rabbit eno1  (Cell Signaling Technology Inc)


Bioz Verified Symbol Cell Signaling Technology Inc is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Cell Signaling Technology Inc manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 95

    Structured Review

    Cell Signaling Technology Inc rabbit eno1
    Top Candidate Proteins Involved in Oridonin-treated ESCC.
    Rabbit Eno1, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/rabbit eno1/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
    rabbit eno1 - by Bioz Stars, 2023-03
    95/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Oridonin Induces Apoptosis in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma by Inhibiting Cytoskeletal Protein LASP1 and PDLIM1"

    Article Title: Oridonin Induces Apoptosis in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma by Inhibiting Cytoskeletal Protein LASP1 and PDLIM1

    Journal: Molecules

    doi: 10.3390/molecules28020805

    Top Candidate Proteins Involved in Oridonin-treated ESCC.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Top Candidate Proteins Involved in Oridonin-treated ESCC.

    Techniques Used: Variant Assay

    Gene Set Enrichment Analysis and western blotting assessed that oridonin inhibits LASP1 and PDLIM1 on ESCC. ( A ) Molecular function classification of the protein candidates involved in oridonin treatment. The top three are cadherin binding, cadherin binding involved in cell–cell adhesion, and heat shock protein binding. ( B ) The top three cellular component classifications are focal adhesion, cell-substrate junction, and cell cortex. ( C ) The top three biological processes are negative regulation of apoptotic signaling pathway, removal of superoxide radicals, and cellular response to oxygen radicals. ( D ) Protein expression of LASP1 and PDLIM1 under oridonin treatment decreased compared to untreated cell lysates. Hsp70 expression increased in oridonin-treated cell lysates compared to untreated while ENO1 decreased a little in treated TE-8.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Gene Set Enrichment Analysis and western blotting assessed that oridonin inhibits LASP1 and PDLIM1 on ESCC. ( A ) Molecular function classification of the protein candidates involved in oridonin treatment. The top three are cadherin binding, cadherin binding involved in cell–cell adhesion, and heat shock protein binding. ( B ) The top three cellular component classifications are focal adhesion, cell-substrate junction, and cell cortex. ( C ) The top three biological processes are negative regulation of apoptotic signaling pathway, removal of superoxide radicals, and cellular response to oxygen radicals. ( D ) Protein expression of LASP1 and PDLIM1 under oridonin treatment decreased compared to untreated cell lysates. Hsp70 expression increased in oridonin-treated cell lysates compared to untreated while ENO1 decreased a little in treated TE-8.

    Techniques Used: Western Blot, Binding Assay, Protein Binding, Expressing

    Interested Genes for Protein Assessment Involved in Oridonin Treatment.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Interested Genes for Protein Assessment Involved in Oridonin Treatment.

    Techniques Used: Binding Assay, Protein Binding

    rabbit eno1  (Cell Signaling Technology Inc)


    Bioz Verified Symbol Cell Signaling Technology Inc is a verified supplier
    Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Cell Signaling Technology Inc manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 95

    Structured Review

    Cell Signaling Technology Inc rabbit eno1
    Top Candidate Proteins Involved in Oridonin-treated ESCC.
    Rabbit Eno1, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/rabbit eno1/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
    rabbit eno1 - by Bioz Stars, 2023-03
    95/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Oridonin Induces Apoptosis in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma by Inhibiting Cytoskeletal Protein LASP1 and PDLIM1"

    Article Title: Oridonin Induces Apoptosis in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma by Inhibiting Cytoskeletal Protein LASP1 and PDLIM1

    Journal: Molecules

    doi: 10.3390/molecules28020805

    Top Candidate Proteins Involved in Oridonin-treated ESCC.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Top Candidate Proteins Involved in Oridonin-treated ESCC.

    Techniques Used: Variant Assay

    Gene Set Enrichment Analysis and western blotting assessed that oridonin inhibits LASP1 and PDLIM1 on ESCC. ( A ) Molecular function classification of the protein candidates involved in oridonin treatment. The top three are cadherin binding, cadherin binding involved in cell–cell adhesion, and heat shock protein binding. ( B ) The top three cellular component classifications are focal adhesion, cell-substrate junction, and cell cortex. ( C ) The top three biological processes are negative regulation of apoptotic signaling pathway, removal of superoxide radicals, and cellular response to oxygen radicals. ( D ) Protein expression of LASP1 and PDLIM1 under oridonin treatment decreased compared to untreated cell lysates. Hsp70 expression increased in oridonin-treated cell lysates compared to untreated while ENO1 decreased a little in treated TE-8.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Gene Set Enrichment Analysis and western blotting assessed that oridonin inhibits LASP1 and PDLIM1 on ESCC. ( A ) Molecular function classification of the protein candidates involved in oridonin treatment. The top three are cadherin binding, cadherin binding involved in cell–cell adhesion, and heat shock protein binding. ( B ) The top three cellular component classifications are focal adhesion, cell-substrate junction, and cell cortex. ( C ) The top three biological processes are negative regulation of apoptotic signaling pathway, removal of superoxide radicals, and cellular response to oxygen radicals. ( D ) Protein expression of LASP1 and PDLIM1 under oridonin treatment decreased compared to untreated cell lysates. Hsp70 expression increased in oridonin-treated cell lysates compared to untreated while ENO1 decreased a little in treated TE-8.

    Techniques Used: Western Blot, Binding Assay, Protein Binding, Expressing

    Interested Genes for Protein Assessment Involved in Oridonin Treatment.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Interested Genes for Protein Assessment Involved in Oridonin Treatment.

    Techniques Used: Binding Assay, Protein Binding

    eno1 antibodies  (Cell Signaling Technology Inc)


    Bioz Verified Symbol Cell Signaling Technology Inc is a verified supplier
    Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Cell Signaling Technology Inc manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 95

    Structured Review

    Cell Signaling Technology Inc eno1 antibodies
    AP-III-a4 inhibits cell proliferation and glucose metabolism in HNSCC cells through suppressing ENO2-mediated downstream signaling. a Effect of AP-III-a4 treatment on <t>ENO1</t> and ENO2 protein levels determined by western blotting. UM-1 and Cal27 cells were treated with AP-III-a4 at a dose range (0, 1, 2.5, 5µM) for 48 h. b - e Effect of AP-III-a4 treatment on ENO2-mediated downstream targets ( b ), cell proliferation ( c ), and intracellular levels of ATP ( d ) and glucose uptake ( e ). UM-1 and Cal27 cells were treated with or without 5µM AP-III-a4 for 48 h. * p <0.05; ** p <0.01
    Eno1 Antibodies, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/eno1 antibodies/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
    eno1 antibodies - by Bioz Stars, 2023-03
    95/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Mediation of PKM2-dependent glycolytic and non-glycolytic pathways by ENO2 in head and neck cancer development"

    Article Title: Mediation of PKM2-dependent glycolytic and non-glycolytic pathways by ENO2 in head and neck cancer development

    Journal: Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research : CR

    doi: 10.1186/s13046-022-02574-0

    AP-III-a4 inhibits cell proliferation and glucose metabolism in HNSCC cells through suppressing ENO2-mediated downstream signaling. a Effect of AP-III-a4 treatment on ENO1 and ENO2 protein levels determined by western blotting. UM-1 and Cal27 cells were treated with AP-III-a4 at a dose range (0, 1, 2.5, 5µM) for 48 h. b - e Effect of AP-III-a4 treatment on ENO2-mediated downstream targets ( b ), cell proliferation ( c ), and intracellular levels of ATP ( d ) and glucose uptake ( e ). UM-1 and Cal27 cells were treated with or without 5µM AP-III-a4 for 48 h. * p <0.05; ** p <0.01
    Figure Legend Snippet: AP-III-a4 inhibits cell proliferation and glucose metabolism in HNSCC cells through suppressing ENO2-mediated downstream signaling. a Effect of AP-III-a4 treatment on ENO1 and ENO2 protein levels determined by western blotting. UM-1 and Cal27 cells were treated with AP-III-a4 at a dose range (0, 1, 2.5, 5µM) for 48 h. b - e Effect of AP-III-a4 treatment on ENO2-mediated downstream targets ( b ), cell proliferation ( c ), and intracellular levels of ATP ( d ) and glucose uptake ( e ). UM-1 and Cal27 cells were treated with or without 5µM AP-III-a4 for 48 h. * p <0.05; ** p <0.01

    Techniques Used: Western Blot

    anti inflammatory regulators  (Cell Signaling Technology Inc)


    Bioz Verified Symbol Cell Signaling Technology Inc is a verified supplier
    Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Cell Signaling Technology Inc manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 95

    Structured Review

    Cell Signaling Technology Inc anti inflammatory regulators
    Anti Inflammatory Regulators, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/anti inflammatory regulators/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
    anti inflammatory regulators - by Bioz Stars, 2023-03
    95/100 stars

    Images

    anti enolase 1  (Cell Signaling Technology Inc)


    Bioz Verified Symbol Cell Signaling Technology Inc is a verified supplier
    Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Cell Signaling Technology Inc manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 95

    Structured Review

    Cell Signaling Technology Inc anti enolase 1
    Anti Enolase 1, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/anti enolase 1/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
    anti enolase 1 - by Bioz Stars, 2023-03
    95/100 stars

    Images

    eno1  (Cell Signaling Technology Inc)


    Bioz Verified Symbol Cell Signaling Technology Inc is a verified supplier
    Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Cell Signaling Technology Inc manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 95

    Structured Review

    Cell Signaling Technology Inc eno1
    Prediction of the tumor suppressors in CM by mass spectrometry-based whole-genome proteomics. The single and double asterisks indicate p < 0.05 and 0.01, respectively. CN = control, Oct4 = Oct4 plasmids, c-Myc = c-Myc plasmids, Sox2 = Sox2 plasmids, Klf4 = Klf4 plasmids, and CM = conditioned medium. ( A ) Summary list of the potential tumor suppressors by mass spectrometry-based whole-genome proteomics. ( B ) <t>Enolase</t> <t>1</t> <t>(Eno1),</t> Hsp90ab1 (HSP), Eef2, and vinculin (VCL) as 4 tumor-suppressor candidates based on MTT-based viability. ( C ) Upregulation of Eno1, Hsp90ab1, Eef2, VCL, p53, and Trail in 4T1.2 cell-derived CM with the overexpression of Oct4, c-Myc, and the treatment with OAC2. The overexpression of Sox2 and Klf4 did not alter their levels. ( D ) Alterations in the levels of Eno1 and Hsp90ab1 in Oct4 and c-Myc CM by ELISA. ( E ) Reduction in MTT-based viability of 4T1.2 cells by the treatment with Eno1 and/or Hsp90ab1 recombinant proteins. ( F ) Tumor selectivity from the MTT-based viability of tumor cells (4T1.2 mammary tumor cells, EO771 mammary tumor cells, and MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells) and human epithelium cells (KTB34-hTERT and KTB22-hTERT). Tumor selectivity is defined as a ratio of (MTT-based reduction in tumor cells) to (MTT-based reduction in non-tumor cells).
    Eno1, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/eno1/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
    eno1 - by Bioz Stars, 2023-03
    95/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Counterintuitive production of tumor-suppressive secretomes from Oct4- and c-Myc-overexpressing tumor cells and MSCs"

    Article Title: Counterintuitive production of tumor-suppressive secretomes from Oct4- and c-Myc-overexpressing tumor cells and MSCs

    Journal: Theranostics

    doi: 10.7150/thno.70549

    Prediction of the tumor suppressors in CM by mass spectrometry-based whole-genome proteomics. The single and double asterisks indicate p < 0.05 and 0.01, respectively. CN = control, Oct4 = Oct4 plasmids, c-Myc = c-Myc plasmids, Sox2 = Sox2 plasmids, Klf4 = Klf4 plasmids, and CM = conditioned medium. ( A ) Summary list of the potential tumor suppressors by mass spectrometry-based whole-genome proteomics. ( B ) Enolase 1 (Eno1), Hsp90ab1 (HSP), Eef2, and vinculin (VCL) as 4 tumor-suppressor candidates based on MTT-based viability. ( C ) Upregulation of Eno1, Hsp90ab1, Eef2, VCL, p53, and Trail in 4T1.2 cell-derived CM with the overexpression of Oct4, c-Myc, and the treatment with OAC2. The overexpression of Sox2 and Klf4 did not alter their levels. ( D ) Alterations in the levels of Eno1 and Hsp90ab1 in Oct4 and c-Myc CM by ELISA. ( E ) Reduction in MTT-based viability of 4T1.2 cells by the treatment with Eno1 and/or Hsp90ab1 recombinant proteins. ( F ) Tumor selectivity from the MTT-based viability of tumor cells (4T1.2 mammary tumor cells, EO771 mammary tumor cells, and MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells) and human epithelium cells (KTB34-hTERT and KTB22-hTERT). Tumor selectivity is defined as a ratio of (MTT-based reduction in tumor cells) to (MTT-based reduction in non-tumor cells).
    Figure Legend Snippet: Prediction of the tumor suppressors in CM by mass spectrometry-based whole-genome proteomics. The single and double asterisks indicate p < 0.05 and 0.01, respectively. CN = control, Oct4 = Oct4 plasmids, c-Myc = c-Myc plasmids, Sox2 = Sox2 plasmids, Klf4 = Klf4 plasmids, and CM = conditioned medium. ( A ) Summary list of the potential tumor suppressors by mass spectrometry-based whole-genome proteomics. ( B ) Enolase 1 (Eno1), Hsp90ab1 (HSP), Eef2, and vinculin (VCL) as 4 tumor-suppressor candidates based on MTT-based viability. ( C ) Upregulation of Eno1, Hsp90ab1, Eef2, VCL, p53, and Trail in 4T1.2 cell-derived CM with the overexpression of Oct4, c-Myc, and the treatment with OAC2. The overexpression of Sox2 and Klf4 did not alter their levels. ( D ) Alterations in the levels of Eno1 and Hsp90ab1 in Oct4 and c-Myc CM by ELISA. ( E ) Reduction in MTT-based viability of 4T1.2 cells by the treatment with Eno1 and/or Hsp90ab1 recombinant proteins. ( F ) Tumor selectivity from the MTT-based viability of tumor cells (4T1.2 mammary tumor cells, EO771 mammary tumor cells, and MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells) and human epithelium cells (KTB34-hTERT and KTB22-hTERT). Tumor selectivity is defined as a ratio of (MTT-based reduction in tumor cells) to (MTT-based reduction in non-tumor cells).

