Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Topical treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005028.pub3

Figure Lengend Snippet: Agrup 1981

Article Snippet: Methods DESIGN Within‐patient Participant delivery ALLOCATION Random Method of randomisation: randomised in blocks of 4 by the pharmacy department using 'Minitab' Concealment: unclear BLINDING Double‐blind (participant/investigator) WITHDRAWAL/DROPOUT Unclear Participants N: 24 Treatment duration: 12 wks; FU: 12 wks LF: 2 (8.3%) BC: yes Age: 47.5 (range = 28 to 78) Gender (per cent men): 75.0% Severity: TSS (0 to 24) = 17.0 (3.3SD, N = 22) INCLUSION CRITERIA Chronic plaque psoriasis.

Techniques: Ointment, Selection

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Topical treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005028.pub3

Figure Lengend Snippet: Baiocchi 1997

Article Snippet: Methods DESIGN Within‐patient Participant delivery ALLOCATION Random Method of randomisation: randomised in blocks of 4 by the pharmacy department using 'Minitab' Concealment: unclear BLINDING Double‐blind (participant/investigator) WITHDRAWAL/DROPOUT Unclear Participants N: 24 Treatment duration: 12 wks; FU: 12 wks LF: 2 (8.3%) BC: yes Age: 47.5 (range = 28 to 78) Gender (per cent men): 75.0% Severity: TSS (0 to 24) = 17.0 (3.3SD, N = 22) INCLUSION CRITERIA Chronic plaque psoriasis.

Techniques: Blocking Assay, Ointment, Selection

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Topical treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005028.pub3

Figure Lengend Snippet: Brown 2005

Article Snippet: Methods DESIGN Within‐patient Participant delivery ALLOCATION Random Method of randomisation: randomised in blocks of 4 by the pharmacy department using 'Minitab' Concealment: unclear BLINDING Double‐blind (participant/investigator) WITHDRAWAL/DROPOUT Unclear Participants N: 24 Treatment duration: 12 wks; FU: 12 wks LF: 2 (8.3%) BC: yes Age: 47.5 (range = 28 to 78) Gender (per cent men): 75.0% Severity: TSS (0 to 24) = 17.0 (3.3SD, N = 22) INCLUSION CRITERIA Chronic plaque psoriasis.

Techniques: Selection

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Topical treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005028.pub3

Figure Lengend Snippet: Buckley 1978

Article Snippet: Methods DESIGN Within‐patient Participant delivery ALLOCATION Random Method of randomisation: randomised in blocks of 4 by the pharmacy department using 'Minitab' Concealment: unclear BLINDING Double‐blind (participant/investigator) WITHDRAWAL/DROPOUT Unclear Participants N: 24 Treatment duration: 12 wks; FU: 12 wks LF: 2 (8.3%) BC: yes Age: 47.5 (range = 28 to 78) Gender (per cent men): 75.0% Severity: TSS (0 to 24) = 17.0 (3.3SD, N = 22) INCLUSION CRITERIA Chronic plaque psoriasis.

Techniques: Transformation Assay, Staining, Selection

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Topical treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005028.pub3

Figure Lengend Snippet: Cheesbrough 1992

Article Snippet: Methods DESIGN Within‐patient Participant delivery ALLOCATION Random Method of randomisation: randomised in blocks of 4 by the pharmacy department using 'Minitab' Concealment: unclear BLINDING Double‐blind (participant/investigator) WITHDRAWAL/DROPOUT Unclear Participants N: 24 Treatment duration: 12 wks; FU: 12 wks LF: 2 (8.3%) BC: yes Age: 47.5 (range = 28 to 78) Gender (per cent men): 75.0% Severity: TSS (0 to 24) = 17.0 (3.3SD, N = 22) INCLUSION CRITERIA Chronic plaque psoriasis.

Techniques: Selection

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Topical treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005028.pub3

Figure Lengend Snippet: Christensen 1999

Article Snippet: Methods DESIGN Within‐patient Participant delivery ALLOCATION Random Method of randomisation: randomised in blocks of 4 by the pharmacy department using 'Minitab' Concealment: unclear BLINDING Double‐blind (participant/investigator) WITHDRAWAL/DROPOUT Unclear Participants N: 24 Treatment duration: 12 wks; FU: 12 wks LF: 2 (8.3%) BC: yes Age: 47.5 (range = 28 to 78) Gender (per cent men): 75.0% Severity: TSS (0 to 24) = 17.0 (3.3SD, N = 22) INCLUSION CRITERIA Chronic plaque psoriasis.

Techniques: Selection

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Topical treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005028.pub3

Figure Lengend Snippet: Crosti 1997

Article Snippet: Methods DESIGN Within‐patient Participant delivery ALLOCATION Random Method of randomisation: randomised in blocks of 4 by the pharmacy department using 'Minitab' Concealment: unclear BLINDING Double‐blind (participant/investigator) WITHDRAWAL/DROPOUT Unclear Participants N: 24 Treatment duration: 12 wks; FU: 12 wks LF: 2 (8.3%) BC: yes Age: 47.5 (range = 28 to 78) Gender (per cent men): 75.0% Severity: TSS (0 to 24) = 17.0 (3.3SD, N = 22) INCLUSION CRITERIA Chronic plaque psoriasis.

Techniques: Ointment, Selection

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Topical treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005028.pub3

Figure Lengend Snippet: De Simone 1993

Article Snippet: Methods DESIGN Within‐patient Participant delivery ALLOCATION Random Method of randomisation: randomised in blocks of 4 by the pharmacy department using 'Minitab' Concealment: unclear BLINDING Double‐blind (participant/investigator) WITHDRAWAL/DROPOUT Unclear Participants N: 24 Treatment duration: 12 wks; FU: 12 wks LF: 2 (8.3%) BC: yes Age: 47.5 (range = 28 to 78) Gender (per cent men): 75.0% Severity: TSS (0 to 24) = 17.0 (3.3SD, N = 22) INCLUSION CRITERIA Chronic plaque psoriasis.

Techniques: Ointment, Selection

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Topical treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005028.pub3

Figure Lengend Snippet: Durakovic 2001

Article Snippet: Methods DESIGN Within‐patient Participant delivery ALLOCATION Random Method of randomisation: randomised in blocks of 4 by the pharmacy department using 'Minitab' Concealment: unclear BLINDING Double‐blind (participant/investigator) WITHDRAWAL/DROPOUT Unclear Participants N: 24 Treatment duration: 12 wks; FU: 12 wks LF: 2 (8.3%) BC: yes Age: 47.5 (range = 28 to 78) Gender (per cent men): 75.0% Severity: TSS (0 to 24) = 17.0 (3.3SD, N = 22) INCLUSION CRITERIA Chronic plaque psoriasis.

Techniques: Ointment, Selection

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Topical treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005028.pub3

Figure Lengend Snippet: Ellis 1988

Article Snippet: Methods DESIGN Within‐patient Participant delivery ALLOCATION Random Method of randomisation: randomised in blocks of 4 by the pharmacy department using 'Minitab' Concealment: unclear BLINDING Double‐blind (participant/investigator) WITHDRAWAL/DROPOUT Unclear Participants N: 24 Treatment duration: 12 wks; FU: 12 wks LF: 2 (8.3%) BC: yes Age: 47.5 (range = 28 to 78) Gender (per cent men): 75.0% Severity: TSS (0 to 24) = 17.0 (3.3SD, N = 22) INCLUSION CRITERIA Chronic plaque psoriasis.

Techniques: Infection, Selection

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Topical treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005028.pub3

Figure Lengend Snippet: Escobar 1992

Article Snippet: Methods DESIGN Within‐patient Participant delivery ALLOCATION Random Method of randomisation: randomised in blocks of 4 by the pharmacy department using 'Minitab' Concealment: unclear BLINDING Double‐blind (participant/investigator) WITHDRAWAL/DROPOUT Unclear Participants N: 24 Treatment duration: 12 wks; FU: 12 wks LF: 2 (8.3%) BC: yes Age: 47.5 (range = 28 to 78) Gender (per cent men): 75.0% Severity: TSS (0 to 24) = 17.0 (3.3SD, N = 22) INCLUSION CRITERIA Chronic plaque psoriasis.

Techniques: Biomarker Discovery, Selection

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Topical treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005028.pub3

Figure Lengend Snippet: Farkas 1999

Article Snippet: Methods DESIGN Within‐patient Participant delivery ALLOCATION Random Method of randomisation: randomised in blocks of 4 by the pharmacy department using 'Minitab' Concealment: unclear BLINDING Double‐blind (participant/investigator) WITHDRAWAL/DROPOUT Unclear Participants N: 24 Treatment duration: 12 wks; FU: 12 wks LF: 2 (8.3%) BC: yes Age: 47.5 (range = 28 to 78) Gender (per cent men): 75.0% Severity: TSS (0 to 24) = 17.0 (3.3SD, N = 22) INCLUSION CRITERIA Chronic plaque psoriasis.

Techniques: Medications, Ointment, Modification, Selection, Blocking Assay

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Topical treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005028.pub3

Figure Lengend Snippet: Feldman 2010 (1)

Article Snippet: Methods DESIGN Within‐patient Participant delivery ALLOCATION Random Method of randomisation: randomised in blocks of 4 by the pharmacy department using 'Minitab' Concealment: unclear BLINDING Double‐blind (participant/investigator) WITHDRAWAL/DROPOUT Unclear Participants N: 24 Treatment duration: 12 wks; FU: 12 wks LF: 2 (8.3%) BC: yes Age: 47.5 (range = 28 to 78) Gender (per cent men): 75.0% Severity: TSS (0 to 24) = 17.0 (3.3SD, N = 22) INCLUSION CRITERIA Chronic plaque psoriasis.

Techniques: Formulation, Selection

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Topical treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005028.pub3

Figure Lengend Snippet: Feldman 2010 (2)

Article Snippet: Methods DESIGN Within‐patient Participant delivery ALLOCATION Random Method of randomisation: randomised in blocks of 4 by the pharmacy department using 'Minitab' Concealment: unclear BLINDING Double‐blind (participant/investigator) WITHDRAWAL/DROPOUT Unclear Participants N: 24 Treatment duration: 12 wks; FU: 12 wks LF: 2 (8.3%) BC: yes Age: 47.5 (range = 28 to 78) Gender (per cent men): 75.0% Severity: TSS (0 to 24) = 17.0 (3.3SD, N = 22) INCLUSION CRITERIA Chronic plaque psoriasis.

Techniques: Formulation, Selection

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Topical treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005028.pub3

Figure Lengend Snippet: Franz 1999

Article Snippet: Methods DESIGN Within‐patient Participant delivery ALLOCATION Random Method of randomisation: randomised in blocks of 4 by the pharmacy department using 'Minitab' Concealment: unclear BLINDING Double‐blind (participant/investigator) WITHDRAWAL/DROPOUT Unclear Participants N: 24 Treatment duration: 12 wks; FU: 12 wks LF: 2 (8.3%) BC: yes Age: 47.5 (range = 28 to 78) Gender (per cent men): 75.0% Severity: TSS (0 to 24) = 17.0 (3.3SD, N = 22) INCLUSION CRITERIA Chronic plaque psoriasis.

