Review



ct26 cell lines  (ATCC)


Bioz Verified Symbol ATCC is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol ATCC manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 86

    Structured Review

    ATCC ct26 cell lines
    Ct26 Cell Lines, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/ct26 cell lines/product/ATCC
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
    ct26 cell lines - by Bioz Stars, 2024-10
    86/100 stars

    Images



    Similar Products

    86
    ATCC ct26 cell lines
    Ct26 Cell Lines, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/ct26 cell lines/product/ATCC
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
    ct26 cell lines - by Bioz Stars, 2024-10
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    Procell Inc ct26 murine colorectal cancer cell line
    Ct26 Murine Colorectal Cancer Cell Line, supplied by Procell Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/ct26 murine colorectal cancer cell line/product/Procell Inc
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
    ct26 murine colorectal cancer cell line - by Bioz Stars, 2024-10
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    Keygen Biotech ct26 cells
    Ct26 Cells, supplied by Keygen Biotech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/ct26 cells/product/Keygen Biotech
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
    ct26 cells - by Bioz Stars, 2024-10
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    Beyotime ct26 cells
    Ct26 Cells, supplied by Beyotime, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/ct26 cells/product/Beyotime
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
    ct26 cells - by Bioz Stars, 2024-10
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    Beijing Solarbio Science mitochondrial membrane potential ct26 cells
    Mitochondrial Membrane Potential Ct26 Cells, supplied by Beijing Solarbio Science, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/mitochondrial membrane potential ct26 cells/product/Beijing Solarbio Science
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
    mitochondrial membrane potential ct26 cells - by Bioz Stars, 2024-10
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    Thermo Fisher ct26 cells
    Ct26 Cells, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/ct26 cells/product/Thermo Fisher
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
    ct26 cells - by Bioz Stars, 2024-10
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    Thermo Fisher crc cell line ct26
    CS/NPs uptake and cytotoxicity. A , B Representative flow cytometry images depicting <t>CT26</t> and RKO cell uptake following incubation with CS/NPs at different points in the experiment. C , D Flow cytometry images of uptake by CT26 and RKO cells after different treatments. E , F Viability of CT26 and RKO cells treated with different samples ( n = 3). G – J Assessment of colony formation and quantitative metrics in CT26 and RKO cell. K – N Fluorescence imaging and quantitative analysis of EdU labeling experiments in CT26 and RKO cells following various treatments. O – R Apoptosis in CT26 and RKO cells treated with different samples ( n = 3). *** p < 0.001
    Crc Cell Line Ct26, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/crc cell line ct26/product/Thermo Fisher
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
    crc cell line ct26 - by Bioz Stars, 2024-10
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    ATCC ct26 cells
    Pharmacokinetic properties of the pmIL12 GET. The percentage of organs/tissues positive for the pmIL12 plasmid was confirmed in various organs at different time points: day 2 ( A ), day 8 ( B ), day 14 ( C ), and long-term ( D ) after GET with three different doses of pmIL12 into <t>CT26</t> tumors. ( E ) The number of copies of the pmIL12 plasmid in the skin above and around the tumor after pmIL12 GET into CT26 tumors. Green * P < 0.05 versus day 2 0.5 mg/ml, red * P < 0.05 vs day 2 1 mg/ml, ns—not statistically significant.
    Ct26 Cells, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/ct26 cells/product/ATCC
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
    ct26 cells - by Bioz Stars, 2024-10
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    CS/NPs uptake and cytotoxicity. A , B Representative flow cytometry images depicting CT26 and RKO cell uptake following incubation with CS/NPs at different points in the experiment. C , D Flow cytometry images of uptake by CT26 and RKO cells after different treatments. E , F Viability of CT26 and RKO cells treated with different samples ( n = 3). G – J Assessment of colony formation and quantitative metrics in CT26 and RKO cell. K – N Fluorescence imaging and quantitative analysis of EdU labeling experiments in CT26 and RKO cells following various treatments. O – R Apoptosis in CT26 and RKO cells treated with different samples ( n = 3). *** p < 0.001

    Journal: Journal of Nanobiotechnology

    Article Title: A metal-organic nanoframework for efficient colorectal cancer immunotherapy by the cGAS-STING pathway activation and immune checkpoint blockade

    doi: 10.1186/s12951-024-02836-3

    Figure Lengend Snippet: CS/NPs uptake and cytotoxicity. A , B Representative flow cytometry images depicting CT26 and RKO cell uptake following incubation with CS/NPs at different points in the experiment. C , D Flow cytometry images of uptake by CT26 and RKO cells after different treatments. E , F Viability of CT26 and RKO cells treated with different samples ( n = 3). G – J Assessment of colony formation and quantitative metrics in CT26 and RKO cell. K – N Fluorescence imaging and quantitative analysis of EdU labeling experiments in CT26 and RKO cells following various treatments. O – R Apoptosis in CT26 and RKO cells treated with different samples ( n = 3). *** p < 0.001

    Article Snippet: The mouse-derived CRC cell line CT26 and the human-derived CRC cell line RKO was conducted in RPMI 1640 medium (Gibco) by adding 1% penicillin-streptomycin and 10% FBS.

