shown were run in parallel, contemporaneously using the same cell lysate harvested from 1 representative experiment for each cell line in A – D . *** P < 0.001 and **** P < 0.0001, by 1-way ANOVA.
    Anti P Tyr15 Cdc2 Cdk1, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/anti p tyr15 cdc2 cdk1/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
    anti p tyr15 cdc2 cdk1 - by Bioz Stars, 2023-03
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    95
    Cell Signaling Technology Inc p cdc2
    ( A ) In vitro <t>CDK1</t> activity (top2 plots) was analyzed in EOC cells with or without ODF2L knockdown and then treated with DMSO or AZD1775 (treatment: DMSO/200 nM AZD1775, 4 hours). ( B ) Immunoblots of the <t>T14</t> and Y15 phosphorylation status of CDK1 in the indicated EOC cells (treatment: DMSO/200 nM AZD1775, 24 hours). ( C and D ) In vitro CDK1 activity (top 2 plots) was analyzed in CDK1 T14A–expressing ( C ), CDK1 Y15F–expressing ( D ), and CDK1 WT–expressing ( C and D ) EOC cells with endogenous CDK1 removed (treatment: DMSO or 200 nM AZD1775 for 4 hours). ( E and F ) Representative images and quantification of colony formation ( E ) and apoptotic cell death ( F ) of EOC cells with or without ODF2L knockdown. Cells were treated with sublethal doses of AZD1775 (A2780, 200 nM; SKOV3, 200 nM) together with or without 5 μM Ro-3306 for 72 hours. Data are the mean ± SD from 3 technical replicates of each sample and are representative of 3 ( A ), 2 ( B ), and 3 ( C – F ) independent biological experiments. Blots shown were run in parallel, contemporaneously using the same cell lysate harvested from 1 representative experiment for each cell line in A – D . *** P < 0.001 and **** P < 0.0001, by 1-way ANOVA.
    P Cdc2, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/p cdc2/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
    p cdc2 - by Bioz Stars, 2023-03
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    Cell Signaling Technology Inc p cdc2 tyr15
    ( A ) In vitro <t>CDK1</t> activity (top2 plots) was analyzed in EOC cells with or without ODF2L knockdown and then treated with DMSO or AZD1775 (treatment: DMSO/200 nM AZD1775, 4 hours). ( B ) Immunoblots of the <t>T14</t> and Y15 phosphorylation status of CDK1 in the indicated EOC cells (treatment: DMSO/200 nM AZD1775, 24 hours). ( C and D ) In vitro CDK1 activity (top 2 plots) was analyzed in CDK1 T14A–expressing ( C ), CDK1 Y15F–expressing ( D ), and CDK1 WT–expressing ( C and D ) EOC cells with endogenous CDK1 removed (treatment: DMSO or 200 nM AZD1775 for 4 hours). ( E and F ) Representative images and quantification of colony formation ( E ) and apoptotic cell death ( F ) of EOC cells with or without ODF2L knockdown. Cells were treated with sublethal doses of AZD1775 (A2780, 200 nM; SKOV3, 200 nM) together with or without 5 μM Ro-3306 for 72 hours. Data are the mean ± SD from 3 technical replicates of each sample and are representative of 3 ( A ), 2 ( B ), and 3 ( C – F ) independent biological experiments. Blots shown were run in parallel, contemporaneously using the same cell lysate harvested from 1 representative experiment for each cell line in A – D . *** P < 0.001 and **** P < 0.0001, by 1-way ANOVA.
    P Cdc2 Tyr15, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/p cdc2 tyr15/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
    p cdc2 tyr15 - by Bioz Stars, 2023-03
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    95
    Cell Signaling Technology Inc anti p cdc2 y15 rabbit monoclonal antibody
