synthetic sars cov 2 rna (ATCC)
ATCC is a verified supplier
ATCC manufactures this product
Structured Review
Synthetic Sars Cov 2 Rna, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/synthetic sars cov 2 rna/product/ATCC
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
Images
1) Product Images from "An Ultrafast One-Step Quantitative Reverse Transcription–Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay for Detection of SARS-CoV-2"
Article Title: An Ultrafast One-Step Quantitative Reverse Transcription–Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay for Detection of SARS-CoV-2
Journal: Frontiers in Microbiology
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.749783
Figure Legend Snippet: Workflow of ultrafast one-step qRT-PCR with comparison with conventional qRT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 detection.
Techniques Used: Quantitative RT-PCR
Figure Legend Snippet: Limit of detection of ultrafast one-step qRT-PCR assay. SARS-Cov-2 synthetic RNA genome was used as a model sample. RNA templates were series diluted in the range of 25–1 × 10 5 copies. Ultrafast one-step qRT-PCR assay detects both N1 (A) and N2 (B) regions of the nucleocapsid gene of SARS-CoV-2.
Techniques Used: Quantitative RT-PCR
Figure Legend Snippet: Cycle threshold (Ct values) of N1 and N2 correlation of ultrafast one-step qRT-PCR with FDA-approved assay “Xpert ® Xpress SARS-CoV-2” for SARS-CoV-2 positive samples. (A) Ct value of N1 and (B) Ct value of N2 from the 30 SARS-CoV-2 positive samples.
Techniques Used: Quantitative RT-PCR
synthetic sars cov 2 rna (ATCC)
ATCC is a verified supplier
ATCC manufactures this product
Structured Review
Synthetic Sars Cov 2 Rna, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/synthetic sars cov 2 rna/product/ATCC
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
Images
1) Product Images from "An Ultrafast One-Step Quantitative Reverse Transcription–Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay for Detection of SARS-CoV-2"
Article Title: An Ultrafast One-Step Quantitative Reverse Transcription–Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay for Detection of SARS-CoV-2
Journal: Frontiers in Microbiology
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.749783
Figure Legend Snippet: Workflow of ultrafast one-step qRT-PCR with comparison with conventional qRT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 detection.
Techniques Used: Quantitative RT-PCR
Figure Legend Snippet: Limit of detection of ultrafast one-step qRT-PCR assay. SARS-Cov-2 synthetic RNA genome was used as a model sample. RNA templates were series diluted in the range of 25–1 × 10 5 copies. Ultrafast one-step qRT-PCR assay detects both N1 (A) and N2 (B) regions of the nucleocapsid gene of SARS-CoV-2.
Techniques Used: Quantitative RT-PCR
Figure Legend Snippet: Cycle threshold (Ct values) of N1 and N2 correlation of ultrafast one-step qRT-PCR with FDA-approved assay “Xpert ® Xpress SARS-CoV-2” for SARS-CoV-2 positive samples. (A) Ct value of N1 and (B) Ct value of N2 from the 30 SARS-CoV-2 positive samples.
Techniques Used: Quantitative RT-PCR
synthetic sars cov 2 rna (ATCC)
ATCC is a verified supplier
ATCC manufactures this product
Structured Review
Synthetic Sars Cov 2 Rna, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/synthetic sars cov 2 rna/product/ATCC
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
Images
1) Product Images from "An Ultrafast One-Step Quantitative Reverse Transcription–Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay for Detection of SARS-CoV-2"
Article Title: An Ultrafast One-Step Quantitative Reverse Transcription–Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay for Detection of SARS-CoV-2
Journal: Frontiers in Microbiology
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.749783
Figure Legend Snippet: Workflow of ultrafast one-step qRT-PCR with comparison with conventional qRT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 detection.
Techniques Used: Quantitative RT-PCR
Figure Legend Snippet: Limit of detection of ultrafast one-step qRT-PCR assay. SARS-Cov-2 synthetic RNA genome was used as a model sample. RNA templates were series diluted in the range of 25–1 × 10 5 copies. Ultrafast one-step qRT-PCR assay detects both N1 (A) and N2 (B) regions of the nucleocapsid gene of SARS-CoV-2.
