Review





Similar Products

95
MedChemExpress non targeted dub loaded liposomes
Establishment <t>of</t> <t>DUB-loaded</t> bone-targeted liposomal delivery system. ( A ) Representative images and quantitative analysis of mineralized nodule formation via Alizarin Red S (ARS) staining in primary BMSCs for the effect of DUB@Lip on osteogenesis differentiation under conditions of 10 μM Dex. ( B ) RT-qPCR for the expression of osteogenesis-related genes in primary BMSCs of different groups. ( C-D ) In vitro cellular uptake assay of IR-780-labeled DUB@Lip liposomes in primary BMSCs by confocal microscopy and flow cytometry. ( E-F ) Evaluation of bone-targeting capacity and pharmacokinetic analysis of DUB@Lip and DUB@TLip via ex vivo fluorescence imaging. ( G-H ) Representative reconstructed images and quantification for Tb.BV/TV, Tb.N, Tb.Th, Tb.Sp, and Ct.Th in femora in mice of different groups by Micro-CT. ( I ) H&E staining and quantification for trabecular bone area in distal femora in mice of different groups. ( J ) Masson staining and quantification for collagen deposition fraction (collagen area/trabecular bone area) in distal femora in mice of different groups. n = 4 independent repeats by using different biological samples in each group for in vitro experiments, or 8 mice per group for in vivo assays. Data were means ± s.e.m. ns p > 0.05, ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001 by one-way ANOVA. Scale bars: 200 μm (A-B), 2 mm (G left & right bottom), 1 mm (G right top), and 100 μm (I-J).
Non Targeted Dub Loaded Liposomes, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/non targeted dub loaded liposomes/product/MedChemExpress
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
non targeted dub loaded liposomes - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

