anti her2 erbb2 rabbit polyclonal primary antibody  (Cell Signaling Technology Inc)


Bioz Verified Symbol Cell Signaling Technology Inc is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Cell Signaling Technology Inc manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 96

    Structured Review

    Cell Signaling Technology Inc anti her2 erbb2 rabbit polyclonal primary antibody
    <t>HER2</t> expression and cell cycle distribution in JIMT‐1 and N87 cells. a) HER2 expression in JIMT‐1 and N87 cells stained via ICC (red, Alexa 594‐stained HER2; blue, Hoechst‐stained nuclei, scale bar, 10 µm). Cell cycle distribution in b) JIMT‐1 and c) N87 cells treated with T‐DM1, LCB‐ADC1, or LCB‐ADC2 at 0.25 µg mL −1 for 72 h. Cells stained with propidium iodide (PI) were analyzed by flow cytometry.
    Anti Her2 Erbb2 Rabbit Polyclonal Primary Antibody, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/anti her2 erbb2 rabbit polyclonal primary antibody/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
    anti her2 erbb2 rabbit polyclonal primary antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2023-06
    96/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "An Elaborate New Linker System Significantly Enhances the Efficacy of an HER2‐Antibody‐Drug Conjugate against Refractory HER2‐Positive Cancers"

    Article Title: An Elaborate New Linker System Significantly Enhances the Efficacy of an HER2‐Antibody‐Drug Conjugate against Refractory HER2‐Positive Cancers

    Journal: Advanced Science

    doi: 10.1002/advs.202102414

    HER2 expression and cell cycle distribution in JIMT‐1 and N87 cells. a) HER2 expression in JIMT‐1 and N87 cells stained via ICC (red, Alexa 594‐stained HER2; blue, Hoechst‐stained nuclei, scale bar, 10 µm). Cell cycle distribution in b) JIMT‐1 and c) N87 cells treated with T‐DM1, LCB‐ADC1, or LCB‐ADC2 at 0.25 µg mL −1 for 72 h. Cells stained with propidium iodide (PI) were analyzed by flow cytometry.
    Figure Legend Snippet: HER2 expression and cell cycle distribution in JIMT‐1 and N87 cells. a) HER2 expression in JIMT‐1 and N87 cells stained via ICC (red, Alexa 594‐stained HER2; blue, Hoechst‐stained nuclei, scale bar, 10 µm). Cell cycle distribution in b) JIMT‐1 and c) N87 cells treated with T‐DM1, LCB‐ADC1, or LCB‐ADC2 at 0.25 µg mL −1 for 72 h. Cells stained with propidium iodide (PI) were analyzed by flow cytometry.

