cpg max with sali hf  (New England Biolabs)


Bioz Verified Symbol New England Biolabs is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol New England Biolabs manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 95

    Structured Review

    New England Biolabs cpg max with sali hf
    Fitness comparison between WT and mutant ZIKV in human and mosquito cells. Human A549 cells, A549 ZAP knockout cells, and AP-61 mosquito cells were infected with equal RNA concentrations of WT ZIKV mixed with either the SCR (A) , <t>CpG-high</t> viruses (CpG_1.0 and CpG_max) (B, C), or UpA_max (D) . Virus was passaged to new cells twice, before total RNA was isolated. ZIKV RNA was amplified with RT-PCR and digested with BsaI (A), <t>SalI</t> (B, C), or HeaIII (D) restriction enzymes to distinguish between WT and the respective mutant viruses. DNA gel images display the largest most distinctive products from each digestion. For more information, see S3 Fig . From left to right images display the digested DNA of the indicated individual viruses, followed by 2 independent experimental repeats performed with separately rescued virus populations (numbered 1 and 2). RT-PCR, reverse transcription PCR; SCR, scrambled control virus; WT, wild-type; ZAP, zinc-finger antiviral protein; ZIKV, Zika virus.
    Cpg Max With Sali Hf, supplied by New England Biolabs, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 2 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/cpg max with sali hf/product/New England Biolabs
    Average 95 stars, based on 2 article reviews
    Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
    cpg max with sali hf - by Bioz Stars, 2022-09
    95/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "The dinucleotide composition of the Zika virus genome is shaped by conflicting evolutionary pressures in mammalian hosts and mosquito vectors"

    Article Title: The dinucleotide composition of the Zika virus genome is shaped by conflicting evolutionary pressures in mammalian hosts and mosquito vectors

    Journal: PLoS Biology

    doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001201

    Fitness comparison between WT and mutant ZIKV in human and mosquito cells. Human A549 cells, A549 ZAP knockout cells, and AP-61 mosquito cells were infected with equal RNA concentrations of WT ZIKV mixed with either the SCR (A) , CpG-high viruses (CpG_1.0 and CpG_max) (B, C), or UpA_max (D) . Virus was passaged to new cells twice, before total RNA was isolated. ZIKV RNA was amplified with RT-PCR and digested with BsaI (A), SalI (B, C), or HeaIII (D) restriction enzymes to distinguish between WT and the respective mutant viruses. DNA gel images display the largest most distinctive products from each digestion. For more information, see S3 Fig . From left to right images display the digested DNA of the indicated individual viruses, followed by 2 independent experimental repeats performed with separately rescued virus populations (numbered 1 and 2). RT-PCR, reverse transcription PCR; SCR, scrambled control virus; WT, wild-type; ZAP, zinc-finger antiviral protein; ZIKV, Zika virus.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Fitness comparison between WT and mutant ZIKV in human and mosquito cells. Human A549 cells, A549 ZAP knockout cells, and AP-61 mosquito cells were infected with equal RNA concentrations of WT ZIKV mixed with either the SCR (A) , CpG-high viruses (CpG_1.0 and CpG_max) (B, C), or UpA_max (D) . Virus was passaged to new cells twice, before total RNA was isolated. ZIKV RNA was amplified with RT-PCR and digested with BsaI (A), SalI (B, C), or HeaIII (D) restriction enzymes to distinguish between WT and the respective mutant viruses. DNA gel images display the largest most distinctive products from each digestion. For more information, see S3 Fig . From left to right images display the digested DNA of the indicated individual viruses, followed by 2 independent experimental repeats performed with separately rescued virus populations (numbered 1 and 2). RT-PCR, reverse transcription PCR; SCR, scrambled control virus; WT, wild-type; ZAP, zinc-finger antiviral protein; ZIKV, Zika virus.

