HY-147095 Search Results


93
MedChemExpress dtag47
Dtag47, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/dtag47/product/MedChemExpress
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
dtag47 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

92
MedChemExpress tazemetostat
<t>Tazemetostat</t> sensitizes PDAC cells to gemcitabine by upregulating the KLF15 expression ( A ) Cell viability analyses were performed in PANC-1-Vector, PANC-1-KLF15-OE, BxPC-3-Scramble and BxPC-3-KLF15-KD after Gemcitabine treatment. ( B ) Apoptotic cell analyses using flow cytometry were performed in PANC-1-Vector, PANC-1-KLF15-OE, BxPC-3-Scramble and BxPC-3-KLF15-KD after Gemcitabine treatment(left), and the proportion of apoptotic cells statistical analysis (right). * P < 0.05. (C-D) Western blot on the expression of H3K27me3, EZH2, KLF15 and Nanog after Tazemetostat treatment. (E-F) Q-PCR on the expression of KLF15 after treatment by different concentrations of Tazemetostat, GAPDH as the control. (G-H) ELDA for PANC-1 and SW1990 cells after Tazemetostat treatment, using the ELDA software ( http://bioinf.wehi.edu.au/software/elda ). All above experiments were repeated three times independently. Paired Student’s t-test was used for statistical analysis. * P < 0.05 ** P < 0.01*** P < 0.001. ( I ) The subcutaneous tumors formed by four groups: control, Tazemetostat, gemcitabine and the combination of Tazemetostat and gemcitabine, H&E staining and IHC staining of Ki67 in above four groups. (mean ± SD, n = 3), Scale bar (black), 200 μm. ( J ) The statistical analysis of Ki67 staining in the above four groups. (K-L) The volume ( K ) and the weight ( L ) of subcutaneous tumors in above four groups, (mean ± SD, n = 3), * P < 0.05 ** P < 0.01*** P < 0.001
Tazemetostat, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/tazemetostat/product/MedChemExpress
Average 92 stars, based on 1 article reviews
tazemetostat - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
92/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
MedChemExpress oryzalin
a Analysis of the subcellular location of GFP-FREE1 before and after monensin treatment. Scale bar, 20 μm. b Time-series analysis of the invagination of ATG8-positive vesicles in free1 (-/-) mutant. The magenta arrows indicated a vesicle that adhered inside the vacuolar membrane; white arrows indicated invaginated vesicles. Scale bar, 10 μm. c Confirmation of the validity of the dexamethasone (DEX)-inducible dominant-negative mutants, DEX:SNF7.1(L32W) and DEX:VPS4(E232Q). The transgenic seeds were germinated on agar plates containing 10 μM DEX. Representative images were captured after 5 days of growth under light. Scale bar, 1 cm. d A schematic diagram showing the treatment flow of DEX-inducible dominant-negative mutants. e , f Time-series analysis of the invaginated vesicles in YFP-ATG8e/DEX:SNF7.1(L32W) ( e ) and YFP-ATG8e/DEX:VPS4(E232Q) ( f ) plants after DEX induction. The magenta arrows indicated vesicles that adhered inside the tonoplast. Scale bars, 20 μm. g TEM analysis of vacuolar morphology in free1 (-/-) mutant and DEX:VPS4(E232Q) transgenic plants. The magenta arrows indicate invaginating vesicles. Scale bars, 1 μm. h , i Analysis of the effects of cytoskeletal disruption on the formation of ATG8-positive vesicles. Microtubules were visualized using a mCherry-TUA5 fusion protein ( h ), while microfilaments were labeled with ABD2-GFP ( i ). <t>Oryzalin</t> (10 μM) <t>and</t> <t>latrunculin</t> B (10 μM) were employed to disrupt microtubule and microfilament structures, respectively. The invaginated vesicles were denoted by yellow arrowheads. Scale bars, 20 μm. j Confocal time-lapse analysis the effects of microfilament disruption on the dynamics of ATG8-positive vesicle invagination. White arrowheads indicated the invaginated vesicles. Scale bar, 20 μm. Similar confocal imaging results were obtained in at least six individual roots with three replicates.
Oryzalin, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/oryzalin/product/MedChemExpress
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
oryzalin - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier


Image Search Results


Tazemetostat sensitizes PDAC cells to gemcitabine by upregulating the KLF15 expression ( A ) Cell viability analyses were performed in PANC-1-Vector, PANC-1-KLF15-OE, BxPC-3-Scramble and BxPC-3-KLF15-KD after Gemcitabine treatment. ( B ) Apoptotic cell analyses using flow cytometry were performed in PANC-1-Vector, PANC-1-KLF15-OE, BxPC-3-Scramble and BxPC-3-KLF15-KD after Gemcitabine treatment(left), and the proportion of apoptotic cells statistical analysis (right). * P < 0.05. (C-D) Western blot on the expression of H3K27me3, EZH2, KLF15 and Nanog after Tazemetostat treatment. (E-F) Q-PCR on the expression of KLF15 after treatment by different concentrations of Tazemetostat, GAPDH as the control. (G-H) ELDA for PANC-1 and SW1990 cells after Tazemetostat treatment, using the ELDA software ( http://bioinf.wehi.edu.au/software/elda ). All above experiments were repeated three times independently. Paired Student’s t-test was used for statistical analysis. * P < 0.05 ** P < 0.01*** P < 0.001. ( I ) The subcutaneous tumors formed by four groups: control, Tazemetostat, gemcitabine and the combination of Tazemetostat and gemcitabine, H&E staining and IHC staining of Ki67 in above four groups. (mean ± SD, n = 3), Scale bar (black), 200 μm. ( J ) The statistical analysis of Ki67 staining in the above four groups. (K-L) The volume ( K ) and the weight ( L ) of subcutaneous tumors in above four groups, (mean ± SD, n = 3), * P < 0.05 ** P < 0.01*** P < 0.001

Journal: Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences: CMLS

Article Title: KLF15 suppresses stemness of pancreatic cancer by decreasing USP21-mediated Nanog stability

doi: 10.1007/s00018-024-05442-6

Figure Lengend Snippet: Tazemetostat sensitizes PDAC cells to gemcitabine by upregulating the KLF15 expression ( A ) Cell viability analyses were performed in PANC-1-Vector, PANC-1-KLF15-OE, BxPC-3-Scramble and BxPC-3-KLF15-KD after Gemcitabine treatment. ( B ) Apoptotic cell analyses using flow cytometry were performed in PANC-1-Vector, PANC-1-KLF15-OE, BxPC-3-Scramble and BxPC-3-KLF15-KD after Gemcitabine treatment(left), and the proportion of apoptotic cells statistical analysis (right). * P < 0.05. (C-D) Western blot on the expression of H3K27me3, EZH2, KLF15 and Nanog after Tazemetostat treatment. (E-F) Q-PCR on the expression of KLF15 after treatment by different concentrations of Tazemetostat, GAPDH as the control. (G-H) ELDA for PANC-1 and SW1990 cells after Tazemetostat treatment, using the ELDA software ( http://bioinf.wehi.edu.au/software/elda ). All above experiments were repeated three times independently. Paired Student’s t-test was used for statistical analysis. * P < 0.05 ** P < 0.01*** P < 0.001. ( I ) The subcutaneous tumors formed by four groups: control, Tazemetostat, gemcitabine and the combination of Tazemetostat and gemcitabine, H&E staining and IHC staining of Ki67 in above four groups. (mean ± SD, n = 3), Scale bar (black), 200 μm. ( J ) The statistical analysis of Ki67 staining in the above four groups. (K-L) The volume ( K ) and the weight ( L ) of subcutaneous tumors in above four groups, (mean ± SD, n = 3), * P < 0.05 ** P < 0.01*** P < 0.001

Article Snippet: One week later, Gemcitabine (20 mg/kg/day, DMSO was used as control, MCE, HY-17026) was injected once a week, and Tazemetostat (100 mg/kg, DMSO was used as control, MCE, HY-147090) was injected three times a week.

