|
Novus Biologicals
polyclonal rabbit anti sox2 Polyclonal Rabbit Anti Sox2, supplied by Novus Biologicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/product/sox2/SOX2+Antibody+-+BSA+Free/pm28414315-610-60-63 Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
polyclonal rabbit anti sox2 - by Bioz Stars,
2026-10
93/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
R&D Systems
antibodies anti sox2 ![]() Antibodies Anti Sox2, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/product/sox2/Human%2FMouse%2FRat+SOX2+Antibody/pmc07694414-97-12-18 Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
antibodies anti sox2 - by Bioz Stars,
2026-10
93/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
R&D Systems
sox2 pe mouse igg2a ![]() Sox2 Pe Mouse Igg2a, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/product/sox2/SOX2+Antibody+(245610R)+%5BPE%5D/pmc06258721-80-5-8 Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
sox2 pe mouse igg2a - by Bioz Stars,
2026-10
96/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
R&D Systems
sox2 ![]() Sox2, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 98/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/product/sox2/Human%2FMouse%2FRat+SOX2+Antibody/pm37418588-77-40-41 Average 98 stars, based on 1 article reviews
sox2 - by Bioz Stars,
2026-10
98/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
OriGene
sox2 ![]() Sox2, supplied by OriGene, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/product/sox2/SOX2+Rabbit+Polyclonal+Antibody/pmc04157576__mmc4-437-86-88 Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
sox2 - by Bioz Stars,
2026-10
90/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
R&D Systems
npc ![]() Npc, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/product/sox2/Human%2FMouse%2FRat+SOX2+Antibody/pm37843228-71-58-61 Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
npc - by Bioz Stars,
2026-10
96/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
R&D Systems
anti sox2 ![]() Anti Sox2, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/product/sox2/SOX2+Antibody+(SOX2%2F1791)/pmc08530440-46-40-48 Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti sox2 - by Bioz Stars,
2026-10
94/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Danaher Inc
mouse monoclonal antibody ![]() Mouse Monoclonal Antibody, supplied by Danaher Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/product/sox2/mouse+monoclonal+Anti-SOX2+antibody/pmc10570842-82-13-25 Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mouse monoclonal antibody - by Bioz Stars,
2026-10
99/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Cell Signaling Technology Inc
rabbit anti sox2 monoclonal antibody ![]() Rabbit Anti Sox2 Monoclonal Antibody, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/product/sox2/Sox2+Rabbit+mAb/pmc10854781-58-1-5 Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rabbit anti sox2 monoclonal antibody - by Bioz Stars,
2026-10
94/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Cell Signaling Technology Inc
rabbit anti sox2 ![]() Rabbit Anti Sox2, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/product/sox2/Sox2+Rabbit+mAb/pmc12070373-7-0-4 Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rabbit anti sox2 - by Bioz Stars,
2026-10
96/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Cell Signaling Technology Inc
anti sox2 ![]() Anti Sox2, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/product/sox2/Sox2+XP+Rabbit+mAb/pmc13045311-290-44-46 Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti sox2 - by Bioz Stars,
2026-10
96/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
Image Search Results
Journal: Stem Cell Research & Therapy
Article Title: Investigation of de novo mutations in a schizophrenia case-parent trio by induced pluripotent stem cell-based in vitro disease modeling: convergence of schizophrenia- and autism-related cellular phenotypes
doi: 10.1186/s13287-020-01980-5
Figure Lengend Snippet: Establishment and molecular characterization of NPC lines and mature neuronal cultures. Investigation of target genes KHSRP and LRRC7. a Changes in gene expression patterns in NPCs and neurons derived from the case-parent trio. b , c NPCs and neurons derived from hiPSCs by the hippocampal neuronal differentiation protocol were investigated by immunofluorescence staining and visualized by confocal fluorescent microscopy. Immunocytochemical staining shows Nestin/Sox2 ( b ) and Map 2/Prox1 ( c ) positivity in these established neural cell types. Scale bars = 100 μm. d , e Immunofluorescence staining for KHSRP and LRRC7 in neurons. KHSRP ( d ) shows nuclear and cytoplasmic localization, while LRRC7 ( e ) localized postsynaptically in neurons. Scale bars = 50 μm
