16s v4 sequencing Search Results


90
RStudio 16s rrna amplicon metagenomic sequencing analyses
Difference of resistance gene targets between drug-free and conventional flocks for each farm at sampling time point one. Negative results indicate a decrease in gene target, and positive results indicate an increase in gene target in drug-free flocks. Data are presented as the mean (SEM) of 12 replicates. For the quantitative approach, each sample was run in triplicate ( n = 3). (A) Values are expressed on a ratio referenced to the total bacterial content of samples <t>(16S</t> <t>rRNA).</t> (B) Values are expressed on a weight basis (raw values). *Significant values are lower than the alpha level adjusted with the Benjamini–Hochberg method.
16s Rrna Amplicon Metagenomic Sequencing Analyses, supplied by RStudio, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/16s+v4+sequencing/sequence+analysis+of+the+v4+region+of+the+16s+rrna+gene+amplicons/pmc07779680-197-2-18
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
16s rrna amplicon metagenomic sequencing analyses - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
BGI Tech Solutions Co Ltd sequencing for the bacterial variable v4 regions of the 16s rdna gene
Difference of resistance gene targets between drug-free and conventional flocks for each farm at sampling time point one. Negative results indicate a decrease in gene target, and positive results indicate an increase in gene target in drug-free flocks. Data are presented as the mean (SEM) of 12 replicates. For the quantitative approach, each sample was run in triplicate ( n = 3). (A) Values are expressed on a ratio referenced to the total bacterial content of samples <t>(16S</t> <t>rRNA).</t> (B) Values are expressed on a weight basis (raw values). *Significant values are lower than the alpha level adjusted with the Benjamini–Hochberg method.
Sequencing For The Bacterial Variable V4 Regions Of The 16s Rdna Gene, supplied by BGI Tech Solutions Co Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/16s+v4+sequencing/sequencing+for+bacterial+variable+v4+regions+of+the+16s+rdna+gene/pmc06180576-76-0-16
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
sequencing for the bacterial variable v4 regions of the 16s rdna gene - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Microsynth ag 16s rdna v3-v4 region amplicon sequencing
Difference of resistance gene targets between drug-free and conventional flocks for each farm at sampling time point one. Negative results indicate a decrease in gene target, and positive results indicate an increase in gene target in drug-free flocks. Data are presented as the mean (SEM) of 12 replicates. For the quantitative approach, each sample was run in triplicate ( n = 3). (A) Values are expressed on a ratio referenced to the total bacterial content of samples <t>(16S</t> <t>rRNA).</t> (B) Values are expressed on a weight basis (raw values). *Significant values are lower than the alpha level adjusted with the Benjamini–Hochberg method.
16s Rdna V3 V4 Region Amplicon Sequencing, supplied by Microsynth ag, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/16s+v4+sequencing/16s+rdna+v3+v4+region+amplicon+sequencing/pm40339274-98-11-6
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
16s rdna v3-v4 region amplicon sequencing - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Clevergene Biocorp Pvt 16s rrna v3-v4 hyper variable region sequencing
Difference of resistance gene targets between drug-free and conventional flocks for each farm at sampling time point one. Negative results indicate a decrease in gene target, and positive results indicate an increase in gene target in drug-free flocks. Data are presented as the mean (SEM) of 12 replicates. For the quantitative approach, each sample was run in triplicate ( n = 3). (A) Values are expressed on a ratio referenced to the total bacterial content of samples <t>(16S</t> <t>rRNA).</t> (B) Values are expressed on a weight basis (raw values). *Significant values are lower than the alpha level adjusted with the Benjamini–Hochberg method.
16s Rrna V3 V4 Hyper Variable Region Sequencing, supplied by Clevergene Biocorp Pvt, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/16s+v4+sequencing/16s+rrna+v3+v4+hyper+variable+region+sequencing/pm37695333-71-0-7
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
16s rrna v3-v4 hyper variable region sequencing - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Ribobio co v4 region of the 16s rdna gene sequencing
Difference of resistance gene targets between drug-free and conventional flocks for each farm at sampling time point one. Negative results indicate a decrease in gene target, and positive results indicate an increase in gene target in drug-free flocks. Data are presented as the mean (SEM) of 12 replicates. For the quantitative approach, each sample was run in triplicate ( n = 3). (A) Values are expressed on a ratio referenced to the total bacterial content of samples <t>(16S</t> <t>rRNA).</t> (B) Values are expressed on a weight basis (raw values). *Significant values are lower than the alpha level adjusted with the Benjamini–Hochberg method.
V4 Region Of The 16s Rdna Gene Sequencing, supplied by Ribobio co, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/16s+v4+sequencing/v4+region+of+the+16s+rdna+gene+sequencing/pmc05822350-90-10-6
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
v4 region of the 16s rdna gene sequencing - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Oxford Nanopore oxford nanopore sequencing v4–v9 16s rrna
Difference of resistance gene targets between drug-free and conventional flocks for each farm at sampling time point one. Negative results indicate a decrease in gene target, and positive results indicate an increase in gene target in drug-free flocks. Data are presented as the mean (SEM) of 12 replicates. For the quantitative approach, each sample was run in triplicate ( n = 3). (A) Values are expressed on a ratio referenced to the total bacterial content of samples <t>(16S</t> <t>rRNA).</t> (B) Values are expressed on a weight basis (raw values). *Significant values are lower than the alpha level adjusted with the Benjamini–Hochberg method.
Oxford Nanopore Sequencing V4–V9 16s Rrna, supplied by Oxford Nanopore, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/16s+v4+sequencing/oxford+nanopore+sequencing+v4+v9+16s+rrna/pm40509476-120-33-33
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
oxford nanopore sequencing v4–v9 16s rrna - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Genotypic Technology Pvt Ltd 16 s metagenomics amplicon sequencing (v3–v4)
