Thermo Fisher
pcris pitchv2 bsd r dtag cdk12 ![]() Pcris Pitchv2 Bsd R Dtag Cdk12, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/pcris pitchv2 bsd r dtag cdk12/product/Thermo Fisher Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
pcris pitchv2 bsd r dtag cdk12 - by Bioz Stars,
2025-03
86/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
Thermo Fisher
px330a cdk12 pitch ![]() Px330a Cdk12 Pitch, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/px330a cdk12 pitch/product/Thermo Fisher Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
px330a cdk12 pitch - by Bioz Stars,
2025-03
86/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
New England Biolabs
cdk12 locus ![]() Cdk12 Locus, supplied by New England Biolabs, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/cdk12 locus/product/New England Biolabs Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cdk12 locus - by Bioz Stars,
2025-03
86/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
Clovis Oncology
clovis oncology cdk12 ![]() Clovis Oncology Cdk12, supplied by Clovis Oncology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/clovis oncology cdk12/product/Clovis Oncology Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
clovis oncology cdk12 - by Bioz Stars,
2025-03
86/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
Merck & Co
cdk12 ![]() Cdk12, supplied by Merck & Co, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/cdk12/product/Merck & Co Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cdk12 - by Bioz Stars,
2025-03
86/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
Pfizer Inc
clovis oncology cdk12 ![]() Clovis Oncology Cdk12, supplied by Pfizer Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/clovis oncology cdk12/product/Pfizer Inc Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
clovis oncology cdk12 - by Bioz Stars,
2025-03
86/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
Eurofins
cdk12 cyclin k ![]() Cdk12 Cyclin K, supplied by Eurofins, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/cdk12 cyclin k/product/Eurofins Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cdk12 cyclin k - by Bioz Stars,
2025-03
86/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
Molecular Dynamics Inc
cdk12 cyclink ![]() Cdk12 Cyclink, supplied by Molecular Dynamics Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/cdk12 cyclink/product/Molecular Dynamics Inc Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cdk12 cyclink - by Bioz Stars,
2025-03
86/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
Cell Signaling Technology Inc
anti cdk12 ![]() Anti Cdk12, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/anti cdk12/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti cdk12 - by Bioz Stars,
2025-03
86/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
Journal: bioRxiv
Article Title: CDK12/13 inhibition disrupts nucleolar morphology and promotes aberrant expression of IGS transcripts
doi: 10.1101/2025.03.01.640972
Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Schematic model of nucleolar structure (left). Immunofluorescence (IF) analysis of the indicated nucleolar marker expression in OS cells incubated with E9 (200 nM x 6 h). Scale bar, 5 μm. (B) IF analysis of H3K9me3 staining in OS cells treated as in (A). Scale bar, 10 μm, inset, 1 μm. (C) RNA-ISH analysis of 28S rRNA in OS cells treated as in (A). Scale bar, 10 μm. (D) RT-qPCR analysis of rRNA expression in OS cells treated with E9 as in A or BSJ-4-116 (500 mM x 6 h). GAPDH was used as loading control. Data represent mean ± standard deviation (S.D.) of 3 independent replicates. (E). RT-qPCR analysis of rRNA expression (right) at the regions corresponding to the schematic model of the rDNA tandem repetitive structure (left) in OS cells treated as in (D). Blue boxes represent the 47S rDNA region. H4 and H13 represent primers binding to 18S and 28S, respectively. ITS-1 (Intragenic Spacer 1); ITS-2 (Intragenic Spacer 2); 3’-ETS (3’-Externally Transcribed Spacer); IGS (intergenic spacer); Pol I TES (Pol I Transcription End Site). GAPDH was used as loading control. Data represent mean ± S.D. of 3 independent replicates. * P < 0.05, and *** P < 0.0001, one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test. (F) RT-qPCR analysis of rRNA expression in 143B CDK12 dTAG cells transfected with siControl and treated with DMSO or 1 µM dTAG13 (left), transfected with siControl or siCDK13 (middle), and transfected with siCDK13 and treated with DMSO or 1 µM dTAG13 (right). dTAG13 treatment and CDK13 knockdown were performed for 2 or 4 days. GAPDH was used as loading control. Data represent mean ± S.D. of 2 independent replicates. * P < 0.05, and ** P < 0.001, one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test.