Article Snippet: The samples were then incubated for 1 h at room temperature with
Techniques: Gene Expression, Derivative Assay, Immunofluorescence, Staining, Microscopy
Journal: Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
Article Title: Transdifferentiating Astrocytes Into Neurons Using ASCL1 Functionalized With a Novel Intracellular Protein Delivery Technology
doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2018.00173
Figure Lengend Snippet: Small molecule only group after 2 days of priming by LDN193189 and SB431542 followed by 10 days of treatment with DAPT. (A) Cells express the early neural marker TUJ1 and weakly express the neural stem cell marker SOX2. Scale bar is 100 μm. (B) High magnification of (A) . Scale bar is 30 μm. (C) Cells are negative for the mature neural marker MAP2. Scale bar is 100 μm. (D) High magnification of (C) . Scale bar is 10 μm (E) Cells are negative for the mature neural marker NEUN and the neurotransmitter glutamate expressed by excitatory interneurons GLUT. Scale bar is 100 μm. (F) High magnification of (E) . Scale bar is 20 μm. (G) Cells are negative for the neurotransmitter tyrosine hydroxylase expressed by dopaminergic neurons TH, the neurotransmitter glutamic acid decarboxylase expressed by inhibitory interneurons GAD65/67, and the neurotransmitter choline acetyltransferase expressed by motor neurons CHAT. Scale bar is 100 μm. (H) High magnification of (G) . Scale bar is 30 μm. Note that some fluorescence is picked up by all the cells producing background fluorescence which can be ignored.
Article Snippet: The cells were stained for
Techniques: Marker, Fluorescence
Journal: Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
Article Title: Transdifferentiating Astrocytes Into Neurons Using ASCL1 Functionalized With a Novel Intracellular Protein Delivery Technology
doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2018.00173
Figure Lengend Snippet: Plastic astrocytes generate neurospheres and mature neurons after 12 days of exposure to ASCL1-IPTD, including 2 days of priming by LDN193189 and SB431542 followed by 10 days of DAPT. (A) Cells express the early neural marker TUJ1 and the neural stem cell marker SOX2. Scale bar is 100 μm. (B) High magnification of (A) . Scale bar is 30 μm. (C) Cells express the mature neural marker MAP2. Scale bar is 100 μm. (D) High magnification of (C) . Scale bar is 30 μm (E) Cells express the mature neural marker NEUN and the neurotransmitter glutamate expressed by excitatory interneurons GLUT. Scale bar is 100 μm. (F) High magnification of (E) . Scale bar is 30 μm. (G) Cells are negative for the neurotransmitter tyrosine hydroxylase expressed by dopaminergic neurons TH, and negative for the neurotransmitter choline acetyltransferase expressed by motor neurons CHAT, but do express the neurotransmitter glutamic acid decarboxylase expressed by inhibitory interneurons GAD65/67. Scale bar is 100 μm. (H) High magnification of (G) . Scale bar is 30μm. Note that some fluorescence is picked up by all the cells producing background fluorescence which can be ignored.
Article Snippet: The cells were stained for
Techniques: Marker, Fluorescence
Journal: Molecular oncology
Article Title: SETD2 loss in renal epithelial cells drives epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in a TGF-β-independent manner.
doi: 10.1002/1878-0261.13487
Figure Lengend Snippet: Fig. 7. SOX2, OCT2, and PRRX1 are downstream effectors of the SETD2-regulated EMT program. (A) Expression of SOX2, OCT2, and PRRX1 in TGF-b-treated WT (72 h), SETD2 KO, and SETD2 rescue tested by RT-qPCR (run in triplicate). (B) Migration capacity by wound healing assay, (C) invasiveness by transwell assay, and (D) stemness by 3D spheroid formation assay in RPTEC WT GFP (control vector), SETD2 KO1 and KO2, and SOX2/OCT2/PRRX1-transduced WT RPTEC lines. Images are taken at 49 magnification, scale bar: 1000 lm for (B) and (D) and at 2.59 magnification, scale bar: 1200 lm for (C). Data are represented as mean SEM for triplicate reactions for B–D. P-value is calculated by one-way ANOVA in (A), (B), and (D). Two-way ANOVA is used for statistical test for (C). ****P < 0.0001; ***P < 0.001; **P < 0.01; *P < 0.05; ns, P ≥0.05. (E) Model of the SETD2 loss-driven EMT program through cell intrinsic (transcriptional) and cell extrinsic (paracrine) mechanisms.