    ( A ) In vitro <t>CDK1</t> activity (top2 plots) was analyzed in EOC cells with or without ODF2L knockdown and then treated with DMSO or AZD1775 (treatment: DMSO/200 nM AZD1775, 4 hours). ( B ) Immunoblots of the <t>T14</t> and Y15 phosphorylation status of CDK1 in the indicated EOC cells (treatment: DMSO/200 nM AZD1775, 24 hours). ( C and D ) In vitro CDK1 activity (top 2 plots) was analyzed in CDK1 T14A–expressing ( C ), CDK1 Y15F–expressing ( D ), and CDK1 WT–expressing ( C and D ) EOC cells with endogenous CDK1 removed (treatment: DMSO or 200 nM AZD1775 for 4 hours). ( E and F ) Representative images and quantification of colony formation ( E ) and apoptotic cell death ( F ) of EOC cells with or without ODF2L knockdown. Cells were treated with sublethal doses of AZD1775 (A2780, 200 nM; SKOV3, 200 nM) together with or without 5 μM Ro-3306 for 72 hours. Data are the mean ± SD from 3 technical replicates of each sample and are representative of 3 ( A ), 2 ( B ), and 3 ( C – F ) independent biological experiments. Blots shown were run in parallel, contemporaneously using the same cell lysate harvested from 1 representative experiment for each cell line in A – D . *** P < 0.001 and **** P < 0.0001, by 1-way ANOVA.
    Anti P Cdc2 Y15 Rabbit Monoclonal Antibody, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/anti p cdc2 y15 rabbit monoclonal antibody/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
    anti p cdc2 y15 rabbit monoclonal antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2023-03
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    Cell Signaling Technology Inc p cdc2 antibodies
    Increased expression of cell cycle regulatory proteins in AD transgenic mice : A) Cyclin E, E2F1 and <t>P-cdc2</t> levels are upregulated in transgenic mice expressing APP and PS/APP: Brain sections from Ntg normal mice (a, c, f) were compared to those from transgenic mice expressing APP (d, g) and PS/APP (b, e, h) using cyclin E (upper panel), E2F1 (middle panel) or P-cdc2 (lower panel) antibodies. Images (a-e, 5× and f-h 20×) were taken using a Nikon E1000 microscope and analyzed using Image-Pro Plus software. The P-cdc2 and images in the inset show magnified images (20×) of the plaques to visualize the cells. We found that the cells surrounding the plaques were positive for cyclin E, E2F1, and P-cdc2, and it appears that both neurons (black arrow head) and glia (white arrow head) were positive for P-cdc2. 'Secondary antibodies only' control did not show any specific staining of the sections (data not shown). B) Quantitative analysis of cyclin D1 and E expression in APP and PS/APP transgenic mice brains: Brain sections from Ntg and mice expressing APP and PS/APP were stained using a monoclonal cyclin D1 or a polyclonal cyclin E antibody and nuclei visualized using Hoechst. The signal intensity was measured using Image J, image processing and analysis program. The signal strength was compared to that with Hoechst nuclear staining from each section to avoid mouse-to-mouse variation. The means of results from six independent mice are shown with standard error bars and P values. While APP mice showed a significantly higher level of only cyclin E compared to cyclin D1, PS/APP mice showed higher levels of both cyclin D1 and E levels compared to Ntg.
    P Cdc2 Antibodies, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/p cdc2 antibodies/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
    p cdc2 antibodies - by Bioz Stars, 2023-03
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    ( A ) In vitro CDK1 activity (top2 plots) was analyzed in EOC cells with or without ODF2L knockdown and then treated with DMSO or AZD1775 (treatment: DMSO/200 nM AZD1775, 4 hours). ( B ) Immunoblots of the T14 and Y15 phosphorylation status of CDK1 in the indicated EOC cells (treatment: DMSO/200 nM AZD1775, 24 hours). ( C and D ) In vitro CDK1 activity (top 2 plots) was analyzed in CDK1 T14A–expressing ( C ), CDK1 Y15F–expressing ( D ), and CDK1 WT–expressing ( C and D ) EOC cells with endogenous CDK1 removed (treatment: DMSO or 200 nM AZD1775 for 4 hours). ( E and F ) Representative images and quantification of colony formation ( E ) and apoptotic cell death ( F ) of EOC cells with or without ODF2L knockdown. Cells were treated with sublethal doses of AZD1775 (A2780, 200 nM; SKOV3, 200 nM) together with or without 5 μM Ro-3306 for 72 hours. Data are the mean ± SD from 3 technical replicates of each sample and are representative of 3 ( A ), 2 ( B ), and 3 ( C – F ) independent biological experiments. Blots shown were run in parallel, contemporaneously using the same cell lysate harvested from 1 representative experiment for each cell line in A – D . *** P < 0.001 and **** P < 0.0001, by 1-way ANOVA.