Techniques: Selection

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Topical treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005028.pub3

Figure Lengend Snippet: Franz 2000

Article Snippet: Methods DESIGN Within‐patient Participant delivery ALLOCATION Random Method of randomisation: randomised in blocks of 4 by the pharmacy department using 'Minitab' Concealment: unclear BLINDING Double‐blind (participant/investigator) WITHDRAWAL/DROPOUT Unclear Participants N: 24 Treatment duration: 12 wks; FU: 12 wks LF: 2 (8.3%) BC: yes Age: 47.5 (range = 28 to 78) Gender (per cent men): 75.0% Severity: TSS (0 to 24) = 17.0 (3.3SD, N = 22) INCLUSION CRITERIA Chronic plaque psoriasis.

Techniques: Selection

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Topical treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005028.pub3

Figure Lengend Snippet: Geilen 2000

Article Snippet: Methods DESIGN Within‐patient Participant delivery ALLOCATION Random Method of randomisation: randomised in blocks of 4 by the pharmacy department using 'Minitab' Concealment: unclear BLINDING Double‐blind (participant/investigator) WITHDRAWAL/DROPOUT Unclear Participants N: 24 Treatment duration: 12 wks; FU: 12 wks LF: 2 (8.3%) BC: yes Age: 47.5 (range = 28 to 78) Gender (per cent men): 75.0% Severity: TSS (0 to 24) = 17.0 (3.3SD, N = 22) INCLUSION CRITERIA Chronic plaque psoriasis.

Techniques: Ointment, Selection

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Topical treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005028.pub3

Figure Lengend Snippet: Grattan 1997 (H)

Article Snippet: Methods DESIGN Within‐patient Participant delivery ALLOCATION Random Method of randomisation: randomised in blocks of 4 by the pharmacy department using 'Minitab' Concealment: unclear BLINDING Double‐blind (participant/investigator) WITHDRAWAL/DROPOUT Unclear Participants N: 24 Treatment duration: 12 wks; FU: 12 wks LF: 2 (8.3%) BC: yes Age: 47.5 (range = 28 to 78) Gender (per cent men): 75.0% Severity: TSS (0 to 24) = 17.0 (3.3SD, N = 22) INCLUSION CRITERIA Chronic plaque psoriasis.

Techniques: Ointment, Titration, Staining, Selection

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Topical treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005028.pub3

Figure Lengend Snippet: Grattan 1997 (P)

Article Snippet: Methods DESIGN Within‐patient Participant delivery ALLOCATION Random Method of randomisation: randomised in blocks of 4 by the pharmacy department using 'Minitab' Concealment: unclear BLINDING Double‐blind (participant/investigator) WITHDRAWAL/DROPOUT Unclear Participants N: 24 Treatment duration: 12 wks; FU: 12 wks LF: 2 (8.3%) BC: yes Age: 47.5 (range = 28 to 78) Gender (per cent men): 75.0% Severity: TSS (0 to 24) = 17.0 (3.3SD, N = 22) INCLUSION CRITERIA Chronic plaque psoriasis.

Techniques: Titration, Staining, Selection

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Topical treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005028.pub3

Figure Lengend Snippet: Han 2001

Article Snippet: Methods DESIGN Within‐patient Participant delivery ALLOCATION Random Method of randomisation: randomised in blocks of 4 by the pharmacy department using 'Minitab' Concealment: unclear BLINDING Double‐blind (participant/investigator) WITHDRAWAL/DROPOUT Unclear Participants N: 24 Treatment duration: 12 wks; FU: 12 wks LF: 2 (8.3%) BC: yes Age: 47.5 (range = 28 to 78) Gender (per cent men): 75.0% Severity: TSS (0 to 24) = 17.0 (3.3SD, N = 22) INCLUSION CRITERIA Chronic plaque psoriasis.

Techniques: Ointment, Extraction, Selection

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Topical treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005028.pub3

Figure Lengend Snippet: Huang 2009

Article Snippet: Methods DESIGN Within‐patient Participant delivery ALLOCATION Random Method of randomisation: randomised in blocks of 4 by the pharmacy department using 'Minitab' Concealment: unclear BLINDING Double‐blind (participant/investigator) WITHDRAWAL/DROPOUT Unclear Participants N: 24 Treatment duration: 12 wks; FU: 12 wks LF: 2 (8.3%) BC: yes Age: 47.5 (range = 28 to 78) Gender (per cent men): 75.0% Severity: TSS (0 to 24) = 17.0 (3.3SD, N = 22) INCLUSION CRITERIA Chronic plaque psoriasis.

Techniques: Ointment, Selection

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Topical treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005028.pub3

Figure Lengend Snippet: Hutchinson 2000

Article Snippet: Methods DESIGN Within‐patient Participant delivery ALLOCATION Random Method of randomisation: randomised in blocks of 4 by the pharmacy department using 'Minitab' Concealment: unclear BLINDING Double‐blind (participant/investigator) WITHDRAWAL/DROPOUT Unclear Participants N: 24 Treatment duration: 12 wks; FU: 12 wks LF: 2 (8.3%) BC: yes Age: 47.5 (range = 28 to 78) Gender (per cent men): 75.0% Severity: TSS (0 to 24) = 17.0 (3.3SD, N = 22) INCLUSION CRITERIA Chronic plaque psoriasis.

Techniques: Medications, Ointment, Staining, Selection

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Topical treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005028.pub3

Figure Lengend Snippet: Jin 2001

Article Snippet: Methods DESIGN Within‐patient Participant delivery ALLOCATION Random Method of randomisation: randomised in blocks of 4 by the pharmacy department using 'Minitab' Concealment: unclear BLINDING Double‐blind (participant/investigator) WITHDRAWAL/DROPOUT Unclear Participants N: 24 Treatment duration: 12 wks; FU: 12 wks LF: 2 (8.3%) BC: yes Age: 47.5 (range = 28 to 78) Gender (per cent men): 75.0% Severity: TSS (0 to 24) = 17.0 (3.3SD, N = 22) INCLUSION CRITERIA Chronic plaque psoriasis.

Techniques: Cream, Extraction, Selection

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Topical treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005028.pub3

Figure Lengend Snippet: Kanzler 1993

Article Snippet: Methods DESIGN Within‐patient Participant delivery ALLOCATION Random Method of randomisation: randomised in blocks of 4 by the pharmacy department using 'Minitab' Concealment: unclear BLINDING Double‐blind (participant/investigator) WITHDRAWAL/DROPOUT Unclear Participants N: 24 Treatment duration: 12 wks; FU: 12 wks LF: 2 (8.3%) BC: yes Age: 47.5 (range = 28 to 78) Gender (per cent men): 75.0% Severity: TSS (0 to 24) = 17.0 (3.3SD, N = 22) INCLUSION CRITERIA Chronic plaque psoriasis.

Techniques: Selection

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Topical treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005028.pub3

Figure Lengend Snippet: Kim 1994

Article Snippet: Methods DESIGN Within‐patient Participant delivery ALLOCATION Random Method of randomisation: randomised in blocks of 4 by the pharmacy department using 'Minitab' Concealment: unclear BLINDING Double‐blind (participant/investigator) WITHDRAWAL/DROPOUT Unclear Participants N: 24 Treatment duration: 12 wks; FU: 12 wks LF: 2 (8.3%) BC: yes Age: 47.5 (range = 28 to 78) Gender (per cent men): 75.0% Severity: TSS (0 to 24) = 17.0 (3.3SD, N = 22) INCLUSION CRITERIA Chronic plaque psoriasis.

Techniques: Ointment, Selection

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Topical treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005028.pub3

Figure Lengend Snippet: Kragballe 1988b

Article Snippet: Methods DESIGN Within‐patient Participant delivery ALLOCATION Random Method of randomisation: randomised in blocks of 4 by the pharmacy department using 'Minitab' Concealment: unclear BLINDING Double‐blind (participant/investigator) WITHDRAWAL/DROPOUT Unclear Participants N: 24 Treatment duration: 12 wks; FU: 12 wks LF: 2 (8.3%) BC: yes Age: 47.5 (range = 28 to 78) Gender (per cent men): 75.0% Severity: TSS (0 to 24) = 17.0 (3.3SD, N = 22) INCLUSION CRITERIA Chronic plaque psoriasis.

Techniques: Cream, Selection

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Topical treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005028.pub3

Figure Lengend Snippet: Köse 1997

Article Snippet: Methods DESIGN Within‐patient Participant delivery ALLOCATION Random Method of randomisation: randomised in blocks of 4 by the pharmacy department using 'Minitab' Concealment: unclear BLINDING Double‐blind (participant/investigator) WITHDRAWAL/DROPOUT Unclear Participants N: 24 Treatment duration: 12 wks; FU: 12 wks LF: 2 (8.3%) BC: yes Age: 47.5 (range = 28 to 78) Gender (per cent men): 75.0% Severity: TSS (0 to 24) = 17.0 (3.3SD, N = 22) INCLUSION CRITERIA Chronic plaque psoriasis.

Techniques: Ointment, Selection

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Topical treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005028.pub3

Figure Lengend Snippet: Lane 1983

Article Snippet: Methods DESIGN Within‐patient Participant delivery ALLOCATION Random Method of randomisation: randomised in blocks of 4 by the pharmacy department using 'Minitab' Concealment: unclear BLINDING Double‐blind (participant/investigator) WITHDRAWAL/DROPOUT Unclear Participants N: 24 Treatment duration: 12 wks; FU: 12 wks LF: 2 (8.3%) BC: yes Age: 47.5 (range = 28 to 78) Gender (per cent men): 75.0% Severity: TSS (0 to 24) = 17.0 (3.3SD, N = 22) INCLUSION CRITERIA Chronic plaque psoriasis.

Techniques: Ointment, Selection

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Topical treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005028.pub3

Figure Lengend Snippet: Langner 1992

Article Snippet: Methods DESIGN Within‐patient Participant delivery ALLOCATION Random Method of randomisation: randomised in blocks of 4 by the pharmacy department using 'Minitab' Concealment: unclear BLINDING Double‐blind (participant/investigator) WITHDRAWAL/DROPOUT Unclear Participants N: 24 Treatment duration: 12 wks; FU: 12 wks LF: 2 (8.3%) BC: yes Age: 47.5 (range = 28 to 78) Gender (per cent men): 75.0% Severity: TSS (0 to 24) = 17.0 (3.3SD, N = 22) INCLUSION CRITERIA Chronic plaque psoriasis.