    Techniques Used: Expressing, Staining, Flow Cytometry

    Therapeutic efficacy of LCB‐ADCs in HER2‐positive CDX models and microtubule interruption and mitotic arrest in CDX tumor tissue. a) Effect of LCB‐ADC1, LCB‐ADC2, T‐DM1 in JIMT‐1 cells. Drugs were i.v. injected at 2 mg kg −1 once (↑), n = 5. Data values are the mean ± standard deviation. *** p < 0.001 (T‐DM1 vs LCB‐ADC1 or 2). b) Effect of LCB‐ADC1, LCB‐ADC2, T‐DM1 in N87 cells. Drugs were i.v. injected at 2 mg kg −1 once (↑), n = 5. Data values are the mean ± standard deviation. *** p < 0.001 (T‐DM1 vs LCB‐ADC 2). HER2 expression in tumor tissue was detected by IHC (brown, DAB‐stained HER2; blue, hematoxylin‐stained nuclei, scale bar, 10 µm). c) In vivo microtubule interruption and mitotic arrest by LCB‐ADC1. Mice bearing N87 tumors were i.v. administered with T‐DM1, LCB‐ADC1 at 5 mg kg −1 once. After 10 d, the tumors were isolated, fixed, and stained with anti‐ α ‐tubulin (upper, blue, Hoechst‐stained nuclei; red, Alexa 594‐stained α ‐tubulin, scale bar; 10 µm) or antiphosphohistone H3 (PHH3) (lower, blue, hematoxylin‐stained nuclei; brown, 3,3′‐diaminobenzidine (DAB)‐stained PHH3, scale bar, 100 µm). d) Effect of LCB‐ADC1 in N87 cells. Drugs were i.v. injected at 0.2, 1 or 5 mg kg −1 , once a week for 4 weeks (↑), n = 8. Data values are the mean ± standard deviation. *** p < 0.001 (T‐DM1 vs LCB‐ADC1).
    Figure Legend Snippet: Therapeutic efficacy of LCB‐ADCs in HER2‐positive CDX models and microtubule interruption and mitotic arrest in CDX tumor tissue. a) Effect of LCB‐ADC1, LCB‐ADC2, T‐DM1 in JIMT‐1 cells. Drugs were i.v. injected at 2 mg kg −1 once (↑), n = 5. Data values are the mean ± standard deviation. *** p < 0.001 (T‐DM1 vs LCB‐ADC1 or 2). b) Effect of LCB‐ADC1, LCB‐ADC2, T‐DM1 in N87 cells. Drugs were i.v. injected at 2 mg kg −1 once (↑), n = 5. Data values are the mean ± standard deviation. *** p < 0.001 (T‐DM1 vs LCB‐ADC 2). HER2 expression in tumor tissue was detected by IHC (brown, DAB‐stained HER2; blue, hematoxylin‐stained nuclei, scale bar, 10 µm). c) In vivo microtubule interruption and mitotic arrest by LCB‐ADC1. Mice bearing N87 tumors were i.v. administered with T‐DM1, LCB‐ADC1 at 5 mg kg −1 once. After 10 d, the tumors were isolated, fixed, and stained with anti‐ α ‐tubulin (upper, blue, Hoechst‐stained nuclei; red, Alexa 594‐stained α ‐tubulin, scale bar; 10 µm) or antiphosphohistone H3 (PHH3) (lower, blue, hematoxylin‐stained nuclei; brown, 3,3′‐diaminobenzidine (DAB)‐stained PHH3, scale bar, 100 µm). d) Effect of LCB‐ADC1 in N87 cells. Drugs were i.v. injected at 0.2, 1 or 5 mg kg −1 , once a week for 4 weeks (↑), n = 8. Data values are the mean ± standard deviation. *** p < 0.001 (T‐DM1 vs LCB‐ADC1).

    Techniques Used: Injection, Standard Deviation, Expressing, Staining, In Vivo, Isolation

    Therapeutic efficacy of LCB‐ADCs in HER2‐positive GC PDX models. a) Effect of LCB‐ADC1, LCB‐ADC2, T‐DM1 in an HER2 +++ GC PDX model. The drugs were i.v. injected at 5 mg kg −1 once (↑), n = 5. b) Effect of LCB‐ADC1, LCB‐ADC3, T‐DM1 in an HER2 ++ GC PDX model. Drugs were i.v. injected at 5 mg kg −1 twice (↑), n = 5. Data values are a mean ± standard deviation. ** p < 0.01 (T‐DM1 vs LCB‐ADC3, single or repeated treatment). HER2 expression in tumor tissues was detected by IHC (brown, DAB‐stained HER2; blue, hematoxylin‐stained nuclei, scale bar, 10 µm). c,d) Mice bearing HER2 ++ GC patient‐derived tumors were i.v. administered with LCB‐ADC1, LCB‐ADC3, or T‐DM1 at 5 mg kg −1 , every other week for 4 weeks, n = 5. At the end of the experiment, c) tumors were isolated, photographed (scale bar, 1 cm) and d) weighed. Data values are mean ± standard deviation. * p < 0.05 (T‐DM1 vs LCB‐ADC1), ** p < 0.01 (T‐DM1 vs LCB‐ADC3).
    Figure Legend Snippet: Therapeutic efficacy of LCB‐ADCs in HER2‐positive GC PDX models. a) Effect of LCB‐ADC1, LCB‐ADC2, T‐DM1 in an HER2 +++ GC PDX model. The drugs were i.v. injected at 5 mg kg −1 once (↑), n = 5. b) Effect of LCB‐ADC1, LCB‐ADC3, T‐DM1 in an HER2 ++ GC PDX model. Drugs were i.v. injected at 5 mg kg −1 twice (↑), n = 5. Data values are a mean ± standard deviation. ** p < 0.01 (T‐DM1 vs LCB‐ADC3, single or repeated treatment). HER2 expression in tumor tissues was detected by IHC (brown, DAB‐stained HER2; blue, hematoxylin‐stained nuclei, scale bar, 10 µm). c,d) Mice bearing HER2 ++ GC patient‐derived tumors were i.v. administered with LCB‐ADC1, LCB‐ADC3, or T‐DM1 at 5 mg kg −1 , every other week for 4 weeks, n = 5. At the end of the experiment, c) tumors were isolated, photographed (scale bar, 1 cm) and d) weighed. Data values are mean ± standard deviation. * p < 0.05 (T‐DM1 vs LCB‐ADC1), ** p < 0.01 (T‐DM1 vs LCB‐ADC3).

    Techniques Used: Injection, Standard Deviation, Expressing, Staining, Derivative Assay, Isolation

    In vivo efficacy of LCB‐ADC3 at a low dose in an HER2 ++ GC PDX model. a) Tumor growth delay curves and b) survival rate when the tumor volume reached 1500 mm 3 . Mice bearing patient‐derived tumors were i.v. administered LCB‐ADC3 (0.5 or 1 mg kg −1 ) or T‐DM1 (4 mg kg −1 ), weekly for 4 weeks (↑), n = 5. Data values are the mean ± standard deviation. ** p < 0.01 (T‐DM1 vs LCB‐ADC3, 0.05 mg kg −1 ), *** p < 0.001 (T‐DM1 vs LCB‐ADC3, 1 mg kg −1 ).
    Figure Legend Snippet: In vivo efficacy of LCB‐ADC3 at a low dose in an HER2 ++ GC PDX model. a) Tumor growth delay curves and b) survival rate when the tumor volume reached 1500 mm 3 . Mice bearing patient‐derived tumors were i.v. administered LCB‐ADC3 (0.5 or 1 mg kg −1 ) or T‐DM1 (4 mg kg −1 ), weekly for 4 weeks (↑), n = 5. Data values are the mean ± standard deviation. ** p < 0.01 (T‐DM1 vs LCB‐ADC3, 0.05 mg kg −1 ), *** p < 0.001 (T‐DM1 vs LCB‐ADC3, 1 mg kg −1 ).

    Techniques Used: In Vivo, Derivative Assay, Standard Deviation

    Mitotic arrest of HER2‐positive GC PDX tumor tissue. a,b) Mice bearing HER2‐positive PDX tumors were i.v. administered with a) LCB‐ADC2, b) LCB‐ADC3 or T‐DM1 at 5 mg kg −1 once, n = 5. After 1, 4, and 7 d, the tumors were isolated, fixed, and stained with antiphosphohistone H3 (PHH3) (blue, hematoxylin‐stained nuclei; brown, DAB‐stained PHH3, scale bar, 100 µm). Data values are a mean ± standard deviation. *** p < 0.001 (T‐DM1 vs LCB‐ADC2 or 3).
    Figure Legend Snippet: Mitotic arrest of HER2‐positive GC PDX tumor tissue. a,b) Mice bearing HER2‐positive PDX tumors were i.v. administered with a) LCB‐ADC2, b) LCB‐ADC3 or T‐DM1 at 5 mg kg −1 once, n = 5. After 1, 4, and 7 d, the tumors were isolated, fixed, and stained with antiphosphohistone H3 (PHH3) (blue, hematoxylin‐stained nuclei; brown, DAB‐stained PHH3, scale bar, 100 µm). Data values are a mean ± standard deviation. *** p < 0.001 (T‐DM1 vs LCB‐ADC2 or 3).

    Techniques Used: Isolation, Staining, Standard Deviation

    Similar Products

  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 96
    Cell Signaling Technology Inc anti her2 erbb2 rabbit polyclonal primary antibody
    <t>HER2</t> expression and cell cycle distribution in JIMT‐1 and N87 cells. a) HER2 expression in JIMT‐1 and N87 cells stained via ICC (red, Alexa 594‐stained HER2; blue, Hoechst‐stained nuclei, scale bar, 10 µm). Cell cycle distribution in b) JIMT‐1 and c) N87 cells treated with T‐DM1, LCB‐ADC1, or LCB‐ADC2 at 0.25 µg mL −1 for 72 h. Cells stained with propidium iodide (PI) were analyzed by flow cytometry.
    Anti Her2 Erbb2 Rabbit Polyclonal Primary Antibody, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/anti her2 erbb2 rabbit polyclonal primary antibody/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
    anti her2 erbb2 rabbit polyclonal primary antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2023-06
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    HER2 expression and cell cycle distribution in JIMT‐1 and N87 cells. a) HER2 expression in JIMT‐1 and N87 cells stained via ICC (red, Alexa 594‐stained HER2; blue, Hoechst‐stained nuclei, scale bar, 10 µm). Cell cycle distribution in b) JIMT‐1 and c) N87 cells treated with T‐DM1, LCB‐ADC1, or LCB‐ADC2 at 0.25 µg mL −1 for 72 h. Cells stained with propidium iodide (PI) were analyzed by flow cytometry.