    Journal: The Journal of Clinical Investigation

    Article Title: ODF2L acts as a synthetic lethal partner with WEE1 inhibition in epithelial ovarian cancer models

    doi: 10.1172/JCI161544

    Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) In vitro CDK1 activity (top2 plots) was analyzed in EOC cells with or without ODF2L knockdown and then treated with DMSO or AZD1775 (treatment: DMSO/200 nM AZD1775, 4 hours). ( B ) Immunoblots of the T14 and Y15 phosphorylation status of CDK1 in the indicated EOC cells (treatment: DMSO/200 nM AZD1775, 24 hours). ( C and D ) In vitro CDK1 activity (top 2 plots) was analyzed in CDK1 T14A–expressing ( C ), CDK1 Y15F–expressing ( D ), and CDK1 WT–expressing ( C and D ) EOC cells with endogenous CDK1 removed (treatment: DMSO or 200 nM AZD1775 for 4 hours). ( E and F ) Representative images and quantification of colony formation ( E ) and apoptotic cell death ( F ) of EOC cells with or without ODF2L knockdown. Cells were treated with sublethal doses of AZD1775 (A2780, 200 nM; SKOV3, 200 nM) together with or without 5 μM Ro-3306 for 72 hours. Data are the mean ± SD from 3 technical replicates of each sample and are representative of 3 ( A ), 2 ( B ), and 3 ( C – F ) independent biological experiments. Blots shown were run in parallel, contemporaneously using the same cell lysate harvested from 1 representative experiment for each cell line in A – D . *** P < 0.001 and **** P < 0.0001, by 1-way ANOVA.

    Article Snippet: In the immunoblots using the whole-cell lysate, antibodies against p-ATM (Ser1981) (catalog 5883); ATM (catalog 2873); p-CHK2 (Thr68) (catalog 2197), CHK2 (catalog 6334); p-RPA32/RPA2 S8 (catalog 83745); RPA32/RPA2 (catalog 35869); p-CDK1 (Tyr15) (catalog 4539); p-CDK1 T14 (catalog 2543); CDK1 (catalog 77055); p–histone γH2AX (Ser139) (catalog 9718); and PKMYT1 (catalog 4282) were all obtained from Cell Signaling Technology.

    Techniques: In Vitro, Activity Assay, Western Blot, Expressing

    ( A ) Analysis of correlations between CDK1 expression levels and those of WEE1, PKMYT1, and ODF2L using TCGA OV data. ( B ) Analysis of the endogenous interaction between ODF2L and PKMYT1 by reverse coimmunoprecipitation followed by immunoblotting. ( C and D ) Analysis of the interaction between CDK1 and PKMYT1 in ODF2L-knockdown EOC cells ( C ) and the interaction between CDK1 and ODF2L in PKMYT1 knockdown EOC cells ( D ) by immunoprecipitation of endogenous CDK1 followed by immunoblotting. ( E ) BRET assay for the binding of PKMYT1 and CDK1 (plasmid design strategy is shown on left) measured in the indicated cells transfected with Halo-tagged CDK1 and Nluc-tagged PKMYT1 in the absence or presence of ODF2L. ( F ) Analysis of the binding of CDK1 and PKMYT1 to the C-terminally, middle-range, and N-terminally truncated ODF2L by coimmunoprecipitation. The indicated cells were cotransfected with Myc-PKMYT1, CDK1-V5, or Flag-tagged truncated ODF2L domains. ( G and H ) Analysis of cell viability upon AZD1775 treatment with or without ODF2L knockdown upon overexpression of PKMYT1 ( G ) or knockdown of PKMYT1 ( H ). AZD1775 (A2780, 200 nM; SKOV3, 200 nM). Data are the mean ± SD from 3 technical replicates in E , G , and H . Data are representative of 2 ( B ), 2 ( C ), 2 ( D ), 3 ( E ), 2 ( F ), 2 ( G ), and 2 ( H ) independent biological experiments. Blots shown were run in parallel, contemporaneously using the same cell lysate harvested from 1 representative experiment for each cell line in H . ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, and **** P < 0.0001, by 1-way ANOVA.

