Review





Similar Products

94
Sino Biological human il15rα
Human Il15rα, supplied by Sino Biological, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/human il15rα/product/Sino Biological
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
human il15rα - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
MedChemExpress il15 il15rα complex
Il15 Il15rα Complex, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/il15 il15rα complex/product/MedChemExpress
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
il15 il15rα complex - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Jackson Laboratory il15rα knockout mice
Il15rα Knockout Mice, supplied by Jackson Laboratory, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/il15rα knockout mice/product/Jackson Laboratory
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
il15rα knockout mice - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Thermo Fisher anti-il15rα pa5-79467
Anti Il15rα Pa5 79467, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/anti-il15rα pa5-79467/product/Thermo Fisher
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti-il15rα pa5-79467 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
R&D Systems Hematology il15rα
Preparation and characterization of DoxFILN and their interaction with 4T1 or CTLL‐2 cells. a) Representative schemes and transmission electron microscope (TEM) images of I‐pBMDCN, Dox‐Fn, and DoxFILN in different pH. The samples were stained with 2% phosphotungstic acid. b) Size distribution of DoxFILN and Dox‐Fn in buffers of pH 6.5 or pH 7.4. All data were determined by a Zetasizer. c) The Dox release profiles of Dox‐Fn, DoxFILN −M70 , and DoxFILN in buffers of pH 5.0, pH 6.4, or pH 7.4. All data were presented as mean ± s.d. ( n = 3 samples per group). d) SDS‐PAGE protein analysis (top) and Western blot analysis of <t>IL15Rα</t> protein (bottom) in I‐pBMDCN, I‐pBMDC membrane, and DoxFILN. e) Profiles of the concentration of IL15c on DoxFILN in 72 h in pH 6.5 or pH 7.4. f) Flow cytometry determination of the cellular uptake of FITC‐labelled Fn and Cy5‐labelled membrane protein by 4T1 cells or CTLL‐2 cells after 4 h incubation with FILN −M70 or FILN in buffers of pH 6.5 (IL15c at 10 ng mL −1 equivalent). Data were presented as mean ± s.d. ( n = 3 biological replicates per group) and statistically analyzed using the Student's t ‐test. g) Representative confocal images showing intracellular localization of FITC‐labelled Fn and Cy5‐labelled membrane protein. The cells were stained with Hoechst 33 342 (blue). The scale bars represent a distance of 20 µm. h) Cell viability of 4T1 or CTLL‐2 after being treated by DoxFILN −M70 or DoxFILN in pH 6.5. Data were presented as mean ± s.d. ( n = 3 biological replicates per group) and statistically analyzed using the Student's t ‐test. i) Mechanism of cell‐specific drug delivery by DoxFILN.
Il15rα, supplied by R&D Systems Hematology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/il15rα/product/R&D Systems Hematology
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
il15rα - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Ocean NanoTech il15rα-fc
Preparation and characterization of DoxFILN and their interaction with 4T1 or CTLL‐2 cells. a) Representative schemes and transmission electron microscope (TEM) images of I‐pBMDCN, Dox‐Fn, and DoxFILN in different pH. The samples were stained with 2% phosphotungstic acid. b) Size distribution of DoxFILN and Dox‐Fn in buffers of pH 6.5 or pH 7.4. All data were determined by a Zetasizer. c) The Dox release profiles of Dox‐Fn, DoxFILN −M70 , and DoxFILN in buffers of pH 5.0, pH 6.4, or pH 7.4. All data were presented as mean ± s.d. ( n = 3 samples per group). d) SDS‐PAGE protein analysis (top) and Western blot analysis of <t>IL15Rα</t> protein (bottom) in I‐pBMDCN, I‐pBMDC membrane, and DoxFILN. e) Profiles of the concentration of IL15c on DoxFILN in 72 h in pH 6.5 or pH 7.4. f) Flow cytometry determination of the cellular uptake of FITC‐labelled Fn and Cy5‐labelled membrane protein by 4T1 cells or CTLL‐2 cells after 4 h incubation with FILN −M70 or FILN in buffers of pH 6.5 (IL15c at 10 ng mL −1 equivalent). Data were presented as mean ± s.d. ( n = 3 biological replicates per group) and statistically analyzed using the Student's t ‐test. g) Representative confocal images showing intracellular localization of FITC‐labelled Fn and Cy5‐labelled membrane protein. The cells were stained with Hoechst 33 342 (blue). The scale bars represent a distance of 20 µm. h) Cell viability of 4T1 or CTLL‐2 after being treated by DoxFILN −M70 or DoxFILN in pH 6.5. Data were presented as mean ± s.d. ( n = 3 biological replicates per group) and statistically analyzed using the Student's t ‐test. i) Mechanism of cell‐specific drug delivery by DoxFILN.
