module software Search Results


interface nd software controlled stimulus events  (Med Associates Inc)
97
Med Associates Inc interface nd software controlled stimulus events
Interface Nd Software Controlled Stimulus Events, supplied by Med Associates Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/module+software/Control+of+Med+I%2FO+Modules+From+Other+Languages+Software/pm18845189-75-6-4
Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
interface nd software controlled stimulus events - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
97/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
clampfit module  (Danaher Inc)
96
Danaher Inc clampfit module
Clampfit Module, supplied by Danaher Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/module+software/Clampfit+Advanced+Analysis+Software+Module+11+SOFTWARE+FOR+WINDOWS+Includes%3A+Clampfit+Advanced+Analysis+Module+11+USB+Security+Key%2E+warranty+covering+parts+%26+labor/pmc06596023-475-8-16
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
clampfit module - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
syngistixtm nano application software v 2 5  (Revvity)
91
Revvity syngistixtm nano application software v 2 5
Syngistixtm Nano Application Software V 2 5, supplied by Revvity, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 91/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/module+software/Syngistix+for+ICP-MS+Nano+Application+Software+Module/pmc10343824-95-39-45
Average 91 stars, based on 1 article reviews
syngistixtm nano application software v 2 5 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
91/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
syngistixtm 2 5  (Revvity)
91
Revvity syngistixtm 2 5
Syngistixtm 2 5, supplied by Revvity, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 91/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/module+software/Syngistix+for+ICP-MS+Single+Cell+Application+Software+Module/pmc10169895-58-0-2
Average 91 stars, based on 1 article reviews
syngistixtm 2 5 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
91/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
grid module of metamorph software  (MetaMorph Inc)
90
MetaMorph Inc grid module of metamorph software
Grid Module Of Metamorph Software, supplied by MetaMorph Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/module+software/grid+module+of+metamorph+software/pmc02716580-168-15-18
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
grid module of metamorph software - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
nano application software module  (Synergistix)
90
Synergistix nano application software module
Nano Application Software Module, supplied by Synergistix, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/module+software/nano+application+software+module/10__1515_slash_pac___2020___1104-54-11-10
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
nano application software module - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
pre-ranked gsea module software  (Broad Institute Inc)
90
Broad Institute Inc pre-ranked gsea module software
RNA sequencing results (GEO dataset GSE94415) of KRAS G12D ;Trp53f / f mesothelioma (KPM) cells ( n = 3) compared with pleural mesothelial cells (PMC; n = 1 pooled triplicate). n denotes biological replicates, since pooled triplicate technical replicates from each cell line were sequenced. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering shows distinctive gene expression of KPM versus PMC. Volcano plot showing some top KPM versus PMC differentially expressed genes. KPM and PMC expression of classic mesothelioma markers (top) and top KPM versus PMC overexpressed genes (bottom). Gene set enrichment analysis, including enrichment score and nominal probability value of the 150 gene‐signature specifically over‐represented in human mesothelioma compared with other thoracic malignancies derived from 113 patients (GSE42977) within the transcriptome of KPM cells versus PMC shows significant enrichment of the human mesothelioma signature in KPM cells. Data information: In (C), data are presented as mean (columns) and 95% confidence interval (bars). P : probability, two‐way ANOVA. ns, *, **, and ***: P > 0.05, P < 0.05, P < 0.01, and P < 0.001, respectively, compared with PMC, Bonferroni post‐tests. Source data are available online for this figure.
Pre Ranked Gsea Module Software, supplied by Broad Institute Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/module+software/pre+ranked+gsea+module+software/pmc08819314-148-12-9
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
pre-ranked gsea module software - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
software eye explorer 1.9.10.0 with viewing module 6.0.9.0  (heidelberg engineering)
90
heidelberg engineering software eye explorer 1.9.10.0 with viewing module 6.0.9.0
RNA sequencing results (GEO dataset GSE94415) of KRAS G12D ;Trp53f / f mesothelioma (KPM) cells ( n = 3) compared with pleural mesothelial cells (PMC; n = 1 pooled triplicate). n denotes biological replicates, since pooled triplicate technical replicates from each cell line were sequenced. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering shows distinctive gene expression of KPM versus PMC. Volcano plot showing some top KPM versus PMC differentially expressed genes. KPM and PMC expression of classic mesothelioma markers (top) and top KPM versus PMC overexpressed genes (bottom). Gene set enrichment analysis, including enrichment score and nominal probability value of the 150 gene‐signature specifically over‐represented in human mesothelioma compared with other thoracic malignancies derived from 113 patients (GSE42977) within the transcriptome of KPM cells versus PMC shows significant enrichment of the human mesothelioma signature in KPM cells. Data information: In (C), data are presented as mean (columns) and 95% confidence interval (bars). P : probability, two‐way ANOVA. ns, *, **, and ***: P > 0.05, P < 0.05, P < 0.01, and P < 0.001, respectively, compared with PMC, Bonferroni post‐tests. Source data are available online for this figure.
Software Eye Explorer 1.9.10.0 With Viewing Module 6.0.9.0, supplied by heidelberg engineering, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/module+software/software+eye+explorer+1+9+10+0+with+viewing+module+6+3+4+0/pmc07431438-96-28-31
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
software eye explorer 1.9.10.0 with viewing module 6.0.9.0 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
multi pass module of the nanonis spm controller software  (Nanonis GmbH)
90
Nanonis GmbH multi pass module of the nanonis spm controller software
