Review




Structured Review

Proteintech antibody eef1a2
Eef1a expression analysis. (A,B) Mean Eef1a1 (A) and <t>Eef1a2</t> (B) mRNA quantities in the brains of P24 mice in the E122K line, normalised to the geometric mean of Gapdh , Ubc and B2m transcript levels. Values for individual biological replicates are shown as dots. Genotypes were compared using ordinary one-way ANOVAs. There was no statistically significant difference in relative Eef1a1 mRNA quantities between genotypes [ F (2, 9)=0.2807, P =0.7616]. There was a statistically significant difference in relative Eef1a2 mRNA quantities between genotypes [ F (2, 9)=16.16, P =0.001]. *** P <0.001 (Dunnett's post-hoc test, +/+ versus other genotypes). (C) Representative Western blots of P24 brain, heart and muscle lysates showing eEF1A2 and a total protein stain. Brain lysates from wst/wst mice, homozygous for an Eef1a2 abolishing deletion , were used as a negative control for eEF1A2. Lysates from adult skeletal muscle were used as a positive control. Brightness and contrast settings were set separately for each blot shown for illustration purposes (applied to the whole image), but this did not affect the quantification using Image Studio Lite software. Western blots were performed in triplicate for each sex with values averaged across replicates. (D-I) Quantification of eEF1A2 levels, normalised to total protein and expressed as a percentage of wild-type expression levels, were compared using ordinary one-way ANOVAs. There were no statistically significant differences in relative eEF1A2 levels in male heart [E; F (2, 6)=1.595, P =0.2782] or female heart [H; F (2, 6)=1.949, P =0.2227]. There were statistically significant differences in relative eEF1A2 levels in male brain [D; F (2, 6)=13.32, P =0.0062], female brain [G; F (2, 6)=39.60, P =0.0003], male muscle [F; F (2, 6)=28.49, P =0.0009] and female muscle [I; F (2, 6)=39.76, P =0.0003]. ** P <0.01, *** P <0.001 (Dunnett's post-hoc test, +/+ versus other genotypes). Sample sizes are shown at the base of the bars. Error bars show the s.d. AU, arbitrary units.
Antibody Eef1a2, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/antibody eef1a2/product/Proteintech
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
antibody eef1a2 - by Bioz Stars, 2025-03
86/100 stars

Images

1) Product Images from "Face-valid phenotypes in a mouse model of the most common mutation in EEF1A2 -related neurodevelopmental disorder"

Article Title: Face-valid phenotypes in a mouse model of the most common mutation in EEF1A2 -related neurodevelopmental disorder

Journal: Disease Models & Mechanisms

doi: 10.1242/dmm.050501

Eef1a expression analysis. (A,B) Mean Eef1a1 (A) and Eef1a2 (B) mRNA quantities in the brains of P24 mice in the E122K line, normalised to the geometric mean of Gapdh , Ubc and B2m transcript levels. Values for individual biological replicates are shown as dots. Genotypes were compared using ordinary one-way ANOVAs. There was no statistically significant difference in relative Eef1a1 mRNA quantities between genotypes [ F (2, 9)=0.2807, P =0.7616]. There was a statistically significant difference in relative Eef1a2 mRNA quantities between genotypes [ F (2, 9)=16.16, P =0.001]. *** P <0.001 (Dunnett's post-hoc test, +/+ versus other genotypes). (C) Representative Western blots of P24 brain, heart and muscle lysates showing eEF1A2 and a total protein stain. Brain lysates from wst/wst mice, homozygous for an Eef1a2 abolishing deletion , were used as a negative control for eEF1A2. Lysates from adult skeletal muscle were used as a positive control. Brightness and contrast settings were set separately for each blot shown for illustration purposes (applied to the whole image), but this did not affect the quantification using Image Studio Lite software. Western blots were performed in triplicate for each sex with values averaged across replicates. (D-I) Quantification of eEF1A2 levels, normalised to total protein and expressed as a percentage of wild-type expression levels, were compared using ordinary one-way ANOVAs. There were no statistically significant differences in relative eEF1A2 levels in male heart [E; F (2, 6)=1.595, P =0.2782] or female heart [H; F (2, 6)=1.949, P =0.2227]. There were statistically significant differences in relative eEF1A2 levels in male brain [D; F (2, 6)=13.32, P =0.0062], female brain [G; F (2, 6)=39.60, P =0.0003], male muscle [F; F (2, 6)=28.49, P =0.0009] and female muscle [I; F (2, 6)=39.76, P =0.0003]. ** P <0.01, *** P <0.001 (Dunnett's post-hoc test, +/+ versus other genotypes). Sample sizes are shown at the base of the bars. Error bars show the s.d. AU, arbitrary units.
Figure Legend Snippet: Eef1a expression analysis. (A,B) Mean Eef1a1 (A) and Eef1a2 (B) mRNA quantities in the brains of P24 mice in the E122K line, normalised to the geometric mean of Gapdh , Ubc and B2m transcript levels. Values for individual biological replicates are shown as dots. Genotypes were compared using ordinary one-way ANOVAs. There was no statistically significant difference in relative Eef1a1 mRNA quantities between genotypes [ F (2, 9)=0.2807, P =0.7616]. There was a statistically significant difference in relative Eef1a2 mRNA quantities between genotypes [ F (2, 9)=16.16, P =0.001]. *** P <0.001 (Dunnett's post-hoc test, +/+ versus other genotypes). (C) Representative Western blots of P24 brain, heart and muscle lysates showing eEF1A2 and a total protein stain. Brain lysates from wst/wst mice, homozygous for an Eef1a2 abolishing deletion , were used as a negative control for eEF1A2. Lysates from adult skeletal muscle were used as a positive control. Brightness and contrast settings were set separately for each blot shown for illustration purposes (applied to the whole image), but this did not affect the quantification using Image Studio Lite software. Western blots were performed in triplicate for each sex with values averaged across replicates. (D-I) Quantification of eEF1A2 levels, normalised to total protein and expressed as a percentage of wild-type expression levels, were compared using ordinary one-way ANOVAs. There were no statistically significant differences in relative eEF1A2 levels in male heart [E; F (2, 6)=1.595, P =0.2782] or female heart [H; F (2, 6)=1.949, P =0.2227]. There were statistically significant differences in relative eEF1A2 levels in male brain [D; F (2, 6)=13.32, P =0.0062], female brain [G; F (2, 6)=39.60, P =0.0003], male muscle [F; F (2, 6)=28.49, P =0.0009] and female muscle [I; F (2, 6)=39.76, P =0.0003]. ** P <0.01, *** P <0.001 (Dunnett's post-hoc test, +/+ versus other genotypes). Sample sizes are shown at the base of the bars. Error bars show the s.d. AU, arbitrary units.

