protein Search Results


96
Invent Biotechnologies bone tissue
Bone Tissue, supplied by Invent Biotechnologies, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/bone tissue/product/Invent Biotechnologies
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
bone tissue - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
LI-COR protein ladder
Protein Ladder, supplied by LI-COR, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/protein ladder/product/LI-COR
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
protein ladder - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
MedChemExpress anti α sma
Anti α Sma, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/anti α sma/product/MedChemExpress
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti α sma - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

99
MedChemExpress protein a g magnetic beads
Protein A G Magnetic Beads, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/protein a g magnetic beads/product/MedChemExpress
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
protein a g magnetic beads - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

99
Inotiv rodent diet
Rodent Diet, supplied by Inotiv, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/rodent diet/product/Inotiv
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rodent diet - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
New England Biolabs color protein standard
Color Protein Standard, supplied by New England Biolabs, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/color protein standard/product/New England Biolabs
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
color protein standard - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
New England Biolabs lambda protein phosphatase
Lambda Protein Phosphatase, supplied by New England Biolabs, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/lambda protein phosphatase/product/New England Biolabs
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
lambda protein phosphatase - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
Santa Cruz Biotechnology rpl19
Figure 2. The µ2 protein impairs translation: (A) WB of newly synthesized proteins in HEK 293T cells expressing GFP, µ2-GFP, or GFP- µ2. Cells were transfected for 48 h, newly synthesized proteins were metabolically labeled with AHA for 4 h (or DMSO for control), a biotin moiety was added using CLICK chemistry and revealed using streptavidin-HRP. A loading control (actin) was loaded and a WB against GFP was realized to validate the expression of GFP and fusion protein between GFP and µ2; (B) quantification of three independent experiments. Biological replicates, n = 3, one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test against the GFP alone condition (***, p ≤0.001); (C) polysome profiles for control GFP or µ2-expressing cells. Polysome to monosome ratio (P/M) and heavy to light ratio (H/L) were calculated as described in the material and methods section. Respective profiles were overlapped by aligning the 40S to the same height; (D) polysome to monosome ratio (P/M) and heavy to light ratio (H/L) from three independent experiments for control GFP or µ2-expressing cells. Biological replicates, n = 3, one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test against the GFP alone condition (***, p ≤0.001); (E) relative mRNA level determined by qPCR for EFTUD2, PRPF8, SNRNP200, and GAPDH in 40S + 60S, 80S, and polysomal (P1 + P2 + P3) fractions from GFP or µ2-GFP expressing cells at 48 h post-transfection. Lysates were prepared, separated on a 5–50% sucrose gradient, and 30% of each fraction was subjected to RNA extraction using Qiazol. RNA was reverse transcribed using a fixed volume for each sample and subjected to qPCR with U6 snRNA as the housekeeping gene, as it was stable between all fractions. The relative expression is calculated against the first sample in the GFP condition for the 40S + 60S fraction. n = 3, biological replicates, two-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test against the GFP control for each fraction (ns, p > 0.05); and (F) WB against GFP, <t>RPL19</t> (large subunit), RPS2 (small subunit), and actin in polysomal fractions from control GFP or µ2-expressing cells at 48 h post-transfection in HEK 293T cells. Results presented are mean ± standard deviation.
Rpl19, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/rpl19/product/Santa Cruz Biotechnology
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rpl19 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

