Review





Similar Products

86
Cell Signaling Technology Inc anti phospho mlc2
Anti Phospho Mlc2, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/mlc2/pm41943423-265-50-55?v=Cell+Signaling+Technology+Inc
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti phospho mlc2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
Proteintech nti mlc2
Nti Mlc2, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/mlc2/pm41933938-251-40-42?v=Proteintech
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
nti mlc2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Cell Signaling Technology Inc anti p mlc2
Anti P Mlc2, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/mlc2/pm41832874-83-28-30?v=Cell+Signaling+Technology+Inc
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti p mlc2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Cell Signaling Technology Inc rabbit anti phospho mlc2
Rabbit Anti Phospho Mlc2, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/mlc2/bio_rxiv__64898__2026__03__17__709257-44-7-10?v=Cell+Signaling+Technology+Inc
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rabbit anti phospho mlc2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Cell Signaling Technology Inc phospho mlc2 ser19
(A) Schematic overview of ROCK1 construct transfection used to assess entosis induction. (B) Representative immunoblots showing ROCK1, phosphorylated <t>MLC2</t> (pMLC2), and tubulin (loading control) in MCF7 cells transfected with GFP, GFP–ROCK1, or constitutively active GFP–ROCK1 Δ3. Immunoblot analysis of pMLC2 was performed 6 h post-transfection, whereas ROCK1 expression was assessed at 24 h. (C) Representative 3D confocal images of live MCF7 cells expressing GFP–ROCK1 Δ3 and stained with SiR-Actin (red) and Hoechst (blue). White arrows indicate entotic structures. Boxed regions showing representative entotic structures are magnified, with corresponding orthogonal z-stack views shown alongside each image. (D) Quantification of entotic events in MCF7 cells expressing GFP–ROCK1 or GFP–ROCK1 Δ3. (E) Distribution percentages of GFP-positive cells participating in CIC structures as outer cells, inner cells, or both. (F) Representative time-lapse imaging (phase contrast, Hoechst, and GFP) capturing an entotic event in MCF7 cells expressing GFP–ROCK1 Δ3. Yellow dotted lines outline inner cells, and red dotted lines outline host cells. Experiments were performed in biological triplicate (n = 3). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. Statistical analysis in panel D was performed using a paired two-tailed Student’s t-test (**p < 0.01), whereas panel E was analyzed using two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post hoc test (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ****p < 0.0001).
Phospho Mlc2 Ser19, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/mlc2/bio_rxiv__64898__2026__03__17__709257-183-62-66?v=Cell+Signaling+Technology+Inc
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
phospho mlc2 ser19 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
Cell Signaling Technology Inc total mlc2
(A) Schematic overview of ROCK1 construct transfection used to assess entosis induction. (B) Representative immunoblots showing ROCK1, phosphorylated <t>MLC2</t> (pMLC2), and tubulin (loading control) in MCF7 cells transfected with GFP, GFP–ROCK1, or constitutively active GFP–ROCK1 Δ3. Immunoblot analysis of pMLC2 was performed 6 h post-transfection, whereas ROCK1 expression was assessed at 24 h. (C) Representative 3D confocal images of live MCF7 cells expressing GFP–ROCK1 Δ3 and stained with SiR-Actin (red) and Hoechst (blue). White arrows indicate entotic structures. Boxed regions showing representative entotic structures are magnified, with corresponding orthogonal z-stack views shown alongside each image. (D) Quantification of entotic events in MCF7 cells expressing GFP–ROCK1 or GFP–ROCK1 Δ3. (E) Distribution percentages of GFP-positive cells participating in CIC structures as outer cells, inner cells, or both. (F) Representative time-lapse imaging (phase contrast, Hoechst, and GFP) capturing an entotic event in MCF7 cells expressing GFP–ROCK1 Δ3. Yellow dotted lines outline inner cells, and red dotted lines outline host cells. Experiments were performed in biological triplicate (n = 3). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. Statistical analysis in panel D was performed using a paired two-tailed Student’s t-test (**p < 0.01), whereas panel E was analyzed using two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post hoc test (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ****p < 0.0001).
Total Mlc2, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/mlc2/bio_rxiv__64898__2026__03__13__711384-211-11-15?v=Cell+Signaling+Technology+Inc
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
total mlc2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Cell Signaling Technology Inc anti mlc2
(A) Schematic overview of ROCK1 construct transfection used to assess entosis induction. (B) Representative immunoblots showing ROCK1, phosphorylated <t>MLC2</t> (pMLC2), and tubulin (loading control) in MCF7 cells transfected with GFP, GFP–ROCK1, or constitutively active GFP–ROCK1 Δ3. Immunoblot analysis of pMLC2 was performed 6 h post-transfection, whereas ROCK1 expression was assessed at 24 h. (C) Representative 3D confocal images of live MCF7 cells expressing GFP–ROCK1 Δ3 and stained with SiR-Actin (red) and Hoechst (blue). White arrows indicate entotic structures. Boxed regions showing representative entotic structures are magnified, with corresponding orthogonal z-stack views shown alongside each image. (D) Quantification of entotic events in MCF7 cells expressing GFP–ROCK1 or GFP–ROCK1 Δ3. (E) Distribution percentages of GFP-positive cells participating in CIC structures as outer cells, inner cells, or both. (F) Representative time-lapse imaging (phase contrast, Hoechst, and GFP) capturing an entotic event in MCF7 cells expressing GFP–ROCK1 Δ3. Yellow dotted lines outline inner cells, and red dotted lines outline host cells. Experiments were performed in biological triplicate (n = 3). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. Statistical analysis in panel D was performed using a paired two-tailed Student’s t-test (**p < 0.01), whereas panel E was analyzed using two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post hoc test (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ****p < 0.0001).
Anti Mlc2, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/mlc2/pmc13047250-48-25-33?v=Cell+Signaling+Technology+Inc
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti mlc2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Signalway Antibody mlc2
(A) Schematic overview of ROCK1 construct transfection used to assess entosis induction. (B) Representative immunoblots showing ROCK1, phosphorylated <t>MLC2</t> (pMLC2), and tubulin (loading control) in MCF7 cells transfected with GFP, GFP–ROCK1, or constitutively active GFP–ROCK1 Δ3. Immunoblot analysis of pMLC2 was performed 6 h post-transfection, whereas ROCK1 expression was assessed at 24 h. (C) Representative 3D confocal images of live MCF7 cells expressing GFP–ROCK1 Δ3 and stained with SiR-Actin (red) and Hoechst (blue). White arrows indicate entotic structures. Boxed regions showing representative entotic structures are magnified, with corresponding orthogonal z-stack views shown alongside each image. (D) Quantification of entotic events in MCF7 cells expressing GFP–ROCK1 or GFP–ROCK1 Δ3. (E) Distribution percentages of GFP-positive cells participating in CIC structures as outer cells, inner cells, or both. (F) Representative time-lapse imaging (phase contrast, Hoechst, and GFP) capturing an entotic event in MCF7 cells expressing GFP–ROCK1 Δ3. Yellow dotted lines outline inner cells, and red dotted lines outline host cells. Experiments were performed in biological triplicate (n = 3). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. Statistical analysis in panel D was performed using a paired two-tailed Student’s t-test (**p < 0.01), whereas panel E was analyzed using two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post hoc test (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ****p < 0.0001).
Mlc2, supplied by Signalway Antibody, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/mlc2/pm41763331-52-15-25?v=Signalway+Antibody
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mlc2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