Techniques Used: Expressing, Western Blot, Staining, Negative Control, Positive Control, Software



Similar Products

86
Danaher Inc anti eef1a2 antibody
Anti Eef1a2 Antibody, supplied by Danaher Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/anti eef1a2 antibody/product/Danaher Inc
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti eef1a2 antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2025-03
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Danaher Inc eef1a2
Eef1a2, supplied by Danaher Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/eef1a2/product/Danaher Inc
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
eef1a2 - by Bioz Stars, 2025-03
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
GeneTex anti eef1a2 antibody
(a) Western blot of recombinant protein, protein extracts from the A549 cell line, and from normal human organs. reEF1A1 and reEF1A2 are recombinant proteins. Caption under organ name “1” and “2” mean two cases were examined for heart, lung and liver. (b) Western blot of A549 cells treated with <t>si‐eEF1A2.</t> Scrambled RNA was used for the negative control (NC). LUAD indicates lung adenocarcinoma tissues.
Anti Eef1a2 Antibody, supplied by GeneTex, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/anti eef1a2 antibody/product/GeneTex
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti eef1a2 antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2025-03
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Danaher Inc anti eef1a2
(a) Western blot of recombinant protein, protein extracts from the A549 cell line, and from normal human organs. reEF1A1 and reEF1A2 are recombinant proteins. Caption under organ name “1” and “2” mean two cases were examined for heart, lung and liver. (b) Western blot of A549 cells treated with <t>si‐eEF1A2.</t> Scrambled RNA was used for the negative control (NC). LUAD indicates lung adenocarcinoma tissues.
Anti Eef1a2, supplied by Danaher Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/anti eef1a2/product/Danaher Inc
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti eef1a2 - by Bioz Stars, 2025-03
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Abnova eef1a2 recombinant proteins
Eukaryotic elongation factor 1 alpha 2 expression and clinicopathological features in patients with lung adenocarcinoma.
Eef1a2 Recombinant Proteins, supplied by Abnova, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/eef1a2 recombinant proteins/product/Abnova
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
eef1a2 recombinant proteins - by Bioz Stars, 2025-03
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Proteintech antibody eef1a2
Eef1a expression analysis. (A,B) Mean Eef1a1 (A) and <t>Eef1a2</t> (B) mRNA quantities in the brains of P24 mice in the E122K line, normalised to the geometric mean of Gapdh , Ubc and B2m transcript levels. Values for individual biological replicates are shown as dots. Genotypes were compared using ordinary one-way ANOVAs. There was no statistically significant difference in relative Eef1a1 mRNA quantities between genotypes [ F (2, 9)=0.2807, P =0.7616]. There was a statistically significant difference in relative Eef1a2 mRNA quantities between genotypes [ F (2, 9)=16.16, P =0.001]. *** P <0.001 (Dunnett's post-hoc test, +/+ versus other genotypes). (C) Representative Western blots of P24 brain, heart and muscle lysates showing eEF1A2 and a total protein stain. Brain lysates from wst/wst mice, homozygous for an Eef1a2 abolishing deletion , were used as a negative control for eEF1A2. Lysates from adult skeletal muscle were used as a positive control. Brightness and contrast settings were set separately for each blot shown for illustration purposes (applied to the whole image), but this did not affect the quantification using Image Studio Lite software. Western blots were performed in triplicate for each sex with values averaged across replicates. (D-I) Quantification of eEF1A2 levels, normalised to total protein and expressed as a percentage of wild-type expression levels, were compared using ordinary one-way ANOVAs. There were no statistically significant differences in relative eEF1A2 levels in male heart [E; F (2, 6)=1.595, P =0.2782] or female heart [H; F (2, 6)=1.949, P =0.2227]. There were statistically significant differences in relative eEF1A2 levels in male brain [D; F (2, 6)=13.32, P =0.0062], female brain [G; F (2, 6)=39.60, P =0.0003], male muscle [F; F (2, 6)=28.49, P =0.0009] and female muscle [I; F (2, 6)=39.76, P =0.0003]. ** P <0.01, *** P <0.001 (Dunnett's post-hoc test, +/+ versus other genotypes). Sample sizes are shown at the base of the bars. Error bars show the s.d. AU, arbitrary units.
Antibody Eef1a2, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/antibody eef1a2/product/Proteintech
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
antibody eef1a2 - by Bioz Stars, 2025-03