Techniques: Expressing, Plasmid Preparation, Flow Cytometry, Western Blot, Control, Software, Staining, Immunohistochemistry

a Analysis of the subcellular location of GFP-FREE1 before and after monensin treatment. Scale bar, 20 μm. b Time-series analysis of the invagination of ATG8-positive vesicles in free1 (-/-) mutant. The magenta arrows indicated a vesicle that adhered inside the vacuolar membrane; white arrows indicated invaginated vesicles. Scale bar, 10 μm. c Confirmation of the validity of the dexamethasone (DEX)-inducible dominant-negative mutants, DEX:SNF7.1(L32W) and DEX:VPS4(E232Q). The transgenic seeds were germinated on agar plates containing 10 μM DEX. Representative images were captured after 5 days of growth under light. Scale bar, 1 cm. d A schematic diagram showing the treatment flow of DEX-inducible dominant-negative mutants. e , f Time-series analysis of the invaginated vesicles in YFP-ATG8e/DEX:SNF7.1(L32W) ( e ) and YFP-ATG8e/DEX:VPS4(E232Q) ( f ) plants after DEX induction. The magenta arrows indicated vesicles that adhered inside the tonoplast. Scale bars, 20 μm. g TEM analysis of vacuolar morphology in free1 (-/-) mutant and DEX:VPS4(E232Q) transgenic plants. The magenta arrows indicate invaginating vesicles. Scale bars, 1 μm. h , i Analysis of the effects of cytoskeletal disruption on the formation of ATG8-positive vesicles. Microtubules were visualized using a mCherry-TUA5 fusion protein ( h ), while microfilaments were labeled with ABD2-GFP ( i ). Oryzalin (10 μM) and latrunculin B (10 μM) were employed to disrupt microtubule and microfilament structures, respectively. The invaginated vesicles were denoted by yellow arrowheads. Scale bars, 20 μm. j Confocal time-lapse analysis the effects of microfilament disruption on the dynamics of ATG8-positive vesicle invagination. White arrowheads indicated the invaginated vesicles. Scale bar, 20 μm. Similar confocal imaging results were obtained in at least six individual roots with three replicates.

Journal: Nature Communications

Article Title: ATG8ylation-mediated tonoplast invagination mitigates vacuole damage

doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-62084-3

Figure Lengend Snippet: a Analysis of the subcellular location of GFP-FREE1 before and after monensin treatment. Scale bar, 20 μm. b Time-series analysis of the invagination of ATG8-positive vesicles in free1 (-/-) mutant. The magenta arrows indicated a vesicle that adhered inside the vacuolar membrane; white arrows indicated invaginated vesicles. Scale bar, 10 μm. c Confirmation of the validity of the dexamethasone (DEX)-inducible dominant-negative mutants, DEX:SNF7.1(L32W) and DEX:VPS4(E232Q). The transgenic seeds were germinated on agar plates containing 10 μM DEX. Representative images were captured after 5 days of growth under light. Scale bar, 1 cm. d A schematic diagram showing the treatment flow of DEX-inducible dominant-negative mutants. e , f Time-series analysis of the invaginated vesicles in YFP-ATG8e/DEX:SNF7.1(L32W) ( e ) and YFP-ATG8e/DEX:VPS4(E232Q) ( f ) plants after DEX induction. The magenta arrows indicated vesicles that adhered inside the tonoplast. Scale bars, 20 μm. g TEM analysis of vacuolar morphology in free1 (-/-) mutant and DEX:VPS4(E232Q) transgenic plants. The magenta arrows indicate invaginating vesicles. Scale bars, 1 μm. h , i Analysis of the effects of cytoskeletal disruption on the formation of ATG8-positive vesicles. Microtubules were visualized using a mCherry-TUA5 fusion protein ( h ), while microfilaments were labeled with ABD2-GFP ( i ). Oryzalin (10 μM) and latrunculin B (10 μM) were employed to disrupt microtubule and microfilament structures, respectively. The invaginated vesicles were denoted by yellow arrowheads. Scale bars, 20 μm. j Confocal time-lapse analysis the effects of microfilament disruption on the dynamics of ATG8-positive vesicle invagination. White arrowheads indicated the invaginated vesicles. Scale bar, 20 μm. Similar confocal imaging results were obtained in at least six individual roots with three replicates.

Article Snippet: ConcA (MCE, #HY-N1724) and wortmannin (MCE, #HY-10197), oryzalin (MCE, #HY-147092), and latrunculin B (MCE, #HY-101848) stock solutions were prepared at concentrations of 1, 16.5, 10, and 10 mM, respectively, in DMSO and stored at − 20 °C.

Techniques: Mutagenesis, Membrane, Dominant Negative Mutation, Transgenic Assay, Disruption, Labeling, Imaging