97
New England Biolabs rna loading dye
Establishment <t>of</t> <t>DUB-loaded</t> bone-targeted liposomal delivery system. ( A ) Representative images and quantitative analysis of mineralized nodule formation via Alizarin Red S (ARS) staining in primary BMSCs for the effect of DUB@Lip on osteogenesis differentiation under conditions of 10 μM Dex. ( B ) RT-qPCR for the expression of osteogenesis-related genes in primary BMSCs of different groups. ( C-D ) In vitro cellular uptake assay of IR-780-labeled DUB@Lip liposomes in primary BMSCs by confocal microscopy and flow cytometry. ( E-F ) Evaluation of bone-targeting capacity and pharmacokinetic analysis of DUB@Lip and DUB@TLip via ex vivo fluorescence imaging. ( G-H ) Representative reconstructed images and quantification for Tb.BV/TV, Tb.N, Tb.Th, Tb.Sp, and Ct.Th in femora in mice of different groups by Micro-CT. ( I ) H&E staining and quantification for trabecular bone area in distal femora in mice of different groups. ( J ) Masson staining and quantification for collagen deposition fraction (collagen area/trabecular bone area) in distal femora in mice of different groups. n = 4 independent repeats by using different biological samples in each group for in vitro experiments, or 8 mice per group for in vivo assays. Data were means ± s.e.m. ns p > 0.05, ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001 by one-way ANOVA. Scale bars: 200 μm (A-B), 2 mm (G left & right bottom), 1 mm (G right top), and 100 μm (I-J).
Rna Loading Dye, supplied by New England Biolabs, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/rna loading dye/product/New England Biolabs
Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rna loading dye - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
97/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
DePuy Synthes side loading depuy synthes uss ii pedicle screw system
Establishment <t>of</t> <t>DUB-loaded</t> bone-targeted liposomal delivery system. ( A ) Representative images and quantitative analysis of mineralized nodule formation via Alizarin Red S (ARS) staining in primary BMSCs for the effect of DUB@Lip on osteogenesis differentiation under conditions of 10 μM Dex. ( B ) RT-qPCR for the expression of osteogenesis-related genes in primary BMSCs of different groups. ( C-D ) In vitro cellular uptake assay of IR-780-labeled DUB@Lip liposomes in primary BMSCs by confocal microscopy and flow cytometry. ( E-F ) Evaluation of bone-targeting capacity and pharmacokinetic analysis of DUB@Lip and DUB@TLip via ex vivo fluorescence imaging. ( G-H ) Representative reconstructed images and quantification for Tb.BV/TV, Tb.N, Tb.Th, Tb.Sp, and Ct.Th in femora in mice of different groups by Micro-CT. ( I ) H&E staining and quantification for trabecular bone area in distal femora in mice of different groups. ( J ) Masson staining and quantification for collagen deposition fraction (collagen area/trabecular bone area) in distal femora in mice of different groups. n = 4 independent repeats by using different biological samples in each group for in vitro experiments, or 8 mice per group for in vivo assays. Data were means ± s.e.m. ns p > 0.05, ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001 by one-way ANOVA. Scale bars: 200 μm (A-B), 2 mm (G left & right bottom), 1 mm (G right top), and 100 μm (I-J).
Side Loading Depuy Synthes Uss Ii Pedicle Screw System, supplied by DePuy Synthes, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/side loading depuy synthes uss ii pedicle screw system/product/DePuy Synthes
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
side loading depuy synthes uss ii pedicle screw system - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Respironics standard, spring-loaded threshold device
Establishment <t>of</t> <t>DUB-loaded</t> bone-targeted liposomal delivery system. ( A ) Representative images and quantitative analysis of mineralized nodule formation via Alizarin Red S (ARS) staining in primary BMSCs for the effect of DUB@Lip on osteogenesis differentiation under conditions of 10 μM Dex. ( B ) RT-qPCR for the expression of osteogenesis-related genes in primary BMSCs of different groups. ( C-D ) In vitro cellular uptake assay of IR-780-labeled DUB@Lip liposomes in primary BMSCs by confocal microscopy and flow cytometry. ( E-F ) Evaluation of bone-targeting capacity and pharmacokinetic analysis of DUB@Lip and DUB@TLip via ex vivo fluorescence imaging. ( G-H ) Representative reconstructed images and quantification for Tb.BV/TV, Tb.N, Tb.Th, Tb.Sp, and Ct.Th in femora in mice of different groups by Micro-CT. ( I ) H&E staining and quantification for trabecular bone area in distal femora in mice of different groups. ( J ) Masson staining and quantification for collagen deposition fraction (collagen area/trabecular bone area) in distal femora in mice of different groups. n = 4 independent repeats by using different biological samples in each group for in vitro experiments, or 8 mice per group for in vivo assays. Data were means ± s.e.m. ns p > 0.05, ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001 by one-way ANOVA. Scale bars: 200 μm (A-B), 2 mm (G left & right bottom), 1 mm (G right top), and 100 μm (I-J).
Standard, Spring Loaded Threshold Device, supplied by Respironics, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/standard, spring-loaded threshold device/product/Respironics