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Proteintech custom rabbit anti eef1a2 primary antibody
Eef1a expression analysis. (A,B) Mean Eef1a1 (A) and <t>Eef1a2</t> (B) mRNA quantities in the brains of P24 mice in the E122K line, normalised to the geometric mean of Gapdh , Ubc and B2m transcript levels. Values for individual biological replicates are shown as dots. Genotypes were compared using ordinary one-way ANOVAs. There was no statistically significant difference in relative Eef1a1 mRNA quantities between genotypes [ F (2, 9)=0.2807, P =0.7616]. There was a statistically significant difference in relative Eef1a2 mRNA quantities between genotypes [ F (2, 9)=16.16, P =0.001]. *** P <0.001 (Dunnett's post-hoc test, +/+ versus other genotypes). (C) Representative Western blots of P24 brain, heart and muscle lysates showing eEF1A2 and a total protein stain. Brain lysates from wst/wst mice, homozygous for an Eef1a2 abolishing deletion , were used as a negative control for eEF1A2. Lysates from adult skeletal muscle were used as a positive control. Brightness and contrast settings were set separately for each blot shown for illustration purposes (applied to the whole image), but this did not affect the quantification using Image Studio Lite software. Western blots were performed in triplicate for each sex with values averaged across replicates. (D-I) Quantification of eEF1A2 levels, normalised to total protein and expressed as a percentage of wild-type expression levels, were compared using ordinary one-way ANOVAs. There were no statistically significant differences in relative eEF1A2 levels in male heart [E; F (2, 6)=1.595, P =0.2782] or female heart [H; F (2, 6)=1.949, P =0.2227]. There were statistically significant differences in relative eEF1A2 levels in male brain [D; F (2, 6)=13.32, P =0.0062], female brain [G; F (2, 6)=39.60, P =0.0003], male muscle [F; F (2, 6)=28.49, P =0.0009] and female muscle [I; F (2, 6)=39.76, P =0.0003]. ** P <0.01, *** P <0.001 (Dunnett's post-hoc test, +/+ versus other genotypes). Sample sizes are shown at the base of the bars. Error bars show the s.d. AU, arbitrary units.
Custom Rabbit Anti Eef1a2 Primary Antibody, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/custom rabbit anti eef1a2 primary antibody/product/Proteintech
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
custom rabbit anti eef1a2 primary antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2025-03
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Proteintech custom rabbit anti eef1a2 antibody
Eef1a expression analysis. (A,B) Mean Eef1a1 (A) and <t>Eef1a2</t> (B) mRNA quantities in the brains of P24 mice in the E122K line, normalised to the geometric mean of Gapdh , Ubc and B2m transcript levels. Values for individual biological replicates are shown as dots. Genotypes were compared using ordinary one-way ANOVAs. There was no statistically significant difference in relative Eef1a1 mRNA quantities between genotypes [ F (2, 9)=0.2807, P =0.7616]. There was a statistically significant difference in relative Eef1a2 mRNA quantities between genotypes [ F (2, 9)=16.16, P =0.001]. *** P <0.001 (Dunnett's post-hoc test, +/+ versus other genotypes). (C) Representative Western blots of P24 brain, heart and muscle lysates showing eEF1A2 and a total protein stain. Brain lysates from wst/wst mice, homozygous for an Eef1a2 abolishing deletion , were used as a negative control for eEF1A2. Lysates from adult skeletal muscle were used as a positive control. Brightness and contrast settings were set separately for each blot shown for illustration purposes (applied to the whole image), but this did not affect the quantification using Image Studio Lite software. Western blots were performed in triplicate for each sex with values averaged across replicates. (D-I) Quantification of eEF1A2 levels, normalised to total protein and expressed as a percentage of wild-type expression levels, were compared using ordinary one-way ANOVAs. There were no statistically significant differences in relative eEF1A2 levels in male heart [E; F (2, 6)=1.595, P =0.2782] or female heart [H; F (2, 6)=1.949, P =0.2227]. There were statistically significant differences in relative eEF1A2 levels in male brain [D; F (2, 6)=13.32, P =0.0062], female brain [G; F (2, 6)=39.60, P =0.0003], male muscle [F; F (2, 6)=28.49, P =0.0009] and female muscle [I; F (2, 6)=39.76, P =0.0003]. ** P <0.01, *** P <0.001 (Dunnett's post-hoc test, +/+ versus other genotypes). Sample sizes are shown at the base of the bars. Error bars show the s.d. AU, arbitrary units.
Custom Rabbit Anti Eef1a2 Antibody, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/custom rabbit anti eef1a2 antibody/product/Proteintech
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
custom rabbit anti eef1a2 antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2025-03
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