    Techniques Used: Mutagenesis, Knock-Out, Infection, Isolation, Amplification, Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction, Polymerase Chain Reaction

    2) Product Images from "An adaptive compromise - Conflicting evolutionary pressures on arthropod-borne Zika virus dinucleotide composition in mammalian hosts and mosquito vectors"

    Article Title: An adaptive compromise - Conflicting evolutionary pressures on arthropod-borne Zika virus dinucleotide composition in mammalian hosts and mosquito vectors

    Journal: bioRxiv

    doi: 10.1101/2021.02.09.430415

    Fitness comparison between WT and mutant ZIKV in human and mosquito cells. Human A549 cells, A549 ZAP knockout cells and AP-61 mosquito cells were infected with equal RNA concentrations of WT ZIKV mixed with either the scrambled control virus (SCR) (A) , CpG-high viruses (CpG_1.0 and CpG_max) (B,C) or UpA_max (D) . Virus was passaged to new cells twice, before total RNA was isolated. ZIKV RNA was amplified with RT-PCR and digested with BsaI (A), SalI (B,C) or HeaIII (D) restriction enzymes to distinguish between WT and the respective mutant viruses. DNA gel images display the largest most distinctive products from each digestion. For more information see S3 Fig. From left to right images display the digested DNA of the indicated individual viruses, followed by two independent experimental repeats performed with separately rescued virus populations (numbered 1 and 2).
    Figure Legend Snippet: Fitness comparison between WT and mutant ZIKV in human and mosquito cells. Human A549 cells, A549 ZAP knockout cells and AP-61 mosquito cells were infected with equal RNA concentrations of WT ZIKV mixed with either the scrambled control virus (SCR) (A) , CpG-high viruses (CpG_1.0 and CpG_max) (B,C) or UpA_max (D) . Virus was passaged to new cells twice, before total RNA was isolated. ZIKV RNA was amplified with RT-PCR and digested with BsaI (A), SalI (B,C) or HeaIII (D) restriction enzymes to distinguish between WT and the respective mutant viruses. DNA gel images display the largest most distinctive products from each digestion. For more information see S3 Fig. From left to right images display the digested DNA of the indicated individual viruses, followed by two independent experimental repeats performed with separately rescued virus populations (numbered 1 and 2).

    Techniques Used: Mutagenesis, Knock-Out, Infection, Isolation, Amplification, Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction

    Similar Products

  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 95
    New England Biolabs cpg max with sali hf
    Fitness comparison between WT and mutant ZIKV in human and mosquito cells. Human A549 cells, A549 ZAP knockout cells, and AP-61 mosquito cells were infected with equal RNA concentrations of WT ZIKV mixed with either the SCR (A) , <t>CpG-high</t> viruses (CpG_1.0 and CpG_max) (B, C), or UpA_max (D) . Virus was passaged to new cells twice, before total RNA was isolated. ZIKV RNA was amplified with RT-PCR and digested with BsaI (A), <t>SalI</t> (B, C), or HeaIII (D) restriction enzymes to distinguish between WT and the respective mutant viruses. DNA gel images display the largest most distinctive products from each digestion. For more information, see S3 Fig . From left to right images display the digested DNA of the indicated individual viruses, followed by 2 independent experimental repeats performed with separately rescued virus populations (numbered 1 and 2). RT-PCR, reverse transcription PCR; SCR, scrambled control virus; WT, wild-type; ZAP, zinc-finger antiviral protein; ZIKV, Zika virus.
    Cpg Max With Sali Hf, supplied by New England Biolabs, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/cpg max with sali hf/product/New England Biolabs
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
    cpg max with sali hf - by Bioz Stars, 2022-09
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Fitness comparison between WT and mutant ZIKV in human and mosquito cells. Human A549 cells, A549 ZAP knockout cells, and AP-61 mosquito cells were infected with equal RNA concentrations of WT ZIKV mixed with either the SCR (A) , CpG-high viruses (CpG_1.0 and CpG_max) (B, C), or UpA_max (D) . Virus was passaged to new cells twice, before total RNA was isolated. ZIKV RNA was amplified with RT-PCR and digested with BsaI (A), SalI (B, C), or HeaIII (D) restriction enzymes to distinguish between WT and the respective mutant viruses. DNA gel images display the largest most distinctive products from each digestion. For more information, see S3 Fig . From left to right images display the digested DNA of the indicated individual viruses, followed by 2 independent experimental repeats performed with separately rescued virus populations (numbered 1 and 2). RT-PCR, reverse transcription PCR; SCR, scrambled control virus; WT, wild-type; ZAP, zinc-finger antiviral protein; ZIKV, Zika virus.

