mouse monoclonal antibodies against fabp3 (Hycult Biotech)
Hycult Biotech is a verified supplier 
Hycult Biotech manufactures this product 
92
Structured Review
Hycult Biotech
mouse monoclonal antibodies against fabp3
Mouse Monoclonal Antibodies Against Fabp3, supplied by Hycult Biotech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse monoclonal antibodies against fabp3/product/Hycult Biotech
Average 92 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
Mouse Monoclonal Antibodies Against Fabp3, supplied by Hycult Biotech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse monoclonal antibodies against fabp3/product/Hycult Biotech
Average 92 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
mouse monoclonal antibodies against fabp3 - by Bioz Stars,
2023-09
92/100 stars
Images
1) Product Images from "FABP3 in the Anterior Cingulate Cortex Modulates the Methylation Status of the Glutamic Acid Decarboxylase 67 Promoter Region"
Article Title: FABP3 in the Anterior Cingulate Cortex Modulates the Methylation Status of the Glutamic Acid Decarboxylase 67 Promoter Region
Journal: The Journal of Neuroscience
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1285-18.2018
Figure Legend Snippet: FABP3 was strongly expressed in PV+ GABAergic interneurons of the ACC. A, Left, RT-PCR analysis of Fabp3 in different brain areas. Right, qPCR analysis of Fabp3 in different brain areas. Error bar indicates mean ± SEM. n = 6 mice per group. **p < 0.01 versus WT ACC. B–F, Confocal images showing colocalization of FABP3 and a pyramidal neuronal marker (Ng), three classical GABAergic neuronal makers (PV, SOM, and CR), or GAD67 in the ACC. B, Most FABP3+ structures do not show immunoreactivity for Ng. C, Confocal images showing FABP3 and PV colocalization in the ACC. D, F, Most FABP+ structures do not show immunoreactivity for SOM (D) or CR (E). F, Confocal images showing FABP3 and GAD67 colocalization in the ACC (arrowheads). B, C (bottom), D, E (bottom right), F (right), Enlarged images of the boxed area in the merged image. Scale bars, 50 μm. Str, Striatum.
Techniques Used: Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction, Marker
Figure Legend Snippet: Colocalization of PV, SOM, and CR with FABP3 in the ACC a
Techniques Used:
Figure Legend Snippet: Fabp3 gene ablation in the ACC caused upregulation of GAD67 expression and GABA synthesis. A, Quantitative analysis of the number of PV−, SOM−, and CR+ neurons in the ACC. PV, n = 8 sections, 4 mice; SOM, n = 12 sections, 6 mice; CR, n = 12 sections, 6 mice per group. B, Representative immunoblots (left) and quantitative densitometry analysis (right) probed with GABA-related antibodies. GAD67 and β-actin, n = 6 mice per group; GAD65, VGAT, and GABAAR, n = 5 mice per group; gephyrin, n = 5 and 6 WT and Fabp3 KO mice, respectively. C, Quantitative analysis of Gad67 mRNA expression in the ACC from WT and Fabp3 KO mice. n = 4 mice per group. D, Quantitative analysis of the GABA concentrations in ACC extracts from WT and Fabp3 KO mice by ELISA. n = 6 mice per group. E–G, There were no differences in GAD67 expression or GABA synthesis in the mPFC or AM of Fabp3 KO mice. E, Representative immunoblots (left) and quantitative densitometry analysis (right) probed with GAD67 antibody. n = 4 mice per group. F, Quantitative analysis of the Gad67 mRNA expression. n = 4 mice per group. G, Quantitative analysis of the GABA concentrations in the mPFC and AM extracts by ELISA. mPFC, n = 6 mice per group; AM, n = 4 and 6 WT and Fabp3 KO mice, respectively. H, I, Quantitative analysis of the DA and 5-HT concentrations in ACC extracts by ELISA. 5-HT, n = 6 mice per group; DA, n = 6 and 5 WT and Fabp3 KO mice, respectively. A–I, **p < 0.01 versus WT mice. J, Left, Representative immunoblots probed with FABP3 antibody. Right, Quantitative analysis of Gad67 mRNA in Neuro-2a cells. n = 4 per group. **p < 0.01 versus control. mock, Mock control; OE, Fabp3 overexpression; NC, negative control; KD, Fabp3 knockdown. Error bar indicates mean ± SEM.
Techniques Used: Expressing, Western Blot, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Over Expression, Negative Control
Figure Legend Snippet: Enhancement of inhibitory synaptic plasticity in the ACC of Fabp3 KO mice. A, Representative traces of mEPSCs and mIPSCs in ACC layer II/III pyramidal neurons. B, Plots of the mEPSC and mIPSC frequencies in WT and Fabp3 KO mice. C, Plots of the mEPSC and mIPSC amplitudes in WT and Fabp3 KO mice. n = 53 cells for WT and 59 cells for Fabp3 KO from 5 mice for mEPSCs. n = 52 cells for WT and 60 cells for Fabp3 KO from 5 mice for mIPSCs. **p < 0.01 versus WT mice. Error bar indicates mean ± SEM.
Techniques Used:
Figure Legend Snippet: Extracellular glutamate (Glu) concentrations in the ACC in freely moving animals. A, Dialysate Glu concentrations at baseline (basal) and after depolarization stimulation (High-K+) (left). Glu AUC before (basal) and after (High-K+) depolarization stimulation (right). *p < 0.05 versus wild-type mice. B, Normalization of the dialysate Glu signals indicated that the response to depolarization stimulation was enhanced in Fabp3 KO mice (left). The normalized Glu AUC after depolarization stimulation (right). A, B, Error bar indicates mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05 versus WT mice. n = 6 WT mice; n = 5 Fabp3 KO mice. C, D, Representative immunoblots (left) and quantitative densitometry analysis (right) probed with various antibodies. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01 versus WT mice. n = 6 mice per group. Error bar indicates mean ± SEM.