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
standard, spring-loaded threshold device - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Interface Inc n load cell
Establishment <t>of</t> <t>DUB-loaded</t> bone-targeted liposomal delivery system. ( A ) Representative images and quantitative analysis of mineralized nodule formation via Alizarin Red S (ARS) staining in primary BMSCs for the effect of DUB@Lip on osteogenesis differentiation under conditions of 10 μM Dex. ( B ) RT-qPCR for the expression of osteogenesis-related genes in primary BMSCs of different groups. ( C-D ) In vitro cellular uptake assay of IR-780-labeled DUB@Lip liposomes in primary BMSCs by confocal microscopy and flow cytometry. ( E-F ) Evaluation of bone-targeting capacity and pharmacokinetic analysis of DUB@Lip and DUB@TLip via ex vivo fluorescence imaging. ( G-H ) Representative reconstructed images and quantification for Tb.BV/TV, Tb.N, Tb.Th, Tb.Sp, and Ct.Th in femora in mice of different groups by Micro-CT. ( I ) H&E staining and quantification for trabecular bone area in distal femora in mice of different groups. ( J ) Masson staining and quantification for collagen deposition fraction (collagen area/trabecular bone area) in distal femora in mice of different groups. n = 4 independent repeats by using different biological samples in each group for in vitro experiments, or 8 mice per group for in vivo assays. Data were means ± s.e.m. ns p > 0.05, ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001 by one-way ANOVA. Scale bars: 200 μm (A-B), 2 mm (G left & right bottom), 1 mm (G right top), and 100 μm (I-J).
N Load Cell, supplied by Interface Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/n load cell/product/Interface Inc
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
n load cell - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Epizyme Inc loading buffer
Establishment <t>of</t> <t>DUB-loaded</t> bone-targeted liposomal delivery system. ( A ) Representative images and quantitative analysis of mineralized nodule formation via Alizarin Red S (ARS) staining in primary BMSCs for the effect of DUB@Lip on osteogenesis differentiation under conditions of 10 μM Dex. ( B ) RT-qPCR for the expression of osteogenesis-related genes in primary BMSCs of different groups. ( C-D ) In vitro cellular uptake assay of IR-780-labeled DUB@Lip liposomes in primary BMSCs by confocal microscopy and flow cytometry. ( E-F ) Evaluation of bone-targeting capacity and pharmacokinetic analysis of DUB@Lip and DUB@TLip via ex vivo fluorescence imaging. ( G-H ) Representative reconstructed images and quantification for Tb.BV/TV, Tb.N, Tb.Th, Tb.Sp, and Ct.Th in femora in mice of different groups by Micro-CT. ( I ) H&E staining and quantification for trabecular bone area in distal femora in mice of different groups. ( J ) Masson staining and quantification for collagen deposition fraction (collagen area/trabecular bone area) in distal femora in mice of different groups. n = 4 independent repeats by using different biological samples in each group for in vitro experiments, or 8 mice per group for in vivo assays. Data were means ± s.e.m. ns p > 0.05, ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001 by one-way ANOVA. Scale bars: 200 μm (A-B), 2 mm (G left & right bottom), 1 mm (G right top), and 100 μm (I-J).
Loading Buffer, supplied by Epizyme Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/loading buffer/product/Epizyme Inc
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
loading buffer - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Yeasen Biotechnology sds page loading buffer
Establishment <t>of</t> <t>DUB-loaded</t> bone-targeted liposomal delivery system. ( A ) Representative images and quantitative analysis of mineralized nodule formation via Alizarin Red S (ARS) staining in primary BMSCs for the effect of DUB@Lip on osteogenesis differentiation under conditions of 10 μM Dex. ( B ) RT-qPCR for the expression of osteogenesis-related genes in primary BMSCs of different groups. ( C-D ) In vitro cellular uptake assay of IR-780-labeled DUB@Lip liposomes in primary BMSCs by confocal microscopy and flow cytometry. ( E-F ) Evaluation of bone-targeting capacity and pharmacokinetic analysis of DUB@Lip and DUB@TLip via ex vivo fluorescence imaging. ( G-H ) Representative reconstructed images and quantification for Tb.BV/TV, Tb.N, Tb.Th, Tb.Sp, and Ct.Th in femora in mice of different groups by Micro-CT. ( I ) H&E staining and quantification for trabecular bone area in distal femora in mice of different groups. ( J ) Masson staining and quantification for collagen deposition fraction (collagen area/trabecular bone area) in distal femora in mice of different groups. n = 4 independent repeats by using different biological samples in each group for in vitro experiments, or 8 mice per group for in vivo assays. Data were means ± s.e.m. ns p > 0.05, ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001 by one-way ANOVA. Scale bars: 200 μm (A-B), 2 mm (G left & right bottom), 1 mm (G right top), and 100 μm (I-J).
Sds Page Loading Buffer, supplied by Yeasen Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/sds page loading buffer/product/Yeasen Biotechnology
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
sds page loading buffer - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