    Techniques Used: Mass Spectrometry, Derivative Assay, Over Expression, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Recombinant

    Tumor-promoting effects by the overexpression of Eno1, Eef2, and VCL in 4T1.2 mammary tumor cells, and tumor-suppressing effects by the administration of their recombinant proteins. The double asterisk indicates p < 0.01. CN = control, Eno1 = enolase 1, VCL = vinculin, and Hsp = Hsp90ab1. ( A-C ) Elevation in EdU-based proliferation, transwell invasion, and the upregulation of Lrp5, MMP9, Runx2, TGFβ, and Snail by the overexpression of Eno1, Eef2, and VCL in 4T1.2 tumor cells. ( D ) Decrease in EdU-based proliferation by the administration of Eno1, Eef2, and VCL recombinant proteins. ( E ) Reduction in transwell invasion by the administration of Eno1, Eef2, and VCL recombinant proteins. ( F ) Downregulation of Lrp5, MMP9, Runx2, TGFβ, and Snail in 4T1.2 tumor cells by the administration of Eno1, Eef2, and VCL recombinant proteins. ( G ) Co-immunoprecipitation of CD44 by Eno1 in 4T1.2 cells. ( H-I ) Suppression of the reduction in MTT-based viability by Eno1 in response to the silencing of CD44. ( J ) Downregulation of Lrp5, Runx2, MMP9 and Snail in 4T1.2 cells by the administration of Eno1 recombinant proteins, and the suppression by the silencing of CD44. ( K-L ) Western blotting of wild-type and mutant CD44 proteins, which were pulled down by Halo-tagged Eno1 proteins. PD = pull-down assay, NC = negative control, pl = Eno1 or CD44 proteins from plasmid transfection, MT = mutant CD44 without a cytoplasmic domain, and WT = wild-type CD44.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Tumor-promoting effects by the overexpression of Eno1, Eef2, and VCL in 4T1.2 mammary tumor cells, and tumor-suppressing effects by the administration of their recombinant proteins. The double asterisk indicates p < 0.01. CN = control, Eno1 = enolase 1, VCL = vinculin, and Hsp = Hsp90ab1. ( A-C ) Elevation in EdU-based proliferation, transwell invasion, and the upregulation of Lrp5, MMP9, Runx2, TGFβ, and Snail by the overexpression of Eno1, Eef2, and VCL in 4T1.2 tumor cells. ( D ) Decrease in EdU-based proliferation by the administration of Eno1, Eef2, and VCL recombinant proteins. ( E ) Reduction in transwell invasion by the administration of Eno1, Eef2, and VCL recombinant proteins. ( F ) Downregulation of Lrp5, MMP9, Runx2, TGFβ, and Snail in 4T1.2 tumor cells by the administration of Eno1, Eef2, and VCL recombinant proteins. ( G ) Co-immunoprecipitation of CD44 by Eno1 in 4T1.2 cells. ( H-I ) Suppression of the reduction in MTT-based viability by Eno1 in response to the silencing of CD44. ( J ) Downregulation of Lrp5, Runx2, MMP9 and Snail in 4T1.2 cells by the administration of Eno1 recombinant proteins, and the suppression by the silencing of CD44. ( K-L ) Western blotting of wild-type and mutant CD44 proteins, which were pulled down by Halo-tagged Eno1 proteins. PD = pull-down assay, NC = negative control, pl = Eno1 or CD44 proteins from plasmid transfection, MT = mutant CD44 without a cytoplasmic domain, and WT = wild-type CD44.

    Techniques Used: Over Expression, Recombinant, Immunoprecipitation, Western Blot, Mutagenesis, Pull Down Assay, Negative Control, Plasmid Preparation, Transfection

    Downregulation of PDL-1 and Kdm3a in 4T1.2 mammary tumor cells by Hsp90ab1, Eno1, Eef2, and VCL, and the suppression of the development of osteoclasts. CN = control, Hsp = Hsp90ab1, Eno1 = enolase 1, VCL = vinculin, Oct4 = Oct4 plasmids, and CM = conditioned medium. The double asterisk indicates p < 0.01. ( A ) Reduction in the size and weight of mammary tumors by the daily intravenous administration of 1 μg/mL Eno1. EO771 mammary tumor cells were inoculated into the mammary fat pad of C57BL/6 female mice (N = 10). (B) Reduction in p-AKT, NFkB p65, p-ERK, and TNFα in 4T1.2 cells in response to Eno1 recombinant proteins. ( C ) Reduction in PDL1 in 4T1.2 cells by Oct4/cMyc-overexpressing 4T1.2 CM, and Eno1, Hsp, Eef2, and VCL recombinant proteins. ( D ) Reduction in Kdm3a in 4T1.2 cells in response to Eno1, Hsp90ab1, Eef2, and/or VCL recombinant proteins. ( E ) Elevation of Kdm3a in 4T1.2 cells by the overexpression of Eno1, Eef2, and VCL. ( F ) Suppression of RANKL-stimulated osteoclast development by Oct4-overexpressing CM. ( G ) Reduction in the levels of cathepsin K and NFATc1 in RANKL-stimulated osteoclasts by Oct4-overexpressing CM. ( H ) Regulatory mechanism by the tumor-suppressive secretomes, which were derived from Oct4- and c-Myc-overexpressing tumor cells.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Downregulation of PDL-1 and Kdm3a in 4T1.2 mammary tumor cells by Hsp90ab1, Eno1, Eef2, and VCL, and the suppression of the development of osteoclasts. CN = control, Hsp = Hsp90ab1, Eno1 = enolase 1, VCL = vinculin, Oct4 = Oct4 plasmids, and CM = conditioned medium. The double asterisk indicates p < 0.01. ( A ) Reduction in the size and weight of mammary tumors by the daily intravenous administration of 1 μg/mL Eno1. EO771 mammary tumor cells were inoculated into the mammary fat pad of C57BL/6 female mice (N = 10). (B) Reduction in p-AKT, NFkB p65, p-ERK, and TNFα in 4T1.2 cells in response to Eno1 recombinant proteins. ( C ) Reduction in PDL1 in 4T1.2 cells by Oct4/cMyc-overexpressing 4T1.2 CM, and Eno1, Hsp, Eef2, and VCL recombinant proteins. ( D ) Reduction in Kdm3a in 4T1.2 cells in response to Eno1, Hsp90ab1, Eef2, and/or VCL recombinant proteins. ( E ) Elevation of Kdm3a in 4T1.2 cells by the overexpression of Eno1, Eef2, and VCL. ( F ) Suppression of RANKL-stimulated osteoclast development by Oct4-overexpressing CM. ( G ) Reduction in the levels of cathepsin K and NFATc1 in RANKL-stimulated osteoclasts by Oct4-overexpressing CM. ( H ) Regulatory mechanism by the tumor-suppressive secretomes, which were derived from Oct4- and c-Myc-overexpressing tumor cells.

    Techniques Used: Recombinant, Over Expression, Derivative Assay

    anti eno1 antibodies  (Cell Signaling Technology Inc)


    Bioz Verified Symbol Cell Signaling Technology Inc is a verified supplier
    Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Cell Signaling Technology Inc manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 95

    Structured Review

    Cell Signaling Technology Inc anti eno1 antibodies
    Prediction of the tumor suppressors in CM by mass spectrometry-based whole-genome proteomics. The single and double asterisks indicate p < 0.05 and 0.01, respectively. CN = control, Oct4 = Oct4 plasmids, c-Myc = c-Myc plasmids, Sox2 = Sox2 plasmids, Klf4 = Klf4 plasmids, and CM = conditioned medium. ( A ) Summary list of the potential tumor suppressors by mass spectrometry-based whole-genome proteomics. ( B ) <t>Enolase</t> <t>1</t> <t>(Eno1),</t> Hsp90ab1 (HSP), Eef2, and vinculin (VCL) as 4 tumor-suppressor candidates based on MTT-based viability. ( C ) Upregulation of Eno1, Hsp90ab1, Eef2, VCL, p53, and Trail in 4T1.2 cell-derived CM with the overexpression of Oct4, c-Myc, and the treatment with OAC2. The overexpression of Sox2 and Klf4 did not alter their levels. ( D ) Alterations in the levels of Eno1 and Hsp90ab1 in Oct4 and c-Myc CM by ELISA. ( E ) Reduction in MTT-based viability of 4T1.2 cells by the treatment with Eno1 and/or Hsp90ab1 recombinant proteins. ( F ) Tumor selectivity from the MTT-based viability of tumor cells (4T1.2 mammary tumor cells, EO771 mammary tumor cells, and MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells) and human epithelium cells (KTB34-hTERT and KTB22-hTERT). Tumor selectivity is defined as a ratio of (MTT-based reduction in tumor cells) to (MTT-based reduction in non-tumor cells).
    Anti Eno1 Antibodies, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/anti eno1 antibodies/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
    anti eno1 antibodies - by Bioz Stars, 2023-03
    95/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Counterintuitive production of tumor-suppressive secretomes from Oct4- and c-Myc-overexpressing tumor cells and MSCs"

    Article Title: Counterintuitive production of tumor-suppressive secretomes from Oct4- and c-Myc-overexpressing tumor cells and MSCs

    Journal: Theranostics

    doi: 10.7150/thno.70549

    Prediction of the tumor suppressors in CM by mass spectrometry-based whole-genome proteomics. The single and double asterisks indicate p < 0.05 and 0.01, respectively. CN = control, Oct4 = Oct4 plasmids, c-Myc = c-Myc plasmids, Sox2 = Sox2 plasmids, Klf4 = Klf4 plasmids, and CM = conditioned medium. ( A ) Summary list of the potential tumor suppressors by mass spectrometry-based whole-genome proteomics. ( B ) Enolase 1 (Eno1), Hsp90ab1 (HSP), Eef2, and vinculin (VCL) as 4 tumor-suppressor candidates based on MTT-based viability. ( C ) Upregulation of Eno1, Hsp90ab1, Eef2, VCL, p53, and Trail in 4T1.2 cell-derived CM with the overexpression of Oct4, c-Myc, and the treatment with OAC2. The overexpression of Sox2 and Klf4 did not alter their levels. ( D ) Alterations in the levels of Eno1 and Hsp90ab1 in Oct4 and c-Myc CM by ELISA. ( E ) Reduction in MTT-based viability of 4T1.2 cells by the treatment with Eno1 and/or Hsp90ab1 recombinant proteins. ( F ) Tumor selectivity from the MTT-based viability of tumor cells (4T1.2 mammary tumor cells, EO771 mammary tumor cells, and MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells) and human epithelium cells (KTB34-hTERT and KTB22-hTERT). Tumor selectivity is defined as a ratio of (MTT-based reduction in tumor cells) to (MTT-based reduction in non-tumor cells).
    Figure Legend Snippet: Prediction of the tumor suppressors in CM by mass spectrometry-based whole-genome proteomics. The single and double asterisks indicate p < 0.05 and 0.01, respectively. CN = control, Oct4 = Oct4 plasmids, c-Myc = c-Myc plasmids, Sox2 = Sox2 plasmids, Klf4 = Klf4 plasmids, and CM = conditioned medium. ( A ) Summary list of the potential tumor suppressors by mass spectrometry-based whole-genome proteomics. ( B ) Enolase 1 (Eno1), Hsp90ab1 (HSP), Eef2, and vinculin (VCL) as 4 tumor-suppressor candidates based on MTT-based viability. ( C ) Upregulation of Eno1, Hsp90ab1, Eef2, VCL, p53, and Trail in 4T1.2 cell-derived CM with the overexpression of Oct4, c-Myc, and the treatment with OAC2. The overexpression of Sox2 and Klf4 did not alter their levels. ( D ) Alterations in the levels of Eno1 and Hsp90ab1 in Oct4 and c-Myc CM by ELISA. ( E ) Reduction in MTT-based viability of 4T1.2 cells by the treatment with Eno1 and/or Hsp90ab1 recombinant proteins. ( F ) Tumor selectivity from the MTT-based viability of tumor cells (4T1.2 mammary tumor cells, EO771 mammary tumor cells, and MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells) and human epithelium cells (KTB34-hTERT and KTB22-hTERT). Tumor selectivity is defined as a ratio of (MTT-based reduction in tumor cells) to (MTT-based reduction in non-tumor cells).

    Techniques Used: Mass Spectrometry, Derivative Assay, Over Expression, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Recombinant

    Tumor-promoting effects by the overexpression of Eno1, Eef2, and VCL in 4T1.2 mammary tumor cells, and tumor-suppressing effects by the administration of their recombinant proteins. The double asterisk indicates p < 0.01. CN = control, Eno1 = enolase 1, VCL = vinculin, and Hsp = Hsp90ab1. ( A-C ) Elevation in EdU-based proliferation, transwell invasion, and the upregulation of Lrp5, MMP9, Runx2, TGFβ, and Snail by the overexpression of Eno1, Eef2, and VCL in 4T1.2 tumor cells. ( D ) Decrease in EdU-based proliferation by the administration of Eno1, Eef2, and VCL recombinant proteins. ( E ) Reduction in transwell invasion by the administration of Eno1, Eef2, and VCL recombinant proteins. ( F ) Downregulation of Lrp5, MMP9, Runx2, TGFβ, and Snail in 4T1.2 tumor cells by the administration of Eno1, Eef2, and VCL recombinant proteins. ( G ) Co-immunoprecipitation of CD44 by Eno1 in 4T1.2 cells. ( H-I ) Suppression of the reduction in MTT-based viability by Eno1 in response to the silencing of CD44. ( J ) Downregulation of Lrp5, Runx2, MMP9 and Snail in 4T1.2 cells by the administration of Eno1 recombinant proteins, and the suppression by the silencing of CD44. ( K-L ) Western blotting of wild-type and mutant CD44 proteins, which were pulled down by Halo-tagged Eno1 proteins. PD = pull-down assay, NC = negative control, pl = Eno1 or CD44 proteins from plasmid transfection, MT = mutant CD44 without a cytoplasmic domain, and WT = wild-type CD44.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Tumor-promoting effects by the overexpression of Eno1, Eef2, and VCL in 4T1.2 mammary tumor cells, and tumor-suppressing effects by the administration of their recombinant proteins. The double asterisk indicates p < 0.01. CN = control, Eno1 = enolase 1, VCL = vinculin, and Hsp = Hsp90ab1. ( A-C ) Elevation in EdU-based proliferation, transwell invasion, and the upregulation of Lrp5, MMP9, Runx2, TGFβ, and Snail by the overexpression of Eno1, Eef2, and VCL in 4T1.2 tumor cells. ( D ) Decrease in EdU-based proliferation by the administration of Eno1, Eef2, and VCL recombinant proteins. ( E ) Reduction in transwell invasion by the administration of Eno1, Eef2, and VCL recombinant proteins. ( F ) Downregulation of Lrp5, MMP9, Runx2, TGFβ, and Snail in 4T1.2 tumor cells by the administration of Eno1, Eef2, and VCL recombinant proteins. ( G ) Co-immunoprecipitation of CD44 by Eno1 in 4T1.2 cells. ( H-I ) Suppression of the reduction in MTT-based viability by Eno1 in response to the silencing of CD44. ( J ) Downregulation of Lrp5, Runx2, MMP9 and Snail in 4T1.2 cells by the administration of Eno1 recombinant proteins, and the suppression by the silencing of CD44. ( K-L ) Western blotting of wild-type and mutant CD44 proteins, which were pulled down by Halo-tagged Eno1 proteins. PD = pull-down assay, NC = negative control, pl = Eno1 or CD44 proteins from plasmid transfection, MT = mutant CD44 without a cytoplasmic domain, and WT = wild-type CD44.