Techniques Used: Western Blot
Figure Legend Snippet: Decreased binding of MeCP2 and HDAC1 to the Gad67 promoter region in the ACC of Fabp3 KO mice. A, Representative immunoblots (top) and quantitative densitometry analysis (bottom) probed with various antibodies are shown. n = 6 mice per group. B, ChIP assay of ACC extracts from WT or Fabp3 KO mice via anti-MeCP2 and HDAC1. The precipitated DNA was analyzed by qPCR with primers amplifying the Gad67 promoter region. **p < 0.01 versus WT mice. n = 5 WT mice. n = 4 Fabp3 KO mice. C, DNA methylation profile in the Gad67 promoter region determined by bisulfite sequencing. Black circles represent methylated CpGs. Open circles represent unmethylated sites. Top numbers indicate global percentages of methylated cytosines. D, Quantitative analysis of the Gad67 mRNA expression in the ACC. WT, n = 6; KO, n = 5; KO + MET, n = 6 mice per group. **p < 0.01 versus WT mice. ##p < 0.01 versus KO mice. E, F, Quantitative analysis of the SAM concentration by ELISA. n = 4 per group. **p < 0.01 versus mock control. MET treatment (5.2 mmol/kg, s.c., twice per day for 6 d). mock, Mock control; OE, Fabp3 overexpression. Error bar indicates mean ± SEM.
Techniques Used: Binding Assay, Western Blot, DNA Methylation Assay, Methylation Sequencing, Methylation, Expressing, Concentration Assay, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Over Expression
Figure Legend Snippet: Amelioration of behavioral abnormalities in Fabp3 KO mice by chronic treatment with MET. A, Schematic of the behavioral tests and MET treatment (5.2 mmol/kg, s.c., twice per day). During the behavioral testing period, mice received saline or MET once per day after testing. B, OFT. Graph represents the time spent in the center area over a 5 min period for WT and Fabp3 KO mice. n = 14–17 mice per group. C, HBT. An illustrative example of the travel pathway in the HBT using video tracking software (top). Graphs represent the time spent in the center area, total number of head-dips, head-dip duration, and latency to first head-dip for the 5 min testing session (bottom). n = 13–15 mice per group. **p < 0.01 versus saline-treated WT mice. ##p < 0.01 versus saline-treated KO mice. D, NORT. Differences in exploratory preference were assessed between groups in the training (left) or test (right) sessions. n = 11–15 mice per group. **p < 0.01 versus familiar group. Sal, Saline treatment. MET treatment (5.2 mmol/kg, s.c., twice per day for 6 d). Error bar indicates mean ± SEM.
Techniques Used: Software
Figure Legend Snippet: Locomotor activities during behavioral tests a
Techniques Used:
mouse monoclonal antibodies against fabp3 (Hycult Biotech)
Hycult Biotech is a verified supplier
Hycult Biotech manufactures this product
92
Structured Review
Hycult Biotech
mouse monoclonal antibodies against fabp3
Mouse Monoclonal Antibodies Against Fabp3, supplied by Hycult Biotech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse monoclonal antibodies against fabp3/product/Hycult Biotech
Average 92 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
Mouse Monoclonal Antibodies Against Fabp3, supplied by Hycult Biotech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse monoclonal antibodies against fabp3/product/Hycult Biotech
Average 92 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
mouse monoclonal antibodies against fabp3 - by Bioz Stars,
2023-09
92/100 stars
Images
1) Product Images from "FABP3 in the Anterior Cingulate Cortex Modulates the Methylation Status of the Glutamic Acid Decarboxylase 67 Promoter Region"
Article Title: FABP3 in the Anterior Cingulate Cortex Modulates the Methylation Status of the Glutamic Acid Decarboxylase 67 Promoter Region
Journal: The Journal of Neuroscience
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1285-18.2018
Figure Legend Snippet: FABP3 was strongly expressed in PV+ GABAergic interneurons of the ACC. A, Left, RT-PCR analysis of Fabp3 in different brain areas. Right, qPCR analysis of Fabp3 in different brain areas. Error bar indicates mean ± SEM. n = 6 mice per group. **p < 0.01 versus WT ACC. B–F, Confocal images showing colocalization of FABP3 and a pyramidal neuronal marker (Ng), three classical GABAergic neuronal makers (PV, SOM, and CR), or GAD67 in the ACC. B, Most FABP3+ structures do not show immunoreactivity for Ng. C, Confocal images showing FABP3 and PV colocalization in the ACC. D, F, Most FABP+ structures do not show immunoreactivity for SOM (D) or CR (E). F, Confocal images showing FABP3 and GAD67 colocalization in the ACC (arrowheads). B, C (bottom), D, E (bottom right), F (right), Enlarged images of the boxed area in the merged image. Scale bars, 50 μm. Str, Striatum.
