ind1 l uncultured acidovorax sp  (ATCC)


Bioz Verified Symbol ATCC is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol ATCC manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 86

    Structured Review

    ATCC ind1 l uncultured acidovorax sp
    The evolutionary relation between strains was inferred using the Bayesian phylogenetic tree. 1,000,000 generations for BI (Bayesian inferences) using the GTR+ G model was done. Branches corresponding to partitions reproduced in less than 50 % bootstrap replicates are collapsed. Node bars and branch length were given, arrow represents selected nodes for bootstrap support value estimation. Pseudomonas sp. <t>IND1</t> (S1), Pseudomonas sp. IND2 (S2), Pseudomonas sp. IND3 (S3), Pseudomonas sp. IND4 (S4), Uncultured Acidovorax sp. clone (S5), Uncultured Comamonas sp. (S6), Frankia sp. G2 (S7), Frankia sp. (S8), Frankia sp. FE12 (S9), Uncultured bacterial sp. (S10), Pseudomonas sp. AMD3 (S11), Pseudomonas stutzeri strain (S12), Uncultured Pseudomonas sp. (S13), Pseudomonas stutzeri ATCC (S14), Frankia sp. BMG5.11 (S15), Frankia sp. Hsli 2 (S16), Frankia sp. Hsli 8 (S17), Frankia sp. Hsli 9 (S18), Frankia sp. Hsli 10 (S19)
    Ind1 L Uncultured Acidovorax Sp, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/ind1 l uncultured acidovorax sp/product/ATCC
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
    ind1 l uncultured acidovorax sp - by Bioz Stars, 2024-07
    86/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Deciphering the evolutionary affiliations among bacterial strains ( Pseudomonas and Frankia sp.) inhabiting same ecological niche using virtual RFLP and simulation-based approaches"

    Article Title: Deciphering the evolutionary affiliations among bacterial strains ( Pseudomonas and Frankia sp.) inhabiting same ecological niche using virtual RFLP and simulation-based approaches

    Journal: 3 Biotech

    doi: 10.1007/s13205-016-0488-5

    The evolutionary relation between strains was inferred using the Bayesian phylogenetic tree. 1,000,000 generations for BI (Bayesian inferences) using the GTR+ G model was done. Branches corresponding to partitions reproduced in less than 50 % bootstrap replicates are collapsed. Node bars and branch length were given, arrow represents selected nodes for bootstrap support value estimation. Pseudomonas sp. IND1 (S1), Pseudomonas sp. IND2 (S2), Pseudomonas sp. IND3 (S3), Pseudomonas sp. IND4 (S4), Uncultured Acidovorax sp. clone (S5), Uncultured Comamonas sp. (S6), Frankia sp. G2 (S7), Frankia sp. (S8), Frankia sp. FE12 (S9), Uncultured bacterial sp. (S10), Pseudomonas sp. AMD3 (S11), Pseudomonas stutzeri strain (S12), Uncultured Pseudomonas sp. (S13), Pseudomonas stutzeri ATCC (S14), Frankia sp. BMG5.11 (S15), Frankia sp. Hsli 2 (S16), Frankia sp. Hsli 8 (S17), Frankia sp. Hsli 9 (S18), Frankia sp. Hsli 10 (S19)
    Figure Legend Snippet: The evolutionary relation between strains was inferred using the Bayesian phylogenetic tree. 1,000,000 generations for BI (Bayesian inferences) using the GTR+ G model was done. Branches corresponding to partitions reproduced in less than 50 % bootstrap replicates are collapsed. Node bars and branch length were given, arrow represents selected nodes for bootstrap support value estimation. Pseudomonas sp. IND1 (S1), Pseudomonas sp. IND2 (S2), Pseudomonas sp. IND3 (S3), Pseudomonas sp. IND4 (S4), Uncultured Acidovorax sp. clone (S5), Uncultured Comamonas sp. (S6), Frankia sp. G2 (S7), Frankia sp. (S8), Frankia sp. FE12 (S9), Uncultured bacterial sp. (S10), Pseudomonas sp. AMD3 (S11), Pseudomonas stutzeri strain (S12), Uncultured Pseudomonas sp. (S13), Pseudomonas stutzeri ATCC (S14), Frankia sp. BMG5.11 (S15), Frankia sp. Hsli 2 (S16), Frankia sp. Hsli 8 (S17), Frankia sp. Hsli 9 (S18), Frankia sp. Hsli 10 (S19)

    Techniques Used:

