vegfc Search Results


98
Thermo Fisher gene exp vegfc mm00437310 m1
Single cell RNA sequencing of VEGFR family in tanycytes. ( A ) On the left: Schematic of the ME representing its privileged localisation in the hypothalamus. On the right: Correlation between tanycyte subtypes and their corresponding hypothalamic nuclei. Tanycytes are color coded according to the UMAP in B. ( B ) UMAP showing clusters representative of four main tanycytic subpopulations generated by the reanalysis of scRNA-seq ME dataset from [18]. ( C ) Feature plots showing VEGFRs (Kdr, Flt1 and Flt4), ligands (Vegfa, Vegfb and <t>Vegfc)</t> and co-receptors (Nrp1 and Nrp2) in tanycytic subclusters. ( D ) Dot plot showing the expression of the different members of the family across the tanycytic subclusters
Gene Exp Vegfc Mm00437310 M1, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 98/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/vegfc/pmc13011515-17-2--1?v=Thermo+Fisher
Average 98 stars, based on 1 article reviews
gene exp vegfc mm00437310 m1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
98/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

91
OriGene vegf c
Single cell RNA sequencing of VEGFR family in tanycytes. ( A ) On the left: Schematic of the ME representing its privileged localisation in the hypothalamus. On the right: Correlation between tanycyte subtypes and their corresponding hypothalamic nuclei. Tanycytes are color coded according to the UMAP in B. ( B ) UMAP showing clusters representative of four main tanycytic subpopulations generated by the reanalysis of scRNA-seq ME dataset from [18]. ( C ) Feature plots showing VEGFRs (Kdr, Flt1 and Flt4), ligands (Vegfa, Vegfb and <t>Vegfc)</t> and co-receptors (Nrp1 and Nrp2) in tanycytic subclusters. ( D ) Dot plot showing the expression of the different members of the family across the tanycytic subclusters
Vegf C, supplied by OriGene, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 91/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/vegfc/pm37639949-113-15-17?v=OriGene
Average 91 stars, based on 1 article reviews
vegf c - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
91/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Cusabio immunosorbent assay kit
The ability of ADRCs for lymphangiogenesis in vitro (functional assay and differentiation assay). A, Enzyme‐linked <t>immunosorbent</t> assay (ELISA) revealed that the concentration of VEGF‐C was upregulated in ADRC‐CM compared to control. B, rhVEGF‐C induced LEC migration in a dose‐dependent manner, and ADRC‐CM also induced LEC migration. HPF indicates high‐powered field. * P <0.05 vs nontreated control cells. C, Proliferation assay also revealed that ADRC‐CM promoted LEC proliferation, but VEGF‐C did not. * P <0.05, ** P <0.01 vs control. D, Western blot analysis revealed that ADRC‐CM, as well as VEGF‐C, had an ability to phosphorylate Erk and eNOS in LECs. Western blot analysis showed that phosphorylated Erk (p‐Erk) and phosphorylated eNOS (p‐eNOS) expression was greater in the VEGF‐C– or ADRC‐CM–treated LECs than in control nontreated LECs. E, Cultured with growth factors, the expression of podoplanin mRNA was greater than that of control. Immunocytochemistry also revealed that cultured ADRCs were stained with LEC marker.
Immunosorbent Assay Kit, supplied by Cusabio, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/vegfc/pmc03487362-79-14-17?v=Cusabio
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
immunosorbent assay kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
Proteintech vegf c
The ability of ADRCs for lymphangiogenesis in vitro (functional assay and differentiation assay). A, Enzyme‐linked <t>immunosorbent</t> assay (ELISA) revealed that the concentration of VEGF‐C was upregulated in ADRC‐CM compared to control. B, rhVEGF‐C induced LEC migration in a dose‐dependent manner, and ADRC‐CM also induced LEC migration. HPF indicates high‐powered field. * P <0.05 vs nontreated control cells. C, Proliferation assay also revealed that ADRC‐CM promoted LEC proliferation, but VEGF‐C did not. * P <0.05, ** P <0.01 vs control. D, Western blot analysis revealed that ADRC‐CM, as well as VEGF‐C, had an ability to phosphorylate Erk and eNOS in LECs. Western blot analysis showed that phosphorylated Erk (p‐Erk) and phosphorylated eNOS (p‐eNOS) expression was greater in the VEGF‐C– or ADRC‐CM–treated LECs than in control nontreated LECs. E, Cultured with growth factors, the expression of podoplanin mRNA was greater than that of control. Immunocytochemistry also revealed that cultured ADRCs were stained with LEC marker.
Vegf C, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/vegfc/pm28627412-24-18-24?v=Proteintech
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
vegf c - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Addgene inc michael grusch
The ability of ADRCs for lymphangiogenesis in vitro (functional assay and differentiation assay). A, Enzyme‐linked <t>immunosorbent</t> assay (ELISA) revealed that the concentration of VEGF‐C was upregulated in ADRC‐CM compared to control. B, rhVEGF‐C induced LEC migration in a dose‐dependent manner, and ADRC‐CM also induced LEC migration. HPF indicates high‐powered field. * P <0.05 vs nontreated control cells. C, Proliferation assay also revealed that ADRC‐CM promoted LEC proliferation, but VEGF‐C did not. * P <0.05, ** P <0.01 vs control. D, Western blot analysis revealed that ADRC‐CM, as well as VEGF‐C, had an ability to phosphorylate Erk and eNOS in LECs. Western blot analysis showed that phosphorylated Erk (p‐Erk) and phosphorylated eNOS (p‐eNOS) expression was greater in the VEGF‐C– or ADRC‐CM–treated LECs than in control nontreated LECs. E, Cultured with growth factors, the expression of podoplanin mRNA was greater than that of control. Immunocytochemistry also revealed that cultured ADRCs were stained with LEC marker.
