Review





Similar Products

86
Millipore bap
Bap, supplied by Millipore, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/bap/product/Millipore
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
bap - by Bioz Stars, 2024-12
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Merck & Co bap
Bap, supplied by Merck & Co, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/bap/product/Merck & Co
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
bap - by Bioz Stars, 2024-12
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Macklin Inc 3 4 benzopyrene bap
3 4 Benzopyrene Bap, supplied by Macklin Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/3 4 benzopyrene bap/product/Macklin Inc
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
3 4 benzopyrene bap - by Bioz Stars, 2024-12
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Diacron Labs biological antioxidant potential bap
Change in <t>BAP</t> (plasma <t>antioxidant</t> capacity) values from baseline at T1 and T2 in the Spirulina and placebo groups. The dashed line shows the threshold above which BAP values are considered optimal. * indicates p ≤ 0.05.
Biological Antioxidant Potential Bap, supplied by Diacron Labs, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/biological antioxidant potential bap/product/Diacron Labs
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
biological antioxidant potential bap - by Bioz Stars, 2024-12
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Immunodiagnostic Systems bap
Real-world data on GDPP in CRPC patients with BM. ( A ) A comparison of <t>GDPP,</t> <t>PSA,</t> TRACP 5b, <t>BAP,</t> mGDF15, PINP, OC, ALP, and LDH levels in healthy donors ( n = 30) versus CRPC patients with and without BM ( n = 80 and 75, respectively). The data show significantly elevated levels of GDPP, PSA, BAP, mGDF15 and LDH in patients with BM. GDPP: Growth differentiation factor 15 propeptide, Data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD), and statistical analyses were performed using the Tukey‒Kramer method (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01; n.s., not significant). ( B ) GDPP had the best AUC when comparing the diagnostic performance of each blood biomarker for BM in CRPC patients in each of the two randomized cohorts. ( C ) Comparison of blood GDPP levels by site of metastasis in PC (Local only: n = 60, Lymph node metastatic CRPC only: n = 12, Bone metastatic CRPC only: n = 31). ( D ) The analysis of the relationship between the BSI and GDPP, PSA, TRACP 5b, BAP, mGDF15, PINP, OC, ALP, or LDH in CRPC patients with BM is shown, together with the comparison of the strength of the correlation between each biomarker and the BSI ( n = 80). Statistical analyses were performed using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. ( E ) The relationships between the change in BSI (ΔBSI) and the changes in many blood biomarkers during systemic treatment in CRPC patients with BM showed that the change in GDPP (ΔGDPP) correlated best with the change in the BSI ( n = 22). Statistical analyses were performed using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. ( F ) This panel shows data from a representative patient who underwent longitudinal monitoring. During the clinical course of the patients, the plasma GDPP levels, rather than PSA levels, reflected the volume of BM revealed by PSMA PET. Red arrow indicates the solitary BM location from PCa. ( G ) Kaplan‒Meier analysis of the OS of CRPC patients with BM stratified by GDPP value; statistical analyses were performed using the log-rank test (** p < 0.01)
Bap, supplied by Immunodiagnostic Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/bap/product/Immunodiagnostic Systems
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
bap - by Bioz Stars, 2024-12
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
GraphPad Software Inc baps 4
Real-world data on GDPP in CRPC patients with BM. ( A ) A comparison of <t>GDPP,</t> <t>PSA,</t> TRACP 5b, <t>BAP,</t> mGDF15, PINP, OC, ALP, and LDH levels in healthy donors ( n = 30) versus CRPC patients with and without BM ( n = 80 and 75, respectively). The data show significantly elevated levels of GDPP, PSA, BAP, mGDF15 and LDH in patients with BM. GDPP: Growth differentiation factor 15 propeptide, Data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD), and statistical analyses were performed using the Tukey‒Kramer method (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01; n.s., not significant). ( B ) GDPP had the best AUC when comparing the diagnostic performance of each blood biomarker for BM in CRPC patients in each of the two randomized cohorts. ( C ) Comparison of blood GDPP levels by site of metastasis in PC (Local only: n = 60, Lymph node metastatic CRPC only: n = 12, Bone metastatic CRPC only: n = 31). ( D ) The analysis of the relationship between the BSI and GDPP, PSA, TRACP 5b, BAP, mGDF15, PINP, OC, ALP, or LDH in CRPC patients with BM is shown, together with the comparison of the strength of the correlation between each biomarker and the BSI ( n = 80). Statistical analyses were performed using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. ( E ) The relationships between the change in BSI (ΔBSI) and the changes in many blood biomarkers during systemic treatment in CRPC patients with BM showed that the change in GDPP (ΔGDPP) correlated best with the change in the BSI ( n = 22). Statistical analyses were performed using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. ( F ) This panel shows data from a representative patient who underwent longitudinal monitoring. During the clinical course of the patients, the plasma GDPP levels, rather than PSA levels, reflected the volume of BM revealed by PSMA PET. Red arrow indicates the solitary BM location from PCa. ( G ) Kaplan‒Meier analysis of the OS of CRPC patients with BM stratified by GDPP value; statistical analyses were performed using the log-rank test (** p < 0.01)
Baps 4, supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/baps 4/product/GraphPad Software Inc
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
baps 4 - by Bioz Stars, 2024-12
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
GraphPad Software Inc baps 3
Real-world data on GDPP in CRPC patients with BM. ( A ) A comparison of <t>GDPP,</t> <t>PSA,</t> TRACP 5b, <t>BAP,</t> mGDF15, PINP, OC, ALP, and LDH levels in healthy donors ( n = 30) versus CRPC patients with and without BM ( n = 80 and 75, respectively). The data show significantly elevated levels of GDPP, PSA, BAP, mGDF15 and LDH in patients with BM. GDPP: Growth differentiation factor 15 propeptide, Data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD), and statistical analyses were performed using the Tukey‒Kramer method (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01; n.s., not significant). ( B ) GDPP had the best AUC when comparing the diagnostic performance of each blood biomarker for BM in CRPC patients in each of the two randomized cohorts. ( C ) Comparison of blood GDPP levels by site of metastasis in PC (Local only: n = 60, Lymph node metastatic CRPC only: n = 12, Bone metastatic CRPC only: n = 31). ( D ) The analysis of the relationship between the BSI and GDPP, PSA, TRACP 5b, BAP, mGDF15, PINP, OC, ALP, or LDH in CRPC patients with BM is shown, together with the comparison of the strength of the correlation between each biomarker and the BSI ( n = 80). Statistical analyses were performed using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. ( E ) The relationships between the change in BSI (ΔBSI) and the changes in many blood biomarkers during systemic treatment in CRPC patients with BM showed that the change in GDPP (ΔGDPP) correlated best with the change in the BSI ( n = 22). Statistical analyses were performed using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. ( F ) This panel shows data from a representative patient who underwent longitudinal monitoring. During the clinical course of the patients, the plasma GDPP levels, rather than PSA levels, reflected the volume of BM revealed by PSMA PET. Red arrow indicates the solitary BM location from PCa. ( G ) Kaplan‒Meier analysis of the OS of CRPC patients with BM stratified by GDPP value; statistical analyses were performed using the log-rank test (** p < 0.01)
Baps 3, supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/baps 3/product/GraphPad Software Inc
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
baps 3 - by Bioz Stars, 2024-12
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

bap  (ATCC)
86
ATCC bap
Real-world data on GDPP in CRPC patients with BM. ( A ) A comparison of <t>GDPP,</t> <t>PSA,</t> TRACP 5b, <t>BAP,</t> mGDF15, PINP, OC, ALP, and LDH levels in healthy donors ( n = 30) versus CRPC patients with and without BM ( n = 80 and 75, respectively). The data show significantly elevated levels of GDPP, PSA, BAP, mGDF15 and LDH in patients with BM. GDPP: Growth differentiation factor 15 propeptide, Data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD), and statistical analyses were performed using the Tukey‒Kramer method (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01; n.s., not significant). ( B ) GDPP had the best AUC when comparing the diagnostic performance of each blood biomarker for BM in CRPC patients in each of the two randomized cohorts. ( C ) Comparison of blood GDPP levels by site of metastasis in PC (Local only: n = 60, Lymph node metastatic CRPC only: n = 12, Bone metastatic CRPC only: n = 31). ( D ) The analysis of the relationship between the BSI and GDPP, PSA, TRACP 5b, BAP, mGDF15, PINP, OC, ALP, or LDH in CRPC patients with BM is shown, together with the comparison of the strength of the correlation between each biomarker and the BSI ( n = 80). Statistical analyses were performed using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. ( E ) The relationships between the change in BSI (ΔBSI) and the changes in many blood biomarkers during systemic treatment in CRPC patients with BM showed that the change in GDPP (ΔGDPP) correlated best with the change in the BSI ( n = 22). Statistical analyses were performed using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. ( F ) This panel shows data from a representative patient who underwent longitudinal monitoring. During the clinical course of the patients, the plasma GDPP levels, rather than PSA levels, reflected the volume of BM revealed by PSMA PET. Red arrow indicates the solitary BM location from PCa. ( G ) Kaplan‒Meier analysis of the OS of CRPC patients with BM stratified by GDPP value; statistical analyses were performed using the log-rank test (** p < 0.01)
Bap, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/bap/product/ATCC
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
bap - by Bioz Stars, 2024-12
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
IBA Lifesciences 6 benzylaminopurine bap
Real-world data on GDPP in CRPC patients with BM. ( A ) A comparison of <t>GDPP,</t> <t>PSA,</t> TRACP 5b, <t>BAP,</t> mGDF15, PINP, OC, ALP, and LDH levels in healthy donors ( n = 30) versus CRPC patients with and without BM ( n = 80 and 75, respectively). The data show significantly elevated levels of GDPP, PSA, BAP, mGDF15 and LDH in patients with BM. GDPP: Growth differentiation factor 15 propeptide, Data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD), and statistical analyses were performed using the Tukey‒Kramer method (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01; n.s., not significant). ( B ) GDPP had the best AUC when comparing the diagnostic performance of each blood biomarker for BM in CRPC patients in each of the two randomized cohorts. ( C ) Comparison of blood GDPP levels by site of metastasis in PC (Local only: n = 60, Lymph node metastatic CRPC only: n = 12, Bone metastatic CRPC only: n = 31). ( D ) The analysis of the relationship between the BSI and GDPP, PSA, TRACP 5b, BAP, mGDF15, PINP, OC, ALP, or LDH in CRPC patients with BM is shown, together with the comparison of the strength of the correlation between each biomarker and the BSI ( n = 80). Statistical analyses were performed using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. ( E ) The relationships between the change in BSI (ΔBSI) and the changes in many blood biomarkers during systemic treatment in CRPC patients with BM showed that the change in GDPP (ΔGDPP) correlated best with the change in the BSI ( n = 22). Statistical analyses were performed using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. ( F ) This panel shows data from a representative patient who underwent longitudinal monitoring. During the clinical course of the patients, the plasma GDPP levels, rather than PSA levels, reflected the volume of BM revealed by PSMA PET. Red arrow indicates the solitary BM location from PCa. ( G ) Kaplan‒Meier analysis of the OS of CRPC patients with BM stratified by GDPP value; statistical analyses were performed using the log-rank test (** p < 0.01)
6 Benzylaminopurine Bap, supplied by IBA Lifesciences, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/6 benzylaminopurine bap/product/IBA Lifesciences
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
6 benzylaminopurine bap - by Bioz Stars, 2024-12
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