Article Snippet: Next, 143B cells were seeded onto 10 cm plates and co-transfected with 1 µg of
Techniques: Immunofluorescence, Marker, Expressing, Incubation, Staining, Quantitative RT-PCR, Control, Standard Deviation, Binding Assay, Transfection, Knockdown
Journal: bioRxiv
Article Title: CDK12/13 inhibition disrupts nucleolar morphology and promotes aberrant expression of IGS transcripts
doi: 10.1101/2025.03.01.640972
Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) RT-qPCR analysis of 18S, 28S and IGS expression (at the regions indicated in the cartoon above) in OS cells treated with E9 (200 nM x 6 h). (B) RT-qPCR analysis of the indicated rRNAs in OS cells treated with E9 (200 nM) for the indicated times. Data represent mean ± S.D. of 2 independent replicates in A and B. (C) RT-qPCR analysis of 18S and H16 IGS region in OS cells incubated with BSJ-4-116 (500 nM x 6 h) or CR8 (600 nM x 6 h). Data represent mean ± S.D. of 3 independent replicates. GAPDH was used as loading control in all three assays. (D) Integrative Genomics Viewer (IGV) tracks of RNA expression in forward and reverse orientations from analysis of published RNA sequencing data sets of the indicated cell lines treated with CDK12/13 inhibitors at the following doses and durations: HEK293T: THZ531 (400 nM x 6 h); THP-1: THZ531 (200 nM x 6 h); KBM7: THZ531 (600 nM x 5 h); JURKAT: THZ531 (250 nM x 8 h); 143B: E9 (200 nM x 6 h); KELLY: 400 nM (THZ531 x 6 h). The y-axis scale indicates the range of normalized read coverage for each sample. Data set accession numbers are given in Supplemental Table 2. Dashed lines, H16 locus. (E) Northern blot analysis of RNA from OS cells treated with E9 (200 nM x 6 h) or NVP-2 (50 nM x 6 h). Equal loading across the samples is indicated by SYBR gold staining (left panels) of total RNA. The H16 transcripts were detected using radiolabeled probes targeting the forward ( P-Forward) or reverse ( P-Reverse) strands.
Article Snippet: Next, 143B cells were seeded onto 10 cm plates and co-transfected with 1 µg of
Techniques: Quantitative RT-PCR, Expressing, Incubation, Control, RNA Expression, RNA Sequencing, Northern Blot, Staining
Journal: bioRxiv
Article Title: CDK12/13 inhibition disrupts nucleolar morphology and promotes aberrant expression of IGS transcripts
doi: 10.1101/2025.03.01.640972
Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Heatmap showing the differential expression levels of RNA exosome and nuclear exosome co-factors in IMR32, Kelly, MG63.3, and 143B cells treated with THZ531 (500 nM x 6 h) or E9 (200 nM x 6 h) compared to DMSO treated control. Expression levels were obtained from public RNA-seq datasets GSE113314 and GSE132233 from the GEO database. Differential expression is represented as log2(fold change), with upregulation shown in red and downregulation in blue. (B) Violin plot showing the average gene length of core RNA exosome, NEXT, PAXT and TRAMP components. (C) IF analysis of poly(A) and 28S rRNA in OS cells transfected with siRNA against ZCCHC7 or TENT4A mRNA and incubated with E9 (200 nM x 6 h). Scale bar, 5 μm, inset, 1 μm. (D) IF analysis of the same markers as in (C) in OS cells treated with E9 (200 nM x 6 h) and/or RG-7834 (10 μM x 6 h). Scale bar, 5 μm, inset, 1 μm. (E) RIP-qPCR analysis of MTREX binding to 18S, 28S, H16 and H27 rRNAs in OS cells treated with E9 (200 nM x 6 h). Data represent mean ± S.D. of 2 independent replicates. RNA enrichment was calculated as (% of input of rRNA or IGS)/(% of input of GAPDH). (F) IF analysis of 28S rRNA and MTREX in OS cells treated as in (E). Scale bar, 5 μm. (G) RIP-qPCR analysis of EXOSC2 binding to 18S, 28S, H16 and H27 rRNAs in OS cells treated as in (E). Data represent mean ± S.D. of 2 independent replicates. RNA enrichment was calculated as in (E). (H) Schematic model for pAR rings accumulation following CDK12/13 inhibition in OS cells.