    PCA analysis of RFLP patterns: uncultured Pseudomonas sp. (j) Frankia sp. FE12 (c) Uncultured bacterial sp. (g) Pseudomonas sp. IND3 (n) Pseudomonas sp. IND1 (l) uncultured Acidovorax sp. clone (e) Pseudomonas stutzeri strain TH-31 (i) Pseudomonas sp. IND2 (m) Pseudomonas stutzeri ATCC 17588 (k) Pseudomonas sp. AMD3 (h) Pseudomonas sp. IND4 (o) Frankia sp. G2 (a) Uncultured Comamonas sp. (f) Frankia sp. (b) Frankia sp. BMG5.11 (d) Frankia sp. Hsli 2 (p) Frankia sp. Hsli 8 (q) Frankia sp. Hsli 9 (r) Frankia sp. Hsli 10 (s)
    Figure Legend Snippet: PCA analysis of RFLP patterns: uncultured Pseudomonas sp. (j) Frankia sp. FE12 (c) Uncultured bacterial sp. (g) Pseudomonas sp. IND3 (n) Pseudomonas sp. IND1 (l) uncultured Acidovorax sp. clone (e) Pseudomonas stutzeri strain TH-31 (i) Pseudomonas sp. IND2 (m) Pseudomonas stutzeri ATCC 17588 (k) Pseudomonas sp. AMD3 (h) Pseudomonas sp. IND4 (o) Frankia sp. G2 (a) Uncultured Comamonas sp. (f) Frankia sp. (b) Frankia sp. BMG5.11 (d) Frankia sp. Hsli 2 (p) Frankia sp. Hsli 8 (q) Frankia sp. Hsli 9 (r) Frankia sp. Hsli 10 (s)

    Techniques Used:

    Similar Products

  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 86
    ATCC ind1 l uncultured acidovorax sp
    The evolutionary relation between strains was inferred using the Bayesian phylogenetic tree. 1,000,000 generations for BI (Bayesian inferences) using the GTR+ G model was done. Branches corresponding to partitions reproduced in less than 50 % bootstrap replicates are collapsed. Node bars and branch length were given, arrow represents selected nodes for bootstrap support value estimation. Pseudomonas sp. <t>IND1</t> (S1), Pseudomonas sp. IND2 (S2), Pseudomonas sp. IND3 (S3), Pseudomonas sp. IND4 (S4), Uncultured Acidovorax sp. clone (S5), Uncultured Comamonas sp. (S6), Frankia sp. G2 (S7), Frankia sp. (S8), Frankia sp. FE12 (S9), Uncultured bacterial sp. (S10), Pseudomonas sp. AMD3 (S11), Pseudomonas stutzeri strain (S12), Uncultured Pseudomonas sp. (S13), Pseudomonas stutzeri ATCC (S14), Frankia sp. BMG5.11 (S15), Frankia sp. Hsli 2 (S16), Frankia sp. Hsli 8 (S17), Frankia sp. Hsli 9 (S18), Frankia sp. Hsli 10 (S19)
    Ind1 L Uncultured Acidovorax Sp, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/ind1 l uncultured acidovorax sp/product/ATCC
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
    ind1 l uncultured acidovorax sp - by Bioz Stars, 2024-07
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    The evolutionary relation between strains was inferred using the Bayesian phylogenetic tree. 1,000,000 generations for BI (Bayesian inferences) using the GTR+ G model was done. Branches corresponding to partitions reproduced in less than 50 % bootstrap replicates are collapsed. Node bars and branch length were given, arrow represents selected nodes for bootstrap support value estimation. Pseudomonas sp. IND1 (S1), Pseudomonas sp. IND2 (S2), Pseudomonas sp. IND3 (S3), Pseudomonas sp. IND4 (S4), Uncultured Acidovorax sp. clone (S5), Uncultured Comamonas sp. (S6), Frankia sp. G2 (S7), Frankia sp. (S8), Frankia sp. FE12 (S9), Uncultured bacterial sp. (S10), Pseudomonas sp. AMD3 (S11), Pseudomonas stutzeri strain (S12), Uncultured Pseudomonas sp. (S13), Pseudomonas stutzeri ATCC (S14), Frankia sp. BMG5.11 (S15), Frankia sp. Hsli 2 (S16), Frankia sp. Hsli 8 (S17), Frankia sp. Hsli 9 (S18), Frankia sp. Hsli 10 (S19)