Techniques Used: Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction, Marker
Figure Legend Snippet: Colocalization of PV, SOM, and CR with FABP3 in the ACC a
Techniques Used:
Figure Legend Snippet: Fabp3 gene ablation in the ACC caused upregulation of GAD67 expression and GABA synthesis. A, Quantitative analysis of the number of PV−, SOM−, and CR+ neurons in the ACC. PV, n = 8 sections, 4 mice; SOM, n = 12 sections, 6 mice; CR, n = 12 sections, 6 mice per group. B, Representative immunoblots (left) and quantitative densitometry analysis (right) probed with GABA-related antibodies. GAD67 and β-actin, n = 6 mice per group; GAD65, VGAT, and GABAAR, n = 5 mice per group; gephyrin, n = 5 and 6 WT and Fabp3 KO mice, respectively. C, Quantitative analysis of Gad67 mRNA expression in the ACC from WT and Fabp3 KO mice. n = 4 mice per group. D, Quantitative analysis of the GABA concentrations in ACC extracts from WT and Fabp3 KO mice by ELISA. n = 6 mice per group. E–G, There were no differences in GAD67 expression or GABA synthesis in the mPFC or AM of Fabp3 KO mice. E, Representative immunoblots (left) and quantitative densitometry analysis (right) probed with GAD67 antibody. n = 4 mice per group. F, Quantitative analysis of the Gad67 mRNA expression. n = 4 mice per group. G, Quantitative analysis of the GABA concentrations in the mPFC and AM extracts by ELISA. mPFC, n = 6 mice per group; AM, n = 4 and 6 WT and Fabp3 KO mice, respectively. H, I, Quantitative analysis of the DA and 5-HT concentrations in ACC extracts by ELISA. 5-HT, n = 6 mice per group; DA, n = 6 and 5 WT and Fabp3 KO mice, respectively. A–I, **p < 0.01 versus WT mice. J, Left, Representative immunoblots probed with FABP3 antibody. Right, Quantitative analysis of Gad67 mRNA in Neuro-2a cells. n = 4 per group. **p < 0.01 versus control. mock, Mock control; OE, Fabp3 overexpression; NC, negative control; KD, Fabp3 knockdown. Error bar indicates mean ± SEM.
Techniques Used: Expressing, Western Blot, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Over Expression, Negative Control
Figure Legend Snippet: Enhancement of inhibitory synaptic plasticity in the ACC of Fabp3 KO mice. A, Representative traces of mEPSCs and mIPSCs in ACC layer II/III pyramidal neurons. B, Plots of the mEPSC and mIPSC frequencies in WT and Fabp3 KO mice. C, Plots of the mEPSC and mIPSC amplitudes in WT and Fabp3 KO mice. n = 53 cells for WT and 59 cells for Fabp3 KO from 5 mice for mEPSCs. n = 52 cells for WT and 60 cells for Fabp3 KO from 5 mice for mIPSCs. **p < 0.01 versus WT mice. Error bar indicates mean ± SEM.
Techniques Used:
Figure Legend Snippet: Extracellular glutamate (Glu) concentrations in the ACC in freely moving animals. A, Dialysate Glu concentrations at baseline (basal) and after depolarization stimulation (High-K+) (left). Glu AUC before (basal) and after (High-K+) depolarization stimulation (right). *p < 0.05 versus wild-type mice. B, Normalization of the dialysate Glu signals indicated that the response to depolarization stimulation was enhanced in Fabp3 KO mice (left). The normalized Glu AUC after depolarization stimulation (right). A, B, Error bar indicates mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05 versus WT mice. n = 6 WT mice; n = 5 Fabp3 KO mice. C, D, Representative immunoblots (left) and quantitative densitometry analysis (right) probed with various antibodies. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01 versus WT mice. n = 6 mice per group. Error bar indicates mean ± SEM.
Techniques Used: Western Blot
Figure Legend Snippet: Decreased binding of MeCP2 and HDAC1 to the Gad67 promoter region in the ACC of Fabp3 KO mice. A, Representative immunoblots (top) and quantitative densitometry analysis (bottom) probed with various antibodies are shown. n = 6 mice per group. B, ChIP assay of ACC extracts from WT or Fabp3 KO mice via anti-MeCP2 and HDAC1. The precipitated DNA was analyzed by qPCR with primers amplifying the Gad67 promoter region. **p < 0.01 versus WT mice. n = 5 WT mice. n = 4 Fabp3 KO mice. C, DNA methylation profile in the Gad67 promoter region determined by bisulfite sequencing. Black circles represent methylated CpGs. Open circles represent unmethylated sites. Top numbers indicate global percentages of methylated cytosines. D, Quantitative analysis of the Gad67 mRNA expression in the ACC. WT, n = 6; KO, n = 5; KO + MET, n = 6 mice per group. **p < 0.01 versus WT mice. ##p < 0.01 versus KO mice. E, F, Quantitative analysis of the SAM concentration by ELISA. n = 4 per group. **p < 0.01 versus mock control. MET treatment (5.2 mmol/kg, s.c., twice per day for 6 d). mock, Mock control; OE, Fabp3 overexpression. Error bar indicates mean ± SEM.
Techniques Used: Binding Assay, Western Blot, DNA Methylation Assay, Methylation Sequencing, Methylation, Expressing, Concentration Assay, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Over Expression
Figure Legend Snippet: Amelioration of behavioral abnormalities in Fabp3 KO mice by chronic treatment with MET. A, Schematic of the behavioral tests and MET treatment (5.2 mmol/kg, s.c., twice per day). During the behavioral testing period, mice received saline or MET once per day after testing. B, OFT. Graph represents the time spent in the center area over a 5 min period for WT and Fabp3 KO mice. n = 14–17 mice per group. C, HBT. An illustrative example of the travel pathway in the HBT using video tracking software (top). Graphs represent the time spent in the center area, total number of head-dips, head-dip duration, and latency to first head-dip for the 5 min testing session (bottom). n = 13–15 mice per group. **p < 0.01 versus saline-treated WT mice. ##p < 0.01 versus saline-treated KO mice. D, NORT. Differences in exploratory preference were assessed between groups in the training (left) or test (right) sessions. n = 11–15 mice per group. **p < 0.01 versus familiar group. Sal, Saline treatment. MET treatment (5.2 mmol/kg, s.c., twice per day for 6 d). Error bar indicates mean ± SEM.