Techniques: Ointment, Selection

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Topical treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005028.pub3

Figure Lengend Snippet: Langner 1993

Article Snippet: Methods DESIGN Within‐patient Participant delivery ALLOCATION Random Method of randomisation: randomised in blocks of 4 by the pharmacy department using 'Minitab' Concealment: unclear BLINDING Double‐blind (participant/investigator) WITHDRAWAL/DROPOUT Unclear Participants N: 24 Treatment duration: 12 wks; FU: 12 wks LF: 2 (8.3%) BC: yes Age: 47.5 (range = 28 to 78) Gender (per cent men): 75.0% Severity: TSS (0 to 24) = 17.0 (3.3SD, N = 22) INCLUSION CRITERIA Chronic plaque psoriasis.

Techniques: Analogues, Ointment, Selection

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Topical treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005028.pub3

Figure Lengend Snippet: Langner 2001 (P)

Article Snippet: Methods DESIGN Within‐patient Participant delivery ALLOCATION Random Method of randomisation: randomised in blocks of 4 by the pharmacy department using 'Minitab' Concealment: unclear BLINDING Double‐blind (participant/investigator) WITHDRAWAL/DROPOUT Unclear Participants N: 24 Treatment duration: 12 wks; FU: 12 wks LF: 2 (8.3%) BC: yes Age: 47.5 (range = 28 to 78) Gender (per cent men): 75.0% Severity: TSS (0 to 24) = 17.0 (3.3SD, N = 22) INCLUSION CRITERIA Chronic plaque psoriasis.

Techniques: Ointment, Selection

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Topical treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005028.pub3

Figure Lengend Snippet: Lassus 1991

Article Snippet: Methods DESIGN Within‐patient Participant delivery ALLOCATION Random Method of randomisation: randomised in blocks of 4 by the pharmacy department using 'Minitab' Concealment: unclear BLINDING Double‐blind (participant/investigator) WITHDRAWAL/DROPOUT Unclear Participants N: 24 Treatment duration: 12 wks; FU: 12 wks LF: 2 (8.3%) BC: yes Age: 47.5 (range = 28 to 78) Gender (per cent men): 75.0% Severity: TSS (0 to 24) = 17.0 (3.3SD, N = 22) INCLUSION CRITERIA Chronic plaque psoriasis.

Techniques: Blocking Assay, Selection

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Topical treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005028.pub3

Figure Lengend Snippet: Lee 2007

Article Snippet: Methods DESIGN Within‐patient Participant delivery ALLOCATION Random Method of randomisation: randomised in blocks of 4 by the pharmacy department using 'Minitab' Concealment: unclear BLINDING Double‐blind (participant/investigator) WITHDRAWAL/DROPOUT Unclear Participants N: 24 Treatment duration: 12 wks; FU: 12 wks LF: 2 (8.3%) BC: yes Age: 47.5 (range = 28 to 78) Gender (per cent men): 75.0% Severity: TSS (0 to 24) = 17.0 (3.3SD, N = 22) INCLUSION CRITERIA Chronic plaque psoriasis.

Techniques: Ointment, Selection

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Topical treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005028.pub3

Figure Lengend Snippet: Lepaw 1978

Article Snippet: Methods DESIGN Within‐patient Participant delivery ALLOCATION Random Method of randomisation: randomised in blocks of 4 by the pharmacy department using 'Minitab' Concealment: unclear BLINDING Double‐blind (participant/investigator) WITHDRAWAL/DROPOUT Unclear Participants N: 24 Treatment duration: 12 wks; FU: 12 wks LF: 2 (8.3%) BC: yes Age: 47.5 (range = 28 to 78) Gender (per cent men): 75.0% Severity: TSS (0 to 24) = 17.0 (3.3SD, N = 22) INCLUSION CRITERIA Chronic plaque psoriasis.

Techniques: Clinical Proteomics, Selection

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Topical treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005028.pub3

Figure Lengend Snippet: Lin 2007

Article Snippet: Methods DESIGN Within‐patient Participant delivery ALLOCATION Random Method of randomisation: randomised in blocks of 4 by the pharmacy department using 'Minitab' Concealment: unclear BLINDING Double‐blind (participant/investigator) WITHDRAWAL/DROPOUT Unclear Participants N: 24 Treatment duration: 12 wks; FU: 12 wks LF: 2 (8.3%) BC: yes Age: 47.5 (range = 28 to 78) Gender (per cent men): 75.0% Severity: TSS (0 to 24) = 17.0 (3.3SD, N = 22) INCLUSION CRITERIA Chronic plaque psoriasis.

Techniques: Ointment, Immunohistochemical staining, Selection

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Topical treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005028.pub3

Figure Lengend Snippet: Lin 2008

Article Snippet: Methods DESIGN Within‐patient Participant delivery ALLOCATION Random Method of randomisation: randomised in blocks of 4 by the pharmacy department using 'Minitab' Concealment: unclear BLINDING Double‐blind (participant/investigator) WITHDRAWAL/DROPOUT Unclear Participants N: 24 Treatment duration: 12 wks; FU: 12 wks LF: 2 (8.3%) BC: yes Age: 47.5 (range = 28 to 78) Gender (per cent men): 75.0% Severity: TSS (0 to 24) = 17.0 (3.3SD, N = 22) INCLUSION CRITERIA Chronic plaque psoriasis.

Techniques: Medications, Ointment, Selection

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Topical treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005028.pub3

Figure Lengend Snippet: Lister 1997

Article Snippet: Methods DESIGN Within‐patient Participant delivery ALLOCATION Random Method of randomisation: randomised in blocks of 4 by the pharmacy department using 'Minitab' Concealment: unclear BLINDING Double‐blind (participant/investigator) WITHDRAWAL/DROPOUT Unclear Participants N: 24 Treatment duration: 12 wks; FU: 12 wks LF: 2 (8.3%) BC: yes Age: 47.5 (range = 28 to 78) Gender (per cent men): 75.0% Severity: TSS (0 to 24) = 17.0 (3.3SD, N = 22) INCLUSION CRITERIA Chronic plaque psoriasis.

Techniques: Cream, Selection

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Topical treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005028.pub3

Figure Lengend Snippet: Maier 2004

Article Snippet: Methods DESIGN Within‐patient Participant delivery ALLOCATION Random Method of randomisation: randomised in blocks of 4 by the pharmacy department using 'Minitab' Concealment: unclear BLINDING Double‐blind (participant/investigator) WITHDRAWAL/DROPOUT Unclear Participants N: 24 Treatment duration: 12 wks; FU: 12 wks LF: 2 (8.3%) BC: yes Age: 47.5 (range = 28 to 78) Gender (per cent men): 75.0% Severity: TSS (0 to 24) = 17.0 (3.3SD, N = 22) INCLUSION CRITERIA Chronic plaque psoriasis.

Techniques: Ointment, Selection

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Topical treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005028.pub3

Figure Lengend Snippet: Monastirli 2000

Article Snippet: Methods DESIGN Within‐patient Participant delivery ALLOCATION Random Method of randomisation: randomised in blocks of 4 by the pharmacy department using 'Minitab' Concealment: unclear BLINDING Double‐blind (participant/investigator) WITHDRAWAL/DROPOUT Unclear Participants N: 24 Treatment duration: 12 wks; FU: 12 wks LF: 2 (8.3%) BC: yes Age: 47.5 (range = 28 to 78) Gender (per cent men): 75.0% Severity: TSS (0 to 24) = 17.0 (3.3SD, N = 22) INCLUSION CRITERIA Chronic plaque psoriasis.

Techniques: Medications, Ointment, Selection

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Topical treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005028.pub3

Figure Lengend Snippet: Olsen 1996 (1)

Article Snippet: Methods DESIGN Within‐patient Participant delivery ALLOCATION Random Method of randomisation: randomised in blocks of 4 by the pharmacy department using 'Minitab' Concealment: unclear BLINDING Double‐blind (participant/investigator) WITHDRAWAL/DROPOUT Unclear Participants N: 24 Treatment duration: 12 wks; FU: 12 wks LF: 2 (8.3%) BC: yes Age: 47.5 (range = 28 to 78) Gender (per cent men): 75.0% Severity: TSS (0 to 24) = 17.0 (3.3SD, N = 22) INCLUSION CRITERIA Chronic plaque psoriasis.

Techniques: Ointment, Selection

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Topical treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005028.pub3

Figure Lengend Snippet: Olsen 1996 (2)

Article Snippet: Methods DESIGN Within‐patient Participant delivery ALLOCATION Random Method of randomisation: randomised in blocks of 4 by the pharmacy department using 'Minitab' Concealment: unclear BLINDING Double‐blind (participant/investigator) WITHDRAWAL/DROPOUT Unclear Participants N: 24 Treatment duration: 12 wks; FU: 12 wks LF: 2 (8.3%) BC: yes Age: 47.5 (range = 28 to 78) Gender (per cent men): 75.0% Severity: TSS (0 to 24) = 17.0 (3.3SD, N = 22) INCLUSION CRITERIA Chronic plaque psoriasis.

Techniques: Ointment, Selection

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Topical treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005028.pub3

Figure Lengend Snippet: Ormerod 2000

Article Snippet: Methods DESIGN Within‐patient Participant delivery ALLOCATION Random Method of randomisation: randomised in blocks of 4 by the pharmacy department using 'Minitab' Concealment: unclear BLINDING Double‐blind (participant/investigator) WITHDRAWAL/DROPOUT Unclear Participants N: 24 Treatment duration: 12 wks; FU: 12 wks LF: 2 (8.3%) BC: yes Age: 47.5 (range = 28 to 78) Gender (per cent men): 75.0% Severity: TSS (0 to 24) = 17.0 (3.3SD, N = 22) INCLUSION CRITERIA Chronic plaque psoriasis.

Techniques: Cream, Selection

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Topical treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005028.pub3

Figure Lengend Snippet: Ormerod 2005

Article Snippet: Methods DESIGN Within‐patient Participant delivery ALLOCATION Random Method of randomisation: randomised in blocks of 4 by the pharmacy department using 'Minitab' Concealment: unclear BLINDING Double‐blind (participant/investigator) WITHDRAWAL/DROPOUT Unclear Participants N: 24 Treatment duration: 12 wks; FU: 12 wks LF: 2 (8.3%) BC: yes Age: 47.5 (range = 28 to 78) Gender (per cent men): 75.0% Severity: TSS (0 to 24) = 17.0 (3.3SD, N = 22) INCLUSION CRITERIA Chronic plaque psoriasis.

Techniques: Selection, Blocking Assay

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Topical treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005028.pub3

Figure Lengend Snippet: Papakostantinou 2005

Article Snippet: Methods DESIGN Within‐patient Participant delivery ALLOCATION Random Method of randomisation: randomised in blocks of 4 by the pharmacy department using 'Minitab' Concealment: unclear BLINDING Double‐blind (participant/investigator) WITHDRAWAL/DROPOUT Unclear Participants N: 24 Treatment duration: 12 wks; FU: 12 wks LF: 2 (8.3%) BC: yes Age: 47.5 (range = 28 to 78) Gender (per cent men): 75.0% Severity: TSS (0 to 24) = 17.0 (3.3SD, N = 22) INCLUSION CRITERIA Chronic plaque psoriasis.

Techniques: Ointment, Selection

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Topical treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005028.pub3

Figure Lengend Snippet: Perez 1996

Article Snippet: Methods DESIGN Within‐patient Participant delivery ALLOCATION Random Method of randomisation: randomised in blocks of 4 by the pharmacy department using 'Minitab' Concealment: unclear BLINDING Double‐blind (participant/investigator) WITHDRAWAL/DROPOUT Unclear Participants N: 24 Treatment duration: 12 wks; FU: 12 wks LF: 2 (8.3%) BC: yes Age: 47.5 (range = 28 to 78) Gender (per cent men): 75.0% Severity: TSS (0 to 24) = 17.0 (3.3SD, N = 22) INCLUSION CRITERIA Chronic plaque psoriasis.

Techniques: Medications, Selection

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Topical treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005028.pub3

Figure Lengend Snippet: Sanchez 2001

Article Snippet: Methods DESIGN Within‐patient Participant delivery ALLOCATION Random Method of randomisation: randomised in blocks of 4 by the pharmacy department using 'Minitab' Concealment: unclear BLINDING Double‐blind (participant/investigator) WITHDRAWAL/DROPOUT Unclear Participants N: 24 Treatment duration: 12 wks; FU: 12 wks LF: 2 (8.3%) BC: yes Age: 47.5 (range = 28 to 78) Gender (per cent men): 75.0% Severity: TSS (0 to 24) = 17.0 (3.3SD, N = 22) INCLUSION CRITERIA Chronic plaque psoriasis.

Techniques: Cream, Ointment, Selection

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Topical treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005028.pub3

Figure Lengend Snippet: Santoianni 2001

Article Snippet: Methods DESIGN Within‐patient Participant delivery ALLOCATION Random Method of randomisation: randomised in blocks of 4 by the pharmacy department using 'Minitab' Concealment: unclear BLINDING Double‐blind (participant/investigator) WITHDRAWAL/DROPOUT Unclear Participants N: 24 Treatment duration: 12 wks; FU: 12 wks LF: 2 (8.3%) BC: yes Age: 47.5 (range = 28 to 78) Gender (per cent men): 75.0% Severity: TSS (0 to 24) = 17.0 (3.3SD, N = 22) INCLUSION CRITERIA Chronic plaque psoriasis.

Techniques: Blocking Assay, Selection

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Topical treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005028.pub3

Figure Lengend Snippet: Saraceno 2007

Article Snippet: Methods DESIGN Within‐patient Participant delivery ALLOCATION Random Method of randomisation: randomised in blocks of 4 by the pharmacy department using 'Minitab' Concealment: unclear BLINDING Double‐blind (participant/investigator) WITHDRAWAL/DROPOUT Unclear Participants N: 24 Treatment duration: 12 wks; FU: 12 wks LF: 2 (8.3%) BC: yes Age: 47.5 (range = 28 to 78) Gender (per cent men): 75.0% Severity: TSS (0 to 24) = 17.0 (3.3SD, N = 22) INCLUSION CRITERIA Chronic plaque psoriasis.

Techniques: Cream, Formulation, Selection

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Topical treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005028.pub3

Figure Lengend Snippet: Scarpa 1994

Article Snippet: Methods DESIGN Within‐patient Participant delivery ALLOCATION Random Method of randomisation: randomised in blocks of 4 by the pharmacy department using 'Minitab' Concealment: unclear BLINDING Double‐blind (participant/investigator) WITHDRAWAL/DROPOUT Unclear Participants N: 24 Treatment duration: 12 wks; FU: 12 wks LF: 2 (8.3%) BC: yes Age: 47.5 (range = 28 to 78) Gender (per cent men): 75.0% Severity: TSS (0 to 24) = 17.0 (3.3SD, N = 22) INCLUSION CRITERIA Chronic plaque psoriasis.

Techniques: Ointment, Selection

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Topical treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005028.pub3

Figure Lengend Snippet: Scarpa 1996

Article Snippet: Methods DESIGN Within‐patient Participant delivery ALLOCATION Random Method of randomisation: randomised in blocks of 4 by the pharmacy department using 'Minitab' Concealment: unclear BLINDING Double‐blind (participant/investigator) WITHDRAWAL/DROPOUT Unclear Participants N: 24 Treatment duration: 12 wks; FU: 12 wks LF: 2 (8.3%) BC: yes Age: 47.5 (range = 28 to 78) Gender (per cent men): 75.0% Severity: TSS (0 to 24) = 17.0 (3.3SD, N = 22) INCLUSION CRITERIA Chronic plaque psoriasis.

Techniques: Blocking Assay, Medications, Ointment, Comparison, Selection

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Topical treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005028.pub3

Figure Lengend Snippet: Scarpa 1997

Article Snippet: Methods DESIGN Within‐patient Participant delivery ALLOCATION Random Method of randomisation: randomised in blocks of 4 by the pharmacy department using 'Minitab' Concealment: unclear BLINDING Double‐blind (participant/investigator) WITHDRAWAL/DROPOUT Unclear Participants N: 24 Treatment duration: 12 wks; FU: 12 wks LF: 2 (8.3%) BC: yes Age: 47.5 (range = 28 to 78) Gender (per cent men): 75.0% Severity: TSS (0 to 24) = 17.0 (3.3SD, N = 22) INCLUSION CRITERIA Chronic plaque psoriasis.

Techniques: Ointment, Medications, Selection

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Topical treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005028.pub3

Figure Lengend Snippet: Sears 1997

Article Snippet: Methods DESIGN Within‐patient Participant delivery ALLOCATION Random Method of randomisation: randomised in blocks of 4 by the pharmacy department using 'Minitab' Concealment: unclear BLINDING Double‐blind (participant/investigator) WITHDRAWAL/DROPOUT Unclear Participants N: 24 Treatment duration: 12 wks; FU: 12 wks LF: 2 (8.3%) BC: yes Age: 47.5 (range = 28 to 78) Gender (per cent men): 75.0% Severity: TSS (0 to 24) = 17.0 (3.3SD, N = 22) INCLUSION CRITERIA Chronic plaque psoriasis.

Techniques: Infection, Cream, Selection

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Topical treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005028.pub3

Figure Lengend Snippet: Seidenari 1997 (H)

Article Snippet: Methods DESIGN Within‐patient Participant delivery ALLOCATION Random Method of randomisation: randomised in blocks of 4 by the pharmacy department using 'Minitab' Concealment: unclear BLINDING Double‐blind (participant/investigator) WITHDRAWAL/DROPOUT Unclear Participants N: 24 Treatment duration: 12 wks; FU: 12 wks LF: 2 (8.3%) BC: yes Age: 47.5 (range = 28 to 78) Gender (per cent men): 75.0% Severity: TSS (0 to 24) = 17.0 (3.3SD, N = 22) INCLUSION CRITERIA Chronic plaque psoriasis.

Techniques: Ointment, Selection

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Topical treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005028.pub3

Figure Lengend Snippet: Seidenari 1997 (P)

Article Snippet: Methods DESIGN Within‐patient Participant delivery ALLOCATION Random Method of randomisation: randomised in blocks of 4 by the pharmacy department using 'Minitab' Concealment: unclear BLINDING Double‐blind (participant/investigator) WITHDRAWAL/DROPOUT Unclear Participants N: 24 Treatment duration: 12 wks; FU: 12 wks LF: 2 (8.3%) BC: yes Age: 47.5 (range = 28 to 78) Gender (per cent men): 75.0% Severity: TSS (0 to 24) = 17.0 (3.3SD, N = 22) INCLUSION CRITERIA Chronic plaque psoriasis.

Techniques: Ointment, Selection

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Topical treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005028.pub3

Figure Lengend Snippet: Stuecker 2001

Article Snippet: Methods DESIGN Within‐patient Participant delivery ALLOCATION Random Method of randomisation: randomised in blocks of 4 by the pharmacy department using 'Minitab' Concealment: unclear BLINDING Double‐blind (participant/investigator) WITHDRAWAL/DROPOUT Unclear Participants N: 24 Treatment duration: 12 wks; FU: 12 wks LF: 2 (8.3%) BC: yes Age: 47.5 (range = 28 to 78) Gender (per cent men): 75.0% Severity: TSS (0 to 24) = 17.0 (3.3SD, N = 22) INCLUSION CRITERIA Chronic plaque psoriasis.

Techniques: Modification, Medications, Cream, Selection

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Topical treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005028.pub3

Figure Lengend Snippet: Stutz 1996

Article Snippet: Methods DESIGN Within‐patient Participant delivery ALLOCATION Random Method of randomisation: randomised in blocks of 4 by the pharmacy department using 'Minitab' Concealment: unclear BLINDING Double‐blind (participant/investigator) WITHDRAWAL/DROPOUT Unclear Participants N: 24 Treatment duration: 12 wks; FU: 12 wks LF: 2 (8.3%) BC: yes Age: 47.5 (range = 28 to 78) Gender (per cent men): 75.0% Severity: TSS (0 to 24) = 17.0 (3.3SD, N = 22) INCLUSION CRITERIA Chronic plaque psoriasis.

Techniques: Cream, Selection

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Topical treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005028.pub3

Figure Lengend Snippet: Sudilovsky 1981

Article Snippet: Methods DESIGN Within‐patient Participant delivery ALLOCATION Random Method of randomisation: randomised in blocks of 4 by the pharmacy department using 'Minitab' Concealment: unclear BLINDING Double‐blind (participant/investigator) WITHDRAWAL/DROPOUT Unclear Participants N: 24 Treatment duration: 12 wks; FU: 12 wks LF: 2 (8.3%) BC: yes Age: 47.5 (range = 28 to 78) Gender (per cent men): 75.0% Severity: TSS (0 to 24) = 17.0 (3.3SD, N = 22) INCLUSION CRITERIA Chronic plaque psoriasis.

Techniques: Cream, Clinical Proteomics, Selection

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Topical treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005028.pub3

Figure Lengend Snippet: Syed 1996

Article Snippet: Methods DESIGN Within‐patient Participant delivery ALLOCATION Random Method of randomisation: randomised in blocks of 4 by the pharmacy department using 'Minitab' Concealment: unclear BLINDING Double‐blind (participant/investigator) WITHDRAWAL/DROPOUT Unclear Participants N: 24 Treatment duration: 12 wks; FU: 12 wks LF: 2 (8.3%) BC: yes Age: 47.5 (range = 28 to 78) Gender (per cent men): 75.0% Severity: TSS (0 to 24) = 17.0 (3.3SD, N = 22) INCLUSION CRITERIA Chronic plaque psoriasis.