Techniques Used: Quantitative RT-PCR
Figure Legend Snippet: Cycle threshold (Ct values) of N1 and N2 correlation of ultrafast one-step qRT-PCR with FDA-approved assay “Xpert ® Xpress SARS-CoV-2” for SARS-CoV-2 positive samples. (A) Ct value of N1 and (B) Ct value of N2 from the 30 SARS-CoV-2 positive samples.
Techniques Used: Quantitative RT-PCR
synthetic sars cov 2 rna (ATCC)
ATCC is a verified supplier
ATCC manufactures this product
Structured Review
Synthetic Sars Cov 2 Rna, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/synthetic sars cov 2 rna/product/ATCC
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
Images
sars cov 2 rna (ATCC)
ATCC is a verified supplier
ATCC manufactures this product
Structured Review
Sars Cov 2 Rna, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/sars cov 2 rna/product/ATCC
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
Images
synthetic sars cov 2 rna control (ATCC)
ATCC is a verified supplier
ATCC manufactures this product
Structured Review
Synthetic Sars Cov 2 Rna Control, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/synthetic sars cov 2 rna control/product/ATCC
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
Images
1) Product Images from "Saliva TwoStep for rapid detection of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 carriers"
Article Title: Saliva TwoStep for rapid detection of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 carriers
Journal: medRxiv
doi: 10.1101/2020.07.16.20150250
Figure Legend Snippet: A) Three RT-LAMP primer sets targeting the SARS-CoV-2 genome (AS1E , ORF1e, and CU-N2) were tested with real-time RT-LAMP. Saliva was mixed 1:1 with 2X saliva stabilization solution, heated at 95°C for 10 minutes, and then spiked with in vitro transcribed SARS-CoV-2 RNA at the indicated concentrations. 4 μL of this was added to a master mix containing primers and NEB’s WarmStart LAMP 2x Master Mix in a final reaction volume of 20 μL. Reactions were incubated at 65°C and a fluorescence reading was taken every 30 seconds. EvaGreen was used to monitor amplification products in real-time (X-axis) using a QuantStudio3 quantitative PCR machine. There are 9 lines for each of the three primer sets because three concentrations of spiked in SARS-CoV-2 RNA were each tested in triplicate (0, 400, 800 copies / μL saliva). The saliva samples without SARS-CoV-2 RNA spike in are shown as flat lines. When concentrations are given herein, denominator refers to the raw, pre-diluted saliva sample. The normalized change in fluorescence signal (ΔRn) is shown on the Y-axis. B) Saliva mixed 1:1 with 2X saliva stabilization solution was heated (95°C for 10 minutes) and then spiked with SARS-CoV-2 RNA at the indicated concentrations. Replicates were tested by RT-LAMP with the control RNaseP primer set and three distinct SARS-CoV-2 primer sets (AS1E, ORF1e, and CU-N2). All samples scored positive except those boxed, which are saliva samples that contain no SARS-CoV-2 RNA, as expected.
Techniques Used: In Vitro, Incubation, Fluorescence, Amplification, Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction
Figure Legend Snippet: A) Saliva samples were spiked with the indicated concentrations of heat-inactivated SARS-CoV-2 virions (top) before being diluted 1:1 with 2X saliva stabilization solution. Samples were then heated at 95°C for 10 minutes and subjected to RT-LAMP at 65°C for 30 minutes in 6 replicates. Each panel represents a unique primer set (listed at the bottom of each panel). The table at the bottom shows a summary of positive reactions observed (yellow). Red box indicates the determined RT-LAMP limit of detection (LOD). B) Saliva samples were spiked with heat-inactivated SARS-CoV-2 virions at a concentration of 200 virions/μL (the limit of detection of our assay) before being diluted 1:1 with 2X saliva stabilization solution. Samples were then heated at 95°C for 10 minutes and 20 replicates of RT-LAMP with the indicated primer sets were incubated at 65°C for 30 minutes. The table at the bottom shows a summary of positive reactions (yellow). Red box indicates our selection of primer sets to advance to subsequent analysis.