Techniques Used: Software
Figure Legend Snippet: Locomotor activities during behavioral tests a
Techniques Used:
mouse monoclonal antibodies against fabp3 (Hycult Biotech)
Hycult Biotech is a verified supplier
Hycult Biotech manufactures this product
86
Structured Review
Hycult Biotech
mouse monoclonal antibodies against fabp3
Mouse Monoclonal Antibodies Against Fabp3, supplied by Hycult Biotech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse monoclonal antibodies against fabp3/product/Hycult Biotech
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
Mouse Monoclonal Antibodies Against Fabp3, supplied by Hycult Biotech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse monoclonal antibodies against fabp3/product/Hycult Biotech
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
mouse monoclonal antibodies against fabp3 - by Bioz Stars,
2023-09
86/100 stars
Images
1) Product Images from "FABP3 in the Anterior Cingulate Cortex Modulates the Methylation Status of the Glutamic Acid Decarboxylase 67 Promoter Region"
Article Title: FABP3 in the Anterior Cingulate Cortex Modulates the Methylation Status of the Glutamic Acid Decarboxylase 67 Promoter Region
Journal: The Journal of Neuroscience
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1285-18.2018
Figure Legend Snippet: FABP3 was strongly expressed in PV+ GABAergic interneurons of the ACC. A, Left, RT-PCR analysis of Fabp3 in different brain areas. Right, qPCR analysis of Fabp3 in different brain areas. Error bar indicates mean ± SEM. n = 6 mice per group. **p < 0.01 versus WT ACC. B–F, Confocal images showing colocalization of FABP3 and a pyramidal neuronal marker (Ng), three classical GABAergic neuronal makers (PV, SOM, and CR), or GAD67 in the ACC. B, Most FABP3+ structures do not show immunoreactivity for Ng. C, Confocal images showing FABP3 and PV colocalization in the ACC. D, F, Most FABP+ structures do not show immunoreactivity for SOM (D) or CR (E). F, Confocal images showing FABP3 and GAD67 colocalization in the ACC (arrowheads). B, C (bottom), D, E (bottom right), F (right), Enlarged images of the boxed area in the merged image. Scale bars, 50 μm. Str, Striatum.
Techniques Used: Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction, Marker
Figure Legend Snippet: Colocalization of PV, SOM, and CR with FABP3 in the ACC a
Techniques Used:
Figure Legend Snippet: Fabp3 gene ablation in the ACC caused upregulation of GAD67 expression and GABA synthesis. A, Quantitative analysis of the number of PV−, SOM−, and CR+ neurons in the ACC. PV, n = 8 sections, 4 mice; SOM, n = 12 sections, 6 mice; CR, n = 12 sections, 6 mice per group. B, Representative immunoblots (left) and quantitative densitometry analysis (right) probed with GABA-related antibodies. GAD67 and β-actin, n = 6 mice per group; GAD65, VGAT, and GABAAR, n = 5 mice per group; gephyrin, n = 5 and 6 WT and Fabp3 KO mice, respectively. C, Quantitative analysis of Gad67 mRNA expression in the ACC from WT and Fabp3 KO mice. n = 4 mice per group. D, Quantitative analysis of the GABA concentrations in ACC extracts from WT and Fabp3 KO mice by ELISA. n = 6 mice per group. E–G, There were no differences in GAD67 expression or GABA synthesis in the mPFC or AM of Fabp3 KO mice. E, Representative immunoblots (left) and quantitative densitometry analysis (right) probed with GAD67 antibody. n = 4 mice per group. F, Quantitative analysis of the Gad67 mRNA expression. n = 4 mice per group. G, Quantitative analysis of the GABA concentrations in the mPFC and AM extracts by ELISA. mPFC, n = 6 mice per group; AM, n = 4 and 6 WT and Fabp3 KO mice, respectively. H, I, Quantitative analysis of the DA and 5-HT concentrations in ACC extracts by ELISA. 5-HT, n = 6 mice per group; DA, n = 6 and 5 WT and Fabp3 KO mice, respectively. A–I, **p < 0.01 versus WT mice. J, Left, Representative immunoblots probed with FABP3 antibody. Right, Quantitative analysis of Gad67 mRNA in Neuro-2a cells. n = 4 per group. **p < 0.01 versus control. mock, Mock control; OE, Fabp3 overexpression; NC, negative control; KD, Fabp3 knockdown. Error bar indicates mean ± SEM.
Techniques Used: Expressing, Western Blot, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Over Expression, Negative Control
Figure Legend Snippet: Enhancement of inhibitory synaptic plasticity in the ACC of Fabp3 KO mice. A, Representative traces of mEPSCs and mIPSCs in ACC layer II/III pyramidal neurons. B, Plots of the mEPSC and mIPSC frequencies in WT and Fabp3 KO mice. C, Plots of the mEPSC and mIPSC amplitudes in WT and Fabp3 KO mice. n = 53 cells for WT and 59 cells for Fabp3 KO from 5 mice for mEPSCs. n = 52 cells for WT and 60 cells for Fabp3 KO from 5 mice for mIPSCs. **p < 0.01 versus WT mice. Error bar indicates mean ± SEM.