Techniques: Cream, Selection

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Topical treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005028.pub3

Figure Lengend Snippet: Tzung 2005

Article Snippet: Methods DESIGN Within‐patient Participant delivery ALLOCATION Random Method of randomisation: randomised in blocks of 4 by the pharmacy department using 'Minitab' Concealment: unclear BLINDING Double‐blind (participant/investigator) WITHDRAWAL/DROPOUT Unclear Participants N: 24 Treatment duration: 12 wks; FU: 12 wks LF: 2 (8.3%) BC: yes Age: 47.5 (range = 28 to 78) Gender (per cent men): 75.0% Severity: TSS (0 to 24) = 17.0 (3.3SD, N = 22) INCLUSION CRITERIA Chronic plaque psoriasis.

Techniques: Ointment, Selection

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Topical treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005028.pub3

Figure Lengend Snippet: Vali 2005

Article Snippet: Methods DESIGN Within‐patient Participant delivery ALLOCATION Random Method of randomisation: randomised in blocks of 4 by the pharmacy department using 'Minitab' Concealment: unclear BLINDING Double‐blind (participant/investigator) WITHDRAWAL/DROPOUT Unclear Participants N: 24 Treatment duration: 12 wks; FU: 12 wks LF: 2 (8.3%) BC: yes Age: 47.5 (range = 28 to 78) Gender (per cent men): 75.0% Severity: TSS (0 to 24) = 17.0 (3.3SD, N = 22) INCLUSION CRITERIA Chronic plaque psoriasis.

Techniques: Medications, Modification, Selection

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Topical treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005028.pub3

Figure Lengend Snippet: Van de Kerkhof 1996a

Article Snippet: Methods DESIGN Within‐patient Participant delivery ALLOCATION Random Method of randomisation: randomised in blocks of 4 by the pharmacy department using 'Minitab' Concealment: unclear BLINDING Double‐blind (participant/investigator) WITHDRAWAL/DROPOUT Unclear Participants N: 24 Treatment duration: 12 wks; FU: 12 wks LF: 2 (8.3%) BC: yes Age: 47.5 (range = 28 to 78) Gender (per cent men): 75.0% Severity: TSS (0 to 24) = 17.0 (3.3SD, N = 22) INCLUSION CRITERIA Chronic plaque psoriasis.

Techniques: Selection

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Topical treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005028.pub3

Figure Lengend Snippet: Van der Vleuten 1995

Article Snippet: Methods DESIGN Within‐patient Participant delivery ALLOCATION Random Method of randomisation: randomised in blocks of 4 by the pharmacy department using 'Minitab' Concealment: unclear BLINDING Double‐blind (participant/investigator) WITHDRAWAL/DROPOUT Unclear Participants N: 24 Treatment duration: 12 wks; FU: 12 wks LF: 2 (8.3%) BC: yes Age: 47.5 (range = 28 to 78) Gender (per cent men): 75.0% Severity: TSS (0 to 24) = 17.0 (3.3SD, N = 22) INCLUSION CRITERIA Chronic plaque psoriasis.

Techniques: Modification, Ointment, Selection

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Topical treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005028.pub3

Figure Lengend Snippet: Vanderploeg 1976

Article Snippet: Methods DESIGN Within‐patient Participant delivery ALLOCATION Random Method of randomisation: randomised in blocks of 4 by the pharmacy department using 'Minitab' Concealment: unclear BLINDING Double‐blind (participant/investigator) WITHDRAWAL/DROPOUT Unclear Participants N: 24 Treatment duration: 12 wks; FU: 12 wks LF: 2 (8.3%) BC: yes Age: 47.5 (range = 28 to 78) Gender (per cent men): 75.0% Severity: TSS (0 to 24) = 17.0 (3.3SD, N = 22) INCLUSION CRITERIA Chronic plaque psoriasis.

Techniques: Medications, Ointment, Selection

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Topical treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005028.pub3

Figure Lengend Snippet: Volden 1992

Article Snippet: Methods DESIGN Within‐patient Participant delivery ALLOCATION Random Method of randomisation: randomised in blocks of 4 by the pharmacy department using 'Minitab' Concealment: unclear BLINDING Double‐blind (participant/investigator) WITHDRAWAL/DROPOUT Unclear Participants N: 24 Treatment duration: 12 wks; FU: 12 wks LF: 2 (8.3%) BC: yes Age: 47.5 (range = 28 to 78) Gender (per cent men): 75.0% Severity: TSS (0 to 24) = 17.0 (3.3SD, N = 22) INCLUSION CRITERIA Chronic plaque psoriasis.

Techniques: Selection

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Topical treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005028.pub3

Figure Lengend Snippet: Wolska 1995

Article Snippet: Methods DESIGN Within‐patient Participant delivery ALLOCATION Random Method of randomisation: randomised in blocks of 4 by the pharmacy department using 'Minitab' Concealment: unclear BLINDING Double‐blind (participant/investigator) WITHDRAWAL/DROPOUT Unclear Participants N: 24 Treatment duration: 12 wks; FU: 12 wks LF: 2 (8.3%) BC: yes Age: 47.5 (range = 28 to 78) Gender (per cent men): 75.0% Severity: TSS (0 to 24) = 17.0 (3.3SD, N = 22) INCLUSION CRITERIA Chronic plaque psoriasis.

Techniques: Selection

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Topical treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005028.pub3

Figure Lengend Snippet: Wortzel 1975 (2)

Article Snippet: Methods DESIGN Within‐patient Participant delivery ALLOCATION Random Method of randomisation: randomised in blocks of 4 by the pharmacy department using 'Minitab' Concealment: unclear BLINDING Double‐blind (participant/investigator) WITHDRAWAL/DROPOUT Unclear Participants N: 24 Treatment duration: 12 wks; FU: 12 wks LF: 2 (8.3%) BC: yes Age: 47.5 (range = 28 to 78) Gender (per cent men): 75.0% Severity: TSS (0 to 24) = 17.0 (3.3SD, N = 22) INCLUSION CRITERIA Chronic plaque psoriasis.

Techniques: Ointment, Selection

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Topical treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005028.pub3

Figure Lengend Snippet: Wozel 2001

Article Snippet: Methods DESIGN Within‐patient Participant delivery ALLOCATION Random Method of randomisation: randomised in blocks of 4 by the pharmacy department using 'Minitab' Concealment: unclear BLINDING Double‐blind (participant/investigator) WITHDRAWAL/DROPOUT Unclear Participants N: 24 Treatment duration: 12 wks; FU: 12 wks LF: 2 (8.3%) BC: yes Age: 47.5 (range = 28 to 78) Gender (per cent men): 75.0% Severity: TSS (0 to 24) = 17.0 (3.3SD, N = 22) INCLUSION CRITERIA Chronic plaque psoriasis.

Techniques: Ointment, Selection

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Topical treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005028.pub3

Figure Lengend Snippet: Yang 2009

Article Snippet: Methods DESIGN Within‐patient Participant delivery ALLOCATION Random Method of randomisation: randomised in blocks of 4 by the pharmacy department using 'Minitab' Concealment: unclear BLINDING Double‐blind (participant/investigator) WITHDRAWAL/DROPOUT Unclear Participants N: 24 Treatment duration: 12 wks; FU: 12 wks LF: 2 (8.3%) BC: yes Age: 47.5 (range = 28 to 78) Gender (per cent men): 75.0% Severity: TSS (0 to 24) = 17.0 (3.3SD, N = 22) INCLUSION CRITERIA Chronic plaque psoriasis.

Techniques: Infection, Cream, Extraction, Selection

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Topical treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005028.pub3

Figure Lengend Snippet:

Article Snippet: Methods DESIGN Within‐patient Participant delivery ALLOCATION Random Method of randomisation: randomised in blocks of 4 by the pharmacy department using 'Minitab' Concealment: unclear BLINDING Double‐blind (participant/investigator) WITHDRAWAL/DROPOUT Unclear Participants N: 24 Treatment duration: 12 wks; FU: 12 wks LF: 2 (8.3%) BC: yes Age: 47.5 (range = 28 to 78) Gender (per cent men): 75.0% Severity: TSS (0 to 24) = 17.0 (3.3SD, N = 22) INCLUSION CRITERIA Chronic plaque psoriasis.

Techniques: Comparison

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Topical treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005028.pub3

Figure Lengend Snippet: Calzavara‐Pinton 2011

Article Snippet: Methods DESIGN Within‐patient Participant delivery ALLOCATION Random Method of randomisation: randomised in blocks of 4 by the pharmacy department using 'Minitab' Concealment: unclear BLINDING Double‐blind (participant/investigator) WITHDRAWAL/DROPOUT Unclear Participants N: 24 Treatment duration: 12 wks; FU: 12 wks LF: 2 (8.3%) BC: yes Age: 47.5 (range = 28 to 78) Gender (per cent men): 75.0% Severity: TSS (0 to 24) = 17.0 (3.3SD, N = 22) INCLUSION CRITERIA Chronic plaque psoriasis.

Techniques: Cream, Ointment

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Topical treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005028.pub3

Figure Lengend Snippet: Katoh 2003

Article Snippet: Methods DESIGN Within‐patient Participant delivery ALLOCATION Random Method of randomisation: randomised in blocks of 4 by the pharmacy department using 'Minitab' Concealment: unclear BLINDING Double‐blind (participant/investigator) WITHDRAWAL/DROPOUT Unclear Participants N: 24 Treatment duration: 12 wks; FU: 12 wks LF: 2 (8.3%) BC: yes Age: 47.5 (range = 28 to 78) Gender (per cent men): 75.0% Severity: TSS (0 to 24) = 17.0 (3.3SD, N = 22) INCLUSION CRITERIA Chronic plaque psoriasis.

Techniques: Ointment

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Topical treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005028.pub3

Figure Lengend Snippet: Paulsen 2005

Article Snippet: Methods DESIGN Within‐patient Participant delivery ALLOCATION Random Method of randomisation: randomised in blocks of 4 by the pharmacy department using 'Minitab' Concealment: unclear BLINDING Double‐blind (participant/investigator) WITHDRAWAL/DROPOUT Unclear Participants N: 24 Treatment duration: 12 wks; FU: 12 wks LF: 2 (8.3%) BC: yes Age: 47.5 (range = 28 to 78) Gender (per cent men): 75.0% Severity: TSS (0 to 24) = 17.0 (3.3SD, N = 22) INCLUSION CRITERIA Chronic plaque psoriasis.

Techniques:

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Topical treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005028.pub3

Figure Lengend Snippet: Sadeghian 2011

Article Snippet: Methods DESIGN Within‐patient Participant delivery ALLOCATION Random Method of randomisation: randomised in blocks of 4 by the pharmacy department using 'Minitab' Concealment: unclear BLINDING Double‐blind (participant/investigator) WITHDRAWAL/DROPOUT Unclear Participants N: 24 Treatment duration: 12 wks; FU: 12 wks LF: 2 (8.3%) BC: yes Age: 47.5 (range = 28 to 78) Gender (per cent men): 75.0% Severity: TSS (0 to 24) = 17.0 (3.3SD, N = 22) INCLUSION CRITERIA Chronic plaque psoriasis.

Techniques: Cream

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Topical treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005028.pub3

Figure Lengend Snippet: Vahlquist 2004

Article Snippet: Methods DESIGN Within‐patient Participant delivery ALLOCATION Random Method of randomisation: randomised in blocks of 4 by the pharmacy department using 'Minitab' Concealment: unclear BLINDING Double‐blind (participant/investigator) WITHDRAWAL/DROPOUT Unclear Participants N: 24 Treatment duration: 12 wks; FU: 12 wks LF: 2 (8.3%) BC: yes Age: 47.5 (range = 28 to 78) Gender (per cent men): 75.0% Severity: TSS (0 to 24) = 17.0 (3.3SD, N = 22) INCLUSION CRITERIA Chronic plaque psoriasis.

Techniques: Ointment

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Topical treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005028.pub3

Figure Lengend Snippet: NCT01536886

Article Snippet: Methods DESIGN Within‐patient Participant delivery ALLOCATION Random Method of randomisation: randomised in blocks of 4 by the pharmacy department using 'Minitab' Concealment: unclear BLINDING Double‐blind (participant/investigator) WITHDRAWAL/DROPOUT Unclear Participants N: 24 Treatment duration: 12 wks; FU: 12 wks LF: 2 (8.3%) BC: yes Age: 47.5 (range = 28 to 78) Gender (per cent men): 75.0% Severity: TSS (0 to 24) = 17.0 (3.3SD, N = 22) INCLUSION CRITERIA Chronic plaque psoriasis.

Techniques: Ointment, Pregnancy Test (hCG) Assay, Control, Biomarker Discovery

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Topical treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005028.pub3

Figure Lengend Snippet: NCT01536938

Article Snippet: Methods DESIGN Within‐patient Participant delivery ALLOCATION Random Method of randomisation: randomised in blocks of 4 by the pharmacy department using 'Minitab' Concealment: unclear BLINDING Double‐blind (participant/investigator) WITHDRAWAL/DROPOUT Unclear Participants N: 24 Treatment duration: 12 wks; FU: 12 wks LF: 2 (8.3%) BC: yes Age: 47.5 (range = 28 to 78) Gender (per cent men): 75.0% Severity: TSS (0 to 24) = 17.0 (3.3SD, N = 22) INCLUSION CRITERIA Chronic plaque psoriasis.

Techniques: Pregnancy Test (hCG) Assay, Control, Biomarker Discovery

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Cell salvage for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion in adults undergoing elective surgery

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001888.pub5

Figure Lengend Snippet: Adalberth 1998

Article Snippet: Random sequence generation (selection bias) , Low risk , Patients undergoing primary total hip replacement were randomised to one of three groups using stratified randomisation software (StratOs, Cooked Bits, Oswestry, UK) to balance the groups according to potentially confounding factors. The software used the Pocock and Simon implementation of the minimisation method. Prognostication was based on four prognostic factors: body mass index (BMI), age, gender and the use of aspirin and non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)..

Techniques: Control, Sequencing, Selection

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Cell salvage for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion in adults undergoing elective surgery

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001888.pub5

Figure Lengend Snippet: Atay 2010

Article Snippet: Random sequence generation (selection bias) , Low risk , Patients undergoing primary total hip replacement were randomised to one of three groups using stratified randomisation software (StratOs, Cooked Bits, Oswestry, UK) to balance the groups according to potentially confounding factors. The software used the Pocock and Simon implementation of the minimisation method. Prognostication was based on four prognostic factors: body mass index (BMI), age, gender and the use of aspirin and non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)..

Techniques: Control, Concentration Assay, In Situ, Sequencing, Selection, Blocking Assay

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Cell salvage for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion in adults undergoing elective surgery

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001888.pub5

Figure Lengend Snippet: Cheng 2005

Article Snippet: Random sequence generation (selection bias) , Low risk , Patients undergoing primary total hip replacement were randomised to one of three groups using stratified randomisation software (StratOs, Cooked Bits, Oswestry, UK) to balance the groups according to potentially confounding factors. The software used the Pocock and Simon implementation of the minimisation method. Prognostication was based on four prognostic factors: body mass index (BMI), age, gender and the use of aspirin and non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)..

Techniques: Control, Sequencing, Selection

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Cell salvage for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion in adults undergoing elective surgery

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001888.pub5

Figure Lengend Snippet: Cheung 2010

Article Snippet: Random sequence generation (selection bias) , Low risk , Patients undergoing primary total hip replacement were randomised to one of three groups using stratified randomisation software (StratOs, Cooked Bits, Oswestry, UK) to balance the groups according to potentially confounding factors. The software used the Pocock and Simon implementation of the minimisation method. Prognostication was based on four prognostic factors: body mass index (BMI), age, gender and the use of aspirin and non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)..

Techniques: Control, Concentration Assay, Infection, Comparison, Sequencing, Selection, Software

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Cell salvage for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion in adults undergoing elective surgery

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001888.pub5

Figure Lengend Snippet: Gäbel 2013a

Article Snippet: Random sequence generation (selection bias) , Low risk , Patients undergoing primary total hip replacement were randomised to one of three groups using stratified randomisation software (StratOs, Cooked Bits, Oswestry, UK) to balance the groups according to potentially confounding factors. The software used the Pocock and Simon implementation of the minimisation method. Prognostication was based on four prognostic factors: body mass index (BMI), age, gender and the use of aspirin and non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)..

Techniques: Control, Clinical Proteomics, Sequencing, Selection

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Cell salvage for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion in adults undergoing elective surgery

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001888.pub5

Figure Lengend Snippet: Horstmann 2013

Article Snippet: Random sequence generation (selection bias) , Low risk , Patients undergoing primary total hip replacement were randomised to one of three groups using stratified randomisation software (StratOs, Cooked Bits, Oswestry, UK) to balance the groups according to potentially confounding factors. The software used the Pocock and Simon implementation of the minimisation method. Prognostication was based on four prognostic factors: body mass index (BMI), age, gender and the use of aspirin and non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)..

Techniques: Control, Sequencing, Selection

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Cell salvage for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion in adults undergoing elective surgery

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001888.pub5

Figure Lengend Snippet: Horstmann 2014b

Article Snippet: Random sequence generation (selection bias) , Low risk , Patients undergoing primary total hip replacement were randomised to one of three groups using stratified randomisation software (StratOs, Cooked Bits, Oswestry, UK) to balance the groups according to potentially confounding factors. The software used the Pocock and Simon implementation of the minimisation method. Prognostication was based on four prognostic factors: body mass index (BMI), age, gender and the use of aspirin and non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)..

Techniques: Control, Sequencing, Selection, Generated

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Cell salvage for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion in adults undergoing elective surgery

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001888.pub5

Figure Lengend Snippet: Koopman‐van Gemert 1993a

Article Snippet: Random sequence generation (selection bias) , Low risk , Patients undergoing primary total hip replacement were randomised to one of three groups using stratified randomisation software (StratOs, Cooked Bits, Oswestry, UK) to balance the groups according to potentially confounding factors. The software used the Pocock and Simon implementation of the minimisation method. Prognostication was based on four prognostic factors: body mass index (BMI), age, gender and the use of aspirin and non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)..

Techniques: Control, Sterility, Suspension, Sequencing, Selection

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Cell salvage for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion in adults undergoing elective surgery

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001888.pub5

Figure Lengend Snippet: Mac 1993

Article Snippet: Random sequence generation (selection bias) , Low risk , Patients undergoing primary total hip replacement were randomised to one of three groups using stratified randomisation software (StratOs, Cooked Bits, Oswestry, UK) to balance the groups according to potentially confounding factors. The software used the Pocock and Simon implementation of the minimisation method. Prognostication was based on four prognostic factors: body mass index (BMI), age, gender and the use of aspirin and non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)..

Techniques: Control, Sequencing, Selection

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Cell salvage for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion in adults undergoing elective surgery

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001888.pub5

Figure Lengend Snippet: Marberg 2010

Article Snippet: Random sequence generation (selection bias) , Low risk , Patients undergoing primary total hip replacement were randomised to one of three groups using stratified randomisation software (StratOs, Cooked Bits, Oswestry, UK) to balance the groups according to potentially confounding factors. The software used the Pocock and Simon implementation of the minimisation method. Prognostication was based on four prognostic factors: body mass index (BMI), age, gender and the use of aspirin and non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)..

Techniques: Control, Clinical Proteomics, Coagulation, Sequencing, Selection

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Cell salvage for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion in adults undergoing elective surgery

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001888.pub5

Figure Lengend Snippet: Mauerhan 1993

Article Snippet: Random sequence generation (selection bias) , Low risk , Patients undergoing primary total hip replacement were randomised to one of three groups using stratified randomisation software (StratOs, Cooked Bits, Oswestry, UK) to balance the groups according to potentially confounding factors. The software used the Pocock and Simon implementation of the minimisation method. Prognostication was based on four prognostic factors: body mass index (BMI), age, gender and the use of aspirin and non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)..

Techniques: Control, Sequencing, Selection

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Cell salvage for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion in adults undergoing elective surgery

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001888.pub5

Figure Lengend Snippet: McShane 1987

Article Snippet: Random sequence generation (selection bias) , Low risk , Patients undergoing primary total hip replacement were randomised to one of three groups using stratified randomisation software (StratOs, Cooked Bits, Oswestry, UK) to balance the groups according to potentially confounding factors. The software used the Pocock and Simon implementation of the minimisation method. Prognostication was based on four prognostic factors: body mass index (BMI), age, gender and the use of aspirin and non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)..

Techniques: Control, Comparison, Clinical Proteomics, Sequencing, Selection

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Cell salvage for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion in adults undergoing elective surgery

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001888.pub5

Figure Lengend Snippet: Moonen 2007

Article Snippet: Random sequence generation (selection bias) , Low risk , Patients undergoing primary total hip replacement were randomised to one of three groups using stratified randomisation software (StratOs, Cooked Bits, Oswestry, UK) to balance the groups according to potentially confounding factors. The software used the Pocock and Simon implementation of the minimisation method. Prognostication was based on four prognostic factors: body mass index (BMI), age, gender and the use of aspirin and non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)..

Techniques: Control, Sequencing, Selection, Generated, Labeling, Blocking Assay

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Cell salvage for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion in adults undergoing elective surgery

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001888.pub5

Figure Lengend Snippet: NCT01251042

Article Snippet: Random sequence generation (selection bias) , Low risk , Patients undergoing primary total hip replacement were randomised to one of three groups using stratified randomisation software (StratOs, Cooked Bits, Oswestry, UK) to balance the groups according to potentially confounding factors. The software used the Pocock and Simon implementation of the minimisation method. Prognostication was based on four prognostic factors: body mass index (BMI), age, gender and the use of aspirin and non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)..

Techniques: Control, Sequencing, Selection

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Cell salvage for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion in adults undergoing elective surgery

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001888.pub5

Figure Lengend Snippet: Schmidt 1996

Article Snippet: Random sequence generation (selection bias) , Low risk , Patients undergoing primary total hip replacement were randomised to one of three groups using stratified randomisation software (StratOs, Cooked Bits, Oswestry, UK) to balance the groups according to potentially confounding factors. The software used the Pocock and Simon implementation of the minimisation method. Prognostication was based on four prognostic factors: body mass index (BMI), age, gender and the use of aspirin and non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)..

Techniques: Control, Concentration Assay, Sequencing, Selection

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Cell salvage for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion in adults undergoing elective surgery

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001888.pub5

Figure Lengend Snippet: Teetzman 2014

Article Snippet: Random sequence generation (selection bias) , Low risk , Patients undergoing primary total hip replacement were randomised to one of three groups using stratified randomisation software (StratOs, Cooked Bits, Oswestry, UK) to balance the groups according to potentially confounding factors. The software used the Pocock and Simon implementation of the minimisation method. Prognostication was based on four prognostic factors: body mass index (BMI), age, gender and the use of aspirin and non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)..

Techniques: Control, Medications, Infection, Sequencing, Selection

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Cell salvage for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion in adults undergoing elective surgery

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001888.pub5

Figure Lengend Snippet: Thomassen 2014

Article Snippet: Random sequence generation (selection bias) , Low risk , Patients undergoing primary total hip replacement were randomised to one of three groups using stratified randomisation software (StratOs, Cooked Bits, Oswestry, UK) to balance the groups according to potentially confounding factors. The software used the Pocock and Simon implementation of the minimisation method. Prognostication was based on four prognostic factors: body mass index (BMI), age, gender and the use of aspirin and non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)..

Techniques: Control, Sequencing, Selection, Blocking Assay

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Cell salvage for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion in adults undergoing elective surgery

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001888.pub5

Figure Lengend Snippet: Thompson 1990

Article Snippet: Random sequence generation (selection bias) , Low risk , Patients undergoing primary total hip replacement were randomised to one of three groups using stratified randomisation software (StratOs, Cooked Bits, Oswestry, UK) to balance the groups according to potentially confounding factors. The software used the Pocock and Simon implementation of the minimisation method. Prognostication was based on four prognostic factors: body mass index (BMI), age, gender and the use of aspirin and non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)..

Techniques: Control, Sequencing, Selection, Generated, Diagnostic Assay

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Cell salvage for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion in adults undergoing elective surgery

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001888.pub5

Figure Lengend Snippet: Touzopoulos 2021

Article Snippet: Random sequence generation (selection bias) , Low risk , Patients undergoing primary total hip replacement were randomised to one of three groups using stratified randomisation software (StratOs, Cooked Bits, Oswestry, UK) to balance the groups according to potentially confounding factors. The software used the Pocock and Simon implementation of the minimisation method. Prognostication was based on four prognostic factors: body mass index (BMI), age, gender and the use of aspirin and non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)..

Techniques: Control, Concentration Assay, Sequencing, Selection, Generated, Clinical Proteomics

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Cell salvage for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion in adults undergoing elective surgery

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001888.pub5

Figure Lengend Snippet: Unsworth 1996

Article Snippet: Random sequence generation (selection bias) , Low risk , Patients undergoing primary total hip replacement were randomised to one of three groups using stratified randomisation software (StratOs, Cooked Bits, Oswestry, UK) to balance the groups according to potentially confounding factors. The software used the Pocock and Simon implementation of the minimisation method. Prognostication was based on four prognostic factors: body mass index (BMI), age, gender and the use of aspirin and non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)..

Techniques: Control, Sequencing, Selection

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Cell salvage for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion in adults undergoing elective surgery

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001888.pub5

Figure Lengend Snippet: Zhao 2016

Article Snippet: Random sequence generation (selection bias) , Low risk , Patients undergoing primary total hip replacement were randomised to one of three groups using stratified randomisation software (StratOs, Cooked Bits, Oswestry, UK) to balance the groups according to potentially confounding factors. The software used the Pocock and Simon implementation of the minimisation method. Prognostication was based on four prognostic factors: body mass index (BMI), age, gender and the use of aspirin and non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)..

Techniques: Control, Sequencing, Selection

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Cell salvage for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion in adults undergoing elective surgery

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001888.pub5

Figure Lengend Snippet:

Article Snippet: Random sequence generation (selection bias) , Low risk , Patients undergoing primary total hip replacement were randomised to one of three groups using stratified randomisation software (StratOs, Cooked Bits, Oswestry, UK) to balance the groups according to potentially confounding factors. The software used the Pocock and Simon implementation of the minimisation method. Prognostication was based on four prognostic factors: body mass index (BMI), age, gender and the use of aspirin and non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)..

Techniques: Control, Comparison, Saline, Filtration, Centrifugation, Clinical Proteomics

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Cell salvage for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion in adults undergoing elective surgery

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001888.pub5

Figure Lengend Snippet: Aghdaii 2012

Article Snippet: Random sequence generation (selection bias) , Low risk , Patients undergoing primary total hip replacement were randomised to one of three groups using stratified randomisation software (StratOs, Cooked Bits, Oswestry, UK) to balance the groups according to potentially confounding factors. The software used the Pocock and Simon implementation of the minimisation method. Prognostication was based on four prognostic factors: body mass index (BMI), age, gender and the use of aspirin and non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)..

Techniques: Control, Coagulation

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Cell salvage for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion in adults undergoing elective surgery

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001888.pub5

Figure Lengend Snippet: Bouboulis 1994

Article Snippet: Random sequence generation (selection bias) , Low risk , Patients undergoing primary total hip replacement were randomised to one of three groups using stratified randomisation software (StratOs, Cooked Bits, Oswestry, UK) to balance the groups according to potentially confounding factors. The software used the Pocock and Simon implementation of the minimisation method. Prognostication was based on four prognostic factors: body mass index (BMI), age, gender and the use of aspirin and non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)..

Techniques: Control, Infection

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Cell salvage for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion in adults undergoing elective surgery

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001888.pub5

Figure Lengend Snippet: Cavolli 2011

Article Snippet: Random sequence generation (selection bias) , Low risk , Patients undergoing primary total hip replacement were randomised to one of three groups using stratified randomisation software (StratOs, Cooked Bits, Oswestry, UK) to balance the groups according to potentially confounding factors. The software used the Pocock and Simon implementation of the minimisation method. Prognostication was based on four prognostic factors: body mass index (BMI), age, gender and the use of aspirin and non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)..

Techniques: Control, Coagulation, Concentration Assay

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Cell salvage for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion in adults undergoing elective surgery

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001888.pub5

Figure Lengend Snippet: ChiCTR‐IOR‐17010508

Article Snippet: Random sequence generation (selection bias) , Low risk , Patients undergoing primary total hip replacement were randomised to one of three groups using stratified randomisation software (StratOs, Cooked Bits, Oswestry, UK) to balance the groups according to potentially confounding factors. The software used the Pocock and Simon implementation of the minimisation method. Prognostication was based on four prognostic factors: body mass index (BMI), age, gender and the use of aspirin and non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)..

Techniques: Control, Concentration Assay, Clinical Proteomics

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Cell salvage for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion in adults undergoing elective surgery

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001888.pub5

Figure Lengend Snippet: Fragnito 1995

Article Snippet: Random sequence generation (selection bias) , Low risk , Patients undergoing primary total hip replacement were randomised to one of three groups using stratified randomisation software (StratOs, Cooked Bits, Oswestry, UK) to balance the groups according to potentially confounding factors. The software used the Pocock and Simon implementation of the minimisation method. Prognostication was based on four prognostic factors: body mass index (BMI), age, gender and the use of aspirin and non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)..

Techniques: Control

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Cell salvage for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion in adults undergoing elective surgery

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001888.pub5

Figure Lengend Snippet: ISRCTN24531848

Article Snippet: Random sequence generation (selection bias) , Low risk , Patients undergoing primary total hip replacement were randomised to one of three groups using stratified randomisation software (StratOs, Cooked Bits, Oswestry, UK) to balance the groups according to potentially confounding factors. The software used the Pocock and Simon implementation of the minimisation method. Prognostication was based on four prognostic factors: body mass index (BMI), age, gender and the use of aspirin and non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)..

Techniques: Control

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Cell salvage for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion in adults undergoing elective surgery

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001888.pub5

Figure Lengend Snippet: ISRCTN55488814

Article Snippet: Random sequence generation (selection bias) , Low risk , Patients undergoing primary total hip replacement were randomised to one of three groups using stratified randomisation software (StratOs, Cooked Bits, Oswestry, UK) to balance the groups according to potentially confounding factors. The software used the Pocock and Simon implementation of the minimisation method. Prognostication was based on four prognostic factors: body mass index (BMI), age, gender and the use of aspirin and non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)..

Techniques: Control

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Cell salvage for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion in adults undergoing elective surgery

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001888.pub5

Figure Lengend Snippet: Martin 2009

Article Snippet: Random sequence generation (selection bias) , Low risk , Patients undergoing primary total hip replacement were randomised to one of three groups using stratified randomisation software (StratOs, Cooked Bits, Oswestry, UK) to balance the groups according to potentially confounding factors. The software used the Pocock and Simon implementation of the minimisation method. Prognostication was based on four prognostic factors: body mass index (BMI), age, gender and the use of aspirin and non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)..

Techniques: Concentration Assay

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Cell salvage for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion in adults undergoing elective surgery

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001888.pub5

Figure Lengend Snippet: Matkovic 2010

Article Snippet: Random sequence generation (selection bias) , Low risk , Patients undergoing primary total hip replacement were randomised to one of three groups using stratified randomisation software (StratOs, Cooked Bits, Oswestry, UK) to balance the groups according to potentially confounding factors. The software used the Pocock and Simon implementation of the minimisation method. Prognostication was based on four prognostic factors: body mass index (BMI), age, gender and the use of aspirin and non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)..

Techniques: Control

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Cell salvage for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion in adults undergoing elective surgery

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001888.pub5

Figure Lengend Snippet: Morgenschweis 2011

Article Snippet: Random sequence generation (selection bias) , Low risk , Patients undergoing primary total hip replacement were randomised to one of three groups using stratified randomisation software (StratOs, Cooked Bits, Oswestry, UK) to balance the groups according to potentially confounding factors. The software used the Pocock and Simon implementation of the minimisation method. Prognostication was based on four prognostic factors: body mass index (BMI), age, gender and the use of aspirin and non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)..

Techniques: Control, Centrifugation

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Cell salvage for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion in adults undergoing elective surgery

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001888.pub5

Figure Lengend Snippet: Narula 2015

Article Snippet: Random sequence generation (selection bias) , Low risk , Patients undergoing primary total hip replacement were randomised to one of three groups using stratified randomisation software (StratOs, Cooked Bits, Oswestry, UK) to balance the groups according to potentially confounding factors. The software used the Pocock and Simon implementation of the minimisation method. Prognostication was based on four prognostic factors: body mass index (BMI), age, gender and the use of aspirin and non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)..

Techniques: Control

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Cell salvage for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion in adults undergoing elective surgery

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001888.pub5

Figure Lengend Snippet: NCT00950547

Article Snippet: Random sequence generation (selection bias) , Low risk , Patients undergoing primary total hip replacement were randomised to one of three groups using stratified randomisation software (StratOs, Cooked Bits, Oswestry, UK) to balance the groups according to potentially confounding factors. The software used the Pocock and Simon implementation of the minimisation method. Prognostication was based on four prognostic factors: body mass index (BMI), age, gender and the use of aspirin and non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)..

Techniques: Control

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Cell salvage for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion in adults undergoing elective surgery

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001888.pub5

Figure Lengend Snippet: NCT01468129

Article Snippet: Random sequence generation (selection bias) , Low risk , Patients undergoing primary total hip replacement were randomised to one of three groups using stratified randomisation software (StratOs, Cooked Bits, Oswestry, UK) to balance the groups according to potentially confounding factors. The software used the Pocock and Simon implementation of the minimisation method. Prognostication was based on four prognostic factors: body mass index (BMI), age, gender and the use of aspirin and non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)..

Techniques: Control

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Cell salvage for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion in adults undergoing elective surgery

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001888.pub5

Figure Lengend Snippet: NCT02058134

Article Snippet: Random sequence generation (selection bias) , Low risk , Patients undergoing primary total hip replacement were randomised to one of three groups using stratified randomisation software (StratOs, Cooked Bits, Oswestry, UK) to balance the groups according to potentially confounding factors. The software used the Pocock and Simon implementation of the minimisation method. Prognostication was based on four prognostic factors: body mass index (BMI), age, gender and the use of aspirin and non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)..

Techniques: Control

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Cell salvage for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion in adults undergoing elective surgery

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001888.pub5

Figure Lengend Snippet: Ritter 1994

Article Snippet: Random sequence generation (selection bias) , Low risk , Patients undergoing primary total hip replacement were randomised to one of three groups using stratified randomisation software (StratOs, Cooked Bits, Oswestry, UK) to balance the groups according to potentially confounding factors. The software used the Pocock and Simon implementation of the minimisation method. Prognostication was based on four prognostic factors: body mass index (BMI), age, gender and the use of aspirin and non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)..

Techniques: Control, Comparison

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Cell salvage for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion in adults undergoing elective surgery

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001888.pub5

Figure Lengend Snippet: Shen 2013

Article Snippet: Random sequence generation (selection bias) , Low risk , Patients undergoing primary total hip replacement were randomised to one of three groups using stratified randomisation software (StratOs, Cooked Bits, Oswestry, UK) to balance the groups according to potentially confounding factors. The software used the Pocock and Simon implementation of the minimisation method. Prognostication was based on four prognostic factors: body mass index (BMI), age, gender and the use of aspirin and non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)..

Techniques: Control

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Cell salvage for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion in adults undergoing elective surgery

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001888.pub5

Figure Lengend Snippet: Simpson 1994

Article Snippet: Random sequence generation (selection bias) , Low risk , Patients undergoing primary total hip replacement were randomised to one of three groups using stratified randomisation software (StratOs, Cooked Bits, Oswestry, UK) to balance the groups according to potentially confounding factors. The software used the Pocock and Simon implementation of the minimisation method. Prognostication was based on four prognostic factors: body mass index (BMI), age, gender and the use of aspirin and non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)..

Techniques: Control, Coagulation, Comparison

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Cell salvage for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion in adults undergoing elective surgery

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001888.pub5

Figure Lengend Snippet: Sintes 2009

Article Snippet: Random sequence generation (selection bias) , Low risk , Patients undergoing primary total hip replacement were randomised to one of three groups using stratified randomisation software (StratOs, Cooked Bits, Oswestry, UK) to balance the groups according to potentially confounding factors. The software used the Pocock and Simon implementation of the minimisation method. Prognostication was based on four prognostic factors: body mass index (BMI), age, gender and the use of aspirin and non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)..

Techniques: Concentration Assay, Coagulation, Comparison

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Cell salvage for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion in adults undergoing elective surgery

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001888.pub5

Figure Lengend Snippet: Skoura 1997

Article Snippet: Random sequence generation (selection bias) , Low risk , Patients undergoing primary total hip replacement were randomised to one of three groups using stratified randomisation software (StratOs, Cooked Bits, Oswestry, UK) to balance the groups according to potentially confounding factors. The software used the Pocock and Simon implementation of the minimisation method. Prognostication was based on four prognostic factors: body mass index (BMI), age, gender and the use of aspirin and non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)..

Techniques: Control

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Cell salvage for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion in adults undergoing elective surgery

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001888.pub5

Figure Lengend Snippet: Srndic 2014

Article Snippet: Random sequence generation (selection bias) , Low risk , Patients undergoing primary total hip replacement were randomised to one of three groups using stratified randomisation software (StratOs, Cooked Bits, Oswestry, UK) to balance the groups according to potentially confounding factors. The software used the Pocock and Simon implementation of the minimisation method. Prognostication was based on four prognostic factors: body mass index (BMI), age, gender and the use of aspirin and non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)..

Techniques: Control

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Cell salvage for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion in adults undergoing elective surgery

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001888.pub5

Figure Lengend Snippet: Stamenic 2009

Article Snippet: Random sequence generation (selection bias) , Low risk , Patients undergoing primary total hip replacement were randomised to one of three groups using stratified randomisation software (StratOs, Cooked Bits, Oswestry, UK) to balance the groups according to potentially confounding factors. The software used the Pocock and Simon implementation of the minimisation method. Prognostication was based on four prognostic factors: body mass index (BMI), age, gender and the use of aspirin and non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)..

Techniques: Control, Coagulation

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Cell salvage for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion in adults undergoing elective surgery

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001888.pub5

Figure Lengend Snippet: Washington 2009

Article Snippet: Random sequence generation (selection bias) , Low risk , Patients undergoing primary total hip replacement were randomised to one of three groups using stratified randomisation software (StratOs, Cooked Bits, Oswestry, UK) to balance the groups according to potentially confounding factors. The software used the Pocock and Simon implementation of the minimisation method. Prognostication was based on four prognostic factors: body mass index (BMI), age, gender and the use of aspirin and non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)..

Techniques: Control

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Cell salvage for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion in adults undergoing elective surgery

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001888.pub5

Figure Lengend Snippet: Yu 2022

Article Snippet: Random sequence generation (selection bias) , Low risk , Patients undergoing primary total hip replacement were randomised to one of three groups using stratified randomisation software (StratOs, Cooked Bits, Oswestry, UK) to balance the groups according to potentially confounding factors. The software used the Pocock and Simon implementation of the minimisation method. Prognostication was based on four prognostic factors: body mass index (BMI), age, gender and the use of aspirin and non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)..

Techniques: Control, Saline, Cell Counting, Coagulation, Clarification Assay

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Cell salvage for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion in adults undergoing elective surgery

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001888.pub5

Figure Lengend Snippet: ChiCTR1800018118

Article Snippet: Random sequence generation (selection bias) , Low risk , Patients undergoing primary total hip replacement were randomised to one of three groups using stratified randomisation software (StratOs, Cooked Bits, Oswestry, UK) to balance the groups according to potentially confounding factors. The software used the Pocock and Simon implementation of the minimisation method. Prognostication was based on four prognostic factors: body mass index (BMI), age, gender and the use of aspirin and non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)..

Techniques: Control, Modification, Clinical Proteomics

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Cell salvage for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion in adults undergoing elective surgery

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001888.pub5

Figure Lengend Snippet: DRKS00021914

Article Snippet: Random sequence generation (selection bias) , Low risk , Patients undergoing primary total hip replacement were randomised to one of three groups using stratified randomisation software (StratOs, Cooked Bits, Oswestry, UK) to balance the groups according to potentially confounding factors. The software used the Pocock and Simon implementation of the minimisation method. Prognostication was based on four prognostic factors: body mass index (BMI), age, gender and the use of aspirin and non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)..

Techniques: Isolation, Control, Filtration, Clinical Proteomics

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Cell salvage for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion in adults undergoing elective surgery

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001888.pub5

Figure Lengend Snippet: NCT02595385 (CONSERVE)

Article Snippet: Random sequence generation (selection bias) , Low risk , Patients undergoing primary total hip replacement were randomised to one of three groups using stratified randomisation software (StratOs, Cooked Bits, Oswestry, UK) to balance the groups according to potentially confounding factors. The software used the Pocock and Simon implementation of the minimisation method. Prognostication was based on four prognostic factors: body mass index (BMI), age, gender and the use of aspirin and non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)..

Techniques: Control, Filtration

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Cell salvage for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion in adults undergoing elective surgery

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001888.pub5

Figure Lengend Snippet: NCT03429790

Article Snippet: Random sequence generation (selection bias) , Low risk , Patients undergoing primary total hip replacement were randomised to one of three groups using stratified randomisation software (StratOs, Cooked Bits, Oswestry, UK) to balance the groups according to potentially confounding factors. The software used the Pocock and Simon implementation of the minimisation method. Prognostication was based on four prognostic factors: body mass index (BMI), age, gender and the use of aspirin and non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)..

Techniques: Control, Selection, Concentration Assay

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Cell salvage for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion in adults undergoing elective surgery

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001888.pub5

Figure Lengend Snippet: NCT04574128

Article Snippet: Random sequence generation (selection bias) , Low risk , Patients undergoing primary total hip replacement were randomised to one of three groups using stratified randomisation software (StratOs, Cooked Bits, Oswestry, UK) to balance the groups according to potentially confounding factors. The software used the Pocock and Simon implementation of the minimisation method. Prognostication was based on four prognostic factors: body mass index (BMI), age, gender and the use of aspirin and non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)..

Techniques: Control, Infection, Concentration Assay

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Cell salvage for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion in adults undergoing elective surgery

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001888.pub5

Figure Lengend Snippet: NCT04922307 (RESTRICT)

Article Snippet: Random sequence generation (selection bias) , Low risk , Patients undergoing primary total hip replacement were randomised to one of three groups using stratified randomisation software (StratOs, Cooked Bits, Oswestry, UK) to balance the groups according to potentially confounding factors. The software used the Pocock and Simon implementation of the minimisation method. Prognostication was based on four prognostic factors: body mass index (BMI), age, gender and the use of aspirin and non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)..

Techniques: Control, Imaging, Functional Assay

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Cell salvage for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion in adults undergoing elective surgery

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001888.pub5

Figure Lengend Snippet: NCT05612477

Article Snippet: Random sequence generation (selection bias) , Low risk , Patients undergoing primary total hip replacement were randomised to one of three groups using stratified randomisation software (StratOs, Cooked Bits, Oswestry, UK) to balance the groups according to potentially confounding factors. The software used the Pocock and Simon implementation of the minimisation method. Prognostication was based on four prognostic factors: body mass index (BMI), age, gender and the use of aspirin and non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)..

Techniques: Transplantation Assay, Control, Biomarker Discovery