(a) Western blot of recombinant protein, protein extracts from the A549 cell line, and from normal human organs. reEF1A1 and reEF1A2 are recombinant proteins. Caption under organ name “1” and “2” mean two cases were examined for heart, lung and liver. (b) Western blot of A549 cells treated with si‐eEF1A2. Scrambled RNA was used for the negative control (NC). LUAD indicates lung adenocarcinoma tissues.

Journal: Pathology International

Article Title: High expression of eukaryotic elongation factor 1‐alpha‐2 in lung adenocarcinoma is associated with poor prognosis

doi: 10.1111/pin.13457

Figure Lengend Snippet: (a) Western blot of recombinant protein, protein extracts from the A549 cell line, and from normal human organs. reEF1A1 and reEF1A2 are recombinant proteins. Caption under organ name “1” and “2” mean two cases were examined for heart, lung and liver. (b) Western blot of A549 cells treated with si‐eEF1A2. Scrambled RNA was used for the negative control (NC). LUAD indicates lung adenocarcinoma tissues.

Article Snippet: To verify the specificity of the antibodies against eEF1A1 and eEF1A2, Western blotting was performed using monoclonal anti‐eEF1A1 antibody (ab157455; Abcam), polyclonal anti‐eEF1A2 antibody (GTX102326, GeneTex), and mouse monoclonal anti‐GAPDH antibody (sc‐32233, Santa Cruz Biotechnology). eEF1A1 and eEF1A2 recombinant proteins (Abnova) were used as positive controls.

Techniques: Western Blot, Recombinant, Negative Control

Immunohistochemistry of eukaryotic elongation factor 1 alpha 2 (eEF1A2) in normal lung tissue and in lung adenocarcinoma. (a) Normal lung tissue. (b) Adenocarcinoma in situ. (c) Solid adenocarcinoma with eEF1A2 expression.

Journal: Pathology International

Article Title: High expression of eukaryotic elongation factor 1‐alpha‐2 in lung adenocarcinoma is associated with poor prognosis

doi: 10.1111/pin.13457

Figure Lengend Snippet: Immunohistochemistry of eukaryotic elongation factor 1 alpha 2 (eEF1A2) in normal lung tissue and in lung adenocarcinoma. (a) Normal lung tissue. (b) Adenocarcinoma in situ. (c) Solid adenocarcinoma with eEF1A2 expression.

Article Snippet: To verify the specificity of the antibodies against eEF1A1 and eEF1A2, Western blotting was performed using monoclonal anti‐eEF1A1 antibody (ab157455; Abcam), polyclonal anti‐eEF1A2 antibody (GTX102326, GeneTex), and mouse monoclonal anti‐GAPDH antibody (sc‐32233, Santa Cruz Biotechnology). eEF1A1 and eEF1A2 recombinant proteins (Abnova) were used as positive controls.

Techniques: Immunohistochemistry, In Situ, Expressing

Kaplan‐Meier curve of disease‐free survival of patients with eukaryotic elongation factor 1 alpha 2 (eEF1A2).

Journal: Pathology International

Article Title: High expression of eukaryotic elongation factor 1‐alpha‐2 in lung adenocarcinoma is associated with poor prognosis

doi: 10.1111/pin.13457

Figure Lengend Snippet: Kaplan‐Meier curve of disease‐free survival of patients with eukaryotic elongation factor 1 alpha 2 (eEF1A2).

Article Snippet: To verify the specificity of the antibodies against eEF1A1 and eEF1A2, Western blotting was performed using monoclonal anti‐eEF1A1 antibody (ab157455; Abcam), polyclonal anti‐eEF1A2 antibody (GTX102326, GeneTex), and mouse monoclonal anti‐GAPDH antibody (sc‐32233, Santa Cruz Biotechnology). eEF1A1 and eEF1A2 recombinant proteins (Abnova) were used as positive controls.

Techniques:

Univariate and multivariate analysis of adenocarcinoma ( n = 175) using the Cox proportional hazards model.

Journal: Pathology International

Article Title: High expression of eukaryotic elongation factor 1‐alpha‐2 in lung adenocarcinoma is associated with poor prognosis

doi: 10.1111/pin.13457

Figure Lengend Snippet: Univariate and multivariate analysis of adenocarcinoma ( n = 175) using the Cox proportional hazards model.