Techniques Used:
Figure Legend Snippet: Extracellular glutamate (Glu) concentrations in the ACC in freely moving animals. A, Dialysate Glu concentrations at baseline (basal) and after depolarization stimulation (High-K+) (left). Glu AUC before (basal) and after (High-K+) depolarization stimulation (right). *p < 0.05 versus wild-type mice. B, Normalization of the dialysate Glu signals indicated that the response to depolarization stimulation was enhanced in Fabp3 KO mice (left). The normalized Glu AUC after depolarization stimulation (right). A, B, Error bar indicates mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05 versus WT mice. n = 6 WT mice; n = 5 Fabp3 KO mice. C, D, Representative immunoblots (left) and quantitative densitometry analysis (right) probed with various antibodies. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01 versus WT mice. n = 6 mice per group. Error bar indicates mean ± SEM.
Techniques Used: Western Blot
Figure Legend Snippet: Decreased binding of MeCP2 and HDAC1 to the Gad67 promoter region in the ACC of Fabp3 KO mice. A, Representative immunoblots (top) and quantitative densitometry analysis (bottom) probed with various antibodies are shown. n = 6 mice per group. B, ChIP assay of ACC extracts from WT or Fabp3 KO mice via anti-MeCP2 and HDAC1. The precipitated DNA was analyzed by qPCR with primers amplifying the Gad67 promoter region. **p < 0.01 versus WT mice. n = 5 WT mice. n = 4 Fabp3 KO mice. C, DNA methylation profile in the Gad67 promoter region determined by bisulfite sequencing. Black circles represent methylated CpGs. Open circles represent unmethylated sites. Top numbers indicate global percentages of methylated cytosines. D, Quantitative analysis of the Gad67 mRNA expression in the ACC. WT, n = 6; KO, n = 5; KO + MET, n = 6 mice per group. **p < 0.01 versus WT mice. ##p < 0.01 versus KO mice. E, F, Quantitative analysis of the SAM concentration by ELISA. n = 4 per group. **p < 0.01 versus mock control. MET treatment (5.2 mmol/kg, s.c., twice per day for 6 d). mock, Mock control; OE, Fabp3 overexpression. Error bar indicates mean ± SEM.
Techniques Used: Binding Assay, Western Blot, DNA Methylation Assay, Methylation Sequencing, Methylation, Expressing, Concentration Assay, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Over Expression
Figure Legend Snippet: Amelioration of behavioral abnormalities in Fabp3 KO mice by chronic treatment with MET. A, Schematic of the behavioral tests and MET treatment (5.2 mmol/kg, s.c., twice per day). During the behavioral testing period, mice received saline or MET once per day after testing. B, OFT. Graph represents the time spent in the center area over a 5 min period for WT and Fabp3 KO mice. n = 14–17 mice per group. C, HBT. An illustrative example of the travel pathway in the HBT using video tracking software (top). Graphs represent the time spent in the center area, total number of head-dips, head-dip duration, and latency to first head-dip for the 5 min testing session (bottom). n = 13–15 mice per group. **p < 0.01 versus saline-treated WT mice. ##p < 0.01 versus saline-treated KO mice. D, NORT. Differences in exploratory preference were assessed between groups in the training (left) or test (right) sessions. n = 11–15 mice per group. **p < 0.01 versus familiar group. Sal, Saline treatment. MET treatment (5.2 mmol/kg, s.c., twice per day for 6 d). Error bar indicates mean ± SEM.
Techniques Used: Software
Figure Legend Snippet: Locomotor activities during behavioral tests a
Techniques Used:
mouse monoclonal antibodies against fabp3 (Hycult Biotech)
Hycult Biotech is a verified supplier
Hycult Biotech manufactures this product
86
Structured Review
Hycult Biotech
mouse monoclonal antibodies against fabp3
Mouse Monoclonal Antibodies Against Fabp3, supplied by Hycult Biotech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse monoclonal antibodies against fabp3/product/Hycult Biotech
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
Mouse Monoclonal Antibodies Against Fabp3, supplied by Hycult Biotech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse monoclonal antibodies against fabp3/product/Hycult Biotech
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
mouse monoclonal antibodies against fabp3 - by Bioz Stars,
2023-09
86/100 stars
Images
1) Product Images from "FABP3 in the Anterior Cingulate Cortex Modulates the Methylation Status of the Glutamic Acid Decarboxylase 67 Promoter Region"
Article Title: FABP3 in the Anterior Cingulate Cortex Modulates the Methylation Status of the Glutamic Acid Decarboxylase 67 Promoter Region
Journal: The Journal of Neuroscience
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1285-18.2018
Figure Legend Snippet: FABP3 was strongly expressed in PV+ GABAergic interneurons of the ACC. A, Left, RT-PCR analysis of Fabp3 in different brain areas. Right, qPCR analysis of Fabp3 in different brain areas. Error bar indicates mean ± SEM. n = 6 mice per group. **p < 0.01 versus WT ACC. B–F, Confocal images showing colocalization of FABP3 and a pyramidal neuronal marker (Ng), three classical GABAergic neuronal makers (PV, SOM, and CR), or GAD67 in the ACC. B, Most FABP3+ structures do not show immunoreactivity for Ng. C, Confocal images showing FABP3 and PV colocalization in the ACC. D, F, Most FABP+ structures do not show immunoreactivity for SOM (D) or CR (E). F, Confocal images showing FABP3 and GAD67 colocalization in the ACC (arrowheads). B, C (bottom), D, E (bottom right), F (right), Enlarged images of the boxed area in the merged image. Scale bars, 50 μm. Str, Striatum.
