a375 human metastatic melanoma cells (ATCC)
ATCC is a verified supplier
ATCC manufactures this product
Structured Review
A375 Human Metastatic Melanoma Cells, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/a375 human metastatic melanoma cells/product/ATCC
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
Images
1) Product Images from "First in vitro cell co-culture experiments using laser-induced high-energy electron FLASH irradiation for the development of anti-cancer therapeutic strategies"
Article Title: First in vitro cell co-culture experiments using laser-induced high-energy electron FLASH irradiation for the development of anti-cancer therapeutic strategies
Journal: Scientific Reports
doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-65137-7
Figure Legend Snippet: Image cytometry analysis strategy of irradiated A375:NHEM co-cultures. Upon labelling with antibodies against p-γ-H2AX (red) and with Hoechst for nuclear DNA (blue), samples were automatically scanned using the TissueFAXSiPlus imaging system. After regions of interest (ROIs) reconstitution out of stitched individual fields of view (FOV), the obtained images were imported into the TissueQuest image quantification software. Each cell was identified based on nuclear DAPI signal by the segmentation algorithm. Next, scattergrams were generated based on DAPI-Eccentricity versus DAPI-Mean Intensity profiles and cell lines differentiated based on nuclear elongation (eccentricity): elongated nuclei of NHEM were gated (red gate) based on higher eccentricity values, while non-elongated A375 nuclei were gated (blue gate) based on low eccentricity values. Using forward gating, one can identify the scattergram displayed signals for each cell in a population. Here, we exemplify a NHEM nucleus encircled in red and an A375 nucleus encircled in green and their corresponding signals in the scattergrams (high vs. low elongation). In order to quantify p-γ-H2AX mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) and number of foci per nucleus, TxRed signals from the nuclear mask were quantified using 2 parameters: Texa-Mean Intensity and Texa_DOTS_ON_DAPI-Dots Count, respectively, visible on the axes. Histograms displaying frequency distribution of number of foci per nucleus are displayed in blue for each cell population. Also, scattergrams of number of foci versus p-γ-H2AX expression level can be generated. Here, red bars and dots identify the selected nuclei in the picture. Foci are indicated by white arrows (in NHEM) or arrowheads (in A375).
Techniques Used: Cytometry, Irradiation, Imaging, Software, Generated, Fluorescence, Expressing
Figure Legend Snippet: Analysis of the A375 melanoma and NHEM co-cultures upon laser-plasma accelerated electron exposure during 2 sequentially performed irradiation experiments (PW1, PW2) versus pulsed X-ray irradiation. ( a , c ) Correspondence between the irradiated GF fingerprint and selected areas of the SlideFlasks for image cytometry analysis (5 × magnification preview mode). ( b , d , e , f ) DNA damage response revealed as p-γ-H2AX foci at 30 min post-exposure to PW or X-ray-generated radiation versus non-exposed (untreated) or mock-exposed (PW env) negative controls. Immunofluorescence microscopy images of overlapping DAPI and TxRed signals (top), as well as grayscale images of the TxRed signal (bottom) of a representative field of view (FOV) under each irradiation condition, are shown. The p-γ-H2AX foci are visible in the detailed insets ( b , d , f —bottom right). Scale bar = 20 μm ( b , d , f ) or 100 μm ( e ).
Techniques Used: Irradiation, Cytometry, Generated, Immunofluorescence, Microscopy
Figure Legend Snippet: Comparison of “number of p-γ-H2AX foci per nucleus” values for each tested irradiation condition. The bar graphs show the comparisons between treatments for the overall A375 and NHEM co-cultures ( a ), for the A375 cells in co-cultures ( b ), and for the NHEM cells in co-cultures ( c ). Sampled areas of PW-irradiated specimens and the standard pulsed X-ray-irradiated cells were compared to non-irradiated controls. Medians of each data set and 95% confidence intervals are displayed. The statistical differences were determined using the nonparametric Mann–Whitney test, (n = 4473–10,629 analysed nuclei, * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001, ns = not significant).
Techniques Used: Comparison, Irradiation, MANN-WHITNEY