Michael Grusch, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/vegfc/pmc12774322-31-26-28?v=Addgene+inc
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
michael grusch - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
ProSci Incorporated recombinant human vegfc
Figure 6 Effects of IFNTor IFNA on ISG15, <t>VEGFC,</t> and VEGFR3 mRNA expression in LyECs and LECs. IFNT stimulated mRNA expression of ISG15 and VEGFC but not VEGFR3 in LyECs (A–C). IFNT also stimulated ISG15 and VEGFC mRNA expression in LECs (D and E). In contrast, IFNA stimulated ISG15 mRNA expression (F) but tended to decrease VEGFC mRNA expression in LyECs (G). IFNA had no effect on VEGFR3 mRNA expression (H). In LECs, IFNA stimulated ISG15 mRNA expression but not VEGFC mRNA expression (I and J). White bars indicate the control group (no treatment), while black bars indicate 0.6–60 IU/ml IFNT-treated or IFNA-treated groups. All values are shown as meanGS.E.M. (nZ4/group). *Significant differences (P!0.05) and #tendency to difference (P!0.1) as determined by ANOVA followed by Fisher’s multiple comparison test.
Recombinant Human Vegfc, supplied by ProSci Incorporated, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/vegfc/10__1530_slash_rep___11___0157-146-37-43?v=ProSci+Incorporated
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
recombinant human vegfc - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
OriGene rabbit anti human vegf c polyclonal antibody
Figure 6 Effects of IFNTor IFNA on ISG15, <t>VEGFC,</t> and VEGFR3 mRNA expression in LyECs and LECs. IFNT stimulated mRNA expression of ISG15 and VEGFC but not VEGFR3 in LyECs (A–C). IFNT also stimulated ISG15 and VEGFC mRNA expression in LECs (D and E). In contrast, IFNA stimulated ISG15 mRNA expression (F) but tended to decrease VEGFC mRNA expression in LyECs (G). IFNA had no effect on VEGFR3 mRNA expression (H). In LECs, IFNA stimulated ISG15 mRNA expression but not VEGFC mRNA expression (I and J). White bars indicate the control group (no treatment), while black bars indicate 0.6–60 IU/ml IFNT-treated or IFNA-treated groups. All values are shown as meanGS.E.M. (nZ4/group). *Significant differences (P!0.05) and #tendency to difference (P!0.1) as determined by ANOVA followed by Fisher’s multiple comparison test.
Rabbit Anti Human Vegf C Polyclonal Antibody, supplied by OriGene, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/vegfc/pm26917449-63-83-89?v=OriGene
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rabbit anti human vegf c polyclonal antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
OriGene pcmv vegf c expression plasmid
Figure 6 Effects of IFNTor IFNA on ISG15, <t>VEGFC,</t> and VEGFR3 mRNA expression in LyECs and LECs. IFNT stimulated mRNA expression of ISG15 and VEGFC but not VEGFR3 in LyECs (A–C). IFNT also stimulated ISG15 and VEGFC mRNA expression in LECs (D and E). In contrast, IFNA stimulated ISG15 mRNA expression (F) but tended to decrease VEGFC mRNA expression in LyECs (G). IFNA had no effect on VEGFR3 mRNA expression (H). In LECs, IFNA stimulated ISG15 mRNA expression but not VEGFC mRNA expression (I and J). White bars indicate the control group (no treatment), while black bars indicate 0.6–60 IU/ml IFNT-treated or IFNA-treated groups. All values are shown as meanGS.E.M. (nZ4/group). *Significant differences (P!0.05) and #tendency to difference (P!0.1) as determined by ANOVA followed by Fisher’s multiple comparison test.
Pcmv Vegf C Expression Plasmid, supplied by OriGene, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/vegfc/pmc03888194-258-1-7?v=OriGene
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
pcmv vegf c expression plasmid - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
OriGene anti vegf c monoclonal antibodies
Figure 6 Effects of IFNTor IFNA on ISG15, <t>VEGFC,</t> and VEGFR3 mRNA expression in LyECs and LECs. IFNT stimulated mRNA expression of ISG15 and VEGFC but not VEGFR3 in LyECs (A–C). IFNT also stimulated ISG15 and VEGFC mRNA expression in LECs (D and E). In contrast, IFNA stimulated ISG15 mRNA expression (F) but tended to decrease VEGFC mRNA expression in LyECs (G). IFNA had no effect on VEGFR3 mRNA expression (H). In LECs, IFNA stimulated ISG15 mRNA expression but not VEGFC mRNA expression (I and J). White bars indicate the control group (no treatment), while black bars indicate 0.6–60 IU/ml IFNT-treated or IFNA-treated groups. All values are shown as meanGS.E.M. (nZ4/group). *Significant differences (P!0.05) and #tendency to difference (P!0.1) as determined by ANOVA followed by Fisher’s multiple comparison test.
Anti Vegf C Monoclonal Antibodies, supplied by OriGene, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/vegfc/pm22429345-37-27-30?v=OriGene
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti vegf c monoclonal antibodies - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

