minimum inhibitory 112 concentrations mic  (ATCC)


Bioz Verified Symbol ATCC is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol ATCC manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 86

    Structured Review

    ATCC minimum inhibitory 112 concentrations mic
    Minimum Inhibitory 112 Concentrations Mic, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/minimum inhibitory 112 concentrations mic/product/ATCC
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
    minimum inhibitory 112 concentrations mic - by Bioz Stars, 2024-03
    86/100 stars

    Images

    e coli atcc 25922  (ATCC)


    Bioz Verified Symbol ATCC is a verified supplier
    Bioz Manufacturer Symbol ATCC manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 86

    Structured Review

    ATCC e coli atcc 25922
    E Coli Atcc 25922, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/e coli atcc 25922/product/ATCC
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
    e coli atcc 25922 - by Bioz Stars, 2024-03
    86/100 stars

    Images

    ef 64  (ATCC)


    Bioz Verified Symbol ATCC is a verified supplier
    Bioz Manufacturer Symbol ATCC manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 86

    Structured Review

    ATCC ef 64
    Experimental workflow for iTRAQ labeling and analysis: iTRAQ 8-plex labeling was performed for two sets of biological replicates of the strains Ef 63, Ef 64, ATCC 51299, and ATCC 29212. Each strain was labeled as follows for the two biological replicates: Ef 63 (113, 117), <t>Ef</t> <t>64</t> (114, 118), ATCC 51299 (115, 119), and ATCC 29212 (116, 121). The labeled fractions were combined and subjected to strong cation exchange chromatography and desalting, followed by separation using liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS), and bioinformatics data analysis.
    Ef 64, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/ef 64/product/ATCC
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
    ef 64 - by Bioz Stars, 2024-03
    86/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Quantitative Proteomics of Strong and Weak Biofilm Formers of Enterococcus faecalis Reveals Novel Regulators of Biofilm Formation"

    Article Title: Quantitative Proteomics of Strong and Weak Biofilm Formers of Enterococcus faecalis Reveals Novel Regulators of Biofilm Formation

    Journal: Molecular & Cellular Proteomics : MCP

    doi: 10.1074/mcp.RA117.000461

    Experimental workflow for iTRAQ labeling and analysis: iTRAQ 8-plex labeling was performed for two sets of biological replicates of the strains Ef 63, Ef 64, ATCC 51299, and ATCC 29212. Each strain was labeled as follows for the two biological replicates: Ef 63 (113, 117), Ef 64 (114, 118), ATCC 51299 (115, 119), and ATCC 29212 (116, 121). The labeled fractions were combined and subjected to strong cation exchange chromatography and desalting, followed by separation using liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS), and bioinformatics data analysis.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Experimental workflow for iTRAQ labeling and analysis: iTRAQ 8-plex labeling was performed for two sets of biological replicates of the strains Ef 63, Ef 64, ATCC 51299, and ATCC 29212. Each strain was labeled as follows for the two biological replicates: Ef 63 (113, 117), Ef 64 (114, 118), ATCC 51299 (115, 119), and ATCC 29212 (116, 121). The labeled fractions were combined and subjected to strong cation exchange chromatography and desalting, followed by separation using liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS), and bioinformatics data analysis.

    Techniques Used: Labeling, Chromatography, Liquid Chromatography, Mass Spectrometry, Liquid Chromatography with Mass Spectroscopy

    Determination of experimental variation for the identified proteins: (A) experimental variation of Ef 63 compared with ATCC 29212; (B) experimental variation of Ef 64 compared with ATCC 29212; (C) experimental variation of Ef 63 compared with ATCC 51299; and (D) experimental variation of Ef 64 compared with ATCC 51299. The horizontal axis represents % variation of iTRAQ ratios. The primary vertical axis represents the corresponding number of proteins (bars) having different % variation. The secondary vertical axis represents the cumulative % of the counted proteins. Variation against 88% coverage of population was considered as the cutoff value.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Determination of experimental variation for the identified proteins: (A) experimental variation of Ef 63 compared with ATCC 29212; (B) experimental variation of Ef 64 compared with ATCC 29212; (C) experimental variation of Ef 63 compared with ATCC 51299; and (D) experimental variation of Ef 64 compared with ATCC 51299. The horizontal axis represents % variation of iTRAQ ratios. The primary vertical axis represents the corresponding number of proteins (bars) having different % variation. The secondary vertical axis represents the cumulative % of the counted proteins. Variation against 88% coverage of population was considered as the cutoff value.

    Techniques Used:

    Volcano plots of differentially regulated proteins reveal significance patterns: (A) volcano plots of differentially regulated proteins of Ef 63 compared with ATCC 29212; (B) volcano plots of differentially regulated proteins of Ef 64 compared with ATCC 29212; (C) volcano plots of differentially regulated proteins of Ef 63 compared with ATCC 51299; and (D) volcano plots of differentially regulated proteins of Ef 64 compared with ATCC 51299. Threshold cutoffs determined for log2 fold change ratios are represented by green lines. p value cutoff of 0.05 is represented by a yellow line. Gray dots represent proteins that do not show significant differences in expression, yellow dots represent proteins that show significant differences in expression but within the cutoff log2 fold change ratios, and red dots represent proteins that show significant differences in expression outside the cut-off log2 fold change ratios.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Volcano plots of differentially regulated proteins reveal significance patterns: (A) volcano plots of differentially regulated proteins of Ef 63 compared with ATCC 29212; (B) volcano plots of differentially regulated proteins of Ef 64 compared with ATCC 29212; (C) volcano plots of differentially regulated proteins of Ef 63 compared with ATCC 51299; and (D) volcano plots of differentially regulated proteins of Ef 64 compared with ATCC 51299. Threshold cutoffs determined for log2 fold change ratios are represented by green lines. p value cutoff of 0.05 is represented by a yellow line. Gray dots represent proteins that do not show significant differences in expression, yellow dots represent proteins that show significant differences in expression but within the cutoff log2 fold change ratios, and red dots represent proteins that show significant differences in expression outside the cut-off log2 fold change ratios.

    Techniques Used: Expressing

    Functional classification of the significantly up-regulated proteins of  Ef 64  in comparison with both ATCC 29212 and 51299 strains meeting both p value cutoff and log 2 fold-change cutoff criteria
    Figure Legend Snippet: Functional classification of the significantly up-regulated proteins of Ef 64 in comparison with both ATCC 29212 and 51299 strains meeting both p value cutoff and log 2 fold-change cutoff criteria

    Techniques Used: Functional Assay

    Functional classification of the significantly down-regulated proteins of  Ef 64  in comparison with both ATCC 29212 and 51299 strains meeting both p value cutoff and log2-fold change cutoff criteria
    Figure Legend Snippet: Functional classification of the significantly down-regulated proteins of Ef 64 in comparison with both ATCC 29212 and 51299 strains meeting both p value cutoff and log2-fold change cutoff criteria

    Techniques Used: Functional Assay

    Gene ontology analysis of differentially regulated proteins reveals significantly affected pathways in Ef 63 and Ef 64: (A) biological processes, molecular functions, and cellular components that are significantly up-regulated in Ef 64 in comparison with ATCC 29212 and 51299 strains and (B) biological processes, molecular functions, and cellular components that are significantly down-regulated in Ef 63 in comparison with ATCC 29212 and 51299 strains.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Gene ontology analysis of differentially regulated proteins reveals significantly affected pathways in Ef 63 and Ef 64: (A) biological processes, molecular functions, and cellular components that are significantly up-regulated in Ef 64 in comparison with ATCC 29212 and 51299 strains and (B) biological processes, molecular functions, and cellular components that are significantly down-regulated in Ef 63 in comparison with ATCC 29212 and 51299 strains.

    Techniques Used:

    ef 64  (ATCC)


    Bioz Verified Symbol ATCC is a verified supplier
    Bioz Manufacturer Symbol ATCC manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 86

    Structured Review

    ATCC ef 64
    Experimental workflow for iTRAQ labeling and analysis: iTRAQ 8-plex labeling was performed for two sets of biological replicates of the strains Ef 63, Ef 64, ATCC 51299, and ATCC 29212. Each strain was labeled as follows for the two biological replicates: Ef 63 (113, 117), <t>Ef</t> <t>64</t> (114, 118), ATCC 51299 (115, 119), and ATCC 29212 (116, 121). The labeled fractions were combined and subjected to strong cation exchange chromatography and desalting, followed by separation using liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS), and bioinformatics data analysis.
    Ef 64, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/ef 64/product/ATCC
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
    ef 64 - by Bioz Stars, 2024-03
    86/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Quantitative Proteomics of Strong and Weak Biofilm Formers of Enterococcus faecalis Reveals Novel Regulators of Biofilm Formation * "