RNA sequencing results (GEO dataset GSE94415) of KRAS G12D ;Trp53f / f mesothelioma (KPM) cells ( n = 3) compared with pleural mesothelial cells (PMC; n = 1 pooled triplicate). n denotes biological replicates, since pooled triplicate technical replicates from each cell line were sequenced. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering shows distinctive gene expression of KPM versus PMC. Volcano plot showing some top KPM versus PMC differentially expressed genes. KPM and PMC expression of classic mesothelioma markers (top) and top KPM versus PMC overexpressed genes (bottom). Gene set enrichment analysis, including enrichment score and nominal probability value of the 150 gene‐signature specifically over‐represented in human mesothelioma compared with other thoracic malignancies derived from 113 patients (GSE42977) within the transcriptome of KPM cells versus PMC shows significant enrichment of the human mesothelioma signature in KPM cells. Data information: In (C), data are presented as mean (columns) and 95% confidence interval (bars). P : probability, two‐way ANOVA. ns, *, **, and ***: P > 0.05, P < 0.05, P < 0.01, and P < 0.001, respectively, compared with PMC, Bonferroni post‐tests. Source data are available online for this figure.
Multi Pass Module Of The Nanonis Spm Controller Software, supplied by Nanonis GmbH, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/module+software/multi+pass+module+of+the+nanonis+spm+controller+software/pmc11953432-230-26-31
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
multi pass module of the nanonis spm controller software - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
kinecalc module of the peak motus software package  (Peak Performance Technologies Inc)
90
Peak Performance Technologies Inc kinecalc module of the peak motus software package
RNA sequencing results (GEO dataset GSE94415) of KRAS G12D ;Trp53f / f mesothelioma (KPM) cells ( n = 3) compared with pleural mesothelial cells (PMC; n = 1 pooled triplicate). n denotes biological replicates, since pooled triplicate technical replicates from each cell line were sequenced. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering shows distinctive gene expression of KPM versus PMC. Volcano plot showing some top KPM versus PMC differentially expressed genes. KPM and PMC expression of classic mesothelioma markers (top) and top KPM versus PMC overexpressed genes (bottom). Gene set enrichment analysis, including enrichment score and nominal probability value of the 150 gene‐signature specifically over‐represented in human mesothelioma compared with other thoracic malignancies derived from 113 patients (GSE42977) within the transcriptome of KPM cells versus PMC shows significant enrichment of the human mesothelioma signature in KPM cells. Data information: In (C), data are presented as mean (columns) and 95% confidence interval (bars). P : probability, two‐way ANOVA. ns, *, **, and ***: P > 0.05, P < 0.05, P < 0.01, and P < 0.001, respectively, compared with PMC, Bonferroni post‐tests. Source data are available online for this figure.
Kinecalc Module Of The Peak Motus Software Package, supplied by Peak Performance Technologies Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/module+software/kinecalc+module+of+the+peak+motus+software+package/pmc08016419-115-15-23
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
kinecalc module of the peak motus software package - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
cell scoring module of the metamorph nx software  (MetaMorph Inc)
90
MetaMorph Inc cell scoring module of the metamorph nx software
RNA sequencing results (GEO dataset GSE94415) of KRAS G12D ;Trp53f / f mesothelioma (KPM) cells ( n = 3) compared with pleural mesothelial cells (PMC; n = 1 pooled triplicate). n denotes biological replicates, since pooled triplicate technical replicates from each cell line were sequenced. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering shows distinctive gene expression of KPM versus PMC. Volcano plot showing some top KPM versus PMC differentially expressed genes. KPM and PMC expression of classic mesothelioma markers (top) and top KPM versus PMC overexpressed genes (bottom). Gene set enrichment analysis, including enrichment score and nominal probability value of the 150 gene‐signature specifically over‐represented in human mesothelioma compared with other thoracic malignancies derived from 113 patients (GSE42977) within the transcriptome of KPM cells versus PMC shows significant enrichment of the human mesothelioma signature in KPM cells. Data information: In (C), data are presented as mean (columns) and 95% confidence interval (bars). P : probability, two‐way ANOVA. ns, *, **, and ***: P > 0.05, P < 0.05, P < 0.01, and P < 0.001, respectively, compared with PMC, Bonferroni post‐tests. Source data are available online for this figure.
Cell Scoring Module Of The Metamorph Nx Software, supplied by MetaMorph Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/module+software/cell+scoring+module+of+the+metamorph+nx+software/10__2147_slash_sccaa__s66597-99-17-16
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cell scoring module of the metamorph nx software - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
metamorph colocalization plug-in  (MetaMorph Inc)
90
MetaMorph Inc metamorph colocalization plug-in
RNA sequencing results (GEO dataset GSE94415) of KRAS G12D ;Trp53f / f mesothelioma (KPM) cells ( n = 3) compared with pleural mesothelial cells (PMC; n = 1 pooled triplicate). n denotes biological replicates, since pooled triplicate technical replicates from each cell line were sequenced. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering shows distinctive gene expression of KPM versus PMC. Volcano plot showing some top KPM versus PMC differentially expressed genes. KPM and PMC expression of classic mesothelioma markers (top) and top KPM versus PMC overexpressed genes (bottom). Gene set enrichment analysis, including enrichment score and nominal probability value of the 150 gene‐signature specifically over‐represented in human mesothelioma compared with other thoracic malignancies derived from 113 patients (GSE42977) within the transcriptome of KPM cells versus PMC shows significant enrichment of the human mesothelioma signature in KPM cells. Data information: In (C), data are presented as mean (columns) and 95% confidence interval (bars). P : probability, two‐way ANOVA. ns, *, **, and ***: P > 0.05, P < 0.05, P < 0.01, and P < 0.001, respectively, compared with PMC, Bonferroni post‐tests. Source data are available online for this figure.
Metamorph Colocalization Plug In, supplied by MetaMorph Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/module+software/colocalization+module+of+metamorph+software/10__1523_slash_jneurosci__0337___15__2015-97-2-1
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
metamorph colocalization plug-in - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