    Journal: Advanced Science

    Article Title: An Elaborate New Linker System Significantly Enhances the Efficacy of an HER2‐Antibody‐Drug Conjugate against Refractory HER2‐Positive Cancers

    doi: 10.1002/advs.202102414

    Figure Lengend Snippet: HER2 expression and cell cycle distribution in JIMT‐1 and N87 cells. a) HER2 expression in JIMT‐1 and N87 cells stained via ICC (red, Alexa 594‐stained HER2; blue, Hoechst‐stained nuclei, scale bar, 10 µm). Cell cycle distribution in b) JIMT‐1 and c) N87 cells treated with T‐DM1, LCB‐ADC1, or LCB‐ADC2 at 0.25 µg mL −1 for 72 h. Cells stained with propidium iodide (PI) were analyzed by flow cytometry.

    Article Snippet: After thorough washing with PBS, the cells were incubated with anti‐HER2/ErbB2 rabbit polyclonal primary antibody (#2242S; Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA), anti‐ α ‐tubulin rabbit monoclonal primary antibody (#2125S; Cell Signaling), and Alexa 594 or 488 antirabbit IgG (Jackson Immuno Research, West Grove, PA).

    Techniques: Expressing, Staining, Flow Cytometry

    Therapeutic efficacy of LCB‐ADCs in HER2‐positive CDX models and microtubule interruption and mitotic arrest in CDX tumor tissue. a) Effect of LCB‐ADC1, LCB‐ADC2, T‐DM1 in JIMT‐1 cells. Drugs were i.v. injected at 2 mg kg −1 once (↑), n = 5. Data values are the mean ± standard deviation. *** p < 0.001 (T‐DM1 vs LCB‐ADC1 or 2). b) Effect of LCB‐ADC1, LCB‐ADC2, T‐DM1 in N87 cells. Drugs were i.v. injected at 2 mg kg −1 once (↑), n = 5. Data values are the mean ± standard deviation. *** p < 0.001 (T‐DM1 vs LCB‐ADC 2). HER2 expression in tumor tissue was detected by IHC (brown, DAB‐stained HER2; blue, hematoxylin‐stained nuclei, scale bar, 10 µm). c) In vivo microtubule interruption and mitotic arrest by LCB‐ADC1. Mice bearing N87 tumors were i.v. administered with T‐DM1, LCB‐ADC1 at 5 mg kg −1 once. After 10 d, the tumors were isolated, fixed, and stained with anti‐ α ‐tubulin (upper, blue, Hoechst‐stained nuclei; red, Alexa 594‐stained α ‐tubulin, scale bar; 10 µm) or antiphosphohistone H3 (PHH3) (lower, blue, hematoxylin‐stained nuclei; brown, 3,3′‐diaminobenzidine (DAB)‐stained PHH3, scale bar, 100 µm). d) Effect of LCB‐ADC1 in N87 cells. Drugs were i.v. injected at 0.2, 1 or 5 mg kg −1 , once a week for 4 weeks (↑), n = 8. Data values are the mean ± standard deviation. *** p < 0.001 (T‐DM1 vs LCB‐ADC1).

    Journal: Advanced Science

    Article Title: An Elaborate New Linker System Significantly Enhances the Efficacy of an HER2‐Antibody‐Drug Conjugate against Refractory HER2‐Positive Cancers