(A) Schematic overview of ROCK1 construct transfection used to assess entosis induction. (B) Representative immunoblots showing ROCK1, phosphorylated MLC2 (pMLC2), and tubulin (loading control) in MCF7 cells transfected with GFP, GFP–ROCK1, or constitutively active GFP–ROCK1 Δ3. Immunoblot analysis of pMLC2 was performed 6 h post-transfection, whereas ROCK1 expression was assessed at 24 h. (C) Representative 3D confocal images of live MCF7 cells expressing GFP–ROCK1 Δ3 and stained with SiR-Actin (red) and Hoechst (blue). White arrows indicate entotic structures. Boxed regions showing representative entotic structures are magnified, with corresponding orthogonal z-stack views shown alongside each image. (D) Quantification of entotic events in MCF7 cells expressing GFP–ROCK1 or GFP–ROCK1 Δ3. (E) Distribution percentages of GFP-positive cells participating in CIC structures as outer cells, inner cells, or both. (F) Representative time-lapse imaging (phase contrast, Hoechst, and GFP) capturing an entotic event in MCF7 cells expressing GFP–ROCK1 Δ3. Yellow dotted lines outline inner cells, and red dotted lines outline host cells. Experiments were performed in biological triplicate (n = 3). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. Statistical analysis in panel D was performed using a paired two-tailed Student’s t-test (**p < 0.01), whereas panel E was analyzed using two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post hoc test (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ****p < 0.0001).

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: Plastin-3 membrane recruitment drives cell-in-cell invasion during entosis

doi: 10.64898/2026.03.17.709257

Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Schematic overview of ROCK1 construct transfection used to assess entosis induction. (B) Representative immunoblots showing ROCK1, phosphorylated MLC2 (pMLC2), and tubulin (loading control) in MCF7 cells transfected with GFP, GFP–ROCK1, or constitutively active GFP–ROCK1 Δ3. Immunoblot analysis of pMLC2 was performed 6 h post-transfection, whereas ROCK1 expression was assessed at 24 h. (C) Representative 3D confocal images of live MCF7 cells expressing GFP–ROCK1 Δ3 and stained with SiR-Actin (red) and Hoechst (blue). White arrows indicate entotic structures. Boxed regions showing representative entotic structures are magnified, with corresponding orthogonal z-stack views shown alongside each image. (D) Quantification of entotic events in MCF7 cells expressing GFP–ROCK1 or GFP–ROCK1 Δ3. (E) Distribution percentages of GFP-positive cells participating in CIC structures as outer cells, inner cells, or both. (F) Representative time-lapse imaging (phase contrast, Hoechst, and GFP) capturing an entotic event in MCF7 cells expressing GFP–ROCK1 Δ3. Yellow dotted lines outline inner cells, and red dotted lines outline host cells. Experiments were performed in biological triplicate (n = 3). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. Statistical analysis in panel D was performed using a paired two-tailed Student’s t-test (**p < 0.01), whereas panel E was analyzed using two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post hoc test (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ****p < 0.0001).

Article Snippet: Membranes were blocked in 5% non-fat milk in TBS-T or in 5% BSA in TBS-T when detecting phospho-specific antibodies and incubated with primary antibodies against ROCK1 (rabbit monoclonal, 1:1000; Cell Signaling Technology, #28999S), RhoA (rabbit monoclonal, 1:1000; Cell Signaling Technology, #2117S), PLS2 (rabbit monoclonal, 1:1000; Atlas Antibodies, #HPA019493), PLS3 (mouse monoclonal, 1:1000; Invitrogen, #MA5-27772), α-tubulin (rabbit polyclonal, 1:3000; Cell Signaling Technology, #2144S), phospho-MLC2 (Ser19) (rabbit, 1:1000; Cell Signaling Technology, #3671S), and GFP (chicken polyclonal, 1:1000; Rockland Immunochemicals, #600-901-215).

Techniques: Construct, Transfection, Western Blot, Control, Expressing, Staining, Imaging, Two Tailed Test