Article Snippet: See the T erm s and C onditions (https://onlinelibrary.w iley.com /term s-and-conditions) on W iley O nline L ibrary for rules of use; O A articles are governed by the applicable C reative C om m ons L icense #ab1791),
Techniques: Expressing, Quantitative RT-PCR, Migration, Wound Healing Assay, Transwell Assay, Tube Formation Assay, Control, Plasmid Preparation
Journal: Neural regeneration research
Article Title: Multiple factors to assist human-derived induced pluripotent stem cells to efficiently differentiate into midbrain dopaminergic neurons.
doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.378203
Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 2 | The modified dual SMAD pathway inhibition protocol yielded a low proportion of dopaminergic neurons. (A) Representative images of human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSC) with immunostaining of pluripotency markers, octamer-binding transcription factor 4 (OCT4) and stage-specific embryonic antigen-4 (SSEA4). Scale bars: 50 μm. (B) Representative images of neural precursor cells (NPC) induced from hiPSC with immunostaining of SRY-box transcription factor 2 (SOX2) and Nestin. Scale bars: 50 μm. (C) Representative images of hiPSC-derived neurons with immunostaining of microtubule- associated protein 2 (MAP2) (green) and human nuclei (HuNu) antibody (red). Scale bars: 50 μm. (D) Analysis of neuronal differentiation efficiency (number of cells expressing HuNu: n = 443 cells in dual SMAD pathway inhibition protocol). (E) Representative images of hiPSC-derived neurons with immunostaining of markers for different neuronal subtypes: tyrosine hydroxylase (TH), gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA), vesicular glutamate transporter 1 (VGLUT1) (all in green), and MAP2 (red) grown on mouse astrocytes. Scale bars: 50 μm. (F) Differentiation ratio of dopaminergic neurons, GABAergic neurons, and glutamatergic neurons were assessed based on the proportion of TH, GABA, and VGLUT1 positive cells among MAP2 positive cells, respectively. At least three independent replicates were performed of each experiment. SMAD: Suppressor of mother against decapentaplegic.
Article Snippet: Primary antibodies included: octamer-binding transcription factor 4 (OCT4), a marker used for the identification of iPSC (rabbit, 1:100, BioVision, Milpitas, CA, USA, Cat# 6765-100, RRID: AB_2936816), stage-specific embryonic antigen-4 (SSEA4), a marker used for identification of iPSC (mouse, 1:100, Invitrogen, Rockford, AL, USA, Cat# 41-4000, RRID: AB_2533506), SRY-box transcription factor 2 (SOX2), a marker used for identification of
Techniques: Modification, Inhibition, Immunostaining, Binding Assay, Derivative Assay, Expressing
Journal: Neural regeneration research
Article Title: Multiple factors to assist human-derived induced pluripotent stem cells to efficiently differentiate into midbrain dopaminergic neurons.
doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.378203
Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 4 | The SHH + FGF8 differentiation protocol yielded a high proportion of dopaminergic neurons, with a small fraction of neurons that expressed FOXA2, a marker of midbrain dopaminergic neurons. (A) Representative images of neural precursor cells (NPC) induced from human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSC) with immunostaining of Forkhead box protein A2 (FOXA2) and SRY-box transcription factor 2 (SOX2). Scale bars: 50 μm. (B) Representative images of hiPSC-derived neurons in the SHH + FGF8 protocol with immunostaining of microtubule- associated protein 2 (MAP2) (green) and human nuclei (HuNu) antibody (red). Scale bars: 50 μm. (C) Comparison of the differentiation efficiency of neurons in the SHH + FGF8 protocol and modified dual SMAD pathway inhibition protocol (number of cells expressing HuNu: n = 607 cells in SHH+FGF8 protocol, n = 443 cells in dual SMAD pathway inhibition protocol). (D) Representative images of hiPSC-derived neurons in the SHH + FGF8 protocol with immunostaining of tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) (green) and MAP2 (red). Scale bars: 50 μm. (E) The proportion of dopaminergic neurons in the SHH + FGF8 protocol and modified dual SMAD pathway inhibition protocol was determined by calculating the percentage of TH-positive cells in MAP2-positive cells. (number of cells expressing MAP2: n = 581 cells in SHH + FGF8 protocol, n = 339 cells in dual SMAD pathway inhibition protocol). (F) The white box area in the image is enlarged and displayed on the right. NPC were infected with a DAT-Cherry lentivirus and then cultured on a glial cell feeder layer to label dopaminergic neurons in the later differentiation stage. Representative images of hiPSC-derived neurons in the SHH + FGF8 protocol with immunostaining of TH (green) and beta III tubulin (TUJ1) (white) on day 33. Scale bars: 50 μm (left), 10 μm (right). (G) The white box area in the image is enlarged and displayed at the bottom. Immunofluorescence staining of FOXA2 (red) and TH (green). Scale bars: 20 μm (upper panels), 5 μm (lower panels). At least three independent replicates were performed for each experiment. Data are presented as mean ± SEM, ****P < 0.0001. Statistical significance was evaluated by two-tailed unpaired Student’s t-test (C, E). FGF8: Fibroblast growth factor 8; ns: not significant; SHH: Sonic Hedgehog; TH: tyrosine hydroxylase.
Article Snippet: Primary antibodies included: octamer-binding transcription factor 4 (OCT4), a marker used for the identification of iPSC (rabbit, 1:100, BioVision, Milpitas, CA, USA, Cat# 6765-100, RRID: AB_2936816), stage-specific embryonic antigen-4 (SSEA4), a marker used for identification of iPSC (mouse, 1:100, Invitrogen, Rockford, AL, USA, Cat# 41-4000, RRID: AB_2533506), SRY-box transcription factor 2 (SOX2), a marker used for identification of
Techniques: Marker, Immunostaining, Derivative Assay, Comparison, Modification, Inhibition, Expressing, Infection, Cell Culture, Immunofluorescence, Staining, Two Tailed Test
Journal: Cells
Article Title: SOX2 Expression Does Not Guarantee Cancer Stem Cell-like Characteristics in Lung Adenocarcinoma
doi: 10.3390/cells13030216
Figure Lengend Snippet: Inter- and intra-cellular heterogeneity in Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) cell lines regarding SOX2 expression. ( A ) SOX2 mRNA expression in LUAD cells. Semi-quantitative RT-PCR was conducted to analyze the mRNA expression of SOX2 and ACTB (β-actin) using total RNA extracted from LUAD cells A549, H23, and H358. NCCIT, an embryonic carcinoma cell line, was used as a positive control. ( B ) SOX2 protein expression in LUAD cells. The antibodies mentioned were employed in Western blotting, with β-actin serving as a loading control. ( C ) Flow cytometry (FACSVerse) was utilized to assess SOX2 protein expression in individual LUAD cells, employing an anti-SOX2 antibody and secondary goat anti-rabbit Alexa 488. A Rabbit IgG was used as a negative control. ( D ) Representative images of immunofluorescence staining with anti-SOX2 antibody in A549 and H358 cells. Nuclei stained with DAPI. Scale bar: 20 μm. ( E ) Quantification of SOX2-positive cells using immunostaining. Cells labeled with SOX2, exhibiting fluorescence intensity surpassing that of the highest controls, were considered as SOX2-positive cells. n = 50 for each sample.