88
Biorbyt rabbit anti vegf c
Figure 6 Effects of IFNTor IFNA on ISG15, <t>VEGFC,</t> and VEGFR3 mRNA expression in LyECs and LECs. IFNT stimulated mRNA expression of ISG15 and VEGFC but not VEGFR3 in LyECs (A–C). IFNT also stimulated ISG15 and VEGFC mRNA expression in LECs (D and E). In contrast, IFNA stimulated ISG15 mRNA expression (F) but tended to decrease VEGFC mRNA expression in LyECs (G). IFNA had no effect on VEGFR3 mRNA expression (H). In LECs, IFNA stimulated ISG15 mRNA expression but not VEGFC mRNA expression (I and J). White bars indicate the control group (no treatment), while black bars indicate 0.6–60 IU/ml IFNT-treated or IFNA-treated groups. All values are shown as meanGS.E.M. (nZ4/group). *Significant differences (P!0.05) and #tendency to difference (P!0.1) as determined by ANOVA followed by Fisher’s multiple comparison test.
Rabbit Anti Vegf C, supplied by Biorbyt, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 88/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/vegfc/pm39779741-205-73-81?v=Biorbyt
Average 88 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rabbit anti vegf c - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
88/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
OriGene si rna transfection vegf c shrna
Figure 6 Effects of IFNTor IFNA on ISG15, <t>VEGFC,</t> and VEGFR3 mRNA expression in LyECs and LECs. IFNT stimulated mRNA expression of ISG15 and VEGFC but not VEGFR3 in LyECs (A–C). IFNT also stimulated ISG15 and VEGFC mRNA expression in LECs (D and E). In contrast, IFNA stimulated ISG15 mRNA expression (F) but tended to decrease VEGFC mRNA expression in LyECs (G). IFNA had no effect on VEGFR3 mRNA expression (H). In LECs, IFNA stimulated ISG15 mRNA expression but not VEGFC mRNA expression (I and J). White bars indicate the control group (no treatment), while black bars indicate 0.6–60 IU/ml IFNT-treated or IFNA-treated groups. All values are shown as meanGS.E.M. (nZ4/group). *Significant differences (P!0.05) and #tendency to difference (P!0.1) as determined by ANOVA followed by Fisher’s multiple comparison test.
Si Rna Transfection Vegf C Shrna, supplied by OriGene, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/vegfc/pm22911748-220-50-54?v=OriGene
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
si rna transfection vegf c shrna - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Single cell RNA sequencing of VEGFR family in tanycytes. ( A ) On the left: Schematic of the ME representing its privileged localisation in the hypothalamus. On the right: Correlation between tanycyte subtypes and their corresponding hypothalamic nuclei. Tanycytes are color coded according to the UMAP in B. ( B ) UMAP showing clusters representative of four main tanycytic subpopulations generated by the reanalysis of scRNA-seq ME dataset from [18]. ( C ) Feature plots showing VEGFRs (Kdr, Flt1 and Flt4), ligands (Vegfa, Vegfb and Vegfc) and co-receptors (Nrp1 and Nrp2) in tanycytic subclusters. ( D ) Dot plot showing the expression of the different members of the family across the tanycytic subclusters

Journal: Fluids and Barriers of the CNS

Article Title: Compartmentalized VEGF receptor expression in hypothalamic tanycytes reveals a novel non-endothelial axis of VEGF signaling

doi: 10.1186/s12987-026-00774-w

Figure Lengend Snippet: Single cell RNA sequencing of VEGFR family in tanycytes. ( A ) On the left: Schematic of the ME representing its privileged localisation in the hypothalamus. On the right: Correlation between tanycyte subtypes and their corresponding hypothalamic nuclei. Tanycytes are color coded according to the UMAP in B. ( B ) UMAP showing clusters representative of four main tanycytic subpopulations generated by the reanalysis of scRNA-seq ME dataset from [18]. ( C ) Feature plots showing VEGFRs (Kdr, Flt1 and Flt4), ligands (Vegfa, Vegfb and Vegfc) and co-receptors (Nrp1 and Nrp2) in tanycytic subclusters. ( D ) Dot plot showing the expression of the different members of the family across the tanycytic subclusters

Article Snippet: VEGFc , Mm00437310_m1.

Techniques: Single Cell, RNA Sequencing, Generated, Expressing

Quantification of Vegfr1, Vegfr2 and Vegfa during postnatal development. ( A ) qPCR analysis of Vegfr1, Vegfr2, and Vegfr3 mRNA expression levels in tanycytes isolated from male mice aged 3, 6, 9, 12, and 18 months. Notably, Vegfr2 expression shows a progressive decline with age, while Vegfr1 and Vegfr3 remain stable. ( B ) qPCR analysis of VEGFR ligands. Vegfa and Vegfc remain relatively stable across age, while Vegfb shows a modest upregulation in older mice. ( C ) Expression of VEGF co-receptors Nrp1 and Nrp2 in sorted tanycytes. While Nrp1 remains unchanged, Nrp2 expression declines with age, paralleling the pattern of Vegfr2. qPCR data are normalized to housekeeping genes 18S and Actb, and presented as mean ± SEM; n = 5–6 mice per time point. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA with Fisher’s LSD post hoc test. p < 0.05 was considered significant

Journal: Fluids and Barriers of the CNS

Article Title: Compartmentalized VEGF receptor expression in hypothalamic tanycytes reveals a novel non-endothelial axis of VEGF signaling

doi: 10.1186/s12987-026-00774-w

Figure Lengend Snippet: Quantification of Vegfr1, Vegfr2 and Vegfa during postnatal development. ( A ) qPCR analysis of Vegfr1, Vegfr2, and Vegfr3 mRNA expression levels in tanycytes isolated from male mice aged 3, 6, 9, 12, and 18 months. Notably, Vegfr2 expression shows a progressive decline with age, while Vegfr1 and Vegfr3 remain stable. ( B ) qPCR analysis of VEGFR ligands. Vegfa and Vegfc remain relatively stable across age, while Vegfb shows a modest upregulation in older mice. ( C ) Expression of VEGF co-receptors Nrp1 and Nrp2 in sorted tanycytes. While Nrp1 remains unchanged, Nrp2 expression declines with age, paralleling the pattern of Vegfr2. qPCR data are normalized to housekeeping genes 18S and Actb, and presented as mean ± SEM; n = 5–6 mice per time point. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA with Fisher’s LSD post hoc test. p < 0.05 was considered significant

Article Snippet: VEGFc , Mm00437310_m1.

