Review



ef tu monoclonal antibody  (Hycult Biotech)


Bioz Verified Symbol Hycult Biotech is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Hycult Biotech manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 94

    Structured Review

    Hycult Biotech ef tu monoclonal antibody
    Ef Tu Monoclonal Antibody, supplied by Hycult Biotech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/ef tu monoclonal antibody/product/Hycult Biotech
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    ef tu monoclonal antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2025-05
    94/100 stars

    Images



    Similar Products

    94
    Hycult Biotech ef tu monoclonal antibody
    Ef Tu Monoclonal Antibody, supplied by Hycult Biotech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/ef tu monoclonal antibody/product/Hycult Biotech
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    ef tu monoclonal antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2025-05
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    Hycult Biotech ef-tu, e.coli, mab 900
    Ef Tu, E.Coli, Mab 900, supplied by Hycult Biotech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/ef-tu, e.coli, mab 900/product/Hycult Biotech
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    ef-tu, e.coli, mab 900 - by Bioz Stars, 2025-05
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    Hycult Biotech mouse anti ef tu antibody
    Mouse Anti Ef Tu Antibody, supplied by Hycult Biotech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse anti ef tu antibody/product/Hycult Biotech
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mouse anti ef tu antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2025-05
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    Hycult Biotech eftu
    Cyclic-di-GMP regulates ExlA secretion( A ). Intracellular c-di-GMP levels in IHMA::pSW196 (IHMA) and PAO1::pSW196 (PAO1). Both strains contained the chromosomal PcdrA-gfp (ASV) c fusion as fluorescent reporter of c-di-GMP levels. GFP fluorescence was recorded for 16 h and was normalized by OD 585 to assess bacterial growth. The results, in arbitrary units (A; U), represent the mean +/− SD of six replicates. ( B ). The areas under the curves (AUC) were deduced from data shown in ( A ). Bar: mean. The indicated p -value was calculated with the Student’s test. ( C , D ). Similar experiment using IHMA::pSW196 (IHMA), IHMA::pSW196- wspR* (c-di-GMP +) and IHMA::pSW196- PA2133 (c-di-GMP −). Gene expression was induced by arabinose 0.025%. Statistical differences between AUC were calculated with ANOVA ( p < 0.0001) followed by Dunnett’s test for comparison with IHMA. ( E ). ExlA contents of secretomes and bacteria for IHMA::pSW196 (WT), IHMA Δ exlBA , IHMA::pSW196- wspR* (c-di-GMP +) and IHMA::pSW196- PA2133 (c-di-GMP −). Secretomes were concentrated 100X and bacterial extracts 10X before Western blot analysis and incubation with <t>ExlA</t> <t>antibodies</t> (Cter and ΔCter). FliC and <t>EFTu</t> were used as loading controls for secretomes and bacterial extracts, respectively. ( F ). ExlA/control signal ratios in secretomes and bacterial extracts are shown for three independent Western blot experiments (color coded). ( G ). ExlA was quantified by ELISA in the secretomes of IHMAΔ erfA ::pSW196 (Δ erfA ), IHMAΔ erfA ::pSW196- wspR* (c-di-GMP +) and IHMAΔ erfA ::pSW196- PA2133 (c-di-GMP −). Three clones were assayed in triplicates. The dots represent the data for each clone with the mean (bar). Global statistical difference was established with ANOVA ( p = 0.0036) and p -values for individual comparisons with IHMAΔ erfA (Dunnett’s test) are shown. ( H ). The three IHMA derivatives described in ( C , D ) (WT, c-di-GMP + and c-di-GMP −) were analyzed in strains harboring lacZ integrated within exlA gene to measure the transcriptional activity of the exlBA promoter. The β-galactosidase activity was measured in triplicates when bacterial cultures reached OD 600 = 1 and expressed in Miller’s units (MU). Results are shown as mean +/− SD. No significant differences were established with ANOVA. ( I ). ExlA contents in bacterial extracts (concentrated 10X) from strains IHMA exlB mut::pSW196 (Δ exlB ), IHMA exlB mut::pSW196- wspR* (Δ exlB c-di-GMP +), IHMA exlBmut ::pSW196- PA2133 (Δ exlB c-di-GMP −) were determined by Western blot. EFTu was used as loading control.
    Eftu, supplied by Hycult Biotech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/eftu/product/Hycult Biotech
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    eftu - by Bioz Stars, 2025-05
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    Hycult Biotech anti ef tu