    Techniques: Flow Cytometry, Incubation, Fluorescence, Imaging, Labeling

    CS/NPs biodistribution and anti-tumor efficacy in-vivo. A Quantitative analysis and real-time fluorescence imaging in-vivo of the CT26-Luc subcutaneous tumor model. B Fluorescence intensity analysis ex vivo in primary organs and tumor tissues. C Schematic illustration of in-vivo drug treatment in the unilateral mouse tumor model. D Body weight modifications across six mouse cohorts under different drug treatments ( n = 5). E Comparison of tumor volume curves ( n = 5). F – K Tumor volume change curves ( n = 5). L Corresponding tumor photographs, scale bar: 1 cm ( n = 5). M Average tumor weight and inhibition rate ( n = 5). N Images depicting tumor tissues collected from various groups subjected to Ki67 immunohistochemistry, and H&E staining. With a Scale bar: 50 μm. *** p < 0.001

    Journal: Journal of Nanobiotechnology

    Article Title: A metal-organic nanoframework for efficient colorectal cancer immunotherapy by the cGAS-STING pathway activation and immune checkpoint blockade

    doi: 10.1186/s12951-024-02836-3

    Figure Lengend Snippet: CS/NPs biodistribution and anti-tumor efficacy in-vivo. A Quantitative analysis and real-time fluorescence imaging in-vivo of the CT26-Luc subcutaneous tumor model. B Fluorescence intensity analysis ex vivo in primary organs and tumor tissues. C Schematic illustration of in-vivo drug treatment in the unilateral mouse tumor model. D Body weight modifications across six mouse cohorts under different drug treatments ( n = 5). E Comparison of tumor volume curves ( n = 5). F – K Tumor volume change curves ( n = 5). L Corresponding tumor photographs, scale bar: 1 cm ( n = 5). M Average tumor weight and inhibition rate ( n = 5). N Images depicting tumor tissues collected from various groups subjected to Ki67 immunohistochemistry, and H&E staining. With a Scale bar: 50 μm. *** p < 0.001

    Article Snippet: The mouse-derived CRC cell line CT26 and the human-derived CRC cell line RKO was conducted in RPMI 1640 medium (Gibco) by adding 1% penicillin-streptomycin and 10% FBS.

    Techniques: In Vivo, Fluorescence, Imaging, Ex Vivo, Comparison, Inhibition, Immunohistochemistry, Staining

    CS/NPs induce cGAS-STING-mediated enhancement of distant tumor immunity. A Schematic representation of treatment for a bilateral subcutaneous Luc-CT26 tumor bearing model. B Corresponding primary tumor photographs, scale bar: 1 cm. C Comparison of primary tumor volume curves for the six groups during different drug treatments ( n = 5). D Average tumor weights and inhibition rates ( n = 5). E Corresponding distant tumor photographs, scale bar: 1 cm ( n = 5). F Tumor volume curves ( n = 5). G Average tumor weights and inhibition rates ( n = 5). H H&E and immunohistochemical Ki67 staining In primary tumor tissue for each group, scale bar: 50 μm. I H&E and immunohistochemical Ki67 staining in distant tumor tissue, scale bar: 50 μm. *** p < 0.001

    Journal: Journal of Nanobiotechnology

    Article Title: A metal-organic nanoframework for efficient colorectal cancer immunotherapy by the cGAS-STING pathway activation and immune checkpoint blockade

    doi: 10.1186/s12951-024-02836-3

    Figure Lengend Snippet: CS/NPs induce cGAS-STING-mediated enhancement of distant tumor immunity. A Schematic representation of treatment for a bilateral subcutaneous Luc-CT26 tumor bearing model. B Corresponding primary tumor photographs, scale bar: 1 cm. C Comparison of primary tumor volume curves for the six groups during different drug treatments ( n = 5). D Average tumor weights and inhibition rates ( n = 5). E Corresponding distant tumor photographs, scale bar: 1 cm ( n = 5). F Tumor volume curves ( n = 5). G Average tumor weights and inhibition rates ( n = 5). H H&E and immunohistochemical Ki67 staining In primary tumor tissue for each group, scale bar: 50 μm. I H&E and immunohistochemical Ki67 staining in distant tumor tissue, scale bar: 50 μm. *** p < 0.001

    Article Snippet: The mouse-derived CRC cell line CT26 and the human-derived CRC cell line RKO was conducted in RPMI 1640 medium (Gibco) by adding 1% penicillin-streptomycin and 10% FBS.