99
Bio-Rad loading buffer
Establishment <t>of</t> <t>DUB-loaded</t> bone-targeted liposomal delivery system. ( A ) Representative images and quantitative analysis of mineralized nodule formation via Alizarin Red S (ARS) staining in primary BMSCs for the effect of DUB@Lip on osteogenesis differentiation under conditions of 10 μM Dex. ( B ) RT-qPCR for the expression of osteogenesis-related genes in primary BMSCs of different groups. ( C-D ) In vitro cellular uptake assay of IR-780-labeled DUB@Lip liposomes in primary BMSCs by confocal microscopy and flow cytometry. ( E-F ) Evaluation of bone-targeting capacity and pharmacokinetic analysis of DUB@Lip and DUB@TLip via ex vivo fluorescence imaging. ( G-H ) Representative reconstructed images and quantification for Tb.BV/TV, Tb.N, Tb.Th, Tb.Sp, and Ct.Th in femora in mice of different groups by Micro-CT. ( I ) H&E staining and quantification for trabecular bone area in distal femora in mice of different groups. ( J ) Masson staining and quantification for collagen deposition fraction (collagen area/trabecular bone area) in distal femora in mice of different groups. n = 4 independent repeats by using different biological samples in each group for in vitro experiments, or 8 mice per group for in vivo assays. Data were means ± s.e.m. ns p > 0.05, ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001 by one-way ANOVA. Scale bars: 200 μm (A-B), 2 mm (G left & right bottom), 1 mm (G right top), and 100 μm (I-J).
Loading Buffer, supplied by Bio-Rad, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/loading buffer/product/Bio-Rad
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
loading buffer - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Yeasen Biotechnology protein loading buffer
Establishment <t>of</t> <t>DUB-loaded</t> bone-targeted liposomal delivery system. ( A ) Representative images and quantitative analysis of mineralized nodule formation via Alizarin Red S (ARS) staining in primary BMSCs for the effect of DUB@Lip on osteogenesis differentiation under conditions of 10 μM Dex. ( B ) RT-qPCR for the expression of osteogenesis-related genes in primary BMSCs of different groups. ( C-D ) In vitro cellular uptake assay of IR-780-labeled DUB@Lip liposomes in primary BMSCs by confocal microscopy and flow cytometry. ( E-F ) Evaluation of bone-targeting capacity and pharmacokinetic analysis of DUB@Lip and DUB@TLip via ex vivo fluorescence imaging. ( G-H ) Representative reconstructed images and quantification for Tb.BV/TV, Tb.N, Tb.Th, Tb.Sp, and Ct.Th in femora in mice of different groups by Micro-CT. ( I ) H&E staining and quantification for trabecular bone area in distal femora in mice of different groups. ( J ) Masson staining and quantification for collagen deposition fraction (collagen area/trabecular bone area) in distal femora in mice of different groups. n = 4 independent repeats by using different biological samples in each group for in vitro experiments, or 8 mice per group for in vivo assays. Data were means ± s.e.m. ns p > 0.05, ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001 by one-way ANOVA. Scale bars: 200 μm (A-B), 2 mm (G left & right bottom), 1 mm (G right top), and 100 μm (I-J).
Protein Loading Buffer, supplied by Yeasen Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/protein loading buffer/product/Yeasen Biotechnology
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
protein loading buffer - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Exosome Diagnostics exosome loaded algma
The mechanism of <t>injectable</t> <t>exosome-loaded</t> hydrogel for sclera remodeling to prevent development of myopia.
Exosome Loaded Algma, supplied by Exosome Diagnostics, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/exosome loaded algma/product/Exosome Diagnostics
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
exosome loaded algma - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Establishment of DUB-loaded bone-targeted liposomal delivery system. ( A ) Representative images and quantitative analysis of mineralized nodule formation via Alizarin Red S (ARS) staining in primary BMSCs for the effect of DUB@Lip on osteogenesis differentiation under conditions of 10 μM Dex. ( B ) RT-qPCR for the expression of osteogenesis-related genes in primary BMSCs of different groups. ( C-D ) In vitro cellular uptake assay of IR-780-labeled DUB@Lip liposomes in primary BMSCs by confocal microscopy and flow cytometry. ( E-F ) Evaluation of bone-targeting capacity and pharmacokinetic analysis of DUB@Lip and DUB@TLip via ex vivo fluorescence imaging. ( G-H ) Representative reconstructed images and quantification for Tb.BV/TV, Tb.N, Tb.Th, Tb.Sp, and Ct.Th in femora in mice of different groups by Micro-CT. ( I ) H&E staining and quantification for trabecular bone area in distal femora in mice of different groups. ( J ) Masson staining and quantification for collagen deposition fraction (collagen area/trabecular bone area) in distal femora in mice of different groups. n = 4 independent repeats by using different biological samples in each group for in vitro experiments, or 8 mice per group for in vivo assays. Data were means ± s.e.m. ns p > 0.05, ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001 by one-way ANOVA. Scale bars: 200 μm (A-B), 2 mm (G left & right bottom), 1 mm (G right top), and 100 μm (I-J).

