Structured Review

Proteintech idh1
Idh1, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/idh1/product/Proteintech
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
idh1 - by Bioz Stars, 2024-10
94/100 stars

Images


Structured Review

Proteintech anti idh1 mab
The immunocytochemistry of <t>IDH1</t> in MG63 and U2OS . IDH1 is specifically detected in the cytoplasm of both osteosarcoma cell lines MG63 and U2OS.(A) Expression of IDH1 in U2OS, × 200; (B) Expression of IDH1 in MG63,× 200; (C) Expression of IDH1 in U2OS,× 400; (D) Expression of IDH1 in MG63,× 400.
Anti Idh1 Mab, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/anti idh1 mab/product/Proteintech
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
anti idh1 mab - by Bioz Stars, 2024-10
93/100 stars

Images

1) Product Images from "The expression and significance of IDH1 and p53 in osteosarcoma"

Article Title: The expression and significance of IDH1 and p53 in osteosarcoma

Journal: Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research : CR

doi: 10.1186/1756-9966-29-43

The immunocytochemistry of IDH1 in MG63 and U2OS . IDH1 is specifically detected in the cytoplasm of both osteosarcoma cell lines MG63 and U2OS.(A) Expression of IDH1 in U2OS, × 200; (B) Expression of IDH1 in MG63,× 200; (C) Expression of IDH1 in U2OS,× 400; (D) Expression of IDH1 in MG63,× 400.
Figure Legend Snippet: The immunocytochemistry of IDH1 in MG63 and U2OS . IDH1 is specifically detected in the cytoplasm of both osteosarcoma cell lines MG63 and U2OS.(A) Expression of IDH1 in U2OS, × 200; (B) Expression of IDH1 in MG63,× 200; (C) Expression of IDH1 in U2OS,× 400; (D) Expression of IDH1 in MG63,× 400.

Techniques Used: Immunocytochemistry, Expressing

The mRNA levels of IDH1 in MG63 and U2OS (on fold) . The mRNA levels of IDH1 is higher in U2OS than in MG63( P < 0.01).
Figure Legend Snippet: The mRNA levels of IDH1 in MG63 and U2OS (on fold) . The mRNA levels of IDH1 is higher in U2OS than in MG63( P < 0.01).

Techniques Used:

The protein expression levels of IDH1 and p53 in U2OS and MG63 . MG63 demonstrates no detectable p53 while U2OS cells demonstrates a high expressed p53. IDH1 expresses higher in U2OS than in MG63 at the protein level( P < 0.01).
Figure Legend Snippet: The protein expression levels of IDH1 and p53 in U2OS and MG63 . MG63 demonstrates no detectable p53 while U2OS cells demonstrates a high expressed p53. IDH1 expresses higher in U2OS than in MG63 at the protein level( P < 0.01).

Techniques Used: Expressing

The expression of IDH1 and p53 in low histological Rosen grade biopsy . IDH1 expresses at high level accompanying with high expressed p53 in Low histological Rosen grade biopsy.(A) Expression of IDH1 in low histological Rosen grade biopsy, × 100;(B) Expression of p53 in low histological Rosen grade biopsy, × 100; (C) Expression of IDH1 in low histological Rosen grade biopsy, × 200;(D) Expression of p53 in low histological Rosen grade biopsy, × 200.
Figure Legend Snippet: The expression of IDH1 and p53 in low histological Rosen grade biopsy . IDH1 expresses at high level accompanying with high expressed p53 in Low histological Rosen grade biopsy.(A) Expression of IDH1 in low histological Rosen grade biopsy, × 100;(B) Expression of p53 in low histological Rosen grade biopsy, × 100; (C) Expression of IDH1 in low histological Rosen grade biopsy, × 200;(D) Expression of p53 in low histological Rosen grade biopsy, × 200.

Techniques Used: Expressing

The expression of IDH1 and p53 in high histological Rosen grade biopsy . IDH1 expresses at low level accompanying with low expressed p53 in high histological Rosen grade biopsy.(A) Expression of IDH1 in high histological Rosen grade biopsy, × 100;(B) Expression of p53 in high histological Rosen grade biopsy, × 100; (C) Expression of IDH1 in high histological Rosen grade biopsy, × 200;(D) Expression of p53 in high histological Rosen grade biopsy, × 200.
Figure Legend Snippet: The expression of IDH1 and p53 in high histological Rosen grade biopsy . IDH1 expresses at low level accompanying with low expressed p53 in high histological Rosen grade biopsy.(A) Expression of IDH1 in high histological Rosen grade biopsy, × 100;(B) Expression of p53 in high histological Rosen grade biopsy, × 100; (C) Expression of IDH1 in high histological Rosen grade biopsy, × 200;(D) Expression of p53 in high histological Rosen grade biopsy, × 200.

Techniques Used: Expressing

The expression of  IDH1  and P53 in osteosarcoma biopsies
Figure Legend Snippet: The expression of IDH1 and P53 in osteosarcoma biopsies

Techniques Used: Expressing

The immunostaining percentages of IDH1 and p53 in low Rosen grade vs. high Rosen grade . IDH1 expresses higher in Low histological Rosen grade compare with high histological Rosen grade at the level of the immunostaining percentages ( P < 0.01), so does p53 ( P < 0.01).
Figure Legend Snippet: The immunostaining percentages of IDH1 and p53 in low Rosen grade vs. high Rosen grade . IDH1 expresses higher in Low histological Rosen grade compare with high histological Rosen grade at the level of the immunostaining percentages ( P < 0.01), so does p53 ( P < 0.01).

Techniques Used: Immunostaining

The immunostaining scores of IDH1 and p53 in low Rosen grade vs. high Rosen grade . IDH1 expresses higher in Low histological Rosen grade compare with high histological Rosen grade at the level of the immunostaining scores ( P < 0.05), so does p53 ( P < 0.01).
Figure Legend Snippet: The immunostaining scores of IDH1 and p53 in low Rosen grade vs. high Rosen grade . IDH1 expresses higher in Low histological Rosen grade compare with high histological Rosen grade at the level of the immunostaining scores ( P < 0.05), so does p53 ( P < 0.01).

Techniques Used: Immunostaining

The relationship between IDH1 and survival . The IDH1 high expression group represents the osteosarcoma patients with >50% IDH1 positive staining. Patients with ≤ 50% IDH1 positive staining are recorded as low-expression group. The survival time in the χ -axis was given as years. There is no significant correlation between IDH1 expression and overall survival ( P = 0.342).
Figure Legend Snippet: The relationship between IDH1 and survival . The IDH1 high expression group represents the osteosarcoma patients with >50% IDH1 positive staining. Patients with ≤ 50% IDH1 positive staining are recorded as low-expression group. The survival time in the χ -axis was given as years. There is no significant correlation between IDH1 expression and overall survival ( P = 0.342).

Techniques Used: Expressing, Staining


Structured Review

Proteintech idh1
List of primers for qRT-PCR
Idh1, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/idh1/product/Proteintech
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
idh1 - by Bioz Stars, 2024-10
94/100 stars

Images

1) Product Images from "Wild-type IDH1 inhibits the tumor growth through degrading HIF-α in renal cell carcinoma"

Article Title: Wild-type IDH1 inhibits the tumor growth through degrading HIF-α in renal cell carcinoma

Journal: International Journal of Biological Sciences

doi: 10.7150/ijbs.54401

List of primers for qRT-PCR
Figure Legend Snippet: List of primers for qRT-PCR

Techniques Used:

List of primary antibodies
Figure Legend Snippet: List of primary antibodies

Techniques Used:

Expression level distribution of IDH1 in RCC and cell lines. (A) Heatmap of the 500 genes most relevant to IDH1 in TCGA-KIRC database, and the sequence of column samples is arranged according to IDH1 expression levels from low to high, red squares represent high expressions and blue squares represent low expressions. (B-C) Distribution of IDH1 transcriptional expression level and its substrate α-KG in (i) RCC tissues and (ii) cell lines. (D) Distribution of IDH1 protein levels in (i) RCC tissues and (ii) cell lines. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; N.S. no significant.
Figure Legend Snippet: Expression level distribution of IDH1 in RCC and cell lines. (A) Heatmap of the 500 genes most relevant to IDH1 in TCGA-KIRC database, and the sequence of column samples is arranged according to IDH1 expression levels from low to high, red squares represent high expressions and blue squares represent low expressions. (B-C) Distribution of IDH1 transcriptional expression level and its substrate α-KG in (i) RCC tissues and (ii) cell lines. (D) Distribution of IDH1 protein levels in (i) RCC tissues and (ii) cell lines. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; N.S. no significant.

Techniques Used: Expressing, Sequencing

Wild-type IDH1 inhibits proliferation and metastasis of RCC and promotes apoptosis. (A) Transcriptional expression of wild-type IDH1 and mutant IDH1 was verified by qRT-PCR. (B) The translation level expression of wild-type IDH1 and mutant IDH1 was verified by WB assay. (C) MTT assay was used to determine the effect of wild-type IDH1 and mutant IDH1 on the proliferation ability of (i) ACHN and (ii) 786-O cell lines. (D) (i)The effect of wild-type IDH1 and mutant IDH1 on the proliferation ability of ACHN and 786-O cell lines was determined by clone formation assay. (ii-iii) The statistical histogram of the clone formation assay. (E) (i) Migration assay were conducted to measure the impact of wild-type and mutant IDH1 on migration capacity. (ii) The statistical histogram of the migration assay. (F) (i) The effect of wild-type and mutant IDH1 on cell apoptosis was measured by flow cytometry assay. (ii-iii) The statistical histogram of the cell apoptosis assay. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; N.S. no significant.
Figure Legend Snippet: Wild-type IDH1 inhibits proliferation and metastasis of RCC and promotes apoptosis. (A) Transcriptional expression of wild-type IDH1 and mutant IDH1 was verified by qRT-PCR. (B) The translation level expression of wild-type IDH1 and mutant IDH1 was verified by WB assay. (C) MTT assay was used to determine the effect of wild-type IDH1 and mutant IDH1 on the proliferation ability of (i) ACHN and (ii) 786-O cell lines. (D) (i)The effect of wild-type IDH1 and mutant IDH1 on the proliferation ability of ACHN and 786-O cell lines was determined by clone formation assay. (ii-iii) The statistical histogram of the clone formation assay. (E) (i) Migration assay were conducted to measure the impact of wild-type and mutant IDH1 on migration capacity. (ii) The statistical histogram of the migration assay. (F) (i) The effect of wild-type and mutant IDH1 on cell apoptosis was measured by flow cytometry assay. (ii-iii) The statistical histogram of the cell apoptosis assay. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; N.S. no significant.