Il15rα Fc, supplied by Ocean NanoTech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/il15rα-fc/product/Ocean NanoTech
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
il15rα-fc - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Thermo Fisher pe-conjugated anti-il15rα
Preparation and characterization of DoxFILN and their interaction with 4T1 or CTLL‐2 cells. a) Representative schemes and transmission electron microscope (TEM) images of I‐pBMDCN, Dox‐Fn, and DoxFILN in different pH. The samples were stained with 2% phosphotungstic acid. b) Size distribution of DoxFILN and Dox‐Fn in buffers of pH 6.5 or pH 7.4. All data were determined by a Zetasizer. c) The Dox release profiles of Dox‐Fn, DoxFILN −M70 , and DoxFILN in buffers of pH 5.0, pH 6.4, or pH 7.4. All data were presented as mean ± s.d. ( n = 3 samples per group). d) SDS‐PAGE protein analysis (top) and Western blot analysis of <t>IL15Rα</t> protein (bottom) in I‐pBMDCN, I‐pBMDC membrane, and DoxFILN. e) Profiles of the concentration of IL15c on DoxFILN in 72 h in pH 6.5 or pH 7.4. f) Flow cytometry determination of the cellular uptake of FITC‐labelled Fn and Cy5‐labelled membrane protein by 4T1 cells or CTLL‐2 cells after 4 h incubation with FILN −M70 or FILN in buffers of pH 6.5 (IL15c at 10 ng mL −1 equivalent). Data were presented as mean ± s.d. ( n = 3 biological replicates per group) and statistically analyzed using the Student's t ‐test. g) Representative confocal images showing intracellular localization of FITC‐labelled Fn and Cy5‐labelled membrane protein. The cells were stained with Hoechst 33 342 (blue). The scale bars represent a distance of 20 µm. h) Cell viability of 4T1 or CTLL‐2 after being treated by DoxFILN −M70 or DoxFILN in pH 6.5. Data were presented as mean ± s.d. ( n = 3 biological replicates per group) and statistically analyzed using the Student's t ‐test. i) Mechanism of cell‐specific drug delivery by DoxFILN.
Pe Conjugated Anti Il15rα, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/pe-conjugated anti-il15rα/product/Thermo Fisher
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
pe-conjugated anti-il15rα - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Preparation and characterization of DoxFILN and their interaction with 4T1 or CTLL‐2 cells. a) Representative schemes and transmission electron microscope (TEM) images of I‐pBMDCN, Dox‐Fn, and DoxFILN in different pH. The samples were stained with 2% phosphotungstic acid. b) Size distribution of DoxFILN and Dox‐Fn in buffers of pH 6.5 or pH 7.4. All data were determined by a Zetasizer. c) The Dox release profiles of Dox‐Fn, DoxFILN −M70 , and DoxFILN in buffers of pH 5.0, pH 6.4, or pH 7.4. All data were presented as mean ± s.d. ( n = 3 samples per group). d) SDS‐PAGE protein analysis (top) and Western blot analysis of IL15Rα protein (bottom) in I‐pBMDCN, I‐pBMDC membrane, and DoxFILN. e) Profiles of the concentration of IL15c on DoxFILN in 72 h in pH 6.5 or pH 7.4. f) Flow cytometry determination of the cellular uptake of FITC‐labelled Fn and Cy5‐labelled membrane protein by 4T1 cells or CTLL‐2 cells after 4 h incubation with FILN −M70 or FILN in buffers of pH 6.5 (IL15c at 10 ng mL −1 equivalent). Data were presented as mean ± s.d. ( n = 3 biological replicates per group) and statistically analyzed using the Student's t ‐test. g) Representative confocal images showing intracellular localization of FITC‐labelled Fn and Cy5‐labelled membrane protein. The cells were stained with Hoechst 33 342 (blue). The scale bars represent a distance of 20 µm. h) Cell viability of 4T1 or CTLL‐2 after being treated by DoxFILN −M70 or DoxFILN in pH 6.5. Data were presented as mean ± s.d. ( n = 3 biological replicates per group) and statistically analyzed using the Student's t ‐test. i) Mechanism of cell‐specific drug delivery by DoxFILN.