Article Snippet: Next, 143B cells were seeded onto 10 cm plates and co-transfected with 1 µg of
Techniques: Expressing, Control, RNA Sequencing, Transfection, Incubation, Binding Assay, Inhibition
Journal: bioRxiv
Article Title: CDK12/13 inhibition disrupts nucleolar morphology and promotes aberrant expression of IGS transcripts
doi: 10.1101/2025.03.01.640972
Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Schematic model of nucleolar structure (left). Immunofluorescence (IF) analysis of the indicated nucleolar marker expression in OS cells incubated with E9 (200 nM x 6 h). Scale bar, 5 μm. (B) IF analysis of H3K9me3 staining in OS cells treated as in (A). Scale bar, 10 μm, inset, 1 μm. (C) RNA-ISH analysis of 28S rRNA in OS cells treated as in (A). Scale bar, 10 μm. (D) RT-qPCR analysis of rRNA expression in OS cells treated with E9 as in A or BSJ-4-116 (500 mM x 6 h). GAPDH was used as loading control. Data represent mean ± standard deviation (S.D.) of 3 independent replicates. (E). RT-qPCR analysis of rRNA expression (right) at the regions corresponding to the schematic model of the rDNA tandem repetitive structure (left) in OS cells treated as in (D). Blue boxes represent the 47S rDNA region. H4 and H13 represent primers binding to 18S and 28S, respectively. ITS-1 (Intragenic Spacer 1); ITS-2 (Intragenic Spacer 2); 3’-ETS (3’-Externally Transcribed Spacer); IGS (intergenic spacer); Pol I TES (Pol I Transcription End Site). GAPDH was used as loading control. Data represent mean ± S.D. of 3 independent replicates. * P < 0.05, and *** P < 0.0001, one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test. (F) RT-qPCR analysis of rRNA expression in 143B CDK12 dTAG cells transfected with siControl and treated with DMSO or 1 µM dTAG13 (left), transfected with siControl or siCDK13 (middle), and transfected with siCDK13 and treated with DMSO or 1 µM dTAG13 (right). dTAG13 treatment and CDK13 knockdown were performed for 2 or 4 days. GAPDH was used as loading control. Data represent mean ± S.D. of 2 independent replicates. * P < 0.05, and ** P < 0.001, one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test.
Article Snippet: Next, 143B cells were seeded onto 10 cm plates and co-transfected with 1 µg of pCRIS-PITChv2-BSD R -dTAG-CDK12 and 2 µg of
Techniques: Immunofluorescence, Marker, Expressing, Incubation, Staining, Quantitative RT-PCR, Control, Standard Deviation, Binding Assay, Transfection, Knockdown
Journal: bioRxiv
Article Title: CDK12/13 inhibition disrupts nucleolar morphology and promotes aberrant expression of IGS transcripts
doi: 10.1101/2025.03.01.640972
Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) RT-qPCR analysis of 18S, 28S and IGS expression (at the regions indicated in the cartoon above) in OS cells treated with E9 (200 nM x 6 h). (B) RT-qPCR analysis of the indicated rRNAs in OS cells treated with E9 (200 nM) for the indicated times. Data represent mean ± S.D. of 2 independent replicates in A and B. (C) RT-qPCR analysis of 18S and H16 IGS region in OS cells incubated with BSJ-4-116 (500 nM x 6 h) or CR8 (600 nM x 6 h). Data represent mean ± S.D. of 3 independent replicates. GAPDH was used as loading control in all three assays. (D) Integrative Genomics Viewer (IGV) tracks of RNA expression in forward and reverse orientations from analysis of published RNA sequencing data sets of the indicated cell lines treated with CDK12/13 inhibitors at the following doses and durations: HEK293T: THZ531 (400 nM x 6 h); THP-1: THZ531 (200 nM x 6 h); KBM7: THZ531 (600 nM x 5 h); JURKAT: THZ531 (250 nM x 8 h); 143B: E9 (200 nM x 6 h); KELLY: 400 nM (THZ531 x 6 h). The y-axis scale indicates the range of normalized read coverage for each sample. Data set accession numbers are given in Supplemental Table 2. Dashed lines, H16 locus. (E) Northern blot analysis of RNA from OS cells treated with E9 (200 nM x 6 h) or NVP-2 (50 nM x 6 h). Equal loading across the samples is indicated by SYBR gold staining (left panels) of total RNA. The H16 transcripts were detected using radiolabeled probes targeting the forward ( P-Forward) or reverse ( P-Reverse) strands.