    Techniques Used: Over Expression, Recombinant, Immunoprecipitation, Western Blot, Mutagenesis, Pull Down Assay, Negative Control, Plasmid Preparation, Transfection

    Downregulation of PDL-1 and Kdm3a in 4T1.2 mammary tumor cells by Hsp90ab1, Eno1, Eef2, and VCL, and the suppression of the development of osteoclasts. CN = control, Hsp = Hsp90ab1, Eno1 = enolase 1, VCL = vinculin, Oct4 = Oct4 plasmids, and CM = conditioned medium. The double asterisk indicates p < 0.01. ( A ) Reduction in the size and weight of mammary tumors by the daily intravenous administration of 1 μg/mL Eno1. EO771 mammary tumor cells were inoculated into the mammary fat pad of C57BL/6 female mice (N = 10). (B) Reduction in p-AKT, NFkB p65, p-ERK, and TNFα in 4T1.2 cells in response to Eno1 recombinant proteins. ( C ) Reduction in PDL1 in 4T1.2 cells by Oct4/cMyc-overexpressing 4T1.2 CM, and Eno1, Hsp, Eef2, and VCL recombinant proteins. ( D ) Reduction in Kdm3a in 4T1.2 cells in response to Eno1, Hsp90ab1, Eef2, and/or VCL recombinant proteins. ( E ) Elevation of Kdm3a in 4T1.2 cells by the overexpression of Eno1, Eef2, and VCL. ( F ) Suppression of RANKL-stimulated osteoclast development by Oct4-overexpressing CM. ( G ) Reduction in the levels of cathepsin K and NFATc1 in RANKL-stimulated osteoclasts by Oct4-overexpressing CM. ( H ) Regulatory mechanism by the tumor-suppressive secretomes, which were derived from Oct4- and c-Myc-overexpressing tumor cells.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Downregulation of PDL-1 and Kdm3a in 4T1.2 mammary tumor cells by Hsp90ab1, Eno1, Eef2, and VCL, and the suppression of the development of osteoclasts. CN = control, Hsp = Hsp90ab1, Eno1 = enolase 1, VCL = vinculin, Oct4 = Oct4 plasmids, and CM = conditioned medium. The double asterisk indicates p < 0.01. ( A ) Reduction in the size and weight of mammary tumors by the daily intravenous administration of 1 μg/mL Eno1. EO771 mammary tumor cells were inoculated into the mammary fat pad of C57BL/6 female mice (N = 10). (B) Reduction in p-AKT, NFkB p65, p-ERK, and TNFα in 4T1.2 cells in response to Eno1 recombinant proteins. ( C ) Reduction in PDL1 in 4T1.2 cells by Oct4/cMyc-overexpressing 4T1.2 CM, and Eno1, Hsp, Eef2, and VCL recombinant proteins. ( D ) Reduction in Kdm3a in 4T1.2 cells in response to Eno1, Hsp90ab1, Eef2, and/or VCL recombinant proteins. ( E ) Elevation of Kdm3a in 4T1.2 cells by the overexpression of Eno1, Eef2, and VCL. ( F ) Suppression of RANKL-stimulated osteoclast development by Oct4-overexpressing CM. ( G ) Reduction in the levels of cathepsin K and NFATc1 in RANKL-stimulated osteoclasts by Oct4-overexpressing CM. ( H ) Regulatory mechanism by the tumor-suppressive secretomes, which were derived from Oct4- and c-Myc-overexpressing tumor cells.

    Techniques Used: Recombinant, Over Expression, Derivative Assay

    antibodies against eno1  (Cell Signaling Technology Inc)


    Bioz Verified Symbol Cell Signaling Technology Inc is a verified supplier
    Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Cell Signaling Technology Inc manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 95

    Structured Review

    Cell Signaling Technology Inc antibodies against eno1
    Prediction of the tumor suppressors in CM by mass spectrometry-based whole-genome proteomics. The single and double asterisks indicate p < 0.05 and 0.01, respectively. CN = control, Oct4 = Oct4 plasmids, c-Myc = c-Myc plasmids, Sox2 = Sox2 plasmids, Klf4 = Klf4 plasmids, and CM = conditioned medium. ( A ) Summary list of the potential tumor suppressors by mass spectrometry-based whole-genome proteomics. ( B ) <t>Enolase</t> <t>1</t> <t>(Eno1),</t> Hsp90ab1 (HSP), Eef2, and vinculin (VCL) as 4 tumor-suppressor candidates based on MTT-based viability. ( C ) Upregulation of Eno1, Hsp90ab1, Eef2, VCL, p53, and Trail in 4T1.2 cell-derived CM with the overexpression of Oct4, c-Myc, and the treatment with OAC2. The overexpression of Sox2 and Klf4 did not alter their levels. ( D ) Alterations in the levels of Eno1 and Hsp90ab1 in Oct4 and c-Myc CM by ELISA. ( E ) Reduction in MTT-based viability of 4T1.2 cells by the treatment with Eno1 and/or Hsp90ab1 recombinant proteins. ( F ) Tumor selectivity from the MTT-based viability of tumor cells (4T1.2 mammary tumor cells, EO771 mammary tumor cells, and MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells) and human epithelium cells (KTB34-hTERT and KTB22-hTERT). Tumor selectivity is defined as a ratio of (MTT-based reduction in tumor cells) to (MTT-based reduction in non-tumor cells).
    Antibodies Against Eno1, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/antibodies against eno1/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
    antibodies against eno1 - by Bioz Stars, 2023-03
    95/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Counterintuitive production of tumor-suppressive secretomes from Oct4- and c-Myc-overexpressing tumor cells and MSCs"

    Article Title: Counterintuitive production of tumor-suppressive secretomes from Oct4- and c-Myc-overexpressing tumor cells and MSCs

    Journal: Theranostics

    doi: 10.7150/thno.70549

    Prediction of the tumor suppressors in CM by mass spectrometry-based whole-genome proteomics. The single and double asterisks indicate p < 0.05 and 0.01, respectively. CN = control, Oct4 = Oct4 plasmids, c-Myc = c-Myc plasmids, Sox2 = Sox2 plasmids, Klf4 = Klf4 plasmids, and CM = conditioned medium. ( A ) Summary list of the potential tumor suppressors by mass spectrometry-based whole-genome proteomics. ( B ) Enolase 1 (Eno1), Hsp90ab1 (HSP), Eef2, and vinculin (VCL) as 4 tumor-suppressor candidates based on MTT-based viability. ( C ) Upregulation of Eno1, Hsp90ab1, Eef2, VCL, p53, and Trail in 4T1.2 cell-derived CM with the overexpression of Oct4, c-Myc, and the treatment with OAC2. The overexpression of Sox2 and Klf4 did not alter their levels. ( D ) Alterations in the levels of Eno1 and Hsp90ab1 in Oct4 and c-Myc CM by ELISA. ( E ) Reduction in MTT-based viability of 4T1.2 cells by the treatment with Eno1 and/or Hsp90ab1 recombinant proteins. ( F ) Tumor selectivity from the MTT-based viability of tumor cells (4T1.2 mammary tumor cells, EO771 mammary tumor cells, and MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells) and human epithelium cells (KTB34-hTERT and KTB22-hTERT). Tumor selectivity is defined as a ratio of (MTT-based reduction in tumor cells) to (MTT-based reduction in non-tumor cells).
    Figure Legend Snippet: Prediction of the tumor suppressors in CM by mass spectrometry-based whole-genome proteomics. The single and double asterisks indicate p < 0.05 and 0.01, respectively. CN = control, Oct4 = Oct4 plasmids, c-Myc = c-Myc plasmids, Sox2 = Sox2 plasmids, Klf4 = Klf4 plasmids, and CM = conditioned medium. ( A ) Summary list of the potential tumor suppressors by mass spectrometry-based whole-genome proteomics. ( B ) Enolase 1 (Eno1), Hsp90ab1 (HSP), Eef2, and vinculin (VCL) as 4 tumor-suppressor candidates based on MTT-based viability. ( C ) Upregulation of Eno1, Hsp90ab1, Eef2, VCL, p53, and Trail in 4T1.2 cell-derived CM with the overexpression of Oct4, c-Myc, and the treatment with OAC2. The overexpression of Sox2 and Klf4 did not alter their levels. ( D ) Alterations in the levels of Eno1 and Hsp90ab1 in Oct4 and c-Myc CM by ELISA. ( E ) Reduction in MTT-based viability of 4T1.2 cells by the treatment with Eno1 and/or Hsp90ab1 recombinant proteins. ( F ) Tumor selectivity from the MTT-based viability of tumor cells (4T1.2 mammary tumor cells, EO771 mammary tumor cells, and MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells) and human epithelium cells (KTB34-hTERT and KTB22-hTERT). Tumor selectivity is defined as a ratio of (MTT-based reduction in tumor cells) to (MTT-based reduction in non-tumor cells).

    Techniques Used: Mass Spectrometry, Derivative Assay, Over Expression, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Recombinant

    Tumor-promoting effects by the overexpression of Eno1, Eef2, and VCL in 4T1.2 mammary tumor cells, and tumor-suppressing effects by the administration of their recombinant proteins. The double asterisk indicates p < 0.01. CN = control, Eno1 = enolase 1, VCL = vinculin, and Hsp = Hsp90ab1. ( A-C ) Elevation in EdU-based proliferation, transwell invasion, and the upregulation of Lrp5, MMP9, Runx2, TGFβ, and Snail by the overexpression of Eno1, Eef2, and VCL in 4T1.2 tumor cells. ( D ) Decrease in EdU-based proliferation by the administration of Eno1, Eef2, and VCL recombinant proteins. ( E ) Reduction in transwell invasion by the administration of Eno1, Eef2, and VCL recombinant proteins. ( F ) Downregulation of Lrp5, MMP9, Runx2, TGFβ, and Snail in 4T1.2 tumor cells by the administration of Eno1, Eef2, and VCL recombinant proteins. ( G ) Co-immunoprecipitation of CD44 by Eno1 in 4T1.2 cells. ( H-I ) Suppression of the reduction in MTT-based viability by Eno1 in response to the silencing of CD44. ( J ) Downregulation of Lrp5, Runx2, MMP9 and Snail in 4T1.2 cells by the administration of Eno1 recombinant proteins, and the suppression by the silencing of CD44. ( K-L ) Western blotting of wild-type and mutant CD44 proteins, which were pulled down by Halo-tagged Eno1 proteins. PD = pull-down assay, NC = negative control, pl = Eno1 or CD44 proteins from plasmid transfection, MT = mutant CD44 without a cytoplasmic domain, and WT = wild-type CD44.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Tumor-promoting effects by the overexpression of Eno1, Eef2, and VCL in 4T1.2 mammary tumor cells, and tumor-suppressing effects by the administration of their recombinant proteins. The double asterisk indicates p < 0.01. CN = control, Eno1 = enolase 1, VCL = vinculin, and Hsp = Hsp90ab1. ( A-C ) Elevation in EdU-based proliferation, transwell invasion, and the upregulation of Lrp5, MMP9, Runx2, TGFβ, and Snail by the overexpression of Eno1, Eef2, and VCL in 4T1.2 tumor cells. ( D ) Decrease in EdU-based proliferation by the administration of Eno1, Eef2, and VCL recombinant proteins. ( E ) Reduction in transwell invasion by the administration of Eno1, Eef2, and VCL recombinant proteins. ( F ) Downregulation of Lrp5, MMP9, Runx2, TGFβ, and Snail in 4T1.2 tumor cells by the administration of Eno1, Eef2, and VCL recombinant proteins. ( G ) Co-immunoprecipitation of CD44 by Eno1 in 4T1.2 cells. ( H-I ) Suppression of the reduction in MTT-based viability by Eno1 in response to the silencing of CD44. ( J ) Downregulation of Lrp5, Runx2, MMP9 and Snail in 4T1.2 cells by the administration of Eno1 recombinant proteins, and the suppression by the silencing of CD44. ( K-L ) Western blotting of wild-type and mutant CD44 proteins, which were pulled down by Halo-tagged Eno1 proteins. PD = pull-down assay, NC = negative control, pl = Eno1 or CD44 proteins from plasmid transfection, MT = mutant CD44 without a cytoplasmic domain, and WT = wild-type CD44.

    Techniques Used: Over Expression, Recombinant, Immunoprecipitation, Western Blot, Mutagenesis, Pull Down Assay, Negative Control, Plasmid Preparation, Transfection

    Downregulation of PDL-1 and Kdm3a in 4T1.2 mammary tumor cells by Hsp90ab1, Eno1, Eef2, and VCL, and the suppression of the development of osteoclasts. CN = control, Hsp = Hsp90ab1, Eno1 = enolase 1, VCL = vinculin, Oct4 = Oct4 plasmids, and CM = conditioned medium. The double asterisk indicates p < 0.01. ( A ) Reduction in the size and weight of mammary tumors by the daily intravenous administration of 1 μg/mL Eno1. EO771 mammary tumor cells were inoculated into the mammary fat pad of C57BL/6 female mice (N = 10). (B) Reduction in p-AKT, NFkB p65, p-ERK, and TNFα in 4T1.2 cells in response to Eno1 recombinant proteins. ( C ) Reduction in PDL1 in 4T1.2 cells by Oct4/cMyc-overexpressing 4T1.2 CM, and Eno1, Hsp, Eef2, and VCL recombinant proteins. ( D ) Reduction in Kdm3a in 4T1.2 cells in response to Eno1, Hsp90ab1, Eef2, and/or VCL recombinant proteins. ( E ) Elevation of Kdm3a in 4T1.2 cells by the overexpression of Eno1, Eef2, and VCL. ( F ) Suppression of RANKL-stimulated osteoclast development by Oct4-overexpressing CM. ( G ) Reduction in the levels of cathepsin K and NFATc1 in RANKL-stimulated osteoclasts by Oct4-overexpressing CM. ( H ) Regulatory mechanism by the tumor-suppressive secretomes, which were derived from Oct4- and c-Myc-overexpressing tumor cells.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Downregulation of PDL-1 and Kdm3a in 4T1.2 mammary tumor cells by Hsp90ab1, Eno1, Eef2, and VCL, and the suppression of the development of osteoclasts. CN = control, Hsp = Hsp90ab1, Eno1 = enolase 1, VCL = vinculin, Oct4 = Oct4 plasmids, and CM = conditioned medium. The double asterisk indicates p < 0.01. ( A ) Reduction in the size and weight of mammary tumors by the daily intravenous administration of 1 μg/mL Eno1. EO771 mammary tumor cells were inoculated into the mammary fat pad of C57BL/6 female mice (N = 10). (B) Reduction in p-AKT, NFkB p65, p-ERK, and TNFα in 4T1.2 cells in response to Eno1 recombinant proteins. ( C ) Reduction in PDL1 in 4T1.2 cells by Oct4/cMyc-overexpressing 4T1.2 CM, and Eno1, Hsp, Eef2, and VCL recombinant proteins. ( D ) Reduction in Kdm3a in 4T1.2 cells in response to Eno1, Hsp90ab1, Eef2, and/or VCL recombinant proteins. ( E ) Elevation of Kdm3a in 4T1.2 cells by the overexpression of Eno1, Eef2, and VCL. ( F ) Suppression of RANKL-stimulated osteoclast development by Oct4-overexpressing CM. ( G ) Reduction in the levels of cathepsin K and NFATc1 in RANKL-stimulated osteoclasts by Oct4-overexpressing CM. ( H ) Regulatory mechanism by the tumor-suppressive secretomes, which were derived from Oct4- and c-Myc-overexpressing tumor cells.