    Journal: The Journal of Clinical Investigation

    Article Title: ODF2L acts as a synthetic lethal partner with WEE1 inhibition in epithelial ovarian cancer models

    doi: 10.1172/JCI161544

    Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) Analysis of correlations between CDK1 expression levels and those of WEE1, PKMYT1, and ODF2L using TCGA OV data. ( B ) Analysis of the endogenous interaction between ODF2L and PKMYT1 by reverse coimmunoprecipitation followed by immunoblotting. ( C and D ) Analysis of the interaction between CDK1 and PKMYT1 in ODF2L-knockdown EOC cells ( C ) and the interaction between CDK1 and ODF2L in PKMYT1 knockdown EOC cells ( D ) by immunoprecipitation of endogenous CDK1 followed by immunoblotting. ( E ) BRET assay for the binding of PKMYT1 and CDK1 (plasmid design strategy is shown on left) measured in the indicated cells transfected with Halo-tagged CDK1 and Nluc-tagged PKMYT1 in the absence or presence of ODF2L. ( F ) Analysis of the binding of CDK1 and PKMYT1 to the C-terminally, middle-range, and N-terminally truncated ODF2L by coimmunoprecipitation. The indicated cells were cotransfected with Myc-PKMYT1, CDK1-V5, or Flag-tagged truncated ODF2L domains. ( G and H ) Analysis of cell viability upon AZD1775 treatment with or without ODF2L knockdown upon overexpression of PKMYT1 ( G ) or knockdown of PKMYT1 ( H ). AZD1775 (A2780, 200 nM; SKOV3, 200 nM). Data are the mean ± SD from 3 technical replicates in E , G , and H . Data are representative of 2 ( B ), 2 ( C ), 2 ( D ), 3 ( E ), 2 ( F ), 2 ( G ), and 2 ( H ) independent biological experiments. Blots shown were run in parallel, contemporaneously using the same cell lysate harvested from 1 representative experiment for each cell line in H . ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, and **** P < 0.0001, by 1-way ANOVA.

    Article Snippet: In the immunoblots using the whole-cell lysate, antibodies against p-ATM (Ser1981) (catalog 5883); ATM (catalog 2873); p-CHK2 (Thr68) (catalog 2197), CHK2 (catalog 6334); p-RPA32/RPA2 S8 (catalog 83745); RPA32/RPA2 (catalog 35869); p-CDK1 (Tyr15) (catalog 4539); p-CDK1 T14 (catalog 2543); CDK1 (catalog 77055); p–histone γH2AX (Ser139) (catalog 9718); and PKMYT1 (catalog 4282) were all obtained from Cell Signaling Technology.

    Techniques: Expressing, Western Blot, Immunoprecipitation, Bioluminescence Resonance Energy Transfer, Binding Assay, Plasmid Preparation, Transfection, Over Expression

    ( A and B ) In vitro CDK1 activity, total ODF2L expression levels ( A ) and cell viability ( B ) were analyzed in AZD1775-treated EOC cells derived from the primary tumor tissue of 57 ovarian cancer patients. Patient 1 was used as a control for different batches and labeled blue. ( C and D ) Analysis of correlations between ODF2L expression levels and CDK1 activity ( C ) or cell viability ( D ) in AZD1775-treated primary EOC cells. ODF2L expression levels and CDK1 activity were measured by quantification of the blots in A using ImageJ software. ( E ) Effect of ODF2L expression levels on in vivo tumor growth of PDXs treated with AZD1775. Tumor tissue from patients 1, 5, and 10; patients 3 and 21; and patients 33 and 36 were chosen for the xenograft on the basis of the differential expression levels of ODF2L in the primary cells confirmed by Western blotting. Mice were evenly grouped when the volume of their tumors reached approximately 100 mm 3 25 days after xenografting and were treated with vehicle or AZD1775 (40 mg/kg, orally, once per day). ID, identification. Data are representative of 2 ( A ) and 3 ( B ) independent biological experiments and represent the mean ± SD of 3 technical replicates of each sample ( B ). Error bars in E represent the SEM for tumor volume ( n = 6). ** P < 0.01 and *** P < 0.0001, by 2-tailed Pearson’s correlation coefficient ( C and D ), 2-way ANOVA for tumor volume ( E ), and 1-way ANOVA for tumor weight ( F ).

    Journal: The Journal of Clinical Investigation

    Article Title: ODF2L acts as a synthetic lethal partner with WEE1 inhibition in epithelial ovarian cancer models

