computer generated randomization sequence (STATA Corporation)
STATA Corporation is a verified supplier 
99
Structured Review
STATA Corporation
computer generated randomization sequence
Computer Generated Randomization Sequence, supplied by STATA Corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 35664 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/computer+generated/STATA+16%2E0/pm41906101-74-23-26
Average 99 stars, based on 35664 article reviews
Computer Generated Randomization Sequence, supplied by STATA Corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 35664 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/computer+generated/STATA+16%2E0/pm41906101-74-23-26
Average 99 stars, based on 35664 article reviews
computer generated randomization sequence - by Bioz Stars,
2026-10
99/100 stars
Images
Related Articles
Extraction:Article Title: Characteristics of Speech Sound Development in Preterm‐Born Children: A Scoping Review Article Snippet: Sanchez et al. ( ) Australia , Corrected age . DEAP articulation and phonology subtests at age 3y. Speech assessments administered by SLTs , Continuous variables used for predictor analyses were: percentage of consonants correct standard score, number of consonants produced (including stimulability—a measure of articulation), and number of phonological processes (a measure of phonology). The number of children scoring more than one standard deviation (SD) below the mean on the DEAP Oro‐Motor subtest was also reported. , REDCap used for data entry. STATA for analysis. Group differences (aim 1) and potential predictors (aim 2) of language, speech, and voice outcomes were evaluated via linear regression fitted using generalized estimating equations to account for multiple births or ordered logistic regression clustered for multiple births. Number of consonants produced and number of phonological processes were not normally distributed. Logarithmic transformation did not result in normal distribution, and so robust standard errors were used to compensate for non‐normality. In analysing potential predictors, univariable analysis was conducted first for all predictors, with only significant predictors in the univariable analysis then added to the multivariable analysis. A significance level of p < 0.05 was adopted. No adjustments for multiple comparisons were made. Hypothesized predictors were selected on the basis of having been significantly predictive of language, speech, or voice outcomes in previous studies. Sensorineural hearing loss was a planned predictor for analysis but was omitted owing to low numbers ( n =2). Predictors of interest included sex, gestational age at birth, birthweight z‐score, chronic lung disease (oxygen at 36wks), high social risk (score ≥2 on Social Risk Index), multilingualism, neurodevelopmental diagnosis (as reported by parents), and oromotor feeding impairment at 12 months (defined as failing one or more food challenges on the Schedule for Oral Motor Assessment). , On univariable analysis, neither PCC score nor phonological processes were associated with gestational age . Speech sound difficulties were present in 32.7% of the PT group, and 29.2% of the term group. Of the children with speech sound difficulties, 29 (16 PT, 13 term) had both articulation and phonological difficulties; nine (four PT, five term) had phonological difficulties but no articulation difficulties; and 20 (10 PT, 10 term) had articulation difficulties but no phonological difficulties.. .. van Blankenstein et al. ( ) UK , Corrected age. Data extraction from NNRD , Presence of a 2‐year neurodevelopmental assessment record in the NNRD, use of standardised assessment tools, results of functional 2‐year neurodevelopmental assessments (visual, auditory, neuromotor, communication, overall development). , SAS Functional Assay:Article Title: Characteristics of Speech Sound Development in Preterm‐Born Children: A Scoping Review Article Snippet: Sanchez et al. ( ) Australia , Corrected age . DEAP articulation and phonology subtests at age 3y. Speech assessments administered by SLTs , Continuous variables used for predictor analyses were: percentage of consonants correct standard score, number of consonants produced (including stimulability—a measure of articulation), and number of phonological processes (a measure of phonology). The number of children scoring more than one standard deviation (SD) below the mean on the DEAP Oro‐Motor subtest was also reported. , REDCap used for data entry. STATA for analysis. Group differences (aim 1) and potential predictors (aim 2) of language, speech, and voice outcomes were evaluated via linear regression fitted using generalized estimating equations to account for multiple births or ordered logistic regression clustered for multiple births. Number of consonants produced and number of phonological processes were not normally distributed. Logarithmic transformation did not result in normal distribution, and so robust standard errors were used to compensate for non‐normality. In analysing potential predictors, univariable analysis was conducted first for all predictors, with only significant predictors in the univariable analysis then added to the multivariable analysis. A significance level of p < 0.05 was adopted. No adjustments for multiple comparisons were made. Hypothesized predictors were selected on the basis of having been significantly predictive of language, speech, or voice outcomes in previous studies. Sensorineural hearing loss was a planned predictor for analysis but was omitted owing to low numbers ( n =2). Predictors of interest included sex, gestational age at birth, birthweight z‐score, chronic lung disease (oxygen at 36wks), high social risk (score ≥2 on Social Risk Index), multilingualism, neurodevelopmental diagnosis (as reported by parents), and oromotor feeding impairment at 12 months (defined as failing one or more food challenges on the Schedule for Oral Motor Assessment). , On univariable analysis, neither PCC score nor phonological processes were associated with gestational