Techniques Used: Expressing, Mutagenesis, Quantitative RT-PCR, MTT Assay, Tube Formation Assay, Migration, Flow Cytometry, Apoptosis Assay

Effect of IDH1 substrate α-KG on the biological function of RCC cell lines. (A) The inhibition effect of α-KG on the proliferation of RCC lines was verified by MTT assay. (B) clonogenic forming assay showed that α-KG could significantly inhibit the proliferation of RCC cell lines (C) The migration assay verified the significant inhibition of α-KG on the migration ability of RCC cells. (D) α-KG significantly increased apoptosis in RCC cell lines. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; N.S. no significant.
Figure Legend Snippet: Effect of IDH1 substrate α-KG on the biological function of RCC cell lines. (A) The inhibition effect of α-KG on the proliferation of RCC lines was verified by MTT assay. (B) clonogenic forming assay showed that α-KG could significantly inhibit the proliferation of RCC cell lines (C) The migration assay verified the significant inhibition of α-KG on the migration ability of RCC cells. (D) α-KG significantly increased apoptosis in RCC cell lines. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; N.S. no significant.

Techniques Used: Inhibition, MTT Assay, Migration

IDH1 inhibits the development of RCC by repressing hypoxia-inducible factor 1. (A) The effects of wild-type and mutant IDH1 plasmids on α-KG concentration were verified with a dedicated kit. (B) Western blot analysis of IDH1 affects representative proteins involved in the regulation of hypoxia signaling pathways: HIF-1α, HIF-2α, TGF-α and VEGF. (C) The knockdown efficiency of si-IDH1 was verified by qRT-PCR. (D) Compare the western blot results of hypoxia-related protein changes after IDH1 was knocked out. (E) qRT-PCR was used to detect the transcriptional changes of hypoxia-related proteins in α-KG after treatment. (F) WB was used to detect the translation level changes of hypoxia-related proteins in α-KG after treatment. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; N.S. no significant.
Figure Legend Snippet: IDH1 inhibits the development of RCC by repressing hypoxia-inducible factor 1. (A) The effects of wild-type and mutant IDH1 plasmids on α-KG concentration were verified with a dedicated kit. (B) Western blot analysis of IDH1 affects representative proteins involved in the regulation of hypoxia signaling pathways: HIF-1α, HIF-2α, TGF-α and VEGF. (C) The knockdown efficiency of si-IDH1 was verified by qRT-PCR. (D) Compare the western blot results of hypoxia-related protein changes after IDH1 was knocked out. (E) qRT-PCR was used to detect the transcriptional changes of hypoxia-related proteins in α-KG after treatment. (F) WB was used to detect the translation level changes of hypoxia-related proteins in α-KG after treatment. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; N.S. no significant.

Techniques Used: Mutagenesis, Concentration Assay, Western Blot, Quantitative RT-PCR

Overexpression IDH1 suppressed RCC cell growth in vivo . (A) Transcriptional and translational levels of overexpressed IDH1 lentivirus efficiency validation. (B-C) The continuous measurement of tumor growth activity and weighing mice body weight as well as dissected-tumor. (D) H&E Staining of tumor tissues in tumor-bearing mouse. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; N.S. no significant.
Figure Legend Snippet: Overexpression IDH1 suppressed RCC cell growth in vivo . (A) Transcriptional and translational levels of overexpressed IDH1 lentivirus efficiency validation. (B-C) The continuous measurement of tumor growth activity and weighing mice body weight as well as dissected-tumor. (D) H&E Staining of tumor tissues in tumor-bearing mouse. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; N.S. no significant.

Techniques Used: Over Expression, In Vivo, Activity Assay, Staining

IHC staining in tumor-bearing mouse. (A) ki-67. (B) IDH1. (C) HIF-1α. (D) HIF-2α. (E) VEGF. (F) TGF-α.
Figure Legend Snippet: IHC staining in tumor-bearing mouse. (A) ki-67. (B) IDH1. (C) HIF-1α. (D) HIF-2α. (E) VEGF. (F) TGF-α.

Techniques Used: Immunohistochemistry


Structured Review

Proteintech 1 ap
1 Ap, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/1 ap/product/Proteintech
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
1 ap - by Bioz Stars, 2024-10
94/100 stars

Images


Structured Review

Proteintech anti idh1
Anti Idh1, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/anti idh1/product/Proteintech
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
anti idh1 - by Bioz Stars, 2024-10
94/100 stars

Images


Structured Review

Proteintech anti idh1
Expression of <t>IDH1</t> in ox-LDL-induced foam cells. ( A ) Viability of RAW264.7 cells treated with ox-LDL (25, 50, 75, 100 µg/mL) for 24 h. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 vs. control group. ( B , C ) Western blot was used to detect the levels of IDH1 protein expression. ## p < 0.01 si-IDH1 treatment group vs. control group; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 ox-LDL-treated group vs. control group. ( D , E ) Western blot was used to detect the levels of IDH1 protein expression. ## p < 0.01 vs. control group; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 vs. ox-LDL-treated group; & p < 0.05, && p < 0.01 vs. ox-LDL and si-IDH1 treatment group. NS vs. ox-LDL and si-IDH1 treatment group. ( F – I ) NRF2, GPX4, and SLC7A11 expression. ## p < 0.01 vs. control group; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 vs. ox-LDL-treated group; NS vs. ox-LDL and si-IDH1 treatment group. & p < 0.05, && p < 0.01 vs. ox-LDL and Fer-1 treatment group. NS, not significant. Data are presented as mean ± SD.
Anti Idh1, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/anti idh1/product/Proteintech
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
anti idh1 - by Bioz Stars, 2024-10
94/100 stars

Images

1) Product Images from "IDH1 Promotes Foam Cell Formation by Aggravating Macrophage Ferroptosis"

Article Title: IDH1 Promotes Foam Cell Formation by Aggravating Macrophage Ferroptosis

Journal: Biology

doi: 10.3390/biology11101392

Expression of IDH1 in ox-LDL-induced foam cells. ( A ) Viability of RAW264.7 cells treated with ox-LDL (25, 50, 75, 100 µg/mL) for 24 h. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 vs. control group. ( B , C ) Western blot was used to detect the levels of IDH1 protein expression. ## p < 0.01 si-IDH1 treatment group vs. control group; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 ox-LDL-treated group vs. control group. ( D , E ) Western blot was used to detect the levels of IDH1 protein expression. ## p < 0.01 vs. control group; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 vs. ox-LDL-treated group; & p < 0.05, && p < 0.01 vs. ox-LDL and si-IDH1 treatment group. NS vs. ox-LDL and si-IDH1 treatment group. ( F – I ) NRF2, GPX4, and SLC7A11 expression. ## p < 0.01 vs. control group; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 vs. ox-LDL-treated group; NS vs. ox-LDL and si-IDH1 treatment group. & p < 0.05, && p < 0.01 vs. ox-LDL and Fer-1 treatment group. NS, not significant. Data are presented as mean ± SD.
Figure Legend Snippet: Expression of IDH1 in ox-LDL-induced foam cells. ( A ) Viability of RAW264.7 cells treated with ox-LDL (25, 50, 75, 100 µg/mL) for 24 h. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 vs. control group. ( B , C ) Western blot was used to detect the levels of IDH1 protein expression. ## p < 0.01 si-IDH1 treatment group vs. control group; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 ox-LDL-treated group vs. control group. ( D , E ) Western blot was used to detect the levels of IDH1 protein expression. ## p < 0.01 vs. control group; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 vs. ox-LDL-treated group; & p < 0.05, && p < 0.01 vs. ox-LDL and si-IDH1 treatment group. NS vs. ox-LDL and si-IDH1 treatment group. ( F – I ) NRF2, GPX4, and SLC7A11 expression. ## p < 0.01 vs. control group; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 vs. ox-LDL-treated group; NS vs. ox-LDL and si-IDH1 treatment group. & p < 0.05, && p < 0.01 vs. ox-LDL and Fer-1 treatment group. NS, not significant. Data are presented as mean ± SD.

Techniques Used: Expressing, Western Blot

Inhibition of IDH1 ameliorates ox-LDL-induced ferroptosis. ( A ) The levels of GSH. ( B ) The level of iron content. ( C ) The total content of LPO. ( D ) Cell survival determined by CCK-8. ( E ) The brightfield images showing dead cells (Scale bars = 50 µm). ## p < 0.01 vs. control group; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 vs. ox-LDL-treated group; NS vs. ox-LDL and si-IDH1 treatment group. & p < 0.05, && p < 0.01 vs. ox-LDL and Fer-1 treatment group. NS, not significant. Data are presented as mean ± SD.
Figure Legend Snippet: Inhibition of IDH1 ameliorates ox-LDL-induced ferroptosis. ( A ) The levels of GSH. ( B ) The level of iron content. ( C ) The total content of LPO. ( D ) Cell survival determined by CCK-8. ( E ) The brightfield images showing dead cells (Scale bars = 50 µm). ## p < 0.01 vs. control group; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 vs. ox-LDL-treated group; NS vs. ox-LDL and si-IDH1 treatment group. & p < 0.05, && p < 0.01 vs. ox-LDL and Fer-1 treatment group. NS, not significant. Data are presented as mean ± SD.

Techniques Used: Inhibition, CCK-8 Assay

Inhibition of IDH1 ameliorates ox-LDL-induced macrophage apoptosis. ( A , B ) Apoptosis of RAW264.7 cells in different groups was examined via flow cytometry. ( C ) JASPAR-predicted NRF2 transcription factor binding sites. ( D ) Nrf2 and IDH1 potential binding sites. ( E ) Relative enrichment of IDH1, detected by ChIP. ## p < 0.01 vs. control group; ** p < 0.01 vs. ox-LDL-treated group; NS vs. ox-LDL and si-IDH1 treatment group. && p < 0.01 vs. ox-LDL and Fer-1 treatment group. NS, not significant. Data are presented as mean ± SD.
Figure Legend Snippet: Inhibition of IDH1 ameliorates ox-LDL-induced macrophage apoptosis. ( A , B ) Apoptosis of RAW264.7 cells in different groups was examined via flow cytometry. ( C ) JASPAR-predicted NRF2 transcription factor binding sites. ( D ) Nrf2 and IDH1 potential binding sites. ( E ) Relative enrichment of IDH1, detected by ChIP. ## p < 0.01 vs. control group; ** p < 0.01 vs. ox-LDL-treated group; NS vs. ox-LDL and si-IDH1 treatment group. && p < 0.01 vs. ox-LDL and Fer-1 treatment group. NS, not significant. Data are presented as mean ± SD.

