e h spatial transcriptomics heterotypic cell network analysis shows colocalization (Spatial Transcriptomics Inc)

About

News

Press Release

Team

Advisors

Partners

Contact

Bioz Stars

Bioz vStars

Buy from Supplier

Structured Review

Spatial Transcriptomics Inc e h spatial transcriptomics heterotypic cell network analysis shows colocalization

STK24 is elevated in LUAD epithelial cells. A UMAP showing cell types after batch correction and dimensionality reduction clustering. B Bubble plot showing STK24 expression levels across various cell types. C Violin plot showing STK24 expression in normal and tumor cells across various cell types. D , E STK24 expression levels and regional variation analysis in spatial <t>transcriptomics.</t> F Violin plot showing STK24 expression in normal and tumor samples in the TCGA-LUAD cohort. G Immunohistochemistry results showing STK24 staining in LUAD and normal tissue samples from the HPA database. H Independent prognostic analysis to evaluate whether the association between STK24 and tumor survival is independent of traditional clinical variables. **** P < 0.0001, *** P < 0.001, ** P < 0.01, * P < 0.05, ns P > 0.05

E H Spatial Transcriptomics Heterotypic Cell Network Analysis Shows Colocalization, supplied by Spatial Transcriptomics Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/spatial+transcriptomics+based+analysis/pmc12574022-295-0-3?v=Spatial+Transcriptomics+Inc
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews

e h spatial transcriptomics heterotypic cell network analysis shows colocalization - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08

86/100 stars

Images

1) Product Images from "Genome-wide association, single-cell, and spatial transcriptomics analyses reveal the role of the STK24-expressing positive cells in LUAD progression and the tumor microenvironment, identifying STK24 as a potential therapeutic target"

Article Title: Genome-wide association, single-cell, and spatial transcriptomics analyses reveal the role of the STK24-expressing positive cells in LUAD progression and the tumor microenvironment, identifying STK24 as a potential therapeutic target

Journal: Journal of Translational Medicine

doi: 10.1186/s12967-025-07111-z

Figure Legend Snippet: STK24 is elevated in LUAD epithelial cells. A UMAP showing cell types after batch correction and dimensionality reduction clustering. B Bubble plot showing STK24 expression levels across various cell types. C Violin plot showing STK24 expression in normal and tumor cells across various cell types. D , E STK24 expression levels and regional variation analysis in spatial transcriptomics. F Violin plot showing STK24 expression in normal and tumor samples in the TCGA-LUAD cohort. G Immunohistochemistry results showing STK24 staining in LUAD and normal tissue samples from the HPA database. H Independent prognostic analysis to evaluate whether the association between STK24 and tumor survival is independent of traditional clinical variables. **** P < 0.0001, *** P < 0.001, ** P < 0.01, * P < 0.05, ns P > 0.05

Techniques Used: Expressing, Immunohistochemistry, Staining

Exploring the origins of STK24 Group cells through spatial transcriptomics (ST). A Schematic diagram of RCTD deconvolution and spatial trajectory analysis of spatial transcriptomics data. B – D Cell types after ST deconvolution. E , F Cell developmental trajectory and trajectory tree in ST ERS17014180. G , H Cell developmental trajectory and trajectory tree in ST ERS17014184. I , J Cell developmental trajectory and trajectory tree in ST ERS17014196. (K-M) Scatter plots showing the correlation between STK24 gene expression and developmental trajectory genes

Figure Legend Snippet: Exploring the origins of STK24 Group cells through spatial transcriptomics (ST). A Schematic diagram of RCTD deconvolution and spatial trajectory analysis of spatial transcriptomics data. B – D Cell types after ST deconvolution. E , F Cell developmental trajectory and trajectory tree in ST ERS17014180. G , H Cell developmental trajectory and trajectory tree in ST ERS17014184. I , J Cell developmental trajectory and trajectory tree in ST ERS17014196. (K-M) Scatter plots showing the correlation between STK24 gene expression and developmental trajectory genes

Techniques Used: Gene Expression

Interactions between STK24-positive tumor epithelial cells (STK24posEpi) and fibroblasts. A Analysis of interaction strength between STK24posEpi and various cell types. B Activated pathways in various cell communications. C Analysis of activated ligand-receptor pairs. D Schematic diagram of Heterotypic cellular network analysis and cell co-localization analysis of spatial tran-scriptomics data. E – H Spatial transcriptomics heterotypic cell network analysis shows colocalization of STK24posEpi and fibroblasts. I Heatmap displaying cell–cell dependency analysis in the colocated, neighboring, and extended neighboring (15-point) regions of the spatial transcriptomics data

Figure Legend Snippet: Interactions between STK24-positive tumor epithelial cells (STK24posEpi) and fibroblasts. A Analysis of interaction strength between STK24posEpi and various cell types. B Activated pathways in various cell communications. C Analysis of activated ligand-receptor pairs. D Schematic diagram of Heterotypic cellular network analysis and cell co-localization analysis of spatial tran-scriptomics data. E – H Spatial transcriptomics heterotypic cell network analysis shows colocalization of STK24posEpi and fibroblasts. I Heatmap displaying cell–cell dependency analysis in the colocated, neighboring, and extended neighboring (15-point) regions of the spatial transcriptomics data

Techniques Used:

Communication and signal flow changes between STK24posEpi and fibroblasts in spatial transcriptomics (ST). A Schematic diagram of Cell–cell communication analysis and signal flow direction analysis of spatial transcriptomics data. B Analysis of communication intensity between STK24posEpi and fibroblasts by integrating multiple spatial transcriptomics samples. C , D Communication between STK24posEpi and fibroblasts in the PDGF signaling pathway across different spatial transcriptomics samples. E Importance of Sender, Receiver, Mediator, and Influencer in different cell types in the PDGF signaling pathway. F , G Expression and co-expression of ligand-receptor pairs related to the PDGF signaling pathway in various spatial transcriptomics samples. H Importance of Sender, Receiver, Mediator, and Influencer in different cell types in the VEGF signaling pathway. I , J Communication between STK24posEpi and fibroblasts in the VEGF signaling pathway across different spatial transcriptomics samples. K Importance of Sender, Receiver, Mediator, and Influencer in different cell types in the MIF signaling pathway. L , M Communication between STK24posEpi and fibroblasts in the MIF signaling pathway across different spatial transcriptomics samples. N , O COMMOT analysis showing the direction of MIF signal flow and expression of Senders and Receivers in various spatial transcriptomics samples

Figure Legend Snippet: Communication and signal flow changes between STK24posEpi and fibroblasts in spatial transcriptomics (ST). A Schematic diagram of Cell–cell communication analysis and signal flow direction analysis of spatial transcriptomics data. B Analysis of communication intensity between STK24posEpi and fibroblasts by integrating multiple spatial transcriptomics samples. C , D Communication between STK24posEpi and fibroblasts in the PDGF signaling pathway across different spatial transcriptomics samples. E Importance of Sender, Receiver, Mediator, and Influencer in different cell types in the PDGF signaling pathway. F , G Expression and co-expression of ligand-receptor pairs related to the PDGF signaling pathway in various spatial transcriptomics samples. H Importance of Sender, Receiver, Mediator, and Influencer in different cell types in the VEGF signaling pathway. I , J Communication between STK24posEpi and fibroblasts in the VEGF signaling pathway across different spatial transcriptomics samples. K Importance of Sender, Receiver, Mediator, and Influencer in different cell types in the MIF signaling pathway. L , M Communication between STK24posEpi and fibroblasts in the MIF signaling pathway across different spatial transcriptomics samples. N , O COMMOT analysis showing the direction of MIF signal flow and expression of Senders and Receivers in various spatial transcriptomics samples

Techniques Used: Expressing

Exploration of apoptosis and STK24posEpi-related pathways in spatial transcriptomics (ST). A Schematic diagram of Pathway dependency analysis of spatial transcriptomics data. B Enrichment results for the ST apoptosis pathway and comparison of differences between regions. C Heatmap displaying apoptosis-dependent cell pathways within regions in the spatial context. D , F Network diagrams showing apoptosis-dependent cell pathways in intra ( D ), juxta_5 ( E ), and para_15 ( F ) regions. G Enrichment results for the ST cell proliferation pathway and comparison of differences between the STK24 Group. H Enrichment results for the ST cell damage pathway and comparison of differences between the STK24 Group. I Comparison of ST cell cycle and DNA repair pathways between the STK24 Groups. J , K Heatmaps showing cell pathway dependency analysis for different cell types within the intra ( J ) and para_15 ( K ) regions in the spatial context. **** P < 0.0001, *** P < 0.001, ** P < 0.01, * P < 0.05, ns P > 0.05

Figure Legend Snippet: Exploration of apoptosis and STK24posEpi-related pathways in spatial transcriptomics (ST). A Schematic diagram of Pathway dependency analysis of spatial transcriptomics data. B Enrichment results for the ST apoptosis pathway and comparison of differences between regions. C Heatmap displaying apoptosis-dependent cell pathways within regions in the spatial context. D , F Network diagrams showing apoptosis-dependent cell pathways in intra ( D ), juxta_5 ( E ), and para_15 ( F ) regions. G Enrichment results for the ST cell proliferation pathway and comparison of differences between the STK24 Group. H Enrichment results for the ST cell damage pathway and comparison of differences between the STK24 Group. I Comparison of ST cell cycle and DNA repair pathways between the STK24 Groups. J , K Heatmaps showing cell pathway dependency analysis for different cell types within the intra ( J ) and para_15 ( K ) regions in the spatial context. **** P < 0.0001, *** P < 0.001, ** P < 0.01, * P < 0.05, ns P > 0.05

Techniques Used: Comparison

Clinical significance of STK24posEpi. A Schematic diagram of Homotypic cellular network analysis of spatial transcriptomics data. B Homotypic cell network analysis of STK24posEpi in spatial transcriptomics. C Survival analysis of STK24posEpi across multiple bulk transcriptome cohorts after Bayesian deconvolution. D Comparison of tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte scores between STK24posEpi Groups in the TCGA-LUAD cohort. E Histological slides showing differences in tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes between STK24posEpi Groups in the TCGA-LUAD cohort. F Correlation analysis of STK24posEpi and B cells in multiple bulk transcriptomes. G Differential expression of BCR signaling pathway-related genes between STK24posEpi Groups in the TCGA-LUAD cohort. H Differential expression of antigen processing and presentation pathway-related genes between STK24posEpi Groups in the TCGA-LUAD cohort. I Comparison of clinical factors between STK24posEpi Groups in the TCGA-LUAD cohort. **** P < 0.0001, *** P < 0.001, ** P < 0.01, * P < 0.05, ns P > 0.05

Figure Legend Snippet: Clinical significance of STK24posEpi. A Schematic diagram of Homotypic cellular network analysis of spatial transcriptomics data. B Homotypic cell network analysis of STK24posEpi in spatial transcriptomics. C Survival analysis of STK24posEpi across multiple bulk transcriptome cohorts after Bayesian deconvolution. D Comparison of tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte scores between STK24posEpi Groups in the TCGA-LUAD cohort. E Histological slides showing differences in tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes between STK24posEpi Groups in the TCGA-LUAD cohort. F Correlation analysis of STK24posEpi and B cells in multiple bulk transcriptomes. G Differential expression of BCR signaling pathway-related genes between STK24posEpi Groups in the TCGA-LUAD cohort. H Differential expression of antigen processing and presentation pathway-related genes between STK24posEpi Groups in the TCGA-LUAD cohort. I Comparison of clinical factors between STK24posEpi Groups in the TCGA-LUAD cohort. **** P < 0.0001, *** P < 0.001, ** P < 0.01, * P < 0.05, ns P > 0.05

Techniques Used: Comparison, Quantitative Proteomics

Review

e h spatial transcriptomics heterotypic cell network analysis shows colocalization (Spatial Transcriptomics Inc)

Structured Review

Images

1) Product Images from "Genome-wide association, single-cell, and spatial transcriptomics analyses reveal the role of the STK24-expressing positive cells in LUAD progression and the tumor microenvironment, identifying STK24 as a potential therapeutic target"

Similar Products

Image Search Results