99
Danaher Inc gfp
Figure 2. The µ2 protein impairs translation: (A) WB of newly synthesized proteins in HEK 293T cells expressing GFP, µ2-GFP, or GFP- µ2. Cells were transfected for 48 h, newly synthesized proteins were metabolically labeled with AHA for 4 h (or DMSO for control), a biotin moiety was added using CLICK chemistry and revealed using streptavidin-HRP. A loading control (actin) was loaded and a WB against GFP was realized to validate the expression of GFP and fusion protein between GFP and µ2; (B) quantification of three independent experiments. Biological replicates, n = 3, one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test against the GFP alone condition (***, p ≤0.001); (C) polysome profiles for control GFP or µ2-expressing cells. Polysome to monosome ratio (P/M) and heavy to light ratio (H/L) were calculated as described in the material and methods section. Respective profiles were overlapped by aligning the 40S to the same height; (D) polysome to monosome ratio (P/M) and heavy to light ratio (H/L) from three independent experiments for control GFP or µ2-expressing cells. Biological replicates, n = 3, one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test against the GFP alone condition (***, p ≤0.001); (E) relative mRNA level determined by qPCR for EFTUD2, PRPF8, SNRNP200, and GAPDH in 40S + 60S, 80S, and polysomal (P1 + P2 + P3) fractions from GFP or µ2-GFP expressing cells at 48 h post-transfection. Lysates were prepared, separated on a 5–50% sucrose gradient, and 30% of each fraction was subjected to RNA extraction using Qiazol. RNA was reverse transcribed using a fixed volume for each sample and subjected to qPCR with U6 snRNA as the housekeeping gene, as it was stable between all fractions. The relative expression is calculated against the first sample in the GFP condition for the 40S + 60S fraction. n = 3, biological replicates, two-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test against the GFP control for each fraction (ns, p > 0.05); and (F) WB against GFP, <t>RPL19</t> (large subunit), RPS2 (small subunit), and actin in polysomal fractions from control GFP or µ2-expressing cells at 48 h post-transfection in HEK 293T cells. Results presented are mean ± standard deviation.
Gfp, supplied by Danaher Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/gfp/product/Danaher Inc
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
gfp - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

99
Danaher Inc instantblue protein stain
Figure 2. The µ2 protein impairs translation: (A) WB of newly synthesized proteins in HEK 293T cells expressing GFP, µ2-GFP, or GFP- µ2. Cells were transfected for 48 h, newly synthesized proteins were metabolically labeled with AHA for 4 h (or DMSO for control), a biotin moiety was added using CLICK chemistry and revealed using streptavidin-HRP. A loading control (actin) was loaded and a WB against GFP was realized to validate the expression of GFP and fusion protein between GFP and µ2; (B) quantification of three independent experiments. Biological replicates, n = 3, one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test against the GFP alone condition (***, p ≤0.001); (C) polysome profiles for control GFP or µ2-expressing cells. Polysome to monosome ratio (P/M) and heavy to light ratio (H/L) were calculated as described in the material and methods section. Respective profiles were overlapped by aligning the 40S to the same height; (D) polysome to monosome ratio (P/M) and heavy to light ratio (H/L) from three independent experiments for control GFP or µ2-expressing cells. Biological replicates, n = 3, one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test against the GFP alone condition (***, p ≤0.001); (E) relative mRNA level determined by qPCR for EFTUD2, PRPF8, SNRNP200, and GAPDH in 40S + 60S, 80S, and polysomal (P1 + P2 + P3) fractions from GFP or µ2-GFP expressing cells at 48 h post-transfection. Lysates were prepared, separated on a 5–50% sucrose gradient, and 30% of each fraction was subjected to RNA extraction using Qiazol. RNA was reverse transcribed using a fixed volume for each sample and subjected to qPCR with U6 snRNA as the housekeeping gene, as it was stable between all fractions. The relative expression is calculated against the first sample in the GFP condition for the 40S + 60S fraction. n = 3, biological replicates, two-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test against the GFP control for each fraction (ns, p > 0.05); and (F) WB against GFP, <t>RPL19</t> (large subunit), RPS2 (small subunit), and actin in polysomal fractions from control GFP or µ2-expressing cells at 48 h post-transfection in HEK 293T cells. Results presented are mean ± standard deviation.
Instantblue Protein Stain, supplied by Danaher Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/instantblue protein stain/product/Danaher Inc
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
instantblue protein stain - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