Techniques Used: Inhibition, Flow Cytometry, Binding Assay


Structured Review

Proteintech 1 ap rrid ab 2123159
1 Ap Rrid Ab 2123159, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/1 ap rrid ab 2123159/product/Proteintech
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
1 ap rrid ab 2123159 - by Bioz Stars, 2024-10
94/100 stars

Images


Structured Review

Proteintech rabbit anti idh1
( A ) HEK293T cells transfected with wild-type (WT) or the indicated mutant of <t>IDH1</t> or IDH2, or empty vector, were analyzed for intracellular metabolites 72 hr after transfection by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS). Quantitation of 2HG single intensity relative to glutamate was determined using total ion chromatograms (TIC) for each biological repeat (n = 6). Box and whisker plot with median represented as the line through the box and whiskers representing values within 1.5 interquartile range (IQR) of the first and third quartiles. Means as black dot and bold error bars represent 95% CI. Data estimated from the representative experiment reported in Figure 1B of is displayed as a single point (red circle) for comparison. Statistical analysis was performed on log 10 -transformed data generated during this replication attempt. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) of IDH1 and IDH2 groups: F (3, 20) = 56.8, p = 5.73 × 10 −10 . Planned contrasts between IDH1 WT and IDH1 R132H: t (20) = 8.33, uncorrected p = 6.23 × 10 −8 , Bonferroni corrected p = 1.25 × 10 −7 , Cohen’s d = 4.81, 95% CI [2.42, 7.15]; IDH2 WT and IDH2 R172K: t (20) = 9.35, uncorrected p = 9.71 × 10 −9 , Bonferroni corrected p = 1.94 × 10 −8 , Cohen’s d = 5.40, 95% CI [2.79, 7.96]. ( B ) Western blot analysis for HEK293T cells transfected with WT or the indicated mutant of IDH1 or IDH2, or empty vector. Methylation status from histone extracts of the indicated markers were normalized to H3 and then to vector for each biological repeat (n = 6). Box and whisker plot with median represented as the line through the box and whiskers representing values within 1.5 IQR of the first and third quartiles. For each marker a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA; or Kruskal–Wallis) was performed on IDH1 and IDH2 groups and the correlation with 2HG levels in A was performed. H3K4me2: H(3) = 0.367, uncorrected p = 0.947, Bonferroni corrected p > 0.99; correlation with 2HG: t (12) = 1.12, uncorrected p = 0.275, Bonferroni corrected p > 0.99. H3K9me2: F (3,20) = 0.793, uncorrected p = 0.512, Bonferroni corrected p > 0.99; correlation with 2HG: t (12) = 1.53, uncorrected p = 0.140, Bonferroni corrected p = 0.699. H3K9me3: F (3,20) = 0.515, uncorrected p = 0.676, Bonferroni corrected p > 0.99; correlation with 2HG: t (12) = 1.35, uncorrected p = 0.191, Bonferroni corrected p = 0.957. H3K36me3: F (3,20) = 0.248, uncorrected p = 0.862, Bonferroni corrected p > 0.99; correlation with 2HG: t (12) = 0.725, uncorrected p = 0.476, Bonferroni corrected p > 0.99. H3K79me2: H(3) = 1.55, uncorrected p = 0.672, Bonferroni corrected p > 0.99; correlation with 2HG: t (12) = 0.752, uncorrected p = 0.460, Bonferroni corrected p > 0.99. Planned contrasts for H3K9me2 between IDH1 WT and IDH1 R132H: t (20) = −0.238, uncorrected p = 0.815, Bonferroni corrected p > 0.99; IDH2 WT and IDH2 R172K: t (20) = 1.31, uncorrected p = 0.203, Bonferroni corrected p > 0.99. ( C ) 3T3-L1 cells were transduced to express the indicated proteins and analyzed and presented in the same way as A . Number of independent biological repeats (n = 5). Data estimated from the representative experiment reported in Figure 2A of is displayed as a single point (red circle) for comparison. Statistical analysis was performed on log 10 -transformed data generated during this replication attempt. Student’s t -test of IDH2 WT and IDH2 R172K: t (8) = 14.3, p = 5.49 × 10 −7 , Cohen’s d = 9.06, 95% CI [4.53, 13.57]. Additional details can be found at https://osf.io/vfsbo/ .
Rabbit Anti Idh1, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/rabbit anti idh1/product/Proteintech
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
rabbit anti idh1 - by Bioz Stars, 2024-10
94/100 stars

Images

1) Product Images from "Experiments from unfinished Registered Reports in the Reproducibility Project: Cancer Biology"

Article Title: Experiments from unfinished Registered Reports in the Reproducibility Project: Cancer Biology

Journal: eLife

doi: 10.7554/eLife.73430

( A ) HEK293T cells transfected with wild-type (WT) or the indicated mutant of IDH1 or IDH2, or empty vector, were analyzed for intracellular metabolites 72 hr after transfection by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS). Quantitation of 2HG single intensity relative to glutamate was determined using total ion chromatograms (TIC) for each biological repeat (n = 6). Box and whisker plot with median represented as the line through the box and whiskers representing values within 1.5 interquartile range (IQR) of the first and third quartiles. Means as black dot and bold error bars represent 95% CI. Data estimated from the representative experiment reported in Figure 1B of is displayed as a single point (red circle) for comparison. Statistical analysis was performed on log 10 -transformed data generated during this replication attempt. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) of IDH1 and IDH2 groups: F (3, 20) = 56.8, p = 5.73 × 10 −10 . Planned contrasts between IDH1 WT and IDH1 R132H: t (20) = 8.33, uncorrected p = 6.23 × 10 −8 , Bonferroni corrected p = 1.25 × 10 −7 , Cohen’s d = 4.81, 95% CI [2.42, 7.15]; IDH2 WT and IDH2 R172K: t (20) = 9.35, uncorrected p = 9.71 × 10 −9 , Bonferroni corrected p = 1.94 × 10 −8 , Cohen’s d = 5.40, 95% CI [2.79, 7.96]. ( B ) Western blot analysis for HEK293T cells transfected with WT or the indicated mutant of IDH1 or IDH2, or empty vector. Methylation status from histone extracts of the indicated markers were normalized to H3 and then to vector for each biological repeat (n = 6). Box and whisker plot with median represented as the line through the box and whiskers representing values within 1.5 IQR of the first and third quartiles. For each marker a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA; or Kruskal–Wallis) was performed on IDH1 and IDH2 groups and the correlation with 2HG levels in A was performed. H3K4me2: H(3) = 0.367, uncorrected p = 0.947, Bonferroni corrected p > 0.99; correlation with 2HG: t (12) = 1.12, uncorrected p = 0.275, Bonferroni corrected p > 0.99. H3K9me2: F (3,20) = 0.793, uncorrected p = 0.512, Bonferroni corrected p > 0.99; correlation with 2HG: t (12) = 1.53, uncorrected p = 0.140, Bonferroni corrected p = 0.699. H3K9me3: F (3,20) = 0.515, uncorrected p = 0.676, Bonferroni corrected p > 0.99; correlation with 2HG: t (12) = 1.35, uncorrected p = 0.191, Bonferroni corrected p = 0.957. H3K36me3: F (3,20) = 0.248, uncorrected p = 0.862, Bonferroni corrected p > 0.99; correlation with 2HG: t (12) = 0.725, uncorrected p = 0.476, Bonferroni corrected p > 0.99. H3K79me2: H(3) = 1.55, uncorrected p = 0.672, Bonferroni corrected p > 0.99; correlation with 2HG: t (12) = 0.752, uncorrected p = 0.460, Bonferroni corrected p > 0.99. Planned contrasts for H3K9me2 between IDH1 WT and IDH1 R132H: t (20) = −0.238, uncorrected p = 0.815, Bonferroni corrected p > 0.99; IDH2 WT and IDH2 R172K: t (20) = 1.31, uncorrected p = 0.203, Bonferroni corrected p > 0.99. ( C ) 3T3-L1 cells were transduced to express the indicated proteins and analyzed and presented in the same way as A . Number of independent biological repeats (n = 5). Data estimated from the representative experiment reported in Figure 2A of is displayed as a single point (red circle) for comparison. Statistical analysis was performed on log 10 -transformed data generated during this replication attempt. Student’s t -test of IDH2 WT and IDH2 R172K: t (8) = 14.3, p = 5.49 × 10 −7 , Cohen’s d = 9.06, 95% CI [4.53, 13.57]. Additional details can be found at https://osf.io/vfsbo/ .
Figure Legend Snippet: ( A ) HEK293T cells transfected with wild-type (WT) or the indicated mutant of IDH1 or IDH2, or empty vector, were analyzed for intracellular metabolites 72 hr after transfection by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS). Quantitation of 2HG single intensity relative to glutamate was determined using total ion chromatograms (TIC) for each biological repeat (n = 6). Box and whisker plot with median represented as the line through the box and whiskers representing values within 1.5 interquartile range (IQR) of the first and third quartiles. Means as black dot and bold error bars represent 95% CI. Data estimated from the representative experiment reported in Figure 1B of is displayed as a single point (red circle) for comparison. Statistical analysis was performed on log 10 -transformed data generated during this replication attempt. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) of IDH1 and IDH2 groups: F (3, 20) = 56.8, p = 5.73 × 10 −10 . Planned contrasts between IDH1 WT and IDH1 R132H: t (20) = 8.33, uncorrected p = 6.23 × 10 −8 , Bonferroni corrected p = 1.25 × 10 −7 , Cohen’s d = 4.81, 95% CI [2.42, 7.15]; IDH2 WT and IDH2 R172K: t (20) = 9.35, uncorrected p = 9.71 × 10 −9 , Bonferroni corrected p = 1.94 × 10 −8 , Cohen’s d = 5.40, 95% CI [2.79, 7.96]. ( B ) Western blot analysis for HEK293T cells transfected with WT or the indicated mutant of IDH1 or IDH2, or empty vector. Methylation status from histone extracts of the indicated markers were normalized to H3 and then to vector for each biological repeat (n = 6). Box and whisker plot with median represented as the line through the box and whiskers representing values within 1.5 IQR of the first and third quartiles. For each marker a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA; or Kruskal–Wallis) was performed on IDH1 and IDH2 groups and the correlation with 2HG levels in A was performed. H3K4me2: H(3) = 0.367, uncorrected p = 0.947, Bonferroni corrected p > 0.99; correlation with 2HG: t (12) = 1.12, uncorrected p = 0.275, Bonferroni corrected p > 0.99. H3K9me2: F (3,20) = 0.793, uncorrected p = 0.512, Bonferroni corrected p > 0.99; correlation with 2HG: t (12) = 1.53, uncorrected p = 0.140, Bonferroni corrected p = 0.699. H3K9me3: F (3,20) = 0.515, uncorrected p = 0.676, Bonferroni corrected p > 0.99; correlation with 2HG: t (12) = 1.35, uncorrected p = 0.191, Bonferroni corrected p = 0.957. H3K36me3: F (3,20) = 0.248, uncorrected p = 0.862, Bonferroni corrected p > 0.99; correlation with 2HG: t (12) = 0.725, uncorrected p = 0.476, Bonferroni corrected p > 0.99. H3K79me2: H(3) = 1.55, uncorrected p = 0.672, Bonferroni corrected p > 0.99; correlation with 2HG: t (12) = 0.752, uncorrected p = 0.460, Bonferroni corrected p > 0.99. Planned contrasts for H3K9me2 between IDH1 WT and IDH1 R132H: t (20) = −0.238, uncorrected p = 0.815, Bonferroni corrected p > 0.99; IDH2 WT and IDH2 R172K: t (20) = 1.31, uncorrected p = 0.203, Bonferroni corrected p > 0.99. ( C ) 3T3-L1 cells were transduced to express the indicated proteins and analyzed and presented in the same way as A . Number of independent biological repeats (n = 5). Data estimated from the representative experiment reported in Figure 2A of is displayed as a single point (red circle) for comparison. Statistical analysis was performed on log 10 -transformed data generated during this replication attempt. Student’s t -test of IDH2 WT and IDH2 R172K: t (8) = 14.3, p = 5.49 × 10 −7 , Cohen’s d = 9.06, 95% CI [4.53, 13.57]. Additional details can be found at https://osf.io/vfsbo/ .

Techniques Used: Transfection, Mutagenesis, Plasmid Preparation, Gas Chromatography, Mass Spectrometry, Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry, Quantitation Assay, Whisker Assay, Transformation Assay, Generated, Western Blot, Methylation, Marker

( A ) This is the same experiment as in . Representative Western blots (experiment performed independently six times) of histone extractions from HEK293T cells transfected with the indicated plasmids. Membranes were probed with the indicated antibodies (total H3 served as loading control). ( B ) This is the same experiment as in . Representative total ion chromatograms (TIC) from samples harvested 72 hr after transfection for the indicated transfected HEK293T cells. The detection of 2HG and glutamate are shown and based on spectra of derivatized commercial standards. ( C ) This is the same experiment as in . Representative Western blots (experiment performed independently six times) of histone extractions from 3T3-L1 cells transduced to express the indicated proteins. Membranes were probed with IDH1 and IDH2. ( D ) This is the same experiment as in . Representative TIC from samples harvested 7 days after transduction to express the indicated proteins in 3T-L1 cells. The detection of 2HG and glutamate are shown and based on spectra of derivatized commercial standards. Additional details can be found at https://osf.io/vfsbo/ .
Figure Legend Snippet: ( A ) This is the same experiment as in . Representative Western blots (experiment performed independently six times) of histone extractions from HEK293T cells transfected with the indicated plasmids. Membranes were probed with the indicated antibodies (total H3 served as loading control). ( B ) This is the same experiment as in . Representative total ion chromatograms (TIC) from samples harvested 72 hr after transfection for the indicated transfected HEK293T cells. The detection of 2HG and glutamate are shown and based on spectra of derivatized commercial standards. ( C ) This is the same experiment as in . Representative Western blots (experiment performed independently six times) of histone extractions from 3T3-L1 cells transduced to express the indicated proteins. Membranes were probed with IDH1 and IDH2. ( D ) This is the same experiment as in . Representative TIC from samples harvested 7 days after transduction to express the indicated proteins in 3T-L1 cells. The detection of 2HG and glutamate are shown and based on spectra of derivatized commercial standards. Additional details can be found at https://osf.io/vfsbo/ .

Techniques Used: Western Blot, Transfection, Transduction

Meta-analysis of each effect reported in . Effect size and 95 % confidence intervals are presented for , this replication study (Reproducibility Project: Cancer Biology, RP:CB), and a random-effects meta-analysis of those two effects. The effect size r is a standardized measure of the correlation (strength and direction) of the association between two variables and Cohen’s d is a standardized difference between the two indicated measurements where a larger value indicates a difference in expression between the two conditions. ( A ) Meta-analysis p values: H3K4me3 expression ( p = 0.235), H3K9me2 expression ( p = 0.117), H3K9me3 expression ( p = 0.135), H3K36me3 expression ( p = 0.133), and H3K79me2 expression ( p = 0.090). ( B ) Meta-analysis p values: H3K9me2 expression between IDH1 WT and IDH1 R132H ( p = 0.398), and H3K9me2 expression between IDH2 WT and IDH2 R172K ( p = 0.202). ( C ) Meta-analysis p values: correlation of H3K4me3 expression and 2HG ( p = 0.122), correlation of H3K9me2 expression and 2HG ( p = 0.092), correlation of H3K9me3 expression and 2HG ( p = 0.081), correlation of H3K36me3 expression and 2HG ( p = 0.181), and correlation of H3K79me2 expression and 2HG ( p = 0.185). Sample sizes used in and RP:CB are reported under the study name. Additional details can be found at https://osf.io/vfsbo/ .
Figure Legend Snippet: Meta-analysis of each effect reported in . Effect size and 95 % confidence intervals are presented for , this replication study (Reproducibility Project: Cancer Biology, RP:CB), and a random-effects meta-analysis of those two effects. The effect size r is a standardized measure of the correlation (strength and direction) of the association between two variables and Cohen’s d is a standardized difference between the two indicated measurements where a larger value indicates a difference in expression between the two conditions. ( A ) Meta-analysis p values: H3K4me3 expression ( p = 0.235), H3K9me2 expression ( p = 0.117), H3K9me3 expression ( p = 0.135), H3K36me3 expression ( p = 0.133), and H3K79me2 expression ( p = 0.090). ( B ) Meta-analysis p values: H3K9me2 expression between IDH1 WT and IDH1 R132H ( p = 0.398), and H3K9me2 expression between IDH2 WT and IDH2 R172K ( p = 0.202). ( C ) Meta-analysis p values: correlation of H3K4me3 expression and 2HG ( p = 0.122), correlation of H3K9me2 expression and 2HG ( p = 0.092), correlation of H3K9me3 expression and 2HG ( p = 0.081), correlation of H3K36me3 expression and 2HG ( p = 0.181), and correlation of H3K79me2 expression and 2HG ( p = 0.185). Sample sizes used in and RP:CB are reported under the study name. Additional details can be found at https://osf.io/vfsbo/ .

Techniques Used: Expressing


Figure Legend Snippet:

Techniques Used: Software, Infection, Recombinant, Plasmid Preparation


Structured Review

Proteintech rabbit anti idh1
( A ) HEK293T cells transfected with wild-type (WT) or the indicated mutant of <t>IDH1</t> or IDH2, or empty vector, were analyzed for intracellular metabolites 72 hr after transfection by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS). Quantitation of 2HG single intensity relative to glutamate was determined using total ion chromatograms (TIC) for each biological repeat (n = 6). Box and whisker plot with median represented as the line through the box and whiskers representing values within 1.5 interquartile range (IQR) of the first and third quartiles. Means as black dot and bold error bars represent 95% CI. Data estimated from the representative experiment reported in Figure 1B of is displayed as a single point (red circle) for comparison. Statistical analysis was performed on log 10 -transformed data generated during this replication attempt. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) of IDH1 and IDH2 groups: F (3, 20) = 56.8, p = 5.73 × 10 −10 . Planned contrasts between IDH1 WT and IDH1 R132H: t (20) = 8.33, uncorrected p = 6.23 × 10 −8 , Bonferroni corrected p = 1.25 × 10 −7 , Cohen’s d = 4.81, 95% CI [2.42, 7.15]; IDH2 WT and IDH2 R172K: t (20) = 9.35, uncorrected p = 9.71 × 10 −9 , Bonferroni corrected p = 1.94 × 10 −8 , Cohen’s d = 5.40, 95% CI [2.79, 7.96]. ( B ) Western blot analysis for HEK293T cells transfected with WT or the indicated mutant of IDH1 or IDH2, or empty vector. Methylation status from histone extracts of the indicated markers were normalized to H3 and then to vector for each biological repeat (n = 6). Box and whisker plot with median represented as the line through the box and whiskers representing values within 1.5 IQR of the first and third quartiles. For each marker a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA; or Kruskal–Wallis) was performed on IDH1 and IDH2 groups and the correlation with 2HG levels in A was performed. H3K4me2: H(3) = 0.367, uncorrected p = 0.947, Bonferroni corrected p > 0.99; correlation with 2HG: t (12) = 1.12, uncorrected p = 0.275, Bonferroni corrected p > 0.99. H3K9me2: F (3,20) = 0.793, uncorrected p = 0.512, Bonferroni corrected p > 0.99; correlation with 2HG: t (12) = 1.53, uncorrected p = 0.140, Bonferroni corrected p = 0.699. H3K9me3: F (3,20) = 0.515, uncorrected p = 0.676, Bonferroni corrected p > 0.99; correlation with 2HG: t (12) = 1.35, uncorrected p = 0.191, Bonferroni corrected p = 0.957. H3K36me3: F (3,20) = 0.248, uncorrected p = 0.862, Bonferroni corrected p > 0.99; correlation with 2HG: t (12) = 0.725, uncorrected p = 0.476, Bonferroni corrected p > 0.99. H3K79me2: H(3) = 1.55, uncorrected p = 0.672, Bonferroni corrected p > 0.99; correlation with 2HG: t (12) = 0.752, uncorrected p = 0.460, Bonferroni corrected p > 0.99. Planned contrasts for H3K9me2 between IDH1 WT and IDH1 R132H: t (20) = −0.238, uncorrected p = 0.815, Bonferroni corrected p > 0.99; IDH2 WT and IDH2 R172K: t (20) = 1.31, uncorrected p = 0.203, Bonferroni corrected p > 0.99. ( C ) 3T3-L1 cells were transduced to express the indicated proteins and analyzed and presented in the same way as A . Number of independent biological repeats (n = 5). Data estimated from the representative experiment reported in Figure 2A of is displayed as a single point (red circle) for comparison. Statistical analysis was performed on log 10 -transformed data generated during this replication attempt. Student’s t -test of IDH2 WT and IDH2 R172K: t (8) = 14.3, p = 5.49 × 10 −7 , Cohen’s d = 9.06, 95% CI [4.53, 13.57]. Additional details can be found at https://osf.io/vfsbo/ .
Rabbit Anti Idh1, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/rabbit anti idh1/product/Proteintech
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
rabbit anti idh1 - by Bioz Stars, 2024-10
94/100 stars

Images

1) Product Images from "Experiments from unfinished Registered Reports in the Reproducibility Project: Cancer Biology"

Article Title: Experiments from unfinished Registered Reports in the Reproducibility Project: Cancer Biology

Journal: eLife

doi: 10.7554/eLife.73430

( A ) HEK293T cells transfected with wild-type (WT) or the indicated mutant of IDH1 or IDH2, or empty vector, were analyzed for intracellular metabolites 72 hr after transfection by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS). Quantitation of 2HG single intensity relative to glutamate was determined using total ion chromatograms (TIC) for each biological repeat (n = 6). Box and whisker plot with median represented as the line through the box and whiskers representing values within 1.5 interquartile range (IQR) of the first and third quartiles. Means as black dot and bold error bars represent 95% CI. Data estimated from the representative experiment reported in Figure 1B of is displayed as a single point (red circle) for comparison. Statistical analysis was performed on log 10 -transformed data generated during this replication attempt. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) of IDH1 and IDH2 groups: F (3, 20) = 56.8, p = 5.73 × 10 −10 . Planned contrasts between IDH1 WT and IDH1 R132H: t (20) = 8.33, uncorrected p = 6.23 × 10 −8 , Bonferroni corrected p = 1.25 × 10 −7 , Cohen’s d = 4.81, 95% CI [2.42, 7.15]; IDH2 WT and IDH2 R172K: t (20) = 9.35, uncorrected p = 9.71 × 10 −9 , Bonferroni corrected p = 1.94 × 10 −8 , Cohen’s d = 5.40, 95% CI [2.79, 7.96]. ( B ) Western blot analysis for HEK293T cells transfected with WT or the indicated mutant of IDH1 or IDH2, or empty vector. Methylation status from histone extracts of the indicated markers were normalized to H3 and then to vector for each biological repeat (n = 6). Box and whisker plot with median represented as the line through the box and whiskers representing values within 1.5 IQR of the first and third quartiles. For each marker a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA; or Kruskal–Wallis) was performed on IDH1 and IDH2 groups and the correlation with 2HG levels in A was performed. H3K4me2: H(3) = 0.367, uncorrected p = 0.947, Bonferroni corrected p > 0.99; correlation with 2HG: t (12) = 1.12, uncorrected p = 0.275, Bonferroni corrected p > 0.99. H3K9me2: F (3,20) = 0.793, uncorrected p = 0.512, Bonferroni corrected p > 0.99; correlation with 2HG: t (12) = 1.53, uncorrected p = 0.140, Bonferroni corrected p = 0.699. H3K9me3: F (3,20) = 0.515, uncorrected p = 0.676, Bonferroni corrected p > 0.99; correlation with 2HG: t (12) = 1.35, uncorrected p = 0.191, Bonferroni corrected p = 0.957. H3K36me3: F (3,20) = 0.248, uncorrected p = 0.862, Bonferroni corrected p > 0.99; correlation with 2HG: t (12) = 0.725, uncorrected p = 0.476, Bonferroni corrected p > 0.99. H3K79me2: H(3) = 1.55, uncorrected p = 0.672, Bonferroni corrected p > 0.99; correlation with 2HG: t (12) = 0.752, uncorrected p = 0.460, Bonferroni corrected p > 0.99. Planned contrasts for H3K9me2 between IDH1 WT and IDH1 R132H: t (20) = −0.238, uncorrected p = 0.815, Bonferroni corrected p > 0.99; IDH2 WT and IDH2 R172K: t (20) = 1.31, uncorrected p = 0.203, Bonferroni corrected p > 0.99. ( C ) 3T3-L1 cells were transduced to express the indicated proteins and analyzed and presented in the same way as A . Number of independent biological repeats (n = 5). Data estimated from the representative experiment reported in Figure 2A of is displayed as a single point (red circle) for comparison. Statistical analysis was performed on log 10 -transformed data generated during this replication attempt. Student’s t -test of IDH2 WT and IDH2 R172K: t (8) = 14.3, p = 5.49 × 10 −7 , Cohen’s d = 9.06, 95% CI [4.53, 13.57]. Additional details can be found at https://osf.io/vfsbo/ .
Figure Legend Snippet: ( A ) HEK293T cells transfected with wild-type (WT) or the indicated mutant of IDH1 or IDH2, or empty vector, were analyzed for intracellular metabolites 72 hr after transfection by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS). Quantitation of 2HG single intensity relative to glutamate was determined using total ion chromatograms (TIC) for each biological repeat (n = 6). Box and whisker plot with median represented as the line through the box and whiskers representing values within 1.5 interquartile range (IQR) of the first and third quartiles. Means as black dot and bold error bars represent 95% CI. Data estimated from the representative experiment reported in Figure 1B of is displayed as a single point (red circle) for comparison. Statistical analysis was performed on log 10 -transformed data generated during this replication attempt. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) of IDH1 and IDH2 groups: F (3, 20) = 56.8, p = 5.73 × 10 −10 . Planned contrasts between IDH1 WT and IDH1 R132H: t (20) = 8.33, uncorrected p = 6.23 × 10 −8 , Bonferroni corrected p = 1.25 × 10 −7 , Cohen’s d = 4.81, 95% CI [2.42, 7.15]; IDH2 WT and IDH2 R172K: t (20) = 9.35, uncorrected p = 9.71 × 10 −9 , Bonferroni corrected p = 1.94 × 10 −8 , Cohen’s d = 5.40, 95% CI [2.79, 7.96]. ( B ) Western blot analysis for HEK293T cells transfected with WT or the indicated mutant of IDH1 or IDH2, or empty vector. Methylation status from histone extracts of the indicated markers were normalized to H3 and then to vector for each biological repeat (n = 6). Box and whisker plot with median represented as the line through the box and whiskers representing values within 1.5 IQR of the first and third quartiles. For each marker a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA; or Kruskal–Wallis) was performed on IDH1 and IDH2 groups and the correlation with 2HG levels in A was performed. H3K4me2: H(3) = 0.367, uncorrected p = 0.947, Bonferroni corrected p > 0.99; correlation with 2HG: t (12) = 1.12, uncorrected p = 0.275, Bonferroni corrected p > 0.99. H3K9me2: F (3,20) = 0.793, uncorrected p = 0.512, Bonferroni corrected p > 0.99; correlation with 2HG: t (12) = 1.53, uncorrected p = 0.140, Bonferroni corrected p = 0.699. H3K9me3: F (3,20) = 0.515, uncorrected p = 0.676, Bonferroni corrected p > 0.99; correlation with 2HG: t (12) = 1.35, uncorrected p = 0.191, Bonferroni corrected p = 0.957. H3K36me3: F (3,20) = 0.248, uncorrected p = 0.862, Bonferroni corrected p > 0.99; correlation with 2HG: t (12) = 0.725, uncorrected p = 0.476, Bonferroni corrected p > 0.99. H3K79me2: H(3) = 1.55, uncorrected p = 0.672, Bonferroni corrected p > 0.99; correlation with 2HG: t (12) = 0.752, uncorrected p = 0.460, Bonferroni corrected p > 0.99. Planned contrasts for H3K9me2 between IDH1 WT and IDH1 R132H: t (20) = −0.238, uncorrected p = 0.815, Bonferroni corrected p > 0.99; IDH2 WT and IDH2 R172K: t (20) = 1.31, uncorrected p = 0.203, Bonferroni corrected p > 0.99. ( C ) 3T3-L1 cells were transduced to express the indicated proteins and analyzed and presented in the same way as A . Number of independent biological repeats (n = 5). Data estimated from the representative experiment reported in Figure 2A of is displayed as a single point (red circle) for comparison. Statistical analysis was performed on log 10 -transformed data generated during this replication attempt. Student’s t -test of IDH2 WT and IDH2 R172K: t (8) = 14.3, p = 5.49 × 10 −7 , Cohen’s d = 9.06, 95% CI [4.53, 13.57]. Additional details can be found at https://osf.io/vfsbo/ .

Techniques Used: Transfection, Mutagenesis, Plasmid Preparation, Gas Chromatography, Mass Spectrometry, Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry, Quantitation Assay, Whisker Assay, Transformation Assay, Generated, Western Blot, Methylation, Marker

( A ) This is the same experiment as in . Representative Western blots (experiment performed independently six times) of histone extractions from HEK293T cells transfected with the indicated plasmids. Membranes were probed with the indicated antibodies (total H3 served as loading control). ( B ) This is the same experiment as in . Representative total ion chromatograms (TIC) from samples harvested 72 hr after transfection for the indicated transfected HEK293T cells. The detection of 2HG and glutamate are shown and based on spectra of derivatized commercial standards. ( C ) This is the same experiment as in . Representative Western blots (experiment performed independently six times) of histone extractions from 3T3-L1 cells transduced to express the indicated proteins. Membranes were probed with IDH1 and IDH2. ( D ) This is the same experiment as in . Representative TIC from samples harvested 7 days after transduction to express the indicated proteins in 3T-L1 cells. The detection of 2HG and glutamate are shown and based on spectra of derivatized commercial standards. Additional details can be found at https://osf.io/vfsbo/ .
Figure Legend Snippet: ( A ) This is the same experiment as in . Representative Western blots (experiment performed independently six times) of histone extractions from HEK293T cells transfected with the indicated plasmids. Membranes were probed with the indicated antibodies (total H3 served as loading control). ( B ) This is the same experiment as in . Representative total ion chromatograms (TIC) from samples harvested 72 hr after transfection for the indicated transfected HEK293T cells. The detection of 2HG and glutamate are shown and based on spectra of derivatized commercial standards. ( C ) This is the same experiment as in . Representative Western blots (experiment performed independently six times) of histone extractions from 3T3-L1 cells transduced to express the indicated proteins. Membranes were probed with IDH1 and IDH2. ( D ) This is the same experiment as in . Representative TIC from samples harvested 7 days after transduction to express the indicated proteins in 3T-L1 cells. The detection of 2HG and glutamate are shown and based on spectra of derivatized commercial standards. Additional details can be found at https://osf.io/vfsbo/ .

Techniques Used: Western Blot, Transfection, Transduction

Meta-analysis of each effect reported in . Effect size and 95 % confidence intervals are presented for , this replication study (Reproducibility Project: Cancer Biology, RP:CB), and a random-effects meta-analysis of those two effects. The effect size r is a standardized measure of the correlation (strength and direction) of the association between two variables and Cohen’s d is a standardized difference between the two indicated measurements where a larger value indicates a difference in expression between the two conditions. ( A ) Meta-analysis p values: H3K4me3 expression ( p = 0.235), H3K9me2 expression ( p = 0.117), H3K9me3 expression ( p = 0.135), H3K36me3 expression ( p = 0.133), and H3K79me2 expression ( p = 0.090). ( B ) Meta-analysis p values: H3K9me2 expression between IDH1 WT and IDH1 R132H ( p = 0.398), and H3K9me2 expression between IDH2 WT and IDH2 R172K ( p = 0.202). ( C ) Meta-analysis p values: correlation of H3K4me3 expression and 2HG ( p = 0.122), correlation of H3K9me2 expression and 2HG ( p = 0.092), correlation of H3K9me3 expression and 2HG ( p = 0.081), correlation of H3K36me3 expression and 2HG ( p = 0.181), and correlation of H3K79me2 expression and 2HG ( p = 0.185). Sample sizes used in and RP:CB are reported under the study name. Additional details can be found at https://osf.io/vfsbo/ .
Figure Legend Snippet: Meta-analysis of each effect reported in . Effect size and 95 % confidence intervals are presented for , this replication study (Reproducibility Project: Cancer Biology, RP:CB), and a random-effects meta-analysis of those two effects. The effect size r is a standardized measure of the correlation (strength and direction) of the association between two variables and Cohen’s d is a standardized difference between the two indicated measurements where a larger value indicates a difference in expression between the two conditions. ( A ) Meta-analysis p values: H3K4me3 expression ( p = 0.235), H3K9me2 expression ( p = 0.117), H3K9me3 expression ( p = 0.135), H3K36me3 expression ( p = 0.133), and H3K79me2 expression ( p = 0.090). ( B ) Meta-analysis p values: H3K9me2 expression between IDH1 WT and IDH1 R132H ( p = 0.398), and H3K9me2 expression between IDH2 WT and IDH2 R172K ( p = 0.202). ( C ) Meta-analysis p values: correlation of H3K4me3 expression and 2HG ( p = 0.122), correlation of H3K9me2 expression and 2HG ( p = 0.092), correlation of H3K9me3 expression and 2HG ( p = 0.081), correlation of H3K36me3 expression and 2HG ( p = 0.181), and correlation of H3K79me2 expression and 2HG ( p = 0.185). Sample sizes used in and RP:CB are reported under the study name. Additional details can be found at https://osf.io/vfsbo/ .

Techniques Used: Expressing


Figure Legend Snippet:

Techniques Used: Software, Infection, Recombinant, Plasmid Preparation


Structured Review

Proteintech anti idh1
Anti Idh1, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/anti idh1/product/Proteintech
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
anti idh1 - by Bioz Stars, 2024-10
94/100 stars

Images

Similar Products

  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 94
    Proteintech idh1
    Idh1, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/idh1/product/Proteintech
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
    idh1 - by Bioz Stars, 2024-10
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    Proteintech anti idh1 mab
    The immunocytochemistry of <t>IDH1</t> in MG63 and U2OS . IDH1 is specifically detected in the cytoplasm of both osteosarcoma cell lines MG63 and U2OS.(A) Expression of IDH1 in U2OS, × 200; (B) Expression of IDH1 in MG63,× 200; (C) Expression of IDH1 in U2OS,× 400; (D) Expression of IDH1 in MG63,× 400.
    Anti Idh1 Mab, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/anti idh1 mab/product/Proteintech
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
    anti idh1 mab - by Bioz Stars, 2024-10
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    Proteintech 1 ap
    The immunocytochemistry of <t>IDH1</t> in MG63 and U2OS . IDH1 is specifically detected in the cytoplasm of both osteosarcoma cell lines MG63 and U2OS.(A) Expression of IDH1 in U2OS, × 200; (B) Expression of IDH1 in MG63,× 200; (C) Expression of IDH1 in U2OS,× 400; (D) Expression of IDH1 in MG63,× 400.
    1 Ap, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/1 ap/product/Proteintech
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
    1 ap - by Bioz Stars, 2024-10
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    Proteintech anti idh1
    The immunocytochemistry of <t>IDH1</t> in MG63 and U2OS . IDH1 is specifically detected in the cytoplasm of both osteosarcoma cell lines MG63 and U2OS.(A) Expression of IDH1 in U2OS, × 200; (B) Expression of IDH1 in MG63,× 200; (C) Expression of IDH1 in U2OS,× 400; (D) Expression of IDH1 in MG63,× 400.
    Anti Idh1, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/anti idh1/product/Proteintech
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
    anti idh1 - by Bioz Stars, 2024-10
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    Proteintech 1 ap rrid ab 2123159
    The immunocytochemistry of <t>IDH1</t> in MG63 and U2OS . IDH1 is specifically detected in the cytoplasm of both osteosarcoma cell lines MG63 and U2OS.(A) Expression of IDH1 in U2OS, × 200; (B) Expression of IDH1 in MG63,× 200; (C) Expression of IDH1 in U2OS,× 400; (D) Expression of IDH1 in MG63,× 400.
    1 Ap Rrid Ab 2123159, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/1 ap rrid ab 2123159/product/Proteintech
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
    1 ap rrid ab 2123159 - by Bioz Stars, 2024-10
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    Proteintech rabbit anti idh1
    ( A ) HEK293T cells transfected with wild-type (WT) or the indicated mutant of <t>IDH1</t> or IDH2, or empty vector, were analyzed for intracellular metabolites 72 hr after transfection by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS). Quantitation of 2HG single intensity relative to glutamate was determined using total ion chromatograms (TIC) for each biological repeat (n = 6). Box and whisker plot with median represented as the line through the box and whiskers representing values within 1.5 interquartile range (IQR) of the first and third quartiles. Means as black dot and bold error bars represent 95% CI. Data estimated from the representative experiment reported in Figure 1B of is displayed as a single point (red circle) for comparison. Statistical analysis was performed on log 10 -transformed data generated during this replication attempt. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) of IDH1 and IDH2 groups: F (3, 20) = 56.8, p = 5.73 × 10 −10 . Planned contrasts between IDH1 WT and IDH1 R132H: t (20) = 8.33, uncorrected p = 6.23 × 10 −8 , Bonferroni corrected p = 1.25 × 10 −7 , Cohen’s d = 4.81, 95% CI [2.42, 7.15]; IDH2 WT and IDH2 R172K: t (20) = 9.35, uncorrected p = 9.71 × 10 −9 , Bonferroni corrected p = 1.94 × 10 −8 , Cohen’s d = 5.40, 95% CI [2.79, 7.96]. ( B ) Western blot analysis for HEK293T cells transfected with WT or the indicated mutant of IDH1 or IDH2, or empty vector. Methylation status from histone extracts of the indicated markers were normalized to H3 and then to vector for each biological repeat (n = 6). Box and whisker plot with median represented as the line through the box and whiskers representing values within 1.5 IQR of the first and third quartiles. For each marker a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA; or Kruskal–Wallis) was performed on IDH1 and IDH2 groups and the correlation with 2HG levels in A was performed. H3K4me2: H(3) = 0.367, uncorrected p = 0.947, Bonferroni corrected p > 0.99; correlation with 2HG: t (12) = 1.12, uncorrected p = 0.275, Bonferroni corrected p > 0.99. H3K9me2: F (3,20) = 0.793, uncorrected p = 0.512, Bonferroni corrected p > 0.99; correlation with 2HG: t (12) = 1.53, uncorrected p = 0.140, Bonferroni corrected p = 0.699. H3K9me3: F (3,20) = 0.515, uncorrected p = 0.676, Bonferroni corrected p > 0.99; correlation with 2HG: t (12) = 1.35, uncorrected p = 0.191, Bonferroni corrected p = 0.957. H3K36me3: F (3,20) = 0.248, uncorrected p = 0.862, Bonferroni corrected p > 0.99; correlation with 2HG: t (12) = 0.725, uncorrected p = 0.476, Bonferroni corrected p > 0.99. H3K79me2: H(3) = 1.55, uncorrected p = 0.672, Bonferroni corrected p > 0.99; correlation with 2HG: t (12) = 0.752, uncorrected p = 0.460, Bonferroni corrected p > 0.99. Planned contrasts for H3K9me2 between IDH1 WT and IDH1 R132H: t (20) = −0.238, uncorrected p = 0.815, Bonferroni corrected p > 0.99; IDH2 WT and IDH2 R172K: t (20) = 1.31, uncorrected p = 0.203, Bonferroni corrected p > 0.99. ( C ) 3T3-L1 cells were transduced to express the indicated proteins and analyzed and presented in the same way as A . Number of independent biological repeats (n = 5). Data estimated from the representative experiment reported in Figure 2A of is displayed as a single point (red circle) for comparison. Statistical analysis was performed on log 10 -transformed data generated during this replication attempt. Student’s t -test of IDH2 WT and IDH2 R172K: t (8) = 14.3, p = 5.49 × 10 −7 , Cohen’s d = 9.06, 95% CI [4.53, 13.57]. Additional details can be found at https://osf.io/vfsbo/ .
    Rabbit Anti Idh1, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/rabbit anti idh1/product/Proteintech
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
    rabbit anti idh1 - by Bioz Stars, 2024-10
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    The immunocytochemistry of IDH1 in MG63 and U2OS . IDH1 is specifically detected in the cytoplasm of both osteosarcoma cell lines MG63 and U2OS.(A) Expression of IDH1 in U2OS, × 200; (B) Expression of IDH1 in MG63,× 200; (C) Expression of IDH1 in U2OS,× 400; (D) Expression of IDH1 in MG63,× 400.

    Journal: Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research : CR

    Article Title: The expression and significance of IDH1 and p53 in osteosarcoma

    doi: 10.1186/1756-9966-29-43

    Figure Lengend Snippet: The immunocytochemistry of IDH1 in MG63 and U2OS . IDH1 is specifically detected in the cytoplasm of both osteosarcoma cell lines MG63 and U2OS.(A) Expression of IDH1 in U2OS, × 200; (B) Expression of IDH1 in MG63,× 200; (C) Expression of IDH1 in U2OS,× 400; (D) Expression of IDH1 in MG63,× 400.

    Article Snippet: They were incubated in anti-IDH1 mAb (protein technology group, USA) or anti-p53 mAb (Santa Cruz, CA, USA) for 1 h at room temperature, followed by secondary antibody and peroxidase-conjugated strepavidin-biotin complex (Santa Cruz, CA, USA) at 37°C for 30 min. Immunoreactivity was visualized with diaminobenzidine (DAB) (Zymed, South San Francisco, CA).

    Techniques: Immunocytochemistry, Expressing

    The mRNA levels of IDH1 in MG63 and U2OS (on fold) . The mRNA levels of IDH1 is higher in U2OS than in MG63( P < 0.01).

    Journal: Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research : CR

    Article Title: The expression and significance of IDH1 and p53 in osteosarcoma

    doi: 10.1186/1756-9966-29-43

    Figure Lengend Snippet: The mRNA levels of IDH1 in MG63 and U2OS (on fold) . The mRNA levels of IDH1 is higher in U2OS than in MG63( P < 0.01).

    Article Snippet: They were incubated in anti-IDH1 mAb (protein technology group, USA) or anti-p53 mAb (Santa Cruz, CA, USA) for 1 h at room temperature, followed by secondary antibody and peroxidase-conjugated strepavidin-biotin complex (Santa Cruz, CA, USA) at 37°C for 30 min. Immunoreactivity was visualized with diaminobenzidine (DAB) (Zymed, South San Francisco, CA).

    Techniques:

    The protein expression levels of IDH1 and p53 in U2OS and MG63 . MG63 demonstrates no detectable p53 while U2OS cells demonstrates a high expressed p53. IDH1 expresses higher in U2OS than in MG63 at the protein level( P < 0.01).

    Journal: Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research : CR

    Article Title: The expression and significance of IDH1 and p53 in osteosarcoma

    doi: 10.1186/1756-9966-29-43

    Figure Lengend Snippet: The protein expression levels of IDH1 and p53 in U2OS and MG63 . MG63 demonstrates no detectable p53 while U2OS cells demonstrates a high expressed p53. IDH1 expresses higher in U2OS than in MG63 at the protein level( P < 0.01).

    Article Snippet: They were incubated in anti-IDH1 mAb (protein technology group, USA) or anti-p53 mAb (Santa Cruz, CA, USA) for 1 h at room temperature, followed by secondary antibody and peroxidase-conjugated strepavidin-biotin complex (Santa Cruz, CA, USA) at 37°C for 30 min. Immunoreactivity was visualized with diaminobenzidine (DAB) (Zymed, South San Francisco, CA).

    Techniques: Expressing

    The expression of IDH1 and p53 in low histological Rosen grade biopsy . IDH1 expresses at high level accompanying with high expressed p53 in Low histological Rosen grade biopsy.(A) Expression of IDH1 in low histological Rosen grade biopsy, × 100;(B) Expression of p53 in low histological Rosen grade biopsy, × 100; (C) Expression of IDH1 in low histological Rosen grade biopsy, × 200;(D) Expression of p53 in low histological Rosen grade biopsy, × 200.

    Journal: Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research : CR

    Article Title: The expression and significance of IDH1 and p53 in osteosarcoma

    doi: 10.1186/1756-9966-29-43

    Figure Lengend Snippet: The expression of IDH1 and p53 in low histological Rosen grade biopsy . IDH1 expresses at high level accompanying with high expressed p53 in Low histological Rosen grade biopsy.(A) Expression of IDH1 in low histological Rosen grade biopsy, × 100;(B) Expression of p53 in low histological Rosen grade biopsy, × 100; (C) Expression of IDH1 in low histological Rosen grade biopsy, × 200;(D) Expression of p53 in low histological Rosen grade biopsy, × 200.

    Article Snippet: They were incubated in anti-IDH1 mAb (protein technology group, USA) or anti-p53 mAb (Santa Cruz, CA, USA) for 1 h at room temperature, followed by secondary antibody and peroxidase-conjugated strepavidin-biotin complex (Santa Cruz, CA, USA) at 37°C for 30 min. Immunoreactivity was visualized with diaminobenzidine (DAB) (Zymed, South San Francisco, CA).

    Techniques: Expressing

    The expression of IDH1 and p53 in high histological Rosen grade biopsy . IDH1 expresses at low level accompanying with low expressed p53 in high histological Rosen grade biopsy.(A) Expression of IDH1 in high histological Rosen grade biopsy, × 100;(B) Expression of p53 in high histological Rosen grade biopsy, × 100; (C) Expression of IDH1 in high histological Rosen grade biopsy, × 200;(D) Expression of p53 in high histological Rosen grade biopsy, × 200.

    Journal: Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research : CR

    Article Title: The expression and significance of IDH1 and p53 in osteosarcoma

    doi: 10.1186/1756-9966-29-43

    Figure Lengend Snippet: The expression of IDH1 and p53 in high histological Rosen grade biopsy . IDH1 expresses at low level accompanying with low expressed p53 in high histological Rosen grade biopsy.(A) Expression of IDH1 in high histological Rosen grade biopsy, × 100;(B) Expression of p53 in high histological Rosen grade biopsy, × 100; (C) Expression of IDH1 in high histological Rosen grade biopsy, × 200;(D) Expression of p53 in high histological Rosen grade biopsy, × 200.

    Article Snippet: They were incubated in anti-IDH1 mAb (protein technology group, USA) or anti-p53 mAb (Santa Cruz, CA, USA) for 1 h at room temperature, followed by secondary antibody and peroxidase-conjugated strepavidin-biotin complex (Santa Cruz, CA, USA) at 37°C for 30 min. Immunoreactivity was visualized with diaminobenzidine (DAB) (Zymed, South San Francisco, CA).

    Techniques: Expressing

    The expression of  IDH1  and P53 in osteosarcoma biopsies

    Journal: Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research : CR

    Article Title: The expression and significance of IDH1 and p53 in osteosarcoma

    doi: 10.1186/1756-9966-29-43

    Figure Lengend Snippet: The expression of IDH1 and P53 in osteosarcoma biopsies

    Article Snippet: They were incubated in anti-IDH1 mAb (protein technology group, USA) or anti-p53 mAb (Santa Cruz, CA, USA) for 1 h at room temperature, followed by secondary antibody and peroxidase-conjugated strepavidin-biotin complex (Santa Cruz, CA, USA) at 37°C for 30 min. Immunoreactivity was visualized with diaminobenzidine (DAB) (Zymed, South San Francisco, CA).

    Techniques: Expressing

    The immunostaining percentages of IDH1 and p53 in low Rosen grade vs. high Rosen grade . IDH1 expresses higher in Low histological Rosen grade compare with high histological Rosen grade at the level of the immunostaining percentages ( P < 0.01), so does p53 ( P < 0.01).

    Journal: Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research : CR

    Article Title: The expression and significance of IDH1 and p53 in osteosarcoma

    doi: 10.1186/1756-9966-29-43

    Figure Lengend Snippet: The immunostaining percentages of IDH1 and p53 in low Rosen grade vs. high Rosen grade . IDH1 expresses higher in Low histological Rosen grade compare with high histological Rosen grade at the level of the immunostaining percentages ( P < 0.01), so does p53 ( P < 0.01).

    Article Snippet: They were incubated in anti-IDH1 mAb (protein technology group, USA) or anti-p53 mAb (Santa Cruz, CA, USA) for 1 h at room temperature, followed by secondary antibody and peroxidase-conjugated strepavidin-biotin complex (Santa Cruz, CA, USA) at 37°C for 30 min. Immunoreactivity was visualized with diaminobenzidine (DAB) (Zymed, South San Francisco, CA).

    Techniques: Immunostaining

    The immunostaining scores of IDH1 and p53 in low Rosen grade vs. high Rosen grade . IDH1 expresses higher in Low histological Rosen grade compare with high histological Rosen grade at the level of the immunostaining scores ( P < 0.05), so does p53 ( P < 0.01).

    Journal: Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research : CR

    Article Title: The expression and significance of IDH1 and p53 in osteosarcoma

    doi: 10.1186/1756-9966-29-43

    Figure Lengend Snippet: The immunostaining scores of IDH1 and p53 in low Rosen grade vs. high Rosen grade . IDH1 expresses higher in Low histological Rosen grade compare with high histological Rosen grade at the level of the immunostaining scores ( P < 0.05), so does p53 ( P < 0.01).

    Article Snippet: They were incubated in anti-IDH1 mAb (protein technology group, USA) or anti-p53 mAb (Santa Cruz, CA, USA) for 1 h at room temperature, followed by secondary antibody and peroxidase-conjugated strepavidin-biotin complex (Santa Cruz, CA, USA) at 37°C for 30 min. Immunoreactivity was visualized with diaminobenzidine (DAB) (Zymed, South San Francisco, CA).

    Techniques: Immunostaining

    The relationship between IDH1 and survival . The IDH1 high expression group represents the osteosarcoma patients with >50% IDH1 positive staining. Patients with ≤ 50% IDH1 positive staining are recorded as low-expression group. The survival time in the χ -axis was given as years. There is no significant correlation between IDH1 expression and overall survival ( P = 0.342).

    Journal: Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research : CR

    Article Title: The expression and significance of IDH1 and p53 in osteosarcoma

    doi: 10.1186/1756-9966-29-43

    Figure Lengend Snippet: The relationship between IDH1 and survival . The IDH1 high expression group represents the osteosarcoma patients with >50% IDH1 positive staining. Patients with ≤ 50% IDH1 positive staining are recorded as low-expression group. The survival time in the χ -axis was given as years. There is no significant correlation between IDH1 expression and overall survival ( P = 0.342).

    Article Snippet: They were incubated in anti-IDH1 mAb (protein technology group, USA) or anti-p53 mAb (Santa Cruz, CA, USA) for 1 h at room temperature, followed by secondary antibody and peroxidase-conjugated strepavidin-biotin complex (Santa Cruz, CA, USA) at 37°C for 30 min. Immunoreactivity was visualized with diaminobenzidine (DAB) (Zymed, South San Francisco, CA).

    Techniques: Expressing, Staining

    ( A ) HEK293T cells transfected with wild-type (WT) or the indicated mutant of IDH1 or IDH2, or empty vector, were analyzed for intracellular metabolites 72 hr after transfection by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS). Quantitation of 2HG single intensity relative to glutamate was determined using total ion chromatograms (TIC) for each biological repeat (n = 6). Box and whisker plot with median represented as the line through the box and whiskers representing values within 1.5 interquartile range (IQR) of the first and third quartiles. Means as black dot and bold error bars represent 95% CI. Data estimated from the representative experiment reported in Figure 1B of is displayed as a single point (red circle) for comparison. Statistical analysis was performed on log 10 -transformed data generated during this replication attempt. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) of IDH1 and IDH2 groups: F (3, 20) = 56.8, p = 5.73 × 10 −10 . Planned contrasts between IDH1 WT and IDH1 R132H: t (20) = 8.33, uncorrected p = 6.23 × 10 −8 , Bonferroni corrected p = 1.25 × 10 −7 , Cohen’s d = 4.81, 95% CI [2.42, 7.15]; IDH2 WT and IDH2 R172K: t (20) = 9.35, uncorrected p = 9.71 × 10 −9 , Bonferroni corrected p = 1.94 × 10 −8 , Cohen’s d = 5.40, 95% CI [2.79, 7.96]. ( B ) Western blot analysis for HEK293T cells transfected with WT or the indicated mutant of IDH1 or IDH2, or empty vector. Methylation status from histone extracts of the indicated markers were normalized to H3 and then to vector for each biological repeat (n = 6). Box and whisker plot with median represented as the line through the box and whiskers representing values within 1.5 IQR of the first and third quartiles. For each marker a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA; or Kruskal–Wallis) was performed on IDH1 and IDH2 groups and the correlation with 2HG levels in A was performed. H3K4me2: H(3) = 0.367, uncorrected p = 0.947, Bonferroni corrected p > 0.99; correlation with 2HG: t (12) = 1.12, uncorrected p = 0.275, Bonferroni corrected p > 0.99. H3K9me2: F (3,20) = 0.793, uncorrected p = 0.512, Bonferroni corrected p > 0.99; correlation with 2HG: t (12) = 1.53, uncorrected p = 0.140, Bonferroni corrected p = 0.699. H3K9me3: F (3,20) = 0.515, uncorrected p = 0.676, Bonferroni corrected p > 0.99; correlation with 2HG: t (12) = 1.35, uncorrected p = 0.191, Bonferroni corrected p = 0.957. H3K36me3: F (3,20) = 0.248, uncorrected p = 0.862, Bonferroni corrected p > 0.99; correlation with 2HG: t (12) = 0.725, uncorrected p = 0.476, Bonferroni corrected p > 0.99. H3K79me2: H(3) = 1.55, uncorrected p = 0.672, Bonferroni corrected p > 0.99; correlation with 2HG: t (12) = 0.752, uncorrected p = 0.460, Bonferroni corrected p > 0.99. Planned contrasts for H3K9me2 between IDH1 WT and IDH1 R132H: t (20) = −0.238, uncorrected p = 0.815, Bonferroni corrected p > 0.99; IDH2 WT and IDH2 R172K: t (20) = 1.31, uncorrected p = 0.203, Bonferroni corrected p > 0.99. ( C ) 3T3-L1 cells were transduced to express the indicated proteins and analyzed and presented in the same way as A . Number of independent biological repeats (n = 5). Data estimated from the representative experiment reported in Figure 2A of is displayed as a single point (red circle) for comparison. Statistical analysis was performed on log 10 -transformed data generated during this replication attempt. Student’s t -test of IDH2 WT and IDH2 R172K: t (8) = 14.3, p = 5.49 × 10 −7 , Cohen’s d = 9.06, 95% CI [4.53, 13.57]. Additional details can be found at https://osf.io/vfsbo/ .

    Journal: eLife

    Article Title: Experiments from unfinished Registered Reports in the Reproducibility Project: Cancer Biology

    doi: 10.7554/eLife.73430

    Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) HEK293T cells transfected with wild-type (WT) or the indicated mutant of IDH1 or IDH2, or empty vector, were analyzed for intracellular metabolites 72 hr after transfection by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS). Quantitation of 2HG single intensity relative to glutamate was determined using total ion chromatograms (TIC) for each biological repeat (n = 6). Box and whisker plot with median represented as the line through the box and whiskers representing values within 1.5 interquartile range (IQR) of the first and third quartiles. Means as black dot and bold error bars represent 95% CI. Data estimated from the representative experiment reported in Figure 1B of is displayed as a single point (red circle) for comparison. Statistical analysis was performed on log 10 -transformed data generated during this replication attempt. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) of IDH1 and IDH2 groups: F (3, 20) = 56.8, p = 5.73 × 10 −10 . Planned contrasts between IDH1 WT and IDH1 R132H: t (20) = 8.33, uncorrected p = 6.23 × 10 −8 , Bonferroni corrected p = 1.25 × 10 −7 , Cohen’s d = 4.81, 95% CI [2.42, 7.15]; IDH2 WT and IDH2 R172K: t (20) = 9.35, uncorrected p = 9.71 × 10 −9 , Bonferroni corrected p = 1.94 × 10 −8 , Cohen’s d = 5.40, 95% CI [2.79, 7.96]. ( B ) Western blot analysis for HEK293T cells transfected with WT or the indicated mutant of IDH1 or IDH2, or empty vector. Methylation status from histone extracts of the indicated markers were normalized to H3 and then to vector for each biological repeat (n = 6). Box and whisker plot with median represented as the line through the box and whiskers representing values within 1.5 IQR of the first and third quartiles. For each marker a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA; or Kruskal–Wallis) was performed on IDH1 and IDH2 groups and the correlation with 2HG levels in A was performed. H3K4me2: H(3) = 0.367, uncorrected p = 0.947, Bonferroni corrected p > 0.99; correlation with 2HG: t (12) = 1.12, uncorrected p = 0.275, Bonferroni corrected p > 0.99. H3K9me2: F (3,20) = 0.793, uncorrected p = 0.512, Bonferroni corrected p > 0.99; correlation with 2HG: t (12) = 1.53, uncorrected p = 0.140, Bonferroni corrected p = 0.699. H3K9me3: F (3,20) = 0.515, uncorrected p = 0.676, Bonferroni corrected p > 0.99; correlation with 2HG: t (12) = 1.35, uncorrected p = 0.191, Bonferroni corrected p = 0.957. H3K36me3: F (3,20) = 0.248, uncorrected p = 0.862, Bonferroni corrected p > 0.99; correlation with 2HG: t (12) = 0.725, uncorrected p = 0.476, Bonferroni corrected p > 0.99. H3K79me2: H(3) = 1.55, uncorrected p = 0.672, Bonferroni corrected p > 0.99; correlation with 2HG: t (12) = 0.752, uncorrected p = 0.460, Bonferroni corrected p > 0.99. Planned contrasts for H3K9me2 between IDH1 WT and IDH1 R132H: t (20) = −0.238, uncorrected p = 0.815, Bonferroni corrected p > 0.99; IDH2 WT and IDH2 R172K: t (20) = 1.31, uncorrected p = 0.203, Bonferroni corrected p > 0.99. ( C ) 3T3-L1 cells were transduced to express the indicated proteins and analyzed and presented in the same way as A . Number of independent biological repeats (n = 5). Data estimated from the representative experiment reported in Figure 2A of is displayed as a single point (red circle) for comparison. Statistical analysis was performed on log 10 -transformed data generated during this replication attempt. Student’s t -test of IDH2 WT and IDH2 R172K: t (8) = 14.3, p = 5.49 × 10 −7 , Cohen’s d = 9.06, 95% CI [4.53, 13.57]. Additional details can be found at https://osf.io/vfsbo/ .

    Article Snippet: Antibody , rabbit anti-IDH1 , Proteintech , cat# 12332-1-AP; RRID: AB_2123159 , 1:1500 dilution.

    Techniques: Transfection, Mutagenesis, Plasmid Preparation, Gas Chromatography, Mass Spectrometry, Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry, Quantitation Assay, Whisker Assay, Transformation Assay, Generated, Western Blot, Methylation, Marker

    ( A ) This is the same experiment as in . Representative Western blots (experiment performed independently six times) of histone extractions from HEK293T cells transfected with the indicated plasmids. Membranes were probed with the indicated antibodies (total H3 served as loading control). ( B ) This is the same experiment as in . Representative total ion chromatograms (TIC) from samples harvested 72 hr after transfection for the indicated transfected HEK293T cells. The detection of 2HG and glutamate are shown and based on spectra of derivatized commercial standards. ( C ) This is the same experiment as in . Representative Western blots (experiment performed independently six times) of histone extractions from 3T3-L1 cells transduced to express the indicated proteins. Membranes were probed with IDH1 and IDH2. ( D ) This is the same experiment as in . Representative TIC from samples harvested 7 days after transduction to express the indicated proteins in 3T-L1 cells. The detection of 2HG and glutamate are shown and based on spectra of derivatized commercial standards. Additional details can be found at https://osf.io/vfsbo/ .

    Journal: eLife

    Article Title: Experiments from unfinished Registered Reports in the Reproducibility Project: Cancer Biology

    doi: 10.7554/eLife.73430

    Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) This is the same experiment as in . Representative Western blots (experiment performed independently six times) of histone extractions from HEK293T cells transfected with the indicated plasmids. Membranes were probed with the indicated antibodies (total H3 served as loading control). ( B ) This is the same experiment as in . Representative total ion chromatograms (TIC) from samples harvested 72 hr after transfection for the indicated transfected HEK293T cells. The detection of 2HG and glutamate are shown and based on spectra of derivatized commercial standards. ( C ) This is the same experiment as in . Representative Western blots (experiment performed independently six times) of histone extractions from 3T3-L1 cells transduced to express the indicated proteins. Membranes were probed with IDH1 and IDH2. ( D ) This is the same experiment as in . Representative TIC from samples harvested 7 days after transduction to express the indicated proteins in 3T-L1 cells. The detection of 2HG and glutamate are shown and based on spectra of derivatized commercial standards. Additional details can be found at https://osf.io/vfsbo/ .

    Article Snippet: Antibody , rabbit anti-IDH1 , Proteintech , cat# 12332-1-AP; RRID: AB_2123159 , 1:1500 dilution.

    Techniques: Western Blot, Transfection, Transduction

    Meta-analysis of each effect reported in . Effect size and 95 % confidence intervals are presented for , this replication study (Reproducibility Project: Cancer Biology, RP:CB), and a random-effects meta-analysis of those two effects. The effect size r is a standardized measure of the correlation (strength and direction) of the association between two variables and Cohen’s d is a standardized difference between the two indicated measurements where a larger value indicates a difference in expression between the two conditions. ( A ) Meta-analysis p values: H3K4me3 expression ( p = 0.235), H3K9me2 expression ( p = 0.117), H3K9me3 expression ( p = 0.135), H3K36me3 expression ( p = 0.133), and H3K79me2 expression ( p = 0.090). ( B ) Meta-analysis p values: H3K9me2 expression between IDH1 WT and IDH1 R132H ( p = 0.398), and H3K9me2 expression between IDH2 WT and IDH2 R172K ( p = 0.202). ( C ) Meta-analysis p values: correlation of H3K4me3 expression and 2HG ( p = 0.122), correlation of H3K9me2 expression and 2HG ( p = 0.092), correlation of H3K9me3 expression and 2HG ( p = 0.081), correlation of H3K36me3 expression and 2HG ( p = 0.181), and correlation of H3K79me2 expression and 2HG ( p = 0.185). Sample sizes used in and RP:CB are reported under the study name. Additional details can be found at https://osf.io/vfsbo/ .

    Journal: eLife

    Article Title: Experiments from unfinished Registered Reports in the Reproducibility Project: Cancer Biology

    doi: 10.7554/eLife.73430

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Meta-analysis of each effect reported in . Effect size and 95 % confidence intervals are presented for , this replication study (Reproducibility Project: Cancer Biology, RP:CB), and a random-effects meta-analysis of those two effects. The effect size r is a standardized measure of the correlation (strength and direction) of the association between two variables and Cohen’s d is a standardized difference between the two indicated measurements where a larger value indicates a difference in expression between the two conditions. ( A ) Meta-analysis p values: H3K4me3 expression ( p = 0.235), H3K9me2 expression ( p = 0.117), H3K9me3 expression ( p = 0.135), H3K36me3 expression ( p = 0.133), and H3K79me2 expression ( p = 0.090). ( B ) Meta-analysis p values: H3K9me2 expression between IDH1 WT and IDH1 R132H ( p = 0.398), and H3K9me2 expression between IDH2 WT and IDH2 R172K ( p = 0.202). ( C ) Meta-analysis p values: correlation of H3K4me3 expression and 2HG ( p = 0.122), correlation of H3K9me2 expression and 2HG ( p = 0.092), correlation of H3K9me3 expression and 2HG ( p = 0.081), correlation of H3K36me3 expression and 2HG ( p = 0.181), and correlation of H3K79me2 expression and 2HG ( p = 0.185). Sample sizes used in and RP:CB are reported under the study name. Additional details can be found at https://osf.io/vfsbo/ .

    Article Snippet: Antibody , rabbit anti-IDH1 , Proteintech , cat# 12332-1-AP; RRID: AB_2123159 , 1:1500 dilution.

    Techniques: Expressing

    Journal: eLife

    Article Title: Experiments from unfinished Registered Reports in the Reproducibility Project: Cancer Biology

    doi: 10.7554/eLife.73430

    Figure Lengend Snippet:

    Article Snippet: Antibody , rabbit anti-IDH1 , Proteintech , cat# 12332-1-AP; RRID: AB_2123159 , 1:1500 dilution.

    Techniques: Software, Infection, Recombinant, Plasmid Preparation