bap  (Roche)
86
Roche bap
Real-world data on GDPP in CRPC patients with BM. ( A ) A comparison of <t>GDPP,</t> <t>PSA,</t> TRACP 5b, <t>BAP,</t> mGDF15, PINP, OC, ALP, and LDH levels in healthy donors ( n = 30) versus CRPC patients with and without BM ( n = 80 and 75, respectively). The data show significantly elevated levels of GDPP, PSA, BAP, mGDF15 and LDH in patients with BM. GDPP: Growth differentiation factor 15 propeptide, Data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD), and statistical analyses were performed using the Tukey‒Kramer method (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01; n.s., not significant). ( B ) GDPP had the best AUC when comparing the diagnostic performance of each blood biomarker for BM in CRPC patients in each of the two randomized cohorts. ( C ) Comparison of blood GDPP levels by site of metastasis in PC (Local only: n = 60, Lymph node metastatic CRPC only: n = 12, Bone metastatic CRPC only: n = 31). ( D ) The analysis of the relationship between the BSI and GDPP, PSA, TRACP 5b, BAP, mGDF15, PINP, OC, ALP, or LDH in CRPC patients with BM is shown, together with the comparison of the strength of the correlation between each biomarker and the BSI ( n = 80). Statistical analyses were performed using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. ( E ) The relationships between the change in BSI (ΔBSI) and the changes in many blood biomarkers during systemic treatment in CRPC patients with BM showed that the change in GDPP (ΔGDPP) correlated best with the change in the BSI ( n = 22). Statistical analyses were performed using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. ( F ) This panel shows data from a representative patient who underwent longitudinal monitoring. During the clinical course of the patients, the plasma GDPP levels, rather than PSA levels, reflected the volume of BM revealed by PSMA PET. Red arrow indicates the solitary BM location from PCa. ( G ) Kaplan‒Meier analysis of the OS of CRPC patients with BM stratified by GDPP value; statistical analyses were performed using the log-rank test (** p < 0.01)
Bap, supplied by Roche, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/bap/product/Roche
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
bap - by Bioz Stars, 2024-12
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Change in BAP (plasma antioxidant capacity) values from baseline at T1 and T2 in the Spirulina and placebo groups. The dashed line shows the threshold above which BAP values are considered optimal. * indicates p ≤ 0.05.