    Techniques Used: Recombinant, Over Expression, Derivative Assay

    eno1  (Cell Signaling Technology Inc)


    Bioz Verified Symbol Cell Signaling Technology Inc is a verified supplier
    Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Cell Signaling Technology Inc manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 95

    Structured Review

    Cell Signaling Technology Inc eno1
    Mass spectrometry-based prediction of tumor suppressors and the effect of <t>enolase</t> <t>1</t> and ubiquitin C. EO = EO771 mammary tumor cells, CM = conditioned medium, CN = control (no CM treatment), β-cat = β-catenin plasmids, BML = BML284, <t>Eno1</t> = Enolase 1, and Ubc = ubiquitin C. The single and double asterisks indicate p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively. (A) List of 25 top tumor suppressor candidates identified by mass spectrometry-based proteomics analysis. (B) Reduction in MTT-based proliferation of EO771 mammary tumor cells by 9 recombinant proteins (5 μg/mL) in 48 h. (C) Levels of enolase 1 and ubiquitin C in β-catenin-overexpressing and BML284-treated EO771 CMs by ELISA. (D) Inhibition in the scratch-based migration of EO771 mammary tumor cells by enolase 1 and ubiquitin C in 24 h. (E) Expression of β-catenin and enolase 1 in EO771 cells that were treated with AP-Ⅲ-a4, an inhibitor of enolase 1. (F&G) Repressive effects of AP-Ⅲ-a4 on the proliferation (in 48 h) and migration of EO771 cells (in 24 h) by β-catenin overexpressing iTS CM.
    Eno1, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/eno1/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
    eno1 - by Bioz Stars, 2023-03
    95/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Generation of the tumor-suppressive secretome from tumor cells"

    Article Title: Generation of the tumor-suppressive secretome from tumor cells

    Journal: Theranostics

    doi: 10.7150/thno.61006

    Mass spectrometry-based prediction of tumor suppressors and the effect of enolase 1 and ubiquitin C. EO = EO771 mammary tumor cells, CM = conditioned medium, CN = control (no CM treatment), β-cat = β-catenin plasmids, BML = BML284, Eno1 = Enolase 1, and Ubc = ubiquitin C. The single and double asterisks indicate p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively. (A) List of 25 top tumor suppressor candidates identified by mass spectrometry-based proteomics analysis. (B) Reduction in MTT-based proliferation of EO771 mammary tumor cells by 9 recombinant proteins (5 μg/mL) in 48 h. (C) Levels of enolase 1 and ubiquitin C in β-catenin-overexpressing and BML284-treated EO771 CMs by ELISA. (D) Inhibition in the scratch-based migration of EO771 mammary tumor cells by enolase 1 and ubiquitin C in 24 h. (E) Expression of β-catenin and enolase 1 in EO771 cells that were treated with AP-Ⅲ-a4, an inhibitor of enolase 1. (F&G) Repressive effects of AP-Ⅲ-a4 on the proliferation (in 48 h) and migration of EO771 cells (in 24 h) by β-catenin overexpressing iTS CM.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Mass spectrometry-based prediction of tumor suppressors and the effect of enolase 1 and ubiquitin C. EO = EO771 mammary tumor cells, CM = conditioned medium, CN = control (no CM treatment), β-cat = β-catenin plasmids, BML = BML284, Eno1 = Enolase 1, and Ubc = ubiquitin C. The single and double asterisks indicate p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively. (A) List of 25 top tumor suppressor candidates identified by mass spectrometry-based proteomics analysis. (B) Reduction in MTT-based proliferation of EO771 mammary tumor cells by 9 recombinant proteins (5 μg/mL) in 48 h. (C) Levels of enolase 1 and ubiquitin C in β-catenin-overexpressing and BML284-treated EO771 CMs by ELISA. (D) Inhibition in the scratch-based migration of EO771 mammary tumor cells by enolase 1 and ubiquitin C in 24 h. (E) Expression of β-catenin and enolase 1 in EO771 cells that were treated with AP-Ⅲ-a4, an inhibitor of enolase 1. (F&G) Repressive effects of AP-Ⅲ-a4 on the proliferation (in 48 h) and migration of EO771 cells (in 24 h) by β-catenin overexpressing iTS CM.

    Techniques Used: Mass Spectrometry, Recombinant, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Inhibition, Migration, Expressing

    Effect of silencing enolase 1 and ubiquitin C. CM = conditioned medium, CN = control (no CM treatment), β-cat = β-catenin plasmids, siEno1 = Enolase 1 siRNA, siUbc = ubiquitin C siRNA, EO = EO771 mammary tumor cells, TR = TRAMP prostate cancer cells, and PA = PANC-1 pancreas cancer cells. The double asterisk indicates p < 0.01. (A) siRNA-mediated knockdown of enolase 1, and ubiquitin C in EO771 breast cancer cells. (B&C) Promotion of MTT-based proliferation, and scratch-based migration of EO771 breast cancer cells by enolase 1 and ubiquitin C siRNA-treated CMs in 2 days. (D-I) Effects of enolase 1 and ubiquitin C siRNAs. Silencing these two proteins significantly prevented the reduction in EdU-based proliferation and Transwell invasion of EO771, TRAMP, and PANC-1 cells by their own β-catenin-overexpressing iTS CMs in 2 days.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Effect of silencing enolase 1 and ubiquitin C. CM = conditioned medium, CN = control (no CM treatment), β-cat = β-catenin plasmids, siEno1 = Enolase 1 siRNA, siUbc = ubiquitin C siRNA, EO = EO771 mammary tumor cells, TR = TRAMP prostate cancer cells, and PA = PANC-1 pancreas cancer cells. The double asterisk indicates p < 0.01. (A) siRNA-mediated knockdown of enolase 1, and ubiquitin C in EO771 breast cancer cells. (B&C) Promotion of MTT-based proliferation, and scratch-based migration of EO771 breast cancer cells by enolase 1 and ubiquitin C siRNA-treated CMs in 2 days. (D-I) Effects of enolase 1 and ubiquitin C siRNAs. Silencing these two proteins significantly prevented the reduction in EdU-based proliferation and Transwell invasion of EO771, TRAMP, and PANC-1 cells by their own β-catenin-overexpressing iTS CMs in 2 days.

    Techniques Used: Migration

    Tumor selectivity and the involvement of CD44. A5 = MLO-A5 osteocytes, β-cat = β-catenin plasmids, BML = BML284, Eno1 = Enolase 1, Ubc = ubiquitin C. The signal and double asterisk indicates p < 0.01 and p < 0.05, respectively. (A) Comparison of MTT-based viability of four non-tumor cells (KTB34, KTB6, MC3T3, MSC) and four tumor cells (EO771, TRAMP, 4T1.2, PANC-1) in response to β-catenin-iTS CM and BML-iTS CM in 2 days. (B) Tumor selectivity of EO771 CM, 4T1.2 CM, TRAMP CM, and PANC-1 CM. MTT-based tumor selectivity is defined as the ratio of (reduction in tumor cells) to (reduction in non-tumor cells). The selectivity value above 1 indicates that MTT-based inhibition is more selective to tumor cells than non-tumor cells. Of note, N.D. = not defined since the viability of non-tumor cells is stimulated. (C&D) Tumor selectivity of Enolase 1 and ubiquitin C. (E) CD44 was co-immunoprecipitated with Eno1. The protein extracts of EO771 cells were incubated with anti-Eno1 antibody using the protein A/G beads. Immunoprecipitates and total cell lysates were analyzed by Western blotting with anti-CD44 and anti-Eno1 antibodies as indicated. (F&G) siRNA knockdown of CD44 suppressed Eno1-mediated inhibition of the proliferation of EO771 cells. (H) siRNA knockdown of CD44 suppressed Eno1-mediated downregulation of MMP9, Runx2, and Snail in EO771 cells.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Tumor selectivity and the involvement of CD44. A5 = MLO-A5 osteocytes, β-cat = β-catenin plasmids, BML = BML284, Eno1 = Enolase 1, Ubc = ubiquitin C. The signal and double asterisk indicates p < 0.01 and p < 0.05, respectively. (A) Comparison of MTT-based viability of four non-tumor cells (KTB34, KTB6, MC3T3, MSC) and four tumor cells (EO771, TRAMP, 4T1.2, PANC-1) in response to β-catenin-iTS CM and BML-iTS CM in 2 days. (B) Tumor selectivity of EO771 CM, 4T1.2 CM, TRAMP CM, and PANC-1 CM. MTT-based tumor selectivity is defined as the ratio of (reduction in tumor cells) to (reduction in non-tumor cells). The selectivity value above 1 indicates that MTT-based inhibition is more selective to tumor cells than non-tumor cells. Of note, N.D. = not defined since the viability of non-tumor cells is stimulated. (C&D) Tumor selectivity of Enolase 1 and ubiquitin C. (E) CD44 was co-immunoprecipitated with Eno1. The protein extracts of EO771 cells were incubated with anti-Eno1 antibody using the protein A/G beads. Immunoprecipitates and total cell lysates were analyzed by Western blotting with anti-CD44 and anti-Eno1 antibodies as indicated. (F&G) siRNA knockdown of CD44 suppressed Eno1-mediated inhibition of the proliferation of EO771 cells. (H) siRNA knockdown of CD44 suppressed Eno1-mediated downregulation of MMP9, Runx2, and Snail in EO771 cells.

    Techniques Used: Inhibition, Immunoprecipitation, Incubation, Western Blot

    Effects of enolase 1, ubiquitin C, and iTS CM on the expression of tumor-promoting and tumor-suppressing genes. CM = conditioned medium, CN = control (no CM treatment), β-cat = β-catenin plasmids, siEno1 = Enolase 1 siRNA, siUbc = ubiquitin C siRNA, EO = EO771 mammary tumor cells. (A&B) Expression of MMP9, Runx2, Snail, p53, and TRAIL in response to enolase 1 and ubiquitin C in EO771 breast cancer cells. (C&D) Expression of MMP9, Runx2, Snail, p53, and TRAIL in response to β-catenin-overexpressing iTS CM impaired by siRNAs specific to enolase 1 and ubiquitin C. (E) Expression of PDL1 in EO771 mammary tumor cells in response to β-catenin-overexpressing iTS CM, enolase 1, and ubiquitin C. (F&G) Expression of MMP9, Runx2, Snail, p53, TRAIL, and caspase 3 in EO771 mammary tumor cells in response to β-catenin-overexpressing pre-treatment tumor cell-derived CM. (H) Low survival for cancer patients with a high transcript level of MMP9, Runx2, or Snail. (I) Proposed regulatory mechanism to inhibit tumor progression by iTS-CM. According to the mechanism, β-catenin-overexpressing iTS cells secrete ubiquitin C (Ubc), enolase 1 (Eno1), p53, and Trail. They suppress the progression of tumor cells by downregulating MMP9, Runx2, Snail, and PDL1, while upregulating cleaved-caspase 3. It should be noted that Eno1 interacts with CD44 and inhibits MMP9, Runx2, and Snail.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Effects of enolase 1, ubiquitin C, and iTS CM on the expression of tumor-promoting and tumor-suppressing genes. CM = conditioned medium, CN = control (no CM treatment), β-cat = β-catenin plasmids, siEno1 = Enolase 1 siRNA, siUbc = ubiquitin C siRNA, EO = EO771 mammary tumor cells. (A&B) Expression of MMP9, Runx2, Snail, p53, and TRAIL in response to enolase 1 and ubiquitin C in EO771 breast cancer cells. (C&D) Expression of MMP9, Runx2, Snail, p53, and TRAIL in response to β-catenin-overexpressing iTS CM impaired by siRNAs specific to enolase 1 and ubiquitin C. (E) Expression of PDL1 in EO771 mammary tumor cells in response to β-catenin-overexpressing iTS CM, enolase 1, and ubiquitin C. (F&G) Expression of MMP9, Runx2, Snail, p53, TRAIL, and caspase 3 in EO771 mammary tumor cells in response to β-catenin-overexpressing pre-treatment tumor cell-derived CM. (H) Low survival for cancer patients with a high transcript level of MMP9, Runx2, or Snail. (I) Proposed regulatory mechanism to inhibit tumor progression by iTS-CM. According to the mechanism, β-catenin-overexpressing iTS cells secrete ubiquitin C (Ubc), enolase 1 (Eno1), p53, and Trail. They suppress the progression of tumor cells by downregulating MMP9, Runx2, Snail, and PDL1, while upregulating cleaved-caspase 3. It should be noted that Eno1 interacts with CD44 and inhibits MMP9, Runx2, and Snail.