Techniques Used: Concentration Assay, Incubation, Selection
Figure Legend Snippet: A) We re-analyzed university saliva samples that had been previously analyzed for SARS-CoV-2 using quantitative RT-PCR with a primer set against the N gene of SARS-CoV-2 (see ). The remaining saliva was mixed 1:1 with 2X saliva stabilization solution (without Proteinase K) and re-tested using RT-LAMP. The results of RT-LAMP are compared to relative saliva viral load determined by quantitative RT-PCR. The figure shows the distribution of the viral load of all 278 positive saliva samples separated by the corresponding RT-LAMP reaction results with either the AS1E or CU-N2 primer-set. B) Saliva TwoStep RT-LAMP test sensitivity as a function of the cycle threshold (Ct) from the quantitative RT-PCR results of the corresponding SARS-CoV-2 positive saliva samples. C) A summary of the sensitivity and specificity of the Saliva TwoStep test from the blinded sample evaluation described above and shown in (top), and from both the data in panel A (bottom).
Techniques Used: Quantitative RT-PCR
Figure Legend Snippet: (A) Matched nasal swabs and saliva from 54 individuals were analyzed (all of whom were SARS-CoV-2 positive at the time that these samples were collected, as verified by saliva direct quantitative RT-PCR test). Nasal swab samples from the same individuals were collected within 2 days of positive saliva test, and tested using the EUA Quidel Direct Lyra RT-PCR test. The saliva samples from those same individuals were tested with the Saliva TwoStep test. Data points represent individuals (n = 54), and the corresponding test result is color-coded: positive, yellow; negative, grey. (B) Positive test agreement between Saliva TwoStep and the two comparator tests. The nature of the sample used by each test (nasal swab or saliva), and the test chemistry (quantitative RT-PCR or RT-LAMP) are delineated.
Techniques Used: Quantitative RT-PCR, Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction
Figure Legend Snippet: Person provides 1 mL of saliva, and 1 mL of 2X saliva stabilization solution is then added to it. (This sample can be processed immediately or stored in the refrigerator at 4°C for at least 4 days.) The mixture is heated at 95°C for 10 minutes. This step serves to neutralize the pH of saliva, liberate viral RNA from virions in the saliva, and inactivate virions for safe handling (although appropriate safety precautions should always be taken). We have determined that performing a heating step at 95°C for 30 minutes in a water bath before addition of the saliva stabilization solution also works equally well. However, in this case Proteinase K must be left out of that solution. Lower half) Step 2: Detect Virus . 2 μL of stabilized saliva from step 1 is pipetted into each of three test tubes pre-filled with the RT-LAMP master mix and primers. The only thing different between the three tubes is the primer set included, with each set targeting either the human positive control RNA or a region of SARS-CoV-2 RNA, as indicated. After incubation, the reaction will turn from pink to yellow if the target RNA is present in saliva. An example of a positive and a negative test are shown. Graphic by Annika Rollock.
Techniques Used: Positive Control, Incubation
synthetic sars cov 2 rna control (ATCC)
ATCC is a verified supplier
ATCC manufactures this product
Structured Review
Synthetic Sars Cov 2 Rna Control, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/synthetic sars cov 2 rna control/product/ATCC
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
Images
1) Product Images from "Saliva TwoStep for rapid detection of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 carriers"
Article Title: Saliva TwoStep for rapid detection of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 carriers
Journal: medRxiv
doi: 10.1101/2020.07.16.20150250
Figure Legend Snippet: A) Three RT-LAMP primer sets targeting the SARS-CoV-2 genome (AS1E , ORF1e, and CU-N2) were tested with real-time RT-LAMP. Saliva was mixed 1:1 with 2X saliva stabilization solution, heated at 95°C for 10 minutes, and then spiked with in vitro transcribed SARS-CoV-2 RNA at the indicated concentrations. 4 μL of this was added to a master mix containing primers and NEB’s WarmStart LAMP 2x Master Mix in a final reaction volume of 20 μL. Reactions were incubated at 65°C and a fluorescence reading was taken every 30 seconds. EvaGreen was used to monitor amplification products in real-time (X-axis) using a QuantStudio3 quantitative PCR machine. There are 9 lines for each of the three primer sets because three concentrations of spiked in SARS-CoV-2 RNA were each tested in triplicate (0, 400, 800 copies / μL saliva). The saliva samples without SARS-CoV-2 RNA spike in are shown as flat lines. When concentrations are given herein, denominator refers to the raw, pre-diluted saliva sample. The normalized change in fluorescence signal (ΔRn) is shown on the Y-axis. B) Saliva mixed 1:1 with 2X saliva stabilization solution was heated (95°C for 10 minutes) and then spiked with SARS-CoV-2 RNA at the indicated concentrations. Replicates were tested by RT-LAMP with the control RNaseP primer set and three distinct SARS-CoV-2 primer sets (AS1E, ORF1e, and CU-N2). All samples scored positive except those boxed, which are saliva samples that contain no SARS-CoV-2 RNA, as expected.