    Journal: 3 Biotech

    Article Title: Deciphering the evolutionary affiliations among bacterial strains ( Pseudomonas and Frankia sp.) inhabiting same ecological niche using virtual RFLP and simulation-based approaches

    doi: 10.1007/s13205-016-0488-5

    Figure Lengend Snippet: The evolutionary relation between strains was inferred using the Bayesian phylogenetic tree. 1,000,000 generations for BI (Bayesian inferences) using the GTR+ G model was done. Branches corresponding to partitions reproduced in less than 50 % bootstrap replicates are collapsed. Node bars and branch length were given, arrow represents selected nodes for bootstrap support value estimation. Pseudomonas sp. IND1 (S1), Pseudomonas sp. IND2 (S2), Pseudomonas sp. IND3 (S3), Pseudomonas sp. IND4 (S4), Uncultured Acidovorax sp. clone (S5), Uncultured Comamonas sp. (S6), Frankia sp. G2 (S7), Frankia sp. (S8), Frankia sp. FE12 (S9), Uncultured bacterial sp. (S10), Pseudomonas sp. AMD3 (S11), Pseudomonas stutzeri strain (S12), Uncultured Pseudomonas sp. (S13), Pseudomonas stutzeri ATCC (S14), Frankia sp. BMG5.11 (S15), Frankia sp. Hsli 2 (S16), Frankia sp. Hsli 8 (S17), Frankia sp. Hsli 9 (S18), Frankia sp. Hsli 10 (S19)

    Article Snippet: Fig. 4 PCA analysis of RFLP patterns: uncultured Pseudomonas sp. (j) Frankia sp. FE12 (c) Uncultured bacterial sp. (g) Pseudomonas sp. IND3 (n) Pseudomonas sp. IND1 (l) uncultured Acidovorax sp. clone (e) Pseudomonas stutzeri strain TH-31 (i) Pseudomonas sp. IND2 (m) Pseudomonas stutzeri ATCC 17588 (k) Pseudomonas sp. AMD3 (h) Pseudomonas sp. IND4 (o) Frankia sp. G2 (a) Uncultured Comamonas sp. (f) Frankia sp. (b) Frankia sp. BMG5.11 (d) Frankia sp. Hsli 2 (p) Frankia sp. Hsli 8 (q) Frankia sp. Hsli 9 (r) Frankia sp. Hsli 10 (s)

    Techniques:

    PCA analysis of RFLP patterns: uncultured Pseudomonas sp. (j) Frankia sp. FE12 (c) Uncultured bacterial sp. (g) Pseudomonas sp. IND3 (n) Pseudomonas sp. IND1 (l) uncultured Acidovorax sp. clone (e) Pseudomonas stutzeri strain TH-31 (i) Pseudomonas sp. IND2 (m) Pseudomonas stutzeri ATCC 17588 (k) Pseudomonas sp. AMD3 (h) Pseudomonas sp. IND4 (o) Frankia sp. G2 (a) Uncultured Comamonas sp. (f) Frankia sp. (b) Frankia sp. BMG5.11 (d) Frankia sp. Hsli 2 (p) Frankia sp. Hsli 8 (q) Frankia sp. Hsli 9 (r) Frankia sp. Hsli 10 (s)

    Journal: 3 Biotech

    Article Title: Deciphering the evolutionary affiliations among bacterial strains ( Pseudomonas and Frankia sp.) inhabiting same ecological niche using virtual RFLP and simulation-based approaches

    doi: 10.1007/s13205-016-0488-5

    Figure Lengend Snippet: PCA analysis of RFLP patterns: uncultured Pseudomonas sp. (j) Frankia sp. FE12 (c) Uncultured bacterial sp. (g) Pseudomonas sp. IND3 (n) Pseudomonas sp. IND1 (l) uncultured Acidovorax sp. clone (e) Pseudomonas stutzeri strain TH-31 (i) Pseudomonas sp. IND2 (m) Pseudomonas stutzeri ATCC 17588 (k) Pseudomonas sp. AMD3 (h) Pseudomonas sp. IND4 (o) Frankia sp. G2 (a) Uncultured Comamonas sp. (f) Frankia sp. (b) Frankia sp. BMG5.11 (d) Frankia sp. Hsli 2 (p) Frankia sp. Hsli 8 (q) Frankia sp. Hsli 9 (r) Frankia sp. Hsli 10 (s)

    Article Snippet: Fig. 4 PCA analysis of RFLP patterns: uncultured Pseudomonas sp. (j) Frankia sp. FE12 (c) Uncultured bacterial sp. (g) Pseudomonas sp. IND3 (n) Pseudomonas sp. IND1 (l) uncultured Acidovorax sp. clone (e) Pseudomonas stutzeri strain TH-31 (i) Pseudomonas sp. IND2 (m) Pseudomonas stutzeri ATCC 17588 (k) Pseudomonas sp. AMD3 (h) Pseudomonas sp. IND4 (o) Frankia sp. G2 (a) Uncultured Comamonas sp. (f) Frankia sp. (b) Frankia sp. BMG5.11 (d) Frankia sp. Hsli 2 (p) Frankia sp. Hsli 8 (q) Frankia sp. Hsli 9 (r) Frankia sp. Hsli 10 (s)

    Techniques: