aedes albopictus c6 36 cells  (ATCC)


Bioz Verified Symbol ATCC is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol ATCC manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 86

    Structured Review

    ATCC aedes albopictus c6 36 cells
    The insect cells <t>C6/36</t> (a) or the porcine cell line PEDSV.15 (b) were infected with a MOI of 0.01 TCID 50 /cell with P0 (blue), P1 (green), P5 (purple) or P10 (red) in triplicates. Passage lines B and C were depicted separately. The presence of the virus was analysed by RT-qPCR, as well as by titration on C6/36 and PEDSV.15 cells. Statistical significance was determined using Tukey’s multiple comparison test (ANOVA) using either the P0 values as reference (*p<0.05, **p<0.01; ***p<0.001; ****p<0.0001) or following exclusion of P0 using the P1 values as reference ( a p<0.05, aa p<0.01; aaa p<0.001; aaaa p<0.0001). The same colour code as above was used to indicate the affiliated groups.
    Aedes Albopictus C6 36 Cells, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/aedes albopictus c6 36 cells/product/ATCC
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
    aedes albopictus c6 36 cells - by Bioz Stars, 2024-02
    86/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Fitness adaptations of Japanese encephalitis virus in pigs following vector-free serial passaging"

    Article Title: Fitness adaptations of Japanese encephalitis virus in pigs following vector-free serial passaging

    Journal: bioRxiv

    doi: 10.1101/2024.02.20.581151

    The insect cells C6/36 (a) or the porcine cell line PEDSV.15 (b) were infected with a MOI of 0.01 TCID 50 /cell with P0 (blue), P1 (green), P5 (purple) or P10 (red) in triplicates. Passage lines B and C were depicted separately. The presence of the virus was analysed by RT-qPCR, as well as by titration on C6/36 and PEDSV.15 cells. Statistical significance was determined using Tukey’s multiple comparison test (ANOVA) using either the P0 values as reference (*p<0.05, **p<0.01; ***p<0.001; ****p<0.0001) or following exclusion of P0 using the P1 values as reference ( a p<0.05, aa p<0.01; aaa p<0.001; aaaa p<0.0001). The same colour code as above was used to indicate the affiliated groups.
    Figure Legend Snippet: The insect cells C6/36 (a) or the porcine cell line PEDSV.15 (b) were infected with a MOI of 0.01 TCID 50 /cell with P0 (blue), P1 (green), P5 (purple) or P10 (red) in triplicates. Passage lines B and C were depicted separately. The presence of the virus was analysed by RT-qPCR, as well as by titration on C6/36 and PEDSV.15 cells. Statistical significance was determined using Tukey’s multiple comparison test (ANOVA) using either the P0 values as reference (*p<0.05, **p<0.01; ***p<0.001; ****p<0.0001) or following exclusion of P0 using the P1 values as reference ( a p<0.05, aa p<0.01; aaa p<0.001; aaaa p<0.0001). The same colour code as above was used to indicate the affiliated groups.

    Techniques Used: Infection, Virus, Quantitative RT-PCR, Titration, Comparison

    aedes albopictus c6 36 cells  (ATCC)


    Bioz Verified Symbol ATCC is a verified supplier
    Bioz Manufacturer Symbol ATCC manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 86

    Structured Review

    ATCC aedes albopictus c6 36 cells
    Aedes Albopictus C6 36 Cells, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/aedes albopictus c6 36 cells/product/ATCC
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
    aedes albopictus c6 36 cells - by Bioz Stars, 2024-02
    86/100 stars

    Images

    c6 36 cells  (ATCC)


    Bioz Verified Symbol ATCC is a verified supplier
    Bioz Manufacturer Symbol ATCC manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 86

    Structured Review

    ATCC c6 36 cells
    C6 36 Cells, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/c6 36 cells/product/ATCC
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
    c6 36 cells - by Bioz Stars, 2024-02
    86/100 stars

    Images

    mosquito larva c6 36 cells  (ATCC)


    Bioz Verified Symbol ATCC is a verified supplier
    Bioz Manufacturer Symbol ATCC manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 86

    Structured Review

    ATCC mosquito larva c6 36 cells
    Mosquito Larva C6 36 Cells, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/mosquito larva c6 36 cells/product/ATCC
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
    mosquito larva c6 36 cells - by Bioz Stars, 2024-02
    86/100 stars

    Images

    c6 36 ht mosquito cell line  (ATCC)


    Bioz Verified Symbol ATCC is a verified supplier
    Bioz Manufacturer Symbol ATCC manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 86

    Structured Review

    ATCC c6 36 ht mosquito cell line
    C6 36 Ht Mosquito Cell Line, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/c6 36 ht mosquito cell line/product/ATCC
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
    c6 36 ht mosquito cell line - by Bioz Stars, 2024-02
    86/100 stars

    Images

    albopictus c6 36 cells  (ATCC)


    Bioz Verified Symbol ATCC is a verified supplier
    Bioz Manufacturer Symbol ATCC manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 86

    Structured Review

    ATCC albopictus c6 36 cells
    Albopictus C6 36 Cells, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/albopictus c6 36 cells/product/ATCC
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
    albopictus c6 36 cells - by Bioz Stars, 2024-02
    86/100 stars

    Images

    c6 36 cells  (ATCC)


    Bioz Verified Symbol ATCC is a verified supplier
    Bioz Manufacturer Symbol ATCC manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 86

    Structured Review

    ATCC c6 36 cells
    C6 36 Cells, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/c6 36 cells/product/ATCC
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
    c6 36 cells - by Bioz Stars, 2024-02
    86/100 stars

    Images

    c6 36 cell lines  (ATCC)


    Bioz Verified Symbol ATCC is a verified supplier
    Bioz Manufacturer Symbol ATCC manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 86

    Structured Review

    ATCC c6 36 cell lines
    C6 36 Cell Lines, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/c6 36 cell lines/product/ATCC
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
    c6 36 cell lines - by Bioz Stars, 2024-02
    86/100 stars

    Images

    c6 36 cell lines  (ATCC)


    Bioz Verified Symbol ATCC is a verified supplier
    Bioz Manufacturer Symbol ATCC manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 86

    Structured Review

    ATCC c6 36 cell lines
    C6 36 Cell Lines, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/c6 36 cell lines/product/ATCC
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
    c6 36 cell lines - by Bioz Stars, 2024-02
    86/100 stars

    Images

    aedes albopictus c6 36 cell  (ATCC)


    Bioz Verified Symbol ATCC is a verified supplier
    Bioz Manufacturer Symbol ATCC manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 86

    Structured Review

    ATCC aedes albopictus c6 36 cell
    Data sets and computational tools used for mapping SINV RNA modifications. ( A ) Read-level data features of full-length viral reads base called using the Dorado model. Baby hamster kidney BHK-21 and Aedes albopictus <t>C6/36</t> cells were infected with SINV at a multiplicity of infection of 0.1, followed by polyadenylated RNA isolation and ONT DRS. IVT RNA was synthesized from a plasmid encoding the SINV cDNA. Full-length viral reads were extracted from the alignment files. Read-level accuracy, identity, mismatch, insertion, and deletion were calculated using a custom Python script. ( B ) Base-level data features of full-length viral reads base called using the Dorado model. The confusion matrixes show the frequencies of each base being correctly base called, miscalled, or deleted in individual samples. ( C ) Classification of modification analysis tools used in the present study.
    Aedes Albopictus C6 36 Cell, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/aedes albopictus c6 36 cell/product/ATCC
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
    aedes albopictus c6 36 cell - by Bioz Stars, 2024-02
    86/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Utilization of nanopore direct RNA sequencing to analyze viral RNA modifications"

    Article Title: Utilization of nanopore direct RNA sequencing to analyze viral RNA modifications

    Journal: mSystems

    doi: 10.1128/msystems.01163-23

    Data sets and computational tools used for mapping SINV RNA modifications. ( A ) Read-level data features of full-length viral reads base called using the Dorado model. Baby hamster kidney BHK-21 and Aedes albopictus C6/36 cells were infected with SINV at a multiplicity of infection of 0.1, followed by polyadenylated RNA isolation and ONT DRS. IVT RNA was synthesized from a plasmid encoding the SINV cDNA. Full-length viral reads were extracted from the alignment files. Read-level accuracy, identity, mismatch, insertion, and deletion were calculated using a custom Python script. ( B ) Base-level data features of full-length viral reads base called using the Dorado model. The confusion matrixes show the frequencies of each base being correctly base called, miscalled, or deleted in individual samples. ( C ) Classification of modification analysis tools used in the present study.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Data sets and computational tools used for mapping SINV RNA modifications. ( A ) Read-level data features of full-length viral reads base called using the Dorado model. Baby hamster kidney BHK-21 and Aedes albopictus C6/36 cells were infected with SINV at a multiplicity of infection of 0.1, followed by polyadenylated RNA isolation and ONT DRS. IVT RNA was synthesized from a plasmid encoding the SINV cDNA. Full-length viral reads were extracted from the alignment files. Read-level accuracy, identity, mismatch, insertion, and deletion were calculated using a custom Python script. ( B ) Base-level data features of full-length viral reads base called using the Dorado model. The confusion matrixes show the frequencies of each base being correctly base called, miscalled, or deleted in individual samples. ( C ) Classification of modification analysis tools used in the present study.

    Techniques Used: Infection, Isolation, Synthesized, Plasmid Preparation, Modification

    Evaluation of 10 computational tools in detecting vRNA modifications with default or recommended parameters. ( A ) Correlations between probability values computed for the IVT and BHK-21 samples at each testable site using single-mode methods. ( B ) Correlations between probability values computed for the IVT and C6/36 samples. For panels A and B , equal numbers of reads were subsampled from individual data sets, followed by analyses using m6Anet, Nanom6A, and Tombo_de novo; all predictable A sites are included. ( C ) Workflow of identifying false-positive predictions resulting from comparative approaches. Briefly, full-length IVT reads were divided into two subsets and used as input data sets for comparison method analyses. The default or recommended cutoffs were applied, and the final predictions were regarded as false positives. ( D ) Volcano-like plot for output from error rate-based comparative method Differr. ( E ) Volcano-like plots for outputs from current signal-based comparative methods Tombo_com and Xpore. For panels D and E , dashed lines indicate recommended cutoff values; false-positive predictions are labeled in red; all types of modifications are included. FPR, false-positive rate. ( F ) Comparative tools with a FPR lower than 0.05%.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Evaluation of 10 computational tools in detecting vRNA modifications with default or recommended parameters. ( A ) Correlations between probability values computed for the IVT and BHK-21 samples at each testable site using single-mode methods. ( B ) Correlations between probability values computed for the IVT and C6/36 samples. For panels A and B , equal numbers of reads were subsampled from individual data sets, followed by analyses using m6Anet, Nanom6A, and Tombo_de novo; all predictable A sites are included. ( C ) Workflow of identifying false-positive predictions resulting from comparative approaches. Briefly, full-length IVT reads were divided into two subsets and used as input data sets for comparison method analyses. The default or recommended cutoffs were applied, and the final predictions were regarded as false positives. ( D ) Volcano-like plot for output from error rate-based comparative method Differr. ( E ) Volcano-like plots for outputs from current signal-based comparative methods Tombo_com and Xpore. For panels D and E , dashed lines indicate recommended cutoff values; false-positive predictions are labeled in red; all types of modifications are included. FPR, false-positive rate. ( F ) Comparative tools with a FPR lower than 0.05%.

    Techniques Used: Comparison, Labeling

    Integrated analysis of comparative methods. An equal number of reads, 772 in amount, were randomly subsampled from the BHK-21, C6/36, and IVT samples, followed by analyses using comparative methods. (A and B) UpSet plots for modification sites reported by different comparative methods in the BHK-21 or C6/36 samples. Red asterisks indicate significantly enriched intersections from the background. (C and D) Veen diagrams showing the intersections of Tombo_com and xPore predictions. The P -values were calculated by Fisher’s exact test. (E and F) Boxplots showing normalized signal differences at predicted modification sites and adjacent regions. The plots were generated using Tombo. Predicted sites are indicated by black arrows.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Integrated analysis of comparative methods. An equal number of reads, 772 in amount, were randomly subsampled from the BHK-21, C6/36, and IVT samples, followed by analyses using comparative methods. (A and B) UpSet plots for modification sites reported by different comparative methods in the BHK-21 or C6/36 samples. Red asterisks indicate significantly enriched intersections from the background. (C and D) Veen diagrams showing the intersections of Tombo_com and xPore predictions. The P -values were calculated by Fisher’s exact test. (E and F) Boxplots showing normalized signal differences at predicted modification sites and adjacent regions. The plots were generated using Tombo. Predicted sites are indicated by black arrows.