    Techniques Used: Expressing, Derivative Assay

    eno1  (Cell Signaling Technology Inc)


    Bioz Verified Symbol Cell Signaling Technology Inc is a verified supplier
    Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Cell Signaling Technology Inc manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 95

    Structured Review

    Cell Signaling Technology Inc eno1
    Liver lysosomes of fed Snell mice show more uptake of CMA substrates than lysosomes from littermate controls. (A) Representative western blots of liver lysosomes from control (C) and Snell (S) mice 2 h after treatments with leupeptin (100 mg/kg body weight) or PBS vehicle control. (B-D) Quantifications of the abundance of CMA substrates GAPDH, <t>ENO1,</t> and ACADL in lysosomes shown in (A). (E) Quantification of PPID, endosomal microautophagy substrate. (F) Quantification of HSPA8, CMA chaperone. (G) Representative western blots for binding and uptake assays for CMA substrate GAPDH, quantified in (H). (I) Representative western blots for binding and uptake assays for CMA substrate MAPT, quantified in (J). For (B-F), n = 9 of each treatment group, 2-way ANOVA results are reported below each bar graph. Comparisons plotted on the bar graphs are results of Student’s t-test. For (H & J), n = 6 of each treatment group, the results of Student’s t-test are shown on the graphs. Error bars are S.E.M
    Eno1, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/eno1/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
    eno1 - by Bioz Stars, 2023-03
    95/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Long-lived mice with reduced growth hormone signaling have a constitutive upregulation of hepatic chaperone-mediated autophagy"

    Article Title: Long-lived mice with reduced growth hormone signaling have a constitutive upregulation of hepatic chaperone-mediated autophagy

    Journal: Autophagy

    doi: 10.1080/15548627.2020.1725378

    Liver lysosomes of fed Snell mice show more uptake of CMA substrates than lysosomes from littermate controls. (A) Representative western blots of liver lysosomes from control (C) and Snell (S) mice 2 h after treatments with leupeptin (100 mg/kg body weight) or PBS vehicle control. (B-D) Quantifications of the abundance of CMA substrates GAPDH, ENO1, and ACADL in lysosomes shown in (A). (E) Quantification of PPID, endosomal microautophagy substrate. (F) Quantification of HSPA8, CMA chaperone. (G) Representative western blots for binding and uptake assays for CMA substrate GAPDH, quantified in (H). (I) Representative western blots for binding and uptake assays for CMA substrate MAPT, quantified in (J). For (B-F), n = 9 of each treatment group, 2-way ANOVA results are reported below each bar graph. Comparisons plotted on the bar graphs are results of Student’s t-test. For (H & J), n = 6 of each treatment group, the results of Student’s t-test are shown on the graphs. Error bars are S.E.M
    Figure Legend Snippet: Liver lysosomes of fed Snell mice show more uptake of CMA substrates than lysosomes from littermate controls. (A) Representative western blots of liver lysosomes from control (C) and Snell (S) mice 2 h after treatments with leupeptin (100 mg/kg body weight) or PBS vehicle control. (B-D) Quantifications of the abundance of CMA substrates GAPDH, ENO1, and ACADL in lysosomes shown in (A). (E) Quantification of PPID, endosomal microautophagy substrate. (F) Quantification of HSPA8, CMA chaperone. (G) Representative western blots for binding and uptake assays for CMA substrate GAPDH, quantified in (H). (I) Representative western blots for binding and uptake assays for CMA substrate MAPT, quantified in (J). For (B-F), n = 9 of each treatment group, 2-way ANOVA results are reported below each bar graph. Comparisons plotted on the bar graphs are results of Student’s t-test. For (H & J), n = 6 of each treatment group, the results of Student’s t-test are shown on the graphs. Error bars are S.E.M

    Techniques Used: Western Blot, Binding Assay

    Liver lysosomes of fed ghr KO mice show more uptake of CMA substrates than lysosomes from littermate controls. (A) Representative western blots of liver lysosomes from control (C) and ghr KO (KO) mice 2 h after treatments with leupeptin (100 mg/kg body weight) or PBS vehicle control. (B-D) Quantifications of the abundance of CMA substrates GAPDH, ENO1, and ACADL in lysosomes shown in (A). (E) Quantification of PPID, endosomal microautophagy substrate. (F) Quantification of HSPA8, CMA chaperone. (G) Representative western blots for binding and uptake assays for CMA substrate MAPT, quantified in (H). For (B-F), n = 6 of each treatment group, 2-way ANOVA results are reported below each bar graph. Comparisons plotted on the bar graphs are results of Student’s t-test. For (H), n = 6 of each treatment group; the results of Student’s t-test are shown on the graphs. Error bars are S.E.M
    Figure Legend Snippet: Liver lysosomes of fed ghr KO mice show more uptake of CMA substrates than lysosomes from littermate controls. (A) Representative western blots of liver lysosomes from control (C) and ghr KO (KO) mice 2 h after treatments with leupeptin (100 mg/kg body weight) or PBS vehicle control. (B-D) Quantifications of the abundance of CMA substrates GAPDH, ENO1, and ACADL in lysosomes shown in (A). (E) Quantification of PPID, endosomal microautophagy substrate. (F) Quantification of HSPA8, CMA chaperone. (G) Representative western blots for binding and uptake assays for CMA substrate MAPT, quantified in (H). For (B-F), n = 6 of each treatment group, 2-way ANOVA results are reported below each bar graph. Comparisons plotted on the bar graphs are results of Student’s t-test. For (H), n = 6 of each treatment group; the results of Student’s t-test are shown on the graphs. Error bars are S.E.M

    Techniques Used: Western Blot, Binding Assay

    Liver lysosomes of fed Li-ghr KO mice do not show more uptake of CMA substrates than lysosomes from littermate controls. (A) Representative western blots of liver lysosomes from control (C) and Li-ghr KO (KO) mice 2 h after treatments with leupeptin (100 mg/kg body weight) or PBS vehicle control. (B-D) Quantifications of the abundance of CMA substrates GAPDH, ENO1, and ACADL in lysosomes shown in (A). (E) Quantification of PPID, endosomal microautophagy substrate. (F) Quantification of HSPA8, CMA chaperone. For (B-F), n = 5 of each treatment group, 2-way ANOVA results are reported below each bar graph. Comparisons plotted on the bar graphs are results of Student’s t-test. Error bars are S.E.M
    Figure Legend Snippet: Liver lysosomes of fed Li-ghr KO mice do not show more uptake of CMA substrates than lysosomes from littermate controls. (A) Representative western blots of liver lysosomes from control (C) and Li-ghr KO (KO) mice 2 h after treatments with leupeptin (100 mg/kg body weight) or PBS vehicle control. (B-D) Quantifications of the abundance of CMA substrates GAPDH, ENO1, and ACADL in lysosomes shown in (A). (E) Quantification of PPID, endosomal microautophagy substrate. (F) Quantification of HSPA8, CMA chaperone. For (B-F), n = 5 of each treatment group, 2-way ANOVA results are reported below each bar graph. Comparisons plotted on the bar graphs are results of Student’s t-test. Error bars are S.E.M

    Techniques Used: Western Blot

    anti eno1  (Cell Signaling Technology Inc)


    Bioz Verified Symbol Cell Signaling Technology Inc is a verified supplier
    Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Cell Signaling Technology Inc manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 95

    Structured Review

    Cell Signaling Technology Inc anti eno1
    BIO represses the altered metabolite level involved in glycolysis in MV4-11 cells. A Heat map showing metabonomics profiling of 61 metabolites. B Quantification of relatively level of B pyruvate and C ATP in MV4-11 cells vs. SHI-1, THP-1 and RS4;11 cells. The D pyruvate and E ATP levels following BIO treatment were determined with the pyruvate Assay Kit and ATP Assay Kit. The F mRNA and G protein expression of <t>ENO1</t> were detected using RT-qPCR and Western blot assay with or without BIO incubation. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01
    Anti Eno1, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/anti eno1/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
    anti eno1 - by Bioz Stars, 2023-03
    95/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "GSK3 inhibitor suppresses cell growth and metabolic process in FLT3-ITD leukemia cells"

    Article Title: GSK3 inhibitor suppresses cell growth and metabolic process in FLT3-ITD leukemia cells

    Journal: Medical Oncology (Northwood, London, England)

    doi: 10.1007/s12032-022-01899-2

    BIO represses the altered metabolite level involved in glycolysis in MV4-11 cells. A Heat map showing metabonomics profiling of 61 metabolites. B Quantification of relatively level of B pyruvate and C ATP in MV4-11 cells vs. SHI-1, THP-1 and RS4;11 cells. The D pyruvate and E ATP levels following BIO treatment were determined with the pyruvate Assay Kit and ATP Assay Kit. The F mRNA and G protein expression of ENO1 were detected using RT-qPCR and Western blot assay with or without BIO incubation. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01
    Figure Legend Snippet: BIO represses the altered metabolite level involved in glycolysis in MV4-11 cells. A Heat map showing metabonomics profiling of 61 metabolites. B Quantification of relatively level of B pyruvate and C ATP in MV4-11 cells vs. SHI-1, THP-1 and RS4;11 cells. The D pyruvate and E ATP levels following BIO treatment were determined with the pyruvate Assay Kit and ATP Assay Kit. The F mRNA and G protein expression of ENO1 were detected using RT-qPCR and Western blot assay with or without BIO incubation. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01

    Techniques Used: Pyruvate Assay, ATP Assay, Expressing, Quantitative RT-PCR, Western Blot, Incubation

    Similar Products

  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 95
    Cell Signaling Technology Inc rabbit eno1
    Top Candidate Proteins Involved in Oridonin-treated ESCC.
    Rabbit Eno1, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/rabbit eno1/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
    rabbit eno1 - by Bioz Stars, 2023-03
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    95
    Cell Signaling Technology Inc eno1 antibodies
    AP-III-a4 inhibits cell proliferation and glucose metabolism in HNSCC cells through suppressing ENO2-mediated downstream signaling. a Effect of AP-III-a4 treatment on <t>ENO1</t> and ENO2 protein levels determined by western blotting. UM-1 and Cal27 cells were treated with AP-III-a4 at a dose range (0, 1, 2.5, 5µM) for 48 h. b - e Effect of AP-III-a4 treatment on ENO2-mediated downstream targets ( b ), cell proliferation ( c ), and intracellular levels of ATP ( d ) and glucose uptake ( e ). UM-1 and Cal27 cells were treated with or without 5µM AP-III-a4 for 48 h. * p <0.05; ** p <0.01
    Eno1 Antibodies, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/eno1 antibodies/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
    eno1 antibodies - by Bioz Stars, 2023-03
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    95
    Cell Signaling Technology Inc anti inflammatory regulators
    AP-III-a4 inhibits cell proliferation and glucose metabolism in HNSCC cells through suppressing ENO2-mediated downstream signaling. a Effect of AP-III-a4 treatment on <t>ENO1</t> and ENO2 protein levels determined by western blotting. UM-1 and Cal27 cells were treated with AP-III-a4 at a dose range (0, 1, 2.5, 5µM) for 48 h. b - e Effect of AP-III-a4 treatment on ENO2-mediated downstream targets ( b ), cell proliferation ( c ), and intracellular levels of ATP ( d ) and glucose uptake ( e ). UM-1 and Cal27 cells were treated with or without 5µM AP-III-a4 for 48 h. * p <0.05; ** p <0.01
    Anti Inflammatory Regulators, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/anti inflammatory regulators/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
    anti inflammatory regulators - by Bioz Stars, 2023-03
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    95
    Cell Signaling Technology Inc anti enolase 1
    AP-III-a4 inhibits cell proliferation and glucose metabolism in HNSCC cells through suppressing ENO2-mediated downstream signaling. a Effect of AP-III-a4 treatment on <t>ENO1</t> and ENO2 protein levels determined by western blotting. UM-1 and Cal27 cells were treated with AP-III-a4 at a dose range (0, 1, 2.5, 5µM) for 48 h. b - e Effect of AP-III-a4 treatment on ENO2-mediated downstream targets ( b ), cell proliferation ( c ), and intracellular levels of ATP ( d ) and glucose uptake ( e ). UM-1 and Cal27 cells were treated with or without 5µM AP-III-a4 for 48 h. * p <0.05; ** p <0.01
    Anti Enolase 1, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/anti enolase 1/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
    anti enolase 1 - by Bioz Stars, 2023-03
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    95
    Cell Signaling Technology Inc eno1
    Prediction of the tumor suppressors in CM by mass spectrometry-based whole-genome proteomics. The single and double asterisks indicate p < 0.05 and 0.01, respectively. CN = control, Oct4 = Oct4 plasmids, c-Myc = c-Myc plasmids, Sox2 = Sox2 plasmids, Klf4 = Klf4 plasmids, and CM = conditioned medium. ( A ) Summary list of the potential tumor suppressors by mass spectrometry-based whole-genome proteomics. ( B ) <t>Enolase</t> <t>1</t> <t>(Eno1),</t> Hsp90ab1 (HSP), Eef2, and vinculin (VCL) as 4 tumor-suppressor candidates based on MTT-based viability. ( C ) Upregulation of Eno1, Hsp90ab1, Eef2, VCL, p53, and Trail in 4T1.2 cell-derived CM with the overexpression of Oct4, c-Myc, and the treatment with OAC2. The overexpression of Sox2 and Klf4 did not alter their levels. ( D ) Alterations in the levels of Eno1 and Hsp90ab1 in Oct4 and c-Myc CM by ELISA. ( E ) Reduction in MTT-based viability of 4T1.2 cells by the treatment with Eno1 and/or Hsp90ab1 recombinant proteins. ( F ) Tumor selectivity from the MTT-based viability of tumor cells (4T1.2 mammary tumor cells, EO771 mammary tumor cells, and MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells) and human epithelium cells (KTB34-hTERT and KTB22-hTERT). Tumor selectivity is defined as a ratio of (MTT-based reduction in tumor cells) to (MTT-based reduction in non-tumor cells).
    Eno1, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/eno1/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
    eno1 - by Bioz Stars, 2023-03
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    95
    Cell Signaling Technology Inc anti eno1 antibodies
    Prediction of the tumor suppressors in CM by mass spectrometry-based whole-genome proteomics. The single and double asterisks indicate p < 0.05 and 0.01, respectively. CN = control, Oct4 = Oct4 plasmids, c-Myc = c-Myc plasmids, Sox2 = Sox2 plasmids, Klf4 = Klf4 plasmids, and CM = conditioned medium. ( A ) Summary list of the potential tumor suppressors by mass spectrometry-based whole-genome proteomics. ( B ) <t>Enolase</t> <t>1</t> <t>(Eno1),</t> Hsp90ab1 (HSP), Eef2, and vinculin (VCL) as 4 tumor-suppressor candidates based on MTT-based viability. ( C ) Upregulation of Eno1, Hsp90ab1, Eef2, VCL, p53, and Trail in 4T1.2 cell-derived CM with the overexpression of Oct4, c-Myc, and the treatment with OAC2. The overexpression of Sox2 and Klf4 did not alter their levels. ( D ) Alterations in the levels of Eno1 and Hsp90ab1 in Oct4 and c-Myc CM by ELISA. ( E ) Reduction in MTT-based viability of 4T1.2 cells by the treatment with Eno1 and/or Hsp90ab1 recombinant proteins. ( F ) Tumor selectivity from the MTT-based viability of tumor cells (4T1.2 mammary tumor cells, EO771 mammary tumor cells, and MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells) and human epithelium cells (KTB34-hTERT and KTB22-hTERT). Tumor selectivity is defined as a ratio of (MTT-based reduction in tumor cells) to (MTT-based reduction in non-tumor cells).
    Anti Eno1 Antibodies, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/anti eno1 antibodies/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
    anti eno1 antibodies - by Bioz Stars, 2023-03
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    95
    Cell Signaling Technology Inc antibodies against eno1
    Prediction of the tumor suppressors in CM by mass spectrometry-based whole-genome proteomics. The single and double asterisks indicate p < 0.05 and 0.01, respectively. CN = control, Oct4 = Oct4 plasmids, c-Myc = c-Myc plasmids, Sox2 = Sox2 plasmids, Klf4 = Klf4 plasmids, and CM = conditioned medium. ( A ) Summary list of the potential tumor suppressors by mass spectrometry-based whole-genome proteomics. ( B ) <t>Enolase</t> <t>1</t> <t>(Eno1),</t> Hsp90ab1 (HSP), Eef2, and vinculin (VCL) as 4 tumor-suppressor candidates based on MTT-based viability. ( C ) Upregulation of Eno1, Hsp90ab1, Eef2, VCL, p53, and Trail in 4T1.2 cell-derived CM with the overexpression of Oct4, c-Myc, and the treatment with OAC2. The overexpression of Sox2 and Klf4 did not alter their levels. ( D ) Alterations in the levels of Eno1 and Hsp90ab1 in Oct4 and c-Myc CM by ELISA. ( E ) Reduction in MTT-based viability of 4T1.2 cells by the treatment with Eno1 and/or Hsp90ab1 recombinant proteins. ( F ) Tumor selectivity from the MTT-based viability of tumor cells (4T1.2 mammary tumor cells, EO771 mammary tumor cells, and MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells) and human epithelium cells (KTB34-hTERT and KTB22-hTERT). Tumor selectivity is defined as a ratio of (MTT-based reduction in tumor cells) to (MTT-based reduction in non-tumor cells).
    Antibodies Against Eno1, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/antibodies against eno1/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
    antibodies against eno1 - by Bioz Stars, 2023-03
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    95
    Cell Signaling Technology Inc anti eno1
    BIO represses the altered metabolite level involved in glycolysis in MV4-11 cells. A Heat map showing metabonomics profiling of 61 metabolites. B Quantification of relatively level of B pyruvate and C ATP in MV4-11 cells vs. SHI-1, THP-1 and RS4;11 cells. The D pyruvate and E ATP levels following BIO treatment were determined with the pyruvate Assay Kit and ATP Assay Kit. The F mRNA and G protein expression of <t>ENO1</t> were detected using RT-qPCR and Western blot assay with or without BIO incubation. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01
    Anti Eno1, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/anti eno1/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
    anti eno1 - by Bioz Stars, 2023-03
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Top Candidate Proteins Involved in Oridonin-treated ESCC.