Article Snippet: To verify the specificity of the antibodies against eEF1A1 and eEF1A2, Western blotting was performed using monoclonal anti‐eEF1A1 antibody (ab157455; Abcam), polyclonal anti‐eEF1A2 antibody (GTX102326, GeneTex), and mouse monoclonal anti‐GAPDH antibody (sc‐32233, Santa Cruz Biotechnology). eEF1A1 and eEF1A2 recombinant proteins (Abnova) were used as positive controls.

Techniques:

(a) Quantitative genomic PCR analysis of eukaryotic elongation factor 1 alpha 2 (eEF1A2) in lung adenocarcinoma. Five tumors immunohistochemically positive for eEF1A2 and two tumors immunohistochemically negative for eEF1A2 were subjected to the analysis. Each dot represents one tumor. A ratio (tumor/normal) of ≥1.5 was defined as representing gene amplification. (b) Fluorescence in situ hybridization of eEF1A2 in lung adenocarcinoma specimen. eEF1A2 amplification was detected in the tumor with increased expression of eEF1A2 DNA. Amplification of eEF1A2 was visualized as an increased number of red signals (eEF1A2) relative to green signals (Chromosome 20 centromeric probe: CEN20p).

Journal: Pathology International

Article Title: High expression of eukaryotic elongation factor 1‐alpha‐2 in lung adenocarcinoma is associated with poor prognosis

doi: 10.1111/pin.13457

Figure Lengend Snippet: (a) Quantitative genomic PCR analysis of eukaryotic elongation factor 1 alpha 2 (eEF1A2) in lung adenocarcinoma. Five tumors immunohistochemically positive for eEF1A2 and two tumors immunohistochemically negative for eEF1A2 were subjected to the analysis. Each dot represents one tumor. A ratio (tumor/normal) of ≥1.5 was defined as representing gene amplification. (b) Fluorescence in situ hybridization of eEF1A2 in lung adenocarcinoma specimen. eEF1A2 amplification was detected in the tumor with increased expression of eEF1A2 DNA. Amplification of eEF1A2 was visualized as an increased number of red signals (eEF1A2) relative to green signals (Chromosome 20 centromeric probe: CEN20p).

Article Snippet: To verify the specificity of the antibodies against eEF1A1 and eEF1A2, Western blotting was performed using monoclonal anti‐eEF1A1 antibody (ab157455; Abcam), polyclonal anti‐eEF1A2 antibody (GTX102326, GeneTex), and mouse monoclonal anti‐GAPDH antibody (sc‐32233, Santa Cruz Biotechnology). eEF1A1 and eEF1A2 recombinant proteins (Abnova) were used as positive controls.

Techniques: Amplification, Fluorescence, In Situ Hybridization, Expressing

Journal: Pathology International

Article Title: High expression of eukaryotic elongation factor 1‐alpha‐2 in lung adenocarcinoma is associated with poor prognosis

doi: 10.1111/pin.13457

Figure Lengend Snippet: Eukaryotic elongation factor 1 alpha 2 expression and clinicopathological features in patients with lung adenocarcinoma.

Article Snippet: To verify the specificity of the antibodies against eEF1A1 and eEF1A2, Western blotting was performed using monoclonal anti‐eEF1A1 antibody (ab157455; Abcam), polyclonal anti‐eEF1A2 antibody (GTX102326, GeneTex), and mouse monoclonal anti‐GAPDH antibody (sc‐32233, Santa Cruz Biotechnology). eEF1A1 and eEF1A2 recombinant proteins (Abnova) were used as positive controls.

Techniques: Expressing, In Situ

(a) Western blot of recombinant protein, protein extracts from the A549 cell line, and from normal human organs. reEF1A1 and reEF1A2 are recombinant proteins. Caption under organ name “1” and “2” mean two cases were examined for heart, lung and liver. (b) Western blot of A549 cells treated with si‐eEF1A2. Scrambled RNA was used for the negative control (NC). LUAD indicates lung adenocarcinoma tissues.

Journal: Pathology International

Article Title: High expression of eukaryotic elongation factor 1‐alpha‐2 in lung adenocarcinoma is associated with poor prognosis

doi: 10.1111/pin.13457

Figure Lengend Snippet: (a) Western blot of recombinant protein, protein extracts from the A549 cell line, and from normal human organs. reEF1A1 and reEF1A2 are recombinant proteins. Caption under organ name “1” and “2” mean two cases were examined for heart, lung and liver. (b) Western blot of A549 cells treated with si‐eEF1A2. Scrambled RNA was used for the negative control (NC). LUAD indicates lung adenocarcinoma tissues.

Article Snippet: To verify the specificity of the antibodies against eEF1A1 and eEF1A2, Western blotting was performed using monoclonal anti‐eEF1A1 antibody (ab157455; Abcam), polyclonal anti‐eEF1A2 antibody (GTX102326, GeneTex), and mouse monoclonal anti‐GAPDH antibody (sc‐32233, Santa Cruz Biotechnology). eEF1A1 and eEF1A2 recombinant proteins (Abnova) were used as positive controls.