    Techniques: Comparison, Inhibition, Immunohistochemical staining, Staining

    Pharmacokinetic properties of the pmIL12 GET. The percentage of organs/tissues positive for the pmIL12 plasmid was confirmed in various organs at different time points: day 2 ( A ), day 8 ( B ), day 14 ( C ), and long-term ( D ) after GET with three different doses of pmIL12 into CT26 tumors. ( E ) The number of copies of the pmIL12 plasmid in the skin above and around the tumor after pmIL12 GET into CT26 tumors. Green * P < 0.05 versus day 2 0.5 mg/ml, red * P < 0.05 vs day 2 1 mg/ml, ns—not statistically significant.

    Journal: Scientific Reports

    Article Title: Non-clinical evaluation of pmIL12 gene therapy for approval of the phase I clinical study

    doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-73314-x

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Pharmacokinetic properties of the pmIL12 GET. The percentage of organs/tissues positive for the pmIL12 plasmid was confirmed in various organs at different time points: day 2 ( A ), day 8 ( B ), day 14 ( C ), and long-term ( D ) after GET with three different doses of pmIL12 into CT26 tumors. ( E ) The number of copies of the pmIL12 plasmid in the skin above and around the tumor after pmIL12 GET into CT26 tumors. Green * P < 0.05 versus day 2 0.5 mg/ml, red * P < 0.05 vs day 2 1 mg/ml, ns—not statistically significant.

    Article Snippet: After quarantine, the mice were shaved with clippers on one flank, and tumors were induced via the subcutaneous injection of 0.3 × 10 6 CT26 cells (CRL-2638™, ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA) in 100 µL of saline with a syringe with a 27G needle.

    Techniques: Plasmid Preparation

    Weights of the mice and IgG and IgM antibody levels as measures of the systemic toxicity of pmIL12 GET. Weight curves of BALB/c males ( A ) and females ( B ) with induced CT26 tumors that were treated with pmIL12 GET at three different doses: 0.5 mg/ml, 1 mg/ml, or 2 mg/ml. Control, untreated mice (Ctrl) that did not receive pmIL12 or electric pulses. Total serum levels of IgG ( C —males, D —females) and IgM ( E —males, F —females) antibodies after pmIL12 GET in CT26 tumors treated with three different doses of pmIL12: 0.5 mg/ml, 1 mg/ml, or 2 mg/ml. Control, untreated mice (Ctrl) that did not receive pmIL12 or electric pulses. Naïve mice (naïve) were tumor free and did not receive pmIL12 or GET. ns— P > 0.05 versus naïve.

    Journal: Scientific Reports

    Article Title: Non-clinical evaluation of pmIL12 gene therapy for approval of the phase I clinical study

    doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-73314-x

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Weights of the mice and IgG and IgM antibody levels as measures of the systemic toxicity of pmIL12 GET. Weight curves of BALB/c males ( A ) and females ( B ) with induced CT26 tumors that were treated with pmIL12 GET at three different doses: 0.5 mg/ml, 1 mg/ml, or 2 mg/ml. Control, untreated mice (Ctrl) that did not receive pmIL12 or electric pulses. Total serum levels of IgG ( C —males, D —females) and IgM ( E —males, F —females) antibodies after pmIL12 GET in CT26 tumors treated with three different doses of pmIL12: 0.5 mg/ml, 1 mg/ml, or 2 mg/ml. Control, untreated mice (Ctrl) that did not receive pmIL12 or electric pulses. Naïve mice (naïve) were tumor free and did not receive pmIL12 or GET. ns— P > 0.05 versus naïve.

    Article Snippet: After quarantine, the mice were shaved with clippers on one flank, and tumors were induced via the subcutaneous injection of 0.3 × 10 6 CT26 cells (CRL-2638™, ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA) in 100 µL of saline with a syringe with a 27G needle.

    Techniques: Control