    Article Title: Quantitative Proteomics of Strong and Weak Biofilm Formers of Enterococcus faecalis Reveals Novel Regulators of Biofilm Formation *

    Journal: Molecular & Cellular Proteomics : MCP

    doi: 10.1074/mcp.RA117.000461

    Experimental workflow for iTRAQ labeling and analysis: iTRAQ 8-plex labeling was performed for two sets of biological replicates of the strains Ef 63, Ef 64, ATCC 51299, and ATCC 29212. Each strain was labeled as follows for the two biological replicates: Ef 63 (113, 117), Ef 64 (114, 118), ATCC 51299 (115, 119), and ATCC 29212 (116, 121). The labeled fractions were combined and subjected to strong cation exchange chromatography and desalting, followed by separation using liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS), and bioinformatics data analysis.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Experimental workflow for iTRAQ labeling and analysis: iTRAQ 8-plex labeling was performed for two sets of biological replicates of the strains Ef 63, Ef 64, ATCC 51299, and ATCC 29212. Each strain was labeled as follows for the two biological replicates: Ef 63 (113, 117), Ef 64 (114, 118), ATCC 51299 (115, 119), and ATCC 29212 (116, 121). The labeled fractions were combined and subjected to strong cation exchange chromatography and desalting, followed by separation using liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS), and bioinformatics data analysis.

    Techniques Used: Labeling, Chromatography, Liquid Chromatography, Mass Spectrometry, Liquid Chromatography with Mass Spectroscopy

    Determination of experimental variation for the identified proteins: (A) experimental variation of Ef 63 compared with ATCC 29212; (B) experimental variation of Ef 64 compared with ATCC 29212; (C) experimental variation of Ef 63 compared with ATCC 51299; and (D) experimental variation of Ef 64 compared with ATCC 51299. The horizontal axis represents % variation of iTRAQ ratios. The primary vertical axis represents the corresponding number of proteins (bars) having different % variation. The secondary vertical axis represents the cumulative % of the counted proteins. Variation against 88% coverage of population was considered as the cutoff value.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Determination of experimental variation for the identified proteins: (A) experimental variation of Ef 63 compared with ATCC 29212; (B) experimental variation of Ef 64 compared with ATCC 29212; (C) experimental variation of Ef 63 compared with ATCC 51299; and (D) experimental variation of Ef 64 compared with ATCC 51299. The horizontal axis represents % variation of iTRAQ ratios. The primary vertical axis represents the corresponding number of proteins (bars) having different % variation. The secondary vertical axis represents the cumulative % of the counted proteins. Variation against 88% coverage of population was considered as the cutoff value.

    Techniques Used:

    Volcano plots of differentially regulated proteins reveal significance patterns: (A) volcano plots of differentially regulated proteins of Ef 63 compared with ATCC 29212; (B) volcano plots of differentially regulated proteins of Ef 64 compared with ATCC 29212; (C) volcano plots of differentially regulated proteins of Ef 63 compared with ATCC 51299; and (D) volcano plots of differentially regulated proteins of Ef 64 compared with ATCC 51299. Threshold cutoffs determined for log2 fold change ratios are represented by green lines. p value cutoff of 0.05 is represented by a yellow line. Gray dots represent proteins that do not show significant differences in expression, yellow dots represent proteins that show significant differences in expression but within the cutoff log2 fold change ratios, and red dots represent proteins that show significant differences in expression outside the cut-off log2 fold change ratios.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Volcano plots of differentially regulated proteins reveal significance patterns: (A) volcano plots of differentially regulated proteins of Ef 63 compared with ATCC 29212; (B) volcano plots of differentially regulated proteins of Ef 64 compared with ATCC 29212; (C) volcano plots of differentially regulated proteins of Ef 63 compared with ATCC 51299; and (D) volcano plots of differentially regulated proteins of Ef 64 compared with ATCC 51299. Threshold cutoffs determined for log2 fold change ratios are represented by green lines. p value cutoff of 0.05 is represented by a yellow line. Gray dots represent proteins that do not show significant differences in expression, yellow dots represent proteins that show significant differences in expression but within the cutoff log2 fold change ratios, and red dots represent proteins that show significant differences in expression outside the cut-off log2 fold change ratios.

    Techniques Used: Expressing

    Functional classification of the significantly up-regulated proteins of  Ef 64  in comparison with both ATCC 29212 and 51299 strains meeting both p value cutoff and log 2 fold-change cutoff criteria
    Figure Legend Snippet: Functional classification of the significantly up-regulated proteins of Ef 64 in comparison with both ATCC 29212 and 51299 strains meeting both p value cutoff and log 2 fold-change cutoff criteria

    Techniques Used: Functional Assay

    Functional classification of the significantly down-regulated proteins of  Ef 64  in comparison with both ATCC 29212 and 51299 strains meeting both p value cutoff and log2-fold change cutoff criteria
    Figure Legend Snippet: Functional classification of the significantly down-regulated proteins of Ef 64 in comparison with both ATCC 29212 and 51299 strains meeting both p value cutoff and log2-fold change cutoff criteria

    Techniques Used: Functional Assay

    Gene ontology analysis of differentially regulated proteins reveals significantly affected pathways in Ef 63 and Ef 64: (A) biological processes, molecular functions, and cellular components that are significantly up-regulated in Ef 64 in comparison with ATCC 29212 and 51299 strains and (B) biological processes, molecular functions, and cellular components that are significantly down-regulated in Ef 63 in comparison with ATCC 29212 and 51299 strains.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Gene ontology analysis of differentially regulated proteins reveals significantly affected pathways in Ef 63 and Ef 64: (A) biological processes, molecular functions, and cellular components that are significantly up-regulated in Ef 64 in comparison with ATCC 29212 and 51299 strains and (B) biological processes, molecular functions, and cellular components that are significantly down-regulated in Ef 63 in comparison with ATCC 29212 and 51299 strains.

    Techniques Used:

    ef 64  (ATCC)


    Bioz Verified Symbol ATCC is a verified supplier
    Bioz Manufacturer Symbol ATCC manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 86

    Structured Review

    ATCC ef 64
    Experimental workflow for iTRAQ labeling and analysis: iTRAQ 8-plex labeling was performed for two sets of biological replicates of the strains Ef 63, Ef 64, ATCC 51299, and ATCC 29212. Each strain was labeled as follows for the two biological replicates: Ef 63 (113, 117), <t>Ef</t> <t>64</t> (114, 118), ATCC 51299 (115, 119), and ATCC 29212 (116, 121). The labeled fractions were combined and subjected to strong cation exchange chromatography and desalting, followed by separation using liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS), and bioinformatics data analysis.
    Ef 64, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/ef 64/product/ATCC
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
    ef 64 - by Bioz Stars, 2024-03
    86/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Quantitative Proteomics of Strong and Weak Biofilm Formers of Enterococcus faecalis Reveals Novel Regulators of Biofilm Formation * "

    Article Title: Quantitative Proteomics of Strong and Weak Biofilm Formers of Enterococcus faecalis Reveals Novel Regulators of Biofilm Formation *

    Journal: Molecular & Cellular Proteomics : MCP

    doi: 10.1074/mcp.RA117.000461

    Experimental workflow for iTRAQ labeling and analysis: iTRAQ 8-plex labeling was performed for two sets of biological replicates of the strains Ef 63, Ef 64, ATCC 51299, and ATCC 29212. Each strain was labeled as follows for the two biological replicates: Ef 63 (113, 117), Ef 64 (114, 118), ATCC 51299 (115, 119), and ATCC 29212 (116, 121). The labeled fractions were combined and subjected to strong cation exchange chromatography and desalting, followed by separation using liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS), and bioinformatics data analysis.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Experimental workflow for iTRAQ labeling and analysis: iTRAQ 8-plex labeling was performed for two sets of biological replicates of the strains Ef 63, Ef 64, ATCC 51299, and ATCC 29212. Each strain was labeled as follows for the two biological replicates: Ef 63 (113, 117), Ef 64 (114, 118), ATCC 51299 (115, 119), and ATCC 29212 (116, 121). The labeled fractions were combined and subjected to strong cation exchange chromatography and desalting, followed by separation using liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS), and bioinformatics data analysis.

