Review



4 parameter cabinet x ray system  (KUB Technologies Inc)


Bioz Verified Symbol KUB Technologies Inc is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol KUB Technologies Inc manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 94

    Structured Review

    KUB Technologies Inc 4 parameter cabinet x ray system
    4 Parameter Cabinet X Ray System, supplied by KUB Technologies Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 35 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/4 parameter cabinet x ray system/product/KUB Technologies Inc
    Average 94 stars, based on 35 article reviews
    4 parameter cabinet x ray system - by Bioz Stars, 2025-12
    94/100 stars

    Images



    Similar Products

    94
    KUB Technologies Inc 4 parameter cabinet x ray system
    4 Parameter Cabinet X Ray System, supplied by KUB Technologies Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/4 parameter cabinet x ray system/product/KUB Technologies Inc
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    4 parameter cabinet x ray system - by Bioz Stars, 2025-12
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    KUB Technologies Inc xpert 40 k071233 kubtec
    Xpert 40 K071233 Kubtec, supplied by KUB Technologies Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/xpert 40 k071233 kubtec/product/KUB Technologies Inc
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    xpert 40 k071233 kubtec - by Bioz Stars, 2025-12
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    KUB Technologies Inc kubtec xpert 40
    Kubtec Xpert 40, supplied by KUB Technologies Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/kubtec xpert 40/product/KUB Technologies Inc
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    kubtec xpert 40 - by Bioz Stars, 2025-12
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    KUB Technologies Inc kubtec xpert 40 indications
    Kubtec Xpert 40 Indications, supplied by KUB Technologies Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/kubtec xpert 40 indications/product/KUB Technologies Inc
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    kubtec xpert 40 indications - by Bioz Stars, 2025-12
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    KUB Technologies Inc xpert 40 regulation number
    Xpert 40 Regulation Number, supplied by KUB Technologies Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/xpert 40 regulation number/product/KUB Technologies Inc
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    xpert 40 regulation number - by Bioz Stars, 2025-12
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    KUB Technologies Inc medical imaging xpert 40 specimen radiography system
    Medical Imaging Xpert 40 Specimen Radiography System, supplied by KUB Technologies Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/medical imaging xpert 40 specimen radiography system/product/KUB Technologies Inc
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    medical imaging xpert 40 specimen radiography system - by Bioz Stars, 2025-12
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    KUB Technologies Inc animal x ray machine
    Animal X Ray Machine, supplied by KUB Technologies Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/animal x ray machine/product/KUB Technologies Inc
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    animal x ray machine - by Bioz Stars, 2025-12
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    KUB Technologies Inc dual energy x ray absorptiometry dexa analyser
    Improvement of bone health and body composition parameters in MyoAAV–C3/384‐treated homozygous DMSXL mice. A group of DMSXL male and female homozygous mice at age P5 received a systemic injection of MyoAAV vectors carrying Cas9 and sgC3/384 pair ( n = 7), and underwent whole‐body <t>DEXA</t> analysis at 16 weeks of age. Control animals were wild‐types (WT, n = 16) and untreated DMSXL homozygous mice (NT, n = 14) of both sexes. All data are represented as mean ± SEM and individual data points; data from male (open symbols) and female (filled symbols) mice are pooled. (A–C) Bone health parameters: bone mineral density (BMD) (A), bone mineral content (BMC) (B) and bone area (C). (A) BMD: MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 2.595, df = 14, * p = .02. (B) BMC: MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 3.371, df = 15, ** p = .004. (C) Bone area, WT vs. NT, Mann–Whitney test, U = 53, * p = .013; MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 4.25, df = 16, *** p = .0006. (D–F) Body composition parameters: fat tissue percentage (D), lean tissue percentage (E) and fat/lean mass ratio (adiposity index, F). (D) Fat tissue %: WT vs. NT, Mann–Whitney test, U = 46, ** p = .0052; MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 2.684, df = 17.14, * p = .015. (E) Lean tissue %: WT vs. NT, Mann–Whitney test, U = 45, ** p = .0045; MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 2.684, df = 17.14, * p = .015. (F) Adiposity index, WT vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 3.265, df = 15.37, ** p = .0051; MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 2.643, df = 16.41, * p = .017.
    Dual Energy X Ray Absorptiometry Dexa Analyser, supplied by KUB Technologies Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/dual energy x ray absorptiometry dexa analyser/product/KUB Technologies Inc
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    dual energy x ray absorptiometry dexa analyser - by Bioz Stars, 2025-12
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    KUB Technologies Inc parameter 2d cabinet x ray system
    Improvement of bone health and body composition parameters in MyoAAV–C3/384‐treated homozygous DMSXL mice. A group of DMSXL male and female homozygous mice at age P5 received a systemic injection of MyoAAV vectors carrying Cas9 and sgC3/384 pair ( n = 7), and underwent whole‐body <t>DEXA</t> analysis at 16 weeks of age. Control animals were wild‐types (WT, n = 16) and untreated DMSXL homozygous mice (NT, n = 14) of both sexes. All data are represented as mean ± SEM and individual data points; data from male (open symbols) and female (filled symbols) mice are pooled. (A–C) Bone health parameters: bone mineral density (BMD) (A), bone mineral content (BMC) (B) and bone area (C). (A) BMD: MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 2.595, df = 14, * p = .02. (B) BMC: MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 3.371, df = 15, ** p = .004. (C) Bone area, WT vs. NT, Mann–Whitney test, U = 53, * p = .013; MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 4.25, df = 16, *** p = .0006. (D–F) Body composition parameters: fat tissue percentage (D), lean tissue percentage (E) and fat/lean mass ratio (adiposity index, F). (D) Fat tissue %: WT vs. NT, Mann–Whitney test, U = 46, ** p = .0052; MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 2.684, df = 17.14, * p = .015. (E) Lean tissue %: WT vs. NT, Mann–Whitney test, U = 45, ** p = .0045; MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 2.684, df = 17.14, * p = .015. (F) Adiposity index, WT vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 3.265, df = 15.37, ** p = .0051; MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 2.643, df = 16.41, * p = .017.
    Parameter 2d Cabinet X Ray System, supplied by KUB Technologies Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/parameter 2d cabinet x ray system/product/KUB Technologies Inc
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    parameter 2d cabinet x ray system - by Bioz Stars, 2025-12
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Improvement of bone health and body composition parameters in MyoAAV–C3/384‐treated homozygous DMSXL mice. A group of DMSXL male and female homozygous mice at age P5 received a systemic injection of MyoAAV vectors carrying Cas9 and sgC3/384 pair ( n = 7), and underwent whole‐body DEXA analysis at 16 weeks of age. Control animals were wild‐types (WT, n = 16) and untreated DMSXL homozygous mice (NT, n = 14) of both sexes. All data are represented as mean ± SEM and individual data points; data from male (open symbols) and female (filled symbols) mice are pooled. (A–C) Bone health parameters: bone mineral density (BMD) (A), bone mineral content (BMC) (B) and bone area (C). (A) BMD: MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 2.595, df = 14, * p = .02. (B) BMC: MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 3.371, df = 15, ** p = .004. (C) Bone area, WT vs. NT, Mann–Whitney test, U = 53, * p = .013; MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 4.25, df = 16, *** p = .0006. (D–F) Body composition parameters: fat tissue percentage (D), lean tissue percentage (E) and fat/lean mass ratio (adiposity index, F). (D) Fat tissue %: WT vs. NT, Mann–Whitney test, U = 46, ** p = .0052; MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 2.684, df = 17.14, * p = .015. (E) Lean tissue %: WT vs. NT, Mann–Whitney test, U = 45, ** p = .0045; MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 2.684, df = 17.14, * p = .015. (F) Adiposity index, WT vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 3.265, df = 15.37, ** p = .0051; MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 2.643, df = 16.41, * p = .017.