    Journal: Molecules

    Article Title: Oridonin Induces Apoptosis in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma by Inhibiting Cytoskeletal Protein LASP1 and PDLIM1

    doi: 10.3390/molecules28020805

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Top Candidate Proteins Involved in Oridonin-treated ESCC.

    Article Snippet: Membranes were blocked with 5% Beef Serum Albumin (BSA) and then incubated with primary antibodies: mouse Hsp70 antibody (mAb; Abcam, Boston, MA, USA), rabbit ENO1, LASP1, GAPDH antibodies (#3810 (pAb), #8636 (pAb), #2218 (mAb); cell signaling, Danvers, MA, USA), rabbit PDLIM1 antibody (ABclonal, Cambridge, MA, USA), and mouse β -Actin antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc., Santa Cruz, CA, USA).

    Techniques: Variant Assay

    Gene Set Enrichment Analysis and western blotting assessed that oridonin inhibits LASP1 and PDLIM1 on ESCC. ( A ) Molecular function classification of the protein candidates involved in oridonin treatment. The top three are cadherin binding, cadherin binding involved in cell–cell adhesion, and heat shock protein binding. ( B ) The top three cellular component classifications are focal adhesion, cell-substrate junction, and cell cortex. ( C ) The top three biological processes are negative regulation of apoptotic signaling pathway, removal of superoxide radicals, and cellular response to oxygen radicals. ( D ) Protein expression of LASP1 and PDLIM1 under oridonin treatment decreased compared to untreated cell lysates. Hsp70 expression increased in oridonin-treated cell lysates compared to untreated while ENO1 decreased a little in treated TE-8.

    Journal: Molecules

    Article Title: Oridonin Induces Apoptosis in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma by Inhibiting Cytoskeletal Protein LASP1 and PDLIM1

    doi: 10.3390/molecules28020805

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Gene Set Enrichment Analysis and western blotting assessed that oridonin inhibits LASP1 and PDLIM1 on ESCC. ( A ) Molecular function classification of the protein candidates involved in oridonin treatment. The top three are cadherin binding, cadherin binding involved in cell–cell adhesion, and heat shock protein binding. ( B ) The top three cellular component classifications are focal adhesion, cell-substrate junction, and cell cortex. ( C ) The top three biological processes are negative regulation of apoptotic signaling pathway, removal of superoxide radicals, and cellular response to oxygen radicals. ( D ) Protein expression of LASP1 and PDLIM1 under oridonin treatment decreased compared to untreated cell lysates. Hsp70 expression increased in oridonin-treated cell lysates compared to untreated while ENO1 decreased a little in treated TE-8.

    Article Snippet: Membranes were blocked with 5% Beef Serum Albumin (BSA) and then incubated with primary antibodies: mouse Hsp70 antibody (mAb; Abcam, Boston, MA, USA), rabbit ENO1, LASP1, GAPDH antibodies (#3810 (pAb), #8636 (pAb), #2218 (mAb); cell signaling, Danvers, MA, USA), rabbit PDLIM1 antibody (ABclonal, Cambridge, MA, USA), and mouse β -Actin antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc., Santa Cruz, CA, USA).

    Techniques: Western Blot, Binding Assay, Protein Binding, Expressing

    Interested Genes for Protein Assessment Involved in Oridonin Treatment.

    Journal: Molecules

    Article Title: Oridonin Induces Apoptosis in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma by Inhibiting Cytoskeletal Protein LASP1 and PDLIM1

    doi: 10.3390/molecules28020805

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Interested Genes for Protein Assessment Involved in Oridonin Treatment.

    Article Snippet: Membranes were blocked with 5% Beef Serum Albumin (BSA) and then incubated with primary antibodies: mouse Hsp70 antibody (mAb; Abcam, Boston, MA, USA), rabbit ENO1, LASP1, GAPDH antibodies (#3810 (pAb), #8636 (pAb), #2218 (mAb); cell signaling, Danvers, MA, USA), rabbit PDLIM1 antibody (ABclonal, Cambridge, MA, USA), and mouse β -Actin antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc., Santa Cruz, CA, USA).

    Techniques: Binding Assay, Protein Binding

    AP-III-a4 inhibits cell proliferation and glucose metabolism in HNSCC cells through suppressing ENO2-mediated downstream signaling. a Effect of AP-III-a4 treatment on ENO1 and ENO2 protein levels determined by western blotting. UM-1 and Cal27 cells were treated with AP-III-a4 at a dose range (0, 1, 2.5, 5µM) for 48 h. b - e Effect of AP-III-a4 treatment on ENO2-mediated downstream targets ( b ), cell proliferation ( c ), and intracellular levels of ATP ( d ) and glucose uptake ( e ). UM-1 and Cal27 cells were treated with or without 5µM AP-III-a4 for 48 h. * p <0.05; ** p <0.01

    Journal: Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research : CR

    Article Title: Mediation of PKM2-dependent glycolytic and non-glycolytic pathways by ENO2 in head and neck cancer development

    doi: 10.1186/s13046-022-02574-0

    Figure Lengend Snippet: AP-III-a4 inhibits cell proliferation and glucose metabolism in HNSCC cells through suppressing ENO2-mediated downstream signaling. a Effect of AP-III-a4 treatment on ENO1 and ENO2 protein levels determined by western blotting. UM-1 and Cal27 cells were treated with AP-III-a4 at a dose range (0, 1, 2.5, 5µM) for 48 h. b - e Effect of AP-III-a4 treatment on ENO2-mediated downstream targets ( b ), cell proliferation ( c ), and intracellular levels of ATP ( d ) and glucose uptake ( e ). UM-1 and Cal27 cells were treated with or without 5µM AP-III-a4 for 48 h. * p <0.05; ** p <0.01

    Article Snippet: ERK1/2, p-ERK1/2, AKT, p-AKT, P70S6K, p-P70S6K, cyclin D1 (CCND1), cyclin B, cyclin E, CDK2, CDK4, CDK6 and ENO1 antibodies were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology.

    Techniques: Western Blot

    Prediction of the tumor suppressors in CM by mass spectrometry-based whole-genome proteomics. The single and double asterisks indicate p < 0.05 and 0.01, respectively. CN = control, Oct4 = Oct4 plasmids, c-Myc = c-Myc plasmids, Sox2 = Sox2 plasmids, Klf4 = Klf4 plasmids, and CM = conditioned medium. ( A ) Summary list of the potential tumor suppressors by mass spectrometry-based whole-genome proteomics. ( B ) Enolase 1 (Eno1), Hsp90ab1 (HSP), Eef2, and vinculin (VCL) as 4 tumor-suppressor candidates based on MTT-based viability. ( C ) Upregulation of Eno1, Hsp90ab1, Eef2, VCL, p53, and Trail in 4T1.2 cell-derived CM with the overexpression of Oct4, c-Myc, and the treatment with OAC2. The overexpression of Sox2 and Klf4 did not alter their levels. ( D ) Alterations in the levels of Eno1 and Hsp90ab1 in Oct4 and c-Myc CM by ELISA. ( E ) Reduction in MTT-based viability of 4T1.2 cells by the treatment with Eno1 and/or Hsp90ab1 recombinant proteins. ( F ) Tumor selectivity from the MTT-based viability of tumor cells (4T1.2 mammary tumor cells, EO771 mammary tumor cells, and MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells) and human epithelium cells (KTB34-hTERT and KTB22-hTERT). Tumor selectivity is defined as a ratio of (MTT-based reduction in tumor cells) to (MTT-based reduction in non-tumor cells).

    Journal: Theranostics

    Article Title: Counterintuitive production of tumor-suppressive secretomes from Oct4- and c-Myc-overexpressing tumor cells and MSCs

    doi: 10.7150/thno.70549

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Prediction of the tumor suppressors in CM by mass spectrometry-based whole-genome proteomics. The single and double asterisks indicate p < 0.05 and 0.01, respectively. CN = control, Oct4 = Oct4 plasmids, c-Myc = c-Myc plasmids, Sox2 = Sox2 plasmids, Klf4 = Klf4 plasmids, and CM = conditioned medium. ( A ) Summary list of the potential tumor suppressors by mass spectrometry-based whole-genome proteomics. ( B ) Enolase 1 (Eno1), Hsp90ab1 (HSP), Eef2, and vinculin (VCL) as 4 tumor-suppressor candidates based on MTT-based viability. ( C ) Upregulation of Eno1, Hsp90ab1, Eef2, VCL, p53, and Trail in 4T1.2 cell-derived CM with the overexpression of Oct4, c-Myc, and the treatment with OAC2. The overexpression of Sox2 and Klf4 did not alter their levels. ( D ) Alterations in the levels of Eno1 and Hsp90ab1 in Oct4 and c-Myc CM by ELISA. ( E ) Reduction in MTT-based viability of 4T1.2 cells by the treatment with Eno1 and/or Hsp90ab1 recombinant proteins. ( F ) Tumor selectivity from the MTT-based viability of tumor cells (4T1.2 mammary tumor cells, EO771 mammary tumor cells, and MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells) and human epithelium cells (KTB34-hTERT and KTB22-hTERT). Tumor selectivity is defined as a ratio of (MTT-based reduction in tumor cells) to (MTT-based reduction in non-tumor cells).

    Article Snippet: Antibodies against c-Myc, Oct4, Sox2, Klf4, Lrp5, Runx2, Snail, TGFβ, Eno1, Eef2, vinculin, β-catenin, p-Akt, Akt, p-NFkB p65, NFkB p65, p-ERK, ERK (Cell Signaling), MMP9, NFATc1, cathepsin K (Santa Cruz, Dallas, TX, USA), TRAIL (Novus, Centennial, CO, USA), p53 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), Hsp90ab1 (Abcam, Cambridge, UK), Kdm3a (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and β-actin as a control (Sigma) were employed.

    Techniques: Mass Spectrometry, Derivative Assay, Over Expression, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Recombinant

    Tumor-promoting effects by the overexpression of Eno1, Eef2, and VCL in 4T1.2 mammary tumor cells, and tumor-suppressing effects by the administration of their recombinant proteins. The double asterisk indicates p < 0.01. CN = control, Eno1 = enolase 1, VCL = vinculin, and Hsp = Hsp90ab1. ( A-C ) Elevation in EdU-based proliferation, transwell invasion, and the upregulation of Lrp5, MMP9, Runx2, TGFβ, and Snail by the overexpression of Eno1, Eef2, and VCL in 4T1.2 tumor cells. ( D ) Decrease in EdU-based proliferation by the administration of Eno1, Eef2, and VCL recombinant proteins. ( E ) Reduction in transwell invasion by the administration of Eno1, Eef2, and VCL recombinant proteins. ( F ) Downregulation of Lrp5, MMP9, Runx2, TGFβ, and Snail in 4T1.2 tumor cells by the administration of Eno1, Eef2, and VCL recombinant proteins. ( G ) Co-immunoprecipitation of CD44 by Eno1 in 4T1.2 cells. ( H-I ) Suppression of the reduction in MTT-based viability by Eno1 in response to the silencing of CD44. ( J ) Downregulation of Lrp5, Runx2, MMP9 and Snail in 4T1.2 cells by the administration of Eno1 recombinant proteins, and the suppression by the silencing of CD44. ( K-L ) Western blotting of wild-type and mutant CD44 proteins, which were pulled down by Halo-tagged Eno1 proteins. PD = pull-down assay, NC = negative control, pl = Eno1 or CD44 proteins from plasmid transfection, MT = mutant CD44 without a cytoplasmic domain, and WT = wild-type CD44.