    Cyclic-di-GMP regulates ExlA secretion( A ). Intracellular c-di-GMP levels in IHMA::pSW196 (IHMA) and PAO1::pSW196 (PAO1). Both strains contained the chromosomal PcdrA-gfp (ASV) c fusion as fluorescent reporter of c-di-GMP levels. GFP fluorescence was recorded for 16 h and was normalized by OD 585 to assess bacterial growth. The results, in arbitrary units (A; U), represent the mean +/− SD of six replicates. ( B ). The areas under the curves (AUC) were deduced from data shown in ( A ). Bar: mean. The indicated p -value was calculated with the Student’s test. ( C , D ). Similar experiment using IHMA::pSW196 (IHMA), IHMA::pSW196- wspR* (c-di-GMP +) and IHMA::pSW196- PA2133 (c-di-GMP −). Gene expression was induced by arabinose 0.025%. Statistical differences between AUC were calculated with ANOVA ( p < 0.0001) followed by Dunnett’s test for comparison with IHMA. ( E ). ExlA contents of secretomes and bacteria for IHMA::pSW196 (WT), IHMA Δ exlBA , IHMA::pSW196- wspR* (c-di-GMP +) and IHMA::pSW196- PA2133 (c-di-GMP −). Secretomes were concentrated 100X and bacterial extracts 10X before Western blot analysis and incubation with <t>ExlA</t> <t>antibodies</t> (Cter and ΔCter). FliC and <t>EFTu</t> were used as loading controls for secretomes and bacterial extracts, respectively. ( F ). ExlA/control signal ratios in secretomes and bacterial extracts are shown for three independent Western blot experiments (color coded). ( G ). ExlA was quantified by ELISA in the secretomes of IHMAΔ erfA ::pSW196 (Δ erfA ), IHMAΔ erfA ::pSW196- wspR* (c-di-GMP +) and IHMAΔ erfA ::pSW196- PA2133 (c-di-GMP −). Three clones were assayed in triplicates. The dots represent the data for each clone with the mean (bar). Global statistical difference was established with ANOVA ( p = 0.0036) and p -values for individual comparisons with IHMAΔ erfA (Dunnett’s test) are shown. ( H ). The three IHMA derivatives described in ( C , D ) (WT, c-di-GMP + and c-di-GMP −) were analyzed in strains harboring lacZ integrated within exlA gene to measure the transcriptional activity of the exlBA promoter. The β-galactosidase activity was measured in triplicates when bacterial cultures reached OD 600 = 1 and expressed in Miller’s units (MU). Results are shown as mean +/− SD. No significant differences were established with ANOVA. ( I ). ExlA contents in bacterial extracts (concentrated 10X) from strains IHMA exlB mut::pSW196 (Δ exlB ), IHMA exlB mut::pSW196- wspR* (Δ exlB c-di-GMP +), IHMA exlBmut ::pSW196- PA2133 (Δ exlB c-di-GMP −) were determined by Western blot. EFTu was used as loading control.
    Anti Ef Tu, supplied by Hycult Biotech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/anti ef tu/product/Hycult Biotech
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti ef tu - by Bioz Stars, 2025-05
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Cyclic-di-GMP regulates ExlA secretion( A ). Intracellular c-di-GMP levels in IHMA::pSW196 (IHMA) and PAO1::pSW196 (PAO1). Both strains contained the chromosomal PcdrA-gfp (ASV) c fusion as fluorescent reporter of c-di-GMP levels. GFP fluorescence was recorded for 16 h and was normalized by OD 585 to assess bacterial growth. The results, in arbitrary units (A; U), represent the mean +/− SD of six replicates. ( B ). The areas under the curves (AUC) were deduced from data shown in ( A ). Bar: mean. The indicated p -value was calculated with the Student’s test. ( C , D ). Similar experiment using IHMA::pSW196 (IHMA), IHMA::pSW196- wspR* (c-di-GMP +) and IHMA::pSW196- PA2133 (c-di-GMP −). Gene expression was induced by arabinose 0.025%. Statistical differences between AUC were calculated with ANOVA ( p < 0.0001) followed by Dunnett’s test for comparison with IHMA. ( E ). ExlA contents of secretomes and bacteria for IHMA::pSW196 (WT), IHMA Δ exlBA , IHMA::pSW196- wspR* (c-di-GMP +) and IHMA::pSW196- PA2133 (c-di-GMP −). Secretomes were concentrated 100X and bacterial extracts 10X before Western blot analysis and incubation with ExlA antibodies (Cter and ΔCter). FliC and EFTu were used as loading controls for secretomes and bacterial extracts, respectively. ( F ). ExlA/control signal ratios in secretomes and bacterial extracts are shown for three independent Western blot experiments (color coded). ( G ). ExlA was quantified by ELISA in the secretomes of IHMAΔ erfA ::pSW196 (Δ erfA ), IHMAΔ erfA ::pSW196- wspR* (c-di-GMP +) and IHMAΔ erfA ::pSW196- PA2133 (c-di-GMP −). Three clones were assayed in triplicates. The dots represent the data for each clone with the mean (bar). Global statistical difference was established with ANOVA ( p = 0.0036) and p -values for individual comparisons with IHMAΔ erfA (Dunnett’s test) are shown. ( H ). The three IHMA derivatives described in ( C , D ) (WT, c-di-GMP + and c-di-GMP −) were analyzed in strains harboring lacZ integrated within exlA gene to measure the transcriptional activity of the exlBA promoter. The β-galactosidase activity was measured in triplicates when bacterial cultures reached OD 600 = 1 and expressed in Miller’s units (MU). Results are shown as mean +/− SD. No significant differences were established with ANOVA. ( I ). ExlA contents in bacterial extracts (concentrated 10X) from strains IHMA exlB mut::pSW196 (Δ exlB ), IHMA exlB mut::pSW196- wspR* (Δ exlB c-di-GMP +), IHMA exlBmut ::pSW196- PA2133 (Δ exlB c-di-GMP −) were determined by Western blot. EFTu was used as loading control.