    Journal: Clinical and Translational Medicine

    Article Title: Muscle‐specific gene editing improves molecular and phenotypic defects in a mouse model of myotonic dystrophy type 1

    doi: 10.1002/ctm2.70227

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Improvement of bone health and body composition parameters in MyoAAV–C3/384‐treated homozygous DMSXL mice. A group of DMSXL male and female homozygous mice at age P5 received a systemic injection of MyoAAV vectors carrying Cas9 and sgC3/384 pair ( n = 7), and underwent whole‐body DEXA analysis at 16 weeks of age. Control animals were wild‐types (WT, n = 16) and untreated DMSXL homozygous mice (NT, n = 14) of both sexes. All data are represented as mean ± SEM and individual data points; data from male (open symbols) and female (filled symbols) mice are pooled. (A–C) Bone health parameters: bone mineral density (BMD) (A), bone mineral content (BMC) (B) and bone area (C). (A) BMD: MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 2.595, df = 14, * p = .02. (B) BMC: MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 3.371, df = 15, ** p = .004. (C) Bone area, WT vs. NT, Mann–Whitney test, U = 53, * p = .013; MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 4.25, df = 16, *** p = .0006. (D–F) Body composition parameters: fat tissue percentage (D), lean tissue percentage (E) and fat/lean mass ratio (adiposity index, F). (D) Fat tissue %: WT vs. NT, Mann–Whitney test, U = 46, ** p = .0052; MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 2.684, df = 17.14, * p = .015. (E) Lean tissue %: WT vs. NT, Mann–Whitney test, U = 45, ** p = .0045; MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 2.684, df = 17.14, * p = .015. (F) Adiposity index, WT vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 3.265, df = 15.37, ** p = .0051; MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 2.643, df = 16.41, * p = .017.

    Article Snippet: Bone health and body composition were comprehensively evaluated at the age of 4 months using Dual Energy X‐ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) analyser (The PARAMETER™ XPERT® 40 Cabinet X‐ray System, T00261_A 9.2019; Kubtec Scientific, 111 Research Drive Stratford, CT 06615, USA).

    Techniques: Injection, Control, MANN-WHITNEY