Techniques: Western Blot, Recombinant, Negative Control

Immunohistochemistry of eukaryotic elongation factor 1 alpha 2 (eEF1A2) in normal lung tissue and in lung adenocarcinoma. (a) Normal lung tissue. (b) Adenocarcinoma in situ. (c) Solid adenocarcinoma with eEF1A2 expression.

Journal: Pathology International

Article Title: High expression of eukaryotic elongation factor 1‐alpha‐2 in lung adenocarcinoma is associated with poor prognosis

doi: 10.1111/pin.13457

Figure Lengend Snippet: Immunohistochemistry of eukaryotic elongation factor 1 alpha 2 (eEF1A2) in normal lung tissue and in lung adenocarcinoma. (a) Normal lung tissue. (b) Adenocarcinoma in situ. (c) Solid adenocarcinoma with eEF1A2 expression.

Article Snippet: To verify the specificity of the antibodies against eEF1A1 and eEF1A2, Western blotting was performed using monoclonal anti‐eEF1A1 antibody (ab157455; Abcam), polyclonal anti‐eEF1A2 antibody (GTX102326, GeneTex), and mouse monoclonal anti‐GAPDH antibody (sc‐32233, Santa Cruz Biotechnology). eEF1A1 and eEF1A2 recombinant proteins (Abnova) were used as positive controls.

Techniques: Immunohistochemistry, In Situ, Expressing

Kaplan‐Meier curve of disease‐free survival of patients with eukaryotic elongation factor 1 alpha 2 (eEF1A2).

Journal: Pathology International

Article Title: High expression of eukaryotic elongation factor 1‐alpha‐2 in lung adenocarcinoma is associated with poor prognosis

doi: 10.1111/pin.13457

Figure Lengend Snippet: Kaplan‐Meier curve of disease‐free survival of patients with eukaryotic elongation factor 1 alpha 2 (eEF1A2).

Article Snippet: To verify the specificity of the antibodies against eEF1A1 and eEF1A2, Western blotting was performed using monoclonal anti‐eEF1A1 antibody (ab157455; Abcam), polyclonal anti‐eEF1A2 antibody (GTX102326, GeneTex), and mouse monoclonal anti‐GAPDH antibody (sc‐32233, Santa Cruz Biotechnology). eEF1A1 and eEF1A2 recombinant proteins (Abnova) were used as positive controls.

Techniques:

Univariate and multivariate analysis of adenocarcinoma ( n = 175) using the Cox proportional hazards model.

Journal: Pathology International

Article Title: High expression of eukaryotic elongation factor 1‐alpha‐2 in lung adenocarcinoma is associated with poor prognosis

doi: 10.1111/pin.13457

Figure Lengend Snippet: Univariate and multivariate analysis of adenocarcinoma ( n = 175) using the Cox proportional hazards model.

Article Snippet: To verify the specificity of the antibodies against eEF1A1 and eEF1A2, Western blotting was performed using monoclonal anti‐eEF1A1 antibody (ab157455; Abcam), polyclonal anti‐eEF1A2 antibody (GTX102326, GeneTex), and mouse monoclonal anti‐GAPDH antibody (sc‐32233, Santa Cruz Biotechnology). eEF1A1 and eEF1A2 recombinant proteins (Abnova) were used as positive controls.

Techniques:

(a) Quantitative genomic PCR analysis of eukaryotic elongation factor 1 alpha 2 (eEF1A2) in lung adenocarcinoma. Five tumors immunohistochemically positive for eEF1A2 and two tumors immunohistochemically negative for eEF1A2 were subjected to the analysis. Each dot represents one tumor. A ratio (tumor/normal) of ≥1.5 was defined as representing gene amplification. (b) Fluorescence in situ hybridization of eEF1A2 in lung adenocarcinoma specimen. eEF1A2 amplification was detected in the tumor with increased expression of eEF1A2 DNA. Amplification of eEF1A2 was visualized as an increased number of red signals (eEF1A2) relative to green signals (Chromosome 20 centromeric probe: CEN20p).

Journal: Pathology International

Article Title: High expression of eukaryotic elongation factor 1‐alpha‐2 in lung adenocarcinoma is associated with poor prognosis

doi: 10.1111/pin.13457

Figure Lengend Snippet: (a) Quantitative genomic PCR analysis of eukaryotic elongation factor 1 alpha 2 (eEF1A2) in lung adenocarcinoma. Five tumors immunohistochemically positive for eEF1A2 and two tumors immunohistochemically negative for eEF1A2 were subjected to the analysis. Each dot represents one tumor. A ratio (tumor/normal) of ≥1.5 was defined as representing gene amplification. (b) Fluorescence in situ hybridization of eEF1A2 in lung adenocarcinoma specimen. eEF1A2 amplification was detected in the tumor with increased expression of eEF1A2 DNA. Amplification of eEF1A2 was visualized as an increased number of red signals (eEF1A2) relative to green signals (Chromosome 20 centromeric probe: CEN20p).