Journal: Bioactive Materials

Article Title: Screening of a quinonoid compounds library identifies decylubiquinone as an antioxidant and anti-apoptotic agent against glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis via CD39/CD73/adenosine axis

doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2026.03.062

Figure Lengend Snippet: Establishment of DUB-loaded bone-targeted liposomal delivery system. ( A ) Representative images and quantitative analysis of mineralized nodule formation via Alizarin Red S (ARS) staining in primary BMSCs for the effect of DUB@Lip on osteogenesis differentiation under conditions of 10 μM Dex. ( B ) RT-qPCR for the expression of osteogenesis-related genes in primary BMSCs of different groups. ( C-D ) In vitro cellular uptake assay of IR-780-labeled DUB@Lip liposomes in primary BMSCs by confocal microscopy and flow cytometry. ( E-F ) Evaluation of bone-targeting capacity and pharmacokinetic analysis of DUB@Lip and DUB@TLip via ex vivo fluorescence imaging. ( G-H ) Representative reconstructed images and quantification for Tb.BV/TV, Tb.N, Tb.Th, Tb.Sp, and Ct.Th in femora in mice of different groups by Micro-CT. ( I ) H&E staining and quantification for trabecular bone area in distal femora in mice of different groups. ( J ) Masson staining and quantification for collagen deposition fraction (collagen area/trabecular bone area) in distal femora in mice of different groups. n = 4 independent repeats by using different biological samples in each group for in vitro experiments, or 8 mice per group for in vivo assays. Data were means ± s.e.m. ns p > 0.05, ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001 by one-way ANOVA. Scale bars: 200 μm (A-B), 2 mm (G left & right bottom), 1 mm (G right top), and 100 μm (I-J).

Article Snippet: To prepare non-targeted DUB-loaded liposomes, DSPE-PEG2000-ALN was substituted with an equimolar amount of DSPE-mPEG2000 (HY-142978, MedChemExpress, Shanghai, China) using the same preparation procedure.

Techniques: Staining, Quantitative RT-PCR, Expressing, In Vitro, Labeling, Liposomes, Confocal Microscopy, Flow Cytometry, Ex Vivo, Fluorescence, Imaging, Micro-CT, In Vivo

The mechanism of injectable exosome-loaded hydrogel for sclera remodeling to prevent development of myopia.

Journal: Materials Today Bio

Article Title: The mechanistic study of injectable hydrogel loaded with BMSC-exosomes in regulating the TGF-β/MMP axis to inhibit experimental myopia model

doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2026.103051

Figure Lengend Snippet: The mechanism of injectable exosome-loaded hydrogel for sclera remodeling to prevent development of myopia.

Article Snippet: Exosome-loaded AlgMA-MGs (Exos-AlgMA-MGs) enhanced fibroblast proliferation and migration, downregulated MMP-2, and upregulated collagen I synthesis via modulation of the TGF-β/MMP axis.