    doi: 10.1002/advs.202102414

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Therapeutic efficacy of LCB‐ADCs in HER2‐positive CDX models and microtubule interruption and mitotic arrest in CDX tumor tissue. a) Effect of LCB‐ADC1, LCB‐ADC2, T‐DM1 in JIMT‐1 cells. Drugs were i.v. injected at 2 mg kg −1 once (↑), n = 5. Data values are the mean ± standard deviation. *** p < 0.001 (T‐DM1 vs LCB‐ADC1 or 2). b) Effect of LCB‐ADC1, LCB‐ADC2, T‐DM1 in N87 cells. Drugs were i.v. injected at 2 mg kg −1 once (↑), n = 5. Data values are the mean ± standard deviation. *** p < 0.001 (T‐DM1 vs LCB‐ADC 2). HER2 expression in tumor tissue was detected by IHC (brown, DAB‐stained HER2; blue, hematoxylin‐stained nuclei, scale bar, 10 µm). c) In vivo microtubule interruption and mitotic arrest by LCB‐ADC1. Mice bearing N87 tumors were i.v. administered with T‐DM1, LCB‐ADC1 at 5 mg kg −1 once. After 10 d, the tumors were isolated, fixed, and stained with anti‐ α ‐tubulin (upper, blue, Hoechst‐stained nuclei; red, Alexa 594‐stained α ‐tubulin, scale bar; 10 µm) or antiphosphohistone H3 (PHH3) (lower, blue, hematoxylin‐stained nuclei; brown, 3,3′‐diaminobenzidine (DAB)‐stained PHH3, scale bar, 100 µm). d) Effect of LCB‐ADC1 in N87 cells. Drugs were i.v. injected at 0.2, 1 or 5 mg kg −1 , once a week for 4 weeks (↑), n = 8. Data values are the mean ± standard deviation. *** p < 0.001 (T‐DM1 vs LCB‐ADC1).

    Article Snippet: After thorough washing with PBS, the cells were incubated with anti‐HER2/ErbB2 rabbit polyclonal primary antibody (#2242S; Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA), anti‐ α ‐tubulin rabbit monoclonal primary antibody (#2125S; Cell Signaling), and Alexa 594 or 488 antirabbit IgG (Jackson Immuno Research, West Grove, PA).

    Techniques: Injection, Standard Deviation, Expressing, Staining, In Vivo, Isolation

    Therapeutic efficacy of LCB‐ADCs in HER2‐positive GC PDX models. a) Effect of LCB‐ADC1, LCB‐ADC2, T‐DM1 in an HER2 +++ GC PDX model. The drugs were i.v. injected at 5 mg kg −1 once (↑), n = 5. b) Effect of LCB‐ADC1, LCB‐ADC3, T‐DM1 in an HER2 ++ GC PDX model. Drugs were i.v. injected at 5 mg kg −1 twice (↑), n = 5. Data values are a mean ± standard deviation. ** p < 0.01 (T‐DM1 vs LCB‐ADC3, single or repeated treatment). HER2 expression in tumor tissues was detected by IHC (brown, DAB‐stained HER2; blue, hematoxylin‐stained nuclei, scale bar, 10 µm). c,d) Mice bearing HER2 ++ GC patient‐derived tumors were i.v. administered with LCB‐ADC1, LCB‐ADC3, or T‐DM1 at 5 mg kg −1 , every other week for 4 weeks, n = 5. At the end of the experiment, c) tumors were isolated, photographed (scale bar, 1 cm) and d) weighed. Data values are mean ± standard deviation. * p < 0.05 (T‐DM1 vs LCB‐ADC1), ** p < 0.01 (T‐DM1 vs LCB‐ADC3).

    Journal: Advanced Science

    Article Title: An Elaborate New Linker System Significantly Enhances the Efficacy of an HER2‐Antibody‐Drug Conjugate against Refractory HER2‐Positive Cancers

    doi: 10.1002/advs.202102414

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Therapeutic efficacy of LCB‐ADCs in HER2‐positive GC PDX models. a) Effect of LCB‐ADC1, LCB‐ADC2, T‐DM1 in an HER2 +++ GC PDX model. The drugs were i.v. injected at 5 mg kg −1 once (↑), n = 5. b) Effect of LCB‐ADC1, LCB‐ADC3, T‐DM1 in an HER2 ++ GC PDX model. Drugs were i.v. injected at 5 mg kg −1 twice (↑), n = 5. Data values are a mean ± standard deviation. ** p < 0.01 (T‐DM1 vs LCB‐ADC3, single or repeated treatment). HER2 expression in tumor tissues was detected by IHC (brown, DAB‐stained HER2; blue, hematoxylin‐stained nuclei, scale bar, 10 µm). c,d) Mice bearing HER2 ++ GC patient‐derived tumors were i.v. administered with LCB‐ADC1, LCB‐ADC3, or T‐DM1 at 5 mg kg −1 , every other week for 4 weeks, n = 5. At the end of the experiment, c) tumors were isolated, photographed (scale bar, 1 cm) and d) weighed. Data values are mean ± standard deviation. * p < 0.05 (T‐DM1 vs LCB‐ADC1), ** p < 0.01 (T‐DM1 vs LCB‐ADC3).