RNA sequencing results (GEO dataset GSE94415) of KRAS G12D ;Trp53f / f mesothelioma (KPM) cells ( n = 3) compared with pleural mesothelial cells (PMC; n = 1 pooled triplicate). n denotes biological replicates, since pooled triplicate technical replicates from each cell line were sequenced. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering shows distinctive gene expression of KPM versus PMC. Volcano plot showing some top KPM versus PMC differentially expressed genes. KPM and PMC expression of classic mesothelioma markers (top) and top KPM versus PMC overexpressed genes (bottom). Gene set enrichment analysis, including enrichment score and nominal probability value of the 150 gene‐signature specifically over‐represented in human mesothelioma compared with other thoracic malignancies derived from 113 patients (GSE42977) within the transcriptome of KPM cells versus PMC shows significant enrichment of the human mesothelioma signature in KPM cells. Data information: In (C), data are presented as mean (columns) and 95% confidence interval (bars). P : probability, two‐way ANOVA. ns, *, **, and ***: P > 0.05, P < 0.05, P < 0.01, and P < 0.001, respectively, compared with PMC, Bonferroni post‐tests. Source data are available online for this figure.

Journal: EMBO Molecular Medicine

Article Title: KRAS signaling in malignant pleural mesothelioma

doi: 10.15252/emmm.202013631

Figure Lengend Snippet: RNA sequencing results (GEO dataset GSE94415) of KRAS G12D ;Trp53f / f mesothelioma (KPM) cells ( n = 3) compared with pleural mesothelial cells (PMC; n = 1 pooled triplicate). n denotes biological replicates, since pooled triplicate technical replicates from each cell line were sequenced. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering shows distinctive gene expression of KPM versus PMC. Volcano plot showing some top KPM versus PMC differentially expressed genes. KPM and PMC expression of classic mesothelioma markers (top) and top KPM versus PMC overexpressed genes (bottom). Gene set enrichment analysis, including enrichment score and nominal probability value of the 150 gene‐signature specifically over‐represented in human mesothelioma compared with other thoracic malignancies derived from 113 patients (GSE42977) within the transcriptome of KPM cells versus PMC shows significant enrichment of the human mesothelioma signature in KPM cells. Data information: In (C), data are presented as mean (columns) and 95% confidence interval (bars). P : probability, two‐way ANOVA. ns, *, **, and ***: P > 0.05, P < 0.05, P < 0.01, and P < 0.001, respectively, compared with PMC, Bonferroni post‐tests. Source data are available online for this figure.

Article Snippet: Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) was performed with the Broad Institute pre‐ranked GSEA module software ( http://software.broadinstitute.org/gsea/index.jsp ;Subramanian et al , ).

Techniques: RNA Sequencing, Gene Expression, Expressing, Derivative Assay