Techniques Used: In Vitro, Incubation, Fluorescence, Amplification, Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction
Figure Legend Snippet: A) This experiment shows that heating at 95 ° C for 10 minutes degrades viral RNA when it is not in the form of virions. Saliva samples were diluted 1:1 with saliva stabilization solution. In vitro transcribed SASR-CoV-2 RNA was spiked into the diluted saliva to reach the indicated concentrations before (left) or after (right) the heating at 95°C for 10 minutes. To match other experiments, the indicated concentration represents the copies of SASR-CoV-2 RNA in the original undiluted saliva. The samples were then subjected to RT-LAMP at 65°C for 30 minutes. In this colorimetric version of RT-LAMP, reactions remain pink when no amplification occurred, and turned yellow if there was an amplification event. An RT-LAMP primer set targeting the human RNaseP transcript is included as a host RNA amplification control in addition to the three SARS-CoV-2 primer sets shown in panel A. B) This experiment shows that heating saliva at 95 ° C for 10 minutes does not degrades viral RNA when it is in the form of virions. Saliva samples were spiked with the indicated concentrations of heat-inactivated SARS-CoV-2 virions before being diluted 1:1 with saliva stabilization solution. Samples were then heated at 95°C for 10 minutes and subjected to RT-LAMP similarly to the experiment shown in panel A. C) Results illustrate the optimal incubation time at 95 ° C to liberate SARS-CoV-2 RNA from virions. Saliva samples were spiked with the indicated concentrations of heat-inactivated SARS-CoV-2 virions before being diluted 1:1 with saliva stabilization solution. Samples were then heated at 95°C for the indicated amount of time, and subjected to RT-LAMP similarly to the experiment shown in panel B. Without heating, no SARS-CoV-2 RNA can be detected with RT-LAMP, presumably because virions remain intact and the viral RNA is not accessible by the amplification enzymes. Amplification is somewhat inconsistent at 5 and 30 minutes possibly because at 5 minutes hardly any RNA has been liberated, and by 30 minutes it has been largely degraded. However, 10 or 15 minutes at 95 ° C appears to provide just the right balance between liberating and preserving RNA. All reactions contain the AS1E primer set. Duplicates are presented at each time point.
Techniques Used: In Vitro, Concentration Assay, Amplification, Incubation, Preserving
Figure Legend Snippet: A) Schematic of the experimental conditions. B) RT-LAMP reaction result before and after the isothermal amplification. Saliva samples were spiked with heat-inactivated SARS-CoV-2 virions at the indicated concentration and mixed 1:1 with saliva stabilization solution or nuclease-free water before/after storing at 4 °C for 24, 48, 72 and 96 hours. Samples were then heated at 95°C for 10 minutes and analyzed using RT-LAMP with the indicated primer sets. Condition C, which is the condition used in our test, performs robustly and is sensitive to the limit of detection even after 96 hours storage at 4 ° C. The stated limit of detection of 200 virions/μL is boxed.