    Journal: Theranostics

    Article Title: Counterintuitive production of tumor-suppressive secretomes from Oct4- and c-Myc-overexpressing tumor cells and MSCs

    doi: 10.7150/thno.70549

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Tumor-promoting effects by the overexpression of Eno1, Eef2, and VCL in 4T1.2 mammary tumor cells, and tumor-suppressing effects by the administration of their recombinant proteins. The double asterisk indicates p < 0.01. CN = control, Eno1 = enolase 1, VCL = vinculin, and Hsp = Hsp90ab1. ( A-C ) Elevation in EdU-based proliferation, transwell invasion, and the upregulation of Lrp5, MMP9, Runx2, TGFβ, and Snail by the overexpression of Eno1, Eef2, and VCL in 4T1.2 tumor cells. ( D ) Decrease in EdU-based proliferation by the administration of Eno1, Eef2, and VCL recombinant proteins. ( E ) Reduction in transwell invasion by the administration of Eno1, Eef2, and VCL recombinant proteins. ( F ) Downregulation of Lrp5, MMP9, Runx2, TGFβ, and Snail in 4T1.2 tumor cells by the administration of Eno1, Eef2, and VCL recombinant proteins. ( G ) Co-immunoprecipitation of CD44 by Eno1 in 4T1.2 cells. ( H-I ) Suppression of the reduction in MTT-based viability by Eno1 in response to the silencing of CD44. ( J ) Downregulation of Lrp5, Runx2, MMP9 and Snail in 4T1.2 cells by the administration of Eno1 recombinant proteins, and the suppression by the silencing of CD44. ( K-L ) Western blotting of wild-type and mutant CD44 proteins, which were pulled down by Halo-tagged Eno1 proteins. PD = pull-down assay, NC = negative control, pl = Eno1 or CD44 proteins from plasmid transfection, MT = mutant CD44 without a cytoplasmic domain, and WT = wild-type CD44.

    Article Snippet: Antibodies against c-Myc, Oct4, Sox2, Klf4, Lrp5, Runx2, Snail, TGFβ, Eno1, Eef2, vinculin, β-catenin, p-Akt, Akt, p-NFkB p65, NFkB p65, p-ERK, ERK (Cell Signaling), MMP9, NFATc1, cathepsin K (Santa Cruz, Dallas, TX, USA), TRAIL (Novus, Centennial, CO, USA), p53 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), Hsp90ab1 (Abcam, Cambridge, UK), Kdm3a (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and β-actin as a control (Sigma) were employed.

    Techniques: Over Expression, Recombinant, Immunoprecipitation, Western Blot, Mutagenesis, Pull Down Assay, Negative Control, Plasmid Preparation, Transfection

    Downregulation of PDL-1 and Kdm3a in 4T1.2 mammary tumor cells by Hsp90ab1, Eno1, Eef2, and VCL, and the suppression of the development of osteoclasts. CN = control, Hsp = Hsp90ab1, Eno1 = enolase 1, VCL = vinculin, Oct4 = Oct4 plasmids, and CM = conditioned medium. The double asterisk indicates p < 0.01. ( A ) Reduction in the size and weight of mammary tumors by the daily intravenous administration of 1 μg/mL Eno1. EO771 mammary tumor cells were inoculated into the mammary fat pad of C57BL/6 female mice (N = 10). (B) Reduction in p-AKT, NFkB p65, p-ERK, and TNFα in 4T1.2 cells in response to Eno1 recombinant proteins. ( C ) Reduction in PDL1 in 4T1.2 cells by Oct4/cMyc-overexpressing 4T1.2 CM, and Eno1, Hsp, Eef2, and VCL recombinant proteins. ( D ) Reduction in Kdm3a in 4T1.2 cells in response to Eno1, Hsp90ab1, Eef2, and/or VCL recombinant proteins. ( E ) Elevation of Kdm3a in 4T1.2 cells by the overexpression of Eno1, Eef2, and VCL. ( F ) Suppression of RANKL-stimulated osteoclast development by Oct4-overexpressing CM. ( G ) Reduction in the levels of cathepsin K and NFATc1 in RANKL-stimulated osteoclasts by Oct4-overexpressing CM. ( H ) Regulatory mechanism by the tumor-suppressive secretomes, which were derived from Oct4- and c-Myc-overexpressing tumor cells.

    Journal: Theranostics

    Article Title: Counterintuitive production of tumor-suppressive secretomes from Oct4- and c-Myc-overexpressing tumor cells and MSCs

    doi: 10.7150/thno.70549

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Downregulation of PDL-1 and Kdm3a in 4T1.2 mammary tumor cells by Hsp90ab1, Eno1, Eef2, and VCL, and the suppression of the development of osteoclasts. CN = control, Hsp = Hsp90ab1, Eno1 = enolase 1, VCL = vinculin, Oct4 = Oct4 plasmids, and CM = conditioned medium. The double asterisk indicates p < 0.01. ( A ) Reduction in the size and weight of mammary tumors by the daily intravenous administration of 1 μg/mL Eno1. EO771 mammary tumor cells were inoculated into the mammary fat pad of C57BL/6 female mice (N = 10). (B) Reduction in p-AKT, NFkB p65, p-ERK, and TNFα in 4T1.2 cells in response to Eno1 recombinant proteins. ( C ) Reduction in PDL1 in 4T1.2 cells by Oct4/cMyc-overexpressing 4T1.2 CM, and Eno1, Hsp, Eef2, and VCL recombinant proteins. ( D ) Reduction in Kdm3a in 4T1.2 cells in response to Eno1, Hsp90ab1, Eef2, and/or VCL recombinant proteins. ( E ) Elevation of Kdm3a in 4T1.2 cells by the overexpression of Eno1, Eef2, and VCL. ( F ) Suppression of RANKL-stimulated osteoclast development by Oct4-overexpressing CM. ( G ) Reduction in the levels of cathepsin K and NFATc1 in RANKL-stimulated osteoclasts by Oct4-overexpressing CM. ( H ) Regulatory mechanism by the tumor-suppressive secretomes, which were derived from Oct4- and c-Myc-overexpressing tumor cells.

    Article Snippet: Antibodies against c-Myc, Oct4, Sox2, Klf4, Lrp5, Runx2, Snail, TGFβ, Eno1, Eef2, vinculin, β-catenin, p-Akt, Akt, p-NFkB p65, NFkB p65, p-ERK, ERK (Cell Signaling), MMP9, NFATc1, cathepsin K (Santa Cruz, Dallas, TX, USA), TRAIL (Novus, Centennial, CO, USA), p53 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), Hsp90ab1 (Abcam, Cambridge, UK), Kdm3a (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and β-actin as a control (Sigma) were employed.

    Techniques: Recombinant, Over Expression, Derivative Assay

    Prediction of the tumor suppressors in CM by mass spectrometry-based whole-genome proteomics. The single and double asterisks indicate p < 0.05 and 0.01, respectively. CN = control, Oct4 = Oct4 plasmids, c-Myc = c-Myc plasmids, Sox2 = Sox2 plasmids, Klf4 = Klf4 plasmids, and CM = conditioned medium. ( A ) Summary list of the potential tumor suppressors by mass spectrometry-based whole-genome proteomics. ( B ) Enolase 1 (Eno1), Hsp90ab1 (HSP), Eef2, and vinculin (VCL) as 4 tumor-suppressor candidates based on MTT-based viability. ( C ) Upregulation of Eno1, Hsp90ab1, Eef2, VCL, p53, and Trail in 4T1.2 cell-derived CM with the overexpression of Oct4, c-Myc, and the treatment with OAC2. The overexpression of Sox2 and Klf4 did not alter their levels. ( D ) Alterations in the levels of Eno1 and Hsp90ab1 in Oct4 and c-Myc CM by ELISA. ( E ) Reduction in MTT-based viability of 4T1.2 cells by the treatment with Eno1 and/or Hsp90ab1 recombinant proteins. ( F ) Tumor selectivity from the MTT-based viability of tumor cells (4T1.2 mammary tumor cells, EO771 mammary tumor cells, and MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells) and human epithelium cells (KTB34-hTERT and KTB22-hTERT). Tumor selectivity is defined as a ratio of (MTT-based reduction in tumor cells) to (MTT-based reduction in non-tumor cells).

    Journal: Theranostics

    Article Title: Counterintuitive production of tumor-suppressive secretomes from Oct4- and c-Myc-overexpressing tumor cells and MSCs

    doi: 10.7150/thno.70549

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Prediction of the tumor suppressors in CM by mass spectrometry-based whole-genome proteomics. The single and double asterisks indicate p < 0.05 and 0.01, respectively. CN = control, Oct4 = Oct4 plasmids, c-Myc = c-Myc plasmids, Sox2 = Sox2 plasmids, Klf4 = Klf4 plasmids, and CM = conditioned medium. ( A ) Summary list of the potential tumor suppressors by mass spectrometry-based whole-genome proteomics. ( B ) Enolase 1 (Eno1), Hsp90ab1 (HSP), Eef2, and vinculin (VCL) as 4 tumor-suppressor candidates based on MTT-based viability. ( C ) Upregulation of Eno1, Hsp90ab1, Eef2, VCL, p53, and Trail in 4T1.2 cell-derived CM with the overexpression of Oct4, c-Myc, and the treatment with OAC2. The overexpression of Sox2 and Klf4 did not alter their levels. ( D ) Alterations in the levels of Eno1 and Hsp90ab1 in Oct4 and c-Myc CM by ELISA. ( E ) Reduction in MTT-based viability of 4T1.2 cells by the treatment with Eno1 and/or Hsp90ab1 recombinant proteins. ( F ) Tumor selectivity from the MTT-based viability of tumor cells (4T1.2 mammary tumor cells, EO771 mammary tumor cells, and MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells) and human epithelium cells (KTB34-hTERT and KTB22-hTERT). Tumor selectivity is defined as a ratio of (MTT-based reduction in tumor cells) to (MTT-based reduction in non-tumor cells).

    Article Snippet: Protein samples were pretreated with agarose beads conjugated with protein A and rabbit IgG, followed by the overnight immunoprecipitation with the beads conjugated with anti-Eno1 antibodies (Cell Signaling).

    Techniques: Mass Spectrometry, Derivative Assay, Over Expression, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Recombinant

    Tumor-promoting effects by the overexpression of Eno1, Eef2, and VCL in 4T1.2 mammary tumor cells, and tumor-suppressing effects by the administration of their recombinant proteins. The double asterisk indicates p < 0.01. CN = control, Eno1 = enolase 1, VCL = vinculin, and Hsp = Hsp90ab1. ( A-C ) Elevation in EdU-based proliferation, transwell invasion, and the upregulation of Lrp5, MMP9, Runx2, TGFβ, and Snail by the overexpression of Eno1, Eef2, and VCL in 4T1.2 tumor cells. ( D ) Decrease in EdU-based proliferation by the administration of Eno1, Eef2, and VCL recombinant proteins. ( E ) Reduction in transwell invasion by the administration of Eno1, Eef2, and VCL recombinant proteins. ( F ) Downregulation of Lrp5, MMP9, Runx2, TGFβ, and Snail in 4T1.2 tumor cells by the administration of Eno1, Eef2, and VCL recombinant proteins. ( G ) Co-immunoprecipitation of CD44 by Eno1 in 4T1.2 cells. ( H-I ) Suppression of the reduction in MTT-based viability by Eno1 in response to the silencing of CD44. ( J ) Downregulation of Lrp5, Runx2, MMP9 and Snail in 4T1.2 cells by the administration of Eno1 recombinant proteins, and the suppression by the silencing of CD44. ( K-L ) Western blotting of wild-type and mutant CD44 proteins, which were pulled down by Halo-tagged Eno1 proteins. PD = pull-down assay, NC = negative control, pl = Eno1 or CD44 proteins from plasmid transfection, MT = mutant CD44 without a cytoplasmic domain, and WT = wild-type CD44.

    Journal: Theranostics

    Article Title: Counterintuitive production of tumor-suppressive secretomes from Oct4- and c-Myc-overexpressing tumor cells and MSCs

    doi: 10.7150/thno.70549

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Tumor-promoting effects by the overexpression of Eno1, Eef2, and VCL in 4T1.2 mammary tumor cells, and tumor-suppressing effects by the administration of their recombinant proteins. The double asterisk indicates p < 0.01. CN = control, Eno1 = enolase 1, VCL = vinculin, and Hsp = Hsp90ab1. ( A-C ) Elevation in EdU-based proliferation, transwell invasion, and the upregulation of Lrp5, MMP9, Runx2, TGFβ, and Snail by the overexpression of Eno1, Eef2, and VCL in 4T1.2 tumor cells. ( D ) Decrease in EdU-based proliferation by the administration of Eno1, Eef2, and VCL recombinant proteins. ( E ) Reduction in transwell invasion by the administration of Eno1, Eef2, and VCL recombinant proteins. ( F ) Downregulation of Lrp5, MMP9, Runx2, TGFβ, and Snail in 4T1.2 tumor cells by the administration of Eno1, Eef2, and VCL recombinant proteins. ( G ) Co-immunoprecipitation of CD44 by Eno1 in 4T1.2 cells. ( H-I ) Suppression of the reduction in MTT-based viability by Eno1 in response to the silencing of CD44. ( J ) Downregulation of Lrp5, Runx2, MMP9 and Snail in 4T1.2 cells by the administration of Eno1 recombinant proteins, and the suppression by the silencing of CD44. ( K-L ) Western blotting of wild-type and mutant CD44 proteins, which were pulled down by Halo-tagged Eno1 proteins. PD = pull-down assay, NC = negative control, pl = Eno1 or CD44 proteins from plasmid transfection, MT = mutant CD44 without a cytoplasmic domain, and WT = wild-type CD44.

    Article Snippet: Protein samples were pretreated with agarose beads conjugated with protein A and rabbit IgG, followed by the overnight immunoprecipitation with the beads conjugated with anti-Eno1 antibodies (Cell Signaling).

    Techniques: Over Expression, Recombinant, Immunoprecipitation, Western Blot, Mutagenesis, Pull Down Assay, Negative Control, Plasmid Preparation, Transfection

    Downregulation of PDL-1 and Kdm3a in 4T1.2 mammary tumor cells by Hsp90ab1, Eno1, Eef2, and VCL, and the suppression of the development of osteoclasts. CN = control, Hsp = Hsp90ab1, Eno1 = enolase 1, VCL = vinculin, Oct4 = Oct4 plasmids, and CM = conditioned medium. The double asterisk indicates p < 0.01. ( A ) Reduction in the size and weight of mammary tumors by the daily intravenous administration of 1 μg/mL Eno1. EO771 mammary tumor cells were inoculated into the mammary fat pad of C57BL/6 female mice (N = 10). (B) Reduction in p-AKT, NFkB p65, p-ERK, and TNFα in 4T1.2 cells in response to Eno1 recombinant proteins. ( C ) Reduction in PDL1 in 4T1.2 cells by Oct4/cMyc-overexpressing 4T1.2 CM, and Eno1, Hsp, Eef2, and VCL recombinant proteins. ( D ) Reduction in Kdm3a in 4T1.2 cells in response to Eno1, Hsp90ab1, Eef2, and/or VCL recombinant proteins. ( E ) Elevation of Kdm3a in 4T1.2 cells by the overexpression of Eno1, Eef2, and VCL. ( F ) Suppression of RANKL-stimulated osteoclast development by Oct4-overexpressing CM. ( G ) Reduction in the levels of cathepsin K and NFATc1 in RANKL-stimulated osteoclasts by Oct4-overexpressing CM. ( H ) Regulatory mechanism by the tumor-suppressive secretomes, which were derived from Oct4- and c-Myc-overexpressing tumor cells.

