Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: GluN2D-containing NMDA receptors regulate dentate gyrus function by facilitating granule cell activity and mediating synaptic plasticity

doi: 10.64898/2026.03.06.710109

Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Grin2d f l/fl mice were injected with AAV5-CamKII-mCherry (Control) or AAV-CamKII-mCherry-Cre ( Grin2d cKO). NMDAR-LTP was abolished in Grin2d cKO compared with control mice (Control: 149.5 ± 6.0 %, p < 0.01, n = 5, paired t-test; cKO: 92.5 ± 5.3 %, p = 0.12201, n = 6, paired t-test; Control vs cKO: p < 0.001, unpaired t-test). (B) WT mice were bilaterally injected with an anti-GluN2D antibody or control Ab into the dentate gyrus. After one hour, animals were euthanized, and slices were prepared. Injection was confirmed by the presence of methylene blue. NMDAR-LTP was abolished in mice injected with the anti-GluN2D antibody (cKO: 110.4 ± 8.5 %, p = 0.2952, n = 6, paired t-test) compared with control mice (Control: 149.8 ± 8.1 %, p < 0.001, n = 7, paired t-test; Control vs cKO: p < 0.01, unpaired t-test). (C) NMDAR-LTP was impaired in Grid1 KO mice (KO: 117.7 ± 5.3, p < 0.05%, n = 8, Wilcoxon signed-rank test) compared with controls (Control: 147.5 ± 6.7 %, p < 0.001, n = 7, paired t-test; Control vs cKO: p < 0.05, Mann-Whitney U test). Data are presented as mean ± s.e.m.

Article Snippet: For GluN2D cross-linking experiments in C57BL/6J, the control group received 1 μL of anti-rabbit Alexa 568 (control IgG, 1/5), while the GluN2D-cross-link group received 1 μg of polyclonal rabbit anti-GluN2D subunit (Alomone Labs, cat #AGC-020), both diluted in PBS with 1% methylene blue (1 μL final volume).

Techniques: Injection, Control, MANN-WHITNEY

Journal: The Korean Journal of Physiology & Pharmacology : Official Journal of the Korean Physiological Society and the Korean Society of Pharmacology

Article Title: The Downregulation of Somatic A-Type K + Channels Requires the Activation of Synaptic NMDA Receptors in Young Hippocampal Neurons of Rats

doi: 10.4196/kjpp.2014.18.2.135

Figure Lengend Snippet: Blocking synaptic NMDA receptors abolishes the effect of glutamate on I A . (A) Example traces showing the effects of acute treatment of glutamate ( acute Glu, 5 µM, 5 min) on somatic I A under either Mg 2+ -included (Mg 2+ (+)) or Mg 2+ -free (Mg 2+ (-)) recording condition. Scale bars: 500 pA, 100 ms. (B) A trace of I A showing that blocking synaptic NMDA receptors by KCl and MK801 pretreatment abolishes the effect of acute glutamate treatment under Mg 2+ -free recording condition (KCl+MK801/ acute Glu). (C) Example traces showing the effects of glycine (Glycine, 200 µM, 5 min) and MK801 (Gly+MK801/ acute Glu, 25 µM) under Mg 2+ -free recording condition. Scale bars: 500 pA, 100 ms. Dotted line indicates the averaged I A peak of control neurons. (D) Summarized changes of current density of I A showing the effects of acute glutamate treatment. The statistical significance was set to p<0.05 or 0.01 ( * compared with control; † compared with acute Glu[Mg 2+ (-)]). Square boxes indicate the mean value of each group and error bars represent SEM.

Article Snippet: In cases of blocking synaptic NMDA receptors, MK801 (25 μM, Tocris) with KCl (20 mM, for 24 hours) or glycine (200 μM, for one hour) was added to the culture media before recording.

Techniques: Blocking Assay, Control

Journal: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Article Title: Single-molecule imaging of the functional crosstalk between surface NMDA and dopamine D1 receptors