    Article Snippet: After thorough washing with PBS, the cells were incubated with anti‐HER2/ErbB2 rabbit polyclonal primary antibody (#2242S; Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA), anti‐ α ‐tubulin rabbit monoclonal primary antibody (#2125S; Cell Signaling), and Alexa 594 or 488 antirabbit IgG (Jackson Immuno Research, West Grove, PA).

    Techniques: Injection, Standard Deviation, Expressing, Staining, Derivative Assay, Isolation

    In vivo efficacy of LCB‐ADC3 at a low dose in an HER2 ++ GC PDX model. a) Tumor growth delay curves and b) survival rate when the tumor volume reached 1500 mm 3 . Mice bearing patient‐derived tumors were i.v. administered LCB‐ADC3 (0.5 or 1 mg kg −1 ) or T‐DM1 (4 mg kg −1 ), weekly for 4 weeks (↑), n = 5. Data values are the mean ± standard deviation. ** p < 0.01 (T‐DM1 vs LCB‐ADC3, 0.05 mg kg −1 ), *** p < 0.001 (T‐DM1 vs LCB‐ADC3, 1 mg kg −1 ).

    Journal: Advanced Science

    Article Title: An Elaborate New Linker System Significantly Enhances the Efficacy of an HER2‐Antibody‐Drug Conjugate against Refractory HER2‐Positive Cancers

    doi: 10.1002/advs.202102414

    Figure Lengend Snippet: In vivo efficacy of LCB‐ADC3 at a low dose in an HER2 ++ GC PDX model. a) Tumor growth delay curves and b) survival rate when the tumor volume reached 1500 mm 3 . Mice bearing patient‐derived tumors were i.v. administered LCB‐ADC3 (0.5 or 1 mg kg −1 ) or T‐DM1 (4 mg kg −1 ), weekly for 4 weeks (↑), n = 5. Data values are the mean ± standard deviation. ** p < 0.01 (T‐DM1 vs LCB‐ADC3, 0.05 mg kg −1 ), *** p < 0.001 (T‐DM1 vs LCB‐ADC3, 1 mg kg −1 ).

    Article Snippet: After thorough washing with PBS, the cells were incubated with anti‐HER2/ErbB2 rabbit polyclonal primary antibody (#2242S; Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA), anti‐ α ‐tubulin rabbit monoclonal primary antibody (#2125S; Cell Signaling), and Alexa 594 or 488 antirabbit IgG (Jackson Immuno Research, West Grove, PA).

    Techniques: In Vivo, Derivative Assay, Standard Deviation

    Mitotic arrest of HER2‐positive GC PDX tumor tissue. a,b) Mice bearing HER2‐positive PDX tumors were i.v. administered with a) LCB‐ADC2, b) LCB‐ADC3 or T‐DM1 at 5 mg kg −1 once, n = 5. After 1, 4, and 7 d, the tumors were isolated, fixed, and stained with antiphosphohistone H3 (PHH3) (blue, hematoxylin‐stained nuclei; brown, DAB‐stained PHH3, scale bar, 100 µm). Data values are a mean ± standard deviation. *** p < 0.001 (T‐DM1 vs LCB‐ADC2 or 3).

    Journal: Advanced Science

    Article Title: An Elaborate New Linker System Significantly Enhances the Efficacy of an HER2‐Antibody‐Drug Conjugate against Refractory HER2‐Positive Cancers

    doi: 10.1002/advs.202102414

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Mitotic arrest of HER2‐positive GC PDX tumor tissue. a,b) Mice bearing HER2‐positive PDX tumors were i.v. administered with a) LCB‐ADC2, b) LCB‐ADC3 or T‐DM1 at 5 mg kg −1 once, n = 5. After 1, 4, and 7 d, the tumors were isolated, fixed, and stained with antiphosphohistone H3 (PHH3) (blue, hematoxylin‐stained nuclei; brown, DAB‐stained PHH3, scale bar, 100 µm). Data values are a mean ± standard deviation. *** p < 0.001 (T‐DM1 vs LCB‐ADC2 or 3).

    Article Snippet: After thorough washing with PBS, the cells were incubated with anti‐HER2/ErbB2 rabbit polyclonal primary antibody (#2242S; Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA), anti‐ α ‐tubulin rabbit monoclonal primary antibody (#2125S; Cell Signaling), and Alexa 594 or 488 antirabbit IgG (Jackson Immuno Research, West Grove, PA).

    Techniques: Isolation, Staining, Standard Deviation