e faecium nr (ATCC)
Structured Review
E Faecium Nr, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1907 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/e faecium nr/product/ATCC
Average 97 stars, based on 1907 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Repurposing antibacterial drugs identifies ridinilazole and CRS3123 as promising candidates against vancomycin-resistant enterococci"
Article Title: Repurposing antibacterial drugs identifies ridinilazole and CRS3123 as promising candidates against vancomycin-resistant enterococci
Journal: Scientific Reports
doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-29583-1
Figure Legend Snippet: Description and MICs (μM) of potent antibacterial library hits against E. faecium NR-31909.
Techniques Used: Activity Assay, Virus
Figure Legend Snippet: Time kill assay of ridinilazole, CRS3123 and linezolid at 5× and 10× MIC, against E. faecium NR-31,909. Samples treated with DMSO were used as negative control. The results are given as means ± SD ( n = 3; data without error bars indicate that the SD is too small to be seen).
Techniques Used: Time-Kill Assay, Negative Control
Figure Legend Snippet: Multistep resistance selection of ridinilazole, CRS3123, and rifampicin against Enterococcus species. (A) E. faecalis ATCC 29,212 and (B) E. faecium NR-31,909 were serially passaged over a 10-day period in the presence of ridinilazole, CRS3123, or rifampicin. The MICs of each compound were determined daily using the broth microdilution method.
Techniques Used: Selection
Figure Legend Snippet: In vivo efficacy of ridinilazole and CRS3123 against Enterococcus infection in the C. elegans model. C. elegans were infected with E. faecium NR-31,909 or E. faecalis ATCC 29,212. After infection, 30 worms were treated with ridinilazole, CRS3123, or linezolid. After 24 h, worms were lysed, and bacteria were plated to determine CFU counts. In E. faecium -infected worms, CRS3123 and linezolid reduced bacterial burden by approximately 3.8 and 3.5 log units, respectively, while ridinilazole produced a 2.5 log reduction. In E. faecalis -infected worms, CRS3123 and linezolid resulted in 1.8 and 1.5 log reductions, whereas ridinilazole showed no significant effect. Results are expressed as means from three biological replicates ± standard deviation. Statistical analyses were determined by one-way ANOVA with post hoc testing (* p < 0.01, ** p < 0.005, *** p < 0.0001).
Techniques Used: In Vivo, Infection, Bacteria, Produced, Standard Deviation