Article Snippet: Next, 143B cells were seeded onto 10 cm plates and co-transfected with 1 µg of pCRIS-PITChv2-BSD R -dTAG-CDK12 and 2 µg of
Techniques: Quantitative RT-PCR, Expressing, Incubation, Control, RNA Expression, RNA Sequencing, Northern Blot, Staining
Journal: bioRxiv
Article Title: CDK12/13 inhibition disrupts nucleolar morphology and promotes aberrant expression of IGS transcripts
doi: 10.1101/2025.03.01.640972
Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Heatmap showing the differential expression levels of RNA exosome and nuclear exosome co-factors in IMR32, Kelly, MG63.3, and 143B cells treated with THZ531 (500 nM x 6 h) or E9 (200 nM x 6 h) compared to DMSO treated control. Expression levels were obtained from public RNA-seq datasets GSE113314 and GSE132233 from the GEO database. Differential expression is represented as log2(fold change), with upregulation shown in red and downregulation in blue. (B) Violin plot showing the average gene length of core RNA exosome, NEXT, PAXT and TRAMP components. (C) IF analysis of poly(A) and 28S rRNA in OS cells transfected with siRNA against ZCCHC7 or TENT4A mRNA and incubated with E9 (200 nM x 6 h). Scale bar, 5 μm, inset, 1 μm. (D) IF analysis of the same markers as in (C) in OS cells treated with E9 (200 nM x 6 h) and/or RG-7834 (10 μM x 6 h). Scale bar, 5 μm, inset, 1 μm. (E) RIP-qPCR analysis of MTREX binding to 18S, 28S, H16 and H27 rRNAs in OS cells treated with E9 (200 nM x 6 h). Data represent mean ± S.D. of 2 independent replicates. RNA enrichment was calculated as (% of input of rRNA or IGS)/(% of input of GAPDH). (F) IF analysis of 28S rRNA and MTREX in OS cells treated as in (E). Scale bar, 5 μm. (G) RIP-qPCR analysis of EXOSC2 binding to 18S, 28S, H16 and H27 rRNAs in OS cells treated as in (E). Data represent mean ± S.D. of 2 independent replicates. RNA enrichment was calculated as in (E). (H) Schematic model for pAR rings accumulation following CDK12/13 inhibition in OS cells.
Article Snippet: Next, 143B cells were seeded onto 10 cm plates and co-transfected with 1 µg of pCRIS-PITChv2-BSD R -dTAG-CDK12 and 2 µg of
Techniques: Expressing, Control, RNA Sequencing, Transfection, Incubation, Binding Assay, Inhibition
Journal: bioRxiv
Article Title: CDK12/13 inhibition disrupts nucleolar morphology and promotes aberrant expression of IGS transcripts
doi: 10.1101/2025.03.01.640972
Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Schematic model of nucleolar structure (left). Immunofluorescence (IF) analysis of the indicated nucleolar marker expression in OS cells incubated with E9 (200 nM x 6 h). Scale bar, 5 μm. (B) IF analysis of H3K9me3 staining in OS cells treated as in (A). Scale bar, 10 μm, inset, 1 μm. (C) RNA-ISH analysis of 28S rRNA in OS cells treated as in (A). Scale bar, 10 μm. (D) RT-qPCR analysis of rRNA expression in OS cells treated with E9 as in A or BSJ-4-116 (500 mM x 6 h). GAPDH was used as loading control. Data represent mean ± standard deviation (S.D.) of 3 independent replicates. (E). RT-qPCR analysis of rRNA expression (right) at the regions corresponding to the schematic model of the rDNA tandem repetitive structure (left) in OS cells treated as in (D). Blue boxes represent the 47S rDNA region. H4 and H13 represent primers binding to 18S and 28S, respectively. ITS-1 (Intragenic Spacer 1); ITS-2 (Intragenic Spacer 2); 3’-ETS (3’-Externally Transcribed Spacer); IGS (intergenic spacer); Pol I TES (Pol I Transcription End Site). GAPDH was used as loading control. Data represent mean ± S.D. of 3 independent replicates. * P < 0.05, and *** P < 0.0001, one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test. (F) RT-qPCR analysis of rRNA expression in 143B CDK12 dTAG cells transfected with siControl and treated with DMSO or 1 µM dTAG13 (left), transfected with siControl or siCDK13 (middle), and transfected with siCDK13 and treated with DMSO or 1 µM dTAG13 (right). dTAG13 treatment and CDK13 knockdown were performed for 2 or 4 days. GAPDH was used as loading control. Data represent mean ± S.D. of 2 independent replicates. * P < 0.05, and ** P < 0.001, one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test.