Techniques: Expressing, Isolation

The ability of ADRCs for lymphangiogenesis in vitro (functional assay and differentiation assay). A, Enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) revealed that the concentration of VEGF‐C was upregulated in ADRC‐CM compared to control. B, rhVEGF‐C induced LEC migration in a dose‐dependent manner, and ADRC‐CM also induced LEC migration. HPF indicates high‐powered field. * P <0.05 vs nontreated control cells. C, Proliferation assay also revealed that ADRC‐CM promoted LEC proliferation, but VEGF‐C did not. * P <0.05, ** P <0.01 vs control. D, Western blot analysis revealed that ADRC‐CM, as well as VEGF‐C, had an ability to phosphorylate Erk and eNOS in LECs. Western blot analysis showed that phosphorylated Erk (p‐Erk) and phosphorylated eNOS (p‐eNOS) expression was greater in the VEGF‐C– or ADRC‐CM–treated LECs than in control nontreated LECs. E, Cultured with growth factors, the expression of podoplanin mRNA was greater than that of control. Immunocytochemistry also revealed that cultured ADRCs were stained with LEC marker.

Journal: Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease

Article Title: Therapeutic Lymphangiogenesis With Implantation of Adipose‐Derived Regenerative Cells

doi: 10.1161/JAHA.112.000877

Figure Lengend Snippet: The ability of ADRCs for lymphangiogenesis in vitro (functional assay and differentiation assay). A, Enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) revealed that the concentration of VEGF‐C was upregulated in ADRC‐CM compared to control. B, rhVEGF‐C induced LEC migration in a dose‐dependent manner, and ADRC‐CM also induced LEC migration. HPF indicates high‐powered field. * P <0.05 vs nontreated control cells. C, Proliferation assay also revealed that ADRC‐CM promoted LEC proliferation, but VEGF‐C did not. * P <0.05, ** P <0.01 vs control. D, Western blot analysis revealed that ADRC‐CM, as well as VEGF‐C, had an ability to phosphorylate Erk and eNOS in LECs. Western blot analysis showed that phosphorylated Erk (p‐Erk) and phosphorylated eNOS (p‐eNOS) expression was greater in the VEGF‐C– or ADRC‐CM–treated LECs than in control nontreated LECs. E, Cultured with growth factors, the expression of podoplanin mRNA was greater than that of control. Immunocytochemistry also revealed that cultured ADRCs were stained with LEC marker.

Article Snippet: Concentrations of VEGF‐C proteins in the media were determined by a mouse VEGF‐C enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay kit (Cusabio Biotech Co, Ltd) according to the manufacturer's instructions.

Techniques: In Vitro, Functional Assay, Differentiation Assay, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Concentration Assay, Control, Migration, Proliferation Assay, Western Blot, Expressing, Cell Culture, Immunocytochemistry, Staining, Marker

Figure 6 Effects of IFNTor IFNA on ISG15, VEGFC, and VEGFR3 mRNA expression in LyECs and LECs. IFNT stimulated mRNA expression of ISG15 and VEGFC but not VEGFR3 in LyECs (A–C). IFNT also stimulated ISG15 and VEGFC mRNA expression in LECs (D and E). In contrast, IFNA stimulated ISG15 mRNA expression (F) but tended to decrease VEGFC mRNA expression in LyECs (G). IFNA had no effect on VEGFR3 mRNA expression (H). In LECs, IFNA stimulated ISG15 mRNA expression but not VEGFC mRNA expression (I and J). White bars indicate the control group (no treatment), while black bars indicate 0.6–60 IU/ml IFNT-treated or IFNA-treated groups. All values are shown as meanGS.E.M. (nZ4/group). *Significant differences (P!0.05) and #tendency to difference (P!0.1) as determined by ANOVA followed by Fisher’s multiple comparison test.

Journal: REPRODUCTION

Article Title: Possible involvement of IFNT in lymphangiogenesis in the corpus luteum during the maternal recognition period in the cow

doi: 10.1530/rep-11-0157

Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 6 Effects of IFNTor IFNA on ISG15, VEGFC, and VEGFR3 mRNA expression in LyECs and LECs. IFNT stimulated mRNA expression of ISG15 and VEGFC but not VEGFR3 in LyECs (A–C). IFNT also stimulated ISG15 and VEGFC mRNA expression in LECs (D and E). In contrast, IFNA stimulated ISG15 mRNA expression (F) but tended to decrease VEGFC mRNA expression in LyECs (G). IFNA had no effect on VEGFR3 mRNA expression (H). In LECs, IFNA stimulated ISG15 mRNA expression but not VEGFC mRNA expression (I and J). White bars indicate the control group (no treatment), while black bars indicate 0.6–60 IU/ml IFNT-treated or IFNA-treated groups. All values are shown as meanGS.E.M. (nZ4/group). *Significant differences (P!0.05) and #tendency to difference (P!0.1) as determined by ANOVA followed by Fisher’s multiple comparison test.

Article Snippet: Inc. (Otsu, Japan); 4% Block Ace Powder was purchased from DS Pharma Biomedical (Osaka, Japan); anti-mouse-LYVE1 rabbit polyclonal antibody was purchased from Abcam (Cambridge, UK); BD Matrigel basement membrane was purchased from BD Biosciences (Bedford, MA, USA); recombinant human VEGFC was purchased from ProSci (Poway, CA, USA); protease inhibitor cocktail was purchased from Roche; 70 mm filter (Cell Straner, REF 352350) was purchased from BD Falcon (Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA); PVDF membranes were purchased from Bio-Rad Laboratories; lymphoprep was purchased from AxisShield (Oslo, Norway); HRP-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG antibodies were purchased from GE Healthcare Ltd (Chalfont St Giles, UK); HRP-conjugated anti-mouse IgG antibodies were purchased from Rockland Immunochemicals, Inc. (Gilbertsville, PA, USA); anti-human VWF rabbit polyclonal antibody (clone A0082) was purchased from Dako Denmark A/S (Glostrup, Denmark); biotinylated goat anti-rabbit BA-1000 IgG and avidin–biotin reagent (PK-6100, Vectastain ABC kit) were purchased from Vector Laboratories, Inc. (Burlingame, CA, USA); recombinant bovine IFN was produced by Escherichia coli.

Techniques: Expressing, Control, Comparison

Figure 7 Effects of IFNT on proliferation of LyECs and capillary-like tube formation. IFNT stimulated the proliferation of LyECs (A) and promoted the capillary-like tube formation of LyECs as well as 100 ng/ml VEGFC (B). Panels C, D and E show typical images of capillary-like tube formation in matrigel assays on LyECs. All values are shown as meanGS.E.M. (nZ4/group). The scale bars rep- resent 500 mm. *, **Significant differences (P!0.05 or P!0.01) and #tendency to difference (P!0.1) as determined by ANOVA followed by Fisher’s multiple comparison test.

Journal: REPRODUCTION

Article Title: Possible involvement of IFNT in lymphangiogenesis in the corpus luteum during the maternal recognition period in the cow

doi: 10.1530/rep-11-0157

Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 7 Effects of IFNT on proliferation of LyECs and capillary-like tube formation. IFNT stimulated the proliferation of LyECs (A) and promoted the capillary-like tube formation of LyECs as well as 100 ng/ml VEGFC (B). Panels C, D and E show typical images of capillary-like tube formation in matrigel assays on LyECs. All values are shown as meanGS.E.M. (nZ4/group). The scale bars rep- resent 500 mm. *, **Significant differences (P!0.05 or P!0.01) and #tendency to difference (P!0.1) as determined by ANOVA followed by Fisher’s multiple comparison test.

Article Snippet: Inc. (Otsu, Japan); 4% Block Ace Powder was purchased from DS Pharma Biomedical (Osaka, Japan); anti-mouse-LYVE1 rabbit polyclonal antibody was purchased from Abcam (Cambridge, UK); BD Matrigel basement membrane was purchased from BD Biosciences (Bedford, MA, USA); recombinant human VEGFC was purchased from ProSci (Poway, CA, USA); protease inhibitor cocktail was purchased from Roche; 70 mm filter (Cell Straner, REF 352350) was purchased from BD Falcon (Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA); PVDF membranes were purchased from Bio-Rad Laboratories; lymphoprep was purchased from AxisShield (Oslo, Norway); HRP-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG antibodies were purchased from GE Healthcare Ltd (Chalfont St Giles, UK); HRP-conjugated anti-mouse IgG antibodies were purchased from Rockland Immunochemicals, Inc. (Gilbertsville, PA, USA); anti-human VWF rabbit polyclonal antibody (clone A0082) was purchased from Dako Denmark A/S (Glostrup, Denmark); biotinylated goat anti-rabbit BA-1000 IgG and avidin–biotin reagent (PK-6100, Vectastain ABC kit) were purchased from Vector Laboratories, Inc. (Burlingame, CA, USA); recombinant bovine IFN was produced by Escherichia coli.

Techniques: Comparison