doi: 10.1073/pnas.1310145110

Figure Lengend Snippet: The D1R–NMDAR interaction bidirectionally regulates the surface distribution and dynamics of D1R and NMDAR. (A) Immunostaining of surface D1R-CFP (green) and GluN1 subunit (red) in hippocampal neurons. The yellow arrow shows overlay. (B) Immunostaining of surface D1R-CFP in control or after D1/5R agonist, TAT-t2, or TAT-[N2A15] application. (Scale bar, 250 nm.) (C) Normalized measures of D1R-CFP clusters intensity in control (n = 32 neuronal fields), D1/5R agonist-treated (n = 24 neuronal fields; *P < 0.05 compared with control), TAT-NSt2–treated (non-sense of TAT-t2, n = 19 neuronal fields), TAT-t2–treated (n = 21 neuronal fields; **P < 0.01 compared with TAT-NSt2), TAT-NSt3–treated (non-sense of TAT-t3, n = 11 neuronal fields), TAT-t3–treated (n = 12 neuronal fields; P > 0.05 compared with TAT-NSt3), TAT-[NS15]–treated (n = 27 neuronal fields; P > 0.05), or TAT-[N2A15]–treated (n = 21 neuronal fields, *P < 0.05 compared with TAT-[NS15]) conditions. (D) Representative trajectories (1,000 frames, 20-Hz acquisition rate) of surface single D1R-CFP (Left) (green) (scale bar, 400 nm) and GluN1-NMDAR (Right) (blue) (scale bar, 300 nm) in the absence and presence of either D1/5R agonist (10 µM, 15 min) or TAT-t2 (10 µM, 15 min). Bold dotted line, perisynaptic area; thin dotted line, PSD area. (E) Plot of the MSD of surface D1R-CFP (Upper) (green) and GluN1-NMDAR (Lower) (blue) versus time in presence of TAT-NS or TAT-t2 peptides (10 µM, 15 min). The SEM is included for each data point (D1R: TAT-NS, n = 986 trajectories, and TAT-t2, n = 1,326; GluN1-NMDAR: TAT-NS, n = 198, and TAT-t2, n = 134). (F and G) Representative surface distributions of single D1R-CFP (green) (F) and GluN1-NMDAR (blue) (G) in the synaptic area (PSD + perisynaptic area) in control, D1/5R agonist, and TAT-t2 conditions. Each dot represents the detection of a single receptor during a frame. Comparisons of the time spent in the synaptic area (dwell time) by single D1R-CFP (control, n = 173 trajectories; D1/5R agonist, n = 142, **P < 0.01; TAT-t2, n = 752, *P < 0.05) (F) and GluN1-NMDAR (control, n = 189 trajectories; D1/5R agonist, n = 157, *P < 0.05; TAT-t2, n = 134, **P < 0.01) (G) and the synaptic fraction of detected single D1R-CFP (control, n = 14 neuronal fields; D1/5R agonist, n = 19, **P < 0.01; D1/5R agonist in the presence of dynasore, n = 47, **P < 0.01; TAT-t2, n = 15, ***P < 0.001) (F), D5R-CFP (n = 16, P > 0.05) (F), and GluN1-NMDAR (control, n = 11; D1/5R agonist, n = 15, *P < 0.05; TAT-t2, n = 14, *P < 0.05) (G). Dyn., dynasore; D1/5 ago., D1/5 receptor agonist SKF-38393.

Article Snippet: For single-nanoparticle tracking, QD 655 coupled to goat anti-rabbit F(ab′) 2 or anti-mouse IgG (Invitrogen) was incubated (1:10,000, 10 min) onto neurons previously exposed for 10 min to either mouse monoclonal anti-GFP (1 µg; Invitrogen), rabbit polyclonal anti-D1R (1 µg; Lifespan Biosciences), mouse monoclonal anti-GluA2:00 AMPAR subunit (1 µg; Millipore), or rabbit polyclonal anti–GluN1-NMDAR subunit (1 µg; Alomone Laboratories) antibodies.

Techniques: Immunostaining

Journal: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Article Title: Single-molecule imaging of the functional crosstalk between surface NMDA and dopamine D1 receptors

doi: 10.1073/pnas.1310145110

Figure Lengend Snippet: D1R activation or D1R/GluN1-NMDAR interaction blockade increases synaptic NMDAR content and favors AMPAR synaptic long-term potentiation. (A) (Left) Excitatory postsynaptic current traces recorded at −70 mV and +40 mV from a representative hippocampal CA1 pyramidal cell, before and 10 min after exposure to D1/5R agonist. (Right) Relative change over time of the AMPA/NMDA ratio at CA1 synapses in the absence or presence of D1/5R agonist (n = 13, *P < 0.05 10 min after agonist) and in the absence or presence of vehicle (n = 7, P > 0.05). (B) Surface imaging of GluN1-SEP in neurons incubated with either TAT-NS or TAT-t2 (10 µM). (Scale bar, 5 µm.) (Right) Average value of GluN1-SEP content in the synaptic area after TAT-NS or TAT-t2 application (n = 8 neurons per group, **P < 0.01). (C) Dendritic fragment of a hippocampal neuron expressing Homer 1c-DsRed (Upper) and GluA1-SEP (Lower). SEP only fluoresces at neutral pH when receptors are inserted at the plasma membrane. Ten minutes after chemical LTP induction (cLTP), the GluA1-SEP fluorescence intensity increased in postsynaptic clusters. (Insets) High magnification of a synaptic GluA1-SEP cluster. (Scale bar, 2 µm.) (D) Comparison of the synaptic GluA1-SEP fluorescence intensity before and after cLTP with prior TAT-NS (n = 198 synapses, *P < 0.05) or TAT-t2 (n = 215 synapses, *P < 0.05) (TAT-NS versus TAT-t2; *P < 0.05) application. (E) Schematic model of the D1R–NMDAR surface interplay in hippocampal neurons. D1Rs are highly diffusive at the neuronal surface and are dynamically retained in clusters in the vicinity of glutamate synapses where they interact with NMDAR. Dopamine release disrupts this interaction and favors the lateral redistribution of both receptors: D1Rs freely explore extrasynaptic areas, whereas NMDARs laterally reach the PSD where they impact on the long-term plasticity of glutamate synapses.

Article Snippet: For single-nanoparticle tracking, QD 655 coupled to goat anti-rabbit F(ab′) 2 or anti-mouse IgG (Invitrogen) was incubated (1:10,000, 10 min) onto neurons previously exposed for 10 min to either mouse monoclonal anti-GFP (1 µg; Invitrogen), rabbit polyclonal anti-D1R (1 µg; Lifespan Biosciences), mouse monoclonal anti-GluA2:00 AMPAR subunit (1 µg; Millipore), or rabbit polyclonal anti–GluN1-NMDAR subunit (1 µg; Alomone Laboratories) antibodies.

Techniques: Activation Assay, Imaging, Incubation, Expressing, Fluorescence