Journal: Scientific Reports

Article Title: Effect of a weight loss diet with or without Spirulina supplementation on serum lipids and antioxidant capacity of overweight dogs

doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-80843-y

Figure Lengend Snippet: Change in BAP (plasma antioxidant capacity) values from baseline at T1 and T2 in the Spirulina and placebo groups. The dashed line shows the threshold above which BAP values are considered optimal. * indicates p ≤ 0.05.

Article Snippet: The plasma’s biological antioxidant potential (BAP) was determined using a commercial kit (Diacron, Grosseto, Italy) following the manufacturer’s instructions.

Techniques:

Real-world data on GDPP in CRPC patients with BM. ( A ) A comparison of GDPP, PSA, TRACP 5b, BAP, mGDF15, PINP, OC, ALP, and LDH levels in healthy donors ( n = 30) versus CRPC patients with and without BM ( n = 80 and 75, respectively). The data show significantly elevated levels of GDPP, PSA, BAP, mGDF15 and LDH in patients with BM. GDPP: Growth differentiation factor 15 propeptide, Data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD), and statistical analyses were performed using the Tukey‒Kramer method (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01; n.s., not significant). ( B ) GDPP had the best AUC when comparing the diagnostic performance of each blood biomarker for BM in CRPC patients in each of the two randomized cohorts. ( C ) Comparison of blood GDPP levels by site of metastasis in PC (Local only: n = 60, Lymph node metastatic CRPC only: n = 12, Bone metastatic CRPC only: n = 31). ( D ) The analysis of the relationship between the BSI and GDPP, PSA, TRACP 5b, BAP, mGDF15, PINP, OC, ALP, or LDH in CRPC patients with BM is shown, together with the comparison of the strength of the correlation between each biomarker and the BSI ( n = 80). Statistical analyses were performed using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. ( E ) The relationships between the change in BSI (ΔBSI) and the changes in many blood biomarkers during systemic treatment in CRPC patients with BM showed that the change in GDPP (ΔGDPP) correlated best with the change in the BSI ( n = 22). Statistical analyses were performed using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. ( F ) This panel shows data from a representative patient who underwent longitudinal monitoring. During the clinical course of the patients, the plasma GDPP levels, rather than PSA levels, reflected the volume of BM revealed by PSMA PET. Red arrow indicates the solitary BM location from PCa. ( G ) Kaplan‒Meier analysis of the OS of CRPC patients with BM stratified by GDPP value; statistical analyses were performed using the log-rank test (** p < 0.01)