    doi: 10.1172/JCI161544

    Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A and B ) In vitro CDK1 activity, total ODF2L expression levels ( A ) and cell viability ( B ) were analyzed in AZD1775-treated EOC cells derived from the primary tumor tissue of 57 ovarian cancer patients. Patient 1 was used as a control for different batches and labeled blue. ( C and D ) Analysis of correlations between ODF2L expression levels and CDK1 activity ( C ) or cell viability ( D ) in AZD1775-treated primary EOC cells. ODF2L expression levels and CDK1 activity were measured by quantification of the blots in A using ImageJ software. ( E ) Effect of ODF2L expression levels on in vivo tumor growth of PDXs treated with AZD1775. Tumor tissue from patients 1, 5, and 10; patients 3 and 21; and patients 33 and 36 were chosen for the xenograft on the basis of the differential expression levels of ODF2L in the primary cells confirmed by Western blotting. Mice were evenly grouped when the volume of their tumors reached approximately 100 mm 3 25 days after xenografting and were treated with vehicle or AZD1775 (40 mg/kg, orally, once per day). ID, identification. Data are representative of 2 ( A ) and 3 ( B ) independent biological experiments and represent the mean ± SD of 3 technical replicates of each sample ( B ). Error bars in E represent the SEM for tumor volume ( n = 6). ** P < 0.01 and *** P < 0.0001, by 2-tailed Pearson’s correlation coefficient ( C and D ), 2-way ANOVA for tumor volume ( E ), and 1-way ANOVA for tumor weight ( F ).

    Article Snippet: In the immunoblots using the whole-cell lysate, antibodies against p-ATM (Ser1981) (catalog 5883); ATM (catalog 2873); p-CHK2 (Thr68) (catalog 2197), CHK2 (catalog 6334); p-RPA32/RPA2 S8 (catalog 83745); RPA32/RPA2 (catalog 35869); p-CDK1 (Tyr15) (catalog 4539); p-CDK1 T14 (catalog 2543); CDK1 (catalog 77055); p–histone γH2AX (Ser139) (catalog 9718); and PKMYT1 (catalog 4282) were all obtained from Cell Signaling Technology.

    Techniques: In Vitro, Activity Assay, Expressing, Derivative Assay, Labeling, Software, In Vivo, Western Blot

    ( A ) Schematic illustration of targeted LNP against ovarian ID8 cells using the ASSET platform (upper panel) and experimental design (lower panel). ( B and C ) Effect of combination treatment with siODF2L-LNP and AZD1775 on ID8 tumor growth. In vivo bioluminescence image ( B ) and average photonic flux ( C ) at week 7. LNPs (0.75 mg/kg, twice a week); AZD1775 (30 mg/kg, orally, once per day). n = 10. ( D ) Survival curves of ID8-bearing mice in the indicated groups. n = 10. ( E ) Quantification of peritoneal ID8 tumor nodule numbers in mice at the endpoint. ( F and G ) In vitro CDK1 activity and total ODF2L expression levels were analyzed by Western blotting ( F ), and the level of the DNA damage marker γH2AX was analyzed ( G ) by flow cytometry in the 2 or 3 ID8 tumors harvested from mice in each group at the endpoint. Data represent the mean ± SD; n = 10 ( B – E ). Data are the mean ± SD; n = 2 or n = 3 ( G ). Data are representative of 2 ( F ) and 3 ( G ) independent biological experiments. ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, and **** P < 0.0001, by 1-way ANOVA.

    Journal: The Journal of Clinical Investigation

    Article Title: ODF2L acts as a synthetic lethal partner with WEE1 inhibition in epithelial ovarian cancer models

    doi: 10.1172/JCI161544

    Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) Schematic illustration of targeted LNP against ovarian ID8 cells using the ASSET platform (upper panel) and experimental design (lower panel). ( B and C ) Effect of combination treatment with siODF2L-LNP and AZD1775 on ID8 tumor growth. In vivo bioluminescence image ( B ) and average photonic flux ( C ) at week 7. LNPs (0.75 mg/kg, twice a week); AZD1775 (30 mg/kg, orally, once per day). n = 10. ( D ) Survival curves of ID8-bearing mice in the indicated groups. n = 10. ( E ) Quantification of peritoneal ID8 tumor nodule numbers in mice at the endpoint. ( F and G ) In vitro CDK1 activity and total ODF2L expression levels were analyzed by Western blotting ( F ), and the level of the DNA damage marker γH2AX was analyzed ( G ) by flow cytometry in the 2 or 3 ID8 tumors harvested from mice in each group at the endpoint. Data represent the mean ± SD; n = 10 ( B – E ). Data are the mean ± SD; n = 2 or n = 3 ( G ). Data are representative of 2 ( F ) and 3 ( G ) independent biological experiments. ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, and **** P < 0.0001, by 1-way ANOVA.