Techniques:

Characterization of injectability and biosafety of AlgMA-MGs. (A) Schematic of the injection process of AlgMA-MGs. (B) Microscopic photograph of AlgMA-MGs. Scale bar: 300 μm. (C) Temperature sweep of G′ and G″ for AlgMA and AlgMA-MGs from 20 °C to 50 °C. (D) Frequency dependence of G′ and G″ between 1 and 50 Hz. (E) Strain amplitude sweep from 0.1% to 100% strain. (F) Viscosity as a function of shear rate (0.1–1000 s −1 ). (G, H) Evolution of G′, G″, and viscosity during the oscillatory strain sweep (1%-10%-1%-50%-1%-100%-1%). (I) Subcutaneous implantation of AlgMA-MGs hydrogel within 4 weeks in vivo. (J) H&E-stained tissue section of the implantation site and normal tissue at week 4. Scale bars: 200 μm.

Journal: Materials Today Bio

Article Title: The mechanistic study of injectable hydrogel loaded with BMSC-exosomes in regulating the TGF-β/MMP axis to inhibit experimental myopia model

doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2026.103051

Figure Lengend Snippet: Characterization of injectability and biosafety of AlgMA-MGs. (A) Schematic of the injection process of AlgMA-MGs. (B) Microscopic photograph of AlgMA-MGs. Scale bar: 300 μm. (C) Temperature sweep of G′ and G″ for AlgMA and AlgMA-MGs from 20 °C to 50 °C. (D) Frequency dependence of G′ and G″ between 1 and 50 Hz. (E) Strain amplitude sweep from 0.1% to 100% strain. (F) Viscosity as a function of shear rate (0.1–1000 s −1 ). (G, H) Evolution of G′, G″, and viscosity during the oscillatory strain sweep (1%-10%-1%-50%-1%-100%-1%). (I) Subcutaneous implantation of AlgMA-MGs hydrogel within 4 weeks in vivo. (J) H&E-stained tissue section of the implantation site and normal tissue at week 4. Scale bars: 200 μm.

Article Snippet: Exosome-loaded AlgMA-MGs (Exos-AlgMA-MGs) enhanced fibroblast proliferation and migration, downregulated MMP-2, and upregulated collagen I synthesis via modulation of the TGF-β/MMP axis.

Techniques: Injection, Viscosity, Shear, In Vivo, Staining

Hydrogel implantation procedure and longitudinal ocular parameters of the different treatment groups. (A) Sub-Tenon's implantation of the injectable exosome-loaded hydrogel at the posterior pole. (B) Temporal changes in intraocular pressure across the different treatment groups. (C) Temporal changes in axial length across the different treatment groups. (D) Axial length at each time point for the different treatment groups. (E) Axial length of each treatment group at different time points. (n ≥ 3; ns: no significance, ∗: p < 0.05, ∗∗: p < 0.01, ∗∗∗: p < 0.001).

Journal: Materials Today Bio

Article Title: The mechanistic study of injectable hydrogel loaded with BMSC-exosomes in regulating the TGF-β/MMP axis to inhibit experimental myopia model

doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2026.103051

Figure Lengend Snippet: Hydrogel implantation procedure and longitudinal ocular parameters of the different treatment groups. (A) Sub-Tenon's implantation of the injectable exosome-loaded hydrogel at the posterior pole. (B) Temporal changes in intraocular pressure across the different treatment groups. (C) Temporal changes in axial length across the different treatment groups. (D) Axial length at each time point for the different treatment groups. (E) Axial length of each treatment group at different time points. (n ≥ 3; ns: no significance, ∗: p < 0.05, ∗∗: p < 0.01, ∗∗∗: p < 0.001).

Article Snippet: Exosome-loaded AlgMA-MGs (Exos-AlgMA-MGs) enhanced fibroblast proliferation and migration, downregulated MMP-2, and upregulated collagen I synthesis via modulation of the TGF-β/MMP axis.

Techniques: