physical function (pf) scales (ProMIS Neurosciences)

About

News

Press Release

Team

Advisors

Partners

Contact

Bioz Stars

Bioz vStars

Buy from Supplier

Structured Review

ProMIS Neurosciences physical function (pf) scales
Physical Function (Pf) Scales, supplied by ProMIS Neurosciences, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/physical+functioning+scale/physical+function++pf++scales/pm30218641-39-1-1
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews

physical function (pf) scales - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10

90/100 stars

Images

other:

Article Title: Do Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Scales Demonstrate Responsiveness as Well as Disease-Specific Scales in Patients Undergoing Knee Arthroscopy?
Article Snippet: The ability to measure generic health domains informs clinicians of how procedures like knee arthroscopy are influencing overall health rather than only focal disease-specific effects.16 Further, because PROMIS scales use computer adaptive test (CAT) algorithms, they take less time than most disease-specific scales.14,15,27 For example, previously published data have determined that the CAT for the PROMIS Physical Function (PF) scale is administered in 6 to 12 questions per patient and the IKDC consists of 18 static questions with an average completion time of 85 seconds and 195 seconds, respectively.27 The purpose of this study was to determine whether the PROMIS scales are responsive and able to detect meaningful clinical change similarly to disease-specific scales (IKDC and KOOS) across the continuum of care from 2 weeks to 12 months in patients who underwent knee arthroscopy.

Article Title: The PROMIS physical function scale
Article Snippet: Objective: To evaluate the performance of the Patient Reported OutcomesMeasurement Information System (PROMIS) physical function (PF) scale compared to the validated Stroke Impact Scale–16 (SIS-16) in ischemic stroke patients seen in an ambulatory cerebrovascular clinic.. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study.. PROMIS PF (computer adaptive testing version) and SIS-16 measures were electronically collected on 1,946 ischemic stroke patients seen in a cerebrovascular clinic using an electronic platform from September 12, 2012, to June 16, 2015.

Article Title: Ability of Patient-Reported Outcomes to Characterize Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) After Attending a Primary Care Physical Therapist and Medical Doctor Collaborative Service: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article Snippet: The PROMIS physical function (PF) and pain interference (PI) scales have demonstrated validity for tracking patients with musculoskeletal problems.4,5,8,9 Self-efficacy (SE), the concept of the ability to act on one’s own behalf, is a positive behavioral health attribute habilitation Medicine associated with health outcomes.10 Because individuals ultimately will self-manage their musculoskeletal problems,11 understanding a patients’ confidence in managing their symptoms may influence provider decisions of how much and what kind of support is needed.

Article Title: Construction of the Eight Item PROMIS Pediatric Physical Function Scales: Built Using Item Response Theory
Article Snippet: We describe the development of PROMIS physical function (PF) scales for pediatrics.

Article Title: Determining Success or Failure After Foot and Ankle Surgery Using Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) and Patient Reported Outcome Information System (PROMIS).
Article Snippet: The use of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) is rapidly increasing in foot and ankle surgery as health care evolves to value-based care models.1,11,20 Generic health metrics like the Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Instrumentation System (PROMIS) are appealing given their applicability across many medical conditions, allowing a common measurement metric to be followed throughout a medical system.2,3 In support of this approach, recent head-to-head Keywords: PROMIS, PASS scores, PRO, patient-reported outcomes psychometric comparisons of generic PROMIS scales outperformed disease-specific legacy measures, leading some authors to call for a paradigm shift in orthopaedics to scales like PROMIS.9,10,12 Proof in concept has been published, documenting the widespread adoption of computer adaptive testing (CAT) PROMIS physical function (PF), pain interference (PI), and depression (D) scales across a medical system with an 80% patient completion rate.1 Although the validity of PROMIS scales for foot and ankle surgery has been demonstrated and high patient completion rates are possible, further study is needed to better understand how PROMIS scales can be successfully applied to clinical decision making.8 Current research has used a change in PROMIS t scores over an episode of care to determine a positive outcome rather than concrete benchmarks of success.8,18 Although clinically meaningful change is important to determine when patients are improving, it does not mark when patients will feel at an acceptable level of symptoms and activity or when they are likely to consider their surgery a success.

Article Title: How Are Age, Gender, and Country Differences Associated With PROMIS Physical Function, Upper Extremity, and Pain Interference Scores?
Article Snippet: Currently, no patient-specific reference data exist for the Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function (PF), Upper Extremity (UE), and Pain Interference (PI) scales for individuals 50 years and older.

Review

physical function (pf) scales (ProMIS Neurosciences)

Structured Review

Images

Related Articles

other:

Similar Products

Image Search Results