Journal: Advanced Science

Article Title: Interleukin 15‐Presenting Nanovesicles with Doxorubicin‐Loaded Ferritin Cores for Cancer Immunochemotherapy

doi: 10.1002/advs.202409194

Figure Lengend Snippet: Preparation and characterization of DoxFILN and their interaction with 4T1 or CTLL‐2 cells. a) Representative schemes and transmission electron microscope (TEM) images of I‐pBMDCN, Dox‐Fn, and DoxFILN in different pH. The samples were stained with 2% phosphotungstic acid. b) Size distribution of DoxFILN and Dox‐Fn in buffers of pH 6.5 or pH 7.4. All data were determined by a Zetasizer. c) The Dox release profiles of Dox‐Fn, DoxFILN −M70 , and DoxFILN in buffers of pH 5.0, pH 6.4, or pH 7.4. All data were presented as mean ± s.d. ( n = 3 samples per group). d) SDS‐PAGE protein analysis (top) and Western blot analysis of IL15Rα protein (bottom) in I‐pBMDCN, I‐pBMDC membrane, and DoxFILN. e) Profiles of the concentration of IL15c on DoxFILN in 72 h in pH 6.5 or pH 7.4. f) Flow cytometry determination of the cellular uptake of FITC‐labelled Fn and Cy5‐labelled membrane protein by 4T1 cells or CTLL‐2 cells after 4 h incubation with FILN −M70 or FILN in buffers of pH 6.5 (IL15c at 10 ng mL −1 equivalent). Data were presented as mean ± s.d. ( n = 3 biological replicates per group) and statistically analyzed using the Student's t ‐test. g) Representative confocal images showing intracellular localization of FITC‐labelled Fn and Cy5‐labelled membrane protein. The cells were stained with Hoechst 33 342 (blue). The scale bars represent a distance of 20 µm. h) Cell viability of 4T1 or CTLL‐2 after being treated by DoxFILN −M70 or DoxFILN in pH 6.5. Data were presented as mean ± s.d. ( n = 3 biological replicates per group) and statistically analyzed using the Student's t ‐test. i) Mechanism of cell‐specific drug delivery by DoxFILN.

Article Snippet: The primary antibodies used for Western blot were against IL15Rα (R&D, AF551), IL2RG (proteintech, 11409‐1‐AP), Transferrin Receptor (abcam, cat. no. ab214039), Phospho‐Jak1 (Cell Signaling Technology, 74129S), Phospho‐Stat5 (Cell Signaling Technology, 4322T).

Techniques: Transmission Assay, Microscopy, Staining, SDS Page, Western Blot, Membrane, Concentration Assay, Flow Cytometry, Incubation