Article Snippet: To verify the specificity of the antibodies against eEF1A1 and eEF1A2, Western blotting was performed using monoclonal anti‐eEF1A1 antibody (ab157455; Abcam), polyclonal anti‐eEF1A2 antibody (GTX102326, GeneTex), and mouse monoclonal anti‐GAPDH antibody (sc‐32233, Santa Cruz Biotechnology). eEF1A1 and eEF1A2 recombinant proteins (Abnova) were used as positive controls.

Techniques: Amplification, Fluorescence, In Situ Hybridization, Expressing

Eef1a expression analysis. (A,B) Mean Eef1a1 (A) and Eef1a2 (B) mRNA quantities in the brains of P24 mice in the E122K line, normalised to the geometric mean of Gapdh , Ubc and B2m transcript levels. Values for individual biological replicates are shown as dots. Genotypes were compared using ordinary one-way ANOVAs. There was no statistically significant difference in relative Eef1a1 mRNA quantities between genotypes [ F (2, 9)=0.2807, P =0.7616]. There was a statistically significant difference in relative Eef1a2 mRNA quantities between genotypes [ F (2, 9)=16.16, P =0.001]. *** P <0.001 (Dunnett's post-hoc test, +/+ versus other genotypes). (C) Representative Western blots of P24 brain, heart and muscle lysates showing eEF1A2 and a total protein stain. Brain lysates from wst/wst mice, homozygous for an Eef1a2 abolishing deletion , were used as a negative control for eEF1A2. Lysates from adult skeletal muscle were used as a positive control. Brightness and contrast settings were set separately for each blot shown for illustration purposes (applied to the whole image), but this did not affect the quantification using Image Studio Lite software. Western blots were performed in triplicate for each sex with values averaged across replicates. (D-I) Quantification of eEF1A2 levels, normalised to total protein and expressed as a percentage of wild-type expression levels, were compared using ordinary one-way ANOVAs. There were no statistically significant differences in relative eEF1A2 levels in male heart [E; F (2, 6)=1.595, P =0.2782] or female heart [H; F (2, 6)=1.949, P =0.2227]. There were statistically significant differences in relative eEF1A2 levels in male brain [D; F (2, 6)=13.32, P =0.0062], female brain [G; F (2, 6)=39.60, P =0.0003], male muscle [F; F (2, 6)=28.49, P =0.0009] and female muscle [I; F (2, 6)=39.76, P =0.0003]. ** P <0.01, *** P <0.001 (Dunnett's post-hoc test, +/+ versus other genotypes). Sample sizes are shown at the base of the bars. Error bars show the s.d. AU, arbitrary units.

Journal: Disease Models & Mechanisms

Article Title: Face-valid phenotypes in a mouse model of the most common mutation in EEF1A2 -related neurodevelopmental disorder

doi: 10.1242/dmm.050501

Figure Lengend Snippet: Eef1a expression analysis. (A,B) Mean Eef1a1 (A) and Eef1a2 (B) mRNA quantities in the brains of P24 mice in the E122K line, normalised to the geometric mean of Gapdh , Ubc and B2m transcript levels. Values for individual biological replicates are shown as dots. Genotypes were compared using ordinary one-way ANOVAs. There was no statistically significant difference in relative Eef1a1 mRNA quantities between genotypes [ F (2, 9)=0.2807, P =0.7616]. There was a statistically significant difference in relative Eef1a2 mRNA quantities between genotypes [ F (2, 9)=16.16, P =0.001]. *** P <0.001 (Dunnett's post-hoc test, +/+ versus other genotypes). (C) Representative Western blots of P24 brain, heart and muscle lysates showing eEF1A2 and a total protein stain. Brain lysates from wst/wst mice, homozygous for an Eef1a2 abolishing deletion , were used as a negative control for eEF1A2. Lysates from adult skeletal muscle were used as a positive control. Brightness and contrast settings were set separately for each blot shown for illustration purposes (applied to the whole image), but this did not affect the quantification using Image Studio Lite software. Western blots were performed in triplicate for each sex with values averaged across replicates. (D-I) Quantification of eEF1A2 levels, normalised to total protein and expressed as a percentage of wild-type expression levels, were compared using ordinary one-way ANOVAs. There were no statistically significant differences in relative eEF1A2 levels in male heart [E; F (2, 6)=1.595, P =0.2782] or female heart [H; F (2, 6)=1.949, P =0.2227]. There were statistically significant differences in relative eEF1A2 levels in male brain [D; F (2, 6)=13.32, P =0.0062], female brain [G; F (2, 6)=39.60, P =0.0003], male muscle [F; F (2, 6)=28.49, P =0.0009] and female muscle [I; F (2, 6)=39.76, P =0.0003]. ** P <0.01, *** P <0.001 (Dunnett's post-hoc test, +/+ versus other genotypes). Sample sizes are shown at the base of the bars. Error bars show the s.d. AU, arbitrary units.