Journal: Biomarker Research

Article Title: GDF15 propeptide promotes bone metastasis of castration-resistant prostate cancer by augmenting the bone microenvironment

doi: 10.1186/s40364-024-00695-6

Figure Lengend Snippet: Real-world data on GDPP in CRPC patients with BM. ( A ) A comparison of GDPP, PSA, TRACP 5b, BAP, mGDF15, PINP, OC, ALP, and LDH levels in healthy donors ( n = 30) versus CRPC patients with and without BM ( n = 80 and 75, respectively). The data show significantly elevated levels of GDPP, PSA, BAP, mGDF15 and LDH in patients with BM. GDPP: Growth differentiation factor 15 propeptide, Data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD), and statistical analyses were performed using the Tukey‒Kramer method (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01; n.s., not significant). ( B ) GDPP had the best AUC when comparing the diagnostic performance of each blood biomarker for BM in CRPC patients in each of the two randomized cohorts. ( C ) Comparison of blood GDPP levels by site of metastasis in PC (Local only: n = 60, Lymph node metastatic CRPC only: n = 12, Bone metastatic CRPC only: n = 31). ( D ) The analysis of the relationship between the BSI and GDPP, PSA, TRACP 5b, BAP, mGDF15, PINP, OC, ALP, or LDH in CRPC patients with BM is shown, together with the comparison of the strength of the correlation between each biomarker and the BSI ( n = 80). Statistical analyses were performed using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. ( E ) The relationships between the change in BSI (ΔBSI) and the changes in many blood biomarkers during systemic treatment in CRPC patients with BM showed that the change in GDPP (ΔGDPP) correlated best with the change in the BSI ( n = 22). Statistical analyses were performed using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. ( F ) This panel shows data from a representative patient who underwent longitudinal monitoring. During the clinical course of the patients, the plasma GDPP levels, rather than PSA levels, reflected the volume of BM revealed by PSMA PET. Red arrow indicates the solitary BM location from PCa. ( G ) Kaplan‒Meier analysis of the OS of CRPC patients with BM stratified by GDPP value; statistical analyses were performed using the log-rank test (** p < 0.01)

Article Snippet: Serum PSA (Beckman Coulter), ALP (Shino-Test Corporation), BAP (IDS, Inc.), TRACP 5b (Nittobo Medical), LDH (FUJIFILM Wako Pure Chemical Corporation), OC (Tosoh), mGDF15 (R&D Systems) and PINP (USCN) levels were measured in the same blood samples.

Techniques: Comparison, Standard Deviation, Diagnostic Assay, Biomarker Assay

Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis of OS in CRPC patients with BM ( n = 80)

Journal: Biomarker Research

Article Title: GDF15 propeptide promotes bone metastasis of castration-resistant prostate cancer by augmenting the bone microenvironment

doi: 10.1186/s40364-024-00695-6

Figure Lengend Snippet: Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis of OS in CRPC patients with BM ( n = 80)

Article Snippet: Serum PSA (Beckman Coulter), ALP (Shino-Test Corporation), BAP (IDS, Inc.), TRACP 5b (Nittobo Medical), LDH (FUJIFILM Wako Pure Chemical Corporation), OC (Tosoh), mGDF15 (R&D Systems) and PINP (USCN) levels were measured in the same blood samples.

Techniques:

Patient baseline characteristics and blood biomarker levels. All continuous data use median and range

Journal: Biomarker Research

Article Title: GDF15 propeptide promotes bone metastasis of castration-resistant prostate cancer by augmenting the bone microenvironment

doi: 10.1186/s40364-024-00695-6

Figure Lengend Snippet: Patient baseline characteristics and blood biomarker levels. All continuous data use median and range

Article Snippet: Serum PSA (Beckman Coulter), ALP (Shino-Test Corporation), BAP (IDS, Inc.), TRACP 5b (Nittobo Medical), LDH (FUJIFILM Wako Pure Chemical Corporation), OC (Tosoh), mGDF15 (R&D Systems) and PINP (USCN) levels were measured in the same blood samples.

Techniques: Biomarker Assay