    Techniques Used: Labeling, Chromatography, Liquid Chromatography, Mass Spectrometry, Liquid Chromatography with Mass Spectroscopy

    Determination of experimental variation for the identified proteins: (A) experimental variation of Ef 63 compared with ATCC 29212; (B) experimental variation of Ef 64 compared with ATCC 29212; (C) experimental variation of Ef 63 compared with ATCC 51299; and (D) experimental variation of Ef 64 compared with ATCC 51299. The horizontal axis represents % variation of iTRAQ ratios. The primary vertical axis represents the corresponding number of proteins (bars) having different % variation. The secondary vertical axis represents the cumulative % of the counted proteins. Variation against 88% coverage of population was considered as the cutoff value.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Determination of experimental variation for the identified proteins: (A) experimental variation of Ef 63 compared with ATCC 29212; (B) experimental variation of Ef 64 compared with ATCC 29212; (C) experimental variation of Ef 63 compared with ATCC 51299; and (D) experimental variation of Ef 64 compared with ATCC 51299. The horizontal axis represents % variation of iTRAQ ratios. The primary vertical axis represents the corresponding number of proteins (bars) having different % variation. The secondary vertical axis represents the cumulative % of the counted proteins. Variation against 88% coverage of population was considered as the cutoff value.

    Techniques Used:

    Volcano plots of differentially regulated proteins reveal significance patterns: (A) volcano plots of differentially regulated proteins of Ef 63 compared with ATCC 29212; (B) volcano plots of differentially regulated proteins of Ef 64 compared with ATCC 29212; (C) volcano plots of differentially regulated proteins of Ef 63 compared with ATCC 51299; and (D) volcano plots of differentially regulated proteins of Ef 64 compared with ATCC 51299. Threshold cutoffs determined for log2 fold change ratios are represented by green lines. p value cutoff of 0.05 is represented by a yellow line. Gray dots represent proteins that do not show significant differences in expression, yellow dots represent proteins that show significant differences in expression but within the cutoff log2 fold change ratios, and red dots represent proteins that show significant differences in expression outside the cut-off log2 fold change ratios.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Volcano plots of differentially regulated proteins reveal significance patterns: (A) volcano plots of differentially regulated proteins of Ef 63 compared with ATCC 29212; (B) volcano plots of differentially regulated proteins of Ef 64 compared with ATCC 29212; (C) volcano plots of differentially regulated proteins of Ef 63 compared with ATCC 51299; and (D) volcano plots of differentially regulated proteins of Ef 64 compared with ATCC 51299. Threshold cutoffs determined for log2 fold change ratios are represented by green lines. p value cutoff of 0.05 is represented by a yellow line. Gray dots represent proteins that do not show significant differences in expression, yellow dots represent proteins that show significant differences in expression but within the cutoff log2 fold change ratios, and red dots represent proteins that show significant differences in expression outside the cut-off log2 fold change ratios.

    Techniques Used: Expressing

    Functional classification of the significantly up-regulated proteins of  Ef 64  in comparison with both ATCC 29212 and 51299 strains meeting both p value cutoff and log 2 fold-change cutoff criteria
    Figure Legend Snippet: Functional classification of the significantly up-regulated proteins of Ef 64 in comparison with both ATCC 29212 and 51299 strains meeting both p value cutoff and log 2 fold-change cutoff criteria

    Techniques Used: Functional Assay

    Functional classification of the significantly down-regulated proteins of  Ef 64  in comparison with both ATCC 29212 and 51299 strains meeting both p value cutoff and log2-fold change cutoff criteria
    Figure Legend Snippet: Functional classification of the significantly down-regulated proteins of Ef 64 in comparison with both ATCC 29212 and 51299 strains meeting both p value cutoff and log2-fold change cutoff criteria

    Techniques Used: Functional Assay

    Gene ontology analysis of differentially regulated proteins reveals significantly affected pathways in Ef 63 and Ef 64: (A) biological processes, molecular functions, and cellular components that are significantly up-regulated in Ef 64 in comparison with ATCC 29212 and 51299 strains and (B) biological processes, molecular functions, and cellular components that are significantly down-regulated in Ef 63 in comparison with ATCC 29212 and 51299 strains.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Gene ontology analysis of differentially regulated proteins reveals significantly affected pathways in Ef 63 and Ef 64: (A) biological processes, molecular functions, and cellular components that are significantly up-regulated in Ef 64 in comparison with ATCC 29212 and 51299 strains and (B) biological processes, molecular functions, and cellular components that are significantly down-regulated in Ef 63 in comparison with ATCC 29212 and 51299 strains.

    Techniques Used:

    ef 64  (ATCC)


    Bioz Verified Symbol ATCC is a verified supplier
    Bioz Manufacturer Symbol ATCC manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 86

    Structured Review

    ATCC ef 64
    Experimental workflow for iTRAQ labeling and analysis: iTRAQ 8-plex labeling was performed for two sets of biological replicates of the strains Ef 63, Ef 64, ATCC 51299, and ATCC 29212. Each strain was labeled as follows for the two biological replicates: Ef 63 (113, 117), <t>Ef</t> <t>64</t> (114, 118), ATCC 51299 (115, 119), and ATCC 29212 (116, 121). The labeled fractions were combined and subjected to strong cation exchange chromatography and desalting, followed by separation using liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS), and bioinformatics data analysis.
    Ef 64, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/ef 64/product/ATCC
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
    ef 64 - by Bioz Stars, 2024-03
    86/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Quantitative Proteomics of Strong and Weak Biofilm Formers of Enterococcus faecalis Reveals Novel Regulators of Biofilm Formation * "

    Article Title: Quantitative Proteomics of Strong and Weak Biofilm Formers of Enterococcus faecalis Reveals Novel Regulators of Biofilm Formation *

    Journal: Molecular & Cellular Proteomics : MCP

    doi: 10.1074/mcp.RA117.000461

    Experimental workflow for iTRAQ labeling and analysis: iTRAQ 8-plex labeling was performed for two sets of biological replicates of the strains Ef 63, Ef 64, ATCC 51299, and ATCC 29212. Each strain was labeled as follows for the two biological replicates: Ef 63 (113, 117), Ef 64 (114, 118), ATCC 51299 (115, 119), and ATCC 29212 (116, 121). The labeled fractions were combined and subjected to strong cation exchange chromatography and desalting, followed by separation using liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS), and bioinformatics data analysis.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Experimental workflow for iTRAQ labeling and analysis: iTRAQ 8-plex labeling was performed for two sets of biological replicates of the strains Ef 63, Ef 64, ATCC 51299, and ATCC 29212. Each strain was labeled as follows for the two biological replicates: Ef 63 (113, 117), Ef 64 (114, 118), ATCC 51299 (115, 119), and ATCC 29212 (116, 121). The labeled fractions were combined and subjected to strong cation exchange chromatography and desalting, followed by separation using liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS), and bioinformatics data analysis.

    Techniques Used: Labeling, Chromatography, Liquid Chromatography, Mass Spectrometry, Liquid Chromatography with Mass Spectroscopy

    Determination of experimental variation for the identified proteins: (A) experimental variation of Ef 63 compared with ATCC 29212; (B) experimental variation of Ef 64 compared with ATCC 29212; (C) experimental variation of Ef 63 compared with ATCC 51299; and (D) experimental variation of Ef 64 compared with ATCC 51299. The horizontal axis represents % variation of iTRAQ ratios. The primary vertical axis represents the corresponding number of proteins (bars) having different % variation. The secondary vertical axis represents the cumulative % of the counted proteins. Variation against 88% coverage of population was considered as the cutoff value.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Determination of experimental variation for the identified proteins: (A) experimental variation of Ef 63 compared with ATCC 29212; (B) experimental variation of Ef 64 compared with ATCC 29212; (C) experimental variation of Ef 63 compared with ATCC 51299; and (D) experimental variation of Ef 64 compared with ATCC 51299. The horizontal axis represents % variation of iTRAQ ratios. The primary vertical axis represents the corresponding number of proteins (bars) having different % variation. The secondary vertical axis represents the cumulative % of the counted proteins. Variation against 88% coverage of population was considered as the cutoff value.