age . Speech sound difficulties were present in 32.7% of the PT group, and 29.2% of the term group. Of the children with speech sound difficulties, 29 (16 PT, 13 term) had both articulation and phonological difficulties; nine (four PT, five term) had phonological difficulties but no articulation difficulties; and 20 (10 PT, 10 term) had articulation difficulties but no phonological difficulties.. .. van Blankenstein et al. ( ) UK , Corrected age. Data extraction from NNRD , Presence of a 2‐year neurodevelopmental assessment record in the NNRD, use of standardised assessment tools, results of functional 2‐year neurodevelopmental assessments (visual, auditory, neuromotor, communication, overall development). , SAS Software:Article Title: Characteristics of Speech Sound Development in Preterm‐Born Children: A Scoping Review Article Snippet: Sanchez et al. ( ) Australia , Corrected age . DEAP articulation and phonology subtests at age 3y. Speech assessments administered by SLTs , Continuous variables used for predictor analyses were: percentage of consonants correct standard score, number of consonants produced (including stimulability—a measure of articulation), and number of phonological processes (a measure of phonology). The number of children scoring more than one standard deviation (SD) below the mean on the DEAP Oro‐Motor subtest was also reported. , REDCap used for data entry. STATA for analysis. Group differences (aim 1) and potential predictors (aim 2) of language, speech, and voice outcomes were evaluated via linear regression fitted using generalized estimating equations to account for multiple births or ordered logistic regression clustered for multiple births. Number of consonants produced and number of phonological processes were not normally distributed. Logarithmic transformation did not result in normal distribution, and so robust standard errors were used to compensate for non‐normality. In analysing potential predictors, univariable analysis was conducted first for all predictors, with only significant predictors in the univariable analysis then added to the multivariable analysis. A significance level of p < 0.05 was adopted. No adjustments for multiple comparisons were made. Hypothesized predictors were selected on the basis of having been significantly predictive of language, speech, or voice outcomes in previous studies. Sensorineural hearing loss was a planned predictor for analysis but was omitted owing to low numbers ( n =2). Predictors of interest included sex, gestational age at birth, birthweight z‐score, chronic lung disease (oxygen at 36wks), high social risk (score ≥2 on Social Risk Index), multilingualism, neurodevelopmental diagnosis (as reported by parents), and oromotor feeding impairment at 12 months (defined as failing one or more food challenges on the Schedule for Oral Motor Assessment). , On univariable analysis, neither PCC score nor phonological processes were associated with gestational age . Speech sound difficulties were present in 32.7% of the PT group, and 29.2% of the term group. Of the children with speech sound difficulties, 29 (16 PT, 13 term) had both articulation and phonological difficulties; nine (four PT, five term) had phonological difficulties but no articulation difficulties; and 20 (10 PT, 10 term) had articulation difficulties but no phonological difficulties.. .. van Blankenstein et al. ( ) UK , Corrected age. Data extraction from NNRD , Presence of a 2‐year neurodevelopmental assessment record in the NNRD, use of standardised assessment tools, results of functional 2‐year neurodevelopmental assessments (visual, auditory, neuromotor, communication, overall development). , SAS Radial Immuno Diffusion:Article Title: Characteristics of Speech Sound Development in Preterm‐Born Children: A Scoping Review Article Snippet: Sanchez et al. ( ) Australia , Corrected age . DEAP articulation and phonology subtests at age 3y. Speech assessments administered by SLTs , Continuous variables used for predictor analyses were: percentage of consonants correct standard score, number of consonants produced (including stimulability—a measure of articulation), and number of phonological processes (a measure of phonology). The number of children scoring more than one standard deviation (SD) below the mean on the DEAP Oro‐Motor subtest was also reported. , REDCap used for data entry. STATA for analysis. Group differences (aim 1) and potential predictors (aim 2) of language, speech, and voice outcomes were evaluated via linear regression fitted using generalized estimating equations to account for multiple births or ordered logistic regression clustered for multiple births. Number of consonants produced and number of phonological processes were not normally distributed. Logarithmic transformation did not result in normal distribution, and so robust standard errors were used to compensate for non‐normality. In analysing potential predictors, univariable analysis was conducted first for all predictors, with only significant predictors in the univariable analysis then added to the multivariable analysis. A significance level of p < 0.05 was adopted. No adjustments for multiple comparisons were made. Hypothesized predictors were selected on the basis of having been significantly predictive of language, speech, or voice outcomes in previous studies. Sensorineural hearing loss was a planned predictor for analysis but was omitted owing to low numbers ( n =2). Predictors of interest included sex, gestational age at birth, birthweight z‐score, chronic lung disease (oxygen at 36wks), high social risk (score ≥2 on Social Risk Index), multilingualism, neurodevelopmental diagnosis (as reported by parents), and oromotor feeding impairment at 12 months (defined as failing one or more food challenges on the Schedule for Oral Motor Assessment). , On univariable analysis, neither PCC score nor phonological processes were associated with gestational age . Speech sound difficulties were present in 32.7% of the PT group, and 29.2% of the term group. Of the