    Techniques Used: Modification, Generated

    Predictions of modification sites in the gRNAs and sgRNAs. As many reads as possible were subsampled from the original sequencing data while maintaining balanced coverage depths for the input dataset pairs, followed by analysis using the Tombo_com and xPore pipeline. (A) Intersections of modification sites in the SINV gRNAs generated in BHK-21 and C6/36 cells. (B) Positions of predicted modification sites in the SINV gRNAs. Read coverage depths of individual analyses are indicated in parentheses. (C) Intersections of modification sites in the SINV sgRNAs, generated in BHK-21 and C6/36 cells. (D) Positions of modification sites in the SINV sgRNAs.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Predictions of modification sites in the gRNAs and sgRNAs. As many reads as possible were subsampled from the original sequencing data while maintaining balanced coverage depths for the input dataset pairs, followed by analysis using the Tombo_com and xPore pipeline. (A) Intersections of modification sites in the SINV gRNAs generated in BHK-21 and C6/36 cells. (B) Positions of predicted modification sites in the SINV gRNAs. Read coverage depths of individual analyses are indicated in parentheses. (C) Intersections of modification sites in the SINV sgRNAs, generated in BHK-21 and C6/36 cells. (D) Positions of modification sites in the SINV sgRNAs.

    Techniques Used: Modification, Sequencing, Generated

    Similar Products

  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 86
    ATCC aedes albopictus c6 36 cells
    The insect cells <t>C6/36</t> (a) or the porcine cell line PEDSV.15 (b) were infected with a MOI of 0.01 TCID 50 /cell with P0 (blue), P1 (green), P5 (purple) or P10 (red) in triplicates. Passage lines B and C were depicted separately. The presence of the virus was analysed by RT-qPCR, as well as by titration on C6/36 and PEDSV.15 cells. Statistical significance was determined using Tukey’s multiple comparison test (ANOVA) using either the P0 values as reference (*p<0.05, **p<0.01; ***p<0.001; ****p<0.0001) or following exclusion of P0 using the P1 values as reference ( a p<0.05, aa p<0.01; aaa p<0.001; aaaa p<0.0001). The same colour code as above was used to indicate the affiliated groups.
    Aedes Albopictus C6 36 Cells, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/aedes albopictus c6 36 cells/product/ATCC
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
    aedes albopictus c6 36 cells - by Bioz Stars, 2024-02
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    ATCC c6 36 cells
    The insect cells <t>C6/36</t> (a) or the porcine cell line PEDSV.15 (b) were infected with a MOI of 0.01 TCID 50 /cell with P0 (blue), P1 (green), P5 (purple) or P10 (red) in triplicates. Passage lines B and C were depicted separately. The presence of the virus was analysed by RT-qPCR, as well as by titration on C6/36 and PEDSV.15 cells. Statistical significance was determined using Tukey’s multiple comparison test (ANOVA) using either the P0 values as reference (*p<0.05, **p<0.01; ***p<0.001; ****p<0.0001) or following exclusion of P0 using the P1 values as reference ( a p<0.05, aa p<0.01; aaa p<0.001; aaaa p<0.0001). The same colour code as above was used to indicate the affiliated groups.
    C6 36 Cells, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/c6 36 cells/product/ATCC
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
    c6 36 cells - by Bioz Stars, 2024-02
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    ATCC mosquito larva c6 36 cells
    The insect cells <t>C6/36</t> (a) or the porcine cell line PEDSV.15 (b) were infected with a MOI of 0.01 TCID 50 /cell with P0 (blue), P1 (green), P5 (purple) or P10 (red) in triplicates. Passage lines B and C were depicted separately. The presence of the virus was analysed by RT-qPCR, as well as by titration on C6/36 and PEDSV.15 cells. Statistical significance was determined using Tukey’s multiple comparison test (ANOVA) using either the P0 values as reference (*p<0.05, **p<0.01; ***p<0.001; ****p<0.0001) or following exclusion of P0 using the P1 values as reference ( a p<0.05, aa p<0.01; aaa p<0.001; aaaa p<0.0001). The same colour code as above was used to indicate the affiliated groups.
    Mosquito Larva C6 36 Cells, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/mosquito larva c6 36 cells/product/ATCC
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
    mosquito larva c6 36 cells - by Bioz Stars, 2024-02
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    ATCC c6 36 ht mosquito cell line
    The insect cells <t>C6/36</t> (a) or the porcine cell line PEDSV.15 (b) were infected with a MOI of 0.01 TCID 50 /cell with P0 (blue), P1 (green), P5 (purple) or P10 (red) in triplicates. Passage lines B and C were depicted separately. The presence of the virus was analysed by RT-qPCR, as well as by titration on C6/36 and PEDSV.15 cells. Statistical significance was determined using Tukey’s multiple comparison test (ANOVA) using either the P0 values as reference (*p<0.05, **p<0.01; ***p<0.001; ****p<0.0001) or following exclusion of P0 using the P1 values as reference ( a p<0.05, aa p<0.01; aaa p<0.001; aaaa p<0.0001). The same colour code as above was used to indicate the affiliated groups.
    C6 36 Ht Mosquito Cell Line, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/c6 36 ht mosquito cell line/product/ATCC
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
    c6 36 ht mosquito cell line - by Bioz Stars, 2024-02
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    ATCC albopictus c6 36 cells
    The insect cells <t>C6/36</t> (a) or the porcine cell line PEDSV.15 (b) were infected with a MOI of 0.01 TCID 50 /cell with P0 (blue), P1 (green), P5 (purple) or P10 (red) in triplicates. Passage lines B and C were depicted separately. The presence of the virus was analysed by RT-qPCR, as well as by titration on C6/36 and PEDSV.15 cells. Statistical significance was determined using Tukey’s multiple comparison test (ANOVA) using either the P0 values as reference (*p<0.05, **p<0.01; ***p<0.001; ****p<0.0001) or following exclusion of P0 using the P1 values as reference ( a p<0.05, aa p<0.01; aaa p<0.001; aaaa p<0.0001). The same colour code as above was used to indicate the affiliated groups.
    Albopictus C6 36 Cells, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/albopictus c6 36 cells/product/ATCC
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
    albopictus c6 36 cells - by Bioz Stars, 2024-02
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    ATCC c6 36 cell lines
    The insect cells <t>C6/36</t> (a) or the porcine cell line PEDSV.15 (b) were infected with a MOI of 0.01 TCID 50 /cell with P0 (blue), P1 (green), P5 (purple) or P10 (red) in triplicates. Passage lines B and C were depicted separately. The presence of the virus was analysed by RT-qPCR, as well as by titration on C6/36 and PEDSV.15 cells. Statistical significance was determined using Tukey’s multiple comparison test (ANOVA) using either the P0 values as reference (*p<0.05, **p<0.01; ***p<0.001; ****p<0.0001) or following exclusion of P0 using the P1 values as reference ( a p<0.05, aa p<0.01; aaa p<0.001; aaaa p<0.0001). The same colour code as above was used to indicate the affiliated groups.
    C6 36 Cell Lines, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/c6 36 cell lines/product/ATCC
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
    c6 36 cell lines - by Bioz Stars, 2024-02
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    ATCC aedes albopictus c6 36 cell
    Data sets and computational tools used for mapping SINV RNA modifications. ( A ) Read-level data features of full-length viral reads base called using the Dorado model. Baby hamster kidney BHK-21 and Aedes albopictus <t>C6/36</t> cells were infected with SINV at a multiplicity of infection of 0.1, followed by polyadenylated RNA isolation and ONT DRS. IVT RNA was synthesized from a plasmid encoding the SINV cDNA. Full-length viral reads were extracted from the alignment files. Read-level accuracy, identity, mismatch, insertion, and deletion were calculated using a custom Python script. ( B ) Base-level data features of full-length viral reads base called using the Dorado model. The confusion matrixes show the frequencies of each base being correctly base called, miscalled, or deleted in individual samples. ( C ) Classification of modification analysis tools used in the present study.
    Aedes Albopictus C6 36 Cell, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/aedes albopictus c6 36 cell/product/ATCC
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
    aedes albopictus c6 36 cell - by Bioz Stars, 2024-02
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    The insect cells C6/36 (a) or the porcine cell line PEDSV.15 (b) were infected with a MOI of 0.01 TCID 50 /cell with P0 (blue), P1 (green), P5 (purple) or P10 (red) in triplicates. Passage lines B and C were depicted separately. The presence of the virus was analysed by RT-qPCR, as well as by titration on C6/36 and PEDSV.15 cells. Statistical significance was determined using Tukey’s multiple comparison test (ANOVA) using either the P0 values as reference (*p<0.05, **p<0.01; ***p<0.001; ****p<0.0001) or following exclusion of P0 using the P1 values as reference ( a p<0.05, aa p<0.01; aaa p<0.001; aaaa p<0.0001). The same colour code as above was used to indicate the affiliated groups.