    Article Snippet: In the immunoblots using the whole-cell lysate, antibodies against p-ATM (Ser1981) (catalog 5883); ATM (catalog 2873); p-CHK2 (Thr68) (catalog 2197), CHK2 (catalog 6334); p-RPA32/RPA2 S8 (catalog 83745); RPA32/RPA2 (catalog 35869); p-CDK1 (Tyr15) (catalog 4539); p-CDK1 T14 (catalog 2543); CDK1 (catalog 77055); p–histone γH2AX (Ser139) (catalog 9718); and PKMYT1 (catalog 4282) were all obtained from Cell Signaling Technology.

    Techniques: In Vivo, In Vitro, Activity Assay, Expressing, Western Blot, Marker, Flow Cytometry

    Increased expression of cell cycle regulatory proteins in AD transgenic mice : A) Cyclin E, E2F1 and P-cdc2 levels are upregulated in transgenic mice expressing APP and PS/APP: Brain sections from Ntg normal mice (a, c, f) were compared to those from transgenic mice expressing APP (d, g) and PS/APP (b, e, h) using cyclin E (upper panel), E2F1 (middle panel) or P-cdc2 (lower panel) antibodies. Images (a-e, 5× and f-h 20×) were taken using a Nikon E1000 microscope and analyzed using Image-Pro Plus software. The P-cdc2 and images in the inset show magnified images (20×) of the plaques to visualize the cells. We found that the cells surrounding the plaques were positive for cyclin E, E2F1, and P-cdc2, and it appears that both neurons (black arrow head) and glia (white arrow head) were positive for P-cdc2. 'Secondary antibodies only' control did not show any specific staining of the sections (data not shown). B) Quantitative analysis of cyclin D1 and E expression in APP and PS/APP transgenic mice brains: Brain sections from Ntg and mice expressing APP and PS/APP were stained using a monoclonal cyclin D1 or a polyclonal cyclin E antibody and nuclei visualized using Hoechst. The signal intensity was measured using Image J, image processing and analysis program. The signal strength was compared to that with Hoechst nuclear staining from each section to avoid mouse-to-mouse variation. The means of results from six independent mice are shown with standard error bars and P values. While APP mice showed a significantly higher level of only cyclin E compared to cyclin D1, PS/APP mice showed higher levels of both cyclin D1 and E levels compared to Ntg.

    Journal: Molecular Neurodegeneration

    Article Title: Mitosis-specific phosphorylation of amyloid precursor protein at Threonine 668 leads to its altered processing and association with centrosomes

    doi: 10.1186/1750-1326-6-80

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Increased expression of cell cycle regulatory proteins in AD transgenic mice : A) Cyclin E, E2F1 and P-cdc2 levels are upregulated in transgenic mice expressing APP and PS/APP: Brain sections from Ntg normal mice (a, c, f) were compared to those from transgenic mice expressing APP (d, g) and PS/APP (b, e, h) using cyclin E (upper panel), E2F1 (middle panel) or P-cdc2 (lower panel) antibodies. Images (a-e, 5× and f-h 20×) were taken using a Nikon E1000 microscope and analyzed using Image-Pro Plus software. The P-cdc2 and images in the inset show magnified images (20×) of the plaques to visualize the cells. We found that the cells surrounding the plaques were positive for cyclin E, E2F1, and P-cdc2, and it appears that both neurons (black arrow head) and glia (white arrow head) were positive for P-cdc2. 'Secondary antibodies only' control did not show any specific staining of the sections (data not shown). B) Quantitative analysis of cyclin D1 and E expression in APP and PS/APP transgenic mice brains: Brain sections from Ntg and mice expressing APP and PS/APP were stained using a monoclonal cyclin D1 or a polyclonal cyclin E antibody and nuclei visualized using Hoechst. The signal intensity was measured using Image J, image processing and analysis program. The signal strength was compared to that with Hoechst nuclear staining from each section to avoid mouse-to-mouse variation. The means of results from six independent mice are shown with standard error bars and P values. While APP mice showed a significantly higher level of only cyclin E compared to cyclin D1, PS/APP mice showed higher levels of both cyclin D1 and E levels compared to Ntg.

    Article Snippet: Anti-Aβ/APP antibody (6E10 raised against Aβ1-16) was from Signet, C-terminal APP antibody was from Chemicon/Millipore, Thr668 P-APP, MPM-2, and P-cdc2 antibodies were from Cell Signaling, and cyclin D1, cyclin E, and E2F1 antibodies were from Santa Cruz Biotechnology.

    Techniques: Expressing, Transgenic Assay, Microscopy, Software, Staining