Techniques Used: Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction, Marker
Figure Legend Snippet: Colocalization of PV, SOM, and CR with FABP3 in the ACC a
Techniques Used:
Figure Legend Snippet: Fabp3 gene ablation in the ACC caused upregulation of GAD67 expression and GABA synthesis. A, Quantitative analysis of the number of PV−, SOM−, and CR+ neurons in the ACC. PV, n = 8 sections, 4 mice; SOM, n = 12 sections, 6 mice; CR, n = 12 sections, 6 mice per group. B, Representative immunoblots (left) and quantitative densitometry analysis (right) probed with GABA-related antibodies. GAD67 and β-actin, n = 6 mice per group; GAD65, VGAT, and GABAAR, n = 5 mice per group; gephyrin, n = 5 and 6 WT and Fabp3 KO mice, respectively. C, Quantitative analysis of Gad67 mRNA expression in the ACC from WT and Fabp3 KO mice. n = 4 mice per group. D, Quantitative analysis of the GABA concentrations in ACC extracts from WT and Fabp3 KO mice by ELISA. n = 6 mice per group. E–G, There were no differences in GAD67 expression or GABA synthesis in the mPFC or AM of Fabp3 KO mice. E, Representative immunoblots (left) and quantitative densitometry analysis (right) probed with GAD67 antibody. n = 4 mice per group. F, Quantitative analysis of the Gad67 mRNA expression. n = 4 mice per group. G, Quantitative analysis of the GABA concentrations in the mPFC and AM extracts by ELISA. mPFC, n = 6 mice per group; AM, n = 4 and 6 WT and Fabp3 KO mice, respectively. H, I, Quantitative analysis of the DA and 5-HT concentrations in ACC extracts by ELISA. 5-HT, n = 6 mice per group; DA, n = 6 and 5 WT and Fabp3 KO mice, respectively. A–I, **p < 0.01 versus WT mice. J, Left, Representative immunoblots probed with FABP3 antibody. Right, Quantitative analysis of Gad67 mRNA in Neuro-2a cells. n = 4 per group. **p < 0.01 versus control. mock, Mock control; OE, Fabp3 overexpression; NC, negative control; KD, Fabp3 knockdown. Error bar indicates mean ± SEM.
Techniques Used: Expressing, Western Blot, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Over Expression, Negative Control
Figure Legend Snippet: Enhancement of inhibitory synaptic plasticity in the ACC of Fabp3 KO mice. A, Representative traces of mEPSCs and mIPSCs in ACC layer II/III pyramidal neurons. B, Plots of the mEPSC and mIPSC frequencies in WT and Fabp3 KO mice. C, Plots of the mEPSC and mIPSC amplitudes in WT and Fabp3 KO mice. n = 53 cells for WT and 59 cells for Fabp3 KO from 5 mice for mEPSCs. n = 52 cells for WT and 60 cells for Fabp3 KO from 5 mice for mIPSCs. **p < 0.01 versus WT mice. Error bar indicates mean ± SEM.
Techniques Used:
Figure Legend Snippet: Extracellular glutamate (Glu) concentrations in the ACC in freely moving animals. A, Dialysate Glu concentrations at baseline (basal) and after depolarization stimulation (High-K+) (left). Glu AUC before (basal) and after (High-K+) depolarization stimulation (right). *p < 0.05 versus wild-type mice. B, Normalization of the dialysate Glu signals indicated that the response to depolarization stimulation was enhanced in Fabp3 KO mice (left). The normalized Glu AUC after depolarization stimulation (right). A, B, Error bar indicates mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05 versus WT mice. n = 6 WT mice; n = 5 Fabp3 KO mice. C, D, Representative immunoblots (left) and quantitative densitometry analysis (right) probed with various antibodies. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01 versus WT mice. n = 6 mice per group. Error bar indicates mean ± SEM.
Techniques Used: Western Blot
Figure Legend Snippet: Decreased binding of MeCP2 and HDAC1 to the Gad67 promoter region in the ACC of Fabp3 KO mice. A, Representative immunoblots (top) and quantitative densitometry analysis (bottom) probed with various antibodies are shown. n = 6 mice per group. B, ChIP assay of ACC extracts from WT or Fabp3 KO mice via anti-MeCP2 and HDAC1. The precipitated DNA was analyzed by qPCR with primers amplifying the Gad67 promoter region. **p < 0.01 versus WT mice. n = 5 WT mice. n = 4 Fabp3 KO mice. C, DNA methylation profile in the Gad67 promoter region determined by bisulfite sequencing. Black circles represent methylated CpGs. Open circles represent unmethylated sites. Top numbers indicate global percentages of methylated cytosines. D, Quantitative analysis of the Gad67 mRNA expression in the ACC. WT, n = 6; KO, n = 5; KO + MET, n = 6 mice per group. **p < 0.01 versus WT mice. ##p < 0.01 versus KO mice. E, F, Quantitative analysis of the SAM concentration by ELISA. n = 4 per group. **p < 0.01 versus mock control. MET treatment (5.2 mmol/kg, s.c., twice per day for 6 d). mock, Mock control; OE, Fabp3 overexpression. Error bar indicates mean ± SEM.