Article Snippet: A
Techniques: Expressing, Quantitative RT-PCR, Positive Control, Western Blot, Control, Flow Cytometry, Negative Control, Immunofluorescence, Staining, Immunostaining, Labeling, Fluorescence
Journal: Cells
Article Title: SOX2 Expression Does Not Guarantee Cancer Stem Cell-like Characteristics in Lung Adenocarcinoma
doi: 10.3390/cells13030216
Figure Lengend Snippet: SOX2 knockout does not perturb the cell proliferation of LUAD. ( A ) A schematic representation illustrating the g SOX2 target site on SOX2 Exon1 for the generation of SOX2 knockout LUAD cell lines using the CRISPR/Cas9 system. ( B ) Immunoblots showing the SOX2 protein level in A549 and H358 cells stably expressing gMock or gSOX2. ( C ) Immunocytochemical analysis using anti-SOX2 antibody in Mock and SOX2 knockout LUAD cells. Scale bar: 20 μm. ( D ) No impact of SOX2 knockout on the cell proliferation of LUAD cells. Cellular proliferation was measured using sulforhodamine B (SRB) assays, and each value was presented as optical density at 515 nm (OD 515 ). ns, not significant. ( E ) No difference in the ability of a single cell to grow into a colony in LUAD SOX2 knockout cells. Representative images (left) and the quantification (right) of relative colony number in each sample are shown. The crystal violet staining was performed 7 days after seeding of A549 cells and 14 days for H358 cells. Values represent means ± SD from three independent experiments. ns, not significant.
Article Snippet: A
Techniques: Knock-Out, CRISPR, Western Blot, Stable Transfection, Expressing, Staining
Journal: Cells
Article Title: SOX2 Expression Does Not Guarantee Cancer Stem Cell-like Characteristics in Lung Adenocarcinoma
doi: 10.3390/cells13030216
Figure Lengend Snippet: SOX2 is not required for tumor sphere formation, invasion, and migration of certain LUAD cells. ( A ) No impact of SOX2 knockout on tumor sphere (TS) formation in LUAD cells. TS formation assays were conducted 14 days post-seeding using A549 and H358 cells stably expressing gMock or g SOX2 . Representative images (top) and the quantification of TS number (bottom) are shown. Results from each independent experiment (Experiment 1, 2 and 3) are presented as means ± SD (n = 3). ns, not significant. Scale bar: 100 μm. ( B , C ) No impact of SOX2 knockout on the migration and invasion of LUAD cells. Migration ( B ) and invasion ( C ) assays were carried out using Mock and SOX2 knockout A549 and H358 cells. Representative images (left) are shown, and the total number of migrated and invaded cells was normalized to that of gMock. Mean ± SD from three independent experiments are presented. Scale bar: 100 μm. ns, not significant.
Article Snippet: A
Techniques: Migration, Knock-Out, Stable Transfection, Expressing
Journal: Cells
Article Title: SOX2 Expression Does Not Guarantee Cancer Stem Cell-like Characteristics in Lung Adenocarcinoma
doi: 10.3390/cells13030216
Figure Lengend Snippet: shRNA−resistant SOX2 is unable to rescue impaired proliferation by sh SOX2 in LUAD. ( A ) A schematic showing the target site for SOX2 knockdown, with DNA sequence substitutions for shRNA-resistant SOX2 . The target site (red line) was used to generate Tet-inducible SOX2 knockdown (sh SOX2 ) in A549 and H358 cells. Red letters indicate three synonymous substitutions, reconstituting shRNA-resistant SOX2 in sh SOX2 cell lines (sh SOX2 /+ SOX2 ). ( B ) SOX2 knockdown and its reconstitution in sh SOX2 LUAD cell lines were assessed. Cells were treated with 1 μg/mL of doxycycline (Dox) for 4 days, and SOX2 protein level was accessed by Western blotting. shMock and shMock + Mock were used as negative controls. ( C , D ) Reduced cell survival caused by sh SOX2 is not restored by SOX2 reconstitution in LUAD cells. Clonogenic assays were conducted using indicated A549 and H358 cell lines. Representative images ( C ) and the quantification ( D ) are shown. The colony number of each sample was normalized to that of shMock without Dox. Mean ± SD from three independent experiments. ***, p < 0.001; ns, not significant. p values were compared with shMock without Dox.
Article Snippet: A
Techniques: shRNA, Knockdown, Sequencing, Western Blot
Journal: Cells
Article Title: SOX2 Expression Does Not Guarantee Cancer Stem Cell-like Characteristics in Lung Adenocarcinoma
doi: 10.3390/cells13030216
Figure Lengend Snippet: shRNA−resistant SOX2 is unable to rescue suppression of sphere formation, invasion, and migration observed in sh SOX2 LUAD cells. ( A , B ) The impaired sphere formation caused by sh SOX2 is not restored by the reconstitution of SOX2 in LUAD cells. ‘+’ Dox indicates that 1 μg/mL Dox was treated. Representative images (top) and the quantification of TS number (bottom) are shown. TS formation assays were conducted using shMock, sh SOX2 , sh SOX2 /+Mock, and sh SOX2 /+ SOX2 in A549 ( A ) and H358 ( B ) cells. Results from each independent experiment (Experiment 1,2 and 3) are presented as means ± SD (n = 3). ( C , D ) Reconstitution of SOX2 is unable to restore the reduced migration and invasion observed in sh SOX2 LUAD cells. Migration ( C ) and invasion ( D ) assays using indicated A549 with or without Dox treatment. Means ± SD from three independent experiments are presented. ***, p < 0.001; **, p < 0.01 when compared with the shMock without Dox; ns, not significant; TS, tumor sphere. Scale bar: 100 μm.
Article Snippet: A
Techniques: shRNA, Migration
Journal: Cells
Article Title: SOX2 Expression Does Not Guarantee Cancer Stem Cell-like Characteristics in Lung Adenocarcinoma
doi: 10.3390/cells13030216
Figure Lengend Snippet: SOX2 expression does not significantly affect cancer stem cell-like properties in certain LUAD cell lines. ( A , B ) Cellular response to chemotherapeutic drugs is not altered by SOX2 knockout in LUAD cells. Indicated concentrations of cisplatin ( A ) or paclitaxel ( B ) were treated for 72 h in A549 and H358 cells stably expressing gMock and g SOX2 . Cell viability was measured by SRB assay, and the values are presented as the mean ± SD from three independent experiments. ns, not significant.
Article Snippet: A
Techniques: Expressing, Knock-Out, Stable Transfection, Sulforhodamine B Assay
Journal: Cell reports
Article Title: Lineage-specific CDK activity dynamics characterize early mammalian development
doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2025.115558
Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Confocal images from representative ROSA26 DHB/H2B embryos. Scale bar, 20 μm. (B) Plot showing a quantification of CDK activity in individual SOX2 + or CDX2 + cells from ROSA26 DHB/H2B embryos (dots from the same column) staged based on the number of cells. Percentage of cells (in red) below the arbitrary threshold (−0.25) shown for embryos containing 0–100 cells and above 100 cells. N = 54 embryos. (C) Time-lapse microscopy experiment performed in two representative E3.5 ROSA26 DHB/H2B embryos. Note the embryonic (e)-abembryonic (a) axis. Scale bar, 30 μm. (D) Plots showing CDK activity in individual cells obtained from a representative E3.5 ROSA26 DHB/H2B embryo. The embryo was imaged, fixed, and stained for CDX2 and SOX2 (bottom; scale bar, 30 μm) to determine lineage identity at the endpoint. Highlighted tracks are in cyan and magenta. (E) Plot showing a quantification of CDK activity in individual cells obtained from a pool of E4.5 ROSA26 DHB/H2B embryos. Percentage of cells (in red) below the arbitrary threshold (−0.25). p values are from two-tailed unpaired t tests. **** p < 0.0001; N = 5 embryos. (F) Confocal images from E6.5 ROSA26 DHB/H2B embryos. Dashed line surrounds the EPI. Scale bar, 20 μm.
Article Snippet:
Techniques: Activity Assay, Time-lapse Microscopy, Staining, Two Tailed Test