99
Danaher Inc active recombinant human caspase 3
Figure 2. The µ2 protein impairs translation: (A) WB of newly synthesized proteins in HEK 293T cells expressing GFP, µ2-GFP, or GFP- µ2. Cells were transfected for 48 h, newly synthesized proteins were metabolically labeled with AHA for 4 h (or DMSO for control), a biotin moiety was added using CLICK chemistry and revealed using streptavidin-HRP. A loading control (actin) was loaded and a WB against GFP was realized to validate the expression of GFP and fusion protein between GFP and µ2; (B) quantification of three independent experiments. Biological replicates, n = 3, one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test against the GFP alone condition (***, p ≤0.001); (C) polysome profiles for control GFP or µ2-expressing cells. Polysome to monosome ratio (P/M) and heavy to light ratio (H/L) were calculated as described in the material and methods section. Respective profiles were overlapped by aligning the 40S to the same height; (D) polysome to monosome ratio (P/M) and heavy to light ratio (H/L) from three independent experiments for control GFP or µ2-expressing cells. Biological replicates, n = 3, one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test against the GFP alone condition (***, p ≤0.001); (E) relative mRNA level determined by qPCR for EFTUD2, PRPF8, SNRNP200, and GAPDH in 40S + 60S, 80S, and polysomal (P1 + P2 + P3) fractions from GFP or µ2-GFP expressing cells at 48 h post-transfection. Lysates were prepared, separated on a 5–50% sucrose gradient, and 30% of each fraction was subjected to RNA extraction using Qiazol. RNA was reverse transcribed using a fixed volume for each sample and subjected to qPCR with U6 snRNA as the housekeeping gene, as it was stable between all fractions. The relative expression is calculated against the first sample in the GFP condition for the 40S + 60S fraction. n = 3, biological replicates, two-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test against the GFP control for each fraction (ns, p > 0.05); and (F) WB against GFP, <t>RPL19</t> (large subunit), RPS2 (small subunit), and actin in polysomal fractions from control GFP or µ2-expressing cells at 48 h post-transfection in HEK 293T cells. Results presented are mean ± standard deviation.
Active Recombinant Human Caspase 3, supplied by Danaher Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/active recombinant human caspase 3/product/Danaher Inc
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
active recombinant human caspase 3 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Santa Cruz Biotechnology mouse monoclonal anti icp4 10f1
Figure 2. The µ2 protein impairs translation: (A) WB of newly synthesized proteins in HEK 293T cells expressing GFP, µ2-GFP, or GFP- µ2. Cells were transfected for 48 h, newly synthesized proteins were metabolically labeled with AHA for 4 h (or DMSO for control), a biotin moiety was added using CLICK chemistry and revealed using streptavidin-HRP. A loading control (actin) was loaded and a WB against GFP was realized to validate the expression of GFP and fusion protein between GFP and µ2; (B) quantification of three independent experiments. Biological replicates, n = 3, one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test against the GFP alone condition (***, p ≤0.001); (C) polysome profiles for control GFP or µ2-expressing cells. Polysome to monosome ratio (P/M) and heavy to light ratio (H/L) were calculated as described in the material and methods section. Respective profiles were overlapped by aligning the 40S to the same height; (D) polysome to monosome ratio (P/M) and heavy to light ratio (H/L) from three independent experiments for control GFP or µ2-expressing cells. Biological replicates, n = 3, one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test against the GFP alone condition (***, p ≤0.001); (E) relative mRNA level determined by qPCR for EFTUD2, PRPF8, SNRNP200, and GAPDH in 40S + 60S, 80S, and polysomal (P1 + P2 + P3) fractions from GFP or µ2-GFP expressing cells at 48 h post-transfection. Lysates were prepared, separated on a 5–50% sucrose gradient, and 30% of each fraction was subjected to RNA extraction using Qiazol. RNA was reverse transcribed using a fixed volume for each sample and subjected to qPCR with U6 snRNA as the housekeeping gene, as it was stable between all fractions. The relative expression is calculated against the first sample in the GFP condition for the 40S + 60S fraction. n = 3, biological replicates, two-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test against the GFP control for each fraction (ns, p > 0.05); and (F) WB against GFP, <t>RPL19</t> (large subunit), RPS2 (small subunit), and actin in polysomal fractions from control GFP or µ2-expressing cells at 48 h post-transfection in HEK 293T cells. Results presented are mean ± standard deviation.
Mouse Monoclonal Anti Icp4 10f1, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse monoclonal anti icp4 10f1/product/Santa Cruz Biotechnology
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mouse monoclonal anti icp4 10f1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Figure 2. The µ2 protein impairs translation: (A) WB of newly synthesized proteins in HEK 293T cells expressing GFP, µ2-GFP, or GFP- µ2. Cells were transfected for 48 h, newly synthesized proteins were metabolically labeled with AHA for 4 h (or DMSO for control), a biotin moiety was added using CLICK chemistry and revealed using streptavidin-HRP. A loading control (actin) was loaded and a WB against GFP was realized to validate the expression of GFP and fusion protein between GFP and µ2; (B) quantification of three independent experiments. Biological replicates, n = 3, one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test against the GFP alone condition (***, p ≤0.001); (C) polysome profiles for control GFP or µ2-expressing cells. Polysome to monosome ratio (P/M) and heavy to light ratio (H/L) were calculated as described in the material and methods section. Respective profiles were overlapped by aligning the 40S to the same height; (D) polysome to monosome ratio (P/M) and heavy to light ratio (H/L) from three independent experiments for control GFP or µ2-expressing cells. Biological replicates, n = 3, one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test against the GFP alone condition (***, p ≤0.001); (E) relative mRNA level determined by qPCR for EFTUD2, PRPF8, SNRNP200, and GAPDH in 40S + 60S, 80S, and polysomal (P1 + P2 + P3) fractions from GFP or µ2-GFP expressing cells at 48 h post-transfection. Lysates were prepared, separated on a 5–50% sucrose gradient, and 30% of each fraction was subjected to RNA extraction using Qiazol. RNA was reverse transcribed using a fixed volume for each sample and subjected to qPCR with U6 snRNA as the housekeeping gene, as it was stable between all fractions. The relative expression is calculated against the first sample in the GFP condition for the 40S + 60S fraction. n = 3, biological replicates, two-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test against the GFP control for each fraction (ns, p > 0.05); and (F) WB against GFP, RPL19 (large subunit), RPS2 (small subunit), and actin in polysomal fractions from control GFP or µ2-expressing cells at 48 h post-transfection in HEK 293T cells. Results presented are mean ± standard deviation.