Techniques Used: Binding Assay, Western Blot, DNA Methylation Assay, Methylation Sequencing, Methylation, Expressing, Concentration Assay, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Over Expression
Figure Legend Snippet: Amelioration of behavioral abnormalities in Fabp3 KO mice by chronic treatment with MET. A, Schematic of the behavioral tests and MET treatment (5.2 mmol/kg, s.c., twice per day). During the behavioral testing period, mice received saline or MET once per day after testing. B, OFT. Graph represents the time spent in the center area over a 5 min period for WT and Fabp3 KO mice. n = 14–17 mice per group. C, HBT. An illustrative example of the travel pathway in the HBT using video tracking software (top). Graphs represent the time spent in the center area, total number of head-dips, head-dip duration, and latency to first head-dip for the 5 min testing session (bottom). n = 13–15 mice per group. **p < 0.01 versus saline-treated WT mice. ##p < 0.01 versus saline-treated KO mice. D, NORT. Differences in exploratory preference were assessed between groups in the training (left) or test (right) sessions. n = 11–15 mice per group. **p < 0.01 versus familiar group. Sal, Saline treatment. MET treatment (5.2 mmol/kg, s.c., twice per day for 6 d). Error bar indicates mean ± SEM.
Techniques Used: Software
Figure Legend Snippet: Locomotor activities during behavioral tests a
Techniques Used:
mouse monoclonal antibodies against fabp3 (Hycult Biotech)
Hycult Biotech is a verified supplier
Hycult Biotech manufactures this product
86
Structured Review
Hycult Biotech
mouse monoclonal antibodies against fabp3
Mouse Monoclonal Antibodies Against Fabp3, supplied by Hycult Biotech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse monoclonal antibodies against fabp3/product/Hycult Biotech
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
Mouse Monoclonal Antibodies Against Fabp3, supplied by Hycult Biotech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse monoclonal antibodies against fabp3/product/Hycult Biotech
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
mouse monoclonal antibodies against fabp3 - by Bioz Stars,
2023-09
86/100 stars
Images
1) Product Images from "FABP3 in the Anterior Cingulate Cortex Modulates the Methylation Status of the Glutamic Acid Decarboxylase 67 Promoter Region"
Article Title: FABP3 in the Anterior Cingulate Cortex Modulates the Methylation Status of the Glutamic Acid Decarboxylase 67 Promoter Region
Journal: The Journal of Neuroscience
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1285-18.2018
Figure Legend Snippet: FABP3 was strongly expressed in PV+ GABAergic interneurons of the ACC. A, Left, RT-PCR analysis of Fabp3 in different brain areas. Right, qPCR analysis of Fabp3 in different brain areas. Error bar indicates mean ± SEM. n = 6 mice per group. **p < 0.01 versus WT ACC. B–F, Confocal images showing colocalization of FABP3 and a pyramidal neuronal marker (Ng), three classical GABAergic neuronal makers (PV, SOM, and CR), or GAD67 in the ACC. B, Most FABP3+ structures do not show immunoreactivity for Ng. C, Confocal images showing FABP3 and PV colocalization in the ACC. D, F, Most FABP+ structures do not show immunoreactivity for SOM (D) or CR (E). F, Confocal images showing FABP3 and GAD67 colocalization in the ACC (arrowheads). B, C (bottom), D, E (bottom right), F (right), Enlarged images of the boxed area in the merged image. Scale bars, 50 μm. Str, Striatum.
Techniques Used: Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction, Marker
Figure Legend Snippet: Colocalization of PV, SOM, and CR with FABP3 in the ACC a
Techniques Used:
Figure Legend Snippet: Fabp3 gene ablation in the ACC caused upregulation of GAD67 expression and GABA synthesis. A, Quantitative analysis of the number of PV−, SOM−, and CR+ neurons in the ACC. PV, n = 8 sections, 4 mice; SOM, n = 12 sections, 6 mice; CR, n = 12 sections, 6 mice per group. B, Representative immunoblots (left) and quantitative densitometry analysis (right) probed with GABA-related antibodies. GAD67 and β-actin, n = 6 mice per group; GAD65, VGAT, and GABAAR, n = 5 mice per group; gephyrin, n = 5 and 6 WT and Fabp3 KO mice, respectively. C, Quantitative analysis of Gad67 mRNA expression in the ACC from WT and Fabp3 KO mice. n = 4 mice per group. D, Quantitative analysis of the GABA concentrations in ACC extracts from WT and Fabp3 KO mice by ELISA. n = 6 mice per group. E–G, There were no differences in GAD67 expression or GABA synthesis in the mPFC or AM of Fabp3 KO mice. E, Representative immunoblots (left) and quantitative densitometry analysis (right) probed with GAD67 antibody. n = 4 mice per group. F, Quantitative analysis of the Gad67 mRNA expression. n = 4 mice per group. G, Quantitative analysis of the GABA concentrations in the mPFC and AM extracts by ELISA. mPFC, n = 6 mice per group; AM, n = 4 and 6 WT and Fabp3 KO mice, respectively. H, I, Quantitative analysis of the DA and 5-HT concentrations in ACC extracts by ELISA. 5-HT, n = 6 mice per group; DA, n = 6 and 5 WT and Fabp3 KO mice, respectively. A–I, **p < 0.01 versus WT mice. J, Left, Representative immunoblots probed with FABP3 antibody. Right, Quantitative analysis of Gad67 mRNA in Neuro-2a cells. n = 4 per group. **p < 0.01 versus control. mock, Mock control; OE, Fabp3 overexpression; NC, negative control; KD, Fabp3 knockdown. Error bar indicates mean ± SEM.