Article Snippet: The BSD R -P2A-2xHA-FKBP12 F36V -linker cassette, generated with flanking sequences homologous to the
Techniques: Immunofluorescence, Marker, Expressing, Incubation, Staining, Quantitative RT-PCR, Control, Standard Deviation, Binding Assay, Transfection, Knockdown
Journal: bioRxiv
Article Title: CDK12/13 inhibition disrupts nucleolar morphology and promotes aberrant expression of IGS transcripts
doi: 10.1101/2025.03.01.640972
Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) RT-qPCR analysis of 18S, 28S and IGS expression (at the regions indicated in the cartoon above) in OS cells treated with E9 (200 nM x 6 h). (B) RT-qPCR analysis of the indicated rRNAs in OS cells treated with E9 (200 nM) for the indicated times. Data represent mean ± S.D. of 2 independent replicates in A and B. (C) RT-qPCR analysis of 18S and H16 IGS region in OS cells incubated with BSJ-4-116 (500 nM x 6 h) or CR8 (600 nM x 6 h). Data represent mean ± S.D. of 3 independent replicates. GAPDH was used as loading control in all three assays. (D) Integrative Genomics Viewer (IGV) tracks of RNA expression in forward and reverse orientations from analysis of published RNA sequencing data sets of the indicated cell lines treated with CDK12/13 inhibitors at the following doses and durations: HEK293T: THZ531 (400 nM x 6 h); THP-1: THZ531 (200 nM x 6 h); KBM7: THZ531 (600 nM x 5 h); JURKAT: THZ531 (250 nM x 8 h); 143B: E9 (200 nM x 6 h); KELLY: 400 nM (THZ531 x 6 h). The y-axis scale indicates the range of normalized read coverage for each sample. Data set accession numbers are given in Supplemental Table 2. Dashed lines, H16 locus. (E) Northern blot analysis of RNA from OS cells treated with E9 (200 nM x 6 h) or NVP-2 (50 nM x 6 h). Equal loading across the samples is indicated by SYBR gold staining (left panels) of total RNA. The H16 transcripts were detected using radiolabeled probes targeting the forward ( P-Forward) or reverse ( P-Reverse) strands.
Article Snippet: The BSD R -P2A-2xHA-FKBP12 F36V -linker cassette, generated with flanking sequences homologous to the
Techniques: Quantitative RT-PCR, Expressing, Incubation, Control, RNA Expression, RNA Sequencing, Northern Blot, Staining
Journal: bioRxiv
Article Title: CDK12/13 inhibition disrupts nucleolar morphology and promotes aberrant expression of IGS transcripts
doi: 10.1101/2025.03.01.640972
Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Heatmap showing the differential expression levels of RNA exosome and nuclear exosome co-factors in IMR32, Kelly, MG63.3, and 143B cells treated with THZ531 (500 nM x 6 h) or E9 (200 nM x 6 h) compared to DMSO treated control. Expression levels were obtained from public RNA-seq datasets GSE113314 and GSE132233 from the GEO database. Differential expression is represented as log2(fold change), with upregulation shown in red and downregulation in blue. (B) Violin plot showing the average gene length of core RNA exosome, NEXT, PAXT and TRAMP components. (C) IF analysis of poly(A) and 28S rRNA in OS cells transfected with siRNA against ZCCHC7 or TENT4A mRNA and incubated with E9 (200 nM x 6 h). Scale bar, 5 μm, inset, 1 μm. (D) IF analysis of the same markers as in (C) in OS cells treated with E9 (200 nM x 6 h) and/or RG-7834 (10 μM x 6 h). Scale bar, 5 μm, inset, 1 μm. (E) RIP-qPCR analysis of MTREX binding to 18S, 28S, H16 and H27 rRNAs in OS cells treated with E9 (200 nM x 6 h). Data represent mean ± S.D. of 2 independent replicates. RNA enrichment was calculated as (% of input of rRNA or IGS)/(% of input of GAPDH). (F) IF analysis of 28S rRNA and MTREX in OS cells treated as in (E). Scale bar, 5 μm. (G) RIP-qPCR analysis of EXOSC2 binding to 18S, 28S, H16 and H27 rRNAs in OS cells treated as in (E). Data represent mean ± S.D. of 2 independent replicates. RNA enrichment was calculated as in (E). (H) Schematic model for pAR rings accumulation following CDK12/13 inhibition in OS cells.
Article Snippet: The BSD R -P2A-2xHA-FKBP12 F36V -linker cassette, generated with flanking sequences homologous to the
Techniques: Expressing, Control, RNA Sequencing, Transfection, Incubation, Binding Assay, Inhibition