Difference of resistance gene targets between drug-free and conventional flocks for each farm at sampling time point one. Negative results indicate a decrease in gene target, and positive results indicate an increase in gene target in drug-free flocks. Data are presented as the mean (SEM) of 12 replicates. For the quantitative approach, each sample was run in triplicate ( n = 3). (A) Values are expressed on a ratio referenced to the total bacterial content of samples <t>(16S</t> <t>rRNA).</t> (B) Values are expressed on a weight basis (raw values). *Significant values are lower than the alpha level adjusted with the Benjamini–Hochberg method.
16 S Metagenomics Amplicon Sequencing (V3–V4), supplied by Genotypic Technology Pvt Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/16s+v4+sequencing/16+s+metagenomics+amplicon+sequencing++v3+v4+/pm34923604-69-27-32
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
16 s metagenomics amplicon sequencing (v3–v4) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
BGI Genomics Co microbiota analyses by sequencing the v4 region of the 16s ribosomal ribonucleic acid (rrna)
Difference of resistance gene targets between drug-free and conventional flocks for each farm at sampling time point one. Negative results indicate a decrease in gene target, and positive results indicate an increase in gene target in drug-free flocks. Data are presented as the mean (SEM) of 12 replicates. For the quantitative approach, each sample was run in triplicate ( n = 3). (A) Values are expressed on a ratio referenced to the total bacterial content of samples <t>(16S</t> <t>rRNA).</t> (B) Values are expressed on a weight basis (raw values). *Significant values are lower than the alpha level adjusted with the Benjamini–Hochberg method.
Microbiota Analyses By Sequencing The V4 Region Of The 16s Ribosomal Ribonucleic Acid (Rrna), supplied by BGI Genomics Co, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/16s+v4+sequencing/microbiota+analyses+by+sequencing+the+v4+region+of+the+16s+ribosomal+ribonucleic+acid++rrna+/pmc08660811__41467_2021_27463_MOESM1_ESM-76-31-24
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
microbiota analyses by sequencing the v4 region of the 16s ribosomal ribonucleic acid (rrna) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
SeqMatic LLC 16s v4 sequencing
Difference of resistance gene targets between drug-free and conventional flocks for each farm at sampling time point one. Negative results indicate a decrease in gene target, and positive results indicate an increase in gene target in drug-free flocks. Data are presented as the mean (SEM) of 12 replicates. For the quantitative approach, each sample was run in triplicate ( n = 3). (A) Values are expressed on a ratio referenced to the total bacterial content of samples <t>(16S</t> <t>rRNA).</t> (B) Values are expressed on a weight basis (raw values). *Significant values are lower than the alpha level adjusted with the Benjamini–Hochberg method.
16s V4 Sequencing, supplied by SeqMatic LLC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/16s+v4+sequencing/16s+v4+sequencing/pmc06804886-171-16-11
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
16s v4 sequencing - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Microsynth ag dna extraction and sequencing of the v4 region of 16s ribosomal dna
Difference of resistance gene targets between drug-free and conventional flocks for each farm at sampling time point one. Negative results indicate a decrease in gene target, and positive results indicate an increase in gene target in drug-free flocks. Data are presented as the mean (SEM) of 12 replicates. For the quantitative approach, each sample was run in triplicate ( n = 3). (A) Values are expressed on a ratio referenced to the total bacterial content of samples <t>(16S</t> <t>rRNA).</t> (B) Values are expressed on a weight basis (raw values). *Significant values are lower than the alpha level adjusted with the Benjamini–Hochberg method.
Dna Extraction And Sequencing Of The V4 Region Of 16s Ribosomal Dna, supplied by Microsynth ag, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/16s+v4+sequencing/dna+extraction+and+sequencing+of+the+v4+region+of+16s+ribosomal+dna/pm40362641-266-3-15
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
dna extraction and sequencing of the v4 region of 16s ribosomal dna - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Nextera AS primers v3_next_for and v4_next_rev
Difference of resistance gene targets between drug-free and conventional flocks for each farm at sampling time point one. Negative results indicate a decrease in gene target, and positive results indicate an increase in gene target in drug-free flocks. Data are presented as the mean (SEM) of 12 replicates. For the quantitative approach, each sample was run in triplicate ( n = 3). (A) Values are expressed on a ratio referenced to the total bacterial content of samples <t>(16S</t> <t>rRNA).</t> (B) Values are expressed on a weight basis (raw values). *Significant values are lower than the alpha level adjusted with the Benjamini–Hochberg method.
Primers V3 Next For And V4 Next Rev, supplied by Nextera AS, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/16s+v4+sequencing/focus+specific+primers+for+the+v3+and+v4+regions+of+16s+rrna+gene+with+nextera+overhang+sequence/pmc11525425-67-14-33
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
primers v3_next_for and v4_next_rev - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
BGI Tech Solutions Co Ltd 16s-v4 amplicon sequencing
Difference of resistance gene targets between drug-free and conventional flocks for each farm at sampling time point one. Negative results indicate a decrease in gene target, and positive results indicate an increase in gene target in drug-free flocks. Data are presented as the mean (SEM) of 12 replicates. For the quantitative approach, each sample was run in triplicate ( n = 3). (A) Values are expressed on a ratio referenced to the total bacterial content of samples <t>(16S</t> <t>rRNA).</t> (B) Values are expressed on a weight basis (raw values). *Significant values are lower than the alpha level adjusted with the Benjamini–Hochberg method.
16s V4 Amplicon Sequencing, supplied by BGI Tech Solutions Co Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/16s+v4+sequencing/16s+v4+amplicon+sequencing+with+package+hiseq2500/pmc11352132-75-18-10
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
16s-v4 amplicon sequencing - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Difference of resistance gene targets between drug-free and conventional flocks for each farm at sampling time point one. Negative results indicate a decrease in gene target, and positive results indicate an increase in gene target in drug-free flocks. Data are presented as the mean (SEM) of 12 replicates. For the quantitative approach, each sample was run in triplicate ( n = 3). (A) Values are expressed on a ratio referenced to the total bacterial content of samples (16S rRNA). (B) Values are expressed on a weight basis (raw values). *Significant values are lower than the alpha level adjusted with the Benjamini–Hochberg method.