    Techniques Used:

    Volcano plots of differentially regulated proteins reveal significance patterns: (A) volcano plots of differentially regulated proteins of Ef 63 compared with ATCC 29212; (B) volcano plots of differentially regulated proteins of Ef 64 compared with ATCC 29212; (C) volcano plots of differentially regulated proteins of Ef 63 compared with ATCC 51299; and (D) volcano plots of differentially regulated proteins of Ef 64 compared with ATCC 51299. Threshold cutoffs determined for log2 fold change ratios are represented by green lines. p value cutoff of 0.05 is represented by a yellow line. Gray dots represent proteins that do not show significant differences in expression, yellow dots represent proteins that show significant differences in expression but within the cutoff log2 fold change ratios, and red dots represent proteins that show significant differences in expression outside the cut-off log2 fold change ratios.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Volcano plots of differentially regulated proteins reveal significance patterns: (A) volcano plots of differentially regulated proteins of Ef 63 compared with ATCC 29212; (B) volcano plots of differentially regulated proteins of Ef 64 compared with ATCC 29212; (C) volcano plots of differentially regulated proteins of Ef 63 compared with ATCC 51299; and (D) volcano plots of differentially regulated proteins of Ef 64 compared with ATCC 51299. Threshold cutoffs determined for log2 fold change ratios are represented by green lines. p value cutoff of 0.05 is represented by a yellow line. Gray dots represent proteins that do not show significant differences in expression, yellow dots represent proteins that show significant differences in expression but within the cutoff log2 fold change ratios, and red dots represent proteins that show significant differences in expression outside the cut-off log2 fold change ratios.

    Techniques Used: Expressing

    Functional classification of the significantly up-regulated proteins of  Ef 64  in comparison with both ATCC 29212 and 51299 strains meeting both p value cutoff and log 2 fold-change cutoff criteria
    Figure Legend Snippet: Functional classification of the significantly up-regulated proteins of Ef 64 in comparison with both ATCC 29212 and 51299 strains meeting both p value cutoff and log 2 fold-change cutoff criteria

    Techniques Used: Functional Assay

    Functional classification of the significantly down-regulated proteins of  Ef 64  in comparison with both ATCC 29212 and 51299 strains meeting both p value cutoff and log2-fold change cutoff criteria
    Figure Legend Snippet: Functional classification of the significantly down-regulated proteins of Ef 64 in comparison with both ATCC 29212 and 51299 strains meeting both p value cutoff and log2-fold change cutoff criteria

    Techniques Used: Functional Assay

    Gene ontology analysis of differentially regulated proteins reveals significantly affected pathways in Ef 63 and Ef 64: (A) biological processes, molecular functions, and cellular components that are significantly up-regulated in Ef 64 in comparison with ATCC 29212 and 51299 strains and (B) biological processes, molecular functions, and cellular components that are significantly down-regulated in Ef 63 in comparison with ATCC 29212 and 51299 strains.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Gene ontology analysis of differentially regulated proteins reveals significantly affected pathways in Ef 63 and Ef 64: (A) biological processes, molecular functions, and cellular components that are significantly up-regulated in Ef 64 in comparison with ATCC 29212 and 51299 strains and (B) biological processes, molecular functions, and cellular components that are significantly down-regulated in Ef 63 in comparison with ATCC 29212 and 51299 strains.

    Techniques Used:

    bordetella bronchiseptica atcc  (ATCC)


    Bioz Verified Symbol ATCC is a verified supplier
    Bioz Manufacturer Symbol ATCC manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 86

    Structured Review

    ATCC bordetella bronchiseptica atcc
    Bordetella Bronchiseptica Atcc, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/bordetella bronchiseptica atcc/product/ATCC
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
    bordetella bronchiseptica atcc - by Bioz Stars, 2024-03
    86/100 stars

    Images

    a2 6 95 7 0 36 cnsl 8 0  (ATCC)


    Bioz Verified Symbol ATCC is a verified supplier
    Bioz Manufacturer Symbol ATCC manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 86

    Structured Review

    ATCC a2 6 95 7 0 36 cnsl 8 0
    A2 6 95 7 0 36 Cnsl 8 0, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/a2 6 95 7 0 36 cnsl 8 0/product/ATCC
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
    a2 6 95 7 0 36 cnsl 8 0 - by Bioz Stars, 2024-03
    86/100 stars

    Images