    Journal: Toxins

    Article Title: ExlA Pore-Forming Toxin: Localization at the Bacterial Membrane, Regulation of Secretion by Cyclic-Di-GMP, and Detection In Vivo

    doi: 10.3390/toxins13090645

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Cyclic-di-GMP regulates ExlA secretion( A ). Intracellular c-di-GMP levels in IHMA::pSW196 (IHMA) and PAO1::pSW196 (PAO1). Both strains contained the chromosomal PcdrA-gfp (ASV) c fusion as fluorescent reporter of c-di-GMP levels. GFP fluorescence was recorded for 16 h and was normalized by OD 585 to assess bacterial growth. The results, in arbitrary units (A; U), represent the mean +/− SD of six replicates. ( B ). The areas under the curves (AUC) were deduced from data shown in ( A ). Bar: mean. The indicated p -value was calculated with the Student’s test. ( C , D ). Similar experiment using IHMA::pSW196 (IHMA), IHMA::pSW196- wspR* (c-di-GMP +) and IHMA::pSW196- PA2133 (c-di-GMP −). Gene expression was induced by arabinose 0.025%. Statistical differences between AUC were calculated with ANOVA ( p < 0.0001) followed by Dunnett’s test for comparison with IHMA. ( E ). ExlA contents of secretomes and bacteria for IHMA::pSW196 (WT), IHMA Δ exlBA , IHMA::pSW196- wspR* (c-di-GMP +) and IHMA::pSW196- PA2133 (c-di-GMP −). Secretomes were concentrated 100X and bacterial extracts 10X before Western blot analysis and incubation with ExlA antibodies (Cter and ΔCter). FliC and EFTu were used as loading controls for secretomes and bacterial extracts, respectively. ( F ). ExlA/control signal ratios in secretomes and bacterial extracts are shown for three independent Western blot experiments (color coded). ( G ). ExlA was quantified by ELISA in the secretomes of IHMAΔ erfA ::pSW196 (Δ erfA ), IHMAΔ erfA ::pSW196- wspR* (c-di-GMP +) and IHMAΔ erfA ::pSW196- PA2133 (c-di-GMP −). Three clones were assayed in triplicates. The dots represent the data for each clone with the mean (bar). Global statistical difference was established with ANOVA ( p = 0.0036) and p -values for individual comparisons with IHMAΔ erfA (Dunnett’s test) are shown. ( H ). The three IHMA derivatives described in ( C , D ) (WT, c-di-GMP + and c-di-GMP −) were analyzed in strains harboring lacZ integrated within exlA gene to measure the transcriptional activity of the exlBA promoter. The β-galactosidase activity was measured in triplicates when bacterial cultures reached OD 600 = 1 and expressed in Miller’s units (MU). Results are shown as mean +/− SD. No significant differences were established with ANOVA. ( I ). ExlA contents in bacterial extracts (concentrated 10X) from strains IHMA exlB mut::pSW196 (Δ exlB ), IHMA exlB mut::pSW196- wspR* (Δ exlB c-di-GMP +), IHMA exlBmut ::pSW196- PA2133 (Δ exlB c-di-GMP −) were determined by Western blot. EFTu was used as loading control.

    Article Snippet: Membranes were incubated with the following antibodies: Cter and ΔCter ExlA antibodies, FliC [ ], EFTu (Hycult Biotech, HM6010), DsbA and Opr86 [ ].

    Techniques: Fluorescence, Expressing, Western Blot, Incubation, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Clone Assay, Activity Assay