Article Snippet: The custom rabbit anti-eEF1A2 primary antibody was manufactured to order by Proteintech (UK), and was equivalent to antibody eEF1A2-1 described by .

Techniques: Expressing, Western Blot, Staining, Negative Control, Positive Control, Software

Eef1a expression analysis. (A,B) Mean Eef1a1 (A) and Eef1a2 (B) mRNA quantities in the brains of P24 mice in the E122K line, normalised to the geometric mean of Gapdh , Ubc and B2m transcript levels. Values for individual biological replicates are shown as dots. Genotypes were compared using ordinary one-way ANOVAs. There was no statistically significant difference in relative Eef1a1 mRNA quantities between genotypes [ F (2, 9)=0.2807, P =0.7616]. There was a statistically significant difference in relative Eef1a2 mRNA quantities between genotypes [ F (2, 9)=16.16, P =0.001]. *** P <0.001 (Dunnett's post-hoc test, +/+ versus other genotypes). (C) Representative Western blots of P24 brain, heart and muscle lysates showing eEF1A2 and a total protein stain. Brain lysates from wst/wst mice, homozygous for an Eef1a2 abolishing deletion , were used as a negative control for eEF1A2. Lysates from adult skeletal muscle were used as a positive control. Brightness and contrast settings were set separately for each blot shown for illustration purposes (applied to the whole image), but this did not affect the quantification using Image Studio Lite software. Western blots were performed in triplicate for each sex with values averaged across replicates. (D-I) Quantification of eEF1A2 levels, normalised to total protein and expressed as a percentage of wild-type expression levels, were compared using ordinary one-way ANOVAs. There were no statistically significant differences in relative eEF1A2 levels in male heart [E; F (2, 6)=1.595, P =0.2782] or female heart [H; F (2, 6)=1.949, P =0.2227]. There were statistically significant differences in relative eEF1A2 levels in male brain [D; F (2, 6)=13.32, P =0.0062], female brain [G; F (2, 6)=39.60, P =0.0003], male muscle [F; F (2, 6)=28.49, P =0.0009] and female muscle [I; F (2, 6)=39.76, P =0.0003]. ** P <0.01, *** P <0.001 (Dunnett's post-hoc test, +/+ versus other genotypes). Sample sizes are shown at the base of the bars. Error bars show the s.d. AU, arbitrary units.

Journal: Disease Models & Mechanisms

Article Title: Face-valid phenotypes in a mouse model of the most common mutation in EEF1A2 -related neurodevelopmental disorder

doi: 10.1242/dmm.050501

Figure Lengend Snippet: Eef1a expression analysis. (A,B) Mean Eef1a1 (A) and Eef1a2 (B) mRNA quantities in the brains of P24 mice in the E122K line, normalised to the geometric mean of Gapdh , Ubc and B2m transcript levels. Values for individual biological replicates are shown as dots. Genotypes were compared using ordinary one-way ANOVAs. There was no statistically significant difference in relative Eef1a1 mRNA quantities between genotypes [ F (2, 9)=0.2807, P =0.7616]. There was a statistically significant difference in relative Eef1a2 mRNA quantities between genotypes [ F (2, 9)=16.16, P =0.001]. *** P <0.001 (Dunnett's post-hoc test, +/+ versus other genotypes). (C) Representative Western blots of P24 brain, heart and muscle lysates showing eEF1A2 and a total protein stain. Brain lysates from wst/wst mice, homozygous for an Eef1a2 abolishing deletion , were used as a negative control for eEF1A2. Lysates from adult skeletal muscle were used as a positive control. Brightness and contrast settings were set separately for each blot shown for illustration purposes (applied to the whole image), but this did not affect the quantification using Image Studio Lite software. Western blots were performed in triplicate for each sex with values averaged across replicates. (D-I) Quantification of eEF1A2 levels, normalised to total protein and expressed as a percentage of wild-type expression levels, were compared using ordinary one-way ANOVAs. There were no statistically significant differences in relative eEF1A2 levels in male heart [E; F (2, 6)=1.595, P =0.2782] or female heart [H; F (2, 6)=1.949, P =0.2227]. There were statistically significant differences in relative eEF1A2 levels in male brain [D; F (2, 6)=13.32, P =0.0062], female brain [G; F (2, 6)=39.60, P =0.0003], male muscle [F; F (2, 6)=28.49, P =0.0009] and female muscle [I; F (2, 6)=39.76, P =0.0003]. ** P <0.01, *** P <0.001 (Dunnett's post-hoc test, +/+ versus other genotypes). Sample sizes are shown at the base of the bars. Error bars show the s.d. AU, arbitrary units.

Article Snippet: The custom rabbit anti-eEF1A2 primary antibody was manufactured to order by Proteintech (UK), and was equivalent to antibody eEF1A2-1 described by .

Techniques: Expressing, Western Blot, Staining, Negative Control, Positive Control, Software