antibody eef1a2 (Proteintech)
Structured Review
![Eef1a expression analysis. (A,B) Mean Eef1a1 (A) and <t>Eef1a2</t> (B) mRNA quantities in the brains of P24 mice in the E122K line, normalised to the geometric mean of Gapdh , Ubc and B2m transcript levels. Values for individual biological replicates are shown as dots. Genotypes were compared using ordinary one-way ANOVAs. There was no statistically significant difference in relative Eef1a1 mRNA quantities between genotypes [ F (2, 9)=0.2807, P =0.7616]. There was a statistically significant difference in relative Eef1a2 mRNA quantities between genotypes [ F (2, 9)=16.16, P =0.001]. *** P <0.001 (Dunnett's post-hoc test, +/+ versus other genotypes). (C) Representative Western blots of P24 brain, heart and muscle lysates showing eEF1A2 and a total protein stain. Brain lysates from wst/wst mice, homozygous for an Eef1a2 abolishing deletion , were used as a negative control for eEF1A2. Lysates from adult skeletal muscle were used as a positive control. Brightness and contrast settings were set separately for each blot shown for illustration purposes (applied to the whole image), but this did not affect the quantification using Image Studio Lite software. Western blots were performed in triplicate for each sex with values averaged across replicates. (D-I) Quantification of eEF1A2 levels, normalised to total protein and expressed as a percentage of wild-type expression levels, were compared using ordinary one-way ANOVAs. There were no statistically significant differences in relative eEF1A2 levels in male heart [E; F (2, 6)=1.595, P =0.2782] or female heart [H; F (2, 6)=1.949, P =0.2227]. There were statistically significant differences in relative eEF1A2 levels in male brain [D; F (2, 6)=13.32, P =0.0062], female brain [G; F (2, 6)=39.60, P =0.0003], male muscle [F; F (2, 6)=28.49, P =0.0009] and female muscle [I; F (2, 6)=39.76, P =0.0003]. ** P <0.01, *** P <0.001 (Dunnett's post-hoc test, +/+ versus other genotypes). Sample sizes are shown at the base of the bars. Error bars show the s.d. AU, arbitrary units.](https://pub-med-central-images-cdn.bioz.com/pub_med_central_ids_ending_with_5229/pmc10855229/pmc10855229__dmm-17-050501-g1.jpg)
Antibody Eef1a2, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/antibody eef1a2/product/Proteintech
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Face-valid phenotypes in a mouse model of the most common mutation in EEF1A2 -related neurodevelopmental disorder"
Article Title: Face-valid phenotypes in a mouse model of the most common mutation in EEF1A2 -related neurodevelopmental disorder
Journal: Disease Models & Mechanisms
doi: 10.1242/dmm.050501
![Eef1a expression analysis. (A,B) Mean Eef1a1 (A) and Eef1a2 (B) mRNA quantities in the brains of P24 ... Eef1a expression analysis. (A,B) Mean Eef1a1 (A) and Eef1a2 (B) mRNA quantities in the brains of P24 mice in the E122K line, normalised to the geometric mean of Gapdh , Ubc and B2m transcript levels. Values for individual biological replicates are shown as dots. Genotypes were compared using ordinary one-way ANOVAs. There was no statistically significant difference in relative Eef1a1 mRNA quantities between genotypes [ F (2, 9)=0.2807, P =0.7616]. There was a statistically significant difference in relative Eef1a2 mRNA quantities between genotypes [ F (2, 9)=16.16, P =0.001]. *** P <0.001 (Dunnett's post-hoc test, +/+ versus other genotypes). (C) Representative Western blots of P24 brain, heart and muscle lysates showing eEF1A2 and a total protein stain. Brain lysates from wst/wst mice, homozygous for an Eef1a2 abolishing deletion , were used as a negative control for eEF1A2. Lysates from adult skeletal muscle were used as a positive control. Brightness and contrast settings were set separately for each blot shown for illustration purposes (applied to the whole image), but this did not affect the quantification using Image Studio Lite software. Western blots were performed in triplicate for each sex with values averaged across replicates. (D-I) Quantification of eEF1A2 levels, normalised to total protein and expressed as a percentage of wild-type expression levels, were compared using ordinary one-way ANOVAs. There were no statistically significant differences in relative eEF1A2 levels in male heart [E; F (2, 6)=1.595, P =0.2782] or female heart [H; F (2, 6)=1.949, P =0.2227]. There were statistically significant differences in relative eEF1A2 levels in male brain [D; F (2, 6)=13.32, P =0.0062], female brain [G; F (2, 6)=39.60, P =0.0003], male muscle [F; F (2, 6)=28.49, P =0.0009] and female muscle [I; F (2, 6)=39.76, P =0.0003]. ** P <0.01, *** P <0.001 (Dunnett's post-hoc test, +/+ versus other genotypes). Sample sizes are shown at the base of the bars. Error bars show the s.d. AU, arbitrary units.](https://pub-med-central-images-cdn.bioz.com/pub_med_central_ids_ending_with_5229/pmc10855229/pmc10855229__dmm-17-050501-g1.jpg)
Figure Legend Snippet: Eef1a expression analysis. (A,B) Mean Eef1a1 (A) and Eef1a2 (B) mRNA quantities in the brains of P24 mice in the E122K line, normalised to the geometric mean of Gapdh , Ubc and B2m transcript levels. Values for individual biological replicates are shown as dots. Genotypes were compared using ordinary one-way ANOVAs. There was no statistically significant difference in relative Eef1a1 mRNA quantities between genotypes [ F (2, 9)=0.2807, P =0.7616]. There was a statistically significant difference in relative Eef1a2 mRNA quantities between genotypes [ F (2, 9)=16.16, P =0.001]. *** P <0.001 (Dunnett's post-hoc test, +/+ versus other genotypes). (C) Representative Western blots of P24 brain, heart and muscle lysates showing eEF1A2 and a total protein stain. Brain lysates from wst/wst mice, homozygous for an Eef1a2 abolishing deletion , were used as a negative control for eEF1A2. Lysates from adult skeletal muscle were used as a positive control. Brightness and contrast settings were set separately for each blot shown for illustration purposes (applied to the whole image), but this did not affect the quantification using Image Studio Lite software. Western blots were performed in triplicate for each sex with values averaged across replicates. (D-I) Quantification of eEF1A2 levels, normalised to total protein and expressed as a percentage of wild-type expression levels, were compared using ordinary one-way ANOVAs. There were no statistically significant differences in relative eEF1A2 levels in male heart [E; F (2, 6)=1.595, P =0.2782] or female heart [H; F (2, 6)=1.949, P =0.2227]. There were statistically significant differences in relative eEF1A2 levels in male brain [D; F (2, 6)=13.32, P =0.0062], female brain [G; F (2, 6)=39.60, P =0.0003], male muscle [F; F (2, 6)=28.49, P =0.0009] and female muscle [I; F (2, 6)=39.76, P =0.0003]. ** P <0.01, *** P <0.001 (Dunnett's post-hoc test, +/+ versus other genotypes). Sample sizes are shown at the base of the bars. Error bars show the s.d. AU, arbitrary units.
Techniques Used: Expressing, Western Blot, Staining, Negative Control, Positive Control, Software