Techniques Used: Expressing, Western Blot, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Over Expression, Negative Control
Figure Legend Snippet: Enhancement of inhibitory synaptic plasticity in the ACC of Fabp3 KO mice. A, Representative traces of mEPSCs and mIPSCs in ACC layer II/III pyramidal neurons. B, Plots of the mEPSC and mIPSC frequencies in WT and Fabp3 KO mice. C, Plots of the mEPSC and mIPSC amplitudes in WT and Fabp3 KO mice. n = 53 cells for WT and 59 cells for Fabp3 KO from 5 mice for mEPSCs. n = 52 cells for WT and 60 cells for Fabp3 KO from 5 mice for mIPSCs. **p < 0.01 versus WT mice. Error bar indicates mean ± SEM.
Techniques Used:
Figure Legend Snippet: Extracellular glutamate (Glu) concentrations in the ACC in freely moving animals. A, Dialysate Glu concentrations at baseline (basal) and after depolarization stimulation (High-K+) (left). Glu AUC before (basal) and after (High-K+) depolarization stimulation (right). *p < 0.05 versus wild-type mice. B, Normalization of the dialysate Glu signals indicated that the response to depolarization stimulation was enhanced in Fabp3 KO mice (left). The normalized Glu AUC after depolarization stimulation (right). A, B, Error bar indicates mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05 versus WT mice. n = 6 WT mice; n = 5 Fabp3 KO mice. C, D, Representative immunoblots (left) and quantitative densitometry analysis (right) probed with various antibodies. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01 versus WT mice. n = 6 mice per group. Error bar indicates mean ± SEM.
Techniques Used: Western Blot
Figure Legend Snippet: Decreased binding of MeCP2 and HDAC1 to the Gad67 promoter region in the ACC of Fabp3 KO mice. A, Representative immunoblots (top) and quantitative densitometry analysis (bottom) probed with various antibodies are shown. n = 6 mice per group. B, ChIP assay of ACC extracts from WT or Fabp3 KO mice via anti-MeCP2 and HDAC1. The precipitated DNA was analyzed by qPCR with primers amplifying the Gad67 promoter region. **p < 0.01 versus WT mice. n = 5 WT mice. n = 4 Fabp3 KO mice. C, DNA methylation profile in the Gad67 promoter region determined by bisulfite sequencing. Black circles represent methylated CpGs. Open circles represent unmethylated sites. Top numbers indicate global percentages of methylated cytosines. D, Quantitative analysis of the Gad67 mRNA expression in the ACC. WT, n = 6; KO, n = 5; KO + MET, n = 6 mice per group. **p < 0.01 versus WT mice. ##p < 0.01 versus KO mice. E, F, Quantitative analysis of the SAM concentration by ELISA. n = 4 per group. **p < 0.01 versus mock control. MET treatment (5.2 mmol/kg, s.c., twice per day for 6 d). mock, Mock control; OE, Fabp3 overexpression. Error bar indicates mean ± SEM.
Techniques Used: Binding Assay, Western Blot, DNA Methylation Assay, Methylation Sequencing, Methylation, Expressing, Concentration Assay, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Over Expression
Figure Legend Snippet: Amelioration of behavioral abnormalities in Fabp3 KO mice by chronic treatment with MET. A, Schematic of the behavioral tests and MET treatment (5.2 mmol/kg, s.c., twice per day). During the behavioral testing period, mice received saline or MET once per day after testing. B, OFT. Graph represents the time spent in the center area over a 5 min period for WT and Fabp3 KO mice. n = 14–17 mice per group. C, HBT. An illustrative example of the travel pathway in the HBT using video tracking software (top). Graphs represent the time spent in the center area, total number of head-dips, head-dip duration, and latency to first head-dip for the 5 min testing session (bottom). n = 13–15 mice per group. **p < 0.01 versus saline-treated WT mice. ##p < 0.01 versus saline-treated KO mice. D, NORT. Differences in exploratory preference were assessed between groups in the training (left) or test (right) sessions. n = 11–15 mice per group. **p < 0.01 versus familiar group. Sal, Saline treatment. MET treatment (5.2 mmol/kg, s.c., twice per day for 6 d). Error bar indicates mean ± SEM.
Techniques Used: Software
Figure Legend Snippet: Locomotor activities during behavioral tests a
Techniques Used:
mouse monoclonal antibodies against fabp3 (Hycult Biotech)
Hycult Biotech is a verified supplier
Hycult Biotech manufactures this product
92
Structured Review
Hycult Biotech
mouse monoclonal antibodies against fabp3
Mouse Monoclonal Antibodies Against Fabp3, supplied by Hycult Biotech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse monoclonal antibodies against fabp3/product/Hycult Biotech
Average 92 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
Mouse Monoclonal Antibodies Against Fabp3, supplied by Hycult Biotech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse monoclonal antibodies against fabp3/product/Hycult Biotech
Average 92 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
mouse monoclonal antibodies against fabp3 - by Bioz Stars,
2023-09
92/100 stars
Images
mouse monoclonal antibodies against fabp3 (Hycult Biotech)
Hycult Biotech is a verified supplier
Hycult Biotech manufactures this product
86
Structured Review
Hycult Biotech
mouse monoclonal antibodies against fabp3
Mouse Monoclonal Antibodies Against Fabp3, supplied by Hycult Biotech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse monoclonal antibodies against fabp3/product/Hycult Biotech
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
Mouse Monoclonal Antibodies Against Fabp3, supplied by Hycult Biotech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse monoclonal antibodies against fabp3/product/Hycult Biotech
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
mouse monoclonal antibodies against fabp3 - by Bioz Stars,
2023-09
86/100 stars