children with speech sound difficulties, 29 (16 PT, 13 term) had both articulation and phonological difficulties; nine (four PT, five term) had phonological difficulties but no articulation difficulties; and 20 (10 PT, 10 term) had articulation difficulties but no phonological difficulties.. .. van Blankenstein et al. ( ) UK , Corrected age. Data extraction from NNRD , Presence of a 2‐year neurodevelopmental assessment record in the NNRD, use of standardised assessment tools, results of functional 2‐year neurodevelopmental assessments (visual, auditory, neuromotor, communication, overall development). , SAS Derivative Assay:Article Title: Characteristics of Speech Sound Development in Preterm‐Born Children: A Scoping Review Article Snippet: Sanchez et al. ( ) Australia , Corrected age . DEAP articulation and phonology subtests at age 3y. Speech assessments administered by SLTs , Continuous variables used for predictor analyses were: percentage of consonants correct standard score, number of consonants produced (including stimulability—a measure of articulation), and number of phonological processes (a measure of phonology). The number of children scoring more than one standard deviation (SD) below the mean on the DEAP Oro‐Motor subtest was also reported. , REDCap used for data entry. STATA for analysis. Group differences (aim 1) and potential predictors (aim 2) of language, speech, and voice outcomes were evaluated via linear regression fitted using generalized estimating equations to account for multiple births or ordered logistic regression clustered for multiple births. Number of consonants produced and number of phonological processes were not normally distributed. Logarithmic transformation did not result in normal distribution, and so robust standard errors were used to compensate for non‐normality. In analysing potential predictors, univariable analysis was conducted first for all predictors, with only significant predictors in the univariable analysis then added to the multivariable analysis. A significance level of p < 0.05 was adopted. No adjustments for multiple comparisons were made. Hypothesized predictors were selected on the basis of having been significantly predictive of language, speech, or voice outcomes in previous studies. Sensorineural hearing loss was a planned predictor for analysis but was omitted owing to low numbers ( n =2). Predictors of interest included sex, gestational age at birth, birthweight z‐score, chronic lung disease (oxygen at 36wks), high social risk (score ≥2 on Social Risk Index), multilingualism, neurodevelopmental diagnosis (as reported by parents), and oromotor feeding impairment at 12 months (defined as failing one or more food challenges on the Schedule for Oral Motor Assessment). , On univariable analysis, neither PCC score nor phonological processes were associated with gestational age . Speech sound difficulties were present in 32.7% of the PT group, and 29.2% of the term group. Of the children with speech sound difficulties, 29 (16 PT, 13 term) had both articulation and phonological difficulties; nine (four PT, five term) had phonological difficulties but no articulation difficulties; and 20 (10 PT, 10 term) had articulation difficulties but no phonological difficulties.. .. van Blankenstein et al. ( ) UK , Corrected age. Data extraction from NNRD , Presence of a 2‐year neurodevelopmental assessment record in the NNRD, use of standardised assessment tools, results of functional 2‐year neurodevelopmental assessments (visual, auditory, neuromotor, communication, overall development). , SAS Analysis:Article Title: Asymptomatic vs. Symptomatic Carotid Revascularization: A Single Institution Retrospective Review. Article Snippet: .. 111 Statistical Analysis 112 Statistical analysis was performed using Article Title: Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients With Negative Patch Test Results and Systematic Literature Review. Article Snippet: Background: Patients with negative patch test (NPT) results do not receive allergy avoidance counselling, and their experiences are important to understand.. Objective: To describe the clinical presentation and outcomes associated with NPT results.. Methods: Crosssectional study analysing data from an IRBapproved REDCap registry. Article Title: Stage-Specific Associations Between Respiratory Pathogens and Mortality in Sheep: A Multivariate Analysis. Article Snippet: .. Conventional multivariate statistics and their corresponding parametric significance tests were initially obtained using the Canonical Correlation function in the Multivariate Analysis menu and the Chi-Square:Article Title: Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients With Negative Patch Test Results and Systematic Literature Review. Article Snippet: Background: Patients with negative patch test (NPT) results do not receive allergy avoidance counselling, and their experiences are important to understand.. Objective: To describe the clinical presentation and outcomes associated with NPT results.. Methods: Crosssectional study analysing data from an IRBapproved REDCap registry. T-Test:Article Title: Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients With Negative Patch Test Results and Systematic Literature Review. Article Snippet: Background: Patients with negative patch test (NPT) results do not receive allergy avoidance counselling, and their experiences are important to understand.. Objective: To describe the clinical presentation and outcomes associated with NPT results.. Methods: Crosssectional study analysing data from an IRBapproved REDCap registry. other:Article Title: Survival Status and Predictors of Mortality Among Women With Breast Cancer in Southern Ethiopia: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Article Snippet: The minimum sample size required with an exponential model in Article Title: Quality of Life in Adults With Severe Obesity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cross-Sectional Studies. Article Snippet: All statistical analyses were conducted using |