Journal: Frontiers in Veterinary Science

Article Title: Impacts of Short-Term Antibiotic Withdrawal and Long-Term Judicious Antibiotic Use on Resistance Gene Abundance and Cecal Microbiota Composition on Commercial Broiler Chicken Farms in Québec

doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.547181

Figure Lengend Snippet: Difference of resistance gene targets between drug-free and conventional flocks for each farm at sampling time point one. Negative results indicate a decrease in gene target, and positive results indicate an increase in gene target in drug-free flocks. Data are presented as the mean (SEM) of 12 replicates. For the quantitative approach, each sample was run in triplicate ( n = 3). (A) Values are expressed on a ratio referenced to the total bacterial content of samples (16S rRNA). (B) Values are expressed on a weight basis (raw values). *Significant values are lower than the alpha level adjusted with the Benjamini–Hochberg method.

Article Snippet: For the 16S rRNA amplicon metagenomic sequencing analyses, the alpha and the beta diversity indices were calculated using Rstudio.

Techniques: Sampling

Difference of resistance gene targets between flocks sampled from conventional barns at sampling time point one and the flock from the same barn at sampling time point two. At sampling time point one, conventional barns from farms C to F remained on a conventional rearing program after the 15-months study period, whereas barns from farms A and B moved to a program for judiciously using antibiotics. Negative results indicate a decrease in gene target, and positive results indicate an increase in gene target in the sampled flock at sampling time point two. Data are presented as the mean (SEM) of 12 replicates. For the quantitative approach, each sample was run in triplicate ( n = 3). (A) Values are expressed on a ratio referenced to the total bacterial content of samples (16S rRNA). (B) Values are expressed on a weight basis (raw values). *Significant values are lower than the alpha level adjusted with the Benjamini–Hochberg method.