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: Fitness adaptations of Japanese encephalitis virus in pigs following vector-free serial passaging

    doi: 10.1101/2024.02.20.581151

    Figure Lengend Snippet: The insect cells C6/36 (a) or the porcine cell line PEDSV.15 (b) were infected with a MOI of 0.01 TCID 50 /cell with P0 (blue), P1 (green), P5 (purple) or P10 (red) in triplicates. Passage lines B and C were depicted separately. The presence of the virus was analysed by RT-qPCR, as well as by titration on C6/36 and PEDSV.15 cells. Statistical significance was determined using Tukey’s multiple comparison test (ANOVA) using either the P0 values as reference (*p<0.05, **p<0.01; ***p<0.001; ****p<0.0001) or following exclusion of P0 using the P1 values as reference ( a p<0.05, aa p<0.01; aaa p<0.001; aaaa p<0.0001). The same colour code as above was used to indicate the affiliated groups.

    Article Snippet: Aedes albopictus C6/36 cells (ATCC) were cultured at 28°C and 5% CO 2.

    Techniques: Infection, Virus, Quantitative RT-PCR, Titration, Comparison

    Data sets and computational tools used for mapping SINV RNA modifications. ( A ) Read-level data features of full-length viral reads base called using the Dorado model. Baby hamster kidney BHK-21 and Aedes albopictus C6/36 cells were infected with SINV at a multiplicity of infection of 0.1, followed by polyadenylated RNA isolation and ONT DRS. IVT RNA was synthesized from a plasmid encoding the SINV cDNA. Full-length viral reads were extracted from the alignment files. Read-level accuracy, identity, mismatch, insertion, and deletion were calculated using a custom Python script. ( B ) Base-level data features of full-length viral reads base called using the Dorado model. The confusion matrixes show the frequencies of each base being correctly base called, miscalled, or deleted in individual samples. ( C ) Classification of modification analysis tools used in the present study.

    Journal: mSystems

    Article Title: Utilization of nanopore direct RNA sequencing to analyze viral RNA modifications

    doi: 10.1128/msystems.01163-23

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Data sets and computational tools used for mapping SINV RNA modifications. ( A ) Read-level data features of full-length viral reads base called using the Dorado model. Baby hamster kidney BHK-21 and Aedes albopictus C6/36 cells were infected with SINV at a multiplicity of infection of 0.1, followed by polyadenylated RNA isolation and ONT DRS. IVT RNA was synthesized from a plasmid encoding the SINV cDNA. Full-length viral reads were extracted from the alignment files. Read-level accuracy, identity, mismatch, insertion, and deletion were calculated using a custom Python script. ( B ) Base-level data features of full-length viral reads base called using the Dorado model. The confusion matrixes show the frequencies of each base being correctly base called, miscalled, or deleted in individual samples. ( C ) Classification of modification analysis tools used in the present study.

    Article Snippet: Aedes albopictus C6/36 cell and baby hamster kidney BHK-21 cell were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA, USA.

    Techniques: Infection, Isolation, Synthesized, Plasmid Preparation, Modification

    Evaluation of 10 computational tools in detecting vRNA modifications with default or recommended parameters. ( A ) Correlations between probability values computed for the IVT and BHK-21 samples at each testable site using single-mode methods. ( B ) Correlations between probability values computed for the IVT and C6/36 samples. For panels A and B , equal numbers of reads were subsampled from individual data sets, followed by analyses using m6Anet, Nanom6A, and Tombo_de novo; all predictable A sites are included. ( C ) Workflow of identifying false-positive predictions resulting from comparative approaches. Briefly, full-length IVT reads were divided into two subsets and used as input data sets for comparison method analyses. The default or recommended cutoffs were applied, and the final predictions were regarded as false positives. ( D ) Volcano-like plot for output from error rate-based comparative method Differr. ( E ) Volcano-like plots for outputs from current signal-based comparative methods Tombo_com and Xpore. For panels D and E , dashed lines indicate recommended cutoff values; false-positive predictions are labeled in red; all types of modifications are included. FPR, false-positive rate. ( F ) Comparative tools with a FPR lower than 0.05%.