    Journal: PLoS Biology

    Article Title: The dinucleotide composition of the Zika virus genome is shaped by conflicting evolutionary pressures in mammalian hosts and mosquito vectors

    doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001201

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Fitness comparison between WT and mutant ZIKV in human and mosquito cells. Human A549 cells, A549 ZAP knockout cells, and AP-61 mosquito cells were infected with equal RNA concentrations of WT ZIKV mixed with either the SCR (A) , CpG-high viruses (CpG_1.0 and CpG_max) (B, C), or UpA_max (D) . Virus was passaged to new cells twice, before total RNA was isolated. ZIKV RNA was amplified with RT-PCR and digested with BsaI (A), SalI (B, C), or HeaIII (D) restriction enzymes to distinguish between WT and the respective mutant viruses. DNA gel images display the largest most distinctive products from each digestion. For more information, see S3 Fig . From left to right images display the digested DNA of the indicated individual viruses, followed by 2 independent experimental repeats performed with separately rescued virus populations (numbered 1 and 2). RT-PCR, reverse transcription PCR; SCR, scrambled control virus; WT, wild-type; ZAP, zinc-finger antiviral protein; ZIKV, Zika virus.

    Article Snippet: The resulting DNA amplicons from the comparisons between WT and SRC were digested with BsaI-HFv2 (New England Biolabs), WT and CpG_1.0 or CpG_max with SalI-HF (New England Biolabs) and WT and UpA_max with HaeIII (Invitrogen) and ran on 2% agarose gels.

    Techniques: Mutagenesis, Knock-Out, Infection, Isolation, Amplification, Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction, Polymerase Chain Reaction

    Fitness comparison between WT and mutant ZIKV in human and mosquito cells. Human A549 cells, A549 ZAP knockout cells and AP-61 mosquito cells were infected with equal RNA concentrations of WT ZIKV mixed with either the scrambled control virus (SCR) (A) , CpG-high viruses (CpG_1.0 and CpG_max) (B,C) or UpA_max (D) . Virus was passaged to new cells twice, before total RNA was isolated. ZIKV RNA was amplified with RT-PCR and digested with BsaI (A), SalI (B,C) or HeaIII (D) restriction enzymes to distinguish between WT and the respective mutant viruses. DNA gel images display the largest most distinctive products from each digestion. For more information see S3 Fig. From left to right images display the digested DNA of the indicated individual viruses, followed by two independent experimental repeats performed with separately rescued virus populations (numbered 1 and 2).

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: An adaptive compromise - Conflicting evolutionary pressures on arthropod-borne Zika virus dinucleotide composition in mammalian hosts and mosquito vectors

    doi: 10.1101/2021.02.09.430415

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Fitness comparison between WT and mutant ZIKV in human and mosquito cells. Human A549 cells, A549 ZAP knockout cells and AP-61 mosquito cells were infected with equal RNA concentrations of WT ZIKV mixed with either the scrambled control virus (SCR) (A) , CpG-high viruses (CpG_1.0 and CpG_max) (B,C) or UpA_max (D) . Virus was passaged to new cells twice, before total RNA was isolated. ZIKV RNA was amplified with RT-PCR and digested with BsaI (A), SalI (B,C) or HeaIII (D) restriction enzymes to distinguish between WT and the respective mutant viruses. DNA gel images display the largest most distinctive products from each digestion. For more information see S3 Fig. From left to right images display the digested DNA of the indicated individual viruses, followed by two independent experimental repeats performed with separately rescued virus populations (numbered 1 and 2).

    Article Snippet: The resulting DNA amplicons from the comparisons between WT and SRC were digested with BsaI-HFv2 (New England Biolabs), WT and CpG_1.0 or CpG_max with SalI-HF (New England Biolabs) and WT and UpA_max with HaeIII (Invitrogen) and ran on 2% agarose gels.

    Techniques: Mutagenesis, Knock-Out, Infection, Isolation, Amplification, Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction