Review



browser container  (ActivX Inc)

 
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
    • 90
      Buy from Supplier

    Structured Review

    ActivX Inc browser container
    Browser Container, supplied by ActivX Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/java+or+activex+software+components/browser+container/us09753704-69-7-17
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    browser container - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    90/100 stars

    Images

    Related Articles

    Software:

    Article Title: Web-based scan-task enabled system and method of and apparatus for developing and deploying the same on a client-server network
    Article Snippet: As shown in FIG. 1B, each mobile client system 6 in the web-based mobile scanner-driven computing system/network 11 comprises a hardware platform comprising one or more CPUs, memory architecture, and I/O network interfaces, integrated bar code symbol scanner 11 (e.g. realized as an integrated laser scanning bar code symbol reading module, or as integrated digital imaging based bar code symbol reading device), and/or RFID tag reader/writer (collectively “identification code reader”), and running an operating system (OS) and enterprise-level application computer software (i.e. classes and frameworks) supporting three main software modules supported on the hardware platform. .. The client software modules include: (i) a browser container (i.e. a native application or implemented as an ActiveX control in the web page) 9 containing an embedded web browser (e.g. any modern browser 9A like Safari, IE, or Firefox etc.) to display web pages; and functional modules, namely: (ii) a task decoder 10A for handling task related works such as requesting task from server, and decoding task according to the scan task specification; and (iii) a scan driver (e.g. library) 10B for driving the scanning hardware, handling the scan request, acquiring the scanned ID (i.e. code data), and returning scanned code data (e.g. scanned ID) to the mobile device. ..

    Control:

    Article Title: Web-based scan-task enabled system and method of and apparatus for developing and deploying the same on a client-server network
    Article Snippet: As shown in FIG. 1B, each mobile client system 6 in the web-based mobile scanner-driven computing system/network 11 comprises a hardware platform comprising one or more CPUs, memory architecture, and I/O network interfaces, integrated bar code symbol scanner 11 (e.g. realized as an integrated laser scanning bar code symbol reading module, or as integrated digital imaging based bar code symbol reading device), and/or RFID tag reader/writer (collectively “identification code reader”), and running an operating system (OS) and enterprise-level application computer software (i.e. classes and frameworks) supporting three main software modules supported on the hardware platform. .. The client software modules include: (i) a browser container (i.e. a native application or implemented as an ActiveX control in the web page) 9 containing an embedded web browser (e.g. any modern browser 9A like Safari, IE, or Firefox etc.) to display web pages; and functional modules, namely: (ii) a task decoder 10A for handling task related works such as requesting task from server, and decoding task according to the scan task specification; and (iii) a scan driver (e.g. library) 10B for driving the scanning hardware, handling the scan request, acquiring the scanned ID (i.e. code data), and returning scanned code data (e.g. scanned ID) to the mobile device. ..

    Functional Assay:

    Article Title: Web-based scan-task enabled system and method of and apparatus for developing and deploying the same on a client-server network
    Article Snippet: As shown in FIG. 1B, each mobile client system 6 in the web-based mobile scanner-driven computing system/network 11 comprises a hardware platform comprising one or more CPUs, memory architecture, and I/O network interfaces, integrated bar code symbol scanner 11 (e.g. realized as an integrated laser scanning bar code symbol reading module, or as integrated digital imaging based bar code symbol reading device), and/or RFID tag reader/writer (collectively “identification code reader”), and running an operating system (OS) and enterprise-level application computer software (i.e. classes and frameworks) supporting three main software modules supported on the hardware platform. .. The client software modules include: (i) a browser container (i.e. a native application or implemented as an ActiveX control in the web page) 9 containing an embedded web browser (e.g. any modern browser 9A like Safari, IE, or Firefox etc.) to display web pages; and functional modules, namely: (ii) a task decoder 10A for handling task related works such as requesting task from server, and decoding task according to the scan task specification; and (iii) a scan driver (e.g. library) 10B for driving the scanning hardware, handling the scan request, acquiring the scanned ID (i.e. code data), and returning scanned code data (e.g. scanned ID) to the mobile device. ..



    Similar Products

    oracle java cloud service jcs  (Oracle Corporation)
    86
    Oracle Corporation oracle java cloud service jcs
    Oracle Java Cloud Service Jcs, supplied by Oracle Corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/java+or+activex+software+components/120+asset+cloud+device+digital+implements+management+oracle+service+system+utilities+%E2%80%9Cdacs/us12657208-430-16-6
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    oracle java cloud service jcs - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    86/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    enterprise java beans  (Oracle Corporation)
    86
    Oracle Corporation enterprise java beans
    Enterprise Java Beans, supplied by Oracle Corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/java+or+activex+software+components/beans+enterprise+java/us12620123-208-17-22
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    enterprise java beans - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    86/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    prodia stemcell indonesia  (Prodia Laboratories)
    86
    Prodia Laboratories prodia stemcell indonesia
    Prodia Stemcell Indonesia, supplied by Prodia Laboratories, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/java+or+activex+software+components/indonesia+prodia+stemcell/pmc13166702-166-0-0
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    prodia stemcell indonesia - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    86/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    ha recombinant protein of a indonesia 5 2005  (Novoprotein)
    86
    Novoprotein ha recombinant protein of a indonesia 5 2005
    Comparison of vaccine efficacy between H5 Texas Mut vaccine and H5 Ast20 Mut vaccine in mice (A) Schematic of cleavage-defective mutant (Mut) HA mRNA vaccines. (B) Western blotting analysis of HA protein expression in transfected BHK-21 cells. Cells were transfected with varying doses (50, 100, 200, and 500 ng/μL) of Texas Mut or Ast20 Mut mRNA. (C) Mice were vaccinated (i.m.) with 1 or 5 μg Texas/Ast20 mRNA-LNP (SM102) encoding Mut HA or placebo using in a prime-boost schedule with an interval of 4 weeks. Blood samples ( n = 8) were collected from mice 2 weeks after prime and boost. Binding IgG of serum, reactive to the Texas HA protein, was measured by ELISA. Titers of placebo group were below detection limit. (D) 50% neutralization titers of pseudotyped virus (A/Texas/37/2024) in serum collected 2 weeks post-boost (week 6). Titers of placebo group were below detection limit. (E and F) Binding IgG of 1 μg Texas vaccine group (E) and Ast20 vaccine group (F) was measured by ELISA, reactive to the HA of clade 1 virus (A/Viet Nam/1203/2004), clade 2.1.3.2 virus <t>(A/Indonesia/5/2005),</t> clade 2.2 virus (A/bar-headed goose/Qinghai/5/2005), clade 2.3.2.1a virus (A/Hubei/1/2010), clade 2.3.4 virus (A/Anhui/1/2005), clade 2.3.4.4b virus (A/Astrakhan/3212/2020), and clade 2.3.4.4b virus (A/Texas/37/2024). (G) Radar chart of broad-binding IgG levels elicited by 1 μg Texas vaccine and Ast20 vaccine. (H) Vaccination schedule. Mice were vaccinated (i.m.) with 1 or 5 μg mRNA-LNP (SM102) encoding Texas HA-Mut, Ast20 HA-Mut, or placebo. Four weeks post-vaccination (week 4), mice were challenged with 50 × LD 50 of A/ostrich/China/HB/2024. Virus load of organs in vaccinated mice 1, 3, 5 days post-infection determined using plaque assays on MDCK cells. (I–L) Virus load of lung (I), heart (J), kidney (K), and brain (L). The dashed horizontal line indicates the assay limit of detection. Data are presented as the mean ± SD; p values are analyzed with t test (∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001) (C–L). ∗/∗∗∗ (E and F) indicates significant differences between other HA proteins and Texas (E) or Ast20 (F) protein. ∗ (E and F) indicates significant differences between other HA proteins and Texas (E) or Ast20 (F) protein. ∗ (I–L) indicates significant differences between placebo and vaccination groups in the same day.
    Ha Recombinant Protein Of A Indonesia 5 2005, supplied by Novoprotein, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/java+or+activex+software+components/2005+5+a+bar+goose+ha+headed+of+protein+qinghai+recombinant/pmc13130686-29-0-8
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    ha recombinant protein of a indonesia 5 2005 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    86/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    jurnal insan farmasi indonesia  (Insan Bamboo Salt)
    86
    Insan Bamboo Salt jurnal insan farmasi indonesia
    Comparison of vaccine efficacy between H5 Texas Mut vaccine and H5 Ast20 Mut vaccine in mice (A) Schematic of cleavage-defective mutant (Mut) HA mRNA vaccines. (B) Western blotting analysis of HA protein expression in transfected BHK-21 cells. Cells were transfected with varying doses (50, 100, 200, and 500 ng/μL) of Texas Mut or Ast20 Mut mRNA. (C) Mice were vaccinated (i.m.) with 1 or 5 μg Texas/Ast20 mRNA-LNP (SM102) encoding Mut HA or placebo using in a prime-boost schedule with an interval of 4 weeks. Blood samples ( n = 8) were collected from mice 2 weeks after prime and boost. Binding IgG of serum, reactive to the Texas HA protein, was measured by ELISA. Titers of placebo group were below detection limit. (D) 50% neutralization titers of pseudotyped virus (A/Texas/37/2024) in serum collected 2 weeks post-boost (week 6). Titers of placebo group were below detection limit. (E and F) Binding IgG of 1 μg Texas vaccine group (E) and Ast20 vaccine group (F) was measured by ELISA, reactive to the HA of clade 1 virus (A/Viet Nam/1203/2004), clade 2.1.3.2 virus <t>(A/Indonesia/5/2005),</t> clade 2.2 virus (A/bar-headed goose/Qinghai/5/2005), clade 2.3.2.1a virus (A/Hubei/1/2010), clade 2.3.4 virus (A/Anhui/1/2005), clade 2.3.4.4b virus (A/Astrakhan/3212/2020), and clade 2.3.4.4b virus (A/Texas/37/2024). (G) Radar chart of broad-binding IgG levels elicited by 1 μg Texas vaccine and Ast20 vaccine. (H) Vaccination schedule. Mice were vaccinated (i.m.) with 1 or 5 μg mRNA-LNP (SM102) encoding Texas HA-Mut, Ast20 HA-Mut, or placebo. Four weeks post-vaccination (week 4), mice were challenged with 50 × LD 50 of A/ostrich/China/HB/2024. Virus load of organs in vaccinated mice 1, 3, 5 days post-infection determined using plaque assays on MDCK cells. (I–L) Virus load of lung (I), heart (J), kidney (K), and brain (L). The dashed horizontal line indicates the assay limit of detection. Data are presented as the mean ± SD; p values are analyzed with t test (∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001) (C–L). ∗/∗∗∗ (E and F) indicates significant differences between other HA proteins and Texas (E) or Ast20 (F) protein. ∗ (E and F) indicates significant differences between other HA proteins and Texas (E) or Ast20 (F) protein. ∗ (I–L) indicates significant differences between placebo and vaccination groups in the same day.
    Jurnal Insan Farmasi Indonesia, supplied by Insan Bamboo Salt, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/java+or+activex+software+components/farmasi+indonesia+insan+jurnal/10__55262_slash_fabadeczacilik__1752400-299-0-1
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    jurnal insan farmasi indonesia - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    86/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    statistik indonesia  (Statistik Georg Ferber)
    86
    Statistik Georg Ferber statistik indonesia
    Comparison of vaccine efficacy between H5 Texas Mut vaccine and H5 Ast20 Mut vaccine in mice (A) Schematic of cleavage-defective mutant (Mut) HA mRNA vaccines. (B) Western blotting analysis of HA protein expression in transfected BHK-21 cells. Cells were transfected with varying doses (50, 100, 200, and 500 ng/μL) of Texas Mut or Ast20 Mut mRNA. (C) Mice were vaccinated (i.m.) with 1 or 5 μg Texas/Ast20 mRNA-LNP (SM102) encoding Mut HA or placebo using in a prime-boost schedule with an interval of 4 weeks. Blood samples ( n = 8) were collected from mice 2 weeks after prime and boost. Binding IgG of serum, reactive to the Texas HA protein, was measured by ELISA. Titers of placebo group were below detection limit. (D) 50% neutralization titers of pseudotyped virus (A/Texas/37/2024) in serum collected 2 weeks post-boost (week 6). Titers of placebo group were below detection limit. (E and F) Binding IgG of 1 μg Texas vaccine group (E) and Ast20 vaccine group (F) was measured by ELISA, reactive to the HA of clade 1 virus (A/Viet Nam/1203/2004), clade 2.1.3.2 virus <t>(A/Indonesia/5/2005),</t> clade 2.2 virus (A/bar-headed goose/Qinghai/5/2005), clade 2.3.2.1a virus (A/Hubei/1/2010), clade 2.3.4 virus (A/Anhui/1/2005), clade 2.3.4.4b virus (A/Astrakhan/3212/2020), and clade 2.3.4.4b virus (A/Texas/37/2024). (G) Radar chart of broad-binding IgG levels elicited by 1 μg Texas vaccine and Ast20 vaccine. (H) Vaccination schedule. Mice were vaccinated (i.m.) with 1 or 5 μg mRNA-LNP (SM102) encoding Texas HA-Mut, Ast20 HA-Mut, or placebo. Four weeks post-vaccination (week 4), mice were challenged with 50 × LD 50 of A/ostrich/China/HB/2024. Virus load of organs in vaccinated mice 1, 3, 5 days post-infection determined using plaque assays on MDCK cells. (I–L) Virus load of lung (I), heart (J), kidney (K), and brain (L). The dashed horizontal line indicates the assay limit of detection. Data are presented as the mean ± SD; p values are analyzed with t test (∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001) (C–L). ∗/∗∗∗ (E and F) indicates significant differences between other HA proteins and Texas (E) or Ast20 (F) protein. ∗ (E and F) indicates significant differences between other HA proteins and Texas (E) or Ast20 (F) protein. ∗ (I–L) indicates significant differences between placebo and vaccination groups in the same day.
    Statistik Indonesia, supplied by Statistik Georg Ferber, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/java+or+activex+software+components/indonesia+statistik/pm41906164-559-3-3
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    statistik indonesia - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    86/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    statistik indonesia 2023  (Statistik Georg Ferber)
    86
    Statistik Georg Ferber statistik indonesia 2023
    Comparison of vaccine efficacy between H5 Texas Mut vaccine and H5 Ast20 Mut vaccine in mice (A) Schematic of cleavage-defective mutant (Mut) HA mRNA vaccines. (B) Western blotting analysis of HA protein expression in transfected BHK-21 cells. Cells were transfected with varying doses (50, 100, 200, and 500 ng/μL) of Texas Mut or Ast20 Mut mRNA. (C) Mice were vaccinated (i.m.) with 1 or 5 μg Texas/Ast20 mRNA-LNP (SM102) encoding Mut HA or placebo using in a prime-boost schedule with an interval of 4 weeks. Blood samples ( n = 8) were collected from mice 2 weeks after prime and boost. Binding IgG of serum, reactive to the Texas HA protein, was measured by ELISA. Titers of placebo group were below detection limit. (D) 50% neutralization titers of pseudotyped virus (A/Texas/37/2024) in serum collected 2 weeks post-boost (week 6). Titers of placebo group were below detection limit. (E and F) Binding IgG of 1 μg Texas vaccine group (E) and Ast20 vaccine group (F) was measured by ELISA, reactive to the HA of clade 1 virus (A/Viet Nam/1203/2004), clade 2.1.3.2 virus <t>(A/Indonesia/5/2005),</t> clade 2.2 virus (A/bar-headed goose/Qinghai/5/2005), clade 2.3.2.1a virus (A/Hubei/1/2010), clade 2.3.4 virus (A/Anhui/1/2005), clade 2.3.4.4b virus (A/Astrakhan/3212/2020), and clade 2.3.4.4b virus (A/Texas/37/2024). (G) Radar chart of broad-binding IgG levels elicited by 1 μg Texas vaccine and Ast20 vaccine. (H) Vaccination schedule. Mice were vaccinated (i.m.) with 1 or 5 μg mRNA-LNP (SM102) encoding Texas HA-Mut, Ast20 HA-Mut, or placebo. Four weeks post-vaccination (week 4), mice were challenged with 50 × LD 50 of A/ostrich/China/HB/2024. Virus load of organs in vaccinated mice 1, 3, 5 days post-infection determined using plaque assays on MDCK cells. (I–L) Virus load of lung (I), heart (J), kidney (K), and brain (L). The dashed horizontal line indicates the assay limit of detection. Data are presented as the mean ± SD; p values are analyzed with t test (∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001) (C–L). ∗/∗∗∗ (E and F) indicates significant differences between other HA proteins and Texas (E) or Ast20 (F) protein. ∗ (E and F) indicates significant differences between other HA proteins and Texas (E) or Ast20 (F) protein. ∗ (I–L) indicates significant differences between placebo and vaccination groups in the same day.
    Statistik Indonesia 2023, supplied by Statistik Georg Ferber, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/java+or+activex+software+components/2023+indonesia+statistik/pm41906164-420-0-0
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    statistik indonesia 2023 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    86/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    statistik indonesia 2024  (Statistik Georg Ferber)
    86
    Statistik Georg Ferber statistik indonesia 2024
    Comparison of vaccine efficacy between H5 Texas Mut vaccine and H5 Ast20 Mut vaccine in mice (A) Schematic of cleavage-defective mutant (Mut) HA mRNA vaccines. (B) Western blotting analysis of HA protein expression in transfected BHK-21 cells. Cells were transfected with varying doses (50, 100, 200, and 500 ng/μL) of Texas Mut or Ast20 Mut mRNA. (C) Mice were vaccinated (i.m.) with 1 or 5 μg Texas/Ast20 mRNA-LNP (SM102) encoding Mut HA or placebo using in a prime-boost schedule with an interval of 4 weeks. Blood samples ( n = 8) were collected from mice 2 weeks after prime and boost. Binding IgG of serum, reactive to the Texas HA protein, was measured by ELISA. Titers of placebo group were below detection limit. (D) 50% neutralization titers of pseudotyped virus (A/Texas/37/2024) in serum collected 2 weeks post-boost (week 6). Titers of placebo group were below detection limit. (E and F) Binding IgG of 1 μg Texas vaccine group (E) and Ast20 vaccine group (F) was measured by ELISA, reactive to the HA of clade 1 virus (A/Viet Nam/1203/2004), clade 2.1.3.2 virus <t>(A/Indonesia/5/2005),</t> clade 2.2 virus (A/bar-headed goose/Qinghai/5/2005), clade 2.3.2.1a virus (A/Hubei/1/2010), clade 2.3.4 virus (A/Anhui/1/2005), clade 2.3.4.4b virus (A/Astrakhan/3212/2020), and clade 2.3.4.4b virus (A/Texas/37/2024). (G) Radar chart of broad-binding IgG levels elicited by 1 μg Texas vaccine and Ast20 vaccine. (H) Vaccination schedule. Mice were vaccinated (i.m.) with 1 or 5 μg mRNA-LNP (SM102) encoding Texas HA-Mut, Ast20 HA-Mut, or placebo. Four weeks post-vaccination (week 4), mice were challenged with 50 × LD 50 of A/ostrich/China/HB/2024. Virus load of organs in vaccinated mice 1, 3, 5 days post-infection determined using plaque assays on MDCK cells. (I–L) Virus load of lung (I), heart (J), kidney (K), and brain (L). The dashed horizontal line indicates the assay limit of detection. Data are presented as the mean ± SD; p values are analyzed with t test (∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001) (C–L). ∗/∗∗∗ (E and F) indicates significant differences between other HA proteins and Texas (E) or Ast20 (F) protein. ∗ (E and F) indicates significant differences between other HA proteins and Texas (E) or Ast20 (F) protein. ∗ (I–L) indicates significant differences between placebo and vaccination groups in the same day.
    Statistik Indonesia 2024, supplied by Statistik Georg Ferber, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/java+or+activex+software+components/2023+indonesia+statistik/10__64118_slash_aj__v3i1__71-129-0-0
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    statistik indonesia 2024 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    86/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    cerita data statistik untuk indonesia  (Statistik Georg Ferber)
    86
    Statistik Georg Ferber cerita data statistik untuk indonesia
    Comparison of vaccine efficacy between H5 Texas Mut vaccine and H5 Ast20 Mut vaccine in mice (A) Schematic of cleavage-defective mutant (Mut) HA mRNA vaccines. (B) Western blotting analysis of HA protein expression in transfected BHK-21 cells. Cells were transfected with varying doses (50, 100, 200, and 500 ng/μL) of Texas Mut or Ast20 Mut mRNA. (C) Mice were vaccinated (i.m.) with 1 or 5 μg Texas/Ast20 mRNA-LNP (SM102) encoding Mut HA or placebo using in a prime-boost schedule with an interval of 4 weeks. Blood samples ( n = 8) were collected from mice 2 weeks after prime and boost. Binding IgG of serum, reactive to the Texas HA protein, was measured by ELISA. Titers of placebo group were below detection limit. (D) 50% neutralization titers of pseudotyped virus (A/Texas/37/2024) in serum collected 2 weeks post-boost (week 6). Titers of placebo group were below detection limit. (E and F) Binding IgG of 1 μg Texas vaccine group (E) and Ast20 vaccine group (F) was measured by ELISA, reactive to the HA of clade 1 virus (A/Viet Nam/1203/2004), clade 2.1.3.2 virus <t>(A/Indonesia/5/2005),</t> clade 2.2 virus (A/bar-headed goose/Qinghai/5/2005), clade 2.3.2.1a virus (A/Hubei/1/2010), clade 2.3.4 virus (A/Anhui/1/2005), clade 2.3.4.4b virus (A/Astrakhan/3212/2020), and clade 2.3.4.4b virus (A/Texas/37/2024). (G) Radar chart of broad-binding IgG levels elicited by 1 μg Texas vaccine and Ast20 vaccine. (H) Vaccination schedule. Mice were vaccinated (i.m.) with 1 or 5 μg mRNA-LNP (SM102) encoding Texas HA-Mut, Ast20 HA-Mut, or placebo. Four weeks post-vaccination (week 4), mice were challenged with 50 × LD 50 of A/ostrich/China/HB/2024. Virus load of organs in vaccinated mice 1, 3, 5 days post-infection determined using plaque assays on MDCK cells. (I–L) Virus load of lung (I), heart (J), kidney (K), and brain (L). The dashed horizontal line indicates the assay limit of detection. Data are presented as the mean ± SD; p values are analyzed with t test (∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001) (C–L). ∗/∗∗∗ (E and F) indicates significant differences between other HA proteins and Texas (E) or Ast20 (F) protein. ∗ (E and F) indicates significant differences between other HA proteins and Texas (E) or Ast20 (F) protein. ∗ (I–L) indicates significant differences between placebo and vaccination groups in the same day.
    Cerita Data Statistik Untuk Indonesia, supplied by Statistik Georg Ferber, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/java+or+activex+software+components/atau+berdistribusi+berdistribusi+data+data+digunakan+diketahui+hipotesis+maka+menguji+normal+normal+setelah+tersebut+tidak+untuk/10__57178_slash_paradoks__v9i1__2158-338-0-2
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    cerita data statistik untuk indonesia - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    86/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Comparison of vaccine efficacy between H5 Texas Mut vaccine and H5 Ast20 Mut vaccine in mice (A) Schematic of cleavage-defective mutant (Mut) HA mRNA vaccines. (B) Western blotting analysis of HA protein expression in transfected BHK-21 cells. Cells were transfected with varying doses (50, 100, 200, and 500 ng/μL) of Texas Mut or Ast20 Mut mRNA. (C) Mice were vaccinated (i.m.) with 1 or 5 μg Texas/Ast20 mRNA-LNP (SM102) encoding Mut HA or placebo using in a prime-boost schedule with an interval of 4 weeks. Blood samples ( n = 8) were collected from mice 2 weeks after prime and boost. Binding IgG of serum, reactive to the Texas HA protein, was measured by ELISA. Titers of placebo group were below detection limit. (D) 50% neutralization titers of pseudotyped virus (A/Texas/37/2024) in serum collected 2 weeks post-boost (week 6). Titers of placebo group were below detection limit. (E and F) Binding IgG of 1 μg Texas vaccine group (E) and Ast20 vaccine group (F) was measured by ELISA, reactive to the HA of clade 1 virus (A/Viet Nam/1203/2004), clade 2.1.3.2 virus (A/Indonesia/5/2005), clade 2.2 virus (A/bar-headed goose/Qinghai/5/2005), clade 2.3.2.1a virus (A/Hubei/1/2010), clade 2.3.4 virus (A/Anhui/1/2005), clade 2.3.4.4b virus (A/Astrakhan/3212/2020), and clade 2.3.4.4b virus (A/Texas/37/2024). (G) Radar chart of broad-binding IgG levels elicited by 1 μg Texas vaccine and Ast20 vaccine. (H) Vaccination schedule. Mice were vaccinated (i.m.) with 1 or 5 μg mRNA-LNP (SM102) encoding Texas HA-Mut, Ast20 HA-Mut, or placebo. Four weeks post-vaccination (week 4), mice were challenged with 50 × LD 50 of A/ostrich/China/HB/2024. Virus load of organs in vaccinated mice 1, 3, 5 days post-infection determined using plaque assays on MDCK cells. (I–L) Virus load of lung (I), heart (J), kidney (K), and brain (L). The dashed horizontal line indicates the assay limit of detection. Data are presented as the mean ± SD; p values are analyzed with t test (∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001) (C–L). ∗/∗∗∗ (E and F) indicates significant differences between other HA proteins and Texas (E) or Ast20 (F) protein. ∗ (E and F) indicates significant differences between other HA proteins and Texas (E) or Ast20 (F) protein. ∗ (I–L) indicates significant differences between placebo and vaccination groups in the same day.

    Journal: Cell Reports Medicine

    Article Title: Preclinical evaluation of an mRNA vaccine developed from the first human isolate of bovine H5N1

    doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2026.102702

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Comparison of vaccine efficacy between H5 Texas Mut vaccine and H5 Ast20 Mut vaccine in mice (A) Schematic of cleavage-defective mutant (Mut) HA mRNA vaccines. (B) Western blotting analysis of HA protein expression in transfected BHK-21 cells. Cells were transfected with varying doses (50, 100, 200, and 500 ng/μL) of Texas Mut or Ast20 Mut mRNA. (C) Mice were vaccinated (i.m.) with 1 or 5 μg Texas/Ast20 mRNA-LNP (SM102) encoding Mut HA or placebo using in a prime-boost schedule with an interval of 4 weeks. Blood samples ( n = 8) were collected from mice 2 weeks after prime and boost. Binding IgG of serum, reactive to the Texas HA protein, was measured by ELISA. Titers of placebo group were below detection limit. (D) 50% neutralization titers of pseudotyped virus (A/Texas/37/2024) in serum collected 2 weeks post-boost (week 6). Titers of placebo group were below detection limit. (E and F) Binding IgG of 1 μg Texas vaccine group (E) and Ast20 vaccine group (F) was measured by ELISA, reactive to the HA of clade 1 virus (A/Viet Nam/1203/2004), clade 2.1.3.2 virus (A/Indonesia/5/2005), clade 2.2 virus (A/bar-headed goose/Qinghai/5/2005), clade 2.3.2.1a virus (A/Hubei/1/2010), clade 2.3.4 virus (A/Anhui/1/2005), clade 2.3.4.4b virus (A/Astrakhan/3212/2020), and clade 2.3.4.4b virus (A/Texas/37/2024). (G) Radar chart of broad-binding IgG levels elicited by 1 μg Texas vaccine and Ast20 vaccine. (H) Vaccination schedule. Mice were vaccinated (i.m.) with 1 or 5 μg mRNA-LNP (SM102) encoding Texas HA-Mut, Ast20 HA-Mut, or placebo. Four weeks post-vaccination (week 4), mice were challenged with 50 × LD 50 of A/ostrich/China/HB/2024. Virus load of organs in vaccinated mice 1, 3, 5 days post-infection determined using plaque assays on MDCK cells. (I–L) Virus load of lung (I), heart (J), kidney (K), and brain (L). The dashed horizontal line indicates the assay limit of detection. Data are presented as the mean ± SD; p values are analyzed with t test (∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001) (C–L). ∗/∗∗∗ (E and F) indicates significant differences between other HA proteins and Texas (E) or Ast20 (F) protein. ∗ (E and F) indicates significant differences between other HA proteins and Texas (E) or Ast20 (F) protein. ∗ (I–L) indicates significant differences between placebo and vaccination groups in the same day.

    Article Snippet: HA recombinant protein of A/Indonesia/5/2005 , Synthesized from Novoprotein , N/A.

    Techniques: Comparison, Mutagenesis, Vaccines, Western Blot, Expressing, Transfection, Binding Assay, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Neutralization, Virus, Infection