    Journal: mSystems

    Article Title: Utilization of nanopore direct RNA sequencing to analyze viral RNA modifications

    doi: 10.1128/msystems.01163-23

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Evaluation of 10 computational tools in detecting vRNA modifications with default or recommended parameters. ( A ) Correlations between probability values computed for the IVT and BHK-21 samples at each testable site using single-mode methods. ( B ) Correlations between probability values computed for the IVT and C6/36 samples. For panels A and B , equal numbers of reads were subsampled from individual data sets, followed by analyses using m6Anet, Nanom6A, and Tombo_de novo; all predictable A sites are included. ( C ) Workflow of identifying false-positive predictions resulting from comparative approaches. Briefly, full-length IVT reads were divided into two subsets and used as input data sets for comparison method analyses. The default or recommended cutoffs were applied, and the final predictions were regarded as false positives. ( D ) Volcano-like plot for output from error rate-based comparative method Differr. ( E ) Volcano-like plots for outputs from current signal-based comparative methods Tombo_com and Xpore. For panels D and E , dashed lines indicate recommended cutoff values; false-positive predictions are labeled in red; all types of modifications are included. FPR, false-positive rate. ( F ) Comparative tools with a FPR lower than 0.05%.

    Article Snippet: Aedes albopictus C6/36 cell and baby hamster kidney BHK-21 cell were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA, USA.

    Techniques: Comparison, Labeling

    Integrated analysis of comparative methods. An equal number of reads, 772 in amount, were randomly subsampled from the BHK-21, C6/36, and IVT samples, followed by analyses using comparative methods. (A and B) UpSet plots for modification sites reported by different comparative methods in the BHK-21 or C6/36 samples. Red asterisks indicate significantly enriched intersections from the background. (C and D) Veen diagrams showing the intersections of Tombo_com and xPore predictions. The P -values were calculated by Fisher’s exact test. (E and F) Boxplots showing normalized signal differences at predicted modification sites and adjacent regions. The plots were generated using Tombo. Predicted sites are indicated by black arrows.

    Journal: mSystems

    Article Title: Utilization of nanopore direct RNA sequencing to analyze viral RNA modifications

    doi: 10.1128/msystems.01163-23

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Integrated analysis of comparative methods. An equal number of reads, 772 in amount, were randomly subsampled from the BHK-21, C6/36, and IVT samples, followed by analyses using comparative methods. (A and B) UpSet plots for modification sites reported by different comparative methods in the BHK-21 or C6/36 samples. Red asterisks indicate significantly enriched intersections from the background. (C and D) Veen diagrams showing the intersections of Tombo_com and xPore predictions. The P -values were calculated by Fisher’s exact test. (E and F) Boxplots showing normalized signal differences at predicted modification sites and adjacent regions. The plots were generated using Tombo. Predicted sites are indicated by black arrows.

    Article Snippet: Aedes albopictus C6/36 cell and baby hamster kidney BHK-21 cell were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA, USA.

    Techniques: Modification, Generated

    Predictions of modification sites in the gRNAs and sgRNAs. As many reads as possible were subsampled from the original sequencing data while maintaining balanced coverage depths for the input dataset pairs, followed by analysis using the Tombo_com and xPore pipeline. (A) Intersections of modification sites in the SINV gRNAs generated in BHK-21 and C6/36 cells. (B) Positions of predicted modification sites in the SINV gRNAs. Read coverage depths of individual analyses are indicated in parentheses. (C) Intersections of modification sites in the SINV sgRNAs, generated in BHK-21 and C6/36 cells. (D) Positions of modification sites in the SINV sgRNAs.

    Journal: mSystems

    Article Title: Utilization of nanopore direct RNA sequencing to analyze viral RNA modifications

    doi: 10.1128/msystems.01163-23

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Predictions of modification sites in the gRNAs and sgRNAs. As many reads as possible were subsampled from the original sequencing data while maintaining balanced coverage depths for the input dataset pairs, followed by analysis using the Tombo_com and xPore pipeline. (A) Intersections of modification sites in the SINV gRNAs generated in BHK-21 and C6/36 cells. (B) Positions of predicted modification sites in the SINV gRNAs. Read coverage depths of individual analyses are indicated in parentheses. (C) Intersections of modification sites in the SINV sgRNAs, generated in BHK-21 and C6/36 cells. (D) Positions of modification sites in the SINV sgRNAs.

    Article Snippet: Aedes albopictus C6/36 cell and baby hamster kidney BHK-21 cell were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA, USA.

    Techniques: Modification, Sequencing, Generated