Techniques Used: Amplification, Concentration Assay
Figure Legend Snippet: A) Saliva samples were spiked with the indicated concentrations of heat-inactivated SARS-CoV-2 virions (top) before being diluted 1:1 with 2X saliva stabilization solution. Samples were then heated at 95°C for 10 minutes and subjected to RT-LAMP at 65°C for 30 minutes in 6 replicates. Each panel represents a unique primer set (listed at the bottom of each panel). The table at the bottom shows a summary of positive reactions observed (yellow). Red box indicates the determined RT-LAMP limit of detection (LOD). B) Saliva samples were spiked with heat-inactivated SARS-CoV-2 virions at a concentration of 200 virions/μL (the limit of detection of our assay) before being diluted 1:1 with 2X saliva stabilization solution. Samples were then heated at 95°C for 10 minutes and 20 replicates of RT-LAMP with the indicated primer sets were incubated at 65°C for 30 minutes. The table at the bottom shows a summary of positive reactions (yellow). Red box indicates our selection of primer sets to advance to subsequent analysis.
Techniques Used: Concentration Assay, Incubation, Selection
Figure Legend Snippet: A) Here, the detection limit of Saliva TwoStep RT-LAMP assay, in the absence of any saliva or saliva stabilization solution, was assessed. This was explored in order to determine whether there might be components of saliva or saliva stabilization solution that inherently lower test sensitivity because they are inhibitory to the RT-LAMP reaction. Here, synthetic SARS-CoV-2 RNA was diluted in nuclease-free water. The diluted RNA was mixed with RT-LAMP reaction mix and incubated at 65°C for 30 minutes to allow isothermal amplification. Positive reactions turn yellow. Two different primer sets that amplify SARS-CoV-2 were employed, AS1E and CU-N2. The red box indicates the concentration at which positives were identified at least 95% of the time (here, 100% is achieved). That is defined at the limit of detection. Here, it is 200 copies/μL, just as when saliva and saliva stabilization solution is used (see panel B, and data figures in main paper). B) Evaluation of RT-LAMP detection limit in the presence of saliva, but in the presence or absence of saliva stabilization solution. Saliva spiked with heat inactivated SARS-CoV-2 virions at specified concentrations was mixed 1:1 with stabilization solution (left) or nuclease-free water (right) and heated at 95°C for 10 minutes (RNA liberation) before being incubated at 65°C for 30 minutes (isothermal amplification). On the left, the saliva stabilization solution achieves a limit of detection of 200 virions /μL. When virions are boiled without the saliva stabilization solution (right), very few reactions turn positive and the pattern is unpredictable, presumably because virions and viral RNA are destroyed.
Techniques Used: RT Lamp Assay, Incubation, Amplification, Concentration Assay
Figure Legend Snippet: Plain saliva, or saliva spiked with heat-inactivated SARS-CoV-2 virions at different concentrations, was heated at 95°C for 10 minutes. Samples were then analyzed using RT-LAMP by a researcher that did not know the true state of each sample. Experiments in figure) For each sample, three reactions were performed as indicated by each triplet of tubes. By looking at the patterns of yellow and pink results in each triplet, samples were scored according to the table below. The true status and observed result of each sample are listed to the right (P = Positive, N = Negative, I = Inconclusive). A white box on the triplet is shown if the sample contained SARS-CoV-2. One sample resulted in inconclusive test result. This sample did have SARS-CoV-2 spiked into it, but one of the SARS-CoV-2 primer sets failed to produce a signal (CU-N2). This failed reaction is still pink (negative) even though the tube has 2xLOD virus. 1X LOD = 200 virions/μL. Summary statistics for this experiment are provided in second and third tables below.
Techniques Used:
Figure Legend Snippet: A) We re-analyzed university saliva samples that had been previously analyzed for SARS-CoV-2 using quantitative RT-PCR with a primer set against the N gene of SARS-CoV-2 (see methods). The remaining saliva was mixed 1:1 with 2X saliva stabilization solution (without Proteinase K) and re-tested using RT-LAMP. The results of RT-LAMP are compared to relative saliva viral load determined by quantitative RT-PCR. The figure shows the distribution of the viral load of all 278 positive saliva samples separated by the corresponding RT-LAMP reaction results with either the AS1E or CU-N2 primer-set. B) Saliva TwoStep RT-LAMP test sensitivity as a function of the cycle threshold (Ct) from the quantitative RT-PCR results of the corresponding SARS-CoV-2 positive saliva samples. C) A summary of the sensitivity and specificity of the Saliva TwoStep test from the blinded sample evaluation described above and shown in Supplemental Figure S4 (top), and from both the data in panel A (bottom).