Journal: International journal of molecular sciences

Article Title: Reovirus μ2 Protein Impairs Translation to Reduce U5 snRNP Protein Levels.

doi: 10.3390/ijms24010727

Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 2. The µ2 protein impairs translation: (A) WB of newly synthesized proteins in HEK 293T cells expressing GFP, µ2-GFP, or GFP- µ2. Cells were transfected for 48 h, newly synthesized proteins were metabolically labeled with AHA for 4 h (or DMSO for control), a biotin moiety was added using CLICK chemistry and revealed using streptavidin-HRP. A loading control (actin) was loaded and a WB against GFP was realized to validate the expression of GFP and fusion protein between GFP and µ2; (B) quantification of three independent experiments. Biological replicates, n = 3, one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test against the GFP alone condition (***, p ≤0.001); (C) polysome profiles for control GFP or µ2-expressing cells. Polysome to monosome ratio (P/M) and heavy to light ratio (H/L) were calculated as described in the material and methods section. Respective profiles were overlapped by aligning the 40S to the same height; (D) polysome to monosome ratio (P/M) and heavy to light ratio (H/L) from three independent experiments for control GFP or µ2-expressing cells. Biological replicates, n = 3, one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test against the GFP alone condition (***, p ≤0.001); (E) relative mRNA level determined by qPCR for EFTUD2, PRPF8, SNRNP200, and GAPDH in 40S + 60S, 80S, and polysomal (P1 + P2 + P3) fractions from GFP or µ2-GFP expressing cells at 48 h post-transfection. Lysates were prepared, separated on a 5–50% sucrose gradient, and 30% of each fraction was subjected to RNA extraction using Qiazol. RNA was reverse transcribed using a fixed volume for each sample and subjected to qPCR with U6 snRNA as the housekeeping gene, as it was stable between all fractions. The relative expression is calculated against the first sample in the GFP condition for the 40S + 60S fraction. n = 3, biological replicates, two-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test against the GFP control for each fraction (ns, p > 0.05); and (F) WB against GFP, RPL19 (large subunit), RPS2 (small subunit), and actin in polysomal fractions from control GFP or µ2-expressing cells at 48 h post-transfection in HEK 293T cells. Results presented are mean ± standard deviation.

Article Snippet: The antibodies used in this study are the following: Actin (Sigma, A5441, 1:10,000), EFTUD2 (Abcam, ab188327, 1:2000), FLAG (Sigma, F1804, 1:1000), GFP (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, sc-9996, 1:8000), PRPF8 (Abcam, ab79237, 1:1000), Streptavidin-HRP (ThermoFisher Scientific, N100, 1:5000), RPL19 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, 1:1000), RPS2 (1:2000, a kind gift from the Mark Bedford lab), Vinculin (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, sc-73614, 1:1000).

Techniques: Synthesized, Expressing, Transfection, Metabolic Labelling, Labeling, Control, RNA Extraction, Reverse Transcription, Standard Deviation