    Journal: Theranostics

    Article Title: Counterintuitive production of tumor-suppressive secretomes from Oct4- and c-Myc-overexpressing tumor cells and MSCs

    doi: 10.7150/thno.70549

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Downregulation of PDL-1 and Kdm3a in 4T1.2 mammary tumor cells by Hsp90ab1, Eno1, Eef2, and VCL, and the suppression of the development of osteoclasts. CN = control, Hsp = Hsp90ab1, Eno1 = enolase 1, VCL = vinculin, Oct4 = Oct4 plasmids, and CM = conditioned medium. The double asterisk indicates p < 0.01. ( A ) Reduction in the size and weight of mammary tumors by the daily intravenous administration of 1 μg/mL Eno1. EO771 mammary tumor cells were inoculated into the mammary fat pad of C57BL/6 female mice (N = 10). (B) Reduction in p-AKT, NFkB p65, p-ERK, and TNFα in 4T1.2 cells in response to Eno1 recombinant proteins. ( C ) Reduction in PDL1 in 4T1.2 cells by Oct4/cMyc-overexpressing 4T1.2 CM, and Eno1, Hsp, Eef2, and VCL recombinant proteins. ( D ) Reduction in Kdm3a in 4T1.2 cells in response to Eno1, Hsp90ab1, Eef2, and/or VCL recombinant proteins. ( E ) Elevation of Kdm3a in 4T1.2 cells by the overexpression of Eno1, Eef2, and VCL. ( F ) Suppression of RANKL-stimulated osteoclast development by Oct4-overexpressing CM. ( G ) Reduction in the levels of cathepsin K and NFATc1 in RANKL-stimulated osteoclasts by Oct4-overexpressing CM. ( H ) Regulatory mechanism by the tumor-suppressive secretomes, which were derived from Oct4- and c-Myc-overexpressing tumor cells.

    Article Snippet: Protein samples were pretreated with agarose beads conjugated with protein A and rabbit IgG, followed by the overnight immunoprecipitation with the beads conjugated with anti-Eno1 antibodies (Cell Signaling).

    Techniques: Recombinant, Over Expression, Derivative Assay

    Prediction of the tumor suppressors in CM by mass spectrometry-based whole-genome proteomics. The single and double asterisks indicate p < 0.05 and 0.01, respectively. CN = control, Oct4 = Oct4 plasmids, c-Myc = c-Myc plasmids, Sox2 = Sox2 plasmids, Klf4 = Klf4 plasmids, and CM = conditioned medium. ( A ) Summary list of the potential tumor suppressors by mass spectrometry-based whole-genome proteomics. ( B ) Enolase 1 (Eno1), Hsp90ab1 (HSP), Eef2, and vinculin (VCL) as 4 tumor-suppressor candidates based on MTT-based viability. ( C ) Upregulation of Eno1, Hsp90ab1, Eef2, VCL, p53, and Trail in 4T1.2 cell-derived CM with the overexpression of Oct4, c-Myc, and the treatment with OAC2. The overexpression of Sox2 and Klf4 did not alter their levels. ( D ) Alterations in the levels of Eno1 and Hsp90ab1 in Oct4 and c-Myc CM by ELISA. ( E ) Reduction in MTT-based viability of 4T1.2 cells by the treatment with Eno1 and/or Hsp90ab1 recombinant proteins. ( F ) Tumor selectivity from the MTT-based viability of tumor cells (4T1.2 mammary tumor cells, EO771 mammary tumor cells, and MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells) and human epithelium cells (KTB34-hTERT and KTB22-hTERT). Tumor selectivity is defined as a ratio of (MTT-based reduction in tumor cells) to (MTT-based reduction in non-tumor cells).

    Journal: Theranostics

    Article Title: Counterintuitive production of tumor-suppressive secretomes from Oct4- and c-Myc-overexpressing tumor cells and MSCs

    doi: 10.7150/thno.70549

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Prediction of the tumor suppressors in CM by mass spectrometry-based whole-genome proteomics. The single and double asterisks indicate p < 0.05 and 0.01, respectively. CN = control, Oct4 = Oct4 plasmids, c-Myc = c-Myc plasmids, Sox2 = Sox2 plasmids, Klf4 = Klf4 plasmids, and CM = conditioned medium. ( A ) Summary list of the potential tumor suppressors by mass spectrometry-based whole-genome proteomics. ( B ) Enolase 1 (Eno1), Hsp90ab1 (HSP), Eef2, and vinculin (VCL) as 4 tumor-suppressor candidates based on MTT-based viability. ( C ) Upregulation of Eno1, Hsp90ab1, Eef2, VCL, p53, and Trail in 4T1.2 cell-derived CM with the overexpression of Oct4, c-Myc, and the treatment with OAC2. The overexpression of Sox2 and Klf4 did not alter their levels. ( D ) Alterations in the levels of Eno1 and Hsp90ab1 in Oct4 and c-Myc CM by ELISA. ( E ) Reduction in MTT-based viability of 4T1.2 cells by the treatment with Eno1 and/or Hsp90ab1 recombinant proteins. ( F ) Tumor selectivity from the MTT-based viability of tumor cells (4T1.2 mammary tumor cells, EO771 mammary tumor cells, and MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells) and human epithelium cells (KTB34-hTERT and KTB22-hTERT). Tumor selectivity is defined as a ratio of (MTT-based reduction in tumor cells) to (MTT-based reduction in non-tumor cells).

    Article Snippet: Western blotting was conducted using antibodies against Eno1 and CD44 (Cell Signaling).

    Techniques: Mass Spectrometry, Derivative Assay, Over Expression, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Recombinant

    Tumor-promoting effects by the overexpression of Eno1, Eef2, and VCL in 4T1.2 mammary tumor cells, and tumor-suppressing effects by the administration of their recombinant proteins. The double asterisk indicates p < 0.01. CN = control, Eno1 = enolase 1, VCL = vinculin, and Hsp = Hsp90ab1. ( A-C ) Elevation in EdU-based proliferation, transwell invasion, and the upregulation of Lrp5, MMP9, Runx2, TGFβ, and Snail by the overexpression of Eno1, Eef2, and VCL in 4T1.2 tumor cells. ( D ) Decrease in EdU-based proliferation by the administration of Eno1, Eef2, and VCL recombinant proteins. ( E ) Reduction in transwell invasion by the administration of Eno1, Eef2, and VCL recombinant proteins. ( F ) Downregulation of Lrp5, MMP9, Runx2, TGFβ, and Snail in 4T1.2 tumor cells by the administration of Eno1, Eef2, and VCL recombinant proteins. ( G ) Co-immunoprecipitation of CD44 by Eno1 in 4T1.2 cells. ( H-I ) Suppression of the reduction in MTT-based viability by Eno1 in response to the silencing of CD44. ( J ) Downregulation of Lrp5, Runx2, MMP9 and Snail in 4T1.2 cells by the administration of Eno1 recombinant proteins, and the suppression by the silencing of CD44. ( K-L ) Western blotting of wild-type and mutant CD44 proteins, which were pulled down by Halo-tagged Eno1 proteins. PD = pull-down assay, NC = negative control, pl = Eno1 or CD44 proteins from plasmid transfection, MT = mutant CD44 without a cytoplasmic domain, and WT = wild-type CD44.

    Journal: Theranostics

    Article Title: Counterintuitive production of tumor-suppressive secretomes from Oct4- and c-Myc-overexpressing tumor cells and MSCs

    doi: 10.7150/thno.70549

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Tumor-promoting effects by the overexpression of Eno1, Eef2, and VCL in 4T1.2 mammary tumor cells, and tumor-suppressing effects by the administration of their recombinant proteins. The double asterisk indicates p < 0.01. CN = control, Eno1 = enolase 1, VCL = vinculin, and Hsp = Hsp90ab1. ( A-C ) Elevation in EdU-based proliferation, transwell invasion, and the upregulation of Lrp5, MMP9, Runx2, TGFβ, and Snail by the overexpression of Eno1, Eef2, and VCL in 4T1.2 tumor cells. ( D ) Decrease in EdU-based proliferation by the administration of Eno1, Eef2, and VCL recombinant proteins. ( E ) Reduction in transwell invasion by the administration of Eno1, Eef2, and VCL recombinant proteins. ( F ) Downregulation of Lrp5, MMP9, Runx2, TGFβ, and Snail in 4T1.2 tumor cells by the administration of Eno1, Eef2, and VCL recombinant proteins. ( G ) Co-immunoprecipitation of CD44 by Eno1 in 4T1.2 cells. ( H-I ) Suppression of the reduction in MTT-based viability by Eno1 in response to the silencing of CD44. ( J ) Downregulation of Lrp5, Runx2, MMP9 and Snail in 4T1.2 cells by the administration of Eno1 recombinant proteins, and the suppression by the silencing of CD44. ( K-L ) Western blotting of wild-type and mutant CD44 proteins, which were pulled down by Halo-tagged Eno1 proteins. PD = pull-down assay, NC = negative control, pl = Eno1 or CD44 proteins from plasmid transfection, MT = mutant CD44 without a cytoplasmic domain, and WT = wild-type CD44.

    Article Snippet: Western blotting was conducted using antibodies against Eno1 and CD44 (Cell Signaling).

    Techniques: Over Expression, Recombinant, Immunoprecipitation, Western Blot, Mutagenesis, Pull Down Assay, Negative Control, Plasmid Preparation, Transfection

    Downregulation of PDL-1 and Kdm3a in 4T1.2 mammary tumor cells by Hsp90ab1, Eno1, Eef2, and VCL, and the suppression of the development of osteoclasts. CN = control, Hsp = Hsp90ab1, Eno1 = enolase 1, VCL = vinculin, Oct4 = Oct4 plasmids, and CM = conditioned medium. The double asterisk indicates p < 0.01. ( A ) Reduction in the size and weight of mammary tumors by the daily intravenous administration of 1 μg/mL Eno1. EO771 mammary tumor cells were inoculated into the mammary fat pad of C57BL/6 female mice (N = 10). (B) Reduction in p-AKT, NFkB p65, p-ERK, and TNFα in 4T1.2 cells in response to Eno1 recombinant proteins. ( C ) Reduction in PDL1 in 4T1.2 cells by Oct4/cMyc-overexpressing 4T1.2 CM, and Eno1, Hsp, Eef2, and VCL recombinant proteins. ( D ) Reduction in Kdm3a in 4T1.2 cells in response to Eno1, Hsp90ab1, Eef2, and/or VCL recombinant proteins. ( E ) Elevation of Kdm3a in 4T1.2 cells by the overexpression of Eno1, Eef2, and VCL. ( F ) Suppression of RANKL-stimulated osteoclast development by Oct4-overexpressing CM. ( G ) Reduction in the levels of cathepsin K and NFATc1 in RANKL-stimulated osteoclasts by Oct4-overexpressing CM. ( H ) Regulatory mechanism by the tumor-suppressive secretomes, which were derived from Oct4- and c-Myc-overexpressing tumor cells.

    Journal: Theranostics

    Article Title: Counterintuitive production of tumor-suppressive secretomes from Oct4- and c-Myc-overexpressing tumor cells and MSCs

    doi: 10.7150/thno.70549

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Downregulation of PDL-1 and Kdm3a in 4T1.2 mammary tumor cells by Hsp90ab1, Eno1, Eef2, and VCL, and the suppression of the development of osteoclasts. CN = control, Hsp = Hsp90ab1, Eno1 = enolase 1, VCL = vinculin, Oct4 = Oct4 plasmids, and CM = conditioned medium. The double asterisk indicates p < 0.01. ( A ) Reduction in the size and weight of mammary tumors by the daily intravenous administration of 1 μg/mL Eno1. EO771 mammary tumor cells were inoculated into the mammary fat pad of C57BL/6 female mice (N = 10). (B) Reduction in p-AKT, NFkB p65, p-ERK, and TNFα in 4T1.2 cells in response to Eno1 recombinant proteins. ( C ) Reduction in PDL1 in 4T1.2 cells by Oct4/cMyc-overexpressing 4T1.2 CM, and Eno1, Hsp, Eef2, and VCL recombinant proteins. ( D ) Reduction in Kdm3a in 4T1.2 cells in response to Eno1, Hsp90ab1, Eef2, and/or VCL recombinant proteins. ( E ) Elevation of Kdm3a in 4T1.2 cells by the overexpression of Eno1, Eef2, and VCL. ( F ) Suppression of RANKL-stimulated osteoclast development by Oct4-overexpressing CM. ( G ) Reduction in the levels of cathepsin K and NFATc1 in RANKL-stimulated osteoclasts by Oct4-overexpressing CM. ( H ) Regulatory mechanism by the tumor-suppressive secretomes, which were derived from Oct4- and c-Myc-overexpressing tumor cells.

    Article Snippet: Western blotting was conducted using antibodies against Eno1 and CD44 (Cell Signaling).

    Techniques: Recombinant, Over Expression, Derivative Assay

    BIO represses the altered metabolite level involved in glycolysis in MV4-11 cells. A Heat map showing metabonomics profiling of 61 metabolites. B Quantification of relatively level of B pyruvate and C ATP in MV4-11 cells vs. SHI-1, THP-1 and RS4;11 cells. The D pyruvate and E ATP levels following BIO treatment were determined with the pyruvate Assay Kit and ATP Assay Kit. The F mRNA and G protein expression of ENO1 were detected using RT-qPCR and Western blot assay with or without BIO incubation. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01

    Journal: Medical Oncology (Northwood, London, England)

    Article Title: GSK3 inhibitor suppresses cell growth and metabolic process in FLT3-ITD leukemia cells

    doi: 10.1007/s12032-022-01899-2

    Figure Lengend Snippet: BIO represses the altered metabolite level involved in glycolysis in MV4-11 cells. A Heat map showing metabonomics profiling of 61 metabolites. B Quantification of relatively level of B pyruvate and C ATP in MV4-11 cells vs. SHI-1, THP-1 and RS4;11 cells. The D pyruvate and E ATP levels following BIO treatment were determined with the pyruvate Assay Kit and ATP Assay Kit. The F mRNA and G protein expression of ENO1 were detected using RT-qPCR and Western blot assay with or without BIO incubation. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01

    Article Snippet: The membranes were incubated with 3% bovine serum albumin for 2 h at room temperature (RT) and then incubated overnight at 4 °C with the following primary antibodies: anti-ENO1 (cell signaling technology, 3810), anti-β-Catenin (Cell Signaling Technology, 8480), anti-caspase3 (cell signaling technology, 14220S), anti-p21 (cell signaling technology, 2947S), anti-cyclin D2 (cell signaling technology, 3741S) and anti-GAPDH (cell signaling technology, 5174).

    Techniques: Pyruvate Assay, ATP Assay, Expressing, Quantitative RT-PCR, Western Blot, Incubation