Journal: Frontiers in Veterinary Science

Article Title: Impacts of Short-Term Antibiotic Withdrawal and Long-Term Judicious Antibiotic Use on Resistance Gene Abundance and Cecal Microbiota Composition on Commercial Broiler Chicken Farms in Québec

doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.547181

Figure Lengend Snippet: Difference of resistance gene targets between flocks sampled from conventional barns at sampling time point one and the flock from the same barn at sampling time point two. At sampling time point one, conventional barns from farms C to F remained on a conventional rearing program after the 15-months study period, whereas barns from farms A and B moved to a program for judiciously using antibiotics. Negative results indicate a decrease in gene target, and positive results indicate an increase in gene target in the sampled flock at sampling time point two. Data are presented as the mean (SEM) of 12 replicates. For the quantitative approach, each sample was run in triplicate ( n = 3). (A) Values are expressed on a ratio referenced to the total bacterial content of samples (16S rRNA). (B) Values are expressed on a weight basis (raw values). *Significant values are lower than the alpha level adjusted with the Benjamini–Hochberg method.

Article Snippet: For the 16S rRNA amplicon metagenomic sequencing analyses, the alpha and the beta diversity indices were calculated using Rstudio.

Techniques: Sampling

Difference of resistance gene targets between flocks sampled from drug-free barns at sampling time point one and the flock sampled from the same barn at sampling time point two. Drug-free barns from farms C to F went back to a conventional rearing protocol after the 15-months study period, whereas drug-free barns from farms A and B moved to a program for judiciously using antibiotics. Negative results indicate a decrease in gene target, and positive results indicate an increase in gene target in the sampled flock at sampling time point two. Data are presented as the mean (SEM) of 12 replicates. For the quantitative approach, each sample was run in triplicate ( n = 3). (A) Values are expressed on a ratio referenced to total bacterial content of samples (16S rRNA). (B) Values are expressed on a weight basis (raw values). *Significant values are lower than the alpha level adjusted with the Benjamini–Hochberg method.

Journal: Frontiers in Veterinary Science

Article Title: Impacts of Short-Term Antibiotic Withdrawal and Long-Term Judicious Antibiotic Use on Resistance Gene Abundance and Cecal Microbiota Composition on Commercial Broiler Chicken Farms in Québec

doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.547181

Figure Lengend Snippet: Difference of resistance gene targets between flocks sampled from drug-free barns at sampling time point one and the flock sampled from the same barn at sampling time point two. Drug-free barns from farms C to F went back to a conventional rearing protocol after the 15-months study period, whereas drug-free barns from farms A and B moved to a program for judiciously using antibiotics. Negative results indicate a decrease in gene target, and positive results indicate an increase in gene target in the sampled flock at sampling time point two. Data are presented as the mean (SEM) of 12 replicates. For the quantitative approach, each sample was run in triplicate ( n = 3). (A) Values are expressed on a ratio referenced to total bacterial content of samples (16S rRNA). (B) Values are expressed on a weight basis (raw values). *Significant values are lower than the alpha level adjusted with the Benjamini–Hochberg method.

Article Snippet: For the 16S rRNA amplicon metagenomic sequencing analyses, the alpha and the beta diversity indices were calculated using Rstudio.

Techniques: Sampling

Difference of resistance gene targets at sampling time point two between flocks of the same participating farm that adopted either a conventional rearing program or a program for judiciously using antibiotics after the completion of the 15-months study period, considering the barn that was on a drug-free program during the 15-months study period as the comparison reference unit. Negative results indicate a decrease in gene target, and positive results indicate an increase in gene target in the flock sampled at sampling time point two used as a reference unit. Data are presented as the mean (SEM) of 12 replicates. For the quantitative approach, each sample was run in triplicate ( n = 3). (A) Values are expressed on a ratio referenced to total bacterial content of samples (16S rRNA). (B) Values are expressed on a weight basis (raw values). *Significant values are lower than the alpha level adjusted with the Benjamini–Hochberg method.

Journal: Frontiers in Veterinary Science

Article Title: Impacts of Short-Term Antibiotic Withdrawal and Long-Term Judicious Antibiotic Use on Resistance Gene Abundance and Cecal Microbiota Composition on Commercial Broiler Chicken Farms in Québec

doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.547181

Figure Lengend Snippet: Difference of resistance gene targets at sampling time point two between flocks of the same participating farm that adopted either a conventional rearing program or a program for judiciously using antibiotics after the completion of the 15-months study period, considering the barn that was on a drug-free program during the 15-months study period as the comparison reference unit. Negative results indicate a decrease in gene target, and positive results indicate an increase in gene target in the flock sampled at sampling time point two used as a reference unit. Data are presented as the mean (SEM) of 12 replicates. For the quantitative approach, each sample was run in triplicate ( n = 3). (A) Values are expressed on a ratio referenced to total bacterial content of samples (16S rRNA). (B) Values are expressed on a weight basis (raw values). *Significant values are lower than the alpha level adjusted with the Benjamini–Hochberg method.

Article Snippet: For the 16S rRNA amplicon metagenomic sequencing analyses, the alpha and the beta diversity indices were calculated using Rstudio.

Techniques: Sampling, Comparison