Techniques Used: Quantitative RT-PCR
Figure Legend Snippet: 10,000 copies/µL of heat deactivated SARS-CoV-2 virus was spiked into negative saliva specimens from 6 different volunteers and incubated for 30 minutes at 95°C. Samples were diluted to indicated concentrations using heat-treated saliva without SARS-CoV-2 addition from the same individual. The standard curve for the primer set targeting SARS-CoV-2 N gene is generated from the linear regression analysis and is illustrated with 95% confidence interval.
Techniques Used: Incubation, Generated
Figure Legend Snippet: (A) Matched nasal swabs and saliva from 54 individuals were analyzed (all of whom were SARS-CoV-2 positive at the time that these samples were collected, as verified by saliva direct quantitative RT-PCR test). Nasal swab samples from the same individuals were collected within 2 days of positive saliva test, and tested using the EUA Quidel Direct Lyra RT-PCR test. The saliva samples from those same individuals were tested with the Saliva TwoStep test. Data points represent individuals (n = 54), and the corresponding test result is color-coded: positive, yellow; negative, grey. (B) Positive test agreement between Saliva TwoStep and the two comparator tests. The nature of the sample used by each test (nasal swab or saliva), and the test chemistry (quantitative RT-PCR or RT-LAMP) are delineated.
Techniques Used: Quantitative RT-PCR, Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction
Figure Legend Snippet: Person provides 1 mL of saliva, and 1 mL of 2X saliva stabilization solution is then added to it. (This sample can be processed immediately or stored in the refrigerator at 4 ° C for at least 4 days.) The mixture is heated at 95 ° C for 10 minutes. This step serves to neutralize the pH of saliva, liberate viral RNA from virions in the saliva, and inactivate virions for safe handling (although appropriate safety precautions should always be taken). We have determined that performing a heating step at 95 ° C for 30 minutes in a water bath before addition of the saliva stabilization solution also works equally well. However, in this case Proteinase K must be left out of that solution. Lower half) Step 2: Detect Virus . 2 μL of stabilized saliva from step 1 is pipetted into each of three test tubes pre-filled with the RT-LAMP master mix and primers. The only thing different between the three tubes is the primer set included, with each set targeting either the human positive control RNA or a region of SARS-CoV-2 RNA, as indicated. After incubation, the reaction will turn from pink to yellow if the target RNA is present in saliva. An example of a positive and a negative test are shown. Graphic by Annika Rollock.
Techniques Used: Positive Control, Incubation
Figure Legend Snippet: A) Genome map of SARS-CoV-2 with the regions targeted RT-LAMP primers highlighted in red. SARS-CoV-2 genome map is adapted from BioRender. B) Sequence alignments of regions of the key SARS-CoV-2 genome variants targeted by RT-LAMP primer sets AS1E and CU-N2. Binding regions of each individual primer set component is highlighted in underlying horizontal bars. The SARS-CoV-2 genome region targeted by AS1E primer set is conserved among all variants. For CU-N2, the red box highlights region of sequence variation that might render CU-N2 primer set less effective to identify the UK and Brazil variants. The coordinate of the genome sequence is based on the SARS-CoV-2 reference genome (NCBI NC_045512.2). The SARS-CoV-2 variant representative genomes are downloaded from GISAID (South Africa Variant B.1.351: hCoV-19/South Africa/KRISP-EC-K004572/2020; UK Variant B.1.1.7: hCoV-19/England/MILK-9E2FE0/2020; Brazil Variant P.1: hCoV-19/USA/VA-DCLS-2185/2